1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
  2. Plant Biology
Download icon

A quantitative hypermorphic CNGC allele confers ectopic calcium flux and impairs cellular development

  1. David M Chiasson
  2. Kristina Haage
  3. Katharina Sollweck
  4. Andreas Brachmann
  5. Petra Dietrich
  6. Martin Parniske  Is a corresponding author
  1. Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Germany
  2. Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany
Short Report
  • Cited 16
  • Views 2,611
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2017;6:e25012 doi: 10.7554/eLife.25012

Abstract

The coordinated control of Ca2+ signaling is essential for development in eukaryotes. Cyclic nucleotide-gated channel (CNGC) family members mediate Ca2+ influx from cellular stores in plants1-4. Here we report the unusual genetic behavior of a quantitative gain-of-function CNGC mutation (brush) in Lotus japonicus resulting in a leaky tetrameric channel. brush resides in a cluster of redundant CNGCs encoding subunits which resemble metazoan voltage-gated potassium (Kv1-Kv4) channels in assembly and gating properties. Plants homozygous for brush are impaired in root development and infection by nitrogen-fixing rhizobia which segregated as a recessive monogenic trait. The brush allele exhibited quantitative behavior since overexpression of the cluster subunits was required to suppress the brush phenotype. The results reveal a mechanism by which quantitative competition between channel subunits for tetramer assembly can impact the phenotype of the mutation carrier.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. David M Chiasson

    Faculty of Biology, Genetics, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0770-2684
  2. Kristina Haage

    Faculty of Biology, Genetics, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Katharina Sollweck

    Faculty of Biology, Genetics, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Andreas Brachmann

    Faculty of Biology, Genetics, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Petra Dietrich

    Division of Molecular Plant Physiology, Department of Biology, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Martin Parniske

    Faculty of Biology, Genetics, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Martinsried, Germany
    For correspondence
    parniske@lmu.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8561-747X

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (FOR964 (Calcium))

  • Kristina Haage
  • Petra Dietrich
  • Martin Parniske

H2020 European Research Council (340904 (EvolvingNodules))

  • Martin Parniske

Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung

  • David M Chiasson

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Maria J Harrison, Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: January 10, 2017
  2. Accepted: September 20, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: September 21, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: December 5, 2017 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2017, Chiasson et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,611
    Page views
  • 568
    Downloads
  • 16
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Natalia Petrenko, Kevin Struhl
    Research Article Updated

    The preinitiation complex (PIC) for transcriptional initiation by RNA polymerase (Pol) II is composed of general transcription factors that are highly conserved. However, analysis of ChIP-seq datasets reveals kinetic and compositional differences in the transcriptional initiation process among eukaryotic species. In yeast, Mediator associates strongly with activator proteins bound to enhancers, but it transiently associates with promoters in a form that lacks the kinase module. In contrast, in human, mouse, and fly cells, Mediator with its kinase module stably associates with promoters, but not with activator-binding sites. This suggests that yeast and metazoans differ in the nature of the dynamic bridge of Mediator between activators and Pol II and the composition of a stable inactive PIC-like entity. As in yeast, occupancies of TATA-binding protein (TBP) and TBP-associated factors (Tafs) at mammalian promoters are not strictly correlated. This suggests that within PICs, TFIID is not a monolithic entity, and multiple forms of TBP affect initiation at different classes of genes. TFIID in flies, but not yeast and mammals, interacts strongly at regions downstream of the initiation site, consistent with the importance of downstream promoter elements in that species. Lastly, Taf7 and the mammalian-specific Med26 subunit of Mediator also interact near the Pol II pause region downstream of the PIC, but only in subsets of genes and often not together. Species-specific differences in PIC structure and function are likely to affect how activators and repressors affect transcriptional activity.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Luka Bacic et al.
    Research Article Updated

    The chromatin remodeler ALC1 is recruited to and activated by DNA damage-induced poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) chains deposited by PARP1/PARP2/HPF1 upon detection of DNA lesions. ALC1 has emerged as a candidate drug target for cancer therapy as its loss confers synthetic lethality in homologous recombination-deficient cells. However, structure-based drug design and molecular analysis of ALC1 have been hindered by the requirement for PARylation and the highly heterogeneous nature of this post-translational modification. Here, we reconstituted an ALC1 and PARylated nucleosome complex modified in vitro using PARP2 and HPF1. This complex was amenable to cryo-EM structure determination without cross-linking, which enabled visualization of several intermediate states of ALC1 from the recognition of the PARylated nucleosome to the tight binding and activation of the remodeler. Functional biochemical assays with PARylated nucleosomes highlight the importance of nucleosomal epitopes for productive remodeling and suggest that ALC1 preferentially slides nucleosomes away from DNA breaks.