Modularity and determinants of a (bi-)polarization control system from free-living and obligate intracellular bacteria

  1. Matthieu Bergé
  2. Sébastien Campagne
  3. Johann Mignolet
  4. Seamus Holden
  5. Laurence Théraulaz
  6. Suliana Manley
  7. Frédéric H-T Allain
  8. Patrick H Viollier  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Geneva, Switzerland
  2. Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, Switzerland
  3. École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland
7 figures and 2 additional files

Figures

Figure 1 with 1 supplement
The Zinc finger (ZnR) of ZitP and orthologs is a polar localization signal.

(A) Schematics of PopZ and ParB localization and chromosome organization during the C. crescentus cell cycle. Each cell cycle yields two different daughter cells: a swarmer (SW) and a stalked (ST) cell residing in G1- and S-phase, respectively. The replication origin region (red, including the centromeric sequence eight kbp from the origin) and the terminus region (yellow) are shown. (B) Schematic of the domain organization in ZitP: the N-terminal zinc-finger domain (ZnR), the transmembrane domain (TM) and the C-terminal domain-of-unknown function (DUF3426). The green arrowhead points to the codon in the zitP coding sequence harboring the GFP insertion in the zitP::Tn5-GFP strain. All regions are drawn to scale. Numbers indicate residues. (C) Alignment of the ZnR from α-proteobacterial ZitP orthologs (in red) and one δ-proteobacterium (in blue) (accession nos.: YP_002517671 [Cc, Caulobacter crescentus], ADU14901 [Ae, Asticcacaulis excentricus], ABI66665 [Mm, Maricaulis maris], ADG11315 [Cs, Caulobacter segnis], WP_003168465 [Bd, Brevundimonas diminuta], WP_014365322 [Rm, Rickettsia massiliae], WP_011909408 [Rs, Rhodobacter sphaeroides] and ABF87224 [Mx, Myxococcus xanthus]). The four cysteine residues coordinating the zinc ion are highlighted (blue arrowheads). Asterisks indicate the conserved residues promoting ZitP•PopZ complex formation. (D) Overlays of fluorescence and phase contrast images showing the subcellular localization of ZitPTn-GFP encoded by the zitP::Tn5-GFP allele in WT or ΔpopZ C. crescentus cells (top). The graphs below show the quantitation of the localization from above. The left graph indicates the distribution of foci along the longitudinal axis. Focus (n = 1048) position is given in relative coordinates from 0 (pole) to 0.5 (midcell). P, pole; M, midcell. The right graph shows the percentage of cells containing at least one focus of ZitPTn-GFP in WT (n = 1048) or in ΔpopZ cells (n = 426). (E) Overlay images as in D showing the subcellular localization of the first 90 residues of ZitP from C. crescentus (Cc) and orthologs from A. excentricus (Ae), M. maris (Mm), C. segnis (Cs) in C. crescentus WT (upper panels) or ΔpopZ (bottom panels) cells. Strains expressing Dendra2-ZitP1-90 from the chromosomal xylX locus were induced with xylose for 4 hr before imaging (phase contrast and Dendra2-fluorescence). (F) Overlay images as in D showing the subcellular localization of the ZnR of ZitP (Dendra2-ZitP1-43) of C. crescentus (Cc) and orthologs from B. diminuta (Bd) in WT (upper panels) or ΔpopZ (bottom panels) C. crescentus cells. Strains expressing Dendra2-ZitP1-43 from the chromosomal xylX locus were induced with xylose for 4 hr before imaging (phase contrast and Dendra2- fluorescence). (G) Time-lapse imaging of swarmer cells from ΔzitP cells expressing Dendra2-ZitP1-43 from the chromosomal xylX locus after induction for 1 hr with 0.3% xylose. Cells were then synchronized and transferred onto an agarose pad containing 0.3% xylose (t = 0 min), and visualized at 40 min intervals (time in minutes is indicated in the images) by phase contrast and Dendra2-fluorescence microscopy, respectively. Shown above the overlays are the schematics representing ZitP1-43 localization during the C. crescentus cell cycle. (H) Images of ΔzitP cells expressing Dendra2-ZitP1-43 from the chromosomal xylX locus and mCherry-PopZ from the native chromosomal popZ locus. Fluorescence and phase contrast images were acquired after 4 hr of induction with 0.3% xylose. Cells expressing Dendra2-ZitP1-43 (left panel, green) and mCherry-PopZ (middle panel, red) are shown. Co-localized red and green foci appear yellow in the overlay (right panel).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20640.002
Figure 1—figure supplement 1
Conservation of ZitP and PopZ.

(A) Distribution of PopZ-, ZitP-, ZnR- and DUF3426-encoding sequences in various α-proteobacterial orders. A 5000-residue long concatamer of universal proteins used to create the phylogeny based on the Neighbor-Joining method with a Dayhoff evolutionary model and 100 bootstrap replicates by Brilli et al. (Brilli et al., 2010) was modified. Blue and white boxes indicate the presence or absence of orthologs as identified by bi-directional BLASTP searches. (B) AgmX from M. xanthus is not polarly localized in C. crescentus. Subcellular localization of the AgmX ZnR (encoded in the δ-proteobacterium M. xanthus) expressed form the xylX locus in WT C. crescentus cells. Dendra2-fluorescence (left panels) and overlay between phase and Dendra2-fluorescence and phase channel (right panels) are shown. Synthesis of the Dendra2-AgmX1-90 was induced for 4 hr with 0.3% xylose before imaging. (C) Immunoblots showing the abundance of the Dendra2-ZitP1-43 in WT or ΔpopZ C. crescentus cells. Expression of Dendra2-ZitP1-43 integrated at the chromosomal xylX locus was induced during 4 hr by the addition of 0.3% xylose. The abundance of Dendra2-ZitP1-43 in WT or ΔpopZ cells was monitored using antibodies to Dendra2 (top) or MreB (bottom) as a loading control. A strain that does not express Dendra2 was used as a negative control (empty).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20640.003
Figure 2 with 1 supplement
The ZnR of ZitP directly interacts with PopZ.

(A) Images showing the localization of Dendra2-ZitP1-43 in ΔzitP cells harbouring the empty vector (upper panel) or a plasmid to overproduce PopZ under control of the vanillate-inducible Pvan promoter (lower panel). Images were taken before (- van) or after PopZ overexpression was induced by the addition of 0.5 mM vanillate for 5 hr (+ van). (B) Images of E. coli TB28 cells co-expressing Dendra2-ZitP1-43 from C. crescentus (Cc), B. diminuta (Bd) or M. maris (Mm) and mCherry-PopZ. The Dendra2-fluorescence (green channel, right), the mCherry-fluorescence (red, middle) or the combined fluorescence (yellow) channels are shown as overlays with phase contrast images. Cells were grown in LB media for 2 hr, then Dendra2-ZitP1-43 variants were induced with 1 mM IPTG and mCherry-PopZ was induced with 0.2% L-arabinose for 2 hr. (C) Isothermal titration calorimetry experiments (upper) measuring changes upon injection of 4 μL of a 300 μM PopZ solution into a 15 μM solution of ZitP1-43 (left panel) or ZitP1-43W35I (right panel). (Lower) Plot showing the integrated heat changes following each injection as a function of the molar ratio of PopZ to ZitP1-43 (left panel) or ZitP1-43W35I (right panel). (D) Stereo view of the NMR solution structure of ZitP1-43. The secondary structure elements, the cysteine residues coordinating the zinc ion and W35 are indicated. (E) Electrostatic surface potential representation of ZitP1-43. Several residues in the basic patch are labelled. (F) Overlay of the 2D 1H-15N TROSY HSQC spectra of ZitP1-43 (black spectrum) or ZitP1-43 in complex with PopZ (red spectrum). Black arrows indicate spectroscopic shifts/appearance of new species.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20640.004
Figure 2—figure supplement 1
Purification of ZitP and PopZ.

(A) Overlays of Dendra2-fluorescence with phase contrast images of C. crescentus cells expressing Dendra2-ZitP from the xylX locus without PopZ overproduction (-van, top panel) or with PopZ overproduction (+van. lower). To achieve PopZ expression, cells were induced with in 0.5 mM vanillate for 5 hr prior to imaging. (B) Chromatograms of the size exclusion chromatography (SEC) experiments performed on superdex S75 in the NMR buffer with purified His6-tagged PopZ alone or incubated with one molar equivalent ZitP1-43 shown in blue and orange respectively. PopZ alone elutes already as a high molecular weight oligomer. Using these experiments, we found that ZitP co-purifies with PopZ in agreement with the NMR data and the ITC data. (C) SDS-PAGE analysis of the PopZ elution peak. Numbers indicate the molecular masses in kDa. (D) SDS-PAGE analysis of the PopZ-ZitP elution peak. Numbers indicate the molecular masses in kDa. (E) 2D 1 H-15N HSQC spectrum of ZitP1-43.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20640.005
Figure 3 with 1 supplement
Molecular determinants underpinning the ZitP•PopZ complex.

(A) Images showing the subcellular localization of WT C. crescentus cells expressing Dendra2-ZitP1-43(WT), Dendra2-ZitP1-43(CS), Dendra2-ZitP1-43(W35I) or Dendra2-ZitP1-43(R24A/R27A) from the xylX locus. Synthesis of the Dendra2-ZitP1-43 variants was induced with xylose for 4 hr before phase contrast and Dendra2-fluorescence imaging. (B) Images of E. coli TB28 cells expressing Dendra2-ZitP1-43(WT), Dendra2-ZitP1-43(CS), Dendra2-ZitP1-43(W35I) or Dendra2-ZitP1-43(R24A/R27A) (left panels) in the presence of mCherry-PopZ (middle panels). Overlays between green (Dendra2) and/or red (mCherry) fluorescence and phase contrast images are shown (right panels). Cells were grown in LB for 2 hr, then the expression of Dendra2-ZitP1-43 variants and of mCherry-PopZ was induced with 1 mM IPTG and 0.2% L-arabinose, respectively, for 2 hr. (C) Images of WT C. crescentus cells expressing R. sphaeroides (Rs) Dendra2-ZitP1-43(WT), Dendra2-ZitP1-43(Q27R) or Dendra2-ZitP1-43(Q27R/W35I) and of ΔpopZ C. crescentus cells expressing R. sphaeroides Dendra2-ZitP1-43(WT). Synthesis of the Dendra2-ZitP1-43 variants was induced from the xylX locus 4 hr before phase contrast and Dendra2-fluorescence imaging. (D) Images of E. coli TB28 cells expressing R. sphaeroides (Rs) Dendra2-ZitP1-43(WT), Dendra2-ZitP1-43(Q27R) or Dendra2-ZitP1-43(Q27R/W35I) (left panels) in the presence of mCherry-PopZ (middle panels). Overlays between green (Dendra2) and/or red (mCherry) fluorescence channels with phase contrast images are shown (right panel). Cells were grown in LB for 2 hr, then the expression of Dendra2-ZitP1-43 variants and of mCherry-PopZ was induced with 1 mM IPTG and 0.2% L-arabinose, respectively, for 2 hr.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20640.006
Figure 3—figure supplement 1
Steady-state levels of Dendra-ZitP1-143 variants.

(A) Immunoblots using antibodies to Dendra2 (top) or MreB (bottom, loading control) showing the abundance of Dendra2-ZitP1-43 variants in C. crescentus WT strains. Expression of Dendra2-ZitP1-43 variants (CS: C5S/C8S/C28S/C31S quadruple; W35I and R24A/R27A double mutants) was induced from the xylX locus for 4 hr by the addition of 0.3% xylose. A strain that does not encode the Dendra2 was used as negative control (empty). (B) Immunoblots using antibodies to Dendra2 (top) or MreB (bottom, control) showing the abundance of the Dendra2-ZitP1-43 variants from R. sphaeroides (Rs) in C. crescentus WT strains. Expression of Dendra2-ZitP1-43 variants (WT, Q27R and Q27R/W35I double mutants) was induced from the xylX locus for 4 hr by the addition of 0.3% xylose. A strain that does not encode the Dendra2 was used as negative control (empty).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20640.007
Figure 4 with 3 supplements
The ZitP•PopZ complex controls the C.

crescentus cell division cycle. (A) Overlays of mCherry-fluorescence and phase contrast images of WT (upper panels) or ΔzitP (bottom) C. crescentus expressing the mCherry-PopZKE variant that no longer interacts with ParB. mCherry-PopZKE is expressed from the native locus (mCherry-popZKE) in lieu of untagged PopZ. Below the micrographs are quantifications of cells with and without bipolar or monopolar fluorescent foci of mCherry-PopZKE. (B) Efficiency of plating (EOP) assays of C. crescentus strains expressing WT mCherry-PopZ (mCherry-popZ) or variants that no longer interact with ParB (mCherry-popZKE), with ParA (mCherry-popZSP) or both (mCherry-popZKEP and mCherry-popZΔ26) in WT or ΔzitP cells. Serial ten-fold dilutions were plated on PYE agar containing spectinomycin. (C) Growth measurements of various strains monitored by optical density at 660 nm (OD660) in PYE. (D) Overlays of CFP- and mCherry-fluorescence with phase contrast images from C. crescentus popZ::mCherry-popZ parB::CFP-parB cells harbouring an empty plasmid (pMT464, left panel) or the pPxyl-ZitP1-133(WT) derivative followed by time-lapse analysis with images acquired every 40 min. (E) Overlays of mCherry-fluorescence with phase contrast images from C. crescentus popZ::mCherry-popZ parB::CFP-parB cells harbouring an empty plasmid (pMT464, left panel) or derivatives: pPxyl-ZitP1-133(WT) (second panel), pPxyl-ZitP1-133(CS) (third panel), pPxyl-ZitP1-133(W35I) (fourth panel) and pPxyl-ZitP1-133(R24A/R27A) (right panel). Overexpression of ZitP1-133 variants was induced with xylose 0.3% for 6 hr prior to imaging. (F) Overlays of mCherry-fluorescence with phase contrast images from C. crescentus popZ::mCherry-popZ parB::CFP-parB cells harbouring a Pxyl-ZitP1-133(MalF-TM), Pxyl-ZitP1-133(WT) or a Pxyl-ZitP1-90 overexpression plasmid. Overexpression was induced by growth in 0.3% xylose for 6 hr prior to imaging. (G) Overlays of mCherry-fluorescence with phase contrast images from C. crescentus popZ::mCherry-popZKEP parB::CFP-parB cells harbouring a Pxyl-ZitP1-133(WT) or a Pxyl-ZitP1-133(W35I) overexpression plasmid. Overexpression was induced by growth in 0.3% xylose for 6 hr prior to imaging.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20640.008
Figure 4—figure supplement 1
ChIP-Seq analysis of ZitP.

Genome-wide occupancies of ParB in WT cells and ZitP in WT, ΔzitP and popZ mutant cells as determined by ChIP-Seq using antibodies to ParB (α-ParB) and different antibodies to (the N-terminal and C-terminal domains of) ZitP [α-ZitP(NTD) and α-ZitP(CTD), respectively]. The x axis denotes the nucleotide position on the genome, whereas the y axis denotes the relative abundance of reads for each probe (see Supplementary Methods for detailed description). Note that only the region from nucleotide 4,025,000 to 4,045,000 of the C. crescentus WT (NA1000) genome containing the parS centromere region is shown. Genes encoded from right to left are shown as blue bars, whereas the red bars indicate genes on the reverse strand. The numbers above the coding sequences refer to the CCNA gene annotation (Marks et al., 2010).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20640.009
Figure 4—figure supplement 2
Quantification of polar CFP-ParB and mCherry-PopZ in C.crescentus WT and mutants.

Quantification of CFP-ParB and mCherry-PopZ localization in zitP+ or ΔzitP strains expressing CFP-ParB in lieu of untagged ParB from the parB locus and mCherry-PopZ from the popZ locus in lieu of native PopZ.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20640.010
Figure 4—figure supplement 3
Localization of ParB and ParA upon ZitP1-133 overexpression in C.crescentus.

(A) Kymograph showing GFP-ParB localization along the C. crescentus cell cycle in WT or ZitP1-133 overproduction. Swarmer (G1-phase) cells harbouring an empty plasmid or overexpressing ZitP1-133(WT) were cultivated in M2G before synchronization and transferred onto an agarose pad containing 0.3% xylose (t = 0 min) to induce ZitP1-133, and visualized at 20 min intervals by light and fluorescence microscopy, respectively. Images were analysed using the kymograph tool from Microbe tracker. One representative cell from the parB::GFP-parB strain harbouring the empty plasmid is shown as well as two representative cells from the parB::GFP-parB strain overexpressing ZitP1-133. Green arrowheads indicate the localization of GFP-ParB according to the cell length. (B) Images of C. crescentus harbouring an empty plasmid (pMT464, top panel), pPxyl-ZitP1-133(WT) (middle panel), pPxyl-ZitP1-133(CS) (bottom panel) and expressing from the chromosomal xylX locus a ParAG16V-eYFP (dimerization deficient mutant which localize preferentially at the cell pole rather than nucleoid)(Ptacin et al., 2010). ZitP1-133 over-expression was induced by growth in xylose 0.3% for 6 hr prior to imaging. Overlays between phase contrast and YFP-fluorescence images are shown. (C) Immunoblot showing the steady-state levels of C. crescentus ZitP or ZitP derivatives expressed from Pxyl on pMT464 in C. crescentus WT cells. WT harbouring empty pMT464 was used as a control. The blot was probed with the polyclonal antibody to the ZitP N-terminal domain (NTD). Note that endogenous ZitP expressed form the zitP locus is not detectable on this exposure due to the strong overproduction of the ZitP variants from the high copy plasmid.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20640.011
Figure 5 with 2 supplements
ZitP controls PopZ bipolarity in E.

coli and C. crescentus. (A) Overlays of mCherry-fluorescence with phase contrast images of E. coli TB28 cells co-expressing mCherry-PopZ and various (untagged) ZitP versions: full length ZitP, or the derivatives ZitP1-133, ZitP1-133(W35I) and ZitP1-133(MalF-TM). Cells were grown in LB for 2 hr, then ZitP variants and mCherry-PopZ were induced with 1 mM IPTG and 0.2% L-arabinose, respectively, for 2 hr before imaging. (B) Overlays of Dendra2-fluorescence with phase contrast images of E. coli TB28 cells co-expressing (untagged) PopZ and full length Dendra2-ZitP, Dendra2-ZitP1-133(WT), Dendra2-ZitP1-133(W35I) or Dendra2-ZitP1-133(MalF-TM). Cells were grown in LB for 2 hr, then Dendra2-ZitP and mCherry-PopZ were induced with 1 mM IPTG and 0.2% L-arabinose, respectively, for 2 hr before imaging. (C) PALM (photo-activated localization microscopy) images of E. coli cells expressing Dendra2-ZitP from pSRK-Km (Khan et al., 2008) and either no PopZ (empty pBAD101(Guzman et al., 1995) vector, strain EC127, left panel) or untagged PopZ from pBAD101 (strain EC132, right panel). (D) Overlays of Dendra2- and mCherry-fluorescence with phase contrast images showing the co-localization of Dendra2-ParB (from Plac on pSRK-Km) with WT or W35I mCherry-ZitP1-133 derivatives in E. coli cells co-expressed with untagged PopZ from Para on pBAD22. (E) Overlays of CFP- and/or mCherry-fluorescence with phase contrast images of C. crescentus popZ::mCherry-popZ parB::CFP-parB cells co-overexpressing (untagged) full-length ZitP, ZitP1-90, ZitP1-133(W35I) or ZitP1-133(WT) with (untagged) PopZ under Pxyl control from pMT464. Over-expression was induced by growth in xylose 0.3% for 4 hr prior to imaging. mCherry-PopZ (upper panel) and CFP-ParB (middle panel) are expressed from their native promoters at the respective endogenous chromosomal loci in lieu of the untagged form.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20640.012
Figure 5—figure supplement 1
Co-localization of ZitP and PopZ in E.coli.

(A) Quantification of mCherry-PopZ localization in E. coli cells co-expressing mCherry-PopZ and Dendra2-ZitP1-43 or Dendra2-ZitP. The top panel indicates the number of PopZ foci per cell when mCherry-PopZ is co-expressed with Dendra2-ZitP1-43 (blue) (n = 151) or Dendra2-ZitP (red) (n = 502). The bottom left and right panels show the relative position of foci (n = 502) along longitudinal axis of mCherry-PopZ foci in cells co-expressing Dendra2-ZitP1-43 (middle, for cells having one focus) or Dendra2-ZitP (right, for cells having two foci). Position 0 reflects one pole and position one the opposite pole. (B) C. crescentus PopZΔ26 still interacts with C. crescentus ZitP in E. coli. Overlays of Dendra2- and/or mCherry-fluorescence with phase contrast images of E. coli TB28 cells expressing Dendra2-ZitP1-43 (left, upper panel) or Dendra2-ZitP1-133 (left, bottom panel) in the presence of mCherry-PopZ (middle panel). Co-localized red and green foci appear yellow in the overlay (right panel). Cells were grown in LB media for 2 hr, then expression of Dendra2-ZitP1-43 variants and mCherry-PopZ was induced with 1 mM IPTG and 0.2% L-arabinose, respectively, for 2 hr. (C) Biochemical fractionation of ZitP from extracts of cells expressing Dendra2-ZitP1-133 or Dendra2-ZitP1-43. Expression of Dendra2-ZitP1-43 or Dendra2-ZitP1-133 integrated at the chromosomal xylX locus was induced for 4 hr by the addition of 0.3% xylose. The cells were lysed by sonication (CE, cell extract) and the soluble fraction (S) was separated from the membrane fraction (pellet, P) by centrifugation. This fraction (P) was taken up in re-suspension buffer (control) with or without a 2 M NaCl final buffer (NaCl) or 1% Triton X-100 (Triton X-100). After centrifugation, the soluble fraction (S) and insoluble fraction (P) were collected. All the fractions were analysed by immunoblotting using antibodies to the ZitP (NTD) (top), DivJ as a membrane protein control (middle panel) and CtrA as a soluble protein control (bottom panel).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20640.013
Figure 5—figure supplement 2
Steady-state levels of PopZ and ZitP variants upon co-overexpression in C.crescentus.

Immunoblots showing the steady-state levels of C. crescentus ZitP or ZitP derivatives co-expressed with C. crescentus PopZ from Pxyl on pMT464 in C. crescentus WT cells. WT harbouring empty pMT464 was used as a control. The blot shown in the top panel was probed with polyclonal antibodies to the ZitP N-terminal domain (NTD). The blot in the lower panel shows the same blot re-probed with the polyclonal antibodies to PopZ. Note that endogenous ZitP and PopZ expressed from the zitP and popZ locus, respectively, are not detectable on this exposure due to the strong overproduction of the ZitP variants and PopZ from the high-copy plasmid.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20640.014
Conservation of PopZ•ZitP localization and activity (A) Overlays of CFP- and mCherry-fluorescence with phase contrast images of C.

crescentus popZ::mCherry-popZ parB::CFP-parB cells over-expressing ZitP1-104 from R. massiliae (upper panel) or B. diminuta (lower panel) from Pxyl on a multi-copy plasmid (pMT464). mCherry-PopZ and CFP-ParB are expressed from the chromosome in lieu of the untagged versions. ZitP1-104 over-expression was induced by the addition of 0.3% xylose for 6 hr prior to imaging. (B) Overlays of CFP- and mCherry-fluorescence with phase contrast images of C. crescentus popZ::mCherry-popZ parB::CFP-parB cells over-expressing ZitP1-104 from R. massiliae with C. crescentus PopZ. Over-expression was induced by the addition of 0.3% xylose for 6 hr prior to imaging. (C) Overlays of Dendra2-fluorescence with phase contrast images of the R. massiliae (Rm) ZitP ZnR version expressed from the xylX locus in WT and ΔpopZ C. crescentus cells. Synthesis of the Dendra2-ZitP1-43(WT)Rm or Dendra2-ZitP1-43(W35I) Rm was induced for 4 hr with 0.3% xylose before imaging. (D) Overlays of Dendra2- and/or mCherry-fluorescence with phase contrast images of E. coli TB28 cells expressing R. massiliae (Rm) Dendra2-ZitP1-43(WT) (upper panels), Dendra2-ZitP1-43(W35I) (lower panel) in the presence of mCherry-tagged PopZ from C. crescentus. Cells were grown in LB for 2 hr, then Dendra2-ZitP1-43 variants and mCherry-PopZ were induced with 1 mM IPTG and 0.2% L-arabinose, respectively, for 2 hr. (E) Overlay of mCherry-fluorescence with phase contrast images of E. coli TB28 cells co-expressing mCherry-ZitP1-104Rm from R. massiliae (Rm) with C. crescentus PopZ from Para encoded on the same pBAD22-derived plasmid. Cells were grown in LB for 2 hr, then expression of mCherry-ZitP1-104Rm and PopZ was induced with 0.2% L-arabinose for 2 hr before imaging. (F) Overlays of Dendra2- and/or mCherry-fluorescence with phase contrast images of E. coli TB28 cells expressing C. crescentus Dendra2-ZitP1-43 (Cc) in the presence of mCherry-PopZ from R. massiliae (Rm). Cells were grown in LB for 2 hr, then Dendra2-ZitP1-43 and mCherry-PopZ were induced with 1 mM IPTG and 0.2% L-arabinose, respectively, for 2 hr. (G) Images of E. coli cells co-expressing C. crescentus Dendra2-ZitP1-43 (Cc, upper panel) or Dendra2-ZitP full-length (Cc, bottom panel) and PopZ from R. massiliae (Rm). Fluorescence (Dendra2) images (left panels) and overlays between phase contrast and Dendra2 fluorescence images (right panels) are shown. Cells were grown in LB to during 2 hr, then Dendra2-ZitP1-43 variants were induced with 1 mM IPTG and PopZ was induced with 0.2% L-arabinose for 2 hr. (H) The (bi)polar PopZ•ZitP complex of free-living (Caulobacterales) and obligate intracellular (Rickettsiales) α-proteobacteria. Pink dots denote PopZ monomers that assemble into a bipolar or monopolar patch, while blue dots denote ZitP molecules. An obligate intracellular rickettsial (rod with bipolar PopZ) cell is depicted within a vacuole (dashed structure) of a host cell (closed structure) and presumed also to polarize PopZ•ZitP (grey arrow). As ZitP is not present in the Rhizobiales, another mechanism of PopZ control is likely operational to drive it into a monopolar disposition. Similarly, we suggest that PopZ localization in C. crescentus can be accomplished by another pathway that operates independently of ZitP and likely involves ParAB and/or another pathway (see Discussion).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20640.015

Additional files

Supplementary file 1

NMR and refinement statistics of ZitP(1-43).

Data used to derive the NMR solution structure.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20640.016
Supplementary file 2

List of strains, plasmids and oligonucleotides.

Details on strain and plasmid constructions and the oligonucleotides that were used.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20640.017

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Matthieu Bergé
  2. Sébastien Campagne
  3. Johann Mignolet
  4. Seamus Holden
  5. Laurence Théraulaz
  6. Suliana Manley
  7. Frédéric H-T Allain
  8. Patrick H Viollier
(2016)
Modularity and determinants of a (bi-)polarization control system from free-living and obligate intracellular bacteria
eLife 5:e20640.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20640