Thermoregulation: How a brain keeps its cool

Temperature-sensing neurons in the Drosophila brain cooperate with the central circadian clock to help regulate body temperature.
  1. Swathi Yadlapalli
  2. Orie T Shafer  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Michigan, United States

Keeping body temperature within a certain range is essential for nearly all animals. Endothermic animals can generate their own heat and maintain a fixed body temperature, even when the temperature of their environment changes. Nevertheless, their core body temperature fluctuates modestly but predictably throughout the day, due to programmed changes in heat production and loss (Kräuchi and Wirz-Justice, 1994). In humans, for example, the core body temperature is lowest late at night (Aschoff, 1983). These daily changes are driven by a central circadian clock in the brain and they serve as important signals, both to synchronize other circadian clocks throughout the body (Buhr et al., 2010) and to ensure that we sleep at night (Kräuchi and Wirz-Justice, 2001).

Ectothermic animals, on the other hand, cannot produce their own heat, so their body temperature is determined by their environment. However, they have evolved different strategies to regulate their temperature. Iguanas, for example, vary their daily temperature by changing their level of activity throughout the day and also by moving around to take advantage of the different ambient temperatures within their environment (Tosini and Menaker, 1995). Thus, daily variations and rhythms in body temperature can be found in both endothermic and ectothermic animals, suggesting that they are a fundamental adaptation to life on a revolving planet.

Now, in eLife, Fumika Hamada and colleagues – including Xin Tang of Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center as first author – report new insights into the regulation of body temperature in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster (Tang et al., 2017). Previous work from the Hamada lab established that D. melanogaster, which is ectothermic, has a daily temperature preference rhythm. By switching its preference from higher temperatures during the day to lower temperatures at night, it produces daily body temperature rhythms similar to those seen in endothermic animals (Kaneko et al., 2012).

Drosophila has a relatively simple network of approximately 150 circadian clock neurons that are organized into distinct groups (Nitabach and Taghert, 2008). Each neuron has its own circadian clock, and together they form a network that serves as the master circadian pacemaker in the fly. The Hamada lab has previously shown that a small class of clock neurons, the dorsal neuron 2 group (or DN2s for short), regulate the temperature preference rhythm in the fly (Kaneko et al., 2012). Based on these findings, Tang et al. sought to identify the underlying neural pathways.

First, they revealed that a group of neurons called small ventral lateral clock neurons, which drive the fly’s pre-dawn bout of activity (Renn et al., 1999; Stoleru et al., 2004; Grima et al., 2004), are also required for setting the temperature preference in the hours preceding dawn. When these ventral lateral neurons were disrupted, the flies preferred abnormally low temperatures just before dawn. By contrast, when DN2s were disrupted, the flies preferred lower temperatures throughout their entire 24 hour-circadian cycle.

Tang et al. then examined whether these two groups of neurons are connected and, if so, how connections change during the course of the circadian cycle. They discovered that the projections of the ventral lateral neurons terminate next to those of the DN2s and that ventral lateral neurons excite the DN2s. The number of the neural connections between the two groups of neurons increased significantly throughout the night, peaking just before dawn and falling throughout the day. This suggests that the previously discovered morphological modifications of the ventral lateral neurons, such as the expansion and contraction of their axon terminals (Fernández et al., 2008), may cause the changes in thermal preference over the course of the day.

The researchers – who are based in Cincinnati, London and Japan – next addressed how external temperature and time of day are integrated in the brain to produce a temperature preference rhythm. This was guided by previous work, which had established that a group of neurons in the central brain called anterior cell neurons act as internal heat sensors (Hamada et al., 2008). Now, Tang et al. provide compelling evidence that these anterior cells modulate the ventral lateral neurons to regulate temperature preference before dawn; when the anterior cells were blocked, the fly’s preferred temperature was lowered. Thus, they have revealed a simple neural circuitry that drives the fly’s temperature preference rhythm. Within this network, the temperature-sensing anterior cells modulate ventral lateral neurons, which in turn activate the DN2s to lower the preferred temperature before dawn.

The fly can use daily changes in the surrounding temperature as a cue to adjust its near 24-hour endogenous period and sleep-activity cycle to match the precise 24-hour light-dark cycle (Wheeler et al., 1993). Remarkably, the temperature-sensitive pathway implicated by Tang et al. does not appear to help adjust the central clock to daily temperature cycles. Thus, Drosophila seems to rely on distinct temperature-sensing pathways to produce and adjust to daily temperature rhythms.

By identifying the neural pathways underlying the daily regulation of temperature preference, Tang, Hamada and colleagues have revealed how the fly’s brain can generate a predictable daily body temperature rhythm – a remarkable feat for a such a small ‘thermoconformer’ that constantly has to face unpredictable temperature changes.

References

    1. Kräuchi K
    2. Wirz-Justice A
    (1994)
    Circadian rhythm of heat production, heart rate, and skin and core temperature under unmasking conditions in men
    American Journal of Physiology 267:819–829.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Swathi Yadlapalli

    Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Orie T Shafer

    Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    For correspondence
    oshafer@umich.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7177-743X

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published: May 30, 2017 (version 1)
  2. Version of Record updated: June 8, 2017 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2017, Yadlapalli et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,152
    Page views
  • 222
    Downloads
  • 0
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Swathi Yadlapalli
  2. Orie T Shafer
(2017)
Thermoregulation: How a brain keeps its cool
eLife 6:e28109.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.28109

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Ashtyn T Wiltbank et al.
    Research Article

    Efficient neurotransmission is essential for organism survival and is enhanced by myelination. However, the genes that regulate myelin and myelinating glial cell development have not been fully characterized. Data from our lab and others demonstrates that cd59, which encodes for a small GPI-anchored glycoprotein, is highly expressed in developing zebrafish, rodent, and human oligodendrocytes (OLs) and Schwann cells (SCs), and that patients with CD59 dysfunction develop neurological dysfunction during early childhood. Yet, the function of Cd59 in the developing nervous system is currently undefined. In this study, we demonstrate that cd59 is expressed in a subset of developing SCs. Using cd59 mutant zebrafish, we show that developing SCs proliferate excessively and nerves may have reduced myelin volume, altered myelin ultrastructure, and perturbed node of Ranvier assembly. Finally, we demonstrate that complement activity is elevated in cd59 mutants and that inhibiting inflammation restores SC proliferation, myelin volume, and nodes of Ranvier to wildtype levels. Together, this work identifies Cd59 and developmental inflammation as key players in myelinating glial cell development, highlighting the collaboration between glia and the innate immune system to ensure normal neural development.

    1. Neuroscience
    Arefeh Sherafati et al.
    Research Article Updated

    Cochlear implants are neuroprosthetic devices that can restore hearing in people with severe to profound hearing loss by electrically stimulating the auditory nerve. Because of physical limitations on the precision of this stimulation, the acoustic information delivered by a cochlear implant does not convey the same level of acoustic detail as that conveyed by normal hearing. As a result, speech understanding in listeners with cochlear implants is typically poorer and more effortful than in listeners with normal hearing. The brain networks supporting speech understanding in listeners with cochlear implants are not well understood, partly due to difficulties obtaining functional neuroimaging data in this population. In the current study, we assessed the brain regions supporting spoken word understanding in adult listeners with right unilateral cochlear implants (n=20) and matched controls (n=18) using high-density diffuse optical tomography (HD-DOT), a quiet and non-invasive imaging modality with spatial resolution comparable to that of functional MRI. We found that while listening to spoken words in quiet, listeners with cochlear implants showed greater activity in the left prefrontal cortex than listeners with normal hearing, specifically in a region engaged in a separate spatial working memory task. These results suggest that listeners with cochlear implants require greater cognitive processing during speech understanding than listeners with normal hearing, supported by compensatory recruitment of the left prefrontal cortex.