Abstract

Premature fusion of the cranial sutures (craniosynostosis), affecting 1 in 2,000 newborns, is treated surgically in infancy to prevent adverse neurologic outcomes. To identify mutations contributing to common non-syndromic midline (sagittal and metopic) craniosynostosis, we performed exome sequencing of 132 parent-offspring trios and 59 additional probands. Thirteen probands (7%) had damaging de novo or rare transmitted mutations in SMAD6, an inhibitor of BMP - induced osteoblast differentiation (P < 10-20). SMAD6 mutations nonetheless showed striking incomplete penetrance (<60%). Genotypes of a common variant near BMP2 that is strongly associated with midline craniosynostosis explained nearly all the phenotypic variation in these kindreds, with highly significant evidence of genetic interaction between these loci via both association and analysis of linkage. This epistatic interaction of rare and common variants defines the most frequent cause of midline craniosynostosis and has implications for the genetic basis of other diseases.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Andrew T Timberlake

    Department of Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8926-9692
  2. Jungmin Choi

    Department of Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Samir Zaidi

    Department of Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Qiongshi Lu

    Department of Biostatistics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Carol Nelson-Williams

    Department of Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Eric D Brooks

    Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Kaya Bilguvar

    Department of Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Irina Tikhonova

    Yale Center for Genome Analysis, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Shrikant Mane

    Department of Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Jenny F Yang

    Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Rajendra Sawh-Martinez

    Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Sarah Persing

    Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Elizabeth G Zellner

    Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Erin Loring

    Department of Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Carolyn Chuang

    Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Amy Galm

    Craniosynostosis and Positional Plagiocephaly Support, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Peter W Hashim

    Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Derek M Steinbacher

    Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Michael L DiLuna

    Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  20. Charles C Duncan

    Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  21. Kevin A Pelphrey

    Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  22. Hongyu Zhao

    Department of Biostatistics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  23. John A Persing

    Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  24. Richard P Lifton

    Department of Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    For correspondence
    richard.lifton@yale.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Yale Center for Mendelian Genomics (NIH M#UM1HG006504-05)

  • Kaya Bilguvar
  • Irina Tikhonova
  • Shrikant Mane

Maxillofacial Surgeons Foundation/ASMS (M#M156301)

  • Eric D Brooks
  • John A Persing

NIH Medical Scientist Training Program (NIH/NIGMS T32GM007205)

  • Andrew T Timberlake
  • Samir Zaidi

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • Andrew T Timberlake
  • Jungmin Choi
  • Samir Zaidi
  • Carol Nelson-Williams
  • Erin Loring
  • Richard P Lifton

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. David Ginsburg, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Michigan, United States

Ethics

Human subjects: All participants or their parents provided written informed consent to participate in a study of genetic causes of craniosynostosis in their family. Written consent was obtained for publication of patient photographs. The study protocol was approved by the Yale Human Investigation Committee Institutional Review Board.

Version history

  1. Received: July 28, 2016
  2. Accepted: August 30, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: September 8, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: September 9, 2016 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record published: September 30, 2016 (version 3)
  6. Version of Record updated: October 26, 2016 (version 4)

Copyright

© 2016, Timberlake et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 9,612
    views
  • 1,423
    downloads
  • 160
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Andrew T Timberlake
  2. Jungmin Choi
  3. Samir Zaidi
  4. Qiongshi Lu
  5. Carol Nelson-Williams
  6. Eric D Brooks
  7. Kaya Bilguvar
  8. Irina Tikhonova
  9. Shrikant Mane
  10. Jenny F Yang
  11. Rajendra Sawh-Martinez
  12. Sarah Persing
  13. Elizabeth G Zellner
  14. Erin Loring
  15. Carolyn Chuang
  16. Amy Galm
  17. Peter W Hashim
  18. Derek M Steinbacher
  19. Michael L DiLuna
  20. Charles C Duncan
  21. Kevin A Pelphrey
  22. Hongyu Zhao
  23. John A Persing
  24. Richard P Lifton
(2016)
Two locus inheritance of non-syndromic midline craniosynostosis via rare SMAD6 and common BMP2 alleles
eLife 5:e20125.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20125

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20125

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Lisa Baumgartner, Jonathan J Ipsaro ... Julius Brennecke
    Research Advance

    Members of the diverse heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) family play crucial roles in heterochromatin formation and maintenance. Despite the similar affinities of their chromodomains for di- and tri-methylated histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9me2/3), different HP1 proteins exhibit distinct chromatin-binding patterns, likely due to interactions with various specificity factors. Previously, we showed that the chromatin-binding pattern of the HP1 protein Rhino, a crucial factor of the Drosophila PIWI-interacting RNA (piRNA) pathway, is largely defined by a DNA sequence-specific C2H2 zinc finger protein named Kipferl (Baumgartner et al., 2022). Here, we elucidate the molecular basis of the interaction between Rhino and its guidance factor Kipferl. Through phylogenetic analyses, structure prediction, and in vivo genetics, we identify a single amino acid change within Rhino’s chromodomain, G31D, that does not affect H3K9me2/3 binding but disrupts the interaction between Rhino and Kipferl. Flies carrying the rhinoG31D mutation phenocopy kipferl mutant flies, with Rhino redistributing from piRNA clusters to satellite repeats, causing pronounced changes in the ovarian piRNA profile of rhinoG31D flies. Thus, Rhino’s chromodomain functions as a dual-specificity module, facilitating interactions with both a histone mark and a DNA-binding protein.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Ramona Weber, Chung-Te Chang
    Research Article

    Recent findings indicate that the translation elongation rate influences mRNA stability. One of the factors that has been implicated in this link between mRNA decay and translation speed is the yeast DEAD-box helicase Dhh1p. Here, we demonstrated that the human ortholog of Dhh1p, DDX6, triggers the deadenylation-dependent decay of inefficiently translated mRNAs in human cells. DDX6 interacts with the ribosome through the Phe-Asp-Phe (FDF) motif in its RecA2 domain. Furthermore, RecA2-mediated interactions and ATPase activity are both required for DDX6 to destabilize inefficiently translated mRNAs. Using ribosome profiling and RNA sequencing, we identified two classes of endogenous mRNAs that are regulated in a DDX6-dependent manner. The identified targets are either translationally regulated or regulated at the steady-state-level and either exhibit signatures of poor overall translation or of locally reduced ribosome translocation rates. Transferring the identified sequence stretches into a reporter mRNA caused translation- and DDX6-dependent degradation of the reporter mRNA. In summary, these results identify DDX6 as a crucial regulator of mRNA translation and decay triggered by slow ribosome movement and provide insights into the mechanism by which DDX6 destabilizes inefficiently translated mRNAs.