Tropical Disease: Dissecting the schistosome cloak

Two proteins required for the growth of a skin-like structure called the tegument in parasitic flatworms could be new targets for drugs to kill these parasites.
  1. Carolyn E Adler  Is a corresponding author
  1. Cornell University, United States

Schistosomiasis is a devastating disease that affects around 200 million people worldwide. It is caused by parasitic flatworms known as flukes or schistosomes, which can infect people through exposure to contaminated drinking water and poor sanitation. Current treatments only work after infection has occurred, which makes it difficult to eradicate this disease completely (World Health Organization, 2018).

Schistosomes belong to the animal clade called neodermata, which consists of approximately 100,000 species of parasitic flatworms (Littlewood, 2006). The key evolutionary innovation defining this clade is a skin-like structure called the tegument that allows the parasites to withstand particularly harsh environments, such as the human digestive system and the bloodstream. It also helps the worms to absorb nutrients and attach to their hosts, important adaptions that potentially enabled the worms to become parasites.

Since all parasitic flatworms have a tegument, it is a prime target for drug development. Indeed, the only drug that is currently available for the treatment of schistosomiasis, praziquantel, is thought to work by dissolving the tegument, although the mechanisms involved remain unknown (Chai, 2013). We also do not fully understand how adult schistosomes generate and maintain their teguments.

Some studies indicate that schistosomes can survive inside human hosts for decades without getting detected by the immune system (Basch, 1991). Until recently, visualizing the tegument has required the use of electron microscopy, a technique that is difficult to combine with other strategies for highlighting cells. Now, in eLife, James Collins and colleagues at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (UTSW), James Cook University and the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute – including George Wendt of UTSW as first author – report a straightforward method to label the tegument with fluorescent dyes (Wendt et al., 2018).

Soaking mature schistosomes in water causes the tegument to swell, which damages its membrane and so allows the fluorescent dyes to seep into it. Unlike electron microscopy, fluorescent dyes are compatible with other cell biology techniques, such as lineage-tracing, in situ hybridization and antibody labeling. By using these methods, Wendt et al. were able to determine the identity and birthdate of the cells in the tegument. The results showed that far from being a static structure, the tegument constantly incorporates new cells, which are produced by adult stem cells (Figure 1; Collins et al., 2013). The rapid turnover of cells in the tegument resembles the production of epithelial cells in free-living flatworms called planarians, from which parasitic flatworms have evolved (Laumer et al., 2015; Egger et al., 2015).

Schematic of the tegument in adult flatworms.

Parasitic flatworms (schistosomes) live in the human bloodstream and are covered by a skin-like structure called the tegument, which is constantly replenished by newly produced stem cells (see inset) and so protects the worms from being detected by the host immune system. The tegument (blue) is made of cells that have fused together to form a continuous structure and express a protein called TSP-2 (purple). The cells in the tegument derive from stem cells (orange). These stem cells divide to produce intermediate cells (yellow), which mature to produce the cells (blue) that fuse to form the tegument. These tegument-fated intermediate cells express ‘zinc-finger’ proteins (zfp) and are necessary to build the skin-like structure. Creating drugs that could block these genes may present a new opportunity to treat schistosomiasis.

Wendt et al. then used an antibody that recognizes TSP-2: this protein, which is found on the surface of the tegument, is a molecular target in efforts to develop a schistosome vaccine (Pearson et al., 2012). This antibody allowed the researchers to purify the tegument cells, to determine the genes that are expressed by these cells, and to identify the proteins that are required to build the tegument. Wendt et al. identified two ‘zinc-finger’ proteins, which are only found in flatworms. These two proteins are necessary for forming the cells that produce the tegument. When one of these proteins is blocked, the schistosomes can no longer adhere to substrates, which may affect their ability to interact with the host.

Intriguingly, free-living planarians also rely on stem cells that express a similar zinc-finger protein to generate their epidermis (van Wolfswinkel et al., 2014; Tu et al., 2015). So, even though they have very different surfaces, parasitic flatworms and free-living flatworms employ strikingly similar molecular processes to make their ‘skin’. These conserved mechanisms may therefore be a prime target for drugs that treat schistosomiasis by preventing the formation of the tegument.

The dynamic nature of the tegument demonstrated in the study of Wendt et al. raises key questions about schistosomes and their host-parasite relationships. In particular, it is unclear how the integrity of the tegument can be maintained while its cells are constantly turning over. Over the course of its life, a schistosome displays antigens on its exterior that, presumably, reveal to its host that it is a foreign invader. So how does the worm regulate which proteins remain on its surface when new cells constantly join the tegument?

It has previously been hypothesized that rapid shedding of the tegument could be a mechanism to evade the immune system of the host, to potentially prevent antigens from being exposed (Abath and Werkhauser, 1996). More research is needed to determine how the constant replacement of the tegument cells contributes to the schistosome’s ability to evade host immune systems. Furthermore, expanding the repertoire of potential treatments remains a high priority, given the extreme number and diversity of parasitic flatworms, and the debilitating effects of the diseases they cause in livestock and in humans.

References

  1. Book
    1. Basch PF
    (1991)
    Schistosomes: Development, Reproduction, and Host Relations
    Oxford University Press.
  2. Book
    1. Littlewood DT
    (2006)
    The evolution of parasitism in flatworms
    In: Maule A. G, Marks N. J, editors. Parasitic Flatworms: Molecular Biology, Biochemistry, Immunology and Physiology. Wallingford: CABI. pp. 1–36.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Carolyn E Adler

    Carolyn E Adler is in the College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, United States

    For correspondence
    cea88@cornell.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3883-0654

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published:

Copyright

© 2018, Adler

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,012
    views
  • 61
    downloads
  • 4
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Carolyn E Adler
(2018)
Tropical Disease: Dissecting the schistosome cloak
eLife 7:e36813.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36813

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Developmental Biology
    Leif Benner, Savannah Muron ... Brian Oliver
    Research Article

    Differentiation of female germline stem cells into a mature oocyte includes the expression of RNAs and proteins that drive early embryonic development in Drosophila. We have little insight into what activates the expression of these maternal factors. One candidate is the zinc-finger protein OVO. OVO is required for female germline viability and has been shown to positively regulate its own expression, as well as a downstream target, ovarian tumor, by binding to the transcriptional start site (TSS). To find additional OVO targets in the female germline and further elucidate OVO’s role in oocyte development, we performed ChIP-seq to determine genome-wide OVO occupancy, as well as RNA-seq comparing hypomorphic and wild type rescue ovo alleles. OVO preferentially binds in close proximity to target TSSs genome-wide, is associated with open chromatin, transcriptionally active histone marks, and OVO-dependent expression. Motif enrichment analysis on OVO ChIP peaks identified a 5’-TAACNGT-3’ OVO DNA binding motif spatially enriched near TSSs. However, the OVO DNA binding motif does not exhibit precise motif spacing relative to the TSS characteristic of RNA polymerase II complex binding core promoter elements. Integrated genomics analysis showed that 525 genes that are bound and increase in expression downstream of OVO are known to be essential maternally expressed genes. These include genes involved in anterior/posterior/germ plasm specification (bcd, exu, swa, osk, nos, aub, pgc, gcl), egg activation (png, plu, gnu, wisp, C(3)g, mtrm), translational regulation (cup, orb, bru1, me31B), and vitelline membrane formation (fs(1)N, fs(1)M3, clos). This suggests that OVO is a master transcriptional regulator of oocyte development and is responsible for the expression of structural components of the egg as well as maternally provided RNAs that are required for early embryonic development.

    1. Developmental Biology
    Saira Amir, Olatunbosun Arowolo ... Alexander Suvorov
    Research Article

    Over the past several decades, a trend toward delayed childbirth has led to increases in parental age at the time of conception. Sperm epigenome undergoes age-dependent changes increasing risks of adverse conditions in offspring conceived by fathers of advanced age. The mechanism(s) linking paternal age with epigenetic changes in sperm remain unknown. The sperm epigenome is shaped in a compartment protected by the blood-testes barrier (BTB) known to deteriorate with age. Permeability of the BTB is regulated by the balance of two mTOR complexes in Sertoli cells where mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) promotes the opening of the BTB and mTOR complex 2 (mTORC2) promotes its integrity. We hypothesized that this balance is also responsible for age-dependent changes in the sperm epigenome. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed reproductive outcomes, including sperm DNA methylation in transgenic mice with Sertoli cell-specific suppression of mTORC1 (Rptor KO) or mTORC2 (Rictor KO). mTORC2 suppression accelerated aging of the sperm DNA methylome and resulted in a reproductive phenotype concordant with older age, including decreased testes weight and sperm counts, and increased percent of morphologically abnormal spermatozoa and mitochondrial DNA copy number. Suppression of mTORC1 resulted in the shift of DNA methylome in sperm opposite to the shift associated with physiological aging – sperm DNA methylome rejuvenation and mild changes in sperm parameters. These results demonstrate for the first time that the balance of mTOR complexes in Sertoli cells regulates the rate of sperm epigenetic aging. Thus, mTOR pathway in Sertoli cells may be used as a novel target of therapeutic interventions to rejuvenate the sperm epigenome in advanced-age fathers.