Single-color, ratiometric biosensors for detecting signaling activities in live cells

  1. Brian L Ross
  2. Brian Tenner
  3. Michele L Markwardt
  4. Adam Zviman
  5. Guoli Shi
  6. Jaclyn P Kerr
  7. Nicole E Snell
  8. Jennifer J McFarland
  9. Joseph R Mauban
  10. Christopher W Ward
  11. Megan A Rizzo  Is a corresponding author
  12. Jin Zhang  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of California, San Diego, United States
  2. Johns Hopkins University, United States
  3. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, United States
  4. University of Maryland Baltimore, United States

Abstract

Genetically encoded fluorescent biosensors have revolutionized the study of signal transduction by enabling the real-time tracking of signaling activities in live cells. Investigating the interaction between signaling networks has become increasingly important to understanding complex cellular phenomena, necessitating an update of the biosensor toolkit to allow monitoring and perturbing multiple activities simultaneously in the same cell. We therefore developed a new class of fluorescent biosensors based on homo-FRET, deemed FLuorescence Anisotropy REporters (FLAREs), which combine the multiplexing ability of single-color sensors with a quantitative, ratiometric readout. Using an array of color variants, we were able to demonstrate multiplexed imaging of three activity reporters simultaneously in the same cell. We further demonstrate the compatibility of FLAREs for use with optogenetic tools as well as intravital two-photon imaging.

Introduction

Genetically encoded biosensors have revolutionized the study of cell signaling by allowing the real-time monitoring of signaling activities, such as enzymatic activity or the release of second messengers, in live cells. They are therefore critical tools for uncovering the precise spatial and temporal regulation of signal transduction cascades. These biosensors can be divided into two broad classes: single-color and ratiometric. Single-color sensors, with an intensiometric activity readout, only occupy a single-color channel, allowing for more flexibility in multiplexed imaging experiments. However, they are sensitive to variations in probe concentration caused by changing expression levels or cell shape, as well as differences in imaging conditions, such as illumination intensity and focus. On the other hand, sensors with a ratiometric readout, such as those based on Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET), cancel out many of these variations, enabling quantitative measurements of second messenger concentrations and better comparisons between experiments. However, the requirement for two distinct color channels limits their application in multiplexed imaging.

We therefore aimed to develop sensors that only occupy a single channel while still cancelling out the effects of varying imaging conditions and probe concentrations. Hence, rather than using the emission ratio between the FRET and donor channels, we instead used the loss of polarization of emitted light as a readout for FRET between two fluorescent proteins (FPs). Because this approach does not require the donor and acceptor to have distinct emission wavelengths, it can be used for either hetero-FRET (e.g. between different chromophores) or homo-FRET (e.g. between identical chromophores). Homo-FRET measurements have been useful for detecting protein clustering and protein oligomerization in live cells (Bader et al., 2011, Bader et al., 2009; Gautier et al., 2001), but only recently has the possibility of using homo-FRET in biosensor designs been explored (Warren et al., 2015; Cameron et al., 2016). Here, we describe the development of a panel of single-color, genetically encodable biosensors based on homo-FRET for detecting kinase activity and second messenger dynamics. We call these sensors FLuorescence Anisotropy REporters, or FLAREs.

Results and discussion

To create our FLARE probes, we adapted existing FRET-based biosensors for homo-FRET measurements by replacing the traditional FRET pair with two FPs of the same color. The resulting biosensors include a molecular switch, which changes conformation in the presence of a particular biochemical activity, flanked by two spectrally similar FPs at the N- and C-termini. Changes in the conformation of the molecular switch, and thus the biochemical activities under study, are then monitored by observing the fluorescence anisotropy of the sensor using fluorescence polarization microscopy, with increased anisotropy corresponding to a lower-FRET state of the sensor, similar to the effect of increasing the intramolecular distance between the FRET pair (Figure 1—figure supplement 1).

To develop a Protein Kinase A (PKA) activity FLARE, the molecular switch from A Kinase Activity Reporter 4 (AKAR4) (Zhang et al., 2001; Depry et al., 2011), composed of an FHA1 domain and PKA substrate (Figure 1a), was flanked between two FPs of the same color. The FHA1 domain binds to the PKA substrate when the latter is phosphorylated, altering the conformation of the molecular switch and leading to a change in FRET between the flanking homo-FRET pair. To test the effect of FP circular permutation on these biosensors, we developed two FLARE-AKAR variants based on the yellow FP mVenus: one in which the C-terminal FP was circularly permuted at position 172 (cp172Venus), consistent with the hetero-FRET AKAR4 sensor, and one without circular permutation. We expressed mVenus-cp172Venus FLARE-AKAR in HEK293T cells and captured a time-course using fluorescence polarization microscopy. Following PKA activation using a cocktail of 50 μM forskolin (Fsk), an adenylyl cyclase activator, and 100 μM 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX), a general phosphodiesterase inhibitor, the anisotropy decreased from 0.29 ± 0.003 to 0.26 ± 0.003, a decrease of 0.028 ± 0.001 (N = 44, biological replicates, unpaired, two-tailed t-test, p<0.0001), with the kinetics of the decrease matching those observed with AKAR4 (Figure 1b, Figure 1—figure supplement 2a). The yellow variant without the circular-permutation in the C-terminal FP showed slightly reduced changes in anisotropy upon stimulation with Fsk/IBMX (Figure 1c, Figure 1—figure supplement 2c), consistent with previous

Figure 1 with 8 supplements see all
Design and characterization of FLARE AKAR.

(a) Schematic of a kinase activity FLARE (b) Diagram illustrating domain structure of FLARE-AKAR (top). Time-course of mean fluorescence anisotropy of Venus-cp172Venus FLARE-AKAR wild type (blue, N = 44) and kinase insensitive T-to-A mutant (red, N = 38) expressed in HEK293T cell, stimulated with 50 μM forskolin and 100 μM IBMX at t = 0 min, and 20 μM H-89 at t = 24 min (left). Dashed lines above and below represent standard error of the mean. Changes in anisotropy upon Fsk/IBMX stimulation for both FLARE-AKAR WT and T-to-A mutant (upper right, two-tailed t-test, p<0.0001), calculated as the difference between the mean anisotropy from t = 5 min to t = 7.5 min and the mean anisotropy of the baseline before drug addition. The mean for each is shown, with the error reflecting the standard error of the mean. Representative anisotropy pseudocolor image before Fsk/IBMX stimulation (t = 0 min), after Fsk/IBMX stimulation (t = 7.5 min), and after inhibition of PKA with H-89 (t = 24 min) (lower right) (c) Comparison of the magnitude of the anisotropy change for different color variants of FLARE-AKAR upon stimulation with Fsk/IBMX including Venus-cp172Venus AKAR (N = 44), Venus-Venus FLARE AKAR (N = 32), EGFP-EGFP FLARE AKAR (N = 13), mCh-mCh FLARE AKAR (N = 22), mCerulean3 FLARE-AKAR (N = 10), and mCerulean3-cp173Cerulean FLARE-AKAR (N = 26). The mean for each is shown, with the error reflecting the standard error of the mean.

Figure 1—source data 1

FLARE AKAR characterization.

(a) Sheet 1, Figure 1b Time Course. Time course for mVenus-cp17Venus FLARE AKAR, wild type and kinase-inactive threonine-alanine (TA) mutant. (b) Sheet 2, Figure 1b Summary: Comparison of magnitude of responses for individual cells for Venus-cp172Venus FLARE AKAR, wild type and kinase-inactive threonine-alanine (TA) mutant, as well as statistics comparing the two groups. (c) Sheet 3, Figure 1c. Summary of magnitude of responses for various color variants of FLARE AKAR after stimulation with forskolin and IBMX.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/35458/elife-35458-fig1-data1-v3.xlsx

observations in hetero-FRET-based biosensors (Nagai et al., 2004; DiPilato and Zhang, 2009; Allen and Zhang, 2006). We observed a slight positive correlation between intensity and anisotropy change for Venus-cp172Venus FLARE AKAR; however, the expression level does not significantly impact the reporting ability of these sensors in general (Figure 1—figure supplement 3a). The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of Venus-cp172Venus FLARE-AKAR was calculated to be 32 by dividing the magnitude of the anisotropy change upon maximal PKA stimulation by the standard deviation of the baseline before stimulation.

Subsequent control experiments confirmed that this change in anisotropy is caused by a change in the FRET state due to the conformational change of the sensor upon stimulation of PKA activity. PKA inhibition using 20 μM H-89 led to an immediate slope change and increase in anisotropy (Figure 1b). On the other hand, a mutant version of the biosensor with a threonine-to-alanine (T-to-A) mutation at the phosphorylation site showed no change in anisotropy upon PKA stimulation with Fsk/IBMX or inhibition with H-89 (Figure 1b, Figure 1—figure supplement 2b), suggesting that the observed changes in anisotropy were due to phosphorylation of the PKA substrate. Furthermore, isoproterenol, a β-adrenergic agonist, induced FLARE-AKAR responses in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 1—figure supplement 4). To further demonstrate that the change in anisotropy upon PKA stimulation was due to a change in FRET, we mutated the chromophore of the C-terminal cp172Venus in Venus-cp172Venus FLARE AKAR from GYG to GGG. We observed that the magnitude of the response to Fsk/IBMX decreased to approximately one-third of that of the wild-type sensor (Figure 1—figure supplement 5). The remaining response was likely due to intermolecular FRET that occurs when the FHA1 domain of one molecule binds to the phosphorylated PKA substrate in an adjacent molecule.

In addition to the yellow sensors, we developed a panel of color variants of FLARE-AKAR, including EGFP-EGFP, mCherry-mCherry, mCerulean3-mCerulean3 (Markwardt et al., 2011), and mCerulean3-cp173Cerulean3 versions. All these variants exhibited a decrease in anisotropy in cells treated with Fsk/IBMX; however, the magnitude of the anisotropy decrease depended on the choice of FP, with the mVenus-cp172Venus variant having the largest response (Figure 1c, Figure 1—figure supplement 2). As with the Venus variants, the Cerulean3-based FLARE-AKAR showed an increased dynamic range with a circularly permutated fluorescent protein at the C-terminal position. mCherry-mCherry FLARE-AKAR, being spectrally shifted from the AKAR4 heteroFRET sensor allowed for direct comparison of FLARE and heteroFRET sensors within the same cell. As shown in Figure 1—figure supplement 6, changes in anisotropy in mCherry-mCherry FLARE-AKAR corresponded with the changes in normalized emission ratio in AKAR4, with similar kinetics.

We furthermore demonstrated the ability of FLARE-AKAR sensors to monitor kinase activity at particular subcellular compartments. By fusing Venus-cp172Venus FLARE-AKAR to targeting motifs from Lyn kinase and DAKAP1, we were able to detect PKA activity at the plasma membrane and outer mitochondrial membrane, respectively (Figure 1—figure supplement 7). Moreover, we used untargeted FLARE sensors to detect differential PKA activity dynamics in different compartments; diffusable Venus-cp172Venus FLARE AKAR in HeLa showed that PKA activity has slower kinetics and a lower magnitude in the nucleus than the cytosol (Figure 1—figure supplement 8).

To demonstrate the generalizability of FLAREs, we developed a family of single-color kinase activity or activation reporters in various colors (Figure 2). To construct a single-color Erk activity biosensor, we replaced the PKA sensor domain from Venus-cp172Venus FLARE-AKAR with the sensor domain from EKAR-EV, composed of a WW domain (PAABD), a flexible EV linker, and an Erk substrate peptide (Figure 2a) (Harvey et al., 2008; Vandame et al., 2014). When expressed in HEK293T cells, Venus-cp172Venus FLARE-EKAR-EV exhibited a decrease in anisotropy of 0.02 ± 0.001 (N = 13) after treatment with 100 ng/mL epidermal growth factor (EGF) to activate the MAPK pathway (Figure 2a, Figure 2—figure supplement 1). This response was reversed upon MEK inhibition using 20 μM U0126, and no change in anisotropy was observed with a T-to-A mutant sensor. Likewise, we developed a panel of PKC activity reporters, called FLARE-CKARs, by flanking a PKC sensor domain composed of an FHA1 domain and a PKC substrate (Herbst et al., 2011) from a CKAR2 construct (Figure 2—figure supplement 2) with mVenus-cp172Venus. We observed an anisotropy decrease of 0.02 ± 0.001 (N = 26) upon activation of PKC with 100 ng/mL phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) (Figure 2b, Figure 2—figure supplement 3). For both FLARE-EKAR (Figure 2—figure supplement 1) and FLARE CKAR (Figure 2—figure supplement 3), we likewise repeated this process for various color variants, and like the FLARE-AKARs, the sensors based on mVenus exhibited the largest responses. Furthermore, a myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) sensor was converted to a FLARE by exchanging the cyan FP for mVenus (Isotani et al., 2004). Calmodulin (CaM) association with the MLCK-CaM binding domain in between the FPs decreases FRET, leading to an increase in fluorescence anisotropy upon forced calcium (Ca2+) entry with 30 mM KCl (N = 13) (Figure 2c, Figure 2—figure supplement 4).

Figure 2 with 4 supplements see all
A panel of kinase activity and activation biosensors.

(a) Domain structure of FLARE-EKAR-EV (above). Time-course of mean fluorescence anisotropy of Venus-cp172Venus FLARE-EKAR-EV WT (blue, N = 13) and kinase-insensitive mutant (red, N = 16) expressed in HEK293T cell, with addition of 100 ng/mL EGF at t = 0 min and 20 μM U0126 at t = 25 min (left). Summary of anisotropy changes (upper right, two-tailed t-test, p<0.0001), calculated as the difference between the mean anisotropy from t = 10 min to t = 15 min and the mean anisotropy of the baseline before drug addition. The mean is shown, with the error reflecting the standard error of the mean. Representative anisotropy pseudocolor image before EGF stimulation (t = 0 min), after EGF stimulation (t = 25 min), and after inhibition of MEK with U0126 (t = 47.5 min) (lower right). (b) Domain structure of FLARE-CKAR (above). Time-course of fluorescence anisotropy of Venus-cp172Venus FLARE-CKAR WT (blue, N = 26) and kinase-insensitive mutant (red, N = 119) with addition of 100 ng/mL phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) at t = 0 min. Summary of response magnitudes (upper right, two-tailed t-test, p<0.0001), calculated as the difference between the mean anisotropy from t = 10 to t = 11.33 min and the mean anisotropy of the baseline before drug addition. The mean is shown, with the error reflecting the standard error of the mean. Representative anisotropy pseudocolor image before PMA addition (t = 0 min) and after PMA addition (t = 15 min). (c) Domain structure of FLARE-MLCK (top). Anisotropy time course of a representative REF52 cell expressing YFP-Venus FLARE-MLCK treated with 30 mM KCl at t = 0 (N = 13, blue), or vehicle control (N = 10). Summary of anisotropy changes, calculated as the mean difference between the anisotropy at t = 0.333 min and the anisotropy of the baseline, before KCl addition (upper right, two-tailed t-test, p<0.0001). Representative pseudocolor anisotropy images before and after KCl treatment (lower right). Dashed lines above and below time course traces reflect the standard error of the mean. FP, fluorescent protein; CaM BD, MLCK calmodulin-binding domain.

Figure 2—source data 1

FLARE kinase biosensor panel.

(a) Sheet 1, Figure 2a. Time course for Venus-cp172Venus FLARE EKAR, both wild type and kinase-inactive (TA) mutant. (b) Sheet 2, Figure 2a. Comparison of magnitudes of anisotropy changes for Venus-cp172Venus FLARE EKAR, both wild type and kinase-inactive (TA) mutant, of upon EGF addition, and relevant statistical tests to compare the two variants. (c) Sheet 3, Figure 2—figure supplement 1c. Changes of magnitudes of anisotropy change for various FLARE EKAR variants upon EGF addition. (d) Sheet 4, Figure 2b. Time course for Venus-cp172Venus FLARE CKAR, both wild type and kinase-inactive (TA) mutant. (e) Sheet 5, Figure 2b. Comparison of magnitudes of anisotropy changes for Venus-cp172Venus FLARE EKAR, both wild type and kinase-inactive (TA) mutant, of upon EGF addition, and relevant statistical tests to compare the two variants. (f) Sheet 6, Figure 2—figure supplement 2. Time courses for CKAR1 and CKAR2. (g) Sheet 7, Figure 2—figure supplement 3c. Changes of magnitudes of anisotropy change for various FLARE CKAR variants upon PMA addition. (h) Sheet 8, Figure 2c. Time course for FLARE MLCK, with either addition of KCl and vehicle only control. (i) Sheet 9, Figure 2c. Summary for magnitude of responses for FLARE MLCK.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/35458/elife-35458-fig2-data1-v3.xlsx

In addition to biosensors for monitoring enzymes, we also developed FLAREs for monitoring second messenger dynamics (Figure 3a). We developed a Ca2+ FLARE by utilizing the sensor domain from the Cameleon family of biosensors, composed of CaM and the Ca2+/CaM-binding peptide M13 (Nagai et al., 2004Miyawaki et al., 1999). When expressed in HEK293T cells, Venus-cp172Venus FLARE-Cameleon exhibited a decrease in anisotropy of 0.03 ± 0.002 (N = 10) upon addition of 1 μM ionomycin and 5 mM CaCl2, with the Venus-Venus, mCerulean3-mCerulean3, and mCherry-mCherry versions also showing detectable responses (Figure 3b, Figure 3—figure supplement 1a,b). The mVenus-based FLARE sensors tend to show larger dynamic ranges for a variety of

Figure 3 with 4 supplements see all
Design and characterization of FLARE second messenger biosensors.

(a) Schematic of FLARE ICUE cAMP biosensor. (b) Domain structure of FLARE-Cameleon (top). Time-course of mean fluorescence anisotropy of Venus-cp172Venus FLARE-Cameleon (N = 10) with addition of 1 μM ionomycin and 5 mM CaCl2. Summary of anisotropy changes after 1 μM ionomycin and 5 mM CaCl2 (upper right) calculated as the difference between the mean anisotropy from t = 5 min to t = 7.5 min and the anisotropy of the baseline before drug addition Representative anisotropy pseudocolor image before and after 1 μM ionomycin and 5 mM CaCl2 addition. (c) Domain structure of the cAMP biosensor FLARE-ICUE (top). Time-course of mean fluorescence anisotropy of Venus-cp172Venus FLARE-ICUE (N = 40) with addition of 50 μM forskolin and 100 μM IBMX at t = 0 (left). Summary of anisotropy changes after 50 μM forskolin and 100 μM IBMX with respect to baseline (upper right), calculated as the difference between the mean anisotropy from t = 5 min to t = 7.5 min and the anisotropy of the baseline before drug addition. Representative anisotropy pseudocolor image before (t = 0 min) and after (t = 7.5) stimulation with Fsk/IBMX (lower right). Dashed lines above and below time course reflect standard error of the mean.

Figure 3—source data 1

FLARE second messenger biosensor panel.

(a) Sheet 1, Figure 3b. Time course for Venus-cp172Venus FLARE Cameleon. (b) Sheet 2, Figure 3b. Summary of magnitude of responses for Venus-cp172Venus FLARE Cameleon upon addition of calcium chloride and ionomycin. (c) Sheet 3, Figure 3—figure supplement 1b. Summary of magnitudes of responses for various FLARE Cameleon variants upon addition of calcium chloride and ionomycin. (d) Sheet 4, Figure 3—figure supplement 2. In vitro calibration of Venus-cp172Venus FLARE Cameleon, both raw data and sigmoidal curve fits. (e) Sheet 5, Figure 3—figure supplement 3. Summary of magnitude of anisotropy changes for CFP FLARE D1ER upon addition of ionomycin and three different doses of calcium. (f) Sheet 6, Figure 3c. Time course for Venus-cp172Venus FLARE ICUE. (g) Sheet 7, Figure 3c Summary of magnitudes of changes in anisotropy for Venus-cp172Venus FLARE ICUE upon addition of forskolin and IBMX.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/35458/elife-35458-fig3-data1-v3.xlsx

 FLARE sensors than mCerulean3 or mCherry variants, likely due to the superior extinction coefficient and quantum yield of mVenus, which make it a good FRET donor and acceptor. We further demonstrated the ability of Venus-cp172Venus FLARE Cameleon to detect submaximal responses by monitoring calcium transients in histamine-stimulated HeLa cells (Figure 3—figure supplement 1c). In order to determine the dissociation constant and Hill coefficients, we purified Venus-cp172Venus Cameleon and measured the fluorescence anisotropy in solutions of known free Ca2+ concentration at different temperatures (Figure 3—figure supplement 2). The resulting parameters are in good agreement with other Cameleon sensors (Nagai et al., 2004). Furthermore, we developed another calcium FLARE sensor, based on D1-ER (Palmer et al., 2004), with a sensitivity appropriate for calcium monitoring in the ER. The anisotropy decreases upon increasing calcium concentration and increases when calcium is depleted from the ER upon treatment with thapsigargin (Figure 3—figure supplement 3). In addition to Ca2+, we developed a FLARE to detect intracellular cAMP based on the ICUE family of sensors, in which a conformational change in a truncated form of the cAMP effector Epac leads to a decrease in FRET efficiency in the presence of cAMP (DiPilato and Zhang, 2009) (Figure 3a). When expressed in HEK293T cells, the fluorescence anisotropy of Venus-cp172Venus FLARE-ICUE increased by 0.02 ± 0.001 (N = 40) upon stimulation with Fsk/IBMX (Figure 3c, Figure 3—figure supplement 4).

The fact that FLAREs only occupy a single-color channel and are highly generalizable for different biosensors, as well as color variants, highlights their utility for multiplexed imaging applications. While multiplexing of hetero-FRET sensors is generally limited to two probes (Depry et al., 2013; Shcherbakova et al., 2012), we demonstrate that FLAREs can facilitate co-imaging of three biosensors simultaneously. We co-expressed mCherry-mCherry FLARE-AKAR, Venus-cpVenus FLARE-EKAR-EV, and mCerulean3-mCerulean3 FLARE-Cameleon in HEK293T cells and acquired a time-course with sequential treatment using Fsk/IBMX, EGF, and thapsigargin. Clear and distinct decreases in anisotropy were observed in the red channel after Fsk/IBMX treatment, in the yellow channel after EGF stimulation, and in the cyan channel after thapsigargin treatment, corresponding to an increase in PKA activity, Erk activity, and intracellular Ca2+, respectively (N = 17) (Figure 4a, Figure 4—figure supplement 1).

Figure 4 with 5 supplements see all
Multiparameter Imaging with FLAREs.

(a) Time-course of a representative HEK293T cell co-expressing mCherry-mCherry FLARE-AKAR, mVenus-cp172Venus FLARE-EKAR-EV, and mCerulean3-mCerulean3 FLARE-Cameleon, with 50 μM forskolin and 100 μM IBMX added at t = 0 min, 100 ng/mL EGF at t = 7.5 min, and 1 μM thapsigargin added at t = 32.5 min (N = 17). (b) Anisotropy response of a representative MIN6 cell co-expressing Cerulean3-Cerulean3 FLARE-Cameleon and Venus-cp172Venus FLARE-ICUE, showing robust oscillations after stimulation with TEA at t = 0 min (N = 19). (c) Venus-cp172Venus FLARE-Cameleon anisotropy time-course in REF52 cells co-expressing the sensor and either mCherry-tagged humanized channel rhodopsin2 (blue-curve) or mCherry alone (red-curve), with periodic illumination with 455 nm light (indicated by cyan shading). (d) Purified mVenus and mCherry proteins were placed in separate capillary tubes and imaged with 855 nm and 1200 nm two-photon excitation. Plasmids encoding Venus-cp172Venus FLARE-Cameleon and mCherry-mCherry FLARE-AKAR were electroporated into the skeletal muscle of the foot of a live mouse for in vivo imaging. Below are Z-stack projections of skeletal muscle co-expressing these two sensors, excited with 855 nm (left) and 1200 nm (right) light. (e) Electrical stimulation decreased fluorescence anisotropy in the 855 nm channel, consistent with increased cytoplasmic Ca2+ (left) (two-tailed T-test, p=0.0037). Intraperitoneal injection of isoproterenol activates mCherry-mCherry FLARE AKAR (two-tailed T-test, p=0.0239), as indicated by decreased anisotropy in the 1200 nm channel (right). The mean for each is shown, with the error reflecting the standard error of the mean.

Figure 4—source data 1

Multiparameter imaging of FLAREs.

(a) Sheet 1, Figure 4a. Time course for multiplexed imaging of mCherry-mCherry FLARE AKAR, Venus-cp172Venus FLARE EKAR, and mCer3-mCer3 FLARE Cameleon, expressed in HEK293T cells and treated with forskolin and IBMX, EGF, and thapsigargin at t = 0 min, t = 7.5 min, and t = 32.5 min, respectively. (b) Sheet 2, Figure 4b. Time course for Venus-cp172Venus FLARE ICUE and mCer3-mCer3 FLARE Cameleon in Min6 cells, treated with TEA at t = 0 min. (c) Sheet 3, Figure 4c. Time course for Venus-cp172Venus FLARE Cameleon co-expressed with mCherry tagged hChR2-ER or mCherry alone. (d) Sheet 4, Figure 4e. Summary data of 2-photon in vivo imaging of Venus-cp172Venus FLARE Cameleon and mCherry-mCherry FLARE AKAR, in the muscle cells in the feet of live mice.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/35458/elife-35458-fig4-data1-v3.xlsx

We further aimed to show that FLARE sensors can be used to monitor multiple signaling activities simultaneously in different cellular contexts. For example, mCer3-mCer3 FLARE Cameleon, co-imaged with other FLARE sensors in HeLa cells, can detect calcium responses to physiologically relevant stimulation conditions, such as histamine (Figure 4—figure supplement 2). Additionally, when mCer3-mCer3 FLARE AKAR was co-imaged with Venus-cp172Venus cameleon in HEK293T cells, activation of the β-adrenergic with isoproterenol led to a transient decrease in anisotropy in the cyan-channel (Figure 4—figure supplement 3). Furthermore, we used FLAREs to study the cAMP-Ca2+ oscillatory circuit in pancreatic β-cells. MIN6 β-cells were transiently transfected with Venus-cp172Venus FLARE-ICUE and mCerulean3-mCerulean3 FLARE-Cameleon to simultaneously monitor cAMP and Ca2+ dynamics, respectively (N = 19). We observed clear fluorescence anisotropy oscillations in both channels following stimulation with 20 mM tetraethylammonium chloride (TEA) (Figure 4b, Figure 4—figure supplement 4). Ca2+ and cAMP exhibit synchronized oscillations, with Ca2+ increases corresponding to cAMP decreases, consistent with previous findings (Landa et al., 2005; Ni et al., 2011). These data demonstrate that even the lower signal mCerulean3-based FLARE sensors can be used under sub-maximal and physiologically relevant stimulation conditions in multiplexed imaging experiments.

In addition to multiplexed biosensor imaging, the fact that FLARE sensors occupy only a single color channel also permits simultaneously perturbing and monitoring biochemical activities using optogenetics and FLAREs, respectively. We coexpressed an mCherry-tagged,

ER-targeted channelrhodopsin2 (hChR2) (Nagel et al., 2003; Lin et al., 2009; Markwardt et al., 2016), a light-gated calcium ion channel, with Venus-cp172 FLARE-Cameleon in REF52 cells, a rat embryonic fibroblast cell line. Illumination with blue light produced an immediate decrease in anisotropy, corresponding to an increase in intracellular Ca2+ (Figure 4c, Figure 4—figure supplement 5). Control cells lacking hChR2 expression showed no change in anisotropy in the yellow channel.

In vivo, two-photon imaging of FLAREs was tested using a skeletal muscle preparation (Figure 4d,e). Exclusive excitation of mVenus (855 nm) or mCherry (1200 nm) was verified by imaging capillary tubes filled with recombinant proteins (Figure 4d). Plasmids encoding Venus-cp172Venus FLARE-Cameleon and mCherry FLARE-AKAR sensors were electroporated into the flexor digitorum brevis muscle of a live mouse (DiFranco et al., 2009; Kerr et al., 2015). Administration of an electrical current stimulated a rise in intracellular Ca2+ concentration, as indicated by a decrease in FLARE-Cameleon anisotropy, independent of changes in FLARE-AKAR anisotropy (Figure 4e). Activation of AKAR was then induced by intraperitoneal injection of isoproterenol (0.5 mg/kg). Thus, FLAREs enable in vivo multiparametric biosensor measurements.

We have demonstrated that FLAREs are a highly generalizable, accessible platform for creating single-color sensors to detect biochemical activities in individual cells in real time. Their ratiometric readout allows for fluctuations in light intensity and probe concentration to be cancelled out, permitting quantitative measurements of intracellular concentrations. We showed that these sensors have an SNR of 3–32 (Table 1) and a dynamic range comparable with first-generation FRET sensors (Newman and Zhang, 2008; Zhou et al., 2015). Future development and optimization should further enhance their performance. We demonstrated that current FLAREs are already useful for multiplexed imaging applications. They can also be used in conjunction with optogenetic tools to enable all-optical interrogation of cellular regulation, and for intravital two-photon imaging to facilitate studies in tissues and living animals. FLAREs, by allowing researchers to monitor multiple activities within the same cell, as well as to both monitor and optogenetically perturb activities in the same cell, could be used to study the how the spatiotemporal regulation of biochemical activities in highly integrated pathways allows a small number of signals to produce diverse cellular behaviors.

Table 1
Signal to noise ratios for FLARE biosensors.
SensorSignal to noise ratio (± SEM)
Venus-cp172Venus FLARE AKAR32 ± 2.0 (N = 32)
mVenus-mVenus FLARE AKAR10 ± 1.6 (N = 32)
EGFP-EGFP FLARE AKAR6 ± 0.6 (N = 32)
mCherry-mCherry FLARE AKAR14 ± 1.5 (N = 22)
mCerulean3-mCerulean3 FLARE AKAR± 0.5 (N = 10)
mCerulean3-cp173 Cerulean3 FLARE AKAR5 ± 0.3 (N = 26)
Venus-cp172Venus FLARE EKAR17 ± 3.1 (N = 8)
mCherry-mCherry FLARE EKAR4 ± 0.8 (N = 10)
mCerulean3-mCerulean3 FLARE EKAR9 ± 2.3 (N = 9)
Venus-cp172Venus FLARE CKAR27 ± 3.3 (N = 26)
mCherry-mCherry FLARE CKAR14 ± 3.0 (N = 8)
mCerulean3-mCerulean3 FLARE CKAR9 ± 1.7 (N = 6)
FLARE-MLCK8 ± 0.8 (N = 13)
Venus-cp172Venus FLARE Cameleon19 ± 4.8 (N = 10)
mCherry-mCherry FLARE Cameleon5 ± 0.8 (N = 23)
mCerulean3-mCerulean3 FLARE Cameleon9 ± 1.5 (N = 11)
Venus-cp172 Venus FLARE ICUE19 ± 1.2 (N = 40)

Materials and methods

Key resources table
Reagent type (species)
or resource
DesignationSource or referenceIdentifiers
Cell Line
(Homo sapiens)
HEK293-TRRID:CVCL_0063
Cell Line
(Homo sapiens)
HeLaRRID:CVCL_0030
Cell Line
(Mus musculus)
Min6RRID:CVCL_0431
Cell Line
(Rattus norvegicus)
REF-52RRID:CVCL_6848
Chemical
Compound, Drug
ForskolinLC LaboratoriesF9929
Chemical
Compound, Drug
3-Isobutyl-1-methylxanthine
(IBMX)
SigmaI5879
Chemical
Compound, Drug
H-89LC LaboratoriesH5239
Chemical
Compound, Drug
Epidermal Growth
Factor (EGF)
SigmaE9644
Chemical
Compound, Drug
U0126SigmaU120
Chemical
Compound, Drug
Phorbol 12-Myristate
13-Acetate (PMA)
LC LaboratoriesP-1680
Chemical
Compound, Drug
Tetraethylammonium
chloride (TEA)
SigmaT2265
Chemical
Compound, Drug
ionomycinEMD Millipore407951
Chemical
Compound, Drug
thapsigarginCayman Chemical10522
Chemical
Compound, Drug
histamineSigmaH7250
Commerical KitLipofectamine-2000Invitrogen11668019
Commerical KitPolyjetSignaGenSL100688
Recombinant
DNA Reagent
pCDNA3 AKAR4PMID: 20838685
Recombinant
DNA Reagent
pCDNA3 EKAR-EVPMID: 21976697
Recombinant
DNA Reagent
pCDNA3 CKAR1PMID: 12782683
Recombinant
DNA Reagent
FRET MLCK sensorPMID: 15071183
Recombinant
DNA Reagent
pCDNA3 YC3.6 CameleonPMID: 10051607
Recombinant
DNA Reagent
pCDNA3 ICUE3PMID: 19603118
Strain
(Escherichia coli)
BL-21 Codon
Optimized Plus
New England BiolabsC2527
SoftwareFIJIRRID:SCR_014294
SoftwareMetaFluorRRID:SCR_002285
SoftwareMicromanagerRRID:SCR_000415
SoftwareZeiss ActiovisionRRID:SCR_002677
SoftwareMATLABRRID:SCR_001622
SoftwareGraphPad PrismRRID:SCR_002798

Plasmid and construct construction

Request a detailed protocol

Cloning was performed using the pRSET-B vector using typical molecular cloning methods using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with Phusion polymerase (New England Biolabs), restriction enzyme digestion, and ligation with T4 DNA ligase. To clone Venus-cp172Venus FLARE, AKAR4 was sub-cloned from a modified pCDNA3 to pRSET-B between the BamHI and EcoRI restriction enzyme sites. mVenus was then PCR amplified with primers encoding a BamHI site at the 5’ end and an SphI site at the 3’ end, and the resulting PCR product was digested with BamHI and SphI and ligated to pRSET-B AKAR4 digested with BamHI and SphI, with the mCerulean gene removed. Venus-cp172Venus FLARE AKAR was then sub-cloned back into a modified pCDNA3 vector using the BamHI and EcoRI sites. Other color variants were created by replacing the genes for the fluorescent proteins in other FLARE AKAR variants in pRSET-B, either between the BamHI and SphI sites for the N-terminal fluorescent protein, or SacI and EcoRI for C-terminal fluorescent proteins. Finalized constructs intended for mammalian expression were then sub-cloned into a modified pcDNA3 expression vector between the BamHI and EcoRI sites. FLARE variants of other sensors were created by amplifying the molecular switch from EKAR-EV, CKAR2, Cameleon and ICUE3 with primers encoding the SphI and SacI sites, digesting the PCR product with SphI and SacI enzymes, and ligating them to the relevant pRSET-B FLARE AKAR plasmid digested with SphI and SacI to remove the domains involved in the molecular switch for FLARE AKAR. The final constructs were then subcloned into a modified pCDNA3 expression vector between the BamHI and EcoRI sites. Targeted versions of the sensors were created either by PCR amplifying the sensor with primers containing the targeting sequence and ligating it to the pCDNA3 expression vector between BamHI and EcoRI, or by subcloning the construct into a plasmid already containing the targeting sequence. N-terminal targeting sequences were placed between HindIII and EcoRI, and C-terminal targeting sequences between EcoRI and XbaI. All cloning steps were performed using DH5α strain of E. coli.

The threonine to alanine mutants for Venus-cp172Venus FLARE AKAR and FLARE EKAR were created by performing site-directed mutagenesis using a standard single-primer PCR-based protocol. The threonine to alanine mutant for Venus-cp172Venus FLARE CKAR, as well as the chromophore-dead variant of Venus-cp172Venus FLARE AKAR, was created using Gibson assembly, amplifying the appropriate fragment with a primer containing the desired mutation.

The YFP MLCK FLARE sensor was created by replacing the CFP portion of an existing two color sensor (Isotani et al., 2004; Geguchadze et al., 2004) with a PCR amplified mVenus fragment flanked by XhoI and AgeI restriction sites. Moreover, the coding sequence for the CFP D1 ER sequence was manufactured by Genewiz. The sensor consists of two oxmCer3 proteins (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26158227) flanking the D1 ER calcium sensing domains (Palmer et al., 2004) and a C-terminal KDEL ER retention sequence.

Cell culture and transfection

Request a detailed protocol

HEK293T and HeLa cells cells were maintained using Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Cells were seeded onto a 35-mm glass-bottom imaging dish and incubated at 37°C with 5% ambient carbon dioxide. HEK293T, HeLa, MIN6, and REF-52 cell lines were maintained separately from other cells and were screened regularly to confirm the absence of mycoplasma contamination using Hoechst staining. As the origin of the cells was not central to the nature of these experiments, we did not further validate the identity of the cell lines. Cells were transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen), Polyjet (SignaGen), or calcium phosphate and incubated for 12–48 hr before imaging. The growth media was removed immediately before imaging, and the cells were washed two or more times with Hanks Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) buffer with glucose at room temperature. The cells were imaged in HBSS buffer with glucose at either room temperature or 37°C.

Fluorescence polarization microscopy

View detailed protocol

Fluorescence anisotropy reporter co-imaging is described in more detail in Bio-protocol (Ross et al., 2019). Widefield images were collected using an Zeiss AxioObserver equipped for fluorescence polarization microscopy, using one of two setups. In the first setup, a wire grid polarizer (Meadowlark Optics) was placed in the excitation pathway between the LED illuminators and reflector turret containing filter cubes specific for CFP (Zeiss), YFP (Zeiss), and mCherry (Semrock). Images were generally collected using a 20 × 0.75 NA objective lens. Polarizations parallel and perpendicular to the excitation polarizations were separated using Optical Insights Dual-View using their polarization splitting module. Both images were simultaneously collected in a single image collected by a water-cooled Orca-R2 (Hamamatsu). In the second setup, a polarizer (Chroma) was placed in the excitation pathway between the xenon arclamp and the excitation filters. Images were collected using a 20 × 0.45 NA objective lens. Polarizations were separated using an Opto-Split II LS image splitter, with two wire grid polarizers (Meadowlark) oriented parallel and perpendicular to the excitation polarizer. Images of both polarizations were collected using a Hamamatsu Flash 4.0 sCMOS camera. Two-photon imaging was performed using a Zeiss 7 MP with GaAsP non-descanned detectors housed at the University of Maryland School of Medicine confocal facility. Coherent Chameleon and OPO lasers were used for excitation. Fluorescence was filtered using an ET680 short pass filter for two-photon microscopy (Chroma) prior to separating polarizations with a one inch broadband polarizing beamsplitter cube (Thorlabs) mounted using a custom 3D printed cube. Images were collected using a 10×, 0.3 NA Plan-apochromat objective lens. In vivo imaging was performed on C57Bl/6 mice under isoflurane anesthesia.

Image analysis

Request a detailed protocol

Image analysis was performed using Fiji (ImageJ) open-source image processing software. Polarization images were cropped and aligned using either the Zeiss Axiovision software or Fiji’s built-in StackReg registration plugin. In Fiji, regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn around each cell, as well as one in the background. ROI intensities were background subtracted in each channel to estimate fluorescence emission intensity, and anisotropy was calculated as described by Lakowicz (2010). Anisotropies were calculated using the conventional equation (Geguchadze et al., 2004):

r=P-gSP+2gS

where g is the correction factor that accounts for differences in polarization transmission efficiencies within the instrument. The g-factor was calculated using an isotropic fluorescein solution as described by Piston and Rizzo (2008). Anisotropy was calculated by subtracting the anisotropy at each time point by the anisotropy at the time point right before drug addition. The magnitude of the anisotropy changes were calculated by taking the difference between the average anisotropy when the signal peaked or plateaued and the average anisotropy of the baseline time points before drug was added.

Protein purification

Request a detailed protocol

Purification of the FLARE-Cameleon sensors was done using the BL21-RIL Codon Plus strain of E. coli, which were transformed with the construct cloned in the pRSET-B vector, with a Poly-His tag in the header sequence to allow for metal ion binding. The cells were grown to an OD of 0.2, when expression was induced with IPTG and allowed to grow overnight. The cells were then pelleted, frozen, resuspended, and lysed by sonication. Protein purification was performed using column chromatography with Ni-NTA resin. Fractions were collected and analyzed using SDS-PAGE; fractions showing sufficiently pure protein product were pooled.

In vitro calcium calibration

Request a detailed protocol

In vitro calibration of the FLARE-Cameleon sensor was performed using fluorescence anisotropy spectroscopy in solutions with varying concentrations of free calcium in a temperature-controlled environment. These solutions were made by titrating known concentrations of free EGTA and calcium-saturated EGTA at pH 7.1 (Calcium Concentration Kit #1--Thermo Scientific). The fluorescence anisotropy was measured using a Photon Technology International QuantaMaster spectrofluorometer equipped with a Xenon flash lamp, fluorescence polarizers, and a Peltier cuvette holder for temperature control. Anisotropies were calculated using integrated intensities of S- and P-polarized emission spectra. The correction factor G was measured by measuring the P- and S-polarized emission spectra of fluorescein, which is assumed to be isotropic, and taking the ratio of their measured integrated fluorescence intensities. To determine the dissociation constant (Kd) and Hill coefficient (n), the anisotropy vs. calcium concentration data were fit to the following equation:

r=rmin+(rmaxrmin)([Ca2+]Kd+[Ca2+])n

Data availability

Source data have been provided for Figures 1 to 4.

References

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Brian L Ross

    1. Department of Pharmacology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, United States
    2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9020-627X
  2. Brian Tenner

    1. Department of Pharmacology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, United States
    2. Program in Molecular Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
    Contribution
    Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  3. Michele L Markwardt

    Department of Physiology, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, United States
    Contribution
    Resources, Data curation, Validation, Investigation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  4. Adam Zviman

    Department of Physiology, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, United States
    Contribution
    Investigation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  5. Guoli Shi

    Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, United States
    Contribution
    Investigation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  6. Jaclyn P Kerr

    Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, United States
    Contribution
    Investigation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  7. Nicole E Snell

    Department of Physiology, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, United States
    Contribution
    Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  8. Jennifer J McFarland

    Department of Physiology, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, United States
    Contribution
    Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  9. Joseph R Mauban

    Department of Physiology, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, United States
    Contribution
    Investigation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  10. Christopher W Ward

    Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, United States
    Contribution
    Resources, Supervision, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  11. Megan A Rizzo

    Department of Physiology, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, United States
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing—original draft, Project administration, Writing—review and editing
    For correspondence
    mrizz001@umaryland.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6528-7768
  12. Jin Zhang

    1. Department of Pharmacology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, United States
    2. Program in Molecular Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
    3. Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Writing—review and editing
    For correspondence
    jzhang32@ucsd.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7145-7823

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R35 CA197622)

  • Jin Zhang

National Institutes of Health (R01 DK073368)

  • Jin Zhang

National Institutes of Health (R01 MH111516)

  • Jin Zhang

National Institutes of Health (R01 DK077140)

  • Megan A Rizzo

National Institutes of Health (R01 HL122827)

  • Megan A Rizzo

National Institutes of Health (R01 MH111527)

  • Megan A Rizzo

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Sohum Mehta for his help in creation of graphics as well as critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by: NIH R35 CA197622, R01DK073368, and R01MH111516 (to JZ), as well as by R01DK077140, R01HL122827, and R01MH111527 (to MAR).

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All work involving mice was performed in accordance and recommendations of the NIH's Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Work was performed under protocols approved by the University of Maryland, Baltimore's Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol # 1213012). Procedures were performed under isoflurane anesthesia to minimize suffering.

Copyright

© 2018, Ross et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,970
    views
  • 891
    downloads
  • 65
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Brian L Ross
  2. Brian Tenner
  3. Michele L Markwardt
  4. Adam Zviman
  5. Guoli Shi
  6. Jaclyn P Kerr
  7. Nicole E Snell
  8. Jennifer J McFarland
  9. Joseph R Mauban
  10. Christopher W Ward
  11. Megan A Rizzo
  12. Jin Zhang
(2018)
Single-color, ratiometric biosensors for detecting signaling activities in live cells
eLife 7:e35458.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.35458

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.35458

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Marius Landau, Sherif Elsabbagh ... Joachim E Schultz
    Research Article

    The biosynthesis of cyclic 3′,5′-adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) by mammalian membrane-bound adenylyl cyclases (mACs) is predominantly regulated by G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Up to now the two hexahelical transmembrane domains of mACs were considered to fix the enzyme to membranes. Here, we show that the transmembrane domains serve in addition as signal receptors and transmitters of lipid signals that control Gsα-stimulated mAC activities. We identify aliphatic fatty acids and anandamide as receptor ligands of mAC isoforms 1–7 and 9. The ligands enhance (mAC isoforms 2, 3, 7, and 9) or attenuate (isoforms 1, 4, 5, and 6) Gsα-stimulated mAC activities in vitro and in vivo. Substitution of the stimulatory membrane receptor of mAC3 by the inhibitory receptor of mAC5 results in a ligand inhibited mAC5–mAC3 chimera. Thus, we discovered a new class of membrane receptors in which two signaling modalities are at a crossing, direct tonic lipid and indirect phasic GPCR–Gsα signaling regulating the biosynthesis of cAMP.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Shraddha KC, Kenny H Nguyen ... Thomas C Boothby
    Research Article

    The conformational ensemble and function of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are sensitive to their solution environment. The inherent malleability of disordered proteins, combined with the exposure of their residues, accounts for this sensitivity. One context in which IDPs play important roles that are concomitant with massive changes to the intracellular environment is during desiccation (extreme drying). The ability of organisms to survive desiccation has long been linked to the accumulation of high levels of cosolutes such as trehalose or sucrose as well as the enrichment of IDPs, such as late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins or cytoplasmic abundant heat-soluble (CAHS) proteins. Despite knowing that IDPs play important roles and are co-enriched alongside endogenous, species-specific cosolutes during desiccation, little is known mechanistically about how IDP-cosolute interactions influence desiccation tolerance. Here, we test the notion that the protective function of desiccation-related IDPs is enhanced through conformational changes induced by endogenous cosolutes. We find that desiccation-related IDPs derived from four different organisms spanning two LEA protein families and the CAHS protein family synergize best with endogenous cosolutes during drying to promote desiccation protection. Yet the structural parameters of protective IDPs do not correlate with synergy for either CAHS or LEA proteins. We further demonstrate that for CAHS, but not LEA proteins, synergy is related to self-assembly and the formation of a gel. Our results suggest that functional synergy between IDPs and endogenous cosolutes is a convergent desiccation protection strategy seen among different IDP families and organisms, yet the mechanisms underlying this synergy differ between IDP families.