RNA World: Visualizing primer extension without enzymes
How life on Earth began remains one of the greatest scientific mysteries of our time. According to the phylogenetic record, all forms of life, both extant and extinct, are known to store genetic information in DNA and use proteins as enzymes to catalyze metabolic reactions (Joyce, 2002). However, considerable evidence exists to support the idea that modern life was preceded by simpler forms that were based on RNA rather than DNA (Atkins et al., 2011). This hypothetical period, commonly referred to as the RNA world, represents a time when RNA served as the sole genetic material and RNA enzymes (ribozymes) were used to catalyze reactions within primitive cells.
It is well established that RNA can store information and catalyze reactions, so it is possible to envision how modern life could have evolved from RNA-based life. However, it is less clear how the RNA world came into being. Researchers studying this problem have focused on the transition from chemistry to biology, which can be broken down into a number of individual steps, each with its own set of testable hypotheses (Szostak, 2012). Challenges include finding plausible prebiotic routes to the building blocks of life, discovering a mechanism for their assembly into primitive cells, and demonstrating the emergence of Darwinian behaviors through a process of RNA replication with heritable variation.
Recent research advances include the prebiotic synthesis of nucleotides, which are the building blocks of RNA (Powner et al., 2009), and the synthesis of RNA by RNA polymerase ribozymes (Horning and Joyce, 2016; Wang et al., 2011; Wochner et al., 2011). However, despite this progress, significant gaps remain in our knowledge of the RNA world. One major unanswered question is how RNA synthesis happened before the first appearance of an RNA polymerase ribozyme.
Non-enzymatic chemical synthesis of RNA offers a possible bridge between prebiotic chemistry (the molecules and chemical reactions that lead to the emergence of life) and the RNA world (Joyce, 1987). For over 30 years, researchers have used non-enzymatic, template-directed primer extension reactions to study the process of RNA synthesis in the absence of enzymes (proteins or RNA). This approach was thought to involve the stepwise addition of single nucleotides (also known as monomers) to an RNA primer that was base-paired to an RNA template. However, recent work has shown that the critical intermediate is not the monomer, as had been assumed, but a structure containing two nucleotides – called the dinucleotide intermediate (Walton and Szostak, 2016).
Preliminary structural insights into the functional role of the dinucleotide intermediate were initially obtained by X-ray crystallography using crystals of an RNA primer-template duplex bound to a structural analog of the predicted intermediate (Zhang et al., 2017). However, a full understanding of the process requires information about how the structure of the primer-template complex and the actual intermediate changes over time. Now, in eLife, Jack Szostak of the Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School and co-workers – Wen Zhang, Travis Walton, and Li Li – report that they have used time-resolved X-ray crystallography to reveal new details about non-enzymatic RNA synthesis (Zhang et al., 2018).
Zhang et al. first made crystals of the RNA primer-template complex with a non-reactive monomer. Activated monomers were then introduced into the crystal by a process of soaking, and as the activated monomers replaced the non-reactive monomers, primer extension began. The researchers used liquid nitrogen to freeze the samples at different times and X-ray crystallography to determine the structures with atomic resolution. This process provided a sequence of events that included all the steps of non-enzymatic RNA synthesis: the activated nucleotides bind to the template, pairs of nucleotides form the intermediate and, finally, a bond is formed between the RNA primer and the intermediate to extend the primer by one nucleotide – all without the involvement of any enzymes.
The observations made by Zhang et al. are nothing short of amazing and will likely influence the field of non-enzymatic RNA synthesis for years to come. In addition to revealing the reaction mechanism, the structures also explain why the primer reacts more readily with the activated intermediate than a template-bound monomer. Namely, pre-organizing the intermediate on the template reduces the distance between the primer and the adjacent nucleotide, which enables the primer to react more rapidly with the dinucleotide intermediate than it could with an individual monomer. While further questions persist, these findings serve as a monumental achievement and a stepping stone towards understanding the origin of the RNA world and the evolution of life on Earth.
References
-
BookRNA Worlds: From Life's Origins to Diversity in Gene RegulationCold Spring Harbor Laboratory.
-
Nonenzymatic template-directed synthesis of informational macromoleculesCold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 52:41–51.https://doi.org/10.1101/SQB.1987.052.01.008
-
The eightfold path to non-enzymatic RNA replicationJournal of Systems Chemistry 3:2–14.https://doi.org/10.1186/1759-2208-3-2
-
A highly reactive imidazolium-bridged dinucleotide intermediate in nonenzymatic RNA primer extensionJournal of the American Chemical Society 138:11996–12002.https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b07977
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2018, Chaput
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 1,977
- views
-
- 140
- downloads
-
- 0
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
The conformational ensemble and function of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are sensitive to their solution environment. The inherent malleability of disordered proteins, combined with the exposure of their residues, accounts for this sensitivity. One context in which IDPs play important roles that are concomitant with massive changes to the intracellular environment is during desiccation (extreme drying). The ability of organisms to survive desiccation has long been linked to the accumulation of high levels of cosolutes such as trehalose or sucrose as well as the enrichment of IDPs, such as late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins or cytoplasmic abundant heat-soluble (CAHS) proteins. Despite knowing that IDPs play important roles and are co-enriched alongside endogenous, species-specific cosolutes during desiccation, little is known mechanistically about how IDP-cosolute interactions influence desiccation tolerance. Here, we test the notion that the protective function of desiccation-related IDPs is enhanced through conformational changes induced by endogenous cosolutes. We find that desiccation-related IDPs derived from four different organisms spanning two LEA protein families and the CAHS protein family synergize best with endogenous cosolutes during drying to promote desiccation protection. Yet the structural parameters of protective IDPs do not correlate with synergy for either CAHS or LEA proteins. We further demonstrate that for CAHS, but not LEA proteins, synergy is related to self-assembly and the formation of a gel. Our results suggest that functional synergy between IDPs and endogenous cosolutes is a convergent desiccation protection strategy seen among different IDP families and organisms, yet the mechanisms underlying this synergy differ between IDP families.
-
- Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
- Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) have great potential to be used as alternatives to embryonic stem cells (hESCs) in regenerative medicine and disease modelling. In this study, we characterise the proteomes of multiple hiPSC and hESC lines derived from independent donors and find that while they express a near-identical set of proteins, they show consistent quantitative differences in the abundance of a subset of proteins. hiPSCs have increased total protein content, while maintaining a comparable cell cycle profile to hESCs, with increased abundance of cytoplasmic and mitochondrial proteins required to sustain high growth rates, including nutrient transporters and metabolic proteins. Prominent changes detected in proteins involved in mitochondrial metabolism correlated with enhanced mitochondrial potential, shown using high-resolution respirometry. hiPSCs also produced higher levels of secreted proteins, including growth factors and proteins involved in the inhibition of the immune system. The data indicate that reprogramming of fibroblasts to hiPSCs produces important differences in cytoplasmic and mitochondrial proteins compared to hESCs, with consequences affecting growth and metabolism. This study improves our understanding of the molecular differences between hiPSCs and hESCs, with implications for potential risks and benefits for their use in future disease modelling and therapeutic applications.