La-related protein 1 (LARP1) binds the mRNA cap, blocking eIF4F assembly on TOP mRNAs

  1. Roni M Lahr
  2. Bruno D Fonseca
  3. Gabrielle E Ciotti
  4. Hiba A Al-Ashtal
  5. Jian-Jun Jia
  6. Marius R Niklaus
  7. Sarah P Blagden
  8. Tommy Allain
  9. Andrea J Berman  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Pittsburgh, United States
  2. Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Canada
  3. University of Oxford, United Kingdom

Abstract

The 5’terminal oligopyrimidine (5’TOP) motif is a cis-regulatory RNA element located immediately downstream of the 7-methyl-guanosine [m7G] cap of TOP mRNAs, which encode ribosomal proteins and translation factors. In eukaryotes, this motif coordinates the synchronous and stoichiometric expression of the protein components of the translation machinery. La-related protein 1 (LARP1) binds TOP mRNAs, regulating their stability and translation. We present crystal structures of the human LARP1 DM15 region in complex with a 5’TOP motif, a cap analog (m7GTP), and a capped cytosine (m7GpppC) resolved to 2.6, 1.8 and 1.7 Å, respectively. Our binding, competition, and immunoprecipitation data corroborate and elaborate on the mechanism of 5’TOP motif binding by LARP1. We show that LARP1 directly binds the cap and adjacent 5’TOP motif of TOP mRNAs, effectively impeding access of eIF4E to the cap and preventing eIF4F assembly. Thus, LARP1 is a specialized TOP mRNA cap-binding protein that controls ribosome biogenesis.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated
    1. Lahr and Berman
    (2017) DM15-RNA cocrystal
    Publicly available at the RCSB Protein Data Bank (accession no: 5V7C).
    1. Lahr and Berman
    (2017) DM15-m7GTP cocrystal
    Publicly available at the RCSB Protein Data Bank (accession no: 5V4R).
    1. Lahr and Berman
    (2017) DM15-m7GpppC cocrystal
    Publicly available at the RCSB Protein Data Bank (accession no: 5V87).

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Roni M Lahr

    Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Bruno D Fonseca

    Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Gabrielle E Ciotti

    Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Hiba A Al-Ashtal

    Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Jian-Jun Jia

    Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Marius R Niklaus

    Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Sarah P Blagden

    Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Tommy Allain

    Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Andrea J Berman

    Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States
    For correspondence
    ajb190@pitt.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1217-7412

Funding

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM116889)

  • Andrea J Berman

Prostate Cancer Canada (PCC Discovery Grant D2015-02)

  • Bruno D Fonseca
  • Tommy Allain

University of Pittsburgh

  • Roni M Lahr
  • Gabrielle E Ciotti
  • Hiba A Al-Ashtal
  • Andrea J Berman

Samuel and Emma Winters Foundation

  • Andrea J Berman

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Cynthia Wolberger, Johns Hopkins University, United States

Version history

  1. Received: December 11, 2016
  2. Accepted: April 4, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: April 5, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: April 7, 2017 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record published: May 5, 2017 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2017, Lahr et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 7,541
    views
  • 1,292
    downloads
  • 131
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Roni M Lahr
  2. Bruno D Fonseca
  3. Gabrielle E Ciotti
  4. Hiba A Al-Ashtal
  5. Jian-Jun Jia
  6. Marius R Niklaus
  7. Sarah P Blagden
  8. Tommy Allain
  9. Andrea J Berman
(2017)
La-related protein 1 (LARP1) binds the mRNA cap, blocking eIF4F assembly on TOP mRNAs
eLife 6:e24146.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.24146

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.24146

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Natalia E Ketaren, Fred D Mast ... John D Aitchison
    Research Advance

    To date, all major modes of monoclonal antibody therapy targeting SARS-CoV-2 have lost significant efficacy against the latest circulating variants. As SARS-CoV-2 omicron sublineages account for over 90% of COVID-19 infections, evasion of immune responses generated by vaccination or exposure to previous variants poses a significant challenge. A compelling new therapeutic strategy against SARS-CoV-2 is that of single-domain antibodies, termed nanobodies, which address certain limitations of monoclonal antibodies. Here, we demonstrate that our high-affinity nanobody repertoire, generated against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (Mast et al., 2021), remains effective against variants of concern, including omicron BA.4/BA.5; a subset is predicted to counter resistance in emerging XBB and BQ.1.1 sublineages. Furthermore, we reveal the synergistic potential of nanobody cocktails in neutralizing emerging variants. Our study highlights the power of nanobody technology as a versatile therapeutic and diagnostic tool to combat rapidly evolving infectious diseases such as SARS-CoV-2.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Benjamin R Duewell, Naomi E Wilson ... Scott D Hansen
    Research Article

    Phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) beta (PI3Kβ) is functionally unique in the ability to integrate signals derived from receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), G-protein coupled receptors, and Rho-family GTPases. The mechanism by which PI3Kβ prioritizes interactions with various membrane-tethered signaling inputs, however, remains unclear. Previous experiments did not determine whether interactions with membrane-tethered proteins primarily control PI3Kβ localization versus directly modulate lipid kinase activity. To address this gap in our knowledge, we established an assay to directly visualize how three distinct protein interactions regulate PI3Kβ when presented to the kinase in a biologically relevant configuration on supported lipid bilayers. Using single molecule Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence (TIRF) Microscopy, we determined the mechanism controlling PI3Kβ membrane localization, prioritization of signaling inputs, and lipid kinase activation. We find that auto-inhibited PI3Kβ prioritizes interactions with RTK-derived tyrosine phosphorylated (pY) peptides before engaging either GβGγ or Rac1(GTP). Although pY peptides strongly localize PI3Kβ to membranes, stimulation of lipid kinase activity is modest. In the presence of either pY/GβGγ or pY/Rac1(GTP), PI3Kβ activity is dramatically enhanced beyond what can be explained by simply increasing membrane localization. Instead, PI3Kβ is synergistically activated by pY/GβGγ and pY/Rac1 (GTP) through a mechanism consistent with allosteric regulation.