Endoplasmic Reticulum: Keeping in shape

  1. Craig Blackstone  Is a corresponding author
  2. William A Prinz
  1. National Institutes of Health, United States

The endoplasmic reticulum is the largest single structure in eukaryotic cells. It consists of a range of interconnected shapes, including sheets and tubules, and comprises a lumen enclosed by a membrane that is continuous with the membrane that surrounds the nucleus of the cell (Figure 1). The structure and dynamic nature of the endoplasmic reticulum allow it to be involved in many processes in cells: these processes include protein production and degradation, cell signaling, and the synthesis and distribution of lipids and fat molecules. Form follows function, and understanding how the distinct shapes of the endoplasmic reticulum are regulated and maintained is currently an area of intense interest in cell biology (Goyal and Blackstone, 2013; Westrate et al., 2015).

The endoplasmic reticulum consists of various interconnected shapes.

At the center of the cell, the nuclear envelope contains pores that control what molecules enter and exit the nucleus. The nuclear envelope is also connected to the stacked sheets (cisternae) of the rough endoplasmic reticulum, which is specialized for protein production. From the rough endoplasmic reticulum, the tubules of the smooth endoplasmic reticulum (blue) form a network that extends across the cell and is interspersed with sheet-like structures (peripheral sheets). From Goyal and Blackstone (2013).

Image credit: Goyle and Blackstone (public domain).

Over the past decade, several proteins that shape the endoplasmic reticulum have been identified. In many cases, these proteins are evolutionarily conserved across eukaryotes, from yeast to mammalian cells. Membrane proteins of the reticulon and REEP families can generate curves in membranes and act to maintain the tubules (Voeltz et al., 2006). Atlastin proteins mediate the tethering and fusion of tubules to one other to form three-way junctions (Hu et al., 2009; Orso et al., 2009), which appear to be stabilized by a membrane protein called lunapark (Shemesh et al., 2014; Chen et al., 2015). Several other proteins help the endoplasmic reticulum to maintain contact with the cell membrane, other cell compartments and the cytoskeleton. Increasingly, studies have revealed dynamic changes in the shape of the endoplasmic reticulum in processes such as cell division and during electrical activity in neurons (Goyal and Blackstone, 2013; Phillips and Voeltz, 2016).

Proteins involved in shaping the endoplasmic reticulum have mostly been studied individually, even though they are known to interact with one another. Now, in eLife, Tom Rapoport and co-workers at Harvard Medical School – including Songyu Wang, Hanna Tukachinsky and Fabian Romano – report on how three key proteins work together to shape and maintain the endoplasmic reticulum (Wang et al., 2016).

Wang et al. performed CRISPR/Cas9 gene knock outs and stable gene transfections in mammalian cells and also investigated egg extracts from the frog Xenopus, which can form an endoplasmic reticulum network in vitro that is strikingly similar to that seen in intact cells. They found that in addition to being required for the formation of three-way junctions, atlastins are also necessary to maintain such junctions. Wang et al. further report on the interplay among the proteins that are involved in shaping the endoplasmic reticulum. For instance, lunapark is not required for three-way junctions to form, but its depletion appears to cause a loss of tubule junctions and an increase in the number of sheet-like structures.

Another remarkable finding is that the endoplasmic reticulum network fragments if atlastin is inhibited (see also Orso et al., 2009), or if the reticulon proteins are overexpressed. This indicates that the network can spontaneously disassemble in some circumstances and may explain why no proteins specifically involved in the splitting of tubules have ever been identified. Although the endoplasmic reticulum is generally thought to be continuous, previous studies have shown that it can split up in certain situations, for example during the fertilization of starfish eggs or during excessive electrical activity in neurons (Goyal and Blackstone, 2013). A future challenge will be to find out how and why cells might fragment their endoplasmic reticulum.

Finally, Wang et al. propose a compelling mechanism for how lunapark is regulated by phosphorylation during cell division. Modifying lunapark to mimic phosphorylated lunapark caused it to disappear from three-way junctions. This result, coupled with a recent study showing that lunapark is a component of a ubiquitin ligase complex at three-way junctions (Zhao et al., 2016), will probably lead to additional studies into how structural modifications regulate these proteins to control the shape of the endoplasmic reticulum.

We have likely just scratched the surface of how the endoplasmic reticulum is shaped, and additional proteins and regulatory mechanisms will surely be uncovered. Investigating the dynamic interactions of the endoplasmic reticulum with other cell compartments and the plasma membrane seems a particularly exciting area. Furthermore, numerous endoplasmic reticulum shaping proteins are mutated in inherited neurological disorders, particularly the hereditary spastic paraplegias (Blackstone, 2012). Future studies will benefit from emerging new super-resolution microscopy tools, improving our understanding of how the endoplasmic reticulum is dynamically shaped in health and disease.

References

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Craig Blackstone

    National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    For correspondence
    BlackstC@ninds.nih.gov
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. William A Prinz

    National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published: September 13, 2016 (version 1)

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 11,281
    Page views
  • 346
    Downloads
  • 3
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Craig Blackstone
  2. William A Prinz
(2016)
Endoplasmic Reticulum: Keeping in shape
eLife 5:e20468.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20468

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Jie Li, Jiayi Wu ... Eunhee Choi
    Research Article Updated

    The insulin receptor (IR) and insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R) control metabolic homeostasis and cell growth and proliferation. The IR and IGF1R form similar disulfide bonds linked homodimers in the apo-state; however, their ligand binding properties and the structures in the active state differ substantially. It has been proposed that the disulfide-linked C-terminal segment of α-chain (αCTs) of the IR and IGF1R control the cooperativity of ligand binding and regulate the receptor activation. Nevertheless, the molecular basis for the roles of disulfide-linked αCTs in IR and IGF1R activation are still unclear. Here, we report the cryo-EM structures of full-length mouse IGF1R/IGF1 and IR/insulin complexes with modified αCTs that have increased flexibility. Unlike the Γ-shaped asymmetric IGF1R dimer with a single IGF1 bound, the IGF1R with the enhanced flexibility of αCTs can form a T-shaped symmetric dimer with two IGF1s bound. Meanwhile, the IR with non-covalently linked αCTs predominantly adopts an asymmetric conformation with four insulins bound, which is distinct from the T-shaped symmetric IR. Using cell-based experiments, we further showed that both IGF1R and IR with the modified αCTs cannot activate the downstream signaling potently. Collectively, our studies demonstrate that the certain structural rigidity of disulfide-linked αCTs is critical for optimal IR and IGF1R signaling activation.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Zhanwu Zhu, Jingjing Liu ... Bo Cheng
    Research Article

    Dynamic regulation of transcription is crucial for the cellular responses to various environmental or developmental cues. Gdown1 is a ubiquitously expressed, RNA polymerase II (Pol II) interacting protein, essential for the embryonic development of metazoan. It tightly binds Pol II in vitro and competitively blocks the binding of TFIIF and possibly other transcriptional regulatory factors, yet its cellular functions and regulatory circuits remain unclear. Here, we show that human GDOWN1 strictly localizes in the cytoplasm of various types of somatic cells and exhibits a potent resistance to the imposed driving force for its nuclear localization. Combined with the genetic and microscope-based approaches, two types of the functionally coupled and evolutionally conserved localization regulatory motifs are identified, including the CRM1-dependent nucleus export signal (NES) and a novel Cytoplasmic Anchoring Signal (CAS) that mediates its retention outside of the nuclear pore complexes (NPC). Mutagenesis of CAS alleviates GDOWN1’s cytoplasmic retention, thus unlocks its nucleocytoplasmic shuttling properties, and the increased nuclear import and accumulation of GDOWN1 results in a drastic reduction of both Pol II and its associated global transcription levels. Importantly, the nuclear translocation of GDOWN1 occurs in response to the oxidative stresses, and the ablation of GDOWN1 significantly weakens the cellular tolerance. Collectively, our work uncovers the molecular basis of GDOWN1’s subcellular localization and a novel cellular strategy of modulating global transcription and stress-adaptation via controlling the nuclear translocation of GDOWN1.