Kinetochore inactivation by expression of a repressive mRNA

  1. Jingxun Chen
  2. Amy Tresenrider
  3. Minghao Chia
  4. David T McSwiggen
  5. Gianpiero Spedale
  6. Victoria Jorgensen
  7. Hanna Liao
  8. Folkert Jacobus van Werven  Is a corresponding author
  9. Elcin Unal  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of California, Berkeley, United States
  2. The Francis Crick Institute, United Kingdom
  3. Li Ka Shing Center, University of California, United States
  4. University of California, United States

Abstract

Differentiation programs such as meiosis depend on extensive gene regulation to mediate cellular morphogenesis. Meiosis requires transient removal of the outer kinetochore, the complex that connects microtubules to chromosomes. How the meiotic gene expression program temporally restricts kinetochore function is unknown. We discovered that in budding yeast, kinetochore inactivation occurs by reducing the abundance of a limiting subunit, Ndc80. Furthermore, we uncovered an integrated mechanism that acts at the transcriptional and translational level to repress NDC80 expression. Central to this mechanism is the developmentally controlled transcription of an alternate NDC80 mRNA isoform, which itself cannot produce protein due to regulatory upstream ORFs in its extended 5' leader. Instead, transcription of this isoform represses the canonical NDC80 mRNA expression in cis, thereby inhibiting Ndc80 protein synthesis. This model of gene regulation raises the intriguing notion that transcription of an mRNA, despite carrying a canonical coding sequence, can directly cause gene repression.

Data availability

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jingxun Chen

    Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Amy Tresenrider

    Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Minghao Chia

    The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. David T McSwiggen

    Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Li Ka Shing Center, University of California, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Gianpiero Spedale

    The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Victoria Jorgensen

    Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Hanna Liao

    Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Folkert Jacobus van Werven

    The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    folkert.vanwerven@crick.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6685-2084
  9. Elcin Unal

    Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, United States
    For correspondence
    elcin@berkeley.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6768-609X

Funding

March of Dimes Foundation (5-FY15-99)

  • Elcin Unal

Pew Charitable Trusts (27344)

  • Elcin Unal

Glenn Foundation for Medical Research

  • Elcin Unal

Francis Crick Institute

  • Folkert Jacobus van Werven

National Science Foundation

  • Jingxun Chen

Agency for Science, Technology and Research

  • Minghao Chia

Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation (35-15)

  • Elcin Unal

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2017, Chen et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,800
    views
  • 591
    downloads
  • 77
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jingxun Chen
  2. Amy Tresenrider
  3. Minghao Chia
  4. David T McSwiggen
  5. Gianpiero Spedale
  6. Victoria Jorgensen
  7. Hanna Liao
  8. Folkert Jacobus van Werven
  9. Elcin Unal
(2017)
Kinetochore inactivation by expression of a repressive mRNA
eLife 6:e27417.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27417

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27417

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    A Elizabeth Hildreth, Karen M Arndt
    Insight

    A key protein involved in the segregation of meiotic chromosomes is produced 'just in time' by the regulated expression of two mRNA isoforms.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Gülnihal Kavaklioglu, Alexandra Podhornik ... Christian Seiser
    Research Article

    Repression of retrotransposition is crucial for the successful fitness of a mammalian organism. The domesticated transposon protein L1TD1, derived from LINE-1 (L1) ORF1p, is an RNA-binding protein that is expressed only in some cancers and early embryogenesis. In human embryonic stem cells, it is found to be essential for maintaining pluripotency. In cancer, L1TD1 expression is highly correlative with malignancy progression and as such considered a potential prognostic factor for tumors. However, its molecular role in cancer remains largely unknown. Our findings reveal that DNA hypomethylation induces the expression of L1TD1 in HAP1 human tumor cells. L1TD1 depletion significantly modulates both the proteome and transcriptome and thereby reduces cell viability. Notably, L1TD1 associates with L1 transcripts and interacts with L1 ORF1p protein, thereby facilitating L1 retrotransposition. Our data suggest that L1TD1 collaborates with its ancestral L1 ORF1p as an RNA chaperone, ensuring the efficient retrotransposition of L1 retrotransposons, rather than directly impacting the abundance of L1TD1 targets. In this way, L1TD1 might have an important role not only during early development but also in tumorigenesis.