Intrinsically regulated learning is modulated by synaptic dopamine signaling

  1. Pablo Ripollés  Is a corresponding author
  2. Laura Ferreri
  3. Ernest Mas-Herrero
  4. Helena Alicart
  5. Alba Gómez-Andrés
  6. Josep Marco-Pallares
  7. Rosa Maria Antonijoan
  8. Toemme Noesselt  Is a corresponding author
  9. Marta Valle
  10. Jordi Riba
  11. Antoni Rodriguez-Fornells  Is a corresponding author
  1. New York University, United States
  2. L'Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Spain
  3. McGill University, Canada
  4. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
  5. Otto-von-Guericke University, Germany
  6. Sant Pau Institute of Biomedical Research, Spain

Abstract

We recently provided evidence that an intrinsic reward-related signal-triggered by successful learning in absence of any external feedback-modulated the entrance of new information into long-term memory via the activation of the dopaminergic midbrain, hippocampus, and ventral striatum (the SN/VTA-Hippocampal loop; Ripollés et al., 2016). Here, we used a double-blind, within-subject randomized pharmacological intervention to test whether this learning process is indeed dopamine-dependent. A group of healthy individuals completed three behavioural sessions of a language-learning task after the intake of different pharmacological treatments: a dopaminergic precursor, a dopamine receptor antagonist or a placebo. Results show that the pharmacological intervention modulated behavioral measures of both learning and pleasantness, inducing memory benefits after 24 hours only for those participants with a high sensitivity to reward. These results provide causal evidence for a dopamine-dependent mechanism instrumental in intrinsically regulated learning and further suggest that subject-specific reward sensitivity drastically alters learning success.

Data availability

Data is available via Dryad (https://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.g5f7v1j)

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Pablo Ripollés

    Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    pabloripollesvidal@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8463-3723
  2. Laura Ferreri

    Cognition and Brain Plasticity Group, L'Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Ernest Mas-Herrero

    Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Helena Alicart

    Cognition and Brain Plasticity Group, L'Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Alba Gómez-Andrés

    Cognition and Brain Plasticity Group, L'Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Josep Marco-Pallares

    Cognition and Brain Plasticity Group, L'Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Rosa Maria Antonijoan

    Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Toemme Noesselt

    Department of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
    For correspondence
    toemme@med.ovgu.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9611-9713
  9. Marta Valle

    Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Jordi Riba

    Human Neuropsychopharmacology Group, Sant Pau Institute of Biomedical Research, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Antoni Rodriguez-Fornells

    Cognition and Brain Plasticity Group, L'Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain
    For correspondence
    antoni.rodriguez@icrea.cat
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Ministerio de Industria, Economía y Competitividad (PSI2011-29219)

  • Antoni Rodriguez-Fornells

Ministerio de Industria, Economía y Competitividad (AP2010-4179)

  • Pablo Ripollés

Morelly-Rotary Postdoctoral Fellowship

  • Laura Ferreri

Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad (CP04/00 121)

  • Marta Valle

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG-SFB-779/A15)

  • Toemme Noesselt

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: This study was performed according to local ethics and to the Declaration of Helsinki. It was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hospital Sant Pau and by the Spanish Medicines and Medical Devices Agency (EudraCT 2016-000801-35). All participants gave informed written consent and received compensation for their participation in the study according to Spanish legislation.

Copyright

© 2018, Ripollés et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,486
    views
  • 359
    downloads
  • 43
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Pablo Ripollés
  2. Laura Ferreri
  3. Ernest Mas-Herrero
  4. Helena Alicart
  5. Alba Gómez-Andrés
  6. Josep Marco-Pallares
  7. Rosa Maria Antonijoan
  8. Toemme Noesselt
  9. Marta Valle
  10. Jordi Riba
  11. Antoni Rodriguez-Fornells
(2018)
Intrinsically regulated learning is modulated by synaptic dopamine signaling
eLife 7:e38113.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.38113

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.38113

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Devanshi Piyush Shah, Pallavi Raj Sharma ... Arnab Barik
    Research Article

    Stress is a potent modulator of pain. Specifically, acute stress due to physical restraint induces stress-induced analgesia (SIA). However, where and how acute stress and pain pathways interface in the brain are poorly understood. Here, we describe how the dorsal lateral septum (dLS), a forebrain limbic nucleus, facilitates SIA through its downstream targets in the lateral hypothalamic area (LHA) of mice. Taking advantage of transsynaptic viral-genetic, optogenetic, and chemogenetic techniques, we show that the dLS→LHA circuitry is sufficient to drive analgesia and is required for SIA. Furthermore, our results reveal that the dLS→LHA pathway is opioid-dependent and modulates pain through the pro-nociceptive neurons in the rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM). Remarkably, we found that the inhibitory dLS neurons are recruited specifically when the mice struggle to escape under restraint and, in turn, inhibit excitatory LHA neurons. As a result, the RVM neurons downstream of LHA are disengaged, thus suppressing nociception. Together, we delineate a poly-synaptic pathway that can transform escape behavior in mice under restraint to acute stress into analgesia.

    1. Neuroscience
    Vincent Huson, Wade G Regehr
    Research Article

    Unipolar brush cells (UBCs) are excitatory interneurons in the cerebellar cortex that receive mossy fiber (MF) inputs and excite granule cells. The UBC population responds to brief burst activation of MFs with a continuum of temporal transformations, but it is not known how UBCs transform the diverse range of MF input patterns that occur in vivo. Here, we use cell-attached recordings from UBCs in acute cerebellar slices to examine responses to MF firing patterns that are based on in vivo recordings. We find that MFs evoke a continuum of responses in the UBC population, mediated by three different types of glutamate receptors that each convey a specialized component. AMPARs transmit timing information for single stimuli at up to 5 spikes/s, and for very brief bursts. A combination of mGluR2/3s (inhibitory) and mGluR1s (excitatory) mediates a continuum of delayed, and broadened responses to longer bursts, and to sustained high frequency activation. Variability in the mGluR2/3 component controls the time course of the onset of firing, and variability in the mGluR1 component controls the duration of prolonged firing. We conclude that the combination of glutamate receptor types allows each UBC to simultaneously convey different aspects of MF firing. These findings establish that UBCs are highly flexible circuit elements that provide diverse temporal transformations that are well suited to contribute to specialized processing in different regions of the cerebellar cortex.