Current understanding of aggressive human basal-like triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains incomplete. In this study, we show endothelial lipase (LIPG) is aberrantly overexpressed in basal-like TNBCs. We demonstrate that LIPG is required for in vivo tumorigenicity and metastasis of TNBC cells. LIPG possesses a lipase-dependent function that supports cancer cell proliferation and a lipase-independent function that promotes invasiveness, stemness and basal/epithelial-mesenchymal transition features of TNBC. Mechanistically, LIPG executes its oncogenic function through its involvement in interferon-related DTX3L-ISG15 signaling, which regulates protein function and stability by ISGylation. We show that DTX3L, an E3-ubiquitin ligase, is required for maintaining LIPG protein levels in TNBC cells by inhibiting proteasome-mediated LIPG degradation. Inactivation of LIPG impairs DTX3L-ISG15 signaling, indicating the existence of DTX3L-LIPG-ISG15 signaling. We further reveal LIPG-ISG15 signaling is lipase-independent. We demonstrate that DTX3L-LIPG-ISG15 signaling is essential for malignancies of TNBC cells. Targeting this pathway provides a novel strategy for basal-like TNBC therapy.https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.31334.001
Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease and has been classified into several molecular subtypes, including basal-like, HER2-positive, and luminal breast cancers (Perou et al., 2000; Sørlie et al., 2001). The majority of diagnosed basal-like breast cancer is triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), which is characterized by its lack of estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR), and HER2 receptors, and contributes to the lack of targeted therapies for basal-like breast cancer (Rakha et al., 2009). Basal-like TNBC is highly aggressive, with poor clinical outcomes due to its high tumor grade, increased rate of proliferation and metastasis, and frequent recurrence (Sørlie et al., 2001; Sorlie et al., 2003; Badve et al., 2011). Basal-like TNBC is highly associated with the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) (Lehmann et al., 2011). Moreover, basal-like TNBCs are enriched for poorly differentiated cancer stem cells (CSCs) with the CD24-CD44+ phenotype (Honeth et al., 2008). These EMT and CSC features contribute to aggressiveness, metastasis and chemoresistance of basal-like TNBC. Nevertheless, what pathological factors confer these features on basal-like TNBC remain largely unknown.
Cancer cells are known to manifest metabolic dysregulation (e.g. the Warburg Effect) (Koppenol et al., 2011). In addition to deregulation of carbohydrate metabolism, dysregulation of lipid uptake, synthesis and metabolism has been found in various types of cancer and some of these alterations have been shown to be crucial for tumorigenesis (Santos and Schulze, 2012; Baumann et al., 2013; Beloribi-Djefaflia et al., 2016; Slebe et al., 2016). Lipoprotein lipases belong to the triglyceride (TG) lipase gene family and play a crucial role in the metabolism and cellular uptake of plasma lipoproteins (McCoy et al., 2002). Lipoprotein lipases enzymatically digest lipoproteins to liberate their lipid contents (McCoy et al., 2002). The released lipid precursors can be taken up by the cell for incorporation into lipid synthesis or lipid metabolism to generate energy (Slebe et al., 2016). In addition, lipoprotein lipases promote the binding and cellular uptake of lipoproteins in an enzyme-independent manner (Strauss et al., 2002). Aberrant lipoprotein lipase expression has been reported to contribute to lipid dysregulation in several types of cancer and promote tumorigenesis by supplying cancer cells with lipid precursors, a high-energy fuel for cancer cell proliferation (Nielsen et al., 2010; Slebe et al., 2016; Cadenas et al., 2012). However, whether and how lipoprotein lipase dysregulation impacts on other malignant features (e.g. invasiveness, stemness, EMT) remain uncharacterized.
The interferon-stimulated gene 15 (ISG15) encodes an interferon (IFN)-inducible, ubiquitin-like protein. In cells, ISG15 is conjugated to an array of proteins (a process called ISGylation) functionally implicated in various cellular processes, encompassing IFN-induced immune responses and the modulation of cellular protein turnover (e.g. Ubiquitin/26S Proteasome Pathway) (Desai et al., 2006; Hermann and Bogunovic, 2017). Growing studies show that ISG15 expression and protein ISGylation are dysregulated in numerous types of cancer and play a crucial role in tumorigenesis (Sgorbissa and Brancolini, 2012). For example, aberrant overexpression of ISG15 has been shown to promote breast cancer cell invasion and tumorigenicity by disrupting cytoskeletal architecture, promoting cellular motility and enhancing the oncogenic function of Ki-Ras (Hadjivasiliou, 2012; Burks et al., 2014). Elevated ISG15 expression has been reported in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) with co-inactivation of both tumor suppressor genes p53 and ARF and is required for tumorigenic phenotypes exhibited in transformed MEFs (Forys et al., 2014). Given that TNBCs frequently displayed defects in both p53 and ARF and over half of TNBCs overexpressed ISG15 (Forys et al., 2014), these findings suggest the potential role of ISG15 in TNBC development and progression.
Deltex (DTX)−3-like E3 ubiquitin ligase (DTX3L/BBAP) gains attention due to its roles in immune responses, DNA damage signaling and tumorigenesis. IFN-β and IFN-γ have been shown to induce DTX3L expression, suggesting its physiological involvement in IFN inflammatory signaling (Juszczynski et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2015b). Moreover, DTX3L regulates DNA damage repair by promoting the recruitment of BRCA1 and 53BP1 to DNA damage sites (Yan et al., 2009; Yan et al., 2013). DTX3L has been recently linked to cancer due to its role in promoting metastasis of melanoma via activation of the FAK/PI3K/AKT signaling pathway (Thang et al., 2015). DTX3L is reported to positively regulate the expression of IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs), including ISG15, through mono-ubiquitination of a subset of histones (Zhang et al., 2015b). Given the increasing importance of both DTX3L and ISG15 in tumorigenic regulation, the DTX3L-ISG15 regulatory axis may play a pivotal role in cancer development and progression, and deserves further study in TNBC.
In this study, we have found that compared to other breast cancer subtypes, basal-like TNBCs preferentially overexpress endothelial lipase (LIPG), a member of the TG lipase gene family. Our studies further show that LIPG overexpression promotes the development and metastasis of basal-like TNBC through its functional involvement in the oncogenic DTX3L-ISG15 signaling pathway. Moreover, our findings show that LIPG possesses both lipase-dependent and lipase-independent functions to promote the different aspects of basal-like TNBC malignancy. Our findings provide novel insights into the oncogenic role of LIPG in breast cancer and its functional link to IFN-related signaling.
To explore the roles of lipoprotein lipases in breast cancer, we performed in silico gene expression analysis of lipoprotein lipases, including lipoprotein lipase (LPL), hepatic lipase C (LIPC) and endothelial lipase G (LIPG), in breast cancer using the Oncomine cancer gene expression database (https://www.oncomine.org) (Rhodes et al., 2007). We found that both LPL and LIPC were underexpressed in invasive ductal carcinomas (IDCs) and were not differentially expressed among distinct molecular breast cancer subtypes (Figure 1—figure supplement 1 and Figure 1—figure supplement 2). In contrast, LIPG expression was significantly elevated in TNBCs when compared to normal breast, HER2-positive and ER-positive luminal IDCs (Figure 1A) according to in silico analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset. Consistently, analysis of the Gluck dataset (Glück et al., 2012) showed that overall LIPG was expressed at a higher level in basal-like breast cancers (BLBC) than in luminal-A/B breast cancers (Figure 1B). These in silico analyses suggest a potential role of LIPG in basal-like TNBC.
To validate these in silico analyses, we performed qRT-PCR analysis of LIPG mRNA expression in normal breast tissues (n = 6), TNBCs, and luminal breast cancers (LuBCs) positive for ER and PR markers (n = 8 for each subtype). Consistently, the data showed that LIPG mRNA expression was significantly higher in TNBCs compared to normal breast tissues and LuBCs (Figure 1C). To further confirm the qRT-PCR data, LIPG protein expression was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in the same cohort of breast tumor tissue samples. To expand the breast cancer tissue cohorts of LuBC and TNBC in IHC studies, we also performed IHC analysis of tissue microarrays encompassing 100 breast cancer cases. A total of 66 breast cancer cases on tissue microarrays were successfully stained by the LIPG antibody (Figure 1—figure supplement 3), including 47 LuBC and 10 TNBC cases. By combining the microarray tissue cohort with the aforementioned tissue cohort, IHC staining results of 55 LuBC and 18 TNBC cases were subjected to H-score analysis (Figure 1D). In line with LIPG mRNA expression data, LIPG protein was detected at a higher level in TNBCs than in LuBCs according to H-score analysis of IHC-stained samples (Figure 1D and Figure 1—figure supplement 4).
To examine LIPG expression in breast cancer cell lines, we performed in silico analysis of LIPG mRNA expression in the Hoeflich dataset (Hoeflich et al., 2009) retrieved from the Oncomine database, including microarray expression datasets of 48 different breast cancer cell lines [basal-like (n = 20), Her2-amplified (n = 15) and luminal (n = 13)]. Consistent with results from breast cancer tissues, LIPG was expressed at a higher level in basal-like cell lines when compared to Her2-amplified and luminal cell lines (Figure 1E). To confirm the in silico analysis result, we performed western blot analysis of LIPG protein expression on four basal-like TNBC (MCF10DCIS (Miller et al., 2000; Hu et al., 2008), MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468 and Hs578T) and two LuBC (T47D and MCF7) cell lines. We included a LIPG-overexpressing MCF7 cell line (MCF7-LIPG) as a positive control in the experiment. LIPG protein has been detected at 68 kDa and 40 kDa in cell lysates, which represent glycosylated full-length LIPG and cleaved LIPG protein, respectively (Edmondson et al., 2009). As shown in Figure 1F, high 68 kDa LIPG expression was detected in TNBC, but not in LuBC cell lines, and high 40 kDa LIPG expression was only detected in Hs578T cells. These data indicate that glycosylated, full-length LIPG protein is the predominant form expressed in TNBC cell lines.
To reveal the functional role of LIPG in breast cancer, we created the LIPG-overexpressing MCF7 cell line (MCF7-LIPG) whose parental cells lack LIPG expression (Figure 1F). To assess the effect of LIPG overexpression on cell growth, we compared the growth rates of parental MCF7 and MCF7-LIPG with or without LIPG knockdown by siRNA. Western blot analysis was performed to confirm LIPG overexpression in MCF7-LIPG cells and the efficiency of LIPG siRNA in knockdown of both 68 kDa and 40 kDa LIPG proteins in MCF7-LIPG cells (Figure 2—figure supplement 1). As expected, LIPG knockdown had no impact on the growth of parental MCF7 cells (MCF7-CTRL) with LIPG deficiency (Figure 2A). However, although MCF7 cell growth was not significantly affected by LIPG overexpression during the 3-day growth period, LIPG knockdown dramatically inhibited the growth of MCF7-LIPG cells (Figure 2A). These results suggest that the growth of MCF7 cells becomes reliant on LIPG after overexpression of this lipase gene.
To examine whether LIPG regulates cell motility and stemness, we performed migration and stem-cell sphere assays on parental MCF7-CTRL and MCF7-LIPG with or without LIPG knockdown. The data showed that LIPG overexpression promoted migration and primary as well as secondary CSC sphere formation of MCF7 cells, whereas these enhanced aggressive phenotypes reverted to their parental phenotypes after LIPG knockdown (Figure 2B and C). We also analyzed the CD24/CD44 profiles of these four different cell samples. The percentage of CD24-/CD44+ cells representing the CSC-enriched population doubled in MCF7-LIPG cells compared to parental control cells, and LIPG knockdown reverted the CSC population back to the baseline value (Figure 2D). To examine the impact of LIPG overexpression on the luminal feature of MCF7 cells, flow cytometric analysis of the luminal marker EpCAM was performed on parental MCF7-CTRL and MCF7-LIPG with or without LIPG knockdown. The FACS data indicated that LIPG overexpression significantly decreased EpCAMhigh cells (41.92 ± 4.21% of MCF7-LIPG + siControl vs. 61.79 ± 3.11% of MCF7-CTRL + siControl, p<0.01) and LIPG knockdown almost abolished this effect (56.83 ± 2.64%, p<0.01) (Figure 2E). To decipher whether LIPG-mediated effects involve changes in expression of basal/EMT and stem cell-related genes, gene expression profiling was performed. The results showed that LIPG overexpression led to increased expression of basal/myoepithelial (KRT14), EMT transcription factor (ZEB1) and stem cell (IL6, CD133, PROCR, SOX9) genes, and decreased expression of E-cadherin (Figure 2F and G), whereas LIPG knockdown abolished these expression alterations. These results are consistent with the observed phenotypic changes in MCF7 cells induced by LIPG overexpression. MCF7 cells are known to lack vimentin expression. The immunostaining experiment showed that LIPG overexpression was not sufficient to induce vimentin expression in MCF7 cells (data not shown). As expected, LIPG siRNA-transfected MCF7-CTRL cells showed no significant differences in these phenotypic features when compared to control siRNA-transfected MCF7-CTRL cells (Figure 2). These findings together indicate that LIPG functions to promote basal-like features, EMT, and stemness of breast cancer cells.
To reveal whether the metabolic role of LIPG is relevant to LIPG-mediated enhancements of basal/EMT, migratory and cancer stem cell features, we created a MCF7 cell line (MCF7- LIPGS149A) stably expressing a catalytically inactive mutant of LIPG (S149A), which has been shown to lose the lipase catalytic activity (Broedl et al., 2003). By comparing this mutant line with parental and wild-type LIPG-expressing lines, we were able to examine both enzymatic and non-enzymatic effects of LIPG in cancer cells. First, we performed western blot analysis to examine the protein expression level of LIPGS149A in the established MCF7 line. As shown in Figure 3A, the MCF7-LIPGS149A line expressed the LIPG mutant protein at the level similar to that of the wild-type LIPG-expressing MCF7 line (MCF7-LIPG). We next examined the growth rate of MCF7-LIPGS149A cells for 4 days by comparison with the parental control (MCF7-CTRL) and MCF7-LIPG cells. We found that LIPGS149A overexpression inhibited approximately 50% of the MCF7 cell growth rate, while wild-type LIPG overexpression only suppressed approximately 20% of the MCF7 cell growth rate (Figure 3B). The absence of the lipase catalytic activity of LIPG in MCF7-LIPGS149A cells led to loss of approximate 30% of the cell growth rate when compared to MCF7-LIPG cells, suggesting that the lipase activity of LIPG plays a role in promoting cell growth.
To determine the impact of LIPGS149A overexpression on cell migration, we performed transwell-based migration assays. Interestingly, overexpression of LIPGS149A was highly effective to induce an approximately seven-fold increase in migration of MCF7 cells, which was stronger than the five-fold increase caused by wild-type LIPG overexpression (p<0.05) (Figure 3C). This finding indicates that the lipase function of LIPG is not required for LIPG to promote MCF7 migration. With regard to the impact of LIPGS149A overexpression on CSCs, we conducted primary and secondary CSC sphere formation assays. As shown in Figure 3D, LIPGS149A was competent to enhance primary and secondary CSC sphere formation of MCF7 in spite of the fact that CSC spheres were smaller compared with those from control MCF7-CTRL cells. The extent of this CSC enhancement was similar to that of MCF7-LIPG. Nevertheless, wild-type LIPG overexpression led to the formation of larger CSC spheres, which was in contrast to smaller CSC spheres formed from MCF7-LIPGS149A (Figure 3D). These findings suggest that although the effect of LIPG on the sphere formation (self-renewal) ability of CSCs is largely independent of its lipase activity, this metabolic lipase function is required for LIPG to promote the CSC proliferation rate, resulting in increased sphere sizes. Moreover, flow cytometric analysis showed that LIPGS149A was proficient in increasing the CD24-/CD44+ CSC population in MCF7 cells and its increased extent was greater than that of MCF7-LIPG (15.06 ± 0.75% of MCF7-LIPGS149A vs. 10.77 ± 1.19% of MCF7-LIPG, p<0.01) (Figure 3E). We noted that the sphere data of MCF7-LIPGS149A (197 ± 28 primary CSC spheres/1000 cells from MCF7-LIPGS149A vs. 242 ± 18 primary CSC spheres/1000 cells from MCF7-LIPG, p=0.0806) (Figure 3D) did not reflect the further increased CD24-/CD44+ population observed in MCF7-LIPGS149A (Figure 3E). Given that the sphere result is the combined outcome of both self-renewal and the proliferation rate of CSCs, some of the formed CSC spheres from MCF7-LIPGS149A were too small (<50 μm) to be counted due to low sphere cell proliferation and they were excluded from the sphere count. This caused the discrepancy between the results of CSC sphere and CD24/CD44 profiling analyses.
To determine the impact of LIPGS149A on basal/EMT features of breast cancer cells, we examined expression of basal/EMT genes in MCF7- LIPGS149A compared with MCF7-CTRL and MCF7-LIPG using flow cytometry, qRT-PCR and immunofluorescence analyses. We found that similar to wild-type LIPG, LIPGS149A was capable of downregulating expression of EpCAM and E-cadherin and upregulating expression of KRT14 and ZEB1 genes (Figure 3F, G and H). These data suggest that the lipase activity of LIPG is dispensable for the LIPG-mediated promotion of basal/EMT phenotypes in breast cancer cells, consistent with the migration data (Figure 3C). In line with CSC sphere and CD24/CD44 data, LIPGS149A had most of the wild-type LIPG ability to enhance expression of stem cell genes (IL6, CD133 and PROCR) (Figure 3G). These findings, taken together, suggest that LIPG possesses both lipase-dependent and lipase-independent functions in promoting various tumorigenic characteristics of breast cancer cells.
To reveal the role of LIPG in basal-like TNBC, we performed LIPG knockdown studies on basal-like TNBC cell lines MCF10DCIS and MDA-MB-468, both of which express significant levels of full-length 68 kDa LIPG protein (Figure 1F). The knockdown efficiency of two different siRNAs was confirmed by western blot analysis (Figure 4—figure supplement 1). We found that LIPG knockdown in MCF10DCIS by either siRNA markedly suppressed cell growth, migration, invasion and CSC sphere formation (Figure 4A, B, C and D). These alterations correlated with increased EpCAM-positive cells, downregulated expression of multiple stem-cell and basal/EMT programming genes, elevated E-cadherin protein levels and decreased vimentin protein levels (Figure 4E, F, G, H and I). These findings indicate that LIPG expression is required for tumorigenic, basal-like and EMT characteristics of MCF10DCIS cells.
In order to study the role of LIPG in tumorigenicity and metastasis of basal-like TNBC, we created two stable LIPG-knockdown MDA-MB-468 cell lines, each of which expressed a distinct LIPG shRNA. LIPG knockdown of these two lines was confirmed by western blot analysis (Figure 5—figure supplement 1). Consistent with the MCF10DCIS results, LIPG deficiency substantially impaired cell growth, migration, invasion and CSC sphere formation of MDA-MB-468 cells (Figure 5A, B, C and D). Xenograft studies also demonstrated that LIPG depletion completely inhibited the in vivo tumor development of MDA-MB-468 in nude mice (Figure 5E). Consistently, LIPG inactivation resulted in downregulating expression of multiple stem-cell and EMT programming genes, including downregulation of vimentin protein expression (Figure 5F and G and Figure 5—figure supplement 2). MDA-MB-468 is an E-cadherin-negative cell line. The immunostaining experiment showed that LIPG knockdown was not sufficient to induce E-cadherin expression in MDA-MB-468 cells (data not shown). Moreover, over 50% of LIPG-depleted MDA-MB-468 cells expressed the luminal protein marker EpCAM compared to only 3% of the control cells showing EpCAM positivity (Figure 5H), indicating that loss of LIPG significantly promotes the luminal feature in MDA-MB-468 cells. This finding correlated with a morphological change in LIPG-knockdown MDA-MB-468 cell lines that manifested epithelial-like morphology in contrast to the mesenchymal-like morphology of the control cell line (Figure 5—figure supplement 3). To determine the role of LIPG in TNBC metastasis in vivo, we conducted animal metastasis assays. As shown in Figure 5I, found tumor foci were identified in the animal group injected with control scramble shRNA-expressing MDA-MB-468 cells, but not in the group injected with LIPG shRNA-expressing cells. These tumor foci formed in the lungs of the control group exhibited strong IHC staining of vimentin in contrast to vimentin negativity in lung tissue. As MDA-MB-468 cells expressed the high levels of vimentin (Figure 5—figure supplement 2), IHC results have confirmed that these tumor foci found in lungs were derived from metastasis of MDA-MB-468. Statistically analyzing numbers of lung metastatic tumor foci in both animal groups showed that LIPG knockdown by shRNA completely abrogated in vivo lung metastasis of MDA-MB-468 cells in nude mice (p<0.01). These findings demonstrate that LIPG is crucial for malignancies and metastasis of basal-like TNBC.
To unravel the underlying mechanism mediating the oncogenic function of LIPG, we performed proteomic profiling analysis on MCF7-LIPG and parental control cells. Surprisingly, among upregulated proteins (the fold ≥2.0) we identified in MCF7-LIPG cells, 15 out of them are encoded by interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs). Eight ISGs (B2M, IFITM2, ISG15, MVP, NEDD4, S100A8, S100A9, UBE2L6) belong to IFN type I and II, five ISGs (AGR2, EIF2B2, JARID2, S100A7, TTC21A) are specific to IFN type I, and two ISGs (AKR1C2, CTSD) are specific to IFN type II (Figure 6—figure supplement 1). Among these upregulated ISG proteins, ISG15 and UBE2L6/UBCH8 were of interest. ISG15 has been shown to be involved in some subtypes of breast cancer, including TNBC (Hadjivasiliou, 2012; Burks et al., 2014; Forys et al., 2014), and UBE2L6/UBCH8, a ubiquitin conjugating E2 enzyme, has been reported to mediate ISG15 conjugation (Zhao et al., 2004). Therefore, we hypothesized that ISG15 mediates the oncogenic function of LIPG. To test this hypothesis, we first examined whether ISG15 expression is LIPG-dependent. From qRT-PCR and western blot analyses, we found that knockdown of endogenous LIPG in MCF10DCIS and MDA-MB-468 downregulated the mRNA and protein expression of ISG15 (Figure 6A and B). Furthermore, ectopic expression of LIPG in MCF7, MCF10DCIS and MDA-MB-468 led to the induction of ISG15 mRNA and protein expression, which was abolished by concurrent LIPG siRNA knockdown (Figure 6A and B). We noticed that a basal level of ISG15 protein expression was detectable in parental MCF7 cells (Figure 6B), suggesting that there is a LIPG-independent mechanism for sustaining ISG15 expression in LIPG-deficient luminal breast cancer cells. Interestingly, ISG15 expression became reliant on LIPG in MCF7-LIPG cells, suggesting that LIPG overexpression might have reprogrammed MCF7 cells and rendered ISG15 expression dependent on LIPG. Moreover, the catalytically inactive mutant of LIPG (LIPGS149A) was capable of upregulating ISG15 expression in MCF7 cells (Figure 6C), suggesting that the lipase activity of LIPG is dispensable for the LIPG-ISG15 signaling axis. Relevantly, this positive regulatory relationship between LIPG and ISG15 was further confirmed by in silico analysis of 45 cases of BLBC using the Oncomine database (Figure 6D).
To reveal the functional role of ISG15 in basal-like TNBC, we performed ISG15 knockdown on MCF10DCIS and MDA-MB-468 cells using a validated siRNA that has been reported elsewhere (Zhang et al., 2015a). ISG15 knockdown in both cell lines by this siRNA was confirmed by western blot analysis (Figure 6—figure supplement 2). We observed that ISG15 knockdown had no impact on LIPG protein levels (Figure 6—figure supplement 2), indicating that there is no feedback regulation occurring in the LIPG-ISG15 axis. The knockdown studies showed that loss of ISG15 moderately impaired cell growth and CSC sphere formation of MCF10DCIS and MDA-MB-468, but substantially inhibited migration and invasion of both cell lines (Figure 6E, F, G and H). These data indicate that the invasiveness of MCF10DCIS and MDA-MB-468 highly relies on ISG15 function. Consistently, ISG15-knockdown MCF10DCIS cells manifested a significantly decreased basal feature, indicated by a dramatic increase in the percentage of EpCAM+ cells in ISG15-knockdown MCF10DCIS (from 31.93 ± 6.53% of the control to 60.66 ± 5.78%, p<0.01) (Figure 6I). Moreover, qRT-PCR studies showed that ISG15 depletion in MCF10DCIS cells profoundly downregulated expression of multiple EMT programming genes (Figure 6J). In line with the qRT-PCR data, immunofluorescent analysis showed that ISG15 knockdown led to a reduction in EMT features of TNBC cells, characterized by E-cadherin upregulation in MCF10DCIS and vimentin downregulation in both MCF10DCIS and MDA-MB-468 (Figure 6K and Figure 6—figure supplement 3). In contrast, only two stem cell genes were affected by ISG15 knockdown in MCF10DCIS cells (Figure 6J). These data suggest that ISG15 more selectively regulates EMT genes than stem-cell genes, consistent with the observed functional effects of ISG15. These findings together imply that ISG15 mainly mediates the basal/EMT-promoting function of LIPG.
To demonstrate that ISG15 functions downstream of LIPG and mediates the LIPG effect, we examined the role of ISG15 in LIPG-overexpressing MDA-MB-468 cells that showed an approximately two-fold increase in invasion (Figure 6L). Similar to LIPG knockdown, ISG15 knockdown inhibited approximately 90% invasion of LIPG-overexpressing MDA-MB-468 cells (Figure 6L). Consistently, ISG15 knockdown abolished the increased expression of three EMT programming genes in LIPG-overexpressing MDA-MB-468 cells, similar to the effect of LIPG knockdown (Figure 6M). These findings demonstrate that ISG15 is the downstream mediator of LIPG signaling and mainly functions as a promoter of invasiveness and the basal phenotype.
We next sought to identify what molecular regulators are involved in aberrant overexpression of LIPG in basal-like TNBC. Given that LIPG overexpression in MCF7 cells induced expression of IFN signature genes, including ISG15, we tested whether IFN signaling regulators are involved in modulating LIPG expression in TNBC cells. Among these known regulators, DTX3L drew our interest as it activates expression of ISG15 and other IFN-responsive genes by regulating the mono-ubiquitination of histones and has been found to function as an oncogenic factor in metastasis of melanoma (Thang et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2015b). Due to these potential facts and the unknown function of DTX3L in breast cancer, we performed DTX3L knockdown studies to reveal its role in LIPG signaling in basal-like TNBC cells.
Western blot studies showed that two different DTX3L siRNAs successfully knocked down over 90% of DTX3L protein expression in MCF10DCIS and MDA-MB-468 cells (Figure 7A). Surprisingly, DTX3L knockdown by either siRNA resulted in dramatic downregulation of LIPG protein expression in both cell lines (Figure 7A). To determine whether the DTX3L-dependent expression of LIPG is regulated at the mRNA level, we performed qRT-PCR experiments on these siRNA-transfected cell samples. As shown in Figure 7B, DTX3L knockdown only led to approximately 25% and 40% decreases in LIPG mRNA levels of MCF10DCIS and MDA-MB-468 cells, respectively. Since the modest decrease of LIPG mRNA levels caused by DTX3L deficiency could not completely account for the dramatic change in LIPG protein levels, we next tested whether DTX3L regulates LIPG protein stability. We examined LIPG protein levels in control and DTX3L-knockdown MDA-MB-468 cells treated with the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide in a time course experiment. The result showed that DTX3L-knockdown cells displayed a shorter LIPG protein half-life (approximate 1 hr) compared to control cells with a longer LIPG half-life (approximate 4 hr) (Figure 7C), indicating that loss of DTX3L significantly decreased LIPG protein stability. To decipher whether this observed event was attributable to enhanced degradation of LIPG protein, we treated DTX3L siRNA-transfected cells with the proteasome inhibitor MG-132. MG-132 treatment restored approximately 75% and 60% of control LIPG protein levels in DTX3L-knockdown MCF10DCIS and MDA-MB-468 cells, respectively (Figure 7D). These findings indicate that DTX3L is required for protecting LIPG from protein degradation in basal-like TNBC cells.
To determine whether DTX3L functions as an activator upstream of the LIPG-ISG15 signaling pathway, we performed gain- and loss-of-function studies of DTX3L in combination with LIPG knockdown. As shown in Figure 7E, knockdown of endogenous DTX3L dramatically downregulated the protein expression of LIPG and ISG15 in both MCF10DCIS and MDA-MB-468, whereas exogenous DTX3L overexpression enhanced expression of LIPG and ISG15 in both cell lines. Furthermore, similar to the DTX3L-knockdown effect on ISG15, LIPG knockdown completely abolished the induction of ISG15 expression in DTX3L-overexpressing MCF10DCIS and MDA-MB-468 cells without affecting the protein levels of overexpressed DTX3L (Figure 7E), demonstrating that LIPG mediates the DTX3L-dependent effect to increase ISG15 expression. Knockdown of either LIPG or ISG15 had no impact on endogenous DTX3L protein levels in MCF10DCIS and MDA-MB-468 cells (Figure 7—figure supplement 1). These findings, taken together, indicate that DTX3L functions as an upstream regulator activating the LIPG-ISG15 signaling axis.
The expression and functional role of DTX3L in breast cancer have not yet been explored. To reveal the expression of DTX3L in breast cancer tissues, we conducted in silico analysis of DTX3L mRNA expression in breast cancer using the Oncomine database. The analyses of two breast cancer datasets, TCGA and Curtis (Curtis et al., 2012), indicated that DTX3L was overexpressed in IDC compared to normal breast (Figure 7F). Differential expression of DTX3L was not significant among different molecular subtypes of breast cancer (Figure 7—figure supplement 2), suggesting that DTX3L may play a role in other breast cancer subtypes in addition to its role in basal-like TNBC. To determine whether DTX3L expression is positively associated with LIPG expression in TNBC, IHC studies were performed on nine cases of TNBC. Some representative IHC staining pictures are shown in Figure 7—figure supplement 3. After H-scoring of IHC staining data, we found that DTX3L protein staining was positively correlated with LIPG protein staining (p<0.01) (Figure 7G). DTX3L mRNA levels were also positively associated with ISG15 mRNA levels (p<0.001) according to in silico analysis of BLBC cases (n = 45) (Figure 7H). These findings suggest the existence of the DTX3L-LIPG-ISG15 signaling pathway in human basal-like TNBC.
To reveal the functional role of DTX3L in basal-like TNBC, we first conducted DTX3L knockdown studies on MCF10DCIS cells. As shown in Figure 8A, DTX3L knockdown by either one of two siRNAs profoundly impaired cell growth as well as CSC sphere formation and abrogated migratory and invasive abilities of MCF10DCIS cells. Consistently, DTX3L inactivation resulted in an approximately two-fold increase in the EpCAM+ cell population, decreased expression of stem-cell and basal/EMT programming genes and the reduced EMT (E-cadherin upregulation and vimentin downregulation) in MCF10DCIS cells (Figure 8B, C, D and E). DTX3L knockdown also led to downregulation of vimentin protein expression in MDA-MB-468 cells (Figure 8F). These data indicate that DTX3L is required for invasiveness, stemness and basal/EMT features of TNBC.
We next sought to investigate whether LIPG and ISG15 mediate the functional effects of DTX3L in basal-like TNBC cells. To address this question, we examined the impact of knocking down either LIPG or ISG15 in DTX3L-overexpressing MDA-MB-468 cells. Exogenous DTX3L overexpression promoted invasion, CSC sphere formation and expression of stem-cell and EMT genes, whereas DTX3L knockdown completely abolished these phenotypes (Figure 8G, H and I), demonstrating that these observed events were DTX3L-specific. LIPG knockdown also effectively abolished all of these DTX3L-overexpression phenotypes (Figure 8G, H and I), indicating that LIPG mediates the enhancing effect of DTX3L on invasiveness, stemness and basal/EMT features of MDA-MB-468 cells. Moreover, ISG15 knockdown suppressed DTX3L-overexpression-promoted invasion more significantly than its inhibitory effect on CSC sphere formation (Figure 8G and H). These results corroborated the gene expression data which showed that ISG15 knockdown inhibited DTX3L-mediated expression of EMT genes more potently than it suppressed the elevated expression of stem-cell genes (Figure 8I). Xenograft studies further demonstrated that similar to DTX3L knockdown, knockdown of either LIPG or ISG15 completely abolished the DTX3L overexpression-enhanced growth of MDA-MB-468 xenograft tumors and also significantly inhibited tumor development (Figure 8J). These in vitro and in vivo studies suggest that the DTX3L-LIPG-ISG15 signaling axis is pivotal for the development of basal-like TNBC.
In this study, we have identified that LIPG is aberrantly overexpressed in a subset of basal-like TNBCs. We have further demonstrated that LIPG is crucial for malignant characteristics of LIPG-expressing TNBC cells, including invasiveness, stemness, basal/EMT features, in vivo tumorigenicity and in vivo metastasis. Moreover, LIPG is required for maintaining basal/EMT and tumorigenic phenotypes of the basal-like TNBC line MCF10DCIS, which forms basal-like ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in vivo (Miller et al., 2000; Hu et al., 2008). Given that basal-like DCIS has been considered to be the precursor of invasive TNBC (Bryan et al., 2006; Thike et al., 2013), our studies suggest that LIPG may play an oncogenic role in the progression from basal-like DCIS to invasive TNBC.
Although it has been proposed that the phospholipase activity of LIPG and its function in importing lipid precursor species into cells are involved in promoting breast cancer cell proliferation (Slebe et al., 2016), the exact role of LIPG in breast cancer remains largely unknown. By studying the catalytically inactive mutant of LIPG, we for the first time have revealed that LIPG possess both lipase-dependent and lipase-independent functions in breast cancer cells. Our studies show that the lipase function of LIPG is implicated in supporting cell growth and promoting cell proliferation rate. In contrast, the lipase-independent function is required for LIPG to enhance invasiveness, stemness and basal/EMT features of breast cancer cells. This natural design of dual functional roles for LIPG is necessary as cell proliferation is not always coupled with the EMT and active in cancer stem cells. For example, TGFβ signaling has been known to activate the EMT and induce growth suppression in a parallel manner (Tsuji et al., 2008), and cancer stem cells can undergo dormancy during metastasis and chemoresistance (Elshamy and Duhé, 2013; Giancotti, 2013; Pinto et al., 2013; Sosa et al., 2014). Therefore, these two identified functional aspects of LIPG allow cancer cells to have more plasticity in regulating cell proliferation, stemness and EMT. It would be important in the future to reveal how cancer cells separately regulate enzymatic and non-enzymatic functions of LIPG during their tumorigenesis, metastasis and chemoresistance.
Mechanistically, we have found that LIPG executes its oncogenic function in basal-like TNBC cells through its involvement in the DTX3L-ISG15 pathway, known for mediating IFN signaling. This finding for the first time links the function of a lipase to a pathway relevant in immune response and cancer development. We have characterized the functional relationship between these three genes and defined the DTX3L-LIPG-ISG15 signaling axis in basal-like TNBC cells. Moreover, our novel finding indicates that DTX3L is required to sustain LIPG expression in basal-like TNBC cells mainly through its protection of LIPG from proteasome-mediated protein degradation. We do not yet understand how DTX3L executes this protective function to maintain LIPG protein levels in TNBC cells. However, it has been shown that DTX3L is involved in the immunoproteasome pathway to degrade viral 3C proteases (Zhang et al., 2015b). Therefore, there is a possibility that DTX3L protects LIPG protein levels via degrading some cellular proteases involved in LIPG protein degradation. Future study is necessary to address this possibility. From the study of a catalytically inactive LIPG mutant, we have revealed that the LIPG induces ISG15 expression in a non-enzymatic manner. This finding suggests that the non-enzymatic function of LIPG is implicated in the DTX3L-LIPG-ISG15 signaling pathway. Several cellular enzymes (e.g. histone H3 K36 demethylase KDM4A, caspase-8, and lysyl oxidase) have been reported to possess both enzymatic and non-enzymatic functions (Trackman, 2016; Colmenares et al., 2017; Henry and Martin, 2017). Most of these identified non-enzymatic functions are mediated by protein-protein interactions. These discoveries raise a possibility that the non-enzymatic function of LIPG is mediated by its interacting proteins. Due to the critical role of the DTX3L-LIPG-ISG15 axis in tumorigenicity of basal-like TNBC cells in vitro and in vivo and the essential role of LIPG in TNBC metastasis in vivo, future studies are needed to address several important questions raised by our findings. What remains unclear is how the non-enzymatic role of LIPG can be engaged in IFN signaling and regulate expression of ISGs, how the DTX3L-LIPG-ISG15 axis regulates the malignancies of basal-like TNBC and what other factors are involved, and what pathological mechanisms cause LIPG mRNA overexpression in basal-like TNBC.
To our surprise, LIPG overexpression in MCF7 cells increased expression of many ISGs related to type I and II IFN responses. This finding suggests that LIPG is involved in IFN signaling in breast cancer cells by enhancing expression of ISGs. It will be important in the future to reveal whether LIPG participates in IFN responses in immune cells and other cell types. It has been shown that LIPG expression can be induced by immune cytokines (e.g. IL-6), agonists (e.g. polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid (poly I:C) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS)) and transcription factors (e.g. NFκB) (Kempe et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2007; Yasuda et al., 2007; Badellino et al., 2008; Robert et al., 2013). However, the biological roles of LIPG in these immune responses remain unclear. Our studies have shown that DTX3L, a ubiquitin E3 ligase essential for IFN-stimulated expression of ISGs, is required for protecting LIPG protein from proteasome-mediated degradation in breast cancer cells. Given that IFNs can induce DTX3L expression (Juszczynski et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2015b), IFNs may enhance LIPG expression in cancer cells through their stimulating effects on DTX3L expression. This potential connection is relevant as IFN-β has been shown to be necessary and sufficient for increased tumorigenicity in a transformed mouse embryonic fibroblast line (Forys et al., 2014). Because this tumorigenic cell model has defects in both p53 and ARF, it is akin to TNBC, which frequently manifests co-inactivation of both tumor suppressor genes (Forys et al., 2014). Moreover, knockdown of STAT1, an important mediator of IFN signaling, impaired growth of TNBC cells (Forys et al., 2014). These findings suggest that IFN signaling may play a critical role in TNBC development. Although activation of the IFN signature is generally thought to be tumor-suppressive (Chan et al., 2012; Snell et al., 2017), our and other studies suggest that IFN-related signaling pathways function as double-edged swords in cancer (Forys et al., 2014; Snell et al., 2017). Our finding of DTX3L-dependent regulation of LIPG expression may have important implications to tumor-microenvironmental interactions occurring in TNBCs through secreted immune cytokines like IFNs.
Our finding that LIPG is preferentially overexpressed in basal-like TNBCs is inconsistent with the previous finding by Slebe et al., which shows that LIPG is generally overexpressed in all subtypes of breast cancer (Slebe et al., 2016). This discrepancy is likely due to variations in the use of the LIPG antibody, cell line models, breast cancer datasets, etc. The most obvious difference is that their antibody only detected cleaved 40 kDa LIPG (Slebe et al., 2016). Contrary to their result, our antibody detected both 68 kDa and 40 kDa LIPG proteins, consistent with other reported findings (Edmondson et al., 2009). Our studies showed that 68 kDa glycosylated LIPG is the predominant form in breast cancer cells. Our findings from studying LIPG protein expression in breast cancer tissues and cell lines are consistent with the results from in silico analyses of public breast cancer datasets from the Oncomine database.
In conclusion, our studies highlight the importance of the DTX3L-LIPG-ISG15 signaling pathway in the tumorigenesis and metastasis of basal-like TNBC and the potential to target this signaling axis for therapy of basal-like TNBC expressing LIPG. Moreover, these novel findings suggest a new view that a lipoprotein lipase can influence protein functionality in a non-enzymatic manner via its impact on expression of ISG15, a ubiquitin-like protein involved in regulating protein function and stability by ISGylation. We predict that the regulation of DTX3L-ISG15 signaling may be different between LIPG-proficient and LIPG-deficient cancer cells. Understanding of signaling alterations between these two scenarios would propel the identification of effective therapeutic targets for TNBC therapy.
We obtained breast cancer cell lines, including MDA-MB-231 (RRID:CVCL_0062), MDA-MB-468 (RRID:CVCL_0419), Hs578T (RRID:CVCL_0332), T47D (RRID:CVCL_0553) and MCF7 (RRID:CVCL_0031), from ATCC (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA). The human DCIS cell line MCF10DCIS.COM (MCF10DCIS) (RRID:CVCL_5552) was purchased from Asterand USA (Detroit, MI). These cell lines were cultured according to manufacturer's instructions. The identity of cell lines has been authenticated by ATCC and Asterand before we obtained them. We routinely perform mycoplasma contamination testing using the mycoplasma detection kit (ATCC) to ensure that cell lines used in studies are mycoplasma-free.
The adjacent normal and cancerous breast tissue samples from breast cancer patients (38 to 80 years old with a mean age of 51 ± 11 years) who underwent surgery during the year 2016 were provided by the Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital National Biobank of Korea, a member of the National Biobank of Korea, which is supported by the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Family Affairs. Subtype classification of invasive ductal carcinomas used in the study was based on their IHC staining results of ER, PR and HER2. All tissue samples were obtained with informed consent from patients under protocols approved by the institutional review board of the Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital. These obtained tissue specimens were utilized to generate tissue section slides and tissue microarrays for research purposes. The use of human tissue specimens in this study has been approved by the institutional review board of the Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital (Reference number: CNUHH-2016–153).
Total RNA of cultured cells was isolated using the Ambion TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Halethorpe, MD) and total RNA of paraffin-embedded breast tissues was isolated using the AllPrep DNA/RNA FFPE Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to manufactures' instructions. qRT-PCR analysis of mRNA expression was performed as described previously with normalization to GAPDH (Lo et al., 2016). The gene primers used in studies are listed as following:
LIPG: forward, 5'-TGGACTCAACGATGTCTTGG-3'
ISG15: forward, 5'-GCCATGGGCTGGGACCT-3'
KRT14: forward, 5'-CAGTCCCAGCTCAGCATGAA-3'
CDH1/E-cadherin: forward, 5'- GCCCTTGGAGCCGCAG-3'
CDH2/N-cadherin: forward, 5'-TATCCTTGTGCTGATGTTTGTGGT-3'
FOXC2: forward, 5'-CAGCAGCAAACTTTCCCCAAC-3'
SNAI1/SNAIL: forward, 5'-GCCTAGCGAGTGGTTCTTCTG-3'
SNAI2/SLUG: forward, 5'-ACTGGACACACATACAGTGATT-3'
reverse, 5'- ACTCACTCGCCCCAAAGATG-3'
TWIST1: forward, 5'-GCCGGAGACCTAGATGTCATT-3'
ZEB1: forward, 5'-GAGACATAAATATGAACACACAGGTAAAAGAC-3'
ZEB2: forward, 5'-CCACCAGTCCAGACCAGTATTCCT-3'
FN1/Fibronectin 1: forward, 5'-AGATACCATCAGAGAACAAACACTAA-3'
VIM/vimentin: forward, 5'-CGGGAGAAATTGCAGGAGGA-3'
IL6: forward, 5'-CAATCTGGATTCAATGAGGAGACTT-3'
SOX1: forward, 5'-AGTGTCGCTCCAATTCAAATTAGTG-3'
SOX2: forward, 5'-GCTTTTGTTCGATCCCAACTTTC-3'
SOX9: forward, 5'-TCAACGGCTCCAGCAAGAACAAG-3'
POU5F1/OCT4: forward, 5'-CGAAAGAGAAAGCGAACCAGTATC-3'
ABCG2: forward, 5'-TTTTCAGGTCTGTTGGTCAATCTCA-3'
PROCR: forward, 5'-CAGACACCAACACCACGATCA-3'
ALDH1: forward, 5'-ATGTCTGGAAATGGAAGAGAACTGG-3'
PROM1/CD133: forward, 5'-CACAGGGAATGGATTGTTGGA-3'
The immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis was performed using the avidin biotin peroxidase complex (ABC) method as previously described (Lo et al., 2017). The antibodies used in IHC experiments include anti-LIPG (Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom; catalog no. ab56493) (RRID:AB_943999), anti-DTX3L (Bethyl Laboratories, Inc, Montgomery, TX; catalog no. A300-833A) (RRID: AB_597865) and anti-vimentin (Proteintech, Rosemont, IL; catalog no. 10366–1-AP) (RRID:AB_2273020). Scoring of LIPG and DTX3L protein expression in human breast cancer tissue samples was scored independently by two individuals based on an H-score, which is derived by multiplying the staining intensity (0–3) with the percentage of tumor epithelial cells with positive IHC staining.
Protein expression of LIPG, ISG15 and DTX3L was examined by western blotting using a mouse antibody against LIPG (Abcam, ab56493) (RRID:AB_943999) and rabbit antibodies against ISG15 (Cell Signaling Technology, #2758 and #2743) (RRID:AB_2126200 and RRID:AB_2126201) and DTX3L (Bethyl Laboratories, Inc, A300-834A) (RRID: AB_2277461). Protein expression was detected by chemiluminescence (ECL, Pierce). Expression of α-tubulin (Thermo Fisher Scientific) (RRID:AB_2533035) was used as a protein loading control. Western blot data were quantified by densitometric analysis of autoradiograms, using a computerized densitometer (Typhoon System; Molecular Dynamics, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA). The quantitative protein level data were normalized by the α-tubulin protein levels.
The full-length of human LIPG cDNA fragments were amplified from the cDNA pool prepared from MCF10DCIS RNA. To generate lenti-CMV-LIPG, the LIPG cDNA was cloned into the lentiviral destination vector pSMPUW-CMV (Zhu et al., 2015) using the Gateway LR cloning kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to manufacturer's instructions. To generate a catalytically inactive mutant of LIPG, we introduced two nucleotide mutations into the LIPG gene cDNA within the pSMPUW-CMV vector for converting serine at the 149 aa of matured LIPG protein (lacking the N-terminal 20-aa signal peptide) to alanine (S149A) using a QuikChange Lightning Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA) according to manufacturer's instructions.
To produce lentiviruses, 1.2 μg of lenti-CMV-LIPG (or lenti-CMV-LIPGS149A), 1.2 μg of pCD/NL-BH*DDD (Addgene, Cambridge, MA; plasmid 17531) and 0.2 μg of pVSVG (Cell Biolabs, San Diego, CA) were co-transfected into HEK293T cells (RRID:CVCL_0063) using Lipofectamine 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in a six-well plate. The Lipofectamine 2000/DNA complex-containing medium was replaced with the fresh medium (DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 100 U/ml penicillin-streptomycin) 16 hr post-transfection. Cell medium containing the viral particles was collected twice at 24 and 48 hr after the medium change, passed through a 0.45 μm filter, and either used fresh or stored at 4°C for up to 1 week for cell infection.
To establish stable LIPG-overexpressing MCF7 and MDA-MB-468 cells, both cell lines were infected by exposure to the lentiviral supernatant (~4 MOI) and polybrene (0.8 μg/mL) (Millipore, Billerica, MA) daily for 2 days. 24 hr after the second lentiviral infection, infected cells were selected in the culture medium containing puromycin (0.8 μg/ml) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO).
To construct the human DTX3L expression plasmid, the full-length DTX3L gene cDNA fragments were amplified from the cDNA pool prepared from MCF10DCIS RNA. The DTX3L cDNA was cloned into the BamHI and XbaI sites of the expression vector pcDNA3.1. To establish the stable DTX3L-overexpressing MDA-MB-468 cell line, cells were transfected with pcDNA3.1-DTX3L using Lipofectamine 2000 and transfected cells were selected in the culture medium containing 1 mg/ml geneticin (G418) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO).
The shRNA sequences were cloned into pLV-hU6-Ef1a-puro vector (Biosettia, San Diego, CA) according to manufacturer's instructions. The scramble and four shRNA sequences used in the study are: scramble shRNA, 5'-TAACTCGCTCGAAGGAATC-3'; shLIPG-1, 5'-GCCTTTCAGAGTTTACCAT-3'; shLIPG-2, 5'-GCCGCAAGAACCGTTGTAA-3'; shISG15, 5'-GCAACGAATTCCAGGTGTC-3'; shDTX3L, 5'-GGCGAAGCAGTATGTTCTA-3'. The preparation of lentiviral shRNA particles and cell infection were processed as described above. To establish stable gene knockdown cell lines, infected MDA-MB-468 cells with or without DTX3L overexpression were selected in the culture medium containing puromycin (0.8 μg/ml).
The siRNA transfection was performed with 40 nM of siRNA using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to manufacturer’s instructions. siRNAs were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. The siRNA sequences used in the study are: siControl, 5'-UAACUCGCUCGAAGGAAUC-3' (Lo et al., 2016); siLIPG-1, 5'-GCCUUUCAGAGUUUACCAU-3' (Slebe et al., 2016); siLIPG-2, 5'-GCCGCAAGAACCGUUGUAA-3'; si-ISG15, 5'-GCAACGAAUUCCAGGUGUC-3' (Zhang et al., 2015a); siDTX3L-1, 5'-GGCGAAGCAGUAUGUUCUA-3' (Juszczynski et al., 2006); siDTX3L-2, 5'-GAGGUGGGUCCGAAAUAAU-3' (Bachmann et al., 2014).
Transwell-based migration and invasion assays were implemented as previously described (Lo et al., 2016).
We performed primary stem-cell sphere formation assays as previously described (Lo et al., 2016). For secondary sphere formation assays, formed primary spheres were collected and dissociated with accutase (BioLegend). Single primary sphere cells were subjected to sphere culture for secondary sphere formation in a same way as primary sphere formation assays. The criteria for secondary sphere counting are the same as those for primary sphere counting. When secondary sphere formation involves siRNA knockdown, primary sphere cells were cultured in the sphere culture medium containing siRNA-lipofectamine complexes for continuous gene knockdown.
Cells were stained with the following antibodies from Biolegend (San Diego, CA): allophycocyanin (APC)-conjugated anti-CD44 (RRID:AB_312963), phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated anti-CD24 (RRID:AB_314854) and APC-conjugated anti-EpCAM (RRID:AB_756081). FACS analysis of stained cells was performed using a FACSAria II cell sorter (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) as previously described (Lo et al., 2016).
The control MDA-MB-468 and its derived stable cell lines (1 × 106 or 5 × 106 cells in 50% Matrigel) were injected into the fourth mammary fat pads of 6 weeks old female athymic nude mice (n = 6 for each cell line). Athymic nude mice (NU/NU mice, Stock No: 002019) were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). The length and width of tumors were measured every four days with a caliper to calculate tumor volume using the formula: V = 1/2 (Length × Width2) (Jensen et al., 2008). At the endpoint, xenograft tumors were isolated and processed for IHC analysis. Xenograft tumor experiments were performed according to the animal protocol approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the University of Maryland School of Medicine, which is in accordance with the guidelines established by the USPHS.
For in vivo metastasis analysis of TNBC cells, we performed tail vein injection of 1 × 106 MDA-MB-468 cells expressing either scramble or LIPG shRNA into athymic nude mice. Four weeks after injection, experimental mice were euthanized and dissected for lung isolation. Isolated lung were fixed and embedded in paraffin for making tissue sections. Paraffin-embedded lung tissue sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE staining) for histological analysis of metastatic tumor foci. IHC analysis of vimentin protein expression in lung tumor foci was also performed using the anti-vimentin antibody (Proteintech, Rosemont, IL) to confirm metastasis of MDA-MB-468. The numbers of lung tumor foci were counted according to HE and IHC staining of lung tissue samples. In vivo metastasis experiments were performed according to the animal protocol approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the University of Maryland School of Medicine, which is in accordance with the guidelines established by the USPHS.
Parental control and LIPG-overexpressing MCF7 cells were lysed with 4% sodium deoxycholate. Lysates were washed, reduced, alkylated and trypsinolyzed in filter as described by Wisniewski et al. (Wiśniewski et al., 2009) and Erde et al. (Erde et al., 2014). Peptides were separated on a nanoACQUITY UPLC analytical column (BEH130 C18, 1.7 μm, 75 μm x 200 mm, Waters) over a 180 min linear acetonitrile gradient (3–43%) with 0.1% formic acid on a Waters nano-ACQUITY UPLC system, and analyzed on a coupled Waters Synapt G2S HDMS mass spectrometric system. Spectra were acquired using an ion mobility linked parallel mass spectrometry (UDMSe) and analyzed as described by Distler et al. (2014).
Peaks were resolved using Apex3D and Peptide3D algorithms (Geromanos et al., 2009). Tandem mass spectra were searched against a UniProt human reference proteome and its corresponding decoy sequences using an ion accounting algorithm (Li et al., 2009). Resulting hits were validated at a maximum false discovery rate of 0.04. Abundance ratios between the LIPG overexpressing cell line and the control cell line were measured by comparing the MS1 peak volumes of peptide ions at the low collision energy cycle, whose identities were confirmed by MS2 sequencing at the elevated collision energy cycle as described above. Label-free quantifications were performed using an aligned AMRT (Accurate Mass and Retention Time) cluster quantification algorithm developed by Qi et al. (2012).
Data are presented as mean ± S.D. Statistical analysis of general experimental datasets was performed by Student's t test. Statistical analysis of tumor growth curves was performed by two-way ANOVA. F-test was used to analyze variances between two gene expression datasets from the Oncomine database. Correlation between mRNA levels of two genes was analyzed by Pearson correlation test. The p values of <0.05 were considered significant. Data were analyzed using the GraphPad Prism software (version 6.0; GraphPad Software, Inc, La Jolla, CA) (RRID:SCR_002798).
Effects of nonlipolytic ligand function of endothelial lipase on high density lipoprotein metabolism in vivoJournal of Biological Chemistry 278:40688–40693.https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M304367200
Glycerophospholipid profile in oncogene-induced senescenceBiochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids 1821:1256–1268.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2011.11.008
Loss-of-function variants in endothelial lipase are a cause of elevated HDL cholesterol in humansJournal of Clinical Investigation 119:1042–1050.https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI37176
Enhanced FASP (eFASP) to increase proteome coverage and sample recovery for quantitative proteomic experimentsJournal of Proteome Research 13:1885–1895.https://doi.org/10.1021/pr4010019
The CD44+/CD24- phenotype is enriched in basal-like breast tumorsBreast Cancer Research 10:R53.https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr2108
Otto Warburg's contributions to current concepts of cancer metabolismNature Reviews Cancer 11:325–337.https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3038
Identification of human triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and preclinical models for selection of targeted therapiesJournal of Clinical Investigation 121:2750–2767.https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI45014
Tumor-associated myoepithelial cells promote the invasive progression of ductal carcinoma in situ through activation of TGFβ signalingJournal of Biological Chemistry 292:11466–11484.https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M117.775080
MCF10DCIS.com xenograft model of human comedo ductal carcinoma in situJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute 92:1185a.https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/92.14.1185a
Lipoprotein lipase and endothelial lipase in human testis and in germ cell neoplasmsInternational Journal of Andrology 33:e207–e215.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2009.00988.x
A software toolkit and interface for performing stable isotope labeling and top3 quantification using Progenesis LC-MSOMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology 16:489–495.https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2012.0042
Triple-negative breast cancer: distinguishing between basal and nonbasal subtypesClinical Cancer Research 15:2302–2310.https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2132
Interleukin 6 stimulates endothelial binding and transport of high-density lipoprotein through induction of endothelial lipaseArteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology 33:2699–2706.https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.113.301363
Type I interferon in chronic virus infection and cancerTrends in Immunology 38:542–557.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2017.05.005
Mechanisms of disseminated cancer cell dormancy: an awakening fieldNature Reviews Cancer 14:611–622.https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3793
Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysisNature Methods 6:359–362.https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1322
Endothelial lipase is increased by inflammation and promotes LDL uptake in macrophagesJournal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis 14:192–201.https://doi.org/10.5551/jat.E502
Ralph DeBerardinisReviewing Editor; UT Southwestern Medical Center, United States
In the interests of transparency, eLife includes the editorial decision letter and accompanying author responses. A lightly edited version of the letter sent to the authors after peer review is shown, indicating the most substantive concerns; minor comments are not usually included.
Thank you for submitting your article "The novel DTX3L-LIPG-ISG15 signaling axis promotes the development of basal-like triple-negative breast cancer" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been favorably evaluated by Charles Sawyers (Senior Editor) and three reviewers, one of whom, Ralph DeBerardinis (Reviewer #1), is a member of our Board of Reviewing Editors.
The reviewers have discussed the reviews with one another and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this decision to help you prepare a revised submission.
These authors studied the role of lipoprotein lipases in breast cancer and identify endothelial lipase (LIPG) as being over-expressed in basal-like triple negative breast cancers and cell lines. Many of the aggressive features of these cells, including proliferation, propensity to form spheroids, migration/invasion, expression of genes related to the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and tumor growth in mice, require LIPG expression. The authors use proteomics to demonstrate that many of the proteins induced though LIPG over-expression are interferon-stimulating genes. One of these, ISG15, is then shown to execute many of LIPG's effects on the basal-like phenotype. The authors also show that LIPG levels are regulated by DTX3L via effects on protein stability. Over-expressing DTX3L is sufficient to drive an EMT-like phenotype and promote tumor growth in vivo, but these effects are reversed by silencing LIPG or ISG15. The authors conclude that the DTX3L-LIPG-ISG15 signaling axis confers key aspects of the basal-like TNBC phenotype and promotes tumor growth.
1) The authors should do more to strengthen the mechanistic link between LIPG and its downstream targets, particularly ISG15. This is important because the rationale for studying lipase function in TNBC in the first place was somewhat non-intuitive. Although this would not fully explain the mechanistic basis of LIPG's role in the reported pathway, one basic and essential question is whether the catalytic activity of LIPG (i.e. its metabolic function) is relevant for the regulation of ISG15. To answer this question, the authors could overexpress an allele of LIPG with a point mutation disrupting its lipase activity in MCF7 cells, then examine whether this mutant confers the same changes in gene expression, migration, etc. observed with wild-type LIPG.
2) Figure 1E needs to include a larger panel of cell lines to better validate the conclusions about the importance of LIPG in the basal subset. For example, the panel currently only includes two cell lines with the luminal phenotype, and this is inadequate to draw any conclusions.
3) The role of the DTX3L-LIPG-ISG15 signaling pathway in stem cell and EMT phenotypes should be supported by additional evidence. For stem cell properties, the authors should assess the effect of silencing multiple components of the pathway on secondary sphere formation, which should more robustly test stem-like properties. EMT should be assessed through a more thorough evaluation of morphological changes and immunostaining/immunofluorescence of classical EMT markers like vimentin and E-cadherin.
4) As metastasis is an essential feature of TNBC aggressiveness, it would strengthen the paper considerably if LIPG silencing reduced MDA-MB-468 metastasis in vivo.https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.31334.042
- Weiliang Huang
- Maureen A Kane
- Qun Zhou
- Qun Zhou
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
We thank Yan-Jen Lo for technical assistance with in silico data analysis, Justine E Yu and Benjamin Wolfson for assistance with manuscript editing. This work was supported, in whole or in part, by the NIH CA157779A1 and CA163820A1 to Q Zhou, and the University of Maryland Baltimore, School of Pharmacy Mass Spectrometry Center (SOP1841-IQB2014) to W Huang and MA Kane.
Human subjects: Breast cancer tissue samples from breast cancer patients were provided by the Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital National Biobank of Korea, a member of the National Biobank of Republic of Korea, which is supported by the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Family Affairs. All tissue samples were obtained with informed consent from patients under protocols approved by the institutional review board of the Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital. The use of human tissue specimens in this study has been approved by the institutional review board of the Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital (Reference number: CNUHH-2016-153). The institutional approval is not required for publication of data from these human specimens due to institutional policies of the Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital.
Animal experimentation: This animal study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#0116028) of the University of Maryland School of Medicine.
- Ralph DeBerardinis, Reviewing Editor, UT Southwestern Medical Center, United States
© 2018, Lo et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.