Bone-Targeting Drugs: From vesicle to cytosol
Drugs called bisphosphonates are used to treat a range of bone diseases, but how do they reach the enzymes that are their target?
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Australia
Despite its appearance, bone is a highly metabolic and dynamic tissue that is composed of a vast network of cells called osteocytes that are embedded in a matrix made mostly of collagen and various salts of calcium and phosphate. These osteocytes sense regions of damaged or weakened bone, and 'instruct' bone-destroying cells (called osteoclasts) and bone-forming cells (osteoblasts) to, respectively, remove old bone and deposit new bone (Figure 1). Hence, like a team of road-repairers, the osteocytes, osteoclasts and osteoblasts work together to repair bone and maintain our skeleton in good health (Crockett et al., 2011).
Figure 1
How bisphosphonates act in bone.
(A) Old and damaged bone is constantly being broken down by cells called osteoclasts in a process called resorption (top left), while new bone is deposited by cells called osteoblasts (top right). Cells called osteocytes (bottom) influence both of these processes through a spidery system of tiny canals called canaliculi. After entering the circulation, the drug bisphosphonate (green) binds very effectively to calcium ions on the bone mineral surface. During resorption, the bisphosphonate on the bone surface is released into the acidic extracellular space beneath the osteoclast. (B) The bisphosphonate in the extracellular space is engulfed into osteoclasts via a process called endocytosis (1). The resulting endosomes mature to form structures called lysosomes, and two proteins, SLC37A3 and ATRAID, then interact in the membrane of the lysosome to allow the bisphosphonate to enter the cytosol (2). Once in the cytosol, the nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates inhibit an enzyme called FDPS and prevent the osteoclast from breaking down bone (3). BP: bisphosphonate; FDPS: farnesyl diphosphate synthase; SLC37A3: solute carrier family 37 member A3.
In young adult life there is usually a balance between the amount of old bone broken down and the amount of new bone formed by this repair process, so there is no net gain or loss of bone mass. However, in diseases that affect the skeleton, such as post-menopausal osteoporosis or cancers growing in bone, this delicate balance can be disturbed by osteoclasts being over-active, which leads to excessive bone destruction and fractures. Drugs called bisphosphonates – which inhibit osteoclasts – have been used for more than three decades to treat such diseases and protect the skeleton from potentially catastrophic bone loss, although researchers still do not fully understand how they work. Now, in eLife, Erin O'Shea of Harvard University and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) and colleagues – including Zhou Yu as first author – report the answer to one of the remaining questions about these drugs (Yu et al., 2018).
Bisphosphonates are synthetic molecules that closely resemble the chemical structure of pyrophosphate, which is a natural by-product of numerous metabolic reactions. Importantly, bisphosphonates have two negatively-charged phosphonate groups that enable them to bind calcium ions very effectively, and hence to localize rapidly to any exposed calcium on the bone surface (Rogers et al., 2011). The mechanisms used by bisphosphonates to inhibit osteoclasts remained a mystery for several decades after they were first used in the clinic, but this did not stop the development of improved versions of the drugs (Russell et al., 2008). Eventually it was discovered that nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (N-BPs), which are now widely used to treat osteoporosis and other bone diseases, work by inhibiting an enzyme called FDPS inside the osteoclasts (Luckman et al., 1998; Bergstrom et al., 2000; Dunford et al., 2001). The N-BP molecules displace the lipid substrates that the FDPS enzyme usually acts on, locking the enzyme in an inactive state (Kavanagh et al., 2006; Rondeau et al., 2006). Without FDPS activity, osteoclasts are no longer able to degrade bone (Rogers et al., 2011).
However, one question remained: how do the N-BPs and other bisphosphonates actually reach the FDPS enzyme, which is in the cytosol of the osteoclasts? There was little or no evidence that a receptor on the plasma membrane was involved (Thompson et al., 2006). Studies with fluorescently-tagged bisphosphonates showed that they first entered the osteoclasts via endocytosis – a process that involves the cell membrane folding inwards and then pinching off to create a vesicle inside the cell (Coxon et al., 2008). But how do the drugs leave these vesicles – which are enclosed by a membrane – to enter the cytosol? Bisphosphonate molecules have a large negative charge, which rules out passive diffusion across the vesicle membrane, which in turn suggests the possibility of a hitherto unidentified transport mechanism (Thompson et al., 2006).
Yu et al. – who are based at Harvard, HHMI, UCSF, MIT, the Broad, Koch and Whitehead Institutes, and Washington University – report that they have identified a protein called SLC37A3 that is required for the release of N-BP molecules from vesicles into the cytosol. Using a CRISPR-based approach to screen for genes that, when missing, confer resistance to bisphosphonates, they identified SLC37A3 as the gene with the strongest effect. Although the exact function of the SLC37A3 protein remains to be clarified, related members of this protein family are involved in the transport of charged molecules across membranes (Cappello et al., 2018).
Yu et al. found that SLC37A3 interacts and co-localizes with a protein called ATRAID at the vesicle membrane (Figure 1). Importantly, vesicles isolated from cells that did not express SLC37A3 or ATRAID appeared unable to release N-BP molecules, and these cells were much less sensitive to the pharmacological effect of N-BPs.
This new transport mechanism identified by Yu et al. raises interesting questions about how the SLC37A3/ATRAID complex specifically recognizes N-BP molecules, and how it transports them across the membrane of the vesicle. It will also be worthwhile to determine whether differences in the expression of SLC37A3 or ATRAID account for the different sensitivity of osteoclasts and other cell types to N-BP molecules, or whether variants in these genes affect the clinical responsiveness of patients to these drugs. Nevertheless, these elegant studies explain how negatively-charged N-BP molecules can gain access to the cell cytosol after endocytosis and, as a result, go on to benefit huge numbers of patients with potentially devastating bone diseases.
References
-
Alendronate is a specific, nanomolar inhibitor of farnesyl diphosphate synthaseArchives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 373:231–241.https://doi.org/10.1006/abbi.1999.1502
-
Bone remodelling at a glanceJournal of Cell Science 124:991–998.https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.063032
-
Structure-activity relationships for inhibition of farnesyl diphosphate synthase in vitro and inhibition of bone resorption in vivo by nitrogen-containing bisphosphonatesJournal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 296:235–242.
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
- Version of Record published: June 27, 2018 (version 1)
Copyright
© 2018, Rogers et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 1,205
- views
-
- 133
- downloads
-
- 6
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Bone-Targeting Drugs: From vesicle to cytosol
eLife 7:e38847.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.38847
Further reading
-
- Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
- Neuroscience
Amyloid β (Aβ) peptides accumulating in the brain are proposed to trigger Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, molecular cascades underlying their toxicity are poorly defined. Here, we explored a novel hypothesis for Aβ42 toxicity that arises from its proven affinity for γ-secretases. We hypothesized that the reported increases in Aβ42, particularly in the endolysosomal compartment, promote the establishment of a product feedback inhibitory mechanism on γ-secretases, and thereby impair downstream signaling events. We conducted kinetic analyses of γ-secretase activity in cell-free systems in the presence of Aβ, as well as cell-based and ex vivo assays in neuronal cell lines, neurons, and brain synaptosomes to assess the impact of Aβ on γ-secretases. We show that human Aβ42 peptides, but neither murine Aβ42 nor human Aβ17–42 (p3), inhibit γ-secretases and trigger accumulation of unprocessed substrates in neurons, including C-terminal fragments (CTFs) of APP, p75, and pan-cadherin. Moreover, Aβ42 treatment dysregulated cellular homeostasis, as shown by the induction of p75-dependent neuronal death in two distinct cellular systems. Our findings raise the possibility that pathological elevations in Aβ42 contribute to cellular toxicity via the γ-secretase inhibition, and provide a novel conceptual framework to address Aβ toxicity in the context of γ-secretase-dependent homeostatic signaling.
-
- Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
- Plant Biology
Transmembrane signaling by plant receptor kinases (RKs) has long been thought to involve reciprocal trans-phosphorylation of their intracellular kinase domains. The fact that many of these are pseudokinase domains, however, suggests that additional mechanisms must govern RK signaling activation. Non-catalytic signaling mechanisms of protein kinase domains have been described in metazoans, but information is scarce for plants. Recently, a non-catalytic function was reported for the leucine-rich repeat (LRR)-RK subfamily XIIa member EFR (elongation factor Tu receptor) and phosphorylation-dependent conformational changes were proposed to regulate signaling of RKs with non-RD kinase domains. Here, using EFR as a model, we describe a non-catalytic activation mechanism for LRR-RKs with non-RD kinase domains. EFR is an active kinase, but a kinase-dead variant retains the ability to enhance catalytic activity of its co-receptor kinase BAK1/SERK3 (brassinosteroid insensitive 1-associated kinase 1/somatic embryogenesis receptor kinase 3). Applying hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) analysis and designing homology-based intragenic suppressor mutations, we provide evidence that the EFR kinase domain must adopt its active conformation in order to activate BAK1 allosterically, likely by supporting αC-helix positioning in BAK1. Our results suggest a conformational toggle model for signaling, in which BAK1 first phosphorylates EFR in the activation loop to stabilize its active conformation, allowing EFR in turn to allosterically activate BAK1.
