Radiomics: Rethinking the role of clinical imaging
Radiomics has the potential to improve the management of cancer patients, but further research is required before it can be adopted into routine clinical practice.
- University of Manchester, United Kingdom
- The Christie Hospital, United Kingdom
The pressing need to improve cancer survival rates continuously motivates scientists to uncover the genetic and molecular composition of tumors, and use this information to develop more effective cancer therapies. Since tumors differ in their biological makeup, treatments can now often be tailored towards individual patients, in a strategy termed ‘personalized medicine’ (Schilsky, 2010). However, personalized medicine can only improve patient outcomes if there are reliable tests available to identify and analyze the biology of individual tumors, and detect which patients benefit from a given therapy (La Thangue and Kerr, 2011).
Medical imaging techniques underpin much decision-making in cancer medicine and can be used to determine, among other things, the size of a tumor and if it has spread into the surrounding tissue or other parts of the body. These and other tumor characteristics act as prognostic indicators and can help clinicians assign treatments for patients and monitor their response to therapy. However, only a few imaging techniques have been approved for use as companion diagnostic tools or as predictive biomarkers that can identify which patients are likely to benefit from a specific therapy (O'Connor et al., 2017). Now, in eLife, a team of researchers led by Hugo Aerts, Robert Gillies and Philippe Lambin – including Patrick Grossmann as first author – report on how an image analysis approach called radiomics could be used to enhance personalized medicine (Grossmann et al., 2017).
Radiomics uses computer algorithms to process the data collected by different medical imaging techniques and is becoming increasingly popular in cancer imaging research. One of its key characteristics is that radiomics recognizes that digital medical images are not only pictures – they are also are complex data. Radiomic analyses extract and measure an array of ‘features’ that describe the image texture and distributions of individual voxel values – the units that make up a 3D image – within a tumor. Each voxel represents a tiny amount of tissue and contains around 105 to 107 neoplastic and stromal cells, depending on tumor type and voxel dimensions.
Features can be descriptive terms derived from radiology reports or mathematical quantities. Feature extraction requires several complex steps in a defined pipeline: defining the regions of interest and segmenting three-dimensional images, extracting features and converting images into ‘mineable’ data. Finally, data from imaging techniques, and from biofluids and tumor tissue, are combined into models to predict patient prognosis or benefit from a specific therapy (Brady et al., 2016; Gillies et al., 2016).
Grossmann et al. – who are based at various insitiutes in the USA, Candada and The Netherlands – used radiomics to extract over 600 image features in computer tomography images from 262 patients with non-small cell lung cancer. They next examined how these features relate to the molecular characteristics of the tumors (such as the modulation of immune pathways and tumor suppressor proteins) and whether radiomic features predicted if the patients recovered after treatment. The findings were validated on an independent set of data from 89 other patients. Grossmann et al. discovered a connection between the radiomic phenotype of a tumor, the signaling pathways inside cells that drive how cancer develops, and clinical treatment outcomes. Moreover, by combining the data from radiomic, molecular and clinical studies, the overall chance of a patient surviving the cancer could be better predicted than when using clinical data alone.
The study by Grossmann et al. demonstrates the potential strength of radiomics, especially when combined with genomic and clinical information. One of the main benefits is that medical imaging data acquired in routine healthcare can be used in a new way to inform clinicians about the biology of a tumor and provide potential prognostic or predictive information. Imaging data from a large number of patients can be investigated rapidly. Further, radiomic image analysis is a non-invasive procedure that provides three-dimensional reconstructions of a tumor and avoids the problems associated with samples obtained through invasive biopsies (O'Connor et al., 2015).
However, several challenges need to be overcome before radiomics can be used as a companion diagnostic or predictive tool. Significant statistical problems can arise from analysis of such ‘big data’, with overfitting leading to relationships being seen were there are none (false discovery; Limkin et al., 2017). Once relationships are discovered, these findings need to be replicated in prospective studies.
Moreover, the terminology used for the derived image features needs to be standardized. At present, different investigators use their own names for the features, which makes it difficult to compare data between studies. In addition, the number of features incorporated into radiomic analyzes appears to vary even within individual research groups, leading to a phenomenon termed 'biomarker drift'. Biomarkers only become fit for guiding clinical decision-making when they become fixed in their acquisition, analysis and quality assurance processes, all defined clearly in standardized operating procedures (O'Connor et al., 2015).
Finally, ‘Picture Archiving and Communications System’ platforms must be adapted to integrate with radiomics algorithms in order to enable widespread clinical use. This will require coordinated efforts from clinical researchers and imaging scientists, along with additional computational power and infrastructure.
While considerable effort is required to rise to these challenges, the potential rewards are great. If enough evidence of the predictive power of radiomics can be produced, then radiomics may become a viable solution to help deliver personalized medicine in the clinic.
References
-
Oncological image analysisMedical Image Analysis 33:7–12.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2016.06.012
-
Predictive biomarkers: a paradigm shift towards personalized cancer medicineNature Reviews Clinical Oncology 8:587–596.https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2011.121
-
Imaging intratumor heterogeneity: role in therapy response, resistance, and clinical outcomeClinical Cancer Research 21:249–257.https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0990
-
Imaging biomarker roadmap for cancer studiesNature Reviews Clinical Oncology 14:169–186.https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.162
-
Personalized medicine in oncology: the future is nowNature Reviews Drug Discovery 9:363–366.https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd3181
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2017, O'Connor
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 2,243
- views
-
- 211
- downloads
-
- 14
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Radiomics: Rethinking the role of clinical imaging
eLife 6:e30563.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.30563
Further reading
-
- Cancer Biology
- Cell Biology
Understanding the cell cycle at the single-cell level is crucial for cellular biology and cancer research. While current methods using fluorescent markers have improved the study of adherent cells, non-adherent cells remain challenging. In this study, we addressed this gap by combining a specialized surface to enhance cell attachment, the FUCCI(CA)2 sensor, an automated image analysis pipeline, and a custom machine learning algorithm. This approach enabled precise measurement of cell cycle phase durations in non-adherent cells. This method was validated in acute myeloid leukemia cell lines NB4 and Kasumi-1, which have unique cell cycle characteristics, and we tested the impact of cell cycle-modulating drugs on NB4 cells. Our cell cycle analysis system, which is also compatible with adherent cells, is fully automated and freely available, providing detailed insights from hundreds of cells under various conditions. This report presents a valuable tool for advancing cancer research and drug development by enabling comprehensive, automated cell cycle analysis in both adherent and non-adherent cells.
-
- Cancer Biology
- Computational and Systems Biology
Effects from aging in single cells are heterogenous, whereas at the organ- and tissue-levels aging phenotypes tend to appear as stereotypical changes. The mammary epithelium is a bilayer of two major phenotypically and functionally distinct cell lineages: luminal epithelial and myoepithelial cells. Mammary luminal epithelia exhibit substantial stereotypical changes with age that merit attention because these cells are the putative cells-of-origin for breast cancers. We hypothesize that effects from aging that impinge upon maintenance of lineage fidelity increase susceptibility to cancer initiation. We generated and analyzed transcriptomes from primary luminal epithelial and myoepithelial cells from younger <30 (y)ears old and older >55y women. In addition to age-dependent directional changes in gene expression, we observed increased transcriptional variance with age that contributed to genome-wide loss of lineage fidelity. Age-dependent variant responses were common to both lineages, whereas directional changes were almost exclusively detected in luminal epithelia and involved altered regulation of chromatin and genome organizers such as SATB1. Epithelial expression of gap junction protein GJB6 increased with age, and modulation of GJB6 expression in heterochronous co-cultures revealed that it provided a communication conduit from myoepithelial cells that drove directional change in luminal cells. Age-dependent luminal transcriptomes comprised a prominent signal that could be detected in bulk tissue during aging and transition into cancers. A machine learning classifier based on luminal-specific aging distinguished normal from cancer tissue and was highly predictive of breast cancer subtype. We speculate that luminal epithelia are the ultimate site of integration of the variant responses to aging in their surrounding tissue, and that their emergent phenotype both endows cells with the ability to become cancer-cells-of-origin and represents a biosensor that presages cancer susceptibility.
