Identification and reconstitution of the rubber biosynthetic machinery on rubber particles from Hevea brasiliensis

Abstract

Natural rubber (NR) is stored in latex as rubber particles (RPs), rubber molecules surrounded by a lipid monolayer. Rubber transferase (RTase), the enzyme responsible for NR biosynthesis, is believed to be a member of the cis-prenyltransferase (cPT) family. However, none of the recombinant cPTs have shown RTase activity independently. We show that HRT1, a cPT from Hevea brasiliensis, exhibits distinct RTase activity in vitro only when it is introduced on detergent-washed Hevea RPs (WRPs) by a cell-free translation-coupled system. Using this system, a heterologous cPT from Lactuca sativa also exhibited RTase activity, indicating proper introduction of cPT on RP is the key to reconstitute active RTase. RP proteomics and interaction network analyses revealed the formation of the protein complex consisting of HRT1, RUBBER ELONGATION FACTOR (REF) and HRT1-REF BRIDGING PROTEIN. The RTase activity enhancement observed for the complex assembled on WRPs indicates the HRT1-containing complex functions as the NR biosynthetic machinery.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated
    1. Takahashi S
    2. Nakayama T
    (2015) Hevea brasiliensis HRTBP mRNA for transferase binding protein,
    Publicly available at the DNA Data Bank of Japan (Accession no: LC057267).
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Satoshi Yamashita

    Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Haruhiko Yamaguchi

    Sumitomo Rubber Industries, Ltd, Kobe, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Toshiyuki Waki

    Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Yuichi Aoki

    Graduate School of Information Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Makie Mizuno

    Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Fumihiro Yanbe

    Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Tomoki Ishii

    Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Ayuta Funaki

    Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Yuzuru Tozawa

    Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Saitama University, Saitama, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Yukino Miyagi-Inoue

    Sumitomo Rubber Industries, Ltd, Kobe, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Kazuhisa Fushihara

    Sumitomo Rubber Industries, Ltd, Kobe, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Toru Nakayama

    Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Seiji Takahashi

    Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
    For correspondence
    takahasi@seika.che.tohoku.ac.jp
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2288-4340

Funding

No external funding was received for this work.

Copyright

© 2016, Yamashita et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 6,845
    views
  • 1,527
    downloads
  • 122
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Satoshi Yamashita
  2. Haruhiko Yamaguchi
  3. Toshiyuki Waki
  4. Yuichi Aoki
  5. Makie Mizuno
  6. Fumihiro Yanbe
  7. Tomoki Ishii
  8. Ayuta Funaki
  9. Yuzuru Tozawa
  10. Yukino Miyagi-Inoue
  11. Kazuhisa Fushihara
  12. Toru Nakayama
  13. Seiji Takahashi
(2016)
Identification and reconstitution of the rubber biosynthetic machinery on rubber particles from Hevea brasiliensis
eLife 5:e19022.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19022

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19022

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Gabriella O Estevam, Edmond Linossi ... James S Fraser
    Research Article

    Mutations in the kinase and juxtamembrane domains of the MET Receptor Tyrosine Kinase are responsible for oncogenesis in various cancers and can drive resistance to MET-directed treatments. Determining the most effective inhibitor for each mutational profile is a major challenge for MET-driven cancer treatment in precision medicine. Here, we used a deep mutational scan (DMS) of ~5764 MET kinase domain variants to profile the growth of each mutation against a panel of 11 inhibitors that are reported to target the MET kinase domain. We validate previously identified resistance mutations, pinpoint common resistance sites across type I, type II, and type I ½ inhibitors, unveil unique resistance and sensitizing mutations for each inhibitor, and verify non-cross-resistant sensitivities for type I and type II inhibitor pairs. We augment a protein language model with biophysical and chemical features to improve the predictive performance for inhibitor-treated datasets. Together, our study demonstrates a pooled experimental pipeline for identifying resistance mutations, provides a reference dictionary for mutations that are sensitized to specific therapies, and offers insights for future drug development.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Kira Breunig, Xuifen Lei ... Luiz O Penalva
    Research Article

    RNA binding proteins (RBPs) containing intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) are present in diverse molecular complexes where they function as dynamic regulators. Their characteristics promote liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) and the formation of membraneless organelles such as stress granules and nucleoli. IDR-RBPs are particularly relevant in the nervous system and their dysfunction is associated with neurodegenerative diseases and brain tumor development. Serpine1 mRNA-binding protein 1 (SERBP1) is a unique member of this group, being mostly disordered and lacking canonical RNA-binding domains. We defined SERBP1’s interactome, uncovered novel roles in splicing, cell division and ribosomal biogenesis, and showed its participation in pathological stress granules and Tau aggregates in Alzheimer’s brains. SERBP1 preferentially interacts with other G-quadruplex (G4) binders, implicated in different stages of gene expression, suggesting that G4 binding is a critical component of SERBP1 function in different settings. Similarly, we identified important associations between SERBP1 and PARP1/polyADP-ribosylation (PARylation). SERBP1 interacts with PARP1 and its associated factors and influences PARylation. Moreover, protein complexes in which SERBP1 participates contain mostly PARylated proteins and PAR binders. Based on these results, we propose a feedback regulatory model in which SERBP1 influences PARP1 function and PARylation, while PARylation modulates SERBP1 functions and participation in regulatory complexes.