RNA World: Visualizing primer extension without enzymes
X-ray crystallography has been used to observe the synthesis of RNA in the absence of enzymes with atomic resolution.
- University of California, Irvine, United States
How life on Earth began remains one of the greatest scientific mysteries of our time. According to the phylogenetic record, all forms of life, both extant and extinct, are known to store genetic information in DNA and use proteins as enzymes to catalyze metabolic reactions (Joyce, 2002). However, considerable evidence exists to support the idea that modern life was preceded by simpler forms that were based on RNA rather than DNA (Atkins et al., 2011). This hypothetical period, commonly referred to as the RNA world, represents a time when RNA served as the sole genetic material and RNA enzymes (ribozymes) were used to catalyze reactions within primitive cells.
It is well established that RNA can store information and catalyze reactions, so it is possible to envision how modern life could have evolved from RNA-based life. However, it is less clear how the RNA world came into being. Researchers studying this problem have focused on the transition from chemistry to biology, which can be broken down into a number of individual steps, each with its own set of testable hypotheses (Szostak, 2012). Challenges include finding plausible prebiotic routes to the building blocks of life, discovering a mechanism for their assembly into primitive cells, and demonstrating the emergence of Darwinian behaviors through a process of RNA replication with heritable variation.
Recent research advances include the prebiotic synthesis of nucleotides, which are the building blocks of RNA (Powner et al., 2009), and the synthesis of RNA by RNA polymerase ribozymes (Horning and Joyce, 2016; Wang et al., 2011; Wochner et al., 2011). However, despite this progress, significant gaps remain in our knowledge of the RNA world. One major unanswered question is how RNA synthesis happened before the first appearance of an RNA polymerase ribozyme.
Non-enzymatic chemical synthesis of RNA offers a possible bridge between prebiotic chemistry (the molecules and chemical reactions that lead to the emergence of life) and the RNA world (Joyce, 1987). For over 30 years, researchers have used non-enzymatic, template-directed primer extension reactions to study the process of RNA synthesis in the absence of enzymes (proteins or RNA). This approach was thought to involve the stepwise addition of single nucleotides (also known as monomers) to an RNA primer that was base-paired to an RNA template. However, recent work has shown that the critical intermediate is not the monomer, as had been assumed, but a structure containing two nucleotides – called the dinucleotide intermediate (Walton and Szostak, 2016).
Preliminary structural insights into the functional role of the dinucleotide intermediate were initially obtained by X-ray crystallography using crystals of an RNA primer-template duplex bound to a structural analog of the predicted intermediate (Zhang et al., 2017). However, a full understanding of the process requires information about how the structure of the primer-template complex and the actual intermediate changes over time. Now, in eLife, Jack Szostak of the Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School and co-workers – Wen Zhang, Travis Walton, and Li Li – report that they have used time-resolved X-ray crystallography to reveal new details about non-enzymatic RNA synthesis (Zhang et al., 2018).
Zhang et al. first made crystals of the RNA primer-template complex with a non-reactive monomer. Activated monomers were then introduced into the crystal by a process of soaking, and as the activated monomers replaced the non-reactive monomers, primer extension began. The researchers used liquid nitrogen to freeze the samples at different times and X-ray crystallography to determine the structures with atomic resolution. This process provided a sequence of events that included all the steps of non-enzymatic RNA synthesis: the activated nucleotides bind to the template, pairs of nucleotides form the intermediate and, finally, a bond is formed between the RNA primer and the intermediate to extend the primer by one nucleotide – all without the involvement of any enzymes.
The observations made by Zhang et al. are nothing short of amazing and will likely influence the field of non-enzymatic RNA synthesis for years to come. In addition to revealing the reaction mechanism, the structures also explain why the primer reacts more readily with the activated intermediate than a template-bound monomer. Namely, pre-organizing the intermediate on the template reduces the distance between the primer and the adjacent nucleotide, which enables the primer to react more rapidly with the dinucleotide intermediate than it could with an individual monomer. While further questions persist, these findings serve as a monumental achievement and a stepping stone towards understanding the origin of the RNA world and the evolution of life on Earth.
References
-
BookRNA Worlds: From Life's Origins to Diversity in Gene RegulationCold Spring Harbor Laboratory.
-
Nonenzymatic template-directed synthesis of informational macromoleculesCold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 52:41–51.https://doi.org/10.1101/SQB.1987.052.01.008
-
The eightfold path to non-enzymatic RNA replicationJournal of Systems Chemistry 3:2–14.https://doi.org/10.1186/1759-2208-3-2
-
A highly reactive imidazolium-bridged dinucleotide intermediate in nonenzymatic RNA primer extensionJournal of the American Chemical Society 138:11996–12002.https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b07977
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
- Version of Record published: May 31, 2018 (version 1)
Copyright
© 2018, Chaput
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 1,938
- views
-
- 136
- downloads
-
- 0
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
RNA World: Visualizing primer extension without enzymes
eLife 7:e37926.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37926
Further reading
-
- Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
Transporter research primarily relies on the canonical substrates of well-established transporters. This approach has limitations when studying transporters for the low-abundant micromolecules, such as micronutrients, and may not reveal physiological functions of the transporters. While d-serine, a trace enantiomer of serine in the circulation, was discovered as an emerging biomarker of kidney function, its transport mechanisms in the periphery remain unknown. Here, using a multi-hierarchical approach from body fluids to molecules, combining multi-omics, cell-free synthetic biochemistry, and ex vivo transport analyses, we have identified two types of renal d-serine transport systems. We revealed that the small amino acid transporter ASCT2 serves as a d-serine transporter previously uncharacterized in the kidney and discovered d-serine as a non-canonical substrate of the sodium-coupled monocarboxylate transporters (SMCTs). These two systems are physiologically complementary, but ASCT2 dominates the role in the pathological condition. Our findings not only shed light on renal d-serine transport, but also clarify the importance of non-canonical substrate transport. This study provides a framework for investigating multiple transport systems of various trace micromolecules under physiological conditions and in multifactorial diseases.
-
- Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
- Cell Biology
Mediator of ERBB2-driven Cell Motility 1 (MEMO1) is an evolutionary conserved protein implicated in many biological processes; however, its primary molecular function remains unknown. Importantly, MEMO1 is overexpressed in many types of cancer and was shown to modulate breast cancer metastasis through altered cell motility. To better understand the function of MEMO1 in cancer cells, we analyzed genetic interactions of MEMO1 using gene essentiality data from 1028 cancer cell lines and found multiple iron-related genes exhibiting genetic relationships with MEMO1. We experimentally confirmed several interactions between MEMO1 and iron-related proteins in living cells, most notably, transferrin receptor 2 (TFR2), mitoferrin-2 (SLC25A28), and the global iron response regulator IRP1 (ACO1). These interactions indicate that cells with high MEMO1 expression levels are hypersensitive to the disruptions in iron distribution. Our data also indicate that MEMO1 is involved in ferroptosis and is linked to iron supply to mitochondria. We have found that purified MEMO1 binds iron with high affinity under redox conditions mimicking intracellular environment and solved MEMO1 structures in complex with iron and copper. Our work reveals that the iron coordination mode in MEMO1 is very similar to that of iron-containing extradiol dioxygenases, which also display a similar structural fold. We conclude that MEMO1 is an iron-binding protein that modulates iron homeostasis in cancer cells.
