1. Christopher Miller  Is a corresponding author
  1. Brandeis University, United States

It's over a century since Henry Dale proposed that acetylcholine was a neurotransmitter (Dale, 1914), 95 years since Otto Loewi showed that the vagus nerve secretes acetylcholine to regulate the heartbeat (Loewi, 1921), 30 years since David Clapham and co-workers showed that acetylcholine binds to G-protein receptors, releasing the Gβγ subunits that activate the GIRK channels in cardiac cells (Logothetis et al., 1987), and three years since Rod MacKinnon and co-workers served up a crystal structure of a GIRK channel complexed with Gβγ subunits (Whorton et al., 2013). Over this span of time, Gβγ regulation of ion channel activity has spawned a field densely populated with neurobiologists and electrophysiologists, with GIRKs being a major focus because of their physiological importance, phenomenological richness, experimental tractability and linkage to human diseases.

Like all potassium ion channels, GIRK (short for G protein gated inward rectifier potassium) channels help shape cellular electrical signals by "quieting" the excitatory actions of sodium, calcium and other ion channels. Most GIRK channels contain four sub-units: those found in cardiac pacemaker cells contain either four GIRK4 sub-units, or two GIRK1 sub-units and two GIRK4 sub-units, and channels containing four GIRK2 sub-units are found in neurons. The Gβγ subunit is also molecularly diverse, with at least 5 β and 13 γ isoforms known. What strikes me as truly remarkable for such intensely studied channels is that the energetics of GIRK activation by Gβγ has remained almost entirely unknown.

Now, in two papers in eLife, MacKinnon and co-workers offer a close-up thermodynamic view of how Gβγ 'ligands' switch on their GIRK 'receptors' in two mammalian systems: the GIRK1/4 channels found in cardiac pacemaker cells and the GIRK2 channels found in neurons. The experiments on GIRK1/4 were performed by Kouki Touhara, Weiwei Wang and MacKinnon, at Rockefeller University (Touhara et al., 2016), while those on GIRK2 were performed by Wang, Touhara and MacKinnon in collaboration with Keiko Weir and Bruce Bean of Harvard Medical School (Wang et al., 2016).

By analyzing a web of binding and conformational equilibria, the researchers produce detailed, yet clear and intuitive, answers to a series of fundamental questions about the activation of GIRK channels. How tightly does the activator bind? How many of the four Gβγ sites in the channel must be occupied for opening to occur? What sort of crosstalk operates between Gβγ and other GIRK activators, such as the phosphoinositides that reside in the cell membrane or the sodium ions (Na+) found in the cytoplasm? How much Gβγ is released into the cell membrane in a synaptic response? Why are certain GIRKs modulated by Na+ and others not? Such questions had not been answered previously, and those few that were posed at all produced soft or discordant conclusions. These questions have lingered so long for a simple reason: the complexity of cell membranes.

The currents through GIRK channels are governed by a sequence of largely uncontrolled time-dependent processes, even in experiments involving an isolated membrane patch facing a solution containing purified Gβγ. The process that causes the most difficulty is probably the hydrolysis of PIP2 (a lipid that is found in cell membranes) by lipid phosphatases embedded in the membrane. And it is no help that soluble Gβγ, though experimentally convenient, only qualitatively mimics the diffusion of this ligand in two dimensions in the cellular membrane.

To explore the properties of ion channels researchers often work with "reconstituted" systems in which purified ion channels are inserted into artificial membranes (see, for example, Wang et al., 2014). MacKinnon and co-workers used membranes that contained known amounts of PIP2 and employed an elegant trick to systematically vary the "concentration" of Gβγ in these membranes (Figure 1). This allowed them to probe the activity of the GIRK channels as the concentration of Gβγ was varied.

Cellular complexity reduced in a reconstituted membrane.

(A) Cellular signaling pathway for the activation of a GIRK channel. A neurotransmitter (such as acetylcholine) binds to its receptor (GPCR), thus releasing the membrane-associated Gα and Gβγ subunits of a G-protein. The Gα subunit activates adenylate cyclase (AC) and phospholipase C (PLC), modulating the level of PIP2 in the cell membrane; the Gβγ subunit activates the GIRK channel. (B) The reduced systems studied by MacKinnon and co-workers are composed of lipid bilayers that contain a GIRK channel and ~1% of PIP2 lipid. The surface density of Gβγ subunits depends on the amount of Ni-NTA lipid in the bilayer because the Gβγ subunits (which are soluble) have a tag (His) that makes them bind to the Ni-NTA lipids. Image courtesy of Weiwei Wang.

The two papers establish a parade of fundamental insights into GIRK channel operation. First, the channels open only when all four sites are occupied by Gβγ, which binds with "positive cooperativity" such that the affinity of the fourth ligand is higher than the affinity of the first by a factor of ~40. These features are functional manifestations of what we know about the structure of the GIRK2–Gβγ complex from X-ray diffraction studies (the Gβγ-binding surface becomes more exposed as the channel opens; Whorton et al., 2013), and they ensure that the channel opens in a switch-like manner as the cellular stimulus is increased. Second, although it is specific, Gβγ binding is also quite weak, so the channels are poised to close swiftly after removal of the stimulus. Third, Na+ in the physiological range boosts Gβγ affinity to GIRK2 or GIRK4 channels: this allows the GIRK channels to increase their activity when floods of Na+ ions enter neurons during high-frequency bursts of excitation.

Touhara et al. then went on to explore why GIRK1/4 channels are not sensitive to cytoplasmic Na+, whereas GIRK4 channels are. The Na+-binding site in the GIRK4 subunit contains an aspartic acid (Asp) residue, but there is an asparagine (Asn) residue at the same site in the GIRK1 subunit (Ho and Murrell-Lagnado, 1999). Na+ binding increases Gβγ affinity in GIRK4 channels, and therefore increases responsiveness to stimulation of the G protein. Touhara et al. find that GIRK1/4 channels behave as if permanently in a high-Na+ state, even when the concentration of Na+ is zero, as though the Asn residue of GIRK1 mimics the electrically neutral Asp-Na+ configuration of the GIRK4 channel at high levels of Na+. Touhara et al. confirm that GIRK currents in cardiac cell lines are Na+-insensitive, implying that most of the GIRK4 in these cells is tied up with GIRK1 in GIRK1/4 channels. Finally, this new understanding of Na+ modulation reported in the first paper (Touhara et al., 2016) was cleverly exploited in the second paper (Wang et al., 2016) to estimate the absolute surface density of Gβγ in dopamine neurons at the peak of a physiological GIRK response: about 1 subunit per 10,000 Å2.

These papers offer a crisp illustration of the power of using purified, defined components to reconstitute membrane functions. Although reductionist approaches are sometimes dismissed as 'unphysiological', they can answer questions about which complex cellular systems are stubbornly ambiguous. The picture of GIRK activation emerging from these experiments can now be fed back into the cellular context with much more confidence than has ever before been possible.

References

    1. Dale HH
    (1914)
    The action of certain esters and ethers of choline, and their relation to muscarine
    Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 6:148–190.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Christopher Miller

    Department of Biochemistry, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States
    For correspondence
    cmiller@brandeis.edu
    Competing interests
    The author declares that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0273-8653

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published: May 13, 2016 (version 1)

Copyright

© 2016, Miller

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 974
    Page views
  • 137
    Downloads
  • 0
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Christopher Miller
(2016)
Ion Channels: Reductionism redux
eLife 5:e16964.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16964

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Weiwei Wang, Kouki K Touhara ... Roderick MacKinnon
    Research Article Updated

    G protein gated inward rectifier K+ (GIRK) channels open and thereby silence cellular electrical activity when inhibitory G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are stimulated. Here we describe an assay to measure neuronal GIRK2 activity as a function of membrane-anchored G protein concentration. Using this assay we show that four Gβγ subunits bind cooperatively to open GIRK2, and that intracellular Na+ – which enters neurons during action potentials – further amplifies opening mostly by increasing Gβγ affinity. A Na+ amplification function is characterized and used to estimate the concentration of Gβγ subunits that appear in the membrane of mouse dopamine neurons when GABAB receptors are stimulated. We conclude that GIRK2, through its dual responsiveness to Gβγ and Na+, mediates a form of neuronal inhibition that is amplifiable in the setting of excess electrical activity.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Karolina Honzejkova, Dalibor Kosek ... Tomas Obsil
    Research Article

    Apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1) is a crucial stress sensor, directing cells toward apoptosis, differentiation, and senescence via the p38 and JNK signaling pathways. ASK1 dysregulation has been associated with cancer and inflammatory, cardiovascular, and neurodegenerative diseases, among others. However, our limited knowledge of the underlying structural mechanism of ASK1 regulation hampers our ability to target this member of the MAP3K protein family towards developing therapeutic interventions for these disorders. Nevertheless, as a multidomain Ser/Thr protein kinase, ASK1 is regulated by a complex mechanism involving dimerization and interactions with several other proteins, including thioredoxin 1 (TRX1). Thus, the present study aims at structurally characterizing ASK1 and its complex with TRX1 using several biophysical techniques. As shown by cryo-EM analysis, in a state close to its active form, ASK1 is a compact and asymmetric dimer, which enables extensive interdomain and interchain interactions. These interactions stabilize the active conformation of the ASK1 kinase domain. In turn, TRX1 functions as a negative allosteric effector of ASK1, modifying the structure of the TRX1-binding domain and changing its interaction with the tetratricopeptide repeats domain. Consequently, TRX1 reduces access to the activation segment of the kinase domain. Overall, our findings not only clarify the role of ASK1 dimerization and inter-domain contacts but also provide key mechanistic insights into its regulation, thereby highlighting the potential of ASK1 protein-protein interactions as targets for anti-inflammatory therapy.