1. Cell Biology
  2. Physics of Living Systems
Download icon

Mechanically stimulated ATP release from murine bone cells is regulated by a balance of injury and repair

  1. Nicholas Mikolajewicz
  2. Elizabeth A Zimmermann
  3. Bettina M Willie
  4. Svetlana V Komarova  Is a corresponding author
  1. McGill University, Quebec, Canada
  2. Shriners Hospital for Children - Canada, Quebec, Canada
  3. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Quebec, Canada
Research Article
  • Cited 0
  • Views 619
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2018;7:e37812 doi: 10.7554/eLife.37812

Abstract

Bone cells sense and actively adapt to physical perturbations to prevent critical damage. ATP release is among the earliest cellular responses to mechanical stimulation. Mechanical stimulation of a single murine osteoblast led to the release of 70 ± 24 amole ATP, which stimulated calcium responses in neighboring cells. Osteoblasts contained ATP-rich vesicles that were released upon mechanical stimulation. Surprisingly, interventions that promoted vesicular release reduced ATP release, while inhibitors of vesicular release potentiated ATP release. Searching for an alternative ATP release route, we found that mechanical stresses induced reversible cell membrane injury in vitro and in vivo. Ca2+/PLC/PKC-dependent vesicular exocytosis facilitated membrane repair, thereby minimizing cell injury and reducing ATP release. Priming cellular repair machinery prior to mechanical stimulation reduced subsequent membrane injury and ATP release, linking cellular mechanosensitivity to prior mechanical exposure. Thus, our findings position ATP release as an integrated readout of membrane injury and repair.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37812.001

eLife digest

Athletes' skeletons get stronger with training, while bones weaken in people who cannot move or in astronauts experiencing weightlessness. This is because bone cells thrive when exposed to forces. When a bone cell is exposed to a physical force, the first thing that happens is the release of the energy-rich molecule called ATP into the space outside the cell. This molecule then binds to the neighboring cell to unleash a cascade of responses. ATP can exit the cell either through special canals in the cell membrane or released in tiny pod-like structures called vesicles. It is known that strong forces can injure the cell membrane and cause ATP to spill out. However, it is less clear how ATP is released when cells are subjected to regular forces.

Mikolajewicz et al. investigated whether ATP exits through injured membranes of cells experiencing regular forces. Bone cells grown in the laboratory were gently poked with a glass needle or placed in a turbulent fluid to simulate forces experienced in the body. Dyes and fluorescent imaging techniques were used to observe the movement of vesicles and calculate the concentration of ATP in these cells.

The experiments showed that regular forces in the body do indeed injure the cell membranes and cause ATP to spill out. But importantly, the cells repaired the injuries quickly by releasing vesicles that patch the wound. As soon as the membrane is sealed, ATP stops coming out. From the first injury, cells adapted and quickly strengthened their membrane and repair system to be more resilient against future forces. This process was also seen in the shin bones of mice.

These results are important because knowing how bone cells sense, respond and convert physical forces can help us develop treatments for astronauts, the injured and aged.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37812.002

Introduction

The mechanical environment is an important determinant of bone health, as emphasized by a consistent bone loss in astronauts exposed to microgravity or in paralyzed or bedridden patients (Nagaraja and Jo, 2014). Gravitational and muscle forces act on the skeleton during physical activity resulting in a complex combination of shear forces, strains and pressures. Bone-embedded osteocytes and bone-forming osteoblasts are widely regarded as the mechanosensitive cells in the skeletal system (Weinbaum et al., 1994).

Following mechanical stimulation of rodent and human osteoblasts, transient intracellular free calcium ([Ca2+]i) elevations and ATP release are among the earliest detectable events, which result in autocrine and paracrine purinergic (P2) receptor signaling (Robling and Turner, 2009; Romanello et al., 2001; Genetos et al., 2005). Vesicular release of lysosomes or secretory vesicles, or conductive release via channels such as Maxi anion channels, Volume-regulated anion channels (VRAC), Connexins or Pannexins are the main mechanisms of regulated ATP release in mammalian cells (Mikolajewicz et al., 2018). Pathological ATP spillage also occurs from traumatically damaged cells (Burnstock and Verkhratskii, 2012). Of interest, non-lethal membrane injury has been demonstrated in vivo in several tissues (McNeil and Steinhardt, 2003), including bone (Yu et al., 2017), under physiological conditions. The mechanism of facilitated cell membrane repair has been described and involves Ca2+/PKC-dependent vesicular exocytosis (Togo et al., 1999). However, the contribution of non-lethal cell injury to ATP release and related mechanotransductive purinergic signaling remains unclear.

The goal of this study was to examine the mechanism of ATP release from mechanically stimulated cells of the osteoblastic lineage. Since we have previously demonstrated that transient membrane disruption is required to induce global [Ca2+]i elevations in osteoblasts (Lopez-Ayon et al., 2014), we were particularly interested in understanding the contribution of membrane injury to mechanically induced ATP release. Mechanical forces were applied by local membrane deformation or turbulent fluid shear stress in vitro to BMP-2 transfected C2C12 osteoblastic cells (C2-OB), primary bone marrow (BM-OB) and compact bone (CB-OB)-derived osteoblasts and changes in [Ca2+]i, vesicular exocytosis, membrane permeability and ATP release were assessed. The prevalence of membrane injury in osteocytes at physiological and supraphysiological mechanical strain levels was investigated following in vivo cyclic compressive tibial loading of 10-week-old female C57Bl/6J mice.

Results

Mechanically stimulated osteoblasts release ATP that induces calcium responses in non-stimulated neighboring cells

Osteoblasts from three different sources, C2-OB, CB-OB, and BM-OB, were loaded with [Ca2+]i dye Fura2 and mechanically stimulated with a glass micropipette, which induced qualitatively similar transient global [Ca2+]i elevations, consistent with prior work (Robling and Turner, 2009; Romanello et al., 2001; Genetos et al., 2005) (Figure 1A–C, Figure 1—video 1). L-type voltage-sensitive calcium channel (VSCC) inhibitor Nifedipine and P2 antagonist PPADS significantly reduced the amplitude of mechanically-stimulated [Ca2+]i transients (Figure 1D). L-type VSCC activation occurred gradually (Figure 1E) while the P2 receptor-driven component of the response peaked within seconds of stimulation (Figure 1F). Together, L-type VSCC and P2 receptor-driven component accounted for ~50% of the mechanical stimulated [Ca2+]i transient. Consistent with previous reports (Robling and Turner, 2009; Romanello et al., 2001; Genetos et al., 2005), shortly after a single osteoblast was mechanically stimulated, neighboring cells exhibited delayed secondary [Ca2+]i responses (Figure 1G). Pharmacological interventions revealed that P2 receptors mediated the secondary response in all three osteoblast models, while a tendency for GAP junction involvement was observed in BM-OB responses (Figure 1H). Puff application of 10 µM ATP mimicked the appearance of secondary responders in C2-OB (Figure 1I).

Figure 1 with 1 supplement see all
Osteoblasts are mechanosensitive

(A-C) Single Fura2-loaded C2-OB (A), CB-OB (B) or BM-OB (C) (Top: ALP staining) were stimulated with micropipette and [Ca2+]i was recorded (Figure 1—video 1). Bottom: representative traces (black), means ± SEM (red) (D) Amplitudes of mechanically evoked [Ca2+]i transients in osteoblasts pretreated with vehicle, Nif, Sur or PPADS (see Materials and methods for abbreviations, targets and doses). Means ± SEM, n = 6–15 stimulated cells, normalized to vehicle. (E, F) Contribution of L-type VSCC (E, n = 10) and P2 receptors (F, n = 12) to mechanically evoked [Ca2+]i transients in C2-OB as comparison and difference (insets) of mean ±SEM of vehicle and treatment [Ca2+]i transients. (G) [Ca2+]i in the stimulated (primary) and neighboring (secondary) C2-OB. Top: pseudocolor of 340/380 ratio, white arrows: directions of signal propagation, bottom: [Ca2+]i transients, red arrows: top panel time points. (H) Secondary responsiveness in cultures pretreated with vehicle, Sur, PPADS, Cbx, FFA or Oct. Means ± SEM, n = 7–21 stimulated primary responses, normalized to vehicle. (H) [Ca2+]i transients induced by mechanical stimulation of single C2-OB (left, red curve) or puff application of 10 µM ATP (right). For Figure 1, *significance between treatment and control by ANOVA. Source data for Figure 1 is provided in Figure 1—source data 1.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37812.003

We used a luciferin fluorescence-based imaging technique (Sørensen and Novak, 2001) to directly measure ATP release ([ATP]e) (Figure 2—figure supplement 1). Simultaneous recording of [ATP]e and [Ca2+]i demonstrated that ATP release occurred within seconds after mechanical stimulation (time to peak release: 1.64 ± 0.36 s) and preceded the onset of [Ca2+]i responses in neighboring cells (Figure 2). We measured pericellular [ATP]e concentrations in the range of 0.05–80.5 µM corresponding to a release of 70 ± 24 amole ATP from a single mechanically stimulated osteoblast (Figure 2B). Pericellular [ATP]e significantly correlated with the percentage of secondary responders (Figure 2C).

Figure 2 with 1 supplement see all
ATP release following mechanical stimulation of a single osteoblast.

(A) Fura2-loaded C2-OB bathed in luciferin/luciferase containing PS was micropipette-stimulated. Top: 380 ex/510 em images before (a) and after (b) stimulation of the cell (red outline). Bottom: intracellular (IC) Fura2 fluorescence [Ifura2] of primary (red) and secondary (orange) responders and extracellular (EC) luciferin fluorescence [Iluciferin] (green). (B) Box plot of [ATP]e in pericellular region of stimulated C2-OB, black markers: independent observations, n = 13 stimulated cells. (C) Correlation between [ATP]e and percentage of secondary responders observed in C2-OB (n = 20 stimulated primary responses), dashed line: linear regression. Source data for Figure 2 is provided in Figure 2—source data 1.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37812.006

Vesicular ATP released upon mechanical stimulation is not the primary source of extracellular ATP

Vesicular ATP release was proposed to be a major source of extracellular ATP (5). Using confocal microscopy, we found that an acidophilic marker quinacrine and a fluorescent ATP analog MANT-ATP co-localized in intracellular granular compartments (Figure 3AFigure 3—video 12). Quinacrine-positive vesicular pool was entirely released after treatment with Ca2+ ionophore ionomycin, and only partially by mechanical stimulation (Figure 3B; Figure 3—video 35), while negligible vesicular release was observed in unstimulated cells. Interestingly, vesicular release peaked within 20 s of mechanical stimulation (Figure 3C, D), while ATP release within ~2 s (Figure 2A). Basal vesicular density was 70 ± 4×10−3 vesicles/µm2 (Figure 3E) and mechanical stimulation resulted in the cumulative release of 5 ± 1×10−3 vesicles/µm2 over 100 s post-stimulation (7.2 ± 1.2% of the basal vesicular pool) (Figure 3F). In [Ca2+]e-free conditions vesicular density was unaffected, whereas mechanically evoked vesicular release was markedly suppressed (Figure 3E, F). Treatment with N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) caused a 33 ± 2% increase in the vesicular density (Figure 3E), consistent with a NEM-induced increase in the readily releasable vesicular pool (Lonart and Südhof, 2000), and a 55 ± 8% increase in mechanically-evoked vesicular exocytosis (Figure 3F). Surprisingly, the percentage of secondary responders and activation rates for Ca2+ responses (response amplitude divided by time for signal to increase from 10 to 90% of peak) were unaffected in [Ca2+]e-free conditions, whereas NEM induced a significant decline in the percentage of secondary responders and activation rates (Figure 3G, H). We measured bulk ATP release following mechanical stimulation by media displacement, a model for turbulent fluid shear stress (tFSS, Rumney et al., 2012Figure 3I). Proportional to the extent of tFSS, 21 ± 11 to 422 ± 97 amol ATP/cell were released, approaching 31.5% of total intracellular ATP at high tFSS (Figure 3J). tFSS (10x media displacements) induced release of 324 ± 50 amol ATP/cell, while ionomycin only led to release of 94 ± 5 amol ATP/cell. Moreover, tFSS-induced ATP release was significantly potentiated under [Ca2+]e-free conditions (961 ± 88 amol ATP/cells) and inhibited in NEM-treated cells (41 ± 24 amol ATP/cells) (Figure 3K). We also investigated conductive channels, however, pharmacological inhibition of Maxi-anion channels, P2X7, Connexins, Pannexins, T-type VSCC, TRPV4 or Piezo1 channels did not affect tFSS-stimulated ATP release (Figure 3—figure supplement 1). Although inhibition of L-Type VSCC had a small inhibitory effect (Figure 3—figure supplement 1), our data suggest that conductive channels cannot account for ATP release observed from mechanically stimulated osteoblasts. Importantly, our data show that increases in vesicular release were consistently associated with a reduction in mechanically stimulated ATP release, while inhibition of vesicular exocytosis increased ATP release from mechanically-stimulated osteoblasts.

Figure 3 with 6 supplements see all
Vesicular ATP released upon mechanical stimulation is not the primary source of extracellular ATP.

(A) Confocal images of CB-OB loaded with quinacrine and MANT-ATP, Figure 3—video 1-2. (B) Changes in quinacrine-loaded CB-OB treated with ionomycin (left) or stimulated with micropipette (right, region of interest in white). (C) Vesicular release event in CB-OB (top) coincides with a sudden drop in granular quinacrine fluorescence (bottom), Figure 3—video 3-5.(D) Kinetics of vesicular release from CB-OB stimulated by micropipette at 0 s, n = 37 stimulated cells. (E–H) Quinacrine- (E, F) or Fura2- (G, H) loaded CB-OB were pre-treated (10 min) with vehicle, ionomycin (iono) or NEM or placed in [Ca2+]-depleted physiological solution, and micropipette-stimulated when indicated (+). Vesicular density (E) and cumulative release (F), secondary responsiveness (G) and [Ca2+] response activation rates (H) were determined, n = 7–37 primary cells. (I) tFSS was applied by replacing 50% media volume n times. (J, K) ATP released per cell (left axis) or as percent of cellular ATP content (right axis) was measured following CB-OB stimulation by tFSS (J, black dashed line: rational function fit; red dashed line: corresponding asymptote) or after indicated pre-treatments followed by tFSS (K, 10x media displacements, +), n = 6–8 independent cultures. For Figure 3, means ± SEM, *significance compared to vehicle (E–H), basal ATP release (J) or to tFSS-stimulated vehicle (K) by ANOVA. Source data for Figure 3 is provided in Figure 3—source data 1.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37812.009

Mechanical stimuli regularly and reversibly compromise the integrity of the osteoblast membrane

We hypothesized that mechanically stimulated ATP release is related to membrane injury. Adopting a Fura2-based dye-leakage assay (Togo et al., 1999), we examined changes in 340 ex/510 em Fura2 fluorescence following mechanical stimulation of osteoblasts (Figure 4A). In ~40% of micropipette-stimulated osteoblasts, intracellular Fura2 fluorescence returned to pre-stimulation baseline (minor or no injury; mIn). However, in 30–40% of osteoblasts post-stimulation fluorescence was partially reduced (intermediate injury; iIn) and in 15–20% of osteoblasts completely lost (severe injury; sIn) (Figure 4B). The extent of injury sustained by a micropipette-stimulated cell correlated with the magnitude and duration of [Ca2+]i elevations (Figure 4C–E), as well as the percentage of secondary responders (Figure 4F), suggesting that ATP release is related to the extent of membrane disruption. In a dye uptake assay, we added membrane impermeable dyes, trypan blue (TB) or rhodamine-conjugate dextran (R-dextran), to osteoblasts before or after mechanical stimulation (Figure 4G). When the dyes were applied prior to tFSS, the proportion of dye-permeable osteoblasts positively correlated with the degree of tFSS. The extent of dye uptake was higher for TB (~900 Da) compared to R-dextran (~10 kDa) (Figure 4H,I). However, when membrane permeability was examined 300 s after stimulation, a significantly lower percentage of cells were permeable to the dyes (Figure 4H,I). Hemichannel involvement was excluded, since hemichannel blockers did not affect mechanically-stimulated [Ca2+]i elevations, membrane permeability or ATP release (Figure 4—figure supplement 1). Consistent with transient membrane disruption, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH, ~140 kDa) leaked into the extracellular media proportionally to tFSS magnitude (Figure 4J), even though cell viability was minimally affected 1 hr after tFSS stimulation (Figure 4K). Examining TB uptake following micropipette stimulation, we have found that all C2-OB were TB-permeable immediately upon stimulation, decreasing to 75 ± 22% within 10 s, to 40–50% by 180 s and to 18 ± 12% by 300 s (Figure 4L). Comparing these data to dye leakage experiments suggested that minor injuries resealed within 10 s, intermediate injuries within 20–180 s and severe injuries did not reseal by 300 s. (Figure 4L). Based on predicted molecular radii of the dyes (Erickson, 2009), we estimated the membrane lesion radius to be on the nanometer scale, sufficiently large to permit the efflux of smaller ATP molecules (~507 Da) (Figure 4M).

Figure 4 with 1 supplement see all
Mechanical stimuli regularly and reversibly compromise the integrity of osteoblast cell membrane.

(A–F) Membrane permeability in micropipette-stimulated Fura2-loaded osteoblasts. (A) Top: Schematic of dye-leakage assay. Bottom: 340 ex/510 em before (a) and after (b) CB-OB stimulation (white outline). (B) Representative Fura2 traces in C2-OB with minor (mIn), intermediate (iIn) or severe (sIn) cell injury and relative occurrence frequency (right, n = 35–40 stimulated cells). (C) C2-OB [Ca2+]i responses and differences (inset) for mIn (green), iIn (orange) and sIn (red), n = 8–14 stimulated cells. (D–F) Primary [Ca2+]i response amplitudes (D) and decay constants (E), and secondary responsiveness (F) in CB-OB (black; n = 40 stimulated cells) or C2-OB (white; n = 35 stimulated cells), grouped by cell injury status. (G–K) Membrane permeability in tFSS-stimulated osteoblasts. (G) Top: schematic of dye-uptake assay. Bottom: CB-OB stained with TB (top) or R-dextran (bottom) prior to (0 s, left) or after (300 s, right) tFSS application (10x). Uptake of TB (H) or R-dextran (I) added prior to (0 s) or after (300 s) tFSS stimulation of CB-OB (n = 4 independent cultures). (J) Leakage of LDH from CB-OB 5 min after tFSS (n = 8 independent cultures, normalized to total LDH). (K) Viability of C2-OB 1 hr after tFSS assessed by alamarBlue (n = 8–16 independent cultures). (L) Uptake of TB added at indicated times after micropipette-stimulation of C2-OB (L-a, n = 4–23 stimulated cells) compared to relative frequencies of mIn, iIn and sIn assessed by Fura2-leakage assay (L-b). (M) Calculated minimum membrane lesion radius Rmin required for permeability to LDH, R-dextran, TB, Fura2 and ATP. For Figure 4, means ± SEM, dashed lines: linear regression, *significance by ANOVA. Source data for Figure 4 is provided in Figure 4—source data 1.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37812.018

Osteocyte membranes are reversibly disrupted during mouse in vivo tibia loading

To determine whether mechanically induced repairable membrane disruptions occur in vivo, 10-week-old female C57Bl/6J mice were injected with lysine-fixable Texas Red-conjugated dextran (LFTR-Dex, ~10 kDa) either 30 min prior to or 20 min after cyclic compressive tibial loading to strain magnitudes at the upper level of physiological activities (600 µε) or at supraphysiological osteogenic levels (1200 µε) (Willie et al., 2013) (Figure 5A–D, Figure 5-video 1). In the contralateral non-loaded control tibiae (which experienced habitual loads only), sclerostin-positive osteocytes were observed at a density of 3212 ± 287 cells/mm2 (Figure 5—figure supplement 1),~4–7% of which demonstrated LFTR-Dex uptake, while only 2% of calvarial osteocytes were LFTR-Dex positive (Figure 5E). Cyclic compressive tibial loading in the presence of LFTR-Dex resulted in significantly increased osteocyte dye uptake compared to unloaded bone, demonstrating that in vivo mechanical loading results in cellular membrane disruption (Figure 5F,Gred). Importantly, when LFTR-Dex was administered 20–50 min after 600 µε loading, the levels of cellular dye uptakes were similar to those in unloaded tibia, suggesting that damage evident immediately after loading was repaired within this time period (Figure 5F, light blue). Of interest, when LFTR-Dex was administered 20–50 min after 1200 µε loading, the proportion of osteocyte exhibiting dye uptake was significantly lower compared to non-loaded controls, suggesting that adaptive improvements in membrane integrity occurred in response to the supraphysiological strain (Figure 5F,Gdark blue).

Figure 5 with 2 supplements see all
Osteocyte membranes are reversibly disrupted during in vivo cyclic compressive loading of the tibia.

(A, B) Left tibia of anesthetized mouse was positioned in loading device as shown in picture (A) and schematic (B). Arrows indicate direction of load. (C) The triangle waveform included 0.15 s symmetric active loading/unloading, with a 0.1 s rest phase (−1 N) between load cycles and a 5 s rest inserted between every four cycles. A maximum force of −5.5 N or −11 N was applied, which engenders 600 µε or 1200 µε, respectively at the periosteal surface of the tibia mid-diaphysis in these mice. (D) Experimental design schematic: animals were injected with LFTR-Dex 30 min before (red) or 20 min after (blue) in vivo cyclic tibial loading (5 min). (E) Proportion of cells exhibiting LFTR-Dex uptake in calvariae (n = 5 animals) and control tibiae (n = 20 from 10 animals), normalized to average total cell number, means ± SEM, **p<0.01. (F) Dye uptake in tibia injected before (red) or after (blue) loading at 600 µε or 1200 µε, means ± SEM, n = 5/strain/dye protocol, normalized to non-loaded contralateral tibia, *significance compared to non-loaded tibia, ††significance between dye protocols, by ANOVA. (G) Contrast enhanced images of dye uptake in control (left), and 1200 µε loaded tibia injected with dye before (middle) or after (right) loading. Source data for Figure 5 is provided in Figure 5—source data 1.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37812.021

PKC regulates vesicular exocytosis and membrane resealing

Vesicular exocytosis has been demonstrated to facilitate membrane repair and improve membrane integrity in a PKC-dependent manner (Togo et al., 1999). We examined the role of Ca2+/PLC/PKC pathway during mechanically induced membrane injury and resealing. Pharmacological activation of PKC (Figure 6A, Figure 6—figure supplement 1A) and NEM-induced potentiation of vesicular release (Figure 6—figure supplement 2A) both attenuated tFSS-induced membrane disruption. Depletion of [Ca2+]e, or pharmacological inhibition of PLC (Figure 6—figure supplement 2A,B) or PKC (Figure 6A,B; Figure 6—figure supplement 1A,B) increased membrane disruption in osteoblasts following tFSS or micropipette stimulation. Together these findings suggest that membrane repair was regulated by extracellular calcium influx, PLC/PKC signaling and vesicular exocytosis. We next investigated the link between Ca2+/PLC/PKC pathway and mechanically stimulated [Ca2+]i elevations, vesicular exocytosis and ATP release. Depletion of [Ca2+]e or PLC inhibition consistently reduced the amplitude of mechanically-stimulated [Ca2+]i elevations (Figure 6—figure supplement 2C) and vesicular release (Figure 6—figure supplement 2D), and potentiated ATP release (Figure 6—figure supplement 2E). PKC activation had minor effect on calcium responses (Figure 6—figure supplement 2C), augmented vesicular release (Figure 6C) and reduced ATP release (Figure 6D, Figure 6—figure supplement 1C). In contrast, PKC inhibition potentiated calcium responses (Figure 6—figure supplement 2C), suppressed vesicular release (Figure 6C) and increased ATP release (Figure 6D, Figure 6—figure supplement 1C). PMA-induced PKC activation rescued vesicle pool depletion following PLC inhibition, thereby positioning PKC signaling downstream of PLC (Figure 6—figure supplement 3). Together these data suggest that mechanically stimulated membrane injury and repair, vesicular release and ATP release are regulated by Ca2+/PLC/PKC-dependent signaling.

Figure 6 with 5 supplements see all
Membrane resealing depends on PKC-regulated vesicular exocytosis.

(A–D) CB-OB were pretreated with vehicle, PMA or Bis, and membrane injury (A, B) vesicular exocytosis (C) and ATP release (D) were assessed. (A) TB uptake at 0 and 300 s after tFSS (10x), n = 5–8 independent cultures. (B) Fura2 leakage, determined as percentage of sIn cells after micropipette-stimulation, n = 9–16 stimulated cells. (C) Cumulative vesicular release over 100 s after micropipette-stimulation, n = 6–10 stimulated cells. (D) ATP release over 60 s following 10x tFSS stimulation, n = 8 independent cultures. (E) Immunoblotting for PKC isoform phosphorylation in CB-OB treated with vehicle, PMA or Bis (30 min); or 30 s, 90 s or 300 s after tFSS (10x). Shown are immunoblots (left), complete gels in Figure 6—figure supplement 4, and densitometry (right) of phosphorylated and total conventional (pPKC pan), atypical (pPKC ζ/λ), novel (pPKC δ/θ), and PKD/PKCµ isoforms. Phosphorylated PKC isoforms were normalized by total PKC levels and reported relative to vehicle, n = 3 independent cultures. (F–H) Relationships between vesicular release (pooled data from vesicular release experiments), membrane disruption (pooled from membrane integrity experiments) and ATP release (pooled from 10x tFSS experiments) following mechanical stimulation of CB-OB, solid line - regression. For Figure 6, data are means ± SEM, *significance compared to vehicle (0 s vehicle for A), significance compared to 300 s vehicle (A) and #significance of indicated comparisons (A), by ANOVA or by regression. Source data for Figure 6 is provided in Figure 6—source data 1.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37812.027

We next examined which PKC isoform is involved in the mechanoresponse. Immunoblot analysis demonstrated that mechanical stimulation (using tFSS) of CB-OB activated conventional PKCα/β and PKD/PKCμ, but not atypical PKCζ/λ or novel PKCδ/θ isoforms (Figure 6E, Figure 6—figure supplement 4). PMA stimulated phosphorylation of conventional and PKD/PKCμ isoforms, but not atypical or novel PKC isoforms, while only basal PKD/PKCμ phosphorylation had a tendency (p=0.09) to be inhibited by Bis. Total PKC levels were unaffected by pharmacological interventions or mechanical stimulation (Figure 6—figure supplement 4G). These findings suggest that the PKD/PKCμ isoform regulates membrane resealing in osteoblasts.

To establish the relationship between vesicular release, membrane disruption and ATP release, we pooled data for the mechanically induced responses from all treatments studied in CB-OB (Figure 6F–H). Mechanically induced vesicular release negatively correlated with the extent of membrane disruption (Figure 6F) and the amount of ATP released (Figure 6G), while membrane disruption positively correlated with amount of ATP released in response to mechanical stimulation (Figure 6H). These data support a model in which mechanical disruption of the cell membrane leads to ATP spillage, while the extent of membrane resealing, regulated by Ca2+/PLC/PKC-dependent vesicular exocytosis, limits the amount of total ATP released (Figure 7).

Proposed model for mechanically stimulated ATP release in osteoblasts.

Resting Osteoblasts: Under basal conditions, the cell membrane is intact and intracellular free calcium levels and PLC/PKC signaling are minimal. Mechanical injury: Mechanical stimulation results in disruption of the cellular membrane, which leads to the influx of calcium, activation of PLC/PKC signalling, and the efflux of ATP. Membrane repair: The disrupted membrane is rapidly repaired through a process involving Ca2+/PLC/PKC-dependent vesicular exocytosis, thereby limiting ATP release. Cellular adaptation: Elevated PKC levels result in priming of the vesicular pathway, likely regulating cellular resilience and responsiveness to subsequence cycles of mechanical stimulation.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37812.024

Discussion

This study establishes a novel mechanism of mechanotransduction in bone cells, which positions ATP release as the integrated outcome of membrane injury (reflective of the destructive potential of mechanical forces) and membrane repair (countering and adapting to the damage). We report that mechanical stimuli in vitro and in vivo induced reversible cell membrane disruption. This disruption resulted in ATP release predominantly through the compromised membrane, rather than through vesicular or conductive mechanisms. Ca2+/PLC/PKC-dependent vesicular release was necessary for successful membrane repair and prevention of further ATP release. Importantly, prior activation of PKD/PKCµ or vesicular priming improved membrane integrity and repair, thereby minimizing membrane injury and ATP release upon subsequent mechanical stimulation, and serving as a mechanism of cellular mechano-adaptive memory.

Membrane injury

We have demonstrated that non-lethal cell membrane injury is routine in mechanically stimulated cells. In vitro, single cell membrane deformation or fluid shear stress transiently compromised cell membrane integrity in 2–30% of cells, which was repaired within 10–100 s. Consistent with findings observed using in vitro models of mechanical stimulation, in vivo cyclic compressive tibial loading engendering physiological and supraphysiological strains resulted in transient osteocyte membrane disruption in 5–10% of cells. Interestingly, supraphysiological mechanical strains improved membrane integrity post-stimulation compared to baseline levels. Previously, non-lethal reversible cell wounding was shown to occur in mechanically active tissues, with membrane-impermeable marker uptake reported in 3–20% of cells in skeletal muscle, 3–6% in skin, 25% in cardiac muscle, 2–30% in lung and aorta (McNeil and Steinhardt, 2003). Consistent with our findings, membrane disruption was reported in 20–60% of long bone osteocytes after in vivo treadmill loading (Yu et al., 2017). The higher prevalence of disruption reported by Yu et al. in long bones was likely a consequence of cumulative tracer uptake over 18 hr (Yu et al., 2017), while our study examined membrane disruption over a 20–50 min period. Our data demonstrated that reparable membrane injuries are common and significantly contribute to ATP release from mechanically stimulated osteoblasts and osteocytes.

ATP release

We observed that osteoblasts release 70 ± 24 amol ATP/cell in response to direct membrane deformation and 21 ± 11 to 422 ± 97 amol ATP/cell in response to tFSS, which is consistent with previously reported estimates ranging from 24 ± 1 to 324 ± 59 amol ATP/cell (Genetos et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2013; Kringelbach et al., 2015; Kringelbach et al., 2014; Genetos et al., 2007; Pines et al., 2003; Romanello et al., 2005; Manaka et al., 2015). Osteoblasts have been reported to release ATP through mechanisms related to vesicular exocytosis (Genetos et al., 2005; Romanello et al., 2005) and L-type VSCC (Genetos et al., 2005). In osteocytes, hemichannels (Kringelbach et al., 2015; Seref-Ferlengez et al., 2016), P2X7 (Seref-Ferlengez et al., 2016) and T-type VSCC (Thompson et al., 2011) have also been implicated. We visualized ATP-containing quinacrine-positive vesicles and directly demonstrated their release upon mechanical stimulation. Surprisingly, the total vesicular ATP content was ~94 ± 5 amol ATP/cell, which, considering that only 7.2 ± 1.2% of vesicles were released upon mechanical stimulation, is much less (<10 amol ATP/cell) than mechanically induced ATP release. Moreover, treatments that potentiated vesicular release resulted in a surprising decrease in ATP release, while treatments interfering with vesicular release enhanced ATP release. In search for an alternative route of ATP release, we found that mechanically stimulated ATP release was proportional to the extent of membrane injury.

Membrane resealing

Vesicular exocytosis is believed to promote membrane repair via membrane insertion, thereby reducing membrane tension and allowing exposed hydrophobic residues to reseal (McNeil and Steinhardt, 2003). We have shown that vesicular release was critical for the repair of mechanically induced membrane injury and that the Ca2+/PLC/PKC pathway regulates vesicular exocytosis in osteoblasts. We interrogated the role of vesicular release in the mechanoresponse using NEM, a modulator of vesicular docking machinery (Lonart and Südhof, 2000). While NEM is commonly used as an inhibitor of vesicular release (Genetos et al., 2005; Kowal et al., 2015), it has also been shown to increase vesicular release probability (Kirmse and Kirischuk, 2006) through accumulation of readily-releasable vesicles (Lonart and Südhof, 2000). Using real-time imaging, we demonstrated that NEM increased the basal vesicular density and potentiated mechanically stimulated vesicular exocytosis in osteoblasts. In the presence of NEM, mechanically induced membrane injury and ATP release were significantly reduced. Vesicular exocytosis has been implicated as a mechanism of ATP release from osteoblasts and osteocytes (Genetos et al., 2005; Kringelbach et al., 2015; Romanello et al., 2005) based on the assumed inhibition of vesicular exocytosis by NEM or vesicular trafficking by brefeldin A, bafilomycin or monensin. However, our data demonstrated that the role of vesicles cannot be inferred without a direct validation of the effect of NEM on vesicular release. In our study, [Ca2+]e depletion abolished mechanically stimulated vesicular release, interfered with membrane repair and increased ATP release. Calcium is one of the first mechanically induced signals that initiates downstream responses (Robling and Turner, 2009), including exocytosis-mediated membrane repair (Cooper and McNeil, 2015). It was previously shown that during in vivo loading of mouse bone, the number of osteocytes exhibiting [Ca2+]i elevations increased proportionally to the magnitude of applied strain (Lewis et al., 2017). We found that PLC and PKCµ, known downstream targets of Ca2+ signaling (Mochly-Rosen et al., 2012), regulated basal vesicle abundance and membrane resealing. Our study suggests that the osteoporotic phenotype reported in PKCµ-deficient bones (Li et al., 2017) may be associated with defective mechanoresponsiveness. Consistent with mechanisms of facilitated membrane resealing (Togo et al., 1999; Cooper and McNeil, 2015), we propose that mechanical stimulation results in membrane disruption, which leads to ATP efflux and Ca2+ influx, triggering vesicular exocytosis and membrane repair that then limits ATP release (Figure 7).

Mechano-adaptive memory

Our findings suggest that osteoblast mechano-adaptive status may be influenced by PKCµ/vesicular signaling. Activation of PKC prior to mechanical stimulation or priming the vesicular pool for release with NEM resulted in drastic decreases in membrane injury and ATP release in response to subsequent mechanical stimulation. Prior work has demonstrated that mechanical loading induces the production and release of LAMP-1-positive vesicles from osteocytes (LAMP-1 colocalizes with the quinacrine tracer-dye used in this study (Cao et al., 2014), which was critical for mechano-adaptive bone formation (Morrell et al., 2018). This mechano-adaptive effect may underlie cellular accommodation in the bone response to mechanical loading previously reported (Schriefer et al., 2005), and explain the reduced responsiveness of osteocytes exposed to higher frequency in vivo mechanical loading, compared to lower frequency loading of the same magnitude (Lewis et al., 2017). Our findings suggest that during repeated mechanical stimulation, the priming of PKCµ/vesicular pathway by earlier stimuli will determine osteoblast resilience and responsiveness to subsequent cycles of mechanical stimulation, representing a mechanism for cellular accommodation.

Concluding remarks

In this study, we established the regulatory mechanisms involved in controlling the amount of ATP released following reversible cellular injury. We have demonstrated that membrane injury and repair are common under physiological stresses in vitro and in vivo, and determined the critical role for PKC-regulated vesicular exocytosis in bone cell membrane repair. We suggest that rather than delivering ATP to extracellular space, exocytosis of ATP-containing vesicles limits the much larger efflux of intracellular ATP through damaged membranes. We propose a model of biological adaptation to mechanical forces, which directly links mechanosensation through reversible membrane injury and ATP release to the development of adaptive resilience against the destructive potential of mechanical forces. PKC-mediated vesicular release provides a target for potential therapeutic interventions to modulate mechano-responsiveness and mechano-resilience in humans habitually experiencing altered mechanical environment, such as astronauts or paralysis patients.

Materials and methods

All procedures were approved by McGill’s University’s Animal Care Committee (protocols # 2012–7127 and 2016–7821) and complied with the ethical guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care.

Key resources table
Reagent type
(species) or resource
DesignationSource or referenceIdentifiersAdditional
information
Cell line
(M. musculus)
BMP2-transfected C2C12
myoblast cells
(C2C12-BMP2; C2-OB)
Dr. M. Murshed,
McGill University
osteoblast cell line
Strain, strain background
(M.musculus, female)
10 week-old C57Bl/6JJackson LaboratoryStock #: 000664;
RRID: IMSR_JAX:000644

primary osteoblast source,
in vivo studies
Software,
algorithm
Calcium
Analyser
DOI: 10.3389/
fphys.2016.00525
MATLAB algorithm
for calcium analysis
Chemical compound, drugMANT-ATPAnaSpecCat. AS-64610fluorescent ATP analog,
5 µM (overnight, 37°C)
Chemical compound, drugGsMTx-4; GsMAlomone LabsCat. STG-100Piezo1 inhibitor,
1 µM (10 min,
room temperature)
Chemical compound, drugU73122; U73CalbiochemCat. 662035PLC inhibitor,
10 µM (10 min,
room temperature)
AntibodyGAPDH (D16H11,
Rabbit antibody)
Cell Signaling
Technology
Cat. 5174; RRID:AB_10622025WB, 1:1000 dilution,
5% BSA/TBST
(1 hr, room temperature)
Antibodyβ-tubulin (9F3,
Rabbit antibody)
Cell Signaling
Technology
Cat. 2128; RRID:AB_823664WB, 1:1000 dilution, 5% BSA/TBST
(1 hr, room temperature)
Antibodyp-PKC (pan; βII Ser660,

Rabbit antibody)
Cell Signaling
Technology
Cat. 9371; RRID:AB_330848WB, 1:1000 dilution, 5% BSA/TBST
(over night, 4°C)
AntibodyPKCα
(Rabbit antibody)
Cell Signaling
Technology
Cat. 2056; RRID:AB_2284227WB, 1:1000 dilution,5% BSA/TBST
(over night, 4°C)
Antibodyp-PKCδ/θ
(Ser643/676,
Rabbit antibody)
Cell Signaling
Technology
Cat. 9376; RRID:AB_330848WB, 1:1000 dilution,
5% BSA/TBST
(over night, 4°C)
AntibodyPKCδ (D10E2, Rabbit
anitbody)
Cell Signaling
Technology
Cat. 9616; RRID:AB_10949973WB, 1:1000 dilution,
5% BSA/TBST
(over night, 4°C)
Antibodyp-PKD/PKCµ
(Ser744/748,
Rabbit antibody)
Cell Signaling
Technology
Cat. 2054; RRID:AB_330848WB, 1:1000 dilution,
5% BSA/TBST
(over night, 4°C)
AntibodyPKD/PKCµ (D4J1N,
Rabbit antibody)
Cell Signaling
Technology
Cat. 90039WB, 1:1000 dilution,
5% BSA/TBST
(over night, 4°C)
Antibodyp-PKCζ/λ (Thr410/403,
Rabbit antibody)
Cell Signaling
Technology
Cat. 9378; RRID:AB_330848WB, 1:1000 dilution,
5% BSA/TBST
(over night, 4°C)
AntibodyPKCζ (C24E6,
Rabbit antibody)
Cell Signaling
Technology
Cat. 9368;
RRID:AB_10693777
WB, 1:1000 dilution,
5% BSA/TBST
(over night, 4°C)
Antibodyanti-rabbit IgG,
HRP-linked
secondary antibody)
Cell Signaling
Technology
Cat. 7074;
RRID:AB_2099233
WB, 1:1000 dilution,
5% BSA/TBST
(1 hr, room temperature)
Chemical compound, drugMinimum Essential Medium
(MEM) α; αMEM
GibcoCat. 12,000–022cell culture
reagent
Chemical compound, drugTrypan Blue Solution,
0.4%; TB
GibcoCat. 15250061in vitro injury
assay dye
Commercial assay or kitAlamar Blue Cell
Viability Reagent
InvitrogenCat. DAL1025cell viability assay
Chemical compound, drugDAPIInvitrogenCat. D1306;
RRID:AB_2629482
IF, nucleur stain, 1:5000 dilution, H20
(5 min, room temperature)
Chemical compound, drugFura2 AMInvitrogenCat. F1221ratiometric calcium-binding dye
(30 min, room temperature)
Chemical compound, drugD-Luciferin
potassium salt
InvitrogenCat. L2916luciferase substrate,
ATP bioluminescence assay
Chemical compound, drugLucifer Yellow
CH, Lithium Salt; LY
InvitrogenCat. L453GAP junction permeable dye,
10 µM (2 min, 37°C)
Chemical compound, drugRhodamine
B-conjugated
10 000 MW Dextran;
R-dextran
InvitrogenCat. D1824in vitro injury assay dye
Chemical compound, druglysine-fixable Texas
Red-conjugated
10 000 MW Dextra; LFTR-Dex
InvitrogenCat. D1863in vivo injury assay dye
AntibodySclerostin (Goat antibody)R and D SystemsCat. AF1589;
RRID:AB_2195345
IF, 1:1000 dilution,
5% BSA/TBST
(over night, 4°C)
Chemical compound, drugCollagenase P from
Clostridium histolyticum
RocheCat. 11213857001enzymatic digest of
bone fragments
Commercial assay or kitCytotoxicity Detection
KitPLUS; LDH
RocheCat. 04 744 926 011LDH leakage assay
AntibodyDonkey anti-goat
IgG-FITC
Santa CruzCat. Sc-2024;
RRID:AB_631727
IF, 1:1000 dilution,5% BSA/TBST
(1 hr, room temperature)
Chemical compound, drugAdenosine 5’-triphosphate
magnesium salt; ATP
Sigma-AldrichCat. A9187
Chemical compound, drugBisindolylmaleimide II; BisSigma-AldrichCat. B3056PKC inhibitor, 1 µM
(10 min, room temperature)
Chemical compound, drugCarbenoxolone
disodium salt; Cbx
Sigma-AldrichCat. C4790Hemichannel blocker, 10 µM
(10 min, room temperature)
Chemical compound, drugFast Red Violet LB SaltSigma-AldrichCat. F3381alkaline phosphatase
assay reagent
Chemical compound, drugGadolinium (III)
chloride; Gd3+
Sigma-AldrichCat. 439770Mechanically-sensitive channel
blocker, 10 µM
(10 min, room temperature)
Chemical compound, drugGSK2193874; GSKSigma-AldrichCat. SML0942TRPV4 inhibitor,
100 nM (10 min, room
temperature)
Chemical compound, drugHC-067047; HCSigma-AldrichCat. SML0143TRPV4 inhibitor,100 nM
(10 min,
room temperature)
Chemical compound, drugL-ascorbic acid
2-phosphate
sesquimagnesium
salt hydrate
Sigma-AldrichCat. A8960osteoblast differentiation
reagent,50 µg/mL
Chemical compound, drugLuciferase from
Photinus pyralis
Sigma-AldrichCat. L9420ATP bioluminescence
assay reagent
Chemical compound, drugML218; MLSigma-AldrichCat. SML0385
T-type VSCC inhibitor,
10 µM (10 min, room temperature)
Chemical compound, drugNaphthol
AS-MX phosphate
disodium salt
Sigma-AldrichCat. N5000alkaline phosphatase
assay reagent
Chemical compound, drugN-ethylmaleimide; NEMSigma-AldrichCat. E3876Vesicular activator,
1 mM (10 min, room
temperature)
Chemical compound, drugNifedipine; NifSigma-AldrichCat. N7634L-type VSCC inhibitor,
10 µM
(10 min, room temperature)
Chemical compound, drug1-octanol; OctSigma-AldrichCat. 297877Connexin blocker,
1 mM (10 min,
room temperature)
Chemical
compound, drug
phorbol
12-myristate 13-acetate;
PMA
Sigma-AldrichCat. P8139PKC activator,
100 nM (10 min,
room temperature)
Chemical compound, drugQuinacrine
dihydrochloride
Sigma-AldrichCat. Q3251Vesicle dye,
10 µM (15 min,
room temperature)
Chemical
compound, drug
Flufenamic
Acid; FFA
Tocris BioscienceCat. 4522Hemichannel blocker,
10 µM (10 min,
room temperature)
Chemical compound, drugIonomycin calcium
salt; Iono
Tocris BioscienceCat. 1704calcium ionophore, 100 µM
Chemical compound, drugPPADS tetrasodium
salt; PPADS
Tocris BioscienceCat. 0625P2R inhibitor,100 µM (10 min,
room temperature)
Chemical compound, drugSuramin hexasodium
salt; Sur
Tocris BioscienceCat. 1472P2R inhibitor, 100 µM (10 min,
room temperature)
Chemical compound, drugA 740003; A7Tocris BioscienceCat. 3701P2X7 inhibitor, 1 µM (10 min,
room temperature)
Chemical compound, drugDulbecco’s Modified
Eagle Medium; DMEM
Wisent Bio ProductsCat. 319–020 CLcell culture reagent
Chemical compound, drugFetal bovine
Serum; FBS
Wisent Bio ProductsCat. 080152cell culture reagent
Chemical compound, drugPenicillin
Streptomycin
Wisent Bio
Products
Cat. 450–201-ELantibiotic, 1%
Chemical compound, drugSodium PyruvateWisent Bio
Products
Cat. 600–110 ULcell culture reagent
Chemical compound, drugCollagenase Type IIWorthington Biochemical
Corporation
Cat. LS004176enzymatic digest
of bone fragments

Solutions

Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 140 mM NaCl, 3 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 2 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.4), sterilized by autoclave. Physiological solution (PS; 130 mM NaCl; 5 mM KCl; 1 mM MgCl2; 1 mM CaCl2; 10 mM glucose; 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.6), sterilized by 0.22 µM filtration. In [Ca2+]-free physiological solution, CaCl2 was excluded and 10 mM EGTA was added to chelate any residual calcium, sterilized by 0.22 µm filtration. Bioluminescence reaction buffer (0.1 M DTT, 25 mM tricine, 5 mM MgSO4, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM NaN3, pH 7.8), sterilized by 0.22 µm filtration. RIPA lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mg/mL aprotinin, 2 mg/mL leupeptin, 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 20 mM NaF, 0.5 mM Na3VO4). TBST buffer (10 mM Tris-HCL, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Tween 20).

Pharmacological interventions

The pharmacological interventions (final concentration, name (abbreviation): molecular target) used in this study were: 10 µM Gadolinium (Gd3+): maxi-anion channel, 10 µM Carbenoxolone (Cbx): connexins/pannexins, 10 µM Flufenamic Acid (FFA): connexins, 1 mM 1-Octanol (Oct): connexins, 100 nM GSK 2193874 (GSK): TRPV4, 100 nM HC 067047 (HC): TRPV4, 10 µM Nifedipine (Nif): L-type VSCC, 10 µM ML218 (ML): T-type VSCC, 100 µM Suramin (Sur): P2 receptors (P2R), 100 µM PPADS: P2 receptors, 1 µM A740003 (A7): P2X7 receptor, 10 µM U73122 (U73): PLC, 100 nM Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA): PKC, 1 µM Bisindolylmaleimide II (Bis): PKC, 1 mM N-Ethylmaleimide (NEM): NSF, 1 µM GsMTx-4 (GsM): Piezo1. Unless stated otherwise, cells were treated with drugs for 10 mins prior to experiments. We validated the effects of hemichannel blockers (Figure 4—figure supplement 1) and evaluated the effects of the inhibitors on ATP- or citrate-induced [Ca2+]i responses in Fura2-loaded C2-OB cells and on luciferin/luciferase bioluminescence (Figure 6—figure supplement 5).

Cell cultures

Three osteoblast models were used in this study. All key experiments required to support our proposed model were performed using primary CB-OB cells; however, additional data from another primary source (bone-marrow-derived; BM-OB) and cell-line (C2-OB) were reported to emphasize the validity of our findings and demonstrate how different osteoblast models perform in this study.

Bone-marrow-derived osteoblasts (BM-OB)

To obtain bone-marrow-derived osteoblasts, 4-6 week C57Bl/6J mice were sacrificed and femur and tibia were collected. Bone pieces were sterilized in 70% EtOH and washed (3x, PBS). Bones were cut in half and placed into longitudinally-cut 1 mL pipette tips, with the exposed marrow end of the bone facing down. Pipette tips were centrifuged in Eppendorf tubes at 12 000 rpm (3x, 30 s) to isolate bone marrow cells. Bone marrow cells were plated at a density of 5×104 cells per cm2 in osteoblastic differentiation medium (αMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% sodium pyruvate, 1% penicillin streptomycin and 50 µg/mL ascorbic acid) and media was refreshed every 2-3 days. Osteoblast phenotype was observed within 7-11 days.

Compact bone-derived osteoblasts (CB-OB)

Bone-marrow-depleted bones, obtained after bone marrow cell isolation, were used as source of CB-OB. Epiphyseal ends of the bone were cut off and the remaining diaphysis were cut into small fragments (<1 mm2 pieces). Bone fragments underwent a three-step enzymatic digest: (i) 10 mL αMEM (serum-free) + 125 µL 0.25% trypsin + 5 µL collagenase P (37°C, 15 min while rotating). (ii) Dispose supernatant and add 10 mL αMEM (serum-free) + 125 µL 0.25% trypsin + 10 µL 100 mg/mL collagenase P (37°C, 30 min while rotating). (iii) Dispose supernatant and add 10 mL αMEM (serum-free) + 125 µL 0.25% trypsin + 100 µL 100mg/mL collagenase II (37°C, 1 hr while rotating, shake vigorously every 10 min). Supernatant from final digest was disposed, bone fragments were rinsed with PBS and plated in 6-well plate in αMEM (10% FBS, 1% sodium pyruvate, 1% penicillin streptomycin and 50 µg/mL ampicillin) for 3-5 days to allow cell outgrowth from fragments. Cells were detached with trypsin, filtered through 40 µm membrane and plated at a density of 1×10 per cm2 in osteoblastic differentiation medium (αMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% sodium pyruvate, 1% penicillin streptomycin and 50 µg/mL ascorbic acid) 2-3 days prior to experiments. Primary osteoblast cultures were sub-cultured for up to 8 passages (1:10 passages).

BMP-2 tranfected C2C12 cells (C2-OB)

The C2C12 cell line (ATCC CRL-1772) stably transfected with BMP-2 (courtesy of Dr. M. Murshed, McGill University) was maintained in DMEM (supplemented with 1% penicillin streptomycin, 1% sodium pyruvate and 10% FBS) at 5% CO2, 37°C humidified atmosphere. Absence of mycoplasma contamination was verified in cryo-preserved stocks of C2-OB cells using the Venor GeM Mycoplasma PCR-based detection kit (Sigma MP0025). To further authenticate the osteoblast phenotype in the C2-OB cell line, osteogenic differentiation was induced with ascorbic acid (50 µg/mL) and changes in osteogenic gene expression after 7 days of culture were assessed by qRT-PCR. Significant increases in expression of osteoblast marker genes Runx2 (+37%, p=0.02), Alpl (+57%, p=0.03) and Col1a1 (+172%, p<0.001) were observed, while Bmp2 expression was stable overtime, thereby confirming the osteoblastic phenotype in this cell-line. Cells between passages 6 and 10 were used in all experiments. 2-3 days prior to experiments, cells were plated at a density of 3×104 cells per cm2.

Osteoblast phenotype

Cells were fixed with formalin (pH 7.4, 8 min) and rinsed with PBS (3x). Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining solution was prepared by combining 4.5 mg fast red violet salt dissolved in 3.75 mL H2O and 3.75 mL 0.2 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.3 with 0.75 mg Naphthol AS-MX phosphate disodium salt dissolved in 30 µL N,N-dimethylformamide. Sufficient staining solution was added to each well to ensure entire surface was covered (approx. 500 µL in 35 mm dish) and incubated at room temperature for 15 min, or until red precipitate formed. Cells were washed with H2O and observed under bright-field microscopy. Alkaline phosphate-positive cells were stained pinkish-red, while yellow hue was observed in alkaline phosphatase-negative cells.

Mechanical stimulation

Local membrane deformation of a single cell

Single osteoblastic cells were stimulated by local membrane deformation with a glass micropipette using a FemtoJet microinjector NI2 (Eppendorf Inc.). The micropipette was positioned approximately 10 µm from the cell membrane at a 45° angle from the horizontal plane and mechanically stimulated at a speed of 250 µm/s with a contact duration of 60 ms. Glass micropipettes were custom-made from glass capillary tubes (1.5 mm outer diameter, King Precision Glass Inc.) using a Sutter Pipette Puller (Flaming/Brown, model P-87).

Bulk stimulation by turbulent fluid shear (tFSS)

50% of the culture medium volume was manually withdrawn and replaced at an approximate speed of 2 resuspensions per second for an indicated number of n times (e.g., 10x tFSS corresponded to 50% vol displacement performed 10 times).

Intracellular calcium recording and analysis

Cells plated on glass-bottom plates (MatTek Corporation) were loaded with a ratiometric fluorescent calcium dye Fura2-AM (r.t., 30 min), washed with PS and allowed to acclimatize for 10 min to reduce the effects of mechanical agitation. [Ca2+]i was recorded at a sampling rate of 2 images per second (2 Hz) using a Nikon T2000 fluorescent inverted microscope with 40x objective (Tiedemann et al., 2009). Recordings consisted of ~10 s baseline [Ca2+]i and additional 110–170 s following application of mechanical stimulation or treatment. The excitation wavelength was alternated between 340 and 380 nm using an ultra-high-speed wavelength switching illumination system (Lambda DG-4, Quorum Technologies). Regions of interest (ROI) were manually defined and the ratio of the fluorescent emission at 510 nm, following 340 and 380 nm excitation (f340/f380), was calculated and exported using the imaging software (Volocity, Improvision). All data were imported into an excel spreadsheet for characterization using a MATLAB algorithm previously described (Mackay et al., 2016). The following parameters were obtained for statistical analysis: amplitude (amp; magnitude of response), activation time (t10%-90%; time between 10% and 90% of maximum response), and decay constant (τdecay) of exponential decay region of deactivation phase of transient response. For micropipette stimulation experiments, secondary responsiveness was calculated as the percentage of neighboring cells exhibiting [Ca2+]i elevations.

Vesicle labeling, imaging, and analysis

Localization

To visualize the intracellular distribution and colocalization of quinacrine and MANT-ATP, cells were loaded with MANT-ATP (5 µM, overnight, 37°C) followed by quinacrine (10 µM, 15 min, room temperature). Cells were washed with PS and imaged using a Zeiss LSM 780 laser scanning confocal microscope. An argon and diode laser were used as light sources (ex. 405 nm and 458 nm) and the detection wavelength ranges were set to 410–470 nm and 490–570 nm to ensure separation of overlapping emission spectra, for MANT-ATP and quinacrine, respectively. Images were acquired using a Zeiss Plan-Apochromat 63x/1.40 Oil immersion objective lens. Subsequent analysis was carried out using ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, USA). Vesicular density was determined using ImageJ by counting number of intracellular quinacrine-positive puncta and normalizing count to cell surface area.

Kinetics

To study vesicular release kinetics, time-lapse recordings of quinacrine-loaded cells were acquired with a Nikon T2000 fluorescent inverted microscope after a 10-min period of post-stain acclimatization to minimize the effects of mechanical agitation. Quinacrine-rich vesicles were imaged using a 40x objective at a sampling frequency of 2 Hz for 2 min. To minimize the phototoxic effects of quinacrine, the excitation intensity was set to 33% of peak intensity and the shutter was shut in between 100 ms exposures. Image sequences were exported using the imaging software Volocity (Improvision) for subsequent analysis in ImageJ. To quantify the kinetics of vesicular release, sudden losses of fluorescence were monitored. Vesicles that gradually came in and out of focus did not qualify as release events. SparkSpotter (Babraham Bioinformatics, UK), an ImageJ plugin, was used to identify release events in temporally reversed and contrast-enhanced image stacks, so that the loss of fluorescence would instead be detected as a sudden increase by the spark identifying algorithm. Acquired data was visually evaluated and represented as either release events per second or cumulative vesicular release for indicated time frame, normalized to unit area.

ATP measurements

Fluorescence recordings of [ATP]e

10 nM D-luciferin- and 2 µg/mL fire-fly luciferase-containing physiological solution (PS) was added to C2-OB and extracellular luciferin fluorescence was recorded (380 ex/510 em). Using an ATP standard calibration curve (Figure 2—figure supplement 1), pericellular (<15 µm from stimulated cell) ATP concentrations [ATP] were obtained. The amount of ATP released by individual cells was estimated by fitting the diffusion profile obtained from the fluorescence measurements with the diffusion equation for release from an instantaneous plane source (Crank, 1975).

[ATP](x, t)=M2(πDt)12exp(x24Dt)

where [ATP](x,t) is ATP concentration at distance x from the source, at time t from the moment of release. M is the amount of ATP released at x = 0, t = 0. D is ATP diffusion coefficient, assumed to be 3.3×10-6 cm2/s at 22°C (Newman, 2001).

Bioluminescent recordings of [ATP]e

Bioluminescence assay was used to measure ATP content in supernatant samples. Luciferin-luciferase reaction solution contained 0.45 µM D-luciferin and 40 µg/mL firefly-luciferase in bioluminsecence reaction buffer. 10 µL supernatants were sampled after tFSS stimulation, added into a glass cuvette containing 100 µL of luciferin-luciferase reaction solution, and measured using FB 12 single tube luminometer. Total cellular ATP content was measured in RIPA-lysed samples. [ATP] was estimated using calibration curves (Figure 6—figure supplement 5).

Membrane integrity assays

Dye leakage

Fura2-loaded osteoblastic cells were mechanically stimulated with a glass micropipette and 510 nm emission intensity was monitored after 340 nm excitation (Togo et al., 1999). Unless stated otherwise, Fura2 leakage refers to the percentage of cells that were severely injured (sIn; complete loss of intracellular Fura2 fluorescence) following micropipette stimulation.

Dye uptake

0.08% TB or 10 µM R-dextran were added before or 5 min after mechanical stimulation, washed with PS, and the proportion of dye-positive cells were assessed by microscopy.

Cytosolic leakage

Extracellular lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was measured using Cytotoxicity Detection KitPLUS. Total cellular LDH content was measured in RIPA-lysed samples.

Cell viability

1 hr after tFSS, AlamarBlue assay was performed according to manufacturer’s protocol. Cell viability was reported as percentage of total cells.

In vivo bone loading

10-week-old female C57Bl/6J mice were injected intraperitoneally with LFTR-Dex either 30 min before or 20 min after loading. In vivo cyclic compressive loading at 600 µε or 1200 µε was applied for 5 min (Willie et al., 2013). Mice were randomized into two groups, anesthetized, and in vivo cyclic compressive loading was applied to the left tibia (216 cycles at 4 Hz the mean mouse locomotor stride frequency [Clarke and Still, 1999]), delivering a maximum force of −5.5 N and −11 N, which engenders 600 µε or 1200 µε, respectively at the periosteal surface of the tibia mid-diaphysis in these mice determined by prior in vivo strain gauging studies (Birkhold et al., 2014). Previous reports have shown strain levels of 200–600 µε are engendered on the medial tibia during walking in the mouse (De Souza et al., 2005; Sugiyama et al., 2012). Strain levels of 1200 µε are considered supraphysiological resulting in a robust bone formation response after 5 days of mouse tibial loading (Willie et al., 2013; Brodt and Silva, 2010) and altered gene expression after only a single bout of loading (Zaman et al., 2010; Kelly et al., 2016). Mice ambulated freely after controlled loading, and were euthanized 50 min post-dye-injection, weighed (Figure 5—figure supplement 1A) and tibiae and calvariae were dissected and fixed in formalin. Tibia lengths were measured (Figure 5—figure supplement 1B) and mid-shaft tibiae were cut into fragments, which were immunofluorescently labeled for sclerostin, counterstained with DAPI, and visualized with Nikon T2000 fluorescence inverted microscope. Right non-loaded tibiae were used as an internal control. Female mice were used instead of males to minimize in-cage aggression and related variations in background mechanical-loading. Experimenter was blinded during image analysis.

Immunoblotting

Cell lysates were extracted in RIPA lysis buffer and centrifuged (12 000 rpm, 10 min, 4°C). Supernatants were collected and protein concentration were determined using Quant-iT protein assay kit (Invitrogen). 70 µg cell lysates were separated on a 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (0.45 µm, 162–0115, Bio-Rat) using a 10 mM sodium borate buffer. The membranes were blocked in 5% BSA in TBST buffer (1 hr, room temperature) followed by overnight incubation at 4°C with primary antibodies (1:1000 dilution, 5% BSA in TBST) for phosphorylated PKC isoforms: p-PKC (pan; βII Ser660), p-PKCδ/θ (Ser643/676), p-PKD/PKCµ (Ser744/748) and p-PKCζ/λ (Thr410/403), or for total PKC isoforms: PKCα, PKCδ, PKD/PKCµ and PKCζ. Blots were washed and incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 hr at room temperature (1:1000 dilution, 5% BSA in TBST) and visualized with a chemiluminescence system.

GAP junction functional assay

Cells were scraped in the presence of GAP-junction permeable dye Lucifer yellow (LY, 10 µM), incubated for 2 min (37°C), rinsed and fixed with formalin (pH 7.4, 8 min). Dye transfer was visualized using wide-field epifluorescence microscopy and cell-cell coupling was visually determined by bright-field microscopy. Cells that were not initially scraped but were physically coupled and LY-positive after 2 min of staining were reported as a percentage of total cells that were physically coupled to scraped neighbors.

Statistical analysis

Data are representative results or means ± standard errors (S.E.M). Curve fittings and [Ca2+]i transient characterization was done in MATLAB (MathWorks). Sample sizes for in vitro experiments indicate the total number of biological replicates (specified in figure legends as number of stimulated cells or number of independent cultures, which were isolated from different mice for primary OB, or represent different plating dates for C2-OB) pooled across a minimum of three independent experiments. For in vivo experiments, sample sizes indicate number of animals. Statistical significance was assessed by ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-hoc test, significance levels are reported as single symbol (*p<0.05), double symbol (**p<0.01) or triple symbol (***p<0.001).

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
    Purinergic Signalling and the Nervous System
    1. G Burnstock
    2. AN Verkhratskii
    (2012)
    Mechanisms of ATP release and inactivation, Purinergic Signalling and the Nervous System, Berlin, Germany, Springer, 10.1007/978-3-642-28863-0_4.
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
    The Mathematics of Diffusion: 2d Ed
    1. J Crank
    (1975)
    Clarendon Press.
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
    Assembly of SNARE core complexes prior to neurotransmitter release sets the readily releasable pool of synaptic vesicles
    1. G Lonart
    2. TC Südhof
    (2000)
    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 275:27703–27707.
  20. 20
  21. 21
  22. 22
  23. 23
  24. 24
  25. 25
  26. 26
    Mechanically induced Ca2+ oscillations in osteocytes release extracellular vesicles and enhance bone formation
    1. AE Morrell
    2. GN Brown
    3. ST Robinson
    4. RL Sattler
    5. AD Baik
    6. G Zhen
    7. X Cao
    8. LF Bonewald
    9. W Jin
    10. LC Kam
    11. XE Guo
    (2018)
    Bone Research, 6, 10.1038/s41413-018-0007-x.
  27. 27
  28. 28
  29. 29
  30. 30
  31. 31
  32. 32
  33. 33
  34. 34
  35. 35
  36. 36
  37. 37
  38. 38
  39. 39
  40. 40
    The mechanism of facilitated cell membrane resealing
    1. T Togo
    2. JM Alderton
    3. GQ Bi
    4. RA Steinhardt
    (1999)
    Journal of Cell Science 112 :719–731.
  41. 41
  42. 42
  43. 43
  44. 44
    Mechanical loading disrupts osteocyte plasma membranes which initiates mechanosensation events in bone
    1. K Yu
    2. DP Sellman
    3. A Bahraini
    4. ML Hagan
    5. A Elsherbini
    6. KT Vanpelt
    7. PL Marshall
    8. MW Hamrick
    9. A McNeil
    10. PL McNeil
    11. ME McGee-Lawrence
    (2017)
    Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 16, 10.1002/jor.23665.
  45. 45

Decision letter

  1. Miguel A Valverde
    Reviewing Editor; Pompeu Fabra University, Spain
  2. Vivek Malhotra
    Senior Editor; The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Spain

In the interests of transparency, eLife includes the editorial decision letter and accompanying author responses. A lightly edited version of the letter sent to the authors after peer review is shown, indicating the most substantive concerns; minor comments are not usually included.

Thank you for submitting your article "Mechanically-stimulated ATP release from murine bone cells is regulated by a balance of injury and repair" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by three peer reviewers, and the evaluation has been overseen by Miguel A. Valverde as Guest Reviewing Editor and Vivek Malhotra as the Senior Editor. The following individuals involved in review of your submission have agreed to reveal their identity: Margarita Calvo (Reviewer #2); Paul McNeil (Reviewer #3).

The reviewers have discussed the reviews with one another and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this decision to help you prepare a revised submission.

Overall, this is an interesting manuscript that seeks to explain the mechano-adaptive mechanism of bone cells to repair an injured plasma membrane. The data support a model whereby mechanical stress triggers a response involving ATP release through the disrupted membrane and calcium/PKC dependent vesicular exocytosis to repair the membrane. This is a novel mechanism based on a combination of imaging and functional assays to evaluate the response of both in vitro and in vivo bone cells.

Summary:

Mechanical signals play a critical role in the cellular/tissue regulation of the osteorticular system. Despite the importance of the mechanical loading in osteoarticular system health and disease, the mechanisms that participate in the maintenance of the integrity of the individual cells exposed to cyclical mechanical loading are not fully understood. Recently, different mechanoosmosensitive ion channels have been implicated in the homeostatic response to mechanical loading. The manuscript by Mikolajewicz and colleagues use different cultured bone cells as well as in vivo assays to address the how non-lethal cell membrane injury triggers cell membrane repair. They show that mechanical stress, generates ATP release, intracellular calcium signals and Ca2+/PKC dependent membrane exocytosis.

The authors build a model in which the mechanical stimulation results in membrane disruption, which leads to ATP efflux and Ca2+ influx, triggering vesicular exocytosis and membrane repair that then limits ATP release. Although it seems a convincing model we would like to see further work done to evaluate the contribution of mechanosensitive ion channels in the repairing mechanism.

Overall, this manuscript is well written (but with overcrowded figures), interesting, timely and will add an interesting angle to the mechanisms of cellular response to mechanical loading.

Essential revisions:

1) It will be essential to evaluate the role of mechanosensitive ion channels in the repair mechanisms. Piezo1/2 and TRPV4 channels have been proposed to play a key role in many mechanobiological responses of different cell types, particularly the osteo-articular system. Therefore, their contribution should be evaluated by experiments in which their activity is assessed by loss-of-function e.g. implementing knockdown by applying si/shRNA and/or specific pharmacological approaches.

2) For the quantification of the western blots, total as well as phosphorylated forms of PKC and PKD should be used for normalization (phospho/total).

Other points to consider:

1) Some of the experiments were run in one type of cells and other ones in other cells? Is there any rationale on using one or the other cell type? If yes, it need to be explained clearly in the text.

2) Please define what the N numbers refer to in each figure.

3) For western blots, please provide the entire gel (as a supplementary figure).

4) Figures are too busy, particularly Figure 6. Can you please simply/reorganize this figure to facilitate its reading/understanding.

Reviewer #1:

"Mechanically-stimulated ATP release from murine bone cells is regulated by a balance of injury and repair" provides interesting and novel observations on mechanotransduction in osteoblasts that might be relevant for in-vivo function, with basic science and biomedical-translational relevance.

I would encourage the authors to explore more in-depth an eventual role of Piezo ion channels in the observed mechanotransduction. They go to great lengths to probe an array of molecules involved in mechanotransduction, Piezo should also be appreciated with more dedication.

Besides this issue, I have not identified additional major concerns.

Reviewer #2:

In this paper, Dr Komarova et al. describe a regulatory mechanism that controls the amount of ATP released in response to reversible membrane injury. They describe that exocytosis of ATP-containing vesicles can limit the efflux of intracellular ATP through the injured membranes (which is of a much larger scale). This is a newly described mechanism of cell resilience against mechanical forces.

I have a few questions that would like the authors to address:

1) You initially say that you tested osteoblasts from three different sources: two primary cultures (BM-OB and CB-OB) and one cell line (C2-OB). I may have missed it, but why did you choose to do some of the experiments in some of these cells and other ones in other cells? Is there any rationale on using one or the other cell type? If yes, it need to be explained clearly in the text.

2) In Figure 1 you show experiments in the 3 different cell types and there are significant differences between them. But these are not mentioned neither discussed in the manuscript. Could you please discuss.

3) Regarding n numbers; I understood that n=1 in the in vivo experiment means one animal. But in the in vitro experiments what do you define as n=1? Is one plate with x number of wells (biological replicates)? Or n=1 is one well? In this case n=x could mean that there are x wells coming all from the same original culture?

4) In the in vivo experiments, why did you only use female mice? Any rationale behind this? Could you explain in the text?

5) For the western blots I would like to see the entire gel, not just to show the band (if it makes the figure complicated you can add the gels as supplemental). But this is important for future replications.

6) Also for WB, why did you not measure total PKC and PKD. You should normalise the quantity of phosphoPKC or phosphoPKD to the total amount of these proteins (phsopho/total).

7) Figure 6 is far too busy and hard to understand. Could you please make it simpler or bigger? (Or divide in two figures when you include the bands and measurements of total kinases over phospho).

8) I think a schematic representation or diagram summarizing your results as a last figure could help a lot to understand the results and will give a clearer message.

Reviewer #3:

This paper adds significantly to a novel, recently proposed (Yu et al., 2017) hypothesis for explaining how bone adapts to mechanical stress. Physiologically relevant mechanical stresses are observed in vitro and in vivo to disrupt osteocyte plasma membranes. These membrane disruptions are not necessarily lethal but can be repaired allowing cell survival of this injury. However the disruption is thought to initiate signaling, such as a rise in intracellular calcium, that then leads to bone adaptation events. Here the authors show that ATP is released through osteocyte disruptions, a second signaling mechanism that might lead to an adaptive response. The sections of the paper dealing with repair are less strong as the authors do not have a technique for quantitative assay of this event.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37812.034

Author response

Reviewer #1:

[…] I would encourage the authors to explore more in-depth an eventual role of Piezo ion channels in the observed mechanotransduction. They go to great lengths to probe an array of molecules involved in mechanotransduction, Piezo should also be appreciated with more dedication.

Piezo channels have been implicated in mechanically-stimulated ATP release in red blood cells [1] and urothelial cells [2], and TRPV channels were shown to be involved in ATP release in urothelial [3, 4] and renal cells [5], cholangiocytes [6], as well as alveolar and bronchial epithelial cells [7]. Both Piezo 1/2 and TRPV4 channels have been previously demonstrated to be sensitive to Gd3+ [8, 9]. However, our data indicate that ATP release from mechanically-stimulated osteoblasts is not inhibited by Gd3+ (Figure 3—figure supplement 1B). We have additionally investigated the involvement of TRPV4 using its specific inhibitors HC 067047 [10] and GSK 2193874 [11], and are now providing new data addressing the involvement of Piezo1 using its specific inhibitor GsMTx-4 [12]. Consistent with the effects of Gd3+, specific inhibitors of Piezo 1 and TRPV4 were not effective in inhibiting mechanically stimulated ATP release from osteoblasts (Figure 3—figure supplement 1). Our findings are consistent with previous work that tested the involvement of Piezo1 and TRPV4 in osteoblasts using Gd3+ [13].

Besides this issue, I have not identified additional major concerns.

Reviewer #2:

[…] 1) You initially say that you tested osteoblasts from three different sources: two primary cultures (BM-OB and CB-OB) and one cell line (C2-OB). I may have missed it, but why did you choose to do some of the experiments in some of these cells and other ones in other cells? Is there any rationale on using one or the other cell type? If yes, it need to be explained clearly in the text.

During the study, we performed all the exploratory experiments in a C2C12-BMP2 cell line due to easy access and consideration for reducing animal use. To validate these findings, we used primary cultures of mouse osteoblasts. Since both bone-marrow-derived [14, 15] and compact-bone derived [16, 17] osteoblast cultures are used in the literature, we explored both cultures, and obtained qualitatively similar results, in spite of differences in the origin and differentiation state of the cells (pre-osteoblast-like in bone marrow derived cultures and late OB-osteocytes-like in compact bone-derived cultures). Since compact-bone derived late osteoblasts/osteocytes are closer to the in vivo model we used in this study, we continued using these cells for data validation throughout the study. Nevertheless, we included the data obtained in bone-marrow-derived cultures, since they demonstrate a side-by-side comparison for responses in osteoblastic cells obtained through different ex vivo protocols. While not a primary objective of this study, we believe that such data is important for understanding how different in vitro models behave. We have now included this clarification in the ‘Cell Cultures’ section of the Materials and methods.

2) In Figure 1 you show experiments in the 3 different cell types and there are significant differences between them. But these are not mentioned neither discussed in the manuscript. Could you please discuss.

As suggested, we have now discussed the differences in GAP junction involvement in bone-marrow-derived osteoblasts in the subsection “Mechanically-stimulated osteoblasts release ATP that induces calcium responses I n non-stimulated neighboring cells”.

3) Regarding n numbers; I understood that n=1 in the in vivo experiment means one animal. But in the in vitro experiments what do you define as n=1? Is one plate with x number of wells (biological replicates)? Or n=1 is one well? In this case n=x could mean that there are x wells coming all from the same original culture?

We have now clarified what n refers to in the ‘Statistical Analysis’ section of the Materials and methods, and in the legend for each figure.

4) In the in vivo experiments, why did you only use female mice? Any rationale behind this? Could you explain in the text?

C57Bl/6J male mice demonstrate significant in-cage fighting compared to females, which introduces higher variation in their background mechanical loading. This is expected to result in a less consistent mechanoresponsiveness and thus require more experimental sample size (i.e., more animals). As suggested, we have now clarified this in the ‘In-vivo Bone Loading’ section of the Materials and methods.

5) For the western blots I would like to see the entire gel, not just to show the band (if it makes the figure complicated you can add the gels as supplemental). But this is important for future replications.

6) Also for WB, why did you not measure total PKC and PKD. You should normalise the quantity of phosphoPKC or phosphoPKD to the total amount of these proteins (phsopho/total).

As suggested in comments 5 and 6, we have now normalized phosphoPKC and phosphoPKD to total PKC or PKD (Figure 6E) and provided complete gels in Figure 6—figure supplement 4.

7) Figure 6 is far too busy and hard to understand. Could you please make it simpler or bigger? (Or divide in two figures when you include the bands and measurements of total kinases over phospho).

8) I think a schematic representation or diagram summarizing your results as a last figure could help a lot to understand the results and will give a clearer message.

As suggested in comments 7 and 8, we have now moved some data from Figure 6 to Figure 6—figure supplement 2 and presented the schematic in Figure 7.

References:

1) Cinar, E., et al., Piezo1 regulates mechanotransductive release of ATP from human RBCs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2015. 112(38): p. 11783-8.

2) Miyamoto, T., et al., Functional role for Piezo1 in stretch-evoked Ca(2)(+) influx and ATP release in urothelial cell cultures. J Biol Chem, 2014. 289(23): p. 16565-75.

3) Birder, L.A., et al., Altered urinary bladder function in mice lacking the vanilloid receptor TRPV1. Nat Neurosci, 2002. 5(9): p. 856-60.

4) Gevaert, T., et al., Deletion of the transient receptor potential cation channel TRPV4 impairs murine bladder voiding. J Clin Invest, 2007. 117(11): p. 3453-62.

5) Silva, G.B. and J.L. Garvin, TRPV4 mediates hypotonicity-induced ATP release by the thick ascending limb. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, 2008. 295(4): p. F1090-5.

6) Gradilone, S.A., et al., Cholangiocyte cilia express TRPV4 and detect changes in luminal tonicity inducing bicarbonate secretion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2007. 104(48): p. 19138-43.

7) Seminario-Vidal, L., et al., Rho signaling regulates pannexin 1-mediated ATP release from airway epithelia. J Biol Chem, 2011. 286(30): p. 26277-86.

8) Coste, B., et al., Piezo1 and Piezo2 are essential components of distinct mechanically-activated cation channels. Science (New York, N.Y.), 2010. 330(6000): p. 55-60.

9) Becker, D., et al., TRPV4 exhibits a functional role in cell-volume regulation. J Cell Sci, 2005. 118(Pt 11): p. 2435-40.

10) Everaerts, W., et al., Inhibition of the cation channel TRPV4 improves bladder function in mice and rats with cyclophosphamide-induced cystitis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2010. 107(44): p. 19084-9.

11) Cheung, M., et al., Discovery of GSK2193874: An Orally Active, Potent, and Selective Blocker of Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 4. ACS Med Chem Lett, 2017. 8(5): p. 549-554.

12) Bae, C., F. Sachs, and P.A. Gottlieb, The mechanosensitive ion channel Piezo1 is inhibited by the peptide GsMTx4. Biochemistry, 2011. 50(29): p. 6295-300.

13) Genetos, D.C., et al., Fluid shear-induced ATP secretion mediates prostaglandin release in MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts. J Bone Miner Res, 2005. 20(1): p. 41-9.

14) Ode, A., et al., CD73/5'-ecto-nucleotidase acts as a regulatory factor in osteo-/chondrogenic differentiation of mechanically stimulated mesenchymal stromal cells. Eur Cell Mater, 2013. 25: p. 37-47.

15) Gharibi, B., et al., Adenosine receptor subtype expression and activation influence the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells to osteoblasts and adipocytes. J Bone Miner Res, 2011. 26(9): p. 2112-24.

16) Brandao-Burch, A., et al., The P2X7 Receptor is an Important Regulator of Extracellular ATP Levels. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 2012. 3: p. 41.

17) Bakker, A.D. and J. Klein-Nulend, Osteoblast isolation from murine calvaria and long bones. Methods Mol Biol, 2012. 816: p. 19-29.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37812.035

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Nicholas Mikolajewicz

    1. Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    2. Shriners Hospital for Children - Canada, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7525-0384
  2. Elizabeth A Zimmermann

    1. Shriners Hospital for Children - Canada, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    2. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    Contribution
    Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing—review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  3. Bettina M Willie

    1. Shriners Hospital for Children - Canada, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    2. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    Contribution
    Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing—review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2907-3580
  4. Svetlana V Komarova

    1. Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    2. Shriners Hospital for Children - Canada, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Data curation, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing—original draft, Project administration, Writing—review and editing
    For correspondence
    svetlana.komarova@mcgill.ca
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3570-3147

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP-77643)

  • Svetlana V Komarova

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-288253)

  • Svetlana V Komarova

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Acknowledgements

Confocal imaging was performed at the RI-MUHC Molecular Imaging Platform (McGill University). Special thanks to Dr. M. Murshed (McGill University) for C2-OB cells and M. Rummler and C. Julien (Shriners Hospital for Children-Canada) for help with in vivo loading.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All procedures were approved by McGill's University's Animal Care Committee and complied with the ethical guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care. (protocols # 2012-7127 and 2016-7821)

Senior Editor

  1. Vivek Malhotra, The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Spain

Reviewing Editor

  1. Miguel A Valverde, Pompeu Fabra University, Spain

Publication history

  1. Received: April 23, 2018
  2. Accepted: September 28, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: October 16, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: October 29, 2018 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2018, Mikolajewicz et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 619
    Page views
  • 92
    Downloads
  • 0
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)