Tissue Regeneration: Regional differences
The regeneration of tissue is a tightly controlled process which ensures that adult stem cells generate an appropriate number of daughter cells in order to maintain healthy tissue in the face of daily wear and tear. Tissue regeneration lasts throughout an animal’s lifetime, but when it goes wrong the end results can include chronic wounds, premature aging and cancer (Fuchs and Chen, 2013). Skin tissue has a fast turnover rate, and many of the fundamental principles that govern tissue regeneration have been discovered in experiments on hair follicle stem cells in mice (Fuchs, 2016).
A hair follicle cycles through three phases: growth, regression and resting. Growth is powered by stem cells being activated to proliferate and generate daughter cells, and the extent to which this happens depends on the relative levels of activating signals (such as WNT) and inhibitory signals (such as BMP; Plikus and Chuong, 2014). However, we know relatively little about the mechanisms that control the levels of these signaling molecules in the first place. Now, in eLife, Qing Nie and Maksim Plikus of the University of California, Irvine and colleagues – including Qixuan Wang and Ji Won Oh as joint first authors – report new insights into these mechanisms based on a combination of simulations and experiments (Wang et al., 2017).
Wang et al. – who are based at Irvine and various institutes in the United States, Korea, China, Australia and Poland – started by using simulations of a simple model to show that certain features of the hair cycle in mice were not observed in the model if it was assumed that all the hair follicles were identical. This indicated that the hair follicles in the different regions of the skin expressed different levels of signal molecules, and that the diffusion of, say, WNT from regions with high levels of WNT influenced the behavior of neighboring regions that had lower levels of WNT to begin with. When the model was adjusted so that dorsal skin hair follicles went through the cycles slower than ventral skin hair follicles, the simulations produced hair cycle patterns similar to those seen in real mice, including waves of hair cycles spreading from ventral skin to dorsal skin.
To test whether or not there exist multiple regions of skin with distinct hair cycles, Wang et al. used a reporter line to detect the level of WNT activity in the skin of live mice in real time. This revealed that hair follicles in ventral chin skin have a shorter growth phase and a faster turnover rate than hair follicles in dorsal skin. To understand the molecular mechanism behind this difference, the researchers discovered that dorsal skin in its resting phase has enriched BMP ligands, depleted BMP antagonists and decreased WNT ligands compared to ventral chin skin. Experiments on transgenic mice confirmed that hair cycles were changed in regions in which BMP or WNT signaling had been perturbed: moreover, perturbing these signals also altered the waves of hair cycles that spread from ventral skin to dorsal skin.
The simulations also predicted that hair follicles would be in an extended resting phase when inhibitor levels are extremely high. Wang et al. observed such behavior in ear skin: the hair follicles in ear skin exist in a dormant resting phase for an extended period of time, with limited or no response to methods that would normally lead to hair growth. The researchers then discovered that the cartilage/muscle complex that is only found in the ear expresses high levels of BMP ligands and multiple WNT antagonists, and went on to show that dampening the BMP signal or increasing the WNT signal can partially activate the growth of hair follicles in the ear.
These experiments confirm that the BMP and WNT pathways control the regional pattern of hair regeneration that is observed, and that these pathways also mediate the interaction among these different regions. This is consistent with the well-known role of BMP/WNT signaling in the skin (Kandyba et al., 2013), but we do not know what gives rise to the intrinsically different levels of BMP and WNT found in the various regions.
Why is it important to understand regional tissue regeneration? Conventional studies often focus on a single hair follicle or a population of hair follicles within one region. These reductionist approaches were able to reveal some of the core principles governing tissue regeneration, but they also missed out on a whole dimension of regulation. Most tissues are composed of heterogeneous cell populations (Donati and Watt, 2015): different regions of skin, for example, differ in hair follicle length, epidermis thickness and pigmentation patterns, all of which serve unique functions (Chang, 2009; Chuong et al., 2013).
Likewise, such regional behavior is evident in many human diseases: for instance, non-segmental vitiligo involves the loss of skin melanocytes from patches of skin on both the left and right sides of the body (Taïeb and Picardo, 2009). These region-specific features suggest that tissue regeneration is regulated by some sort of 'molecular area code'. The next challenge is to work out how this area code works.
Module-based complexity formation: Periodic patterning in feathers and hairsWiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Developmental Biology 2:97–112.https://doi.org/10.1002/wdev.74
Stem cell heterogeneity and plasticity in epitheliaCell Stem Cell 16:465–476.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2015.04.014
Epithelial skin biology: Three decades of developmental biology, a hundred questions answered and a thousand new ones to addressCurrent Topics in Developmental Biology 116:357–374.https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.ctdb.2015.11.033
Macroenvironmental regulation of hair cycling and collective regenerative behaviorCold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine 4:a015198.https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a015198
Clinical practice VitiligoNew England Journal of Medicine 360:160–169.https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcp0804388
Article and author information
- Version of Record published: August 9, 2017 (version 1)
© 2017, Yu et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
- Page views
Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, Scopus, PubMed Central.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
- Computational and Systems Biology
Humans make a number of choices when they walk, such as how fast and for how long. The preferred steady walking speed seems chosen to minimize energy expenditure per distance traveled. But the speed of actual walking bouts is not only steady, but rather a time-varying trajectory, which can also be modulated by task urgency or an individual’s movement vigor. Here we show that speed trajectories and durations of human walking bouts are explained better by an objective to minimize Energy and Time, meaning the total work or energy to reach destination, plus a cost proportional to bout duration. Applied to a computational model of walking dynamics, this objective predicts dynamic speed vs. time trajectories with inverted U shapes. Model and human experiment (N=10) show that shorter bouts are unsteady and dominated by the time and effort of accelerating, and longer ones are steadier and faster and dominated by steady-state time and effort. Individual-dependent vigor may be characterized by the energy one is willing to spend to save a unit of time, which explains why some may walk faster than others, but everyone may have similar-shaped trajectories due to similar walking dynamics. Tradeoffs between energy and time costs can predict transient, steady, and vigor-related aspects of walking.
- Computational and Systems Biology
Cycling of co-substrates, whereby a metabolite is converted among alternate forms via different reactions, is ubiquitous in metabolism. Several cycled co-substrates are well known as energy and electron carriers (e.g. ATP and NAD(P)H), but there are also other metabolites that act as cycled co-substrates in different parts of central metabolism. Here, we develop a mathematical framework to analyse the effect of co-substrate cycling on metabolic flux. In the cases of a single reaction and linear pathways, we find that co-substrate cycling imposes an additional flux limit on a reaction, distinct to the limit imposed by the kinetics of the primary enzyme catalysing that reaction. Using analytical methods, we show that this additional limit is a function of the total pool size and turnover rate of the cycled co-substrate. Expanding from this insight and using simulations, we show that regulation of these two parameters can allow regulation of flux dynamics in branched and coupled pathways. To support these theoretical insights, we analysed existing flux measurements and enzyme levels from the central carbon metabolism and identified several reactions that could be limited by the dynamics of co-substrate cycling. We discuss how the limitations imposed by co-substrate cycling provide experimentally testable hypotheses on specific metabolic phenotypes. We conclude that measuring and controlling co-substrate dynamics is crucial for understanding and engineering metabolic fluxes in cells.