1. Cell Biology
  2. Immunology
Download icon

Glycolysis and glutaminolysis cooperatively control T cell function by limiting metabolite supply to N-glycosylation

Research Article
Cited
4
Views
1,401
Comments
0
Cite as: eLife 2017;6:e21330 doi: 10.7554/eLife.21330

Abstract

Rapidly proliferating cells switch from oxidative phosphorylation to aerobic glycolysis plus glutaminolysis, markedly increasing glucose and glutamine catabolism. Although Otto Warburg first described aerobic glycolysis in cancer cells >90 years ago, the primary purpose of this metabolic switch remains controversial. The hexosamine biosynthetic pathway requires glucose and glutamine for de novo synthesis of UDP-GlcNAc, a sugar-nucleotide that inhibits receptor endocytosis and signaling by promoting N-acetylglucosamine branching of Asn (N)-linked glycans. Here, we report that aerobic glycolysis and glutaminolysis co-operatively reduce UDP-GlcNAc biosynthesis and N-glycan branching in mouse T cell blasts by starving the hexosamine pathway of glucose and glutamine. This drives growth and pro-inflammatory TH17 over anti-inflammatory-induced T regulatory (iTreg) differentiation, the latter by promoting endocytic loss of IL-2 receptor-α (CD25). Thus, a primary function of aerobic glycolysis and glutaminolysis is to co-operatively limit metabolite supply to N-glycan biosynthesis, an activity with widespread implications for autoimmunity and cancer.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21330.001

Introduction

Under anaerobic conditions oxidative phosphorylation is blocked, forcing cells to generate ATP by converting glucose to lactate via glycolysis. This is a highly inefficient use of glucose, generating only 2 ATP per glucose instead of 36–38 ATP per glucose with complete oxidation. Yet under aerobic conditions, rapidly dividing cells such as T cells paradoxically switch their metabolism from oxidative phosphorylation to aerobic glycolysis and glutaminolysis, where glucose is fermented to lactate despite the presence of oxygen (Wang et al., 1976; Warburg et al., 1927; Warburg et al., 1924) and primary carbon flux into the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA cycle) is switched from glucose to glutamine (DeBerardinis et al., 2007). The function of this metabolic switch has remained obscure since Otto Warburg first reported that cancer cells ferment glucose to lactate despite the presence of oxygen (aerobic glycolysis) over 90 years ago (Warburg et al., 1927; Warburg et al., 1924). Glucose metabolites generated by glycolysis are precursors for nucleotide, amino acid and lipid biosynthetic pathways, leading some to suggest that increased glucose uptake may serve to promote the biomass required for rapid cell division (Lunt and Vander Heiden, 2011; Vander Heiden et al., 2009). However, these biosynthetic pathways account for <10% of the increase in glucose uptake induced by the Warburg effect (DeBerardinis et al., 2007; Hume et al., 1978), implying other critical functions. Alternatively, constraining oxidative phosphorylation in rapidly dividing cells may serve to limit cellular damage from reactive oxygen species (Le et al., 2010). This hypothesis is questioned by the observation that genetically blocking lactate production in lung cancer does not activate oxidative phosphorylation in vivo yet still induces disease regression (Xie et al., 2014).

In contrast to cancer, T cells provide an excellent physiologic model to investigate the normal function of aerobic glycolysis and glutaminolysis. Indeed, aerobic glycolysis and glutaminolysis have recently been suggested to promote pro-inflammatory IFNγ synthesis and TH1 differentiation (Chang et al., 2013; Gubser et al., 2013; Klysz et al., 2015), respectively. Aerobic glycolysis also promotes anti-tumor T cell activity and differentiation into pro-inflammatory T helper 17 (TH17) over anti-inflammatory T regulatory (Treg) cells (Ho et al., 2015; Michalek et al., 2011; Shi et al., 2011). Several of these studies implicated specific pathway enzymes or metabolites, such as GAPDH, α-ketoglutarate and phosphoenolpyruvate, for control of IFNγ translation, TH1 differentiation and intracellular Ca2+ flux, respectively. However, these mechanisms are not easily generalizable to other cell types and/or do not consider the global consequences of metabolite shifts or the combined effects of aerobic glycolysis and glutaminolysis.

Asn (N)-linked protein glycosylation utilizes both glucose (Sharma et al., 2014) and glutamine, yet surprisingly, this pathway has not been investigated as a target of aerobic glycolysis and/or glutaminolysis. Branched N-glycans bind galectins at the cell surface to simultaneously inhibit the endocytosis and signaling of multiple surface receptors and transporters, thereby controlling cell growth, differentiation and disease states such as autoimmunity, cancer and type 2 diabetes (Demetriou et al., 2001; Dennis et al., 2009; Granovsky et al., 2000; Lau et al., 2007; Mkhikian et al., 2011; Ohtsubo et al., 2005; Partridge et al., 2004; Zhou et al., 2014). In T cells, N-glycan branching regulates development, growth, differentiation and autoimmunity by altering T cell receptor clustering/signaling, surface retention/localization of CD4, CD8, CD45 and CTLA-4, and the differentiation into pro-inflammatory TH1 over anti-inflammatory TH2 cells (Chen et al., 2009, 2007; Demetriou et al., 2001; Lau et al., 2007; Morgan et al., 2004; Zhou et al., 2014).

Branching in N-glycans depends on UDP-GlcNAc biosynthesis via the hexosamine pathway (Dennis et al., 2009; Grigorian et al., 2011, 2007; Lau et al., 2007; Mkhikian et al., 2016). De novo synthesis of UDP-GlcNAc, the sugar-nucleotide donor substrate required by the N-glycan branching Golgi enzymes Mgat1, 2, 4 and 5, begins with the conversion of fructose-6-phosphate to glucosamine-6-phosphate by the rate-limiting enzyme glutamine-fructose-6-phosphate transaminase (GFPT, Figure 1A). Fructose-6-phosphate is derived from glucose by the action of hexokinase/glucokinase (HK) followed by glucose-6-phosphate isomerase (GPI) and is the critical entry step into glycolysis via the key regulatory enzyme phosphofructokinase 1 (PFK1) (Figure 1A). GFPT also requires glutamine as an amine donor to generate glucosamine-6-phosphate from fructose-6-phosphate. Thus, the hexosamine pathway may be in direct competition with glycolysis and glutaminolysis for fructose-6-phosphate and glutamine, respectively. Here, we test the hypothesis that aerobic glycolysis and glutaminolysis cooperatively starve the hexosamine pathway of both glucose and glutamine, thereby reducing de novo UDP-GlcNAc biosynthesis and N-glycan branching, the latter altering cell function.

Figure 1 with 2 supplements see all
N-glycan branching controls TH17 versus iTreg cell fate.

(A) Fructose 6-phosphate and glutamine may be metabolized by glycolysis and glutaminolysis, respectively, or enter the hexosamine pathway to supply UDP-GlcNAc to the Golgi branching enzymes Mgat1, 2, 4 and 5. HK: hexokinase, GPI: glucose-6-phosphate isomerase, PFK1: phosphofructokinase1, LDH: Lactate dehydrogenase, GFPT: glutamine-fructose-6-phosphate transaminase. (BH) Flow cytometry (B,EH), Western blot (C) and LC-MS/MS (D) analysis of purified mouse splenic CD4+ T-cells activated with anti-CD3+anti-CD28 for 4 days (B,EH) or 3 days (C,D) with TH17 inducing conditions (TGFβ+IL-6+IL-23) or as indicated. PFK1-L (liver), PFK1-P (platelet), PFK1-M (muscle). (G) Co-incubation with doxycycline in vitro. (H) Doxycycline treatment in vivo, with Mgat1f/ftetO-Cre+ROSArtTA cells in right panel gated on L-PHA population. (B,EH) gated on CD4+. (B,DH) Unpaired two tailed t-test with Welch’s (E) and Bonferroni corrections (B,E). **p<0.01; ***p<0.001. Data are mean ± s.e.m of triplicate cultures and representative of n ≥ 3 experiments. MFI, mean fluorescence intensity.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21330.002

Results

TH17 cytokines lower UDP-GlcNAc biosynthesis and N-glycan branching

To initially explore our hypothesis, we investigated whether aerobic glycolysis regulates branching during the differentiation of T cells into pro-inflammatory TH17 cells. Induction of TH17 differentiation strongly induces aerobic glycolysis, but when glycolysis is inhibited, cell fate is switched from pro-inflammatory TH17 to anti-inflammatory iTreg cells by an unknown mechanism (Shi et al., 2011). If aerobic glycolysis starves the hexosamine pathway of fructose-6-phosphate, TH17 cytokines are expected to decrease branching via reduced biosynthesis of UDP-GlcNAc. To evaluate this possibility, we performed flow cytometry with L-PHA (Phaseolus vulgaris, leukoagglutinin), a plant lectin that binds specifically to β1,6 GlcNAc-branched N-glycans made by the Mgat5 enzyme and serves as a gauge of overall branching (Cummings and Kornfeld, 1982; Demetriou et al., 2001; Zhou et al., 2014). Strikingly, TH17 inducing cytokines (TGFβ+IL-6+IL-23) acted synergistically to markedly reduce L-PHA binding in activated T cells by ~3–4 fold, despite each cytokine individually having minimal effects (Figure 1B, Figure 1—figure supplement 1A). Consistent with reduced branching TH17 inducing cytokines also significantly reduced binding of E-PHA (Phaseolus vulgaris, erthroagglutinin) while increasing the binding of ConA (Concanavalin A), plant lectins that bind bisecting and high-mannose N-glycans, respectively (Figure 1—figure supplement 1B). Reduced branching should also decrease galectin binding and indeed, TH17 inducing cytokines markedly reduced the binding of galectin-3 to activated T cells (Figure 1—figure supplement 1B). As only a ~20% change in branching is sufficient to alter T cell growth (Lee et al., 2007; Mkhikian et al., 2011; Zhou et al., 2014), the reduction induced by TH17 inducing cytokines is highly significant. Although branching was reduced, mRNA expression of the Golgi branching genes Mgat1 and Mgat5 were unchanged or increased, consistent with reduced UDP-GlcNAc supply being primarily responsible for lowering branching (Figure 1—figure supplement 1C). Indeed, while T cell activation markedly increases protein expression of GFPT1 as well as the critical glycolytic enzymes HK1, GPI and PFK1 isoenzymes (liver, platelet and muscle), GFPT1 is uniquely and specifically down-regulated by TH17 cytokines (Figure 1C). GFPT2 is an isoenzyme of GFPT1 but is not detectable by Western blot in T cells (data not shown). As GFPT1 and the three PFK1 isoenzymes all utilize fructose-6-phosphate, the reduction in GFPT1 induced by TH17 cytokines should favor glucose flux into glycolysis over the hexosamine pathway. Indeed, UDP-GlcNAc production is reduced by TH17 cytokines (Figure 1D, Figure 1—figure supplement 1D). Together, these data demonstrate that TH17 cytokines reduce UDP-GlcNAc production, branching and GFPT1 expression, the rate-limiting enzyme for entry of fructose-6-phosphate into the hexosamine pathway.

N-glycan branching induces a cell fate switch from TH17 to iTreg

Next, we examined whether TGFβ+IL-6+IL-23 induced reductions in UDP-GlcNAc and branching was required for TH17 differentiation. To test this hypothesis, we bypassed the effects of GFPT1 competition for fructose-6-phosphate by exploiting the hexosamine salvage pathway, where N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) is used to generate UDP-GlcNAc directly (Figure 1A) (Grigorian et al., 2007; Lau et al., 2007). GlcNAc is metabolically inert within cells and does not enter glycolysis, the TCA cycle or the pentose phosphate pathway (Wellen et al., 2010). Supplementing T cells with GlcNAc reversed the reduction in branching induced by TH17 cytokines and markedly inhibited TH17 differentiation (Figure 1E,F). Remarkably, GlcNAc supplementation not only blocked TH17 differentiation but also induced a cell fate switch to iTreg cells, despite the presence of TH17-inducing cytokines (Figure 1F). The mannosidase I inhibitor kifunensine (Figure 1A) blocks branching (Figure 1—figure supplement 1E) and reversed the effects of GlcNAc supplementation, confirming that raising UDP-GlcNAc levels with GlcNAc supplementation blocked TH17 and promoted iTreg differentiation by restoring branching (Figure 1—figure supplement 1F). Oral delivery of GlcNAc to mice with Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis, a model of multiple sclerosis, blocked disease progression, raised branching in T cells and suppressed TH17 in vivo (Grigorian et al., 2011).

To confirm this result genetically, we utilized the tet-on system to generate a mouse with inducible expression of the Golgi branching enzyme Mgat5 (ROSArtTAMgat5tet). Indeed, directly raising branching via transgenic over-expression of Mgat5 also induced a cell fate switch from TH17 to iTreg cells despite TH17-inducing cytokines (Figure 1G, Figure 1—figure supplement 2A). The magnitude of this change was less than that of GlcNAc supplementation, consistent with reduced de novo synthesis of UDP-GlcNAc by aerobic glycolysis primarily limiting branching. Directly inhibiting branching should have the opposite effect of raising branching and indeed, blocking branching by culturing cells with kifunensine or by inducing deficiency of the branching enzymes Mgat1 (via doxycycline treatment of Mgat1f/ftetO-Cre+ROSArtTA mice, Figure 1—figure supplement 2B) (Zhou et al., 2014) or Mgat5 (Mgat5-/-) (Demetriou et al., 2001) all significantly enhanced TH17 induction (Figure 1H, Figure 1—figure supplements 1F and 2C). These data confirm that reduced UDP-GlcNAc production and branching induced by TH17 cytokines is required for TH17 differentiation and serves to block iTreg differentiation.

N-glycan branching promotes IL-2Rα signaling to drive iTreg over TH17 differentiation

Interleukin-2 (IL-2) suppresses TH17 and promotes iTreg differentiation (Davidson et al., 2007; Laurence et al., 2007). As branching promotes surface retention of multiple receptors (Dennis et al., 2009), we investigated whether reduced branching limits IL-2 signaling via decreased surface retention of the IL-2 receptor. Blocking branching during TH17 induction via Mgat1 deletion markedly reduced surface expression and retention of CD25, the high-affinity alpha subunit of the IL-2 receptor (Figure 2A, Figure 2—figure supplement 1A,B). Up-regulation of branching via GlcNAc supplementation or Mgat5 over-expression had the opposite effect, raising CD25 surface levels (Figure 2B,C, Figure 2—figure supplement 1C,D). In contrast, IL-2 cytokine levels were not significantly altered by GlcNAc or kifunensine (Figure 2—figure supplement 1E). The IL-2 receptor signals via STAT5 and this is markedly reduced by TH17 cytokines (Figure 2D). GlcNAc supplementation restored pSTAT5 signaling despite TH17 conditions (Figure 2D). Sequestering endogenous IL-2 with anti-IL-2 antibody blocked the ability of GlcNAc to switch cell fate from TH17 to iTreg, suggesting that IL-2 is required for branching to promote iTreg over TH17 differentiation (Figure 2E, Figure 2—figure supplement 1F). Moreover, inhibiting branching with Mgat1 deficiency or kifunensine blocked the ability of exogenous IL-2 to induce a cell fate switch from TH17 to iTreg (Figure 2F, Figure 2—figure supplement 1G,H). Taken together, these data indicate that TH17 cytokine-induced down-regulation of GFPT1, UDP-GlcNAc and branching drive TH17 over iTreg differentiation by lowering CD25 surface retention and IL-2 signaling.

Figure 2 with 1 supplement see all
N-glycan branching controls TH17 versus iTreg cell fate via IL-2Rα (CD25).

(A–F) Flow cytometry (A–C,E,F) and Western blot (D) analysis of mouse splenic CD4+ T-cells activated with anti-CD3+anti-CD28 under TH17-inducing conditions (TGFβ+IL-6+IL-23) for 3 days (D) or 4 days (A–C,E,F); cells gated on CD4+. (A,F) Doxycycline treatment in vivo with Mgat1f/ftetO-Cre+ROSArtTA cells gated on L-PHA population. (C) CD25 MFI in Mgat5tetOROSArtTA CD4+ T cells normalized to ROSrtTA CD4+ T cells, both treated in vitro with doxycycline. (E,F) ratio of IL-17A+ to FoxP3+ CD4+ cells. (A,B,E,F) Unpaired two-tailed t-test with Welch’s (A,E) and Bonferroni corrections (E,F). (C) Linear regression. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001. Data are mean ± s.e.m of triplicate cultures and representative of n ≥ 3 experiments. MFI, mean fluorescence intensity.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21330.005

Aerobic glycolysis drives TH17 over iTreg differentiation by lowering N-glycan branching

Next, we investigated whether aerobic glycolysis was required for TH17 differentiation. Branching promotes surface retention of glucose transporters (Lau et al., 2007; Ohtsubo et al., 2005). Consistent with this, glucose uptake under TH17-inducing conditions was enhanced by GlcNAc and inhibited by kifunensine, as measured by intracellular staining for the glucose analog 2-NBDG (Figure 3—figure supplement 1A). This suggests that GlcNAc supplementation does not directly inhibit aerobic glycolysis. Indeed, under TH17 inducing conditions, GlcNAc supplementation did not significantly alter the glycolytic state of the cells prior to differentiation, as measured by the extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) and oxygen consumption rate (OCR) at day 2 of culture (Figure 3A, Figure 3—figure supplement 1B). This suggests that catabolism of fructose-6-phosphate to lactate is not necessary to drive TH17 differentiation. To confirm this, we directly limited glucose flux into glycolysis by forcing oxidative phosphorylation using either the glycolytic inhibitor rapamycin or media supplemented with galactose instead of glucose (Chang et al., 2013). Rapamycin inhibits mTOR (mechanistic Target of Rapamycin) signaling via binding to mTOR complex 1, thereby reducing HIF-1α expression (Land and Tee, 2007), a transcription factor that up-regulates glycolysis enzymes including HK, PGM and PFK1 (Semenza et al., 1994). Galactose is much more slowly converted to pyruvate than glucose, forcing cells to up-regulate oxidative phosphorylation at the expense of glycolysis (Chang et al., 2013). Rapamycin and galactose both lowered aerobic glycolysis, enhanced branching and drove iTreg over TH17 differentiation (Figure 3B–G). Importantly, the latter was reversed with Mgat1 deficiency or kifunensine (Figure 3F,G, Figure 3—figure supplement 1C,D), demonstrating that the increase in branching induced by blocking glycolysis was necessary to switch cell fate from TH17 to iTreg. Rapamycin had little effect on GFPT1 levels, while galactose marginally increased GFPT1, consistent with glycolysis largely acting by metabolically limiting flux of fructose-6-phosphate to the hexosamine/branching pathway rather than altering enzyme expression (Figure 3E). Importantly, kifunensine did not reverse the inhibition of aerobic glycolysis induced by rapamycin and galactose (Figure 3B,C), establishing that TH17 differentiation does not require aerobic glycolysis beyond its effects on branching. 2-Deoxy-D-glucose is another commonly used inhibitor of glycolysis; however, this molecule is also 2-deoxy-D-mannose and inhibits N-glycan biosynthesis via incorporation of 2-deoxy-D-mannose into the lipid-linked oligosaccharide precursor (Zhang et al., 2014). Indeed, 2-deoxy-D-glucose/2-deoxy-D-mannose reduced branching and promoted TH17 differentiation (Figure 3—figure supplement 1F,G), consistent with branching being dominant over aerobic glycolysis in controlling TH17 differentiation. Taken together, these data demonstrate that a primary function of aerobic glycolysis during TH17 differentiation is to lower branching by starving the hexosamine pathway of fructose-6-phosphate substrate availability.

Figure 3 with 1 supplement see all
Glycolysis promotes TH17 over iTreg cell fate by inhibiting N-glycan branching.

(A–C) Ratio of the oxygen consumption rate (OCR) to the extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) of purified splenic CD4+ T cells at rest or activated with anti-CD3+anti-CD28 for 2 days with TH17 cytokines (TGFβ+IL-6+IL-23) or as indicated. (D–G) Flow cytometry analysis of purified mouse splenic CD4+ T-cells activated with anti-CD3+anti-CD28 for 4 days under TH17-inducing conditions (TGFβ+IL-6+IL-23). (F (right panel), G) ratio of IL-17A+ to Foxp3+ CD4+ T cells, with Mgat1f/ftetO-Cre+ROSArtTA cells gated on L-PHA- population. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001. NS, not significant. (A–G), Unpaired two-tailed t-test with Welch's (B,C,F,G) and Bonferroni correction (A–C,F,G). Data are mean ± s.e.m and n = 3. MFI, mean fluorescence intensity.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21330.007

Oxidative phosphorylation drives iTreg differentiation by enhancing N-glycan branching

iTreg cells induced by TGFβ alone are non-glycolytic and utilize lipid oxidation for ATP production (Michalek et al., 2011; Shi et al., 2011). Based on our model that glycolysis and the hexosamine pathway compete for fructose-6-phosphate, lipid oxidation should favor flux of fructose-6-phosphate into the hexosamine pathway over glycolysis and thereby increase UDP-GlcNAc, branching and iTreg differentiation via IL-2/CD25/STAT5 signaling. Indeed, abolishing branching via Mgat1 deficiency virtually eliminated iTreg differentiation induced by TGFβ (Figure 4A, Figure 4—figure supplement 1A). iTreg differentiation was also inhibited by Mgat5 deficiency and kifunensine (Figure 4B,C), while raising branching with GlcNAc had the opposite effect (Figure 4C, Figure 4—figure supplement 1B). Kifunensine reversed the effects of GlcNAc, confirming GlcNAc promoted iTreg by raising branching (Figure 4C). Treatment with etomoxir (ETX), a specific inhibitor of fatty acid oxidation (Michalek et al., 2011), should up-regulate glycolysis and thereby limit flux of fructose-6-phosphate into the hexosamine pathway. Indeed, etomoxir decreased branching, CD25 surface expression and iTreg generation; phenotypes reversed by GlcNAc supplementation (Figure 4D–F). Taken together, these data confirm that oxidative phosphorylation promotes iTreg differentiation by limiting utilization of fructose-6-phosphate by glycolysis and thereby promoting flux of fructose-6–phosphate into the hexosamine pathway.

Figure 4 with 1 supplement see all
Oxidative phosphorylation promotes iTreg generation by enhancing N-glycan branching.

(A–F) Flow cytometry of purified splenic CD4+ T cells activated with anti-CD3+anti-CD28 and TGFβ1 for 4 days; gated on CD4+. (A), Mgat1f/ftetO-Cre+ROSArtTA cells gated on L-PHA- population from mice treated with doxycycline in vivo. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001. (A–F) Unpaired two-tailed t-test with Bonferroni (C–F) and Welch’s (C,E,F) correction. Data are mean ± s.e.m and n = 3. MFI, mean fluorescence intensity.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21330.009

Aerobic glycolysis promotes T cell growth by lowering N-glycan branching

Branching inhibits T cell growth by reducing T cell receptor clustering/signaling and promoting surface retention of the growth inhibitor CTLA-4 (Demetriou et al., 2001; Lau et al., 2007; Mkhikian et al., 2011). In the absence of polarizing cytokines, TCR stimulation also increases glucose uptake and induces aerobic glycolysis. However, in contrast to TH17 cells, GFPT1 is markedly up-regulated in neutral T cell blasts (Figure 1C). Thus, increased GFPT1 should be better at competing with PFK1 for the increased supply of fructose-6-phosphate to promote UPD-GlcNAc production. Coupled with increased expression of multiple Golgi branching enzymes in T cell blasts (Chen et al., 2009), this should promote branching in neutral T cell blasts relative to resting cells. Indeed, we previously observed increased UDP-GlcNAc production and branching in non-polarized T cell blasts relative to resting naive T cells (Lau et al., 2007). However, inhibiting aerobic glycolysis under neutral conditions should further drive fructose-6-phosphate into the hexosamine pathway to promote branching and limit growth of T cell blasts. Indeed, rapamycin and galactose enhanced branching and inhibited T cell growth, effects reversed with the Golgi branching inhibitor kifunensine (Figure 5A–C, Figure 5—figure supplement 1). This indicates that like TH17 differentiation, aerobic glycolysis promotes T cell growth by limiting supply of fructose-6-phosphate to the hexosamine pathway.

Figure 5 with 1 supplement see all
Glycolysis promotes T cell growth by inhibiting N-glycan branching.

(A–C) Flow cytometry of purified splenic CD4+ T cells activated with anti-CD3 for 3 days, gated on CD4+. (B,C) Proliferation measured by CFSE dilution. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001. (A) Unpaired two-tailed t-test with Bonferroni correction. Data are mean ± s.e.m of triplicate cultures and representative of n = 3 experiments. MFI, mean fluorescence intensity.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21330.011

Glutaminolysis drives TH17 over iTreg differentiation by lowering N-glycan branching

Aerobic glycolysis is frequently accompanied by glutaminolysis, where glutamine is metabolized to glutamate by the enzyme glutaminase (DeBerardinis et al., 2007). GFPT1 absolutely requires glutamine as an amine donor to convert fructose-6-phosphate to glucosamine-6-phosphate, the first step of the de novo hexosamine pathway (Figure 1A). This suggests that glutaminolysis may reduce availability of glutamine to the hexosamine pathway, thereby lowering branching to drive TH17 over iTreg differentiation. To examine this possibility, we investigated whether excess exogenous glutamine can reverse the reduction in branching induced by TH17 cytokines and thereby drive iTreg over TH17 differentiation. Indeed, under TH17 conditions excess glutamine raised branching, markedly inhibited TH17 differentiation and induced a cell fate switch to iTreg (Figure 6A,B, Figure 6—figure supplement 1A). These phenotypes were reversed by blocking branching with kifunensine, confirming that excess glutamine acted by raising branching. Similarly, increasing glutamine under iTreg-inducing conditions raised branching and increased iTreg generation in the absence but not in the presence of kifunensine (Figure 6C,D, Figure 6—figure supplement 1B). Blocking glutaminase activity with 6-diazo-5-oxo-L-norleucine (DON) or azaserine should increase glutamine supply to GFPT1. Indeed, both glutaminase inhibitors enhanced branching and induced a cell fate switch from TH17 to iTreg (Figure 6E–J). Klysz et al. reported that glutamine deprivation drives iTreg over TH1 differentiation by reducing glutamine catabolism to α-ketoglutarate, a conclusion suggested by the ability of the α-ketoglutarate analog dimethyl-2-oxoglutarate (DMK) to restore TH1 over iTreg differentiation in the presence of glutamine deprivation (Klysz et al., 2015). In contrast, we observed that DMK did not reverse the effects of glutaminase inhibition by DON on branching or TH17 induction (Figure 6E,G). However, DMK did induce a partial rescue of iTreg generation (Figure 6I). Moreover, blocking branching with kifunensine only partially reversed the effects of DON and Azaserine on TH17 versus iTreg generation (Figure 6G–J). Together, these data indicate that glutamine availability regulates branching to affect TH17 versus iTreg differentiation, but other factors such as catabolism of glutamine to α-ketoglutarate likely also play a role.

Figure 6 with 1 supplement see all
Glutaminolysis promotes TH17 over iTreg cell fate by inhibiting N-glycan branching.

(A–J) Flow cytometry of purified splenic CD4+ T cells activated with anti-CD3+anti-CD28 under TH17-inducing conditions (TGFβ+IL-6+IL-23) (A,B,E–J) or in the presence of TGFβ (C,D). Gated on CD4+. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001. (A–D,G–J) Unpaired one-tailed t-test with Welch's (G,I,J) and Bonferroni (B,D,G–J) correction. Data are mean ± s.e.m and n = 3. MFI, mean fluorescence intensity.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21330.013

Discussion

It has been over 90 years since Otto Warburg’s seminal discovery that cancer cells switch their metabolism from oxidative phosphorylation to aerobic glycolysis (Warburg et al., 1927; Warburg et al., 1924). Rapidly proliferating mammalian cells paradoxically stop the complete oxidation of glucose and instead ferment glucose to lactate while using glutamine rather than glucose to supply the TCA cycle. This extracts 18-fold less energy per glucose molecule while markedly increasing catabolism of glutamine, changes that should limit glucose and glutamine flux into other pathways. Indeed, our data support a model where a primary function of aerobic glycolysis and glutaminolysis is to co-operatively limit the flux of glucose and glutamine into the hexosamine pathway, thereby inhibiting N-glycan branching and associated down-stream phenotypes.

In T cells, reduced branching induced by aerobic glycolysis and glutaminolysis promotes pro-inflammatory TH17 differentiation over anti-inflammatory iTreg differentiation. Restoring branching and UDP-GlcNAc levels via salvage of N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) into the hexosamine pathway does not alter the glycolytic state of the cell, yet switches cell fate from TH17 to iTreg cells by blocking endocytic loss of IL-2 receptor-α (CD25). Forcing oxidative phosphorylation raises branching to drive iTreg over TH17 differentiation. Blocking the increase in branching reverses the latter phenotypes, demonstrating that aerobic glycolysis is not essential for T cell growth/differentiation control beyond regulation of branching. We conclude that metabolic switches between oxidative phosphorylation and aerobic glycolysis plus glutaminolysis primarily target hexosamine/N-glycosylation via altered glucose and glutamine flux and as a consequence, influence T cell differentiation and growth.

GlcNAc has recently been reported to promote glucose, glutamine, and fatty acid uptake in liver and/or adipose tissue via branching induced increases in surface retention of metabolite transporters (Ryczko et al., 2016). Similarly, we observed that modifying branching in T cells with GlcNAc or kifunensine altered glucose uptake. However, GlcNAc or kifunensine did not acutely alter the metabolic state of the T cell, as measured by the oxygen consumption rate and extracellular acidification rate. Consistent with this, we have previously shown that lowering branching does not alter UDP-GlcNAc levels in T cells (Mkhikian et al., 2016). GlcNAc does raise UDP-GlcNAc levels, which may impact other glycan pathways such as O-glycans, O-GlcNAc or CMP-sialic scid, in addition to N-glycan branching. However, the effects of GlcNAc on T cell differentiation were reversed by directly blocking Golgi branching activity, confirming that the effects of raised UDP-GlcNAc were predominantly through branching rather than other pathways. Moreover, blocking the effects of the metabolic modulators rapamycin, galactose or etoximer on branching reversed their effects on T cell differentiation despite not reversing effects on metabolism. In this manner, T cell differentiation can be decoupled from the metabolic state of the cell by manipulating branching. However, our data does not exclude metabolically driven changes in other pathways and indeed, the effects of glutaminolysis on branching appear to only partially explain the phenotype.

The competition between PFK1 and GFPT for fructose-6-phosphate is essential for determining the extent of glucose flux into the hexosamine/branching pathways. During TH17 differentiation, GFPT1 is down-regulated and PFK1 dominates, restricting glucose flux into the hexosamine pathway and lowering branching relative to neutral T cell blasts. In contrast, GFPT1 is up-regulated in neutral T cell blasts, allowing increases in glucose uptake to raise de novo UDP-GlcNAc production and branching relative to resting cells (Lau et al., 2007); however, aerobic glycolysis still functions to limit the extent of glucose flux into the hexosamine pathway and thereby functions to promote growth.

The Warburg effect was first described in cancer cells, where branching and Mgat5 are pathologically over-expressed and serve as essential drivers of growth, motility and metastasis (Granovsky et al., 2000; Lau et al., 2007; Partridge et al., 2004). N-glycan branching and the hexosamine pathway promote epithelial to mesenchymal transition and tumor growth by regulating surface expression of receptor tyrosine kinases and TGFβ receptors (Demetriou et al., 1995; Lau et al., 2007; Partridge et al., 2004). While oncogenes such as Kras have been reported to turn on hexosamine and N-glycan pathway genes (Ying et al., 2012), the functional connection between aerobic glycolysis and hexosamine/branching in cancer has not been established. GFPT expression is elevated in a number of cancers (Itkonen et al., 2013; Ying et al., 2012) (R. Zhou and M. Demetriou, unpublished data), where it is expected to promote flux of glucose into the hexosamine pathway and branching. Our data in T cells suggest that although increased GFPT and MGAT5 expression in cancer drive UDP-GlcNAc and branching, aerobic glycolysis is expected to do the opposite and limit UDP-GlcNAc expression and branching. The latter would inhibit tumor growth and metastasis, but this phenotype may be masked by up-regulation of GFPT and/or MGAT5. This would parallel our results in neutral T cell blasts, where aerobic glycolysis limits branching yet elevated GFPT and MGAT5 act downstream to increase branching. The functional consequences of aerobic glycolysis and glutaminolysis on branching in cancer merit further investigation.

The ability of GlcNAc to promote iTreg while blocking TH17 differentiation further validates its potential as a therapeutic for autoimmune disorders. We have previously shown that GlcNAc limits T cell activation/growth and when provided orally to mice, inhibits experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, a mouse model of Multiple Sclerosis (MS), as well as autoimmune diabetes in the Non Obese Diabetic mouse model (Grigorian et al., 2011, 2007). GlcNAc has also been given orally (3–6 g/day) to children with refractory inflammatory bowel disease for ~2 years, with 8 of 12 showing clinical improvement without reported toxicities and/or side effects (Salvatore et al., 2000). We have recently observed that serum levels of endogenous GlcNAc are markedly reduced in patients with the progressive form of MS and correlate with clinical disability and imaging measures of neurodegeneration (Alexander Brandt and Michael Demetriou, unpublished data). A pilot study of low-dose oral GlcNAc in MS (3 g/day) increased serum GlcNAc levels and branching in T cells (Barbara Newton and Michael Demetriou, unpublished data). As GlcNAc is a dietary supplement that is for sale ‘over the counter’ in the US, these data suggest that GlcNAc may serve as a safe and inexpensive therapeutic for MS patients and potentially other autoimmune diseases.

In summary, our data brings new clarity to the function of aerobic glycolysis and glutaminolysis and has widespread implications for the role of metabolism in disease states as diverse as autoimmunity and cancer.

Materials and methods

Mice

Mgat5-deficient and doxycycline-inducible Mgat1-deficient mice (Mgat1f/ftetO-Cre+ROSArtTA) were previously described (Demetriou et al., 2001; Zhou et al., 2014). To delete Mgat1 in peripheral T cells, 2 mg/ml doxycycline plus 1% sucrose was provided in the drinking water to Mgat1f/ftetO-Cre+ROSArtTA mice for ≥3 weeks. To generate doxycycline-inducible Mgat5 over-expression mice (Mgat5tetOROSArtTA), the cDNA encoding the mouse Mgat5 (a gift from James Dennis) was sub-cloned into the transgene expression vector pTRE-Tight (Clontech, Mountain View, CA), containing a tet-regulated promoter controlling the expression of the subcloned Mgat5 cDNA (Mgat5tetO). The transgene was microinjected into fertilized C57BL/6 mouse eggs and placed into pseudo-pregnant females. Founder mice were bred with C57BL/6 mice and transgenic offspring were identified by PCR using a PCR primer pair targeting the Tet promoter and Mgat5 transgene (left – CGAGGTAGGCGTGTACGG, right – AGACCGGTTTCCAACAACCT). Transgenic-positive mice were then crossed with ROSArtTA to generate Mgat5tetOROSArtTA mice and detected using primers as per Jackson Laboratory (stock 006965). To overexpress Mgat5 in mouse splenic CD4+ T cells, doxycycline was added to cell culture at 4 μg/ml. All the mice were on the C57BL/6 background.

Mouse T-cell cultures

For TH17 cell induction, purified splenic CD4+ T cells (EasySep Mouse CD4+ T cell isolation kit, StemCell Technologies) were cultured for 4 days with plate-bound anti-CD3ɛ (0.25–5 μg/ml, clone 145–2 C11, eBioscience, San Diego, CA), anti-CD28 (2 μg/ml, clone 37.51, eBioscience), recombinant mouse IL-6 (20 ng/ml, eBioscience), recombinant human TGF-β1 (5 ng/ml, eBioscience), recombinant mouse IL-23 (20 ng/ml, eBioscience), anti-IFNγ (10 μg/ml, clone XMG1.2, eBioscience) and anti IL-4 (10 μg/ml, clone 11B11, eBioscience). For iTreg cell induction, purified splenic CD4+ T cells were cultured for 4 days in the presence of plate-bound anti-CD3ɛ (1 μg/ml), anti-CD28 (2 μg/ml) and rhTGF-β1 (0.625–10 ng/ml). For pharmacological treatments, cells were incubated with vehicle, GlcNAc (40 mM added daily, Wellesley Therapeutics, Toronto, Canada), kifunensine (10 uM, Glycosyn, Wellington, New Zealand), rapamycin (1 nM, EMD Milipore, Temecula, CA), 2-Deoxy-D-glucose (1 mM, Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO), Etomoxir ((Etx)200 µM, Sigma-Aldrich), 2-NBDG (20 µM, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), azaserine (2.5–10 µM, Sigma), 6-diazo-5-oxo-L-norleucine ((DON) 1.75–3.5 µM, Sigma), dimethyl-2-oxoglutarate ((DMK 3.5 mM, Sigma), anti-IL-2 (20 μg/ml eBioscience), Etomoxir and IL-2 (eBioscience). Cytokine production in cell culture supernatants was analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with mouse Ready Set Go! IL-2 assay kits (eBioscience) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Western blot

Western blotting was performed as previously described (Demetriou et al., 2001; Grigorian et al., 2007; Zhou et al., 2014). Cells were stimulated by plate-bound anti-CD3ɛ plus anti-CD28 for 72 hr before lysis. Un-stimulated cells were rested in culture for 12 hr prior to cell lysis. Whole-cell lysates were prepared as previously described (Demetriou et al., 2001; Grigorian et al., 2007; Zhou et al., 2014) and supplemented with Halt Protease Phosphotase Inhibitor (Fisher). Cell lysates were separated by SDS-gel electrophoresis and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (ThermoFisher Scientific). Antibodies to Hexokinase I (Clone C3C54), phospho-Stat5 (Clone D47E7), PFK-L (Catalog #8175), actin (Clone 13E5), Hsp90 (Clone C45G5) and HRP-conjugated rabbit IgG (Catalog #7074) were from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA). Antibodies to PFK-P (Catalog #PA5-28673) and GPI (Catalog #PA5-26787) were from ThermoFisher Scientific. PFK-M (Clone 842735) was from R&D; Systems (Minneapolos, MN). GFPT1 (Clone EPR4854) was from LifeSpan Biosciences (Seattle, WA). Hexokinase I, PFKP, PFKL, PFKM, anti-GFPT1, anti-GPI abundance were calculated by normalization to actin or Hsp90 and relative to control using Image J software as previously described (Zhou et al., 2014).

Analysis of cell metabolism

Cells were harvested after 48 hr of culture and plated on 24-well XF cell culture micro-plates coated with Cell-Tak (Corning, Corning, NY) at a concentration of 22.4 μg/ml in non-buffered RPMI 1640 (containing either 10 mM glucose or 10 mM galactose, 2 mM L-glutamine and 1 mM sodium pyruvate) (Sigma) at a density of 7.5 × 105 cells per well. Using two-step plating, microplates were incubated for 10 min with 100 μl of cells in non-buffered media at 37°C in a non-CO2 incubator. Then, 400 μl of non-buffered media was added to each well and incubated for an additional 20 min. The Extracellular Acidification Rate (ECAR) and Oxygen Consumption Rate (OCR) were measured using an XF24 Extracellular Flux Analyzer (Seahorse Biosciences/Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) under basal conditions.

Flow cytometry and intracellular staining

Flow cytometric analysis was performed as previously described (Demetriou et al., 2001; Grigorian et al., 2007; Zhou et al., 2014). Monoclonal antibodies specific to the following mouse antigens (and labeled with the indicated fluorescent markers) were purchased from eBioscience: IL-17 PE (eBio17B7), Foxp3 APC (Fjk-16s), CD4 PrpCy5.5 (RM4-5), CD25 PE (PC61.5). In addition, FITC L-PHA, FITC E-PHA and FITC ConA (Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA) was used to stain cells. For galectin-3 binding, recombinant mouse galectin-3 (R&D; systems) was labeled using an Alexa Fluor 488 protein labeling kit (ThermoFisher Scientific). Cells were stained for flow cytometry using 3 μg labeled galectin-3 per test. Staining was carried out for 30 min at room temperature followed by one wash and fixation with paraformaldehyde. For the lactose control samples, 50 mM lactose was included in all steps. For intracellular staining, cells were stimulated at 37°C for 5 hr with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (50 ng/ml, Sigma-Aldrich) and ionomycin (750 ng/ml, Sigma-Aldrich) in the presence of GolgiPlug (1 μl per 1 ml cell culture) (BD Biosciences) and stained using the Foxp3 Transcription Factor Fixation/Permeabilization Kit (eBioscience) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Flow cytometry experiments were performed with BD FACS Calibur, LSR II and Attune Acoustic Focusing Cytometer.

Endocytosis assay

Endocytosis assay was assessed as previously described (Mkhikian et al., 2011; Zhou et al., 2014). Briefly, splenocytes were stained with anti-CD25, resuspended in complete RPMI 1640 medium, incubated in a 37°C incubator for 2.5 hr, washed in FACS buffer or acid-wash buffer (150 mM NaCl and 20 mM HCl, pH 1.7) for 3 min at 25°C and then fixed before analyzing by flow cytometry. The acid wash removes surface-bound antibody and the MFI of acid-washed cells is divided by the MFI of FACS buffer washed cells to determine internalized antibody.

UDP-GlcNAc measurement by LC-MS/MS

Purified splenic CD4+ T cells activated for 72 hr in the presence or absence of TH17-inducing conditions were washed twice with ice-cold 1x PBS and counted. 15 × 106 cells were pelleted in 1.5 ml Eppendorf tubes by centrifuging at 350 g for 7 min at 4°C. Metabolites were extracted from the pellets by the addition of 1 ml of ice-cold solution of 40% acetonitrile, 40% methanol and 20% water. The tubes were vortexed for 1 hr at 4°C and spun down at 14,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C (Eppendorf, Germany). The supernatant was transferred to fresh tubes and evaporated to dryness in an Eppendorf Vacufuge at 30°C (Eppendorf, Germany). The dry samples were stored at −80°C until analyzed, at which point they were reconstituted in 100 μl of LC-MS grade water. The samples were run on a Waters (Micromass) Quattro Premier XE LC-MS/MS machine in negative mode with Water:Acetonitrile (+0.2% Acetic Acid and 5 mM Ammonium Acetate) solvent. UPLC with C18 reverse phase column was employed. Area was converted to UDP-GlcNAc concentration using a standard curve simultaneously generated with purified UDP-GlcNAc (Sigma).

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
    Characterization of the structural determinants required for the high affinity interaction of asparagine-linked oligosaccharides with immobilized phaseolus vulgaris leukoagglutinating and erythroagglutinating lectins
    1. RD Cummings
    2. S Kornfeld
    (1982)
    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 257:11230–11234.
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
  21. 21
  22. 22
  23. 23
  24. 24
  25. 25
  26. 26
  27. 27
  28. 28
  29. 29
  30. 30
  31. 31
  32. 32
    Transcriptional regulation of genes encoding glycolytic enzymes by hypoxia-inducible factor 1
    1. GL Semenza
    2. PH Roth
    3. HM Fang
    4. GL Wang
    (1994)
    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 269:23757–23763.
  33. 33
  34. 34
  35. 35
  36. 36
  37. 37
    Biochemische Zeitschrift
    1. O Warburg
    2. K Posener
    3. E Negelein
    (1924)
    319–344, Ueber den stoffwechsel der tumoren, Biochemische Zeitschrift, Berlin, Springer.
  38. 38
  39. 39
  40. 40
  41. 41
  42. 42
  43. 43

Decision letter

  1. James Paulson
    Reviewing Editor; The Scripps Research Institute, United States

In the interests of transparency, eLife includes the editorial decision letter and accompanying author responses. A lightly edited version of the letter sent to the authors after peer review is shown, indicating the most substantive concerns; minor comments are not usually included.

Thank you for submitting your article "Glycolysis and glutaminolysis cooperatively control T cell function by limiting metabolite supply to N-glycosylation" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been favorably evaluated by Michel Nussenzweig (Senior Editor) and three reviewers, one of whom served as Guest Reviewing Editor. The reviewers have opted to remain anonymous.

The reviewers have discussed the reviews with one another and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this decision to help you prepare a revised submission.

General assessment:

This interesting report shows that pro-inflammatory cytokines induce a metabolic switch in T cells to aerobic glycolysis and glutaminolysis that starves the hexosamine pathway, reduces UDP-GlcNAc levels, and as a consequence reduces branching of N-linked glycans that coincides with the differentiation to pro-inflammatory TH17 cells and suppression of iTregs. While the data provide significant insights into the relationship between induction of aerobic catalysis and changes in glycosylation, the reviewers felt that the report implies a causal relationship between branching of N-linked glycans and differentiation of T cells to iTregs that is not fully supported by the data.

Major conclusions:

– TH17 cytokines induces a metabolic switch to aerobic glycolysis, differentiation of pro-inflammatory TH17 cells, and suppression of differentiation to iTreg cells.

– Aerobic glycolysis and reduced glutaminolysis consumes precursors of GlcNAc and UDP-GlcNAc, resulting in reduced branching of N-linked cytokines.

– Bypassing the suppression of N-linked glycan branching in the presence of TH17 cytokines by administering GlcNAc or, to a lesser extent, by increasing the expression of the branching enzyme, Mgat5, restores branching of N-linked glycans and reverses suppression of differentiation to iTregs.

– Causal relationships between N-linked glycan branching and function of surface receptors (e.g. IL2 receptor, CD25) suggest that N-linked glycan branching may play a direct role in driving TH17/ iTreg differentiation.

Required revisions:

The reviewers expressed major concerns about narrowly focusing interpretation of the results, with a bias that N-linked glycan branching controlled T cell differentiation. This was to the exclusion of the potential for branching to be coincidental to factors that induced differentiation or even other aspects of glycosylation that could be playing a principle role (e.g. O-GlcNAc glycosylation). A related concern was the lack of data confirming that changes in N-linked branching was taking place. Changes were only measured with the lectin PHA-L. There was no effort to assess how quantitative the changes in branching were. Addressing these concerns should be a priority in a revised manuscript.

There are several places in the manuscript that suggest the metabolic switch to aerobic glycolysis targets the hexosamine/N-glycosylation pathway to control T cell differentiation. Rather what has been shown is that the downstream effects are a consequence of the switch to aerobic glycolysis. The implication that this metabolic switch occurs to control these events goes beyond what is shown. It is a subtle difference but an important one.

Abstract, bottom line: “and N-glycan branching to control cell function” should be “N-glycan branching that controls cell function”.

Discussion, first paragraph: “aerobic glycolysis and glutaminolysis act in concert to control cell growth and differentiation”.

Discussion, second paragraph, last sentence: “We conclude that metabolic switches… target hexosamine/N-glycosylation… to control T cell differentiation and growth”.

The authors ignore a recent article (PMID 26972830) reporting that providing GlcNAc to mice "increased N-glycan branching" and showed altered glucose homeostasis (increased uptake), hepatic glycogen, lipid metabolism, and response to fasting. In cultured cells they reported "enhanced uptake of glucose, glutamine, and fatty acids" and "enhanced lipid synthesis". These results show that GlcNAc supplementation does not only impact N-glycan branching. It would change N- and O-linked glycan structures (not measured here). GlcNAc can be also epimerized to ManNAc and fuel the sialic acid biosynthetic pathway (not measured here). GlcNAc supplementation and the concomitant increase in glucose uptake would significantly impact O-GlcNAc levels, which alters many cell biological processes, including those of T cell differentiation (not explored here). In other parts of the article they supplement with galactose, but this is known to increase sialylation (PMID 25931375), and supplementation with glucose (also performed in this study) drives O-GlcNAcylation.

The authors have chosen to look at only one type of structure (N-glycan branching, as measured by PHA-L,) and never performed complete glycan composition from the cell surface, an overall measure of O-GlcNAc levels in cytoplasmic and nuclear proteins, or any detailed glycomic analysis.

Mgat5 is claimed to be responsible for the synthesis of glycan branch recognized by PHA-L by the authors. The deletion of Mgat5 in Figure 4B has only a modest change in the induction of Tregs, yet these cells should be completely PHA-L negative. Compare this to Figure 6A, B. The small change in PHA-L (Figure 6A) is not convincingly associated with the large reported change in T cell phenotype in Figure 6B, especially given the magnitudes shown in Figure 4B where PHA-L staining should be gone. This suggests that something not measurable with PHA-L is at play and that PHA-L is a poor measure of outcome.

mTOR is O-GlcNAcylated (PMID 20410138). Altering the balance of UDP-GlcNAc through various means in a cell, including the use of kifunensine, could easily alter the function of mTOR. The authors do not explore this possibility.

Several comments about changes in receptor function resulting from N-linked glycan branching should be addressed:

IL-2 is required for Treg survival, thus the conclusion reached by the authors that IL-2 "is required for branching to promote iTreg over TH17 differentiation (Figure 2E)" is not directly supported by the data. Without IL-2, Tregs die, with or without highly branched glycans.

The authors conclude that branching drives CD25 surface retention, but they only measure CD25 surface concentration. There is no direct data showing anything about surface retention. It is possible that the expression is merely lower. It is possible that the Mgat1 mutation creates problems with protein folding (a common effect). It is possible that it never even reaches the cell surface.

For readers not familiar with the Warburg effect and aerobic glycolysis, it would be helpful to mention that glycolysis is the conditional norm of anaerobic metabolism, and that the discovery by Warburg was that cancer cells constitutively use glycolysis even in aerobic conditions (e.g. aerobic glycolysis).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21330.015

Author response

General assessment:

This interesting report shows that pro-inflammatory cytokines induce a metabolic switch in T cells to aerobic glycolysis and glutaminolysis that starves the hexosamine pathway, reduces UDP-GlcNAc levels, and as a consequence reduces branching of N-linked glycans that coincides with the differentiation to pro-inflammatory TH17 cells and suppression of iTregs. While the data provide significant insights into the relationship between induction of aerobic catalysis and changes in glycosylation, the reviewers felt that the report implies a causal relationship between branching of N-linked glycans and differentiation of T cells to iTregs that is not fully supported by the data.

Major conclusions:

– TH17 cytokines induces a metabolic switch to aerobic glycolysis, differentiation of pro-inflammatory TH17 cells, and suppression of differentiation to iTreg cells.

– Aerobic glycolysis and reduced glutaminolysis consumes precursors of GlcNAc and UDP-GlcNAc, resulting in reduced branching of N-linked cytokines.

– Bypassing the suppression of N-linked glycan branching in the presence of TH17 cytokines by administering GlcNAc or, to a lesser extent, by increasing the expression of the branching enzyme, Mgat5, restores branching of N-linked glycans and reverses suppression of differentiation to iTregs.

– Causal relationships between N-linked glycan branching and function of surface receptors (e.g. IL2 receptor, CD25) suggest that N-linked glycan branching may play a direct role in driving TH17/ iTreg differentiation.

Required revisions:

The reviewers expressed major concerns about narrowly focusing interpretation of the results, with a bias that N-linked glycan branching controlled T cell differentiation. This was to the exclusion of the potential for branching to be coincidental to factors that induced differentiation or even other aspects of glycosylation that could be playing a principle role (e.g. O-GlcNAc glycosylation).

The reviewers raise the major issue that our data only supports the conclusion that alterations in branching induced by metabolic changes are coincidental rather than causal for T cell differentiation. We fully agree that by itself, our data demonstrating that GlcNAc raised UDP-GlcNAc/branching and affected T cell differentiation may be coincidental to other factors altered by metabolism, including other glycans (e.g. O-GlcNAc) that we did not assess. However, we feel our data goes well beyond this correlation to provide strong evidence of a causal relationship:

First, we show that directly altering branching enzyme activity in the Golgi with either a small molecule (kifunensine) or three different genetic approaches (inducible knockout of Mgat1, knockout of Mgat5 and inducible transgenic over-expression of Mgat5) all directly alter TH17 and iTreg differentiation (see Figure 1G, H; Figure 1—figure supplement 1E; Figure 1—figure supplement 2A, C; Figure 4A, B, C).

Second, we have previously published in eLife that inhibition of branching with small molecules (kifunensine, swainsonine) or genetically (Mgat2 deficiency) does not alter UDP-GlcNAc levels in T cells (Mkhikian et al. (2016) eLife 5 e14814). Therefore, altering branching should have no secondary effects on other UDP-GlcNAc dependent pathways, such as O-GlcNAc.

Third, we show that the effects of GlcNAc on T cell differentiation are reversed by directly blocking Golgi branching activity with kifunensine (Figure 1—figure supplement 1E, Figure 4C). If other pathways were essential (e.g. O-GlcNAc), then blocking branching would not have reversed the effects of GlcNAc.

Fourth, we show that GlcNAc and kifunensine do not significantly alter the metabolic state of the T cell (as measured by the Oxygen Consumption Rate versus the Extracellular Acidification Rate – see Figure 3A, B), yet result in profound changes in T cell differentiation. Thus, manipulating branching does not acutely induce significant metabolic changes in the T cell, consistent with our published data that reducing branching does not alter UDP-GlcNAc levels in T cells (Mkhikian et al. (2016) eLife 5 e14814). Note that we do show that altering branching with GlcNAc and kifunensine induces a mild change in glucose uptake (Figure 3—figure supplement 1A), but this is insufficient to significantly alter aerobic glycolysis/oxidative phosphorylation or UDP-GlcNAc levels in T cells.

Fifth, we demonstrate that TH17 versus iTreg differentiation can be de-coupled from the metabolic state of the cell by manipulating branching. Specifically, we show that inhibiting aerobic glycolysis with rapamycin or galactose as well as oxidative phosphorylation with Etoxomir not only alters branching as predicted (Figure 3D, E, 4D, 5A), but that reversing the changes in branching (using GlcNAc, kifunensine and/or inducible Mgat1 KO) blocks the effects of the metabolic inhibitors on T cell differentiation/proliferation (Figure 3F, G; Figure 3—figure supplement 1C, D; Figure 4F, Figure 5B, C). Most importantly, blocking branching with kifunensine did not reverse the inhibition of aerobic glycolysis induced by rapamycin or galactose (Figure 3B, C), yet reversed their effects on TH17 versus iTreg differentiation (Figure 3F, G; Figure 3—figure supplement 1C, D). This demonstrates that the change in branching induced by altering metabolism is not simply co-incidental but required for altering TH17 versus iTreg differentiation.

Thus, while we fully agree with the reviewers that metabolic changes in the cell and GlcNAc likely alter other pathways, our data provide strong evidence that metabolically driven changes in branching are causal in controlling TH17 versus iTreg differentiation. However, we agree that this does not exclude a role for other pathways. Indeed, we observed that the effects of glutaminolysis on branching only partially explain the effects on T cell differentiation. This was based on our observation that 1) while the α-ketoglutarate analog DMK did not reverse the effects of glutaminase inhibition by DON on branching or TH17 differentiation (Figure 6E, G), it did partially rescue effects on iTreg differentiation (Figure 6I) and 2) blocking branching with kifunensine only partially reversed the effects of glutaminase inhibition by DON and Azaserine on TH17 versus iTreg generation (Figure 6G-J). These data are discussed in the last few sentences of the Results section, where we state “Together, these data indicate that glutamine availability regulates branching to affect TH17 versus iTreg differentiation, but other factors such as catabolism of glutamine to α-ketoglutarate likely also play a role.” We have also added a paragraph to the Discussion to further emphasize these points.

A related concern was the lack of data confirming that changes in N-linked branching was taking place. Changes were only measured with the lectin PHA-L. There was no effort to assess how quantitative the changes in branching were. Addressing these concerns should be a priority in a revised manuscript.

Thank you for this suggestion. To confirm reduction in N-glycan branching, we have added new flow cytometry data with additional lectins demonstrating that TH17 cytokines 1) reduced LacNAc content (i.e. reduced Galectin-3 binding), 2) reduced bisecting branched N-glycans (i.e. reduced E-PHA binding) and 3) increased high-mannose N-glycans (i.e. increased ConA binding) (Figure 1—figure supplement 1B). All of these changes will lead to reduced galectin binding to N-glycans, thereby weakening the galectin-glycoprotein lattice and drive downstream phenotypes.

In terms of quantitation, measuring ‘mean fluorescence intensity’ by flow cytometry is the primary method to quantitatively assess levels of molecules at the cell surface. Others and we have previously validated flow cytometry with L-PHA as a highly sensitive, specific and quantitative measure of branching at the cell surface (via comparison to MALDI-TOF mass spectroscopy and HPEAC – see Lau et al. (2007) Cell, Grigorian et al. (2007, 2011) JBC and Mkhikian et al. (2016) eLife). As the enzymes in the N-glycan branching pathway act linearly and with declining efficiency, production of β1,6 GlcNAc branched tri- and tetra-antennary N-glycans (the ligand for L-PHA) not only depends on Mgat5 activity but also on the activity of upstream enzymes (e.g. Mgat1, Mgat2, mannosidase I, mannosidase II). For example, titrations of inhibitors for mannosidase I (kifunensine) or mannosidase II (swainsonine) show a direct relationship to changes in L-PHA binding as measured by flow cytometry. Thus, L-PHA flow cytometry is a quantitative measure of the overall output of the branching pathway, rather than simply a measure of Mgat5 activity.

Point by point responses to other issues are presented below.

There are several places in the manuscript that suggest the metabolic switch to aerobic glycolysis targets the hexosamine/N-glycosylation pathway to control T cell differentiation. Rather what has been shown is that the downstream effects are a consequence of the switch to aerobic glycolysis. The implication that this metabolic switch occurs to control these events goes beyond what is shown. It is a subtle difference but an important one.

Abstract, bottom line: “and N-glycan branching to control cell function” should be “N-glycan branching that controls cell function”.

The suggested change has been made (last sentence of Introduction).

Discussion, first paragraph: “aerobic glycolysis and glutaminolysis act in concert to control cell growth and differentiation”.

The sentence has been deleted.

Discussion, second paragraph, last sentence: “We conclude that metabolic switches… target hexosamine/N-glycosylation… to control T cell differentiation and growth”.

This has been changed to “We conclude that metabolic switches between oxidative phosphorylation and aerobic glycolysis plus glutaminolysis primarily target hexosamine/N-glycosylation via altered glucose and glutamine flux, and as a consequence influence T cell differentiation and growth.”

The authors ignore a recent article (PMID 26972830) reporting that providing GlcNAc to mice "increased N-glycan branching" and showed altered glucose homeostasis (increased uptake), hepatic glycogen, lipid metabolism, and response to fasting. In cultured cells they reported "enhanced uptake of glucose, glutamine, and fatty acids" and "enhanced lipid synthesis". These results show that GlcNAc supplementation does not only impact N-glycan branching. It would change N- and O-linked glycan structures (not measured here). GlcNAc can be also epimerized to ManNAc and fuel the sialic acid biosynthetic pathway (not measured here). GlcNAc supplementation and the concomitant increase in glucose uptake would significantly impact O-GlcNAc levels, which alters many cell biological processes, including those of T cell differentiation (not explored here). In other parts of the article they supplement with galactose, but this is known to increase sialylation (PMID 25931375), and supplementation with glucose (also performed in this study) drives O-GlcNAcylation.

PMID 26972830 and our work differ in that PMID 26972830 is assessing the downstream effects of GlcNAc/branching on metabolism while we do the opposite, examining the downstream effects of metabolism on branching. Specifically, PMID 26972830 argues that GlcNAc is promoting branching, which in turn affects metabolite uptake in the liver and adipose tissue via branching enhancing surface retention of metabolite transporters. In contrast, we are assessing the effects of aerobic glycolysis/oxidative phosphorylation on branching and associated downstream phenotypes in T cells. We use GlcNAc salvage into the hexosamine pathway as a mechanism to by-pass metabolic effects of aerobic glycolysis on the de novo hexosamine pathway. Importantly, and in contrast to PMID 26972830, we show that neither GlcNAc or kifunensine acutely altered the metabolic state of the T cell (as measured by the oxygen consumption rate and extracellular acidification rate – Figure 3A, B). This was despite altering glucose uptake (Figure 3—figure supplement 1A), as observed in PMID 26972830. Moreover, we have previously shown that lowering branching does not alter UDP-GlcNAc levels in T cells (Mkhikian et al. (2016) eLife 5 e14814) and therefore our experiments inhibiting Golgi branching activity should have no effect on O-GlcNAc or CMP-Sialic Acid production. Thus, our observation that T cell differentiation is changed by directly altering branching activity in the Golgi (e.g. kifunensine, Mgat1 KO, Mgat5 KO and inducible Mgat5 over-expression) demonstrates causality of branching on TH17 versus iTreg differentiation.

GlcNAc does raise UDP-GlcNAc levels, which in theory may impact O-GlcNAc or CMP-Sialic Acid in addition to branching. However, we show that the effects of GlcNAc on T cell differentiation are reversed by directly blocking Golgi branching activity (Figure 1—figure supplement 1E, Figure 4C), confirming that the effects of raised UDP-GlcNAc were predominantly through branching rather than other pathways. Most importantly, we show that blocking the effects of the metabolic modulators rapamycin, galactose or etoximer on branching reversed their effects on T cell differentiation (Figure 3F, G; Figure 3—figure supplement 1C, D; Figure 4F, Figure 5B, C) despite not reversing effects on metabolism (Figure 3B, C). In this manner, we fully decoupled T cell differentiation from the metabolic state of the cell by manipulating branching. Combined, this data demonstrates that metabolism induced changes in N-glycan branching are causal in regulating T cell differentiation. However, we acknowledge that this does not exclude metabolically driven changes in other pathways and indeed we state that the effects of glutaminolysis on branching only partially explain the phenotype (see last few sentences of Results section). A summary of the above arguments has been added to the Discussion.

The authors have chosen to look at only one type of structure (N-glycan branching, as measured by PHA-L,) and never performed complete glycan composition from the cell surface, an overall measure of O-GlcNAc levels in cytoplasmic and nuclear proteins, or any detailed glycomic analysis.

As noted above, we confirmed TH17 cytokine induced changes in N-glycan branching using flow cytometry with 3 additional lectins. Also, note that we have previously utilized mass spec and HPEAC to validate changes in N-glycans observed with lectins.

Our first fundamental observation was that TH17 cytokines markedly reduced branching in T cells. We then demonstrated that directly altering Golgi branching enzyme activity markedly affected TH17 versus iTeg differentiation. Thus, the next logical step was to evaluate what the mechanism for altered branching during T cell differentiation. As TH17 cells are highly glycolytic while iTreg cells utilize lipid oxidation, we pursued the hypothesis that the changes in branching were metabolically driven. Our goal was not to broadly assess downstream effects of metabolism. As we go on to demonstrate a causal link between aerobic glycolysis/oxidative phosphorylation, branching and T cell differentiation (see discussion above), assessing other pathways is beyond the scope of this investigation.

Mgat5 is claimed to be responsible for the synthesis of glycan branch recognized by PHA-L by the authors. The deletion of Mgat5 in Figure 4B has only a modest change in the induction of Tregs, yet these cells should be completely PHA-L negative. Compare this to Figure 6A, B. The small change in PHA-L (Figure 6A) is not convincingly associated with the large reported change in T cell phenotype in Figure 6B, especially given the magnitudes shown in Figure 4B where PHA-L staining should be gone. This suggests that something not measurable with PHA-L is at play and that PHA-L is a poor measure of outcome.

As the enzymes in the N-glycan branching pathway act linearly and with declining efficiency, production of β1,6 GlcNAc branched tri- and tetra-antennary N-glycans that L-PHA binds not only depends on Mgat5 activity but also on the activity of upstream enzymes (e.g. Mgat1, Mgat2, mannosidase I, mannosidase II). In this manner, L-PHA flow cytometry of wildtype cells is a quantitative measure of the overall output of the branching pathway, rather than simply a measure of Mgat5 activity. Thus, the small increase in L-PHA binding in 6A reflects not only increased β1,6 GlcNAc branching by Mgat5, but also increased branching by Mgat1 and Mgat2. Importantly, the relationship between L-PHA binding and overall branching is not true when examining genetically targeted cells deleted for branching enzymes. For example, L-PHA does not bind Mgat5-/- or Mgat1-/- T cells, yet the former only reduces galectin-3 binding ~50% while the latter eliminates all LacNAc ligands for galectins (Mkhikian et al. (2016) eLife 5 e14814 and Zhou et al. (2014) Nature Immunology). Thus, Mgat1 deletion is a much more severe disruption of the galectin – glycoprotein lattice than Mgat5 deletion even though both lack L-PHA binding. This explains why phenotypic changes are more severe in the Mgat1 versus Mgat5 KO cells (e.g. compare Figure 4A to 4B).

Also, note that we state that the effects of glutaminolysis on branching only partially explain the phenotypic effects of glutaminolysis (see last few sentences of Results section).

mTOR is O-GlcNAcylated (PMID 20410138). Altering the balance of UDP-GlcNAc through various means in a cell, including the use of kifunensine, could easily alter the function of mTOR. The authors do not explore this possibility.

As noted above, total cellular UDP-GlcNAc levels are not altered by kifunensine or deletion of branching enzymes in T cells (Mkhikian et al. (2016) eLife 5 e14814). Moreover, mTOR drives glycolysis (via HIF1) yet neither kifunensine or GlcNAc significantly altered the glycolytic state of the T cell (Figure 3A, B). Thus, there is little reason to expect that the manipulations of branching will affect O-GlcNAcylation of mTOR. In contrast, we do show that mTOR has profound effects on branching, as rapamycin markedly enhanced L-PHA binding in T cells (Figure 3D).

Several comments about changes in receptor function resulting from N-linked glycan branching should be addressed:

IL-2 is required for Treg survival, thus the conclusion reached by the authors that IL-2 "is required for branching to promote iTreg over TH17 differentiation (Figure 2E)" is not directly supported by the data. Without IL-2, Tregs die, with or without highly branched glycans.

Thank you for this point. Figure 2E only showed a ratio of TH17 to iTreg, where the results could have been explained by only a change in Treg death from blockade of IL-2. We have now separated the data to demonstrate that anti-IL-2 antibody enhanced production of TH17 cells while also reducing the number of iTreg’s despite treatment with GlcNAc (Figure 2—figure supplement 1F). Moreover, we showed that addition of exogenous IL-2 enhanced iTreg and inhibited TH17 in the presence but not absence of branching (Figure 2F, Figure 2—figure supplement 1G, H), consistent with branching regulating a change in cell fate rather than simply death of iTreg via IL-2 signaling.

The authors conclude that branching drives CD25 surface retention, but they only measure CD25 surface concentration. There is no direct data showing anything about surface retention. It is possible that the expression is merely lower. It is possible that the Mgat1 mutation creates problems with protein folding (a common effect). It is possible that it never even reaches the cell surface.

Using an “acid wash” endocytosis assay that we have used previously, we have added new data indicating that CD25 surface retention is reduced by loss of branching (Figure 2—figure supplement 1B).

For readers not familiar with the Warburg effect and aerobic glycolysis, it would be helpful to mention that glycolysis is the conditional norm of anaerobic metabolism, and that the discovery by Warburg was that cancer cells constitutively use glycolysis even in aerobic conditions (e.g. aerobic glycolysis).

We have added this point to the Introduction.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21330.016

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Lindsey Araujo

    1. Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Irvine, United States
    Contribution
    LA, Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing—original draft
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Phillip Khim

    1. Department of Neurology and Institute for Immunology, University of California, Irvine, United States
    Contribution
    PK, Data curation, Investigation
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Haik Mkhikian

    1. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Irvine, United States
    Contribution
    HM, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing—review and editing
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Christie-Lynn Mortales

    1. Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Irvine, United States
    Contribution
    C-LM, Data curation, Investigation
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Michael Demetriou

    1. Department of Neurology and Institute for Immunology, University of California, Irvine, United States
    Contribution
    MD, Conceptualization, Resources, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Writing—original draft, Project administration, Writing—review and editing
    For correspondence
    1. mdemetri@uci.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon 0000-0001-8547-5774

Funding

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01 AI053331)

  • Michael Demetriou

National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (R01 AT007452)

  • Michael Demetriou

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01 AI108917)

  • Michael Demetriou

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Acknowledgements

Research was supported by R01AI053331 and R01AI108917 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease and R01 AT007452 from the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health to MD. We thank Yumay Chen of the Ping Wang lab for helping with experiments and Barbara Newton for proofreading the manuscript.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#2001-2305) of the University of California, Irvine.

Reviewing Editor

  1. James Paulson, Reviewing Editor, The Scripps Research Institute, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: September 7, 2016
  2. Accepted: January 5, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: January 6, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: January 23, 2017 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2017, Araujo et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,401
    Page views
  • 562
    Downloads
  • 4
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Comments

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology and Stem Cells
    Cyrille Ramond et al.
    Research Article