The vigorous motion of the intracellular fluid, known as cytoplasmic streaming, is caused by cytoskeletal filaments and molecular motors. In Drosophila oocytes this cellular-scale fluid motion, which occurs over multiple time scales, is responsible for efficient mixing of ooplasm and nurse-cell cytoplasm, for long-distance transport of intracellular material, and for proper patterning of the oocyte (Quinlan, 2016; Palacios and St Johnston, 2002; Lu et al., 2016). Although cytoplasmic streaming is known for centuries (Berthold, 1886) and kinesin-1 molecular motors and microtubules (MTs) have been identified as the components responsible for ooplasmic streaming (Quinlan, 2016; Palacios and St Johnston, 2002; Gutzeit, 1986; Serbus et al., 2005), there is considerable debate about the aetiological mechanisms for force generation. Namely, the constituent events, their order of occurrences, and their characteristic durations, which ultimately give streaming are not understood. Some studies suggest that streaming is caused by the hydrodynamic entrainment of motor-transported cargos (Monteith et al., 2016; Theurkauf et al., 1992), others that it is due to the motor-mediated sliding of adjacent MTs (Jolly et al., 2010; Lu et al., 2016; Winding et al., 2016).

Motor-mediated MT sliding occurs because molecular motors crosslink adjacent MTs and use ATP (adenosine triphosphate) molecules as fuel to 'walk’ on them unidirectionally in the direction of MT polarity (Vale and Milligan, 2000). This leads to significantly different active dynamics of MT pairs that are polar-aligned and antialigned (Gao et al., 2015; Blackwell et al., 2016; Ravichandran et al., 2017): Motors that crosslink polar-aligned MTs hold the polar-aligned MTs together, generating an effective attraction (Ravichandran et al., 2017). Active motors crosslink and slide antialigned MTs. The motors thus act as force dipoles that break nematic symmetry in MT solutions. In the absence of permanent crosslinkers, which are known to render the active network contractile (Belmonte et al., 2017), this ultimately can cause large-scale flows in the cytoskeleton (Jolly et al., 2010; Lu et al., 2016). Several approaches to analyse the collective motion, such as the displacement correlation function or the analysis of velocity distributions, are inspired by studies on collective motion of self-propelled agents (Duman et al., 2018; Needleman and Dogic, 2017; Zöttl and Stark, 2016; Bechinger et al., 2016; Elgeti et al., 2015).

In vivo, individual MTs are stationary most of the time before suddenly undergoing a burst of long-distance travel with velocities reaching ${\displaystyle \approx 10}$ μm/s (Jolly et al., 2010). Also, fluorescence microscopy has shown the formation of long extended arms for an initially circular photoconverted area (Jolly et al., 2010). A possible mechanism for such a behaviour is illustrated in Figure 1: In the absence of active motor stresses, MTs in polar-aligned bundles diffuse slowly. When they encounter antialigned MTs, they can be actively and rapidly transported away from a polar-aligned bundle to another polar-aligned bundle where they again exhibit slow diffusive behaviour. These transitions between slow-bundling motion and fast-streaming bursts can give rise to Levy flight-like MT dynamics (Chen et al., 2015).

Figure 1

Download asset Open asset

In vitro and in silico, MT-motor model systems allow a systematical study of the interactions between the basic components of the cytoskeleton. The systems often contain only a small number of different components and are usually also restricted in other respects, such as a reduced dimensionality or a lack of polymerization and depolymerization of the filaments. For example, a very well studied model system contains MTs and kinesin complexes at an oil-water interface (Sanchez et al., 2012; DeCamp et al., 2015), where poly(ethylene glycol)-induced depletion interaction both keeps the MTs at the interface and induces bundle formation. In contrast, coarse-grained computer simulations in 2D are used to study both structure formation on the bundle scale (DeCamp et al., 2015) as well as single-filament dynamics, for example to quantify the effect of motor properties or of presence of passive crosslinkers (Ravichandran et al., 2017; Blackwell et al., 2016; Gao et al., 2015; Belmonte et al., 2017). Because such model systems are simpler than the cytoskeleton in biological cells, they are especially suited to study specific mechanisms in detail.

Cytoplasmic streaming is a complex multi-scale phenomenon that cannot be fully understood using antialigned filaments alone. The importance of a specific mechanism can only be studied in vivo for a specific system. This so-called ’top-down’ approach has been remarkably successful in describing streaming in the aquatic alga Chara coranilla (Woodhouse and Goldstein, 2013) and Dropsophila oocytes (Khuc Trong et al., 2015). In the former case, theoretical models have showed the importance of coupling hydrodynamic entrainment and microfilament dynamics to capture pattern formation relevant for streaming. In the latter case, simulations mimicking streaming in Drosophila oocytes have emphasised the importance of cortical MT nucleation in anteroposterior axis definition. It was shown that nucleation of MTs from the periphery is important to induce cytoplasmic flow patterns and to localise mRNAs in specific areas of the cell.

Microtubule-motor systems are intrinsically out of equilibrium, which has been shown for example by monitoring the dynamics of motors that walk along MTs (Schnitzer and Block, 1997) and by the violation of the fluctuation-dissipation theorem for tracer particles embedded into acto-myosin systems (Mizuno et al., 2007). Therefore, simulation approaches for systems of passive MTs at equilibrium have to be augmented with motor activity. Brownian dynamics simulations with MTs and explicit motors have been used to study network contractility (Belmonte et al., 2017), polarity-sorting, and stress generation at high MT densities (Gao et al., 2015), persistent motion of active vortices in confinement (Head et al., 2011a) and anomalous transport in active gels (Head et al., 2011b). Recent simulations for the defect dynamics in extensile MT systems have been performed on the coarse-grained level of MT bundles (DeCamp et al., 2015).

We employ a ’bottom-up’ approach, where we study MT streaming induced by MT sliding using a model system. In order to characterize the dynamics in the system, we use a coarse-grained model to investigate whether a purely polarity-dependent MT-MT sliding mechanism, in the absence of any hydrodynamic forces, can be sufficient to capture large-scale streaming in bulk. We identify five distinct processes that comprise streaming with their characteristic times for various MT activities and surface fractions: (1) motor-driven MT sliding, (2) polarity-inversion, (3) maximal activity, (4) collective migration, and (5) rotation. Although various experimental studies have provided high spatial resolution to describe streaming phenomena (Quinlan, 2016), MT dynamics for streaming is still poorly understood. Inspired by the biological mechanism for MT-MT sliding, we use computer simulations to provide a novel temporal perspective into streaming for a wide range of time scales, which has not been achieved so far due to limitations of experimental techniques.

In order to capture cellular-scale dynamics in computer simulations, modelling individual motors along with MTs, although done before in several studies (Mizuno et al., 2007; Hiraiwa and Salbreux, 2016; Ronceray et al., 2016; Head et al., 2014; Blackwell et al., 2016; Gao et al., 2015; Freedman et al., 2017), can prove to be unwieldy due to the wide ranges of length and time scales involved. The sizes of individual kinesin molecules that crosslink and slide MTs are three orders of magnitude smaller than that of the cells within which they bring about large-scale dynamics. Also, there is a large disparity between the residence time of a cross-linking motor (10 seconds) (Toprak et al., 2009), and the characteristic time scale of motor-induced MT streaming or pattern formation in active gels (1 hr) (Ganguly et al., 2012; Jolly et al., 2010; Lu et al., 2016; DeCamp et al., 2015). In order to capture motor-induced cellular-level phenomena, such as organelle distribution, cytoplasmic streaming, and active cytoskeleton-induced lipid bilayer fluctuations, a coarse-grained description of cytoskeletal activity seems therefore appropriate.

Effective molecular motors

Various theoretical studies have strived to circumvent short time and length scales involved in cytoskeletal dynamics, such as diffusion and active motion of individual motors (Kruse and Jülicher, 2000; Kruse et al., 2005; Swaminathan et al., 2010; Jia et al., 2008; Aranson and Tsimring, 2005; Aranson and Tsimring, 2006; Salbreux et al., 2009; Córdoba et al., 2015). For example, in the phenomenological flux-force model the motion of MTs in one dimension occurs solely due to the orientation of neighbouring MTs (Kruse et al., 2004; Kruse et al., 2001). Many two-dimensional models, where MTs are modelled as stiff, polar rods of equal length, take motors into account using a Maxwellian model of inelastic interactions between the rods (Aranson and Tsimring, 2005; Aranson and Tsimring, 2006; Jia et al., 2008; Swaminathan et al., 2010). These probabilistic collision rules result in the alignment of rods. Although these models capture the self-organization of MT-motor mixtures into stable patterns of vortices, asters, and smectic bundles, the collision rule approaches do not reproduce the sliding of antialigned MTs described in Figure 2.

Figure 2

Download asset Open asset

Sliding of antialigned MTs due to kinesin motors has been identified as key ingredient for cytoplasmic advection in vivo (Jolly et al., 2010; Winding et al., 2016; Lu et al., 2016). Instead of modelling individual motors, in our model MT motion manifests itself as a result of a distribution of motors in an ensemble of orientations between neighbouring MT pairs. Hence, we coarse-grain MT-motor interactions using an effective motor potential that gives a contribution to $U_{\mathrm{mot}}$. A motor bond can form when the crosslinked beads are antialigned, that is the angle that a motor bond vector ${\mathbf{𝐦}}_{ij}$ makes with the unit orientation vector is acute on both MTs simultaneously, see Figure 2,

(5) ${\displaystyle {\mathbf{p}}_i\cdot {\mathbf{m}}_{ij}>0\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}{\mathbf{p}}_j\cdot {\mathbf{m}}_{ij}<0.}$

Here the orientation vector assigned to bead $i$ on an MT is ${\mathbf{𝐩}}_i=({\mathbf{𝐫}}_{i+1}-{\mathbf{𝐫}}_i)/|{\mathbf{𝐫}}_{i+1}-{\mathbf{𝐫}}_i|$, and the extension of a motor that crosslinks MTs $i$ and $j$ is ${\mathbf{𝐦}}_{ij}(s_i,s_j)={\mathbf{𝐫}}_{\mathrm{i}}(s_i)-{\mathbf{𝐫}}_{\mathrm{j}}(s_j)$, with the motor heads bound at the positions $s_i$ and $s_j$ along the contour of the MTs. This is similar to the activity-inducing scenario a dimeric or tetrameric motor (Ravichandran et al., 2017) encounters when it crosslinks a pair of antialigned MTs, that is the motor arms are oriented towards the $+$ direction of either crosslinked MT.

Each effective motor is a harmonic spring of equilibrium bond length $d_{\mathrm{eq}}=\sigma$ and stiffness $k_{\mathrm{m}}$ that exists for one simulation time step (Although the force for each motor lasts for a single time step, this duration is not a characteristic time for the motor. Our model describes continuum propulsion forces on MTs imposed by motors. This is supported by Figure 3; Figure 3—figure supplement 1, which shows that the MT parallel velocity is proportional to the fraction of time that motors are active, independent of the duration of each active phase.). The system is inherently out of equilibrium because the motor bonds occur dependent on the relative orientation of neighboring MTs, and exist and exert forces only for short times, mimicking the ratchet model for molecular motors (Jülicher et al., 1997). The potential for a motor with extension $m_{ij}=|{\mathbf{𝐦}}_{ij}|$ is

(6) ${\displaystyle U_{\mathrm{m}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{t}}(m_{ij})=\{\begin{array}{ll}\frac{k_m}{2}(m_{ij}-d_{\mathrm{e}\mathrm{q}}{)}^2& m_{ij}\le d_{\mathrm{t}}\\ 0& m_{ij}>d_{\mathrm{t}}\end{array},}$

and the motor binding rate is

(7) $k_{\mathrm{on}}(m_{ij})=p_{\mathrm{a}}\exp \left(-\frac{U_{\mathrm{mot}}(m_{ij})}{k_{\mathrm{B}}T}\right).$

Here, $p_{\mathrm{a}}$ controls the probability that an antialigned motor binds (Similarly, we can also implement motors between polar-aligned MTs). Motors bind only for extensions $m_{ij}<d_t=2\sigma$, when $k_{\mathrm{on}}/p_{\mathrm{a}}>\exp (-1/2)$. This also corresponds well to the experimentally measured length of a kinesin motor (Kerssemakers et al., 2006). The motor model described here for two dimensions is analogous to the phenomenological model for one dimension described in Kruse and Jülicher (2000); these one-dimensional calculations show that the relative velocity between two antialigned MTs is a linear function of $p_{\mathrm{a}}$ and $k_{\mathrm{m}}$. Similarly, a kinesin-5 induced effective torque between MTs has been calculated to study forces in the mitotic spindle (Winters et al., 2018).

We characterise several distinct processes comprising the phenomenology of active MT motion that arise because of the sliding of adjacent, antialigned MT pairs.

Regimes of MT dynamics

Figure 3 provides an overview of the processes that comprise MT streaming. The fundamental sliding mechanism, which is imposed through the effective motor potential, is the process which occurs at the sliding time ${\tau }_{N,min}$. The three processes that occur on longer time scales are characterised by the polarity-inversion time ${\tau }_{Q/2}$, the activity time ${\tau }^{*}$, and the collective-migration time ${\tau }_{N,\max }$. The active-rotation time ${\tau }_r$ characterises the time when an active MT reaches the end of a polar-ordered domain and changes its orientation.

Figure 3 with 10 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Figure 3—source data 1

Source data for graphs shown in Figure 3 (d,e).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.39694.015

Download elife-39694-fig3-data1-v2.zip

Figure 3(a) and Video 1 show multiple, small, polar-aligned MT domains with dynamic interfaces of antialigned MTs between them for MT surface fraction $\varphi =0.3$ and motor activity $p_{\mathrm{a}}=1$. Note that choosing different values for $\varphi$ and $p_{\mathrm{a}}$ can have a pronounced effect on the structure of the system (Figure 3—figure supplement 2). The domains are formed by polarity sorting (Wollrab et al., 2018) and are in dynamic equilibrium due to MTs that perpetually enter and leave them, see Figure 3(b) and Video 2. Tracing the individual trajectories shows that MT dynamics consists of a fast streaming mode and a slow diffusion mode, see Figure 3(c) and Video 3. Uncorrelated displacements in time correspond to slow diffusion within a polar-aligned domain of MTs, and correlated displacements correspond to fast, ballistic streaming at interfaces between domains. This leads to a highly dynamic overall MT structure illustrated by Video 4. At steady state, the length of antialigned interfaces and the size of polar-aligned domains remain constant. The polarity-inversion time ${\tau }_{Q/2}$ characterises the duration that MTs stay in polar-aligned bundles or in antialigned streams.

Video 1

Download asset

Video 2

Download asset

Video 3

Download asset

Video 4

Download asset

Figure 3(d) shows the MT mean squared displacement

(8) ${\displaystyle \mathrm{M}\mathrm{S}\mathrm{D}(\tau )\equiv ⟨|{\mathbf{d}}_i(t,\tau ){|}^2⟩\equiv ⟨|{\mathbf{r}}_i(t+\tau )-{\mathbf{r}}_i(t){|}^2⟩}$

for MT surface fraction $\varphi =0.3$ and various motor probabilities (We use $m=1$ and $\gamma =1$ in simulation units. The single MT center-of-mass dynamics is overdamped for times $t/{\tau }_R>2m/\gamma {\tau }_R\approx {10}^{-2}$, which is shorter than the shortest time scale of interest shown in Figure 3(d).). Here, ${\mathbf{𝐫}}_i(t)$ is the center-of-mass position vector of MT $i$ at time $t$, and ${\mathbf{𝐝}}_i(t,\tau )$ is the displacement vector of the center-of-mass of MT $i$ between $t$ and $t+\tau$. For passive MTs, $p_{\mathrm{a}}=0.0$, the ballistic regime $\mathrm{MSD}\propto {\tau }^2$ at short times due to inertia is followed by a diffusive regime $\mathrm{MSD}\propto \tau$ where the MT velocity is dissipated by the environment. For all simulations at finite $p_{\mathrm{a}}$, we find a superdiffusive regime ${\displaystyle {10}^{-1}\lesssim \tau /{\tau }_R\lesssim {10}^1}$ with $\mathrm{MSD}\propto {\tau }^{\alpha }$ and ${\displaystyle \alpha >1}$ with active ballistic motion. Finally, we find a diffusive regime at long times with an active diffusion coefficient that is much higher than for passive Brownian diffusion. A larger motor activity thus leads to faster filament motion. Filament dynamics is fastest for intermediate MT surface fractions $\varphi =0.3$ and $\varphi =0.4$ (Figure 3—figure supplement 3). For smaller densities the required MT-MT contacts are reduced, whereas for large densities ($\varphi =0.6$) excluded volume interactions lead to a larger effective friction hindering filament motion.

Figure 3(e) shows the histogram of the MT velocity that is projected on the MT orientation vector $\mathbf{𝐩}(t)=({\mathbf{𝐫}}_{n_{\mathrm{b}}}(t)-{\mathbf{𝐫}}_1(t))/|{\mathbf{𝐫}}_{n_{\mathrm{b}}}(t)-{\mathbf{𝐫}}_1(t)|$,

(9) $v_{\parallel }(\tau )=\frac{⟨{\mathbf{𝐝}}_i(t,\tau )\cdot \mathbf{𝐩}(t)⟩}{\tau }$

for $\varphi =0.3$, $p_{\mathrm{a}}=1.0$, and various lag times $\tau$, see Figure 3—figure supplements 1, 4 and 5 for parallel velocities at other MT surface fractions. At short lag times, the MT displacement is strongly correlated with the MT’s initial orientation vector and dominated by thermal noise, giving the largest absolute values for $v_{\parallel }$. With increasing lag time, the increasing importance of the active motor force is reflected by the increasing asymmetry of the distributions of parallel velocities that are skewed towards positive velocities. At long lag times, the MTs reorient due to active forces, such that both the width of the velocity distribution and the skew again decrease. We characterise the time delay that corresponds to the maximum skew as collective-migration time ${\tau }_{N,\max }$. This time characterises collective motion of neighbouring MTs with similar orientations that travel in the same direction. The parallel velocity distributions also depend on lag time, filament density, and motor probability (Figure 3—figure supplements 6, 7 and 9).

Finally, the active orientational correlation time ${\tau }_r$ for MTs is denoted by ${\tau }_r$. This time characterises the crossover between the active-ballistic and the active-diffusive regime in Figure 3(d). It therefore increases both with increasing size of polar or nematic domains as well as with decreasing rod activity at the interfaces, in agreement with the diffusion of tracer particles in Sanchez et al. (2012) (Figure 3—figure supplement 10).

Microtubule sliding

The displacement-correlation function,

(10) $C_{\mathrm{d}}(r,\tau )=\frac{{⟨{\sum }_{i,i\ne j}{\mathbf{𝐝}}_i\cdot {\mathbf{𝐝}}_j\delta \left(r-|{\mathbf{𝐫}}_i(t)-{\mathbf{𝐫}}_j(t)|\right)⟩}_t}{c_0{⟨{\sum }_{i,i\ne j}\delta \left(r-|{\mathbf{𝐫}}_i(t)-{\mathbf{𝐫}}_j(t)|\right)⟩}_t},$

quantifies both spatial and temporal correlations of MT motion. Here, ${\mathbf{𝐝}}_i={\mathbf{𝐫}}_i(t+\tau )-{\mathbf{𝐫}}_i(t)$, and $c_0={⟨{\sum }_i{\mathbf{𝐝}}_i^2/N⟩}_{\tau }$ is used for normalisation. Figure 4(a) shows displacement correlation functions for various lag times. At short times and distances, we find negative displacement correlations due to the effective motor potential, which selectively displaces neighbouring antialigned MTs. These negative correlations decay rapidly in space and do not contribute substantially for $r/L=1$. At intermediate lag times we find positive displacement correlations with a slower spatial decay, and at long lag times no correlations. In the limit $\tau \to 0$, $C_{\mathrm{d}}$ is the equal-time spatial velocity correlation function (Wysocki et al., 2014).

Figure 4 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Figure 4—source data 1

Source data for graphs shown in Figure 4 (a,b,c).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.39694.022

Download elife-39694-fig4-data1-v2.zip

The neighbour displacement correlation function $N_{\mathrm{d}}(\tau )=C_{\mathrm{d}}(\sigma ,\tau )$ is defined as the displacement-displacement correlation function at contact $C_{\mathrm{d}}(\sigma ,\tau )$ (Doliwa and Heuer, 2000; Wysocki et al., 2014). Figure 4(b) shows neighbour displacement correlation functions for various values of $p_{\mathrm{a}}$ and $\varphi =0.3$. Firstly, for passive systems, $N_{\mathrm{d}}$ is positive for all MT surface fractions but considerably weaker compared to the correlations in active systems. The small positive correlation is due to steric interactions and friction because of to the roughness of MTs (made up of overlapping beads). For active systems, Figure 4(b) illustrates that the temporal dependence of $N_{\mathrm{d}}(\tau )$ displays three regimes: for short times, $N_{\mathrm{d}}(\tau )$ is negative and MTs slide antiparallel, for intermediate times, $N_{\mathrm{d}}(\tau )$ is positive and MTs move collectively, and for long times, $N_{\mathrm{d}}(\tau )$ tends to zero and there is no coordinated motion. We focus here on the first regime, whereas the other regimes will be discussed in later sections.

In the short-time regime, $\tau /{\tau }_R\sim {10}^{-1}$, the effective motor potential propels neighbouring antialigned MTs away from each other and $N_{\mathrm{d}}$ is negative. This is aided by higher $p_{\mathrm{a}}$ but hindered by higher $\varphi$, which opposes active motion sterically (Figure 4—figure supplement 1). The times ${\tau }_{\mathrm{N},\min }$ at which the minima occur represent maximal MTs propulsion because of effective motor interactions, due to presence of the antialigned neighbours. At this time MTs move a small fraction of their length. In Figure 4(c) the sliding times are collected for different MT surface fractions showing that the sliding is strongly enhanced by activity, where ${\tau }_{\mathrm{N},\min }$ decreases approximately exponentially with $p_a$ and increases with surface fraction.

Polarity inversion of local MT environment

In order to characterise an MT’s neighbourhood, we define a pairwise motor partition function (Gao et al., 2015; Ravichandran et al., 2017),

(11) $q_{ij}={\rho }^2\sum _{i=1}^{n_{\mathrm{b}}}\sum _{j=1}^{n_{\mathrm{b}}}{e}^{-U_{\mathrm{mot}}(m_{ij})/(k_{B}T)},$

where $\rho =n_{\mathrm{b}}/L$ is the linear density of binding sites on a single MT, and $m_{ij}$ is the extension of the motor bound at positions $s_i$ and $s_j$ on MTs $i$ and $j$, respectively (Ravichandran et al., 2017). Local polar order thus weighs pairwise interactions of MTs on the basis of motor binding site availability. It is a function of relative orientation and distance between the beads that are used to model the MTs. Because of the Boltzmann weight, $q_{ij}$ is significant only for pairs of MTs in close proximity. When two MTs are perfectly overlapping each other, $q_{ij}=1$. When two MTs are sufficiently far away, , $q_{ij}=0$ because the MTs are outside the motor cut-off range. Since the motor energy ${\displaystyle U_{\mathsf{m}\mathsf{o}\mathsf{t}}(m_{ij})}$ increases quadratically with increasing motor extension, the partition function $q_{ij}$ decays rapidly for increasing distance between the binding sites on the MTs.

The polarity of an MTs environment is quantified by the local polar order parameter $\psi (i)$. MTs within motor cut-off range are defined to be antialigned if ${\displaystyle ({\mathbf{p}}_i\cdot {\mathbf{p}}_j)<0}$ and polar-aligned if $({\mathbf{𝐩}}_i\cdot {\mathbf{𝐩}}_j)\ge 0$. By taking the sum of all interacting MTs $j\ne i$ with MT $i$ (Gao et al., 2015; Ravichandran et al., 2017), we ensure that the local polar order parameter

(12) $\psi (i)=\frac{{\sum }_{j\ne i}({\mathbf{𝐩}}_i\cdot {\mathbf{𝐩}}_j)q_{ij}}{{\sum }_{j\ne i}{q}_{ij}}$

depends on the polarity of the neighbourhood of MT $i$. Here $q_{ij}$ is given by Equation 11. The environment of the MT can now be classified into polar (subscript-$P$, ${\displaystyle 0.5<\psi (\tau )<1}$), antipolar (subscript-$A$, ${\displaystyle -1<\psi (\tau )<-0.5}$), and mixed (subscript-$M$, ${\displaystyle -0.5<\psi (\tau )<0.5}$), see Figure 3—figure supplement 8 and Figure 5—figure supplement 1. When a single MT’s environment changes from predominantly antipolar to polar its active motion is stopped and it only moves diffusively.

By tracking changes in ${\psi }_i$ for single MTs, see Video 2, we measure the time that MTs spend in antialigned or polar-aligned environments for various values of $p_{\mathrm{a}}$ and $\varphi$. The change in local polar order of MT $i$ can be written as

(13) $\mathrm{\Delta }{\psi }_i(\tau )={\psi }_{i,0}-{\psi }_i(\tau ),$

where ${\psi }_{i,0}={\psi }_i(\tau =0)$. Figure 5(a) shows $⟨{\psi }_{i,A}(\tau )⟩$ and $⟨{\psi }_{i,P}(\tau )⟩$ for ${\displaystyle p_{\mathrm{a}}=1}$ and ${\displaystyle p_{\mathrm{a}}=0}$. In both cases, we find that $⟨{\psi }_{i,A}(\tau )⟩$ increases with time, indicating antialigned MTs leaving their antialigned environments, and that $⟨{\psi }_{i,P}(\tau )⟩$ decreases with time, indicating polar-aligned MTs leaving their polar-aligned environments. At long times, ${\psi }_{i,A}$ and ${\psi }_{i,P}$ converge to the long-time mean $⟨{\psi }_{i,\mathrm{\infty }}⟩=0$ for passive systems, and to $⟨{\psi }_{i,\mathrm{\infty }}(\tau )⟩>0$ for active systems. The time scale for relaxing $⟨{\psi }_i⟩$ to the equilibrium value is, as expected, shorter for the active than for the passive system.

Figure 5 with 3 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Figure 5—source data 1

Source data for graphs shown in Figure 5 (a,b,c).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.39694.027

Download elife-39694-fig5-data1-v2.zip

In order to quantify the change in $⟨{\psi }_i⟩$, we construct the deviation of local polar order,

(14) $Q(\tau )=1-\frac{⟨\mathrm{\Delta }{\psi }_i(\tau )⟩}{⟨{\psi }_{i,0}⟩-⟨{\psi }_{i,\mathrm{\infty }}⟩}.$

$Q(\tau )$ for the antialigned MTs is shown in Figure 5(b); the lag time for that $Q(\tau )$ reaches half its initial value is ${\tau }_{Q/2,A}$. While MTs that stay within a polar-ordered domain determine the offset for ${\varphi }_{i,A}$ at long times, only MTs entering polar aligned domains determine ${\tau }_{Q/2,A}$. Figure 5(c) shows that ${\tau }_{Q/2,A}$ decreases almost exponentially with $p_{\mathrm{a}}$ and increases with $\varphi$. In stationary state, the time scales for the inversion of local polar order of initially antialigned and initially polar-aligned MTs are equal, ${\tau }_{Q/2,A}={\tau }_{Q/2,P}$, compare Figure 5(b) and Figure 5—figure supplement 2. The dependence of $⟨{\psi }_{i,\mathrm{\infty }}⟩$ $\varphi$ and $p_{\mathrm{a}}$ is shown in Figure 5—figure supplement 3.

Maximal activity

The mean squared displacements of MTs are ballistic, diffusive, or superdiffusive depending on the lag time, see Figure 3(d). This is reflected in the distributions of the parallel velocity $v_{\parallel }$, see Equation 9 and Figure 3(e). The $v_{\parallel }$ distributions become increasingly asymmetric with increasing lag time when active propulsion dominates over Brownian motion for antialigned MTs–and again less asymmetric when the lag time is further increased and orientational memory is lost. Because of the high number of parallel MTs in our simulations the position of the main peak is at $⟨v_{\parallel }⟩=0$ as expected for passive MTs. A skew of the distribution can then be understood as a superposition of a high peak of non-propelled polar-aligned MTs and a small peak that is shifted to positive values of $v_{\parallel }$ for antialigned MTs, see also Videos 2 and 4.

In Figure 6, we plot skews of $v_{\parallel }$ distributions (Figure 3(e)) as function of lag time for various $p_{\mathrm{a}}$ values for $\varphi =0.3$. Both maximal skew and maximal lag time for that we detect finite skews increase with increasing $\varphi$, Figure 6—figure supplement 1. The lag time at which the skew of the $v_{\parallel }$ distribution is maximal is defined as the activity time ${\tau }^{*}$, where the ratio of the displacements due to active forces to the thermal displacements is largest. This activity time ${\tau }^{*}$ falls into the regime where the MSD is most superdiffusive, see Figure 3(d). As shown in Figure 6(b), ${\tau }^{*}$ exponentially decreases with increasing $p_{\mathrm{a}}$ and increases with $\varphi$. Increasing motor concentration, and thus a higher amount of active forces in the system, is akin to exponentially shifting the activity time to shorter values.

Figure 6 with 3 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Figure 6—source data 1

Source data for graphs shown in Figure 6 (a,b).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.39694.032

Download elife-39694-fig6-data1-v2.zip

The proportion of aligned (passive) and antialigned (propelled) MTs depends strongly on the area fraction, where the number of antialigned MTs decreases with surface fraction $\varphi$. This corresponds to larger domain sizes and less interfaces with increasing $\varphi$, see Figure 3—figure supplement 2 and Figure 6—figure supplement 2. Further, we notice that for all surface fractions $\varphi$ increasing $p_{\mathrm{a}}$ widens the $v_{\parallel }(\tau )$ distributions, see Figure 3—figure supplement 6. The widening of the distribution becomes less pronounced with increasing $\varphi$. The shifting of the negative part of the $v_{\parallel }$ distribution (${\displaystyle v_{\parallel }({\tau }^{\ast })<0}$) to more negative values with increasing $p_{\mathrm{a}}$ is because ${\tau }^{*}$ decreases simultaneously.

Collective migration

The observables discussed so far characterise the motion of individual MTs. They only take collective effects into consideration indirectly, for example via the asymmetry of the $v_{\parallel }$ distribution for polar-aligned MTs. For a direct discussion of the time scale of collective effects, we return to Figure 4(b). For times around $\tau /{\tau }_R=10$, in the intermediate time regime, we observe a positive neighbour displacement correlation. This behaviour is altogether absent at low surface fractions, $\varphi =0.2$, but for larger $\varphi$ the positive correlations increase with increasing $\varphi$. This suggests that neighbouring MTs in a particular stream (likely polar-aligned) travel in the same direction. These polar-aligned MTs will collectively migrate in the same direction because they are in a similarly antialigned environment, that is at the same interface with another domain. Correlations in their motion can only manifest at longer lag times, since at short lag times the correlation contribution will be dominated by fast-moving antialigned MTs. We denote the lag time for the maximum of $N_{\mathrm{d}}(\tau )$, when collective migration occurs, ${\tau }_{\mathrm{N},\max }$.

In order to explicitly show that positive neighbour displacement correlations observed in the intermediate time regime are due to collective migration of similarly oriented MTs, we can predict the results of photobleaching or photoactivation experiments (Gao et al., 2015; Mitchison, 1989; Hush et al., 1994). Experimentally, in a photobleaching experiment a high-intensity laser beam can be used to inactivate fluorescent molecules in a circular region (Axelrod et al., 1976). The time evolution of the distribution of the light-inactivated regions gives clues about the underlying mechanisms which mediate this motion. Figure 7(a) illustrates that we expect little or no MT sliding to occur in a polar-aligned region, and the photobleached area maintains its shape. In Figure 7(b), however, the photobleached area is antialigned and we expect bundles of antialigned domains to slide away, causing the photobleached spot to separate into two elongated regions. In our simulations, we perform a similar measurement, where instead of inactivating regions to inhibit fluorescence, we selectively label MT beads within a certain region. We then track their locations for $t={\tau }_{N,\text{max}}$ and investigate their displacements. MTs move in response to the effective motor potential and form streams. In Figure 7(c), we visualise a four-MT length radius circular area for $\varphi =0.4$ and $p_{\mathrm{a}}=1.0$. The structures become more diffuse for $\varphi =0.3$ and more compact for $\varphi =0.5$ (Figure 7—figure supplement 1).

Figure 7 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Active rotation

The longest relevant time scale for the MT dynamics is that of active rotational motion characterised by the orientational correlation function

(15) $⟨\mathbf{𝐩}(t)\cdot \mathbf{𝐩}(t+\tau )⟩=e^{-\tau /{\tau }_r}.$

By fitting Equation 15 to the simulation data (Figure 8(a)), we obtain the transition time to long-time active diffusive behaviour, ${\tau }_r$. Figure 8(b) shows ${\tau }_r$ for various $p_a$. For passive systems ($p_a=0$), ${\tau }_r$ increases with MT surface density $\varphi$. For active systems, ${\tau }_r$ decreases with increasing $p_a$ and with decreasing $\varphi$. In the nematic state, MTs are no longer able to rotate freely as in the isotropic case. The decrease of ${\tau }_r$ with increasing $p_a$ is more pronounced at higher MT surface fractions. Smaller values of ${\tau }_r$ correspond to smaller domain sizes. In larger domains, the streams appear at interfaces between polar-ordered domains and antialigned MTs. The streams extend in the same direction over larger lengths, for longer times, and MTs do not rotate away from their initial orientation as quickly. Also, MTs that are trapped in aligned MT bundles are less likely to exit their environments and their rotational diffusion is smaller for higher $\varphi$ and lower $p_a$. Only for $\tau >{\tau }_r$ the MTs show again diffusive motion with an active diffusion coefficient $D_A\propto v_{||}^2{\tau }_r$, see Figure 3(d).

Figure 8

Download asset Open asset

Figure 8—source data 1

Source data for graphs shown in Figure 8 (a,a-one filament,b,c).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.39694.036

Download elife-39694-fig8-data1-v2.zip

In our two-dimensional simulation model, dipolar effective motor forces that drive antialigned MT pairs are sufficient to bring about MT streams which are perpetually created and annihilated, akin to MT streaming in biology. Processes that occur on several characteristic times characterise streaming in our MT-motor mixtures: the characteristic time ${\tau }_{N,min}$ corresponds to the strongest anti-aligned motion of neighbouring MTs, the time ${\tau }_{Q/2}$ that an MT stays within a stream, the time ${\tau }^{*}$ that corresponds to maximal skew of the MT velocity distribution, the collective migration time ${\tau }_{N,max}$ that characterises maximal directed active motion, and the active rotation time ${\tau }_{\mathrm{r}}$ that corresponds to single rods traveling the distance of a polar-aligned domain when they loose their orientational memory. Figure 9 and Table 1 summarise our findings. (We do not show $\varphi =0.2$, because there is no evidence of streaming in these systems, and the chronology of events is not consistent with those observed for higher surface fractions.)

Figure 9

Download asset Open asset

Figure 9—source data 1

Source data for graphs shown in Figure 9 (a,b,c).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.39694.038

Download elife-39694-fig9-data1-v2.zip

All characteristic times increase with decreasing motor attachment probability $p_a$. We expect the sliding time ${\tau }_{N,min}$ and the active rotation time ${\tau }_r$ to diverge with vanishing motor attachment probability, while the collective migration time ${\tau }_{N,max}$ and the polarity-inversion time ${\tau }_{Q/2}$ attain finite values due to thermal motion and steric interaction between the MTs. The activity time ${\tau }^{*}$ is not defined for passive systems. Overall, the characteristic times increase with increasing MT surface density, because the lifetime and the coherence of the streams increases. However, our simulations also reveal details of the multi-scale process of streaming in MT-motor mixtures. For example, the time for an MT to transition from a polar-aligned to an antialigned environment is similar to the sliding time for low motor forces, where thermal motion dominates, and to the activity time for high motor forces when the streams are more stable.

The closest ’bottom-up’ experimental system to our simulation model is the in vitro model system of microtubule bundles, kinesin complexes, and depletants at the oil-water interface, investigated in Sanchez et al. (2012). A detailed quantitative comparison is currently not possible because the characteristic length scales in simulations and experiment are quite different. The depletion-induced MT bundle formation in the experiments leads to a characteristic length scale of the order of $10\mu m$, whereas the MTs in the simulations have lengths below $1\mu m$. However, on a more qualitative level interesting correspondences are revealed. The transition between diffusive and ballistic MSDs in the simulations has also been reported for the in vitro model system (Sanchez et al., 2012). This allows the comparison of the active diffusive regime for times ${\displaystyle \tau >{\tau }_r}$ and for lengths longer than a typical domain size. Whereas the motion in suspensions of passive MTs is diffusive, a ballistic regime at large lag times is found for increasing concentrations of active motors (simulations) and for increasing ATP concentration (experiment).

Some of our results can be used to interpret experimental results in vivo. For example, using Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) in Drosophila cells, fluid velocity distributions have been measured for wild-type oocytes and those lacking pat1, a protein required for kinesin heavy chain to maximise its motility (Ganguly et al., 2012). The main peak is close to a velocity of 10 nm/s, which hints that the majority of the MTs are propelled. As in our simulations, heavy tails in the velocity distribution have been reported in the experiments. A compariston of the experimental data for wild-type and pat1-deficient systems showed that for the wild-type system the mean speed was slower and the velocity distribution had heavier tails. This qualitatively agrees with our findings for varying $p_{\mathrm{a}}$. It was suggested in Ganguly et al. (2012) that the heavy tails in the velocity distribution of the cytosol reflect a combination of an underlying distribution of motor speeds, and a complex MT network geometry. From our simulations, we conclude that neither a complex three-dimensional cytoskeletal geometry nor a combination of different motor speeds are required to reproduce cytoskeletal velocity distributions with heavy tails.

We have studied the characteristic times of MT-motor dynamics relevant for the cytoskeleton using a coarse-grained motor model and Langevin Dynamics simulations in the overdamped regime. This allows us to access both the single-MT level as well as the collective-MT level. In previous studies that use a similar coarse-graining technique for the motor activity, the focus has been on understanding and capturing biologically relevant cytoskeletal structures (Aranson and Tsimring, 2005; Jia et al., 2008). Here, for the first time, we have decomposed the time scales of activity from single MTs to system-scale ordering and streaming.

MT advection has also been analysed using photoconversion in interphase Drosophila S2 cells, where MTs were observed to buckle and loop (Jolly et al., 2010). MT motion was visualised by photoconverting a circular region within the cell. These MTs were observed over a 7 minute period, during which 36% of the MTs were determined to be motile. It was observed that MTs spent most of the time not moving, but underwent abrupt long-distance streaming. They were found to achieve velocities up to 13 $\mu$m/min, during these bursts of active motion. These observations are very similar to those in our simulations, where MTs spend most of their times in stable polar-aligned bundles, but when in contact with an antialigned MTs coherently stream over large distances. We find similar fractions of motile MTs between 30% and 40% also for $\varphi =0.3$ in our simulations. Our study provides the basis for a more detailed quantitative comparison with experiments because the model can be easily extended to include further relevant aspects, such as a 3D cytoskeletal network, crosslinking proteins, and cellular confinement.

Our simulations show collective migration of MTs that is maximal at ${\tau }_{N,\max }$. Using a FRAP-like visualisation of our data, we find elongated MT stream patterns similar to those observed in experiments (Jolly et al., 2010). This confirms that similarly oriented MTs move colletively in the same stream. Based on the polarity-sorting mechanism of MTs, qualitatively similar FRAP results have previously been predicted using computer simulations (Gao et al., 2015). Experimental studies of a system on various length and time scales should allow testing the chronology that we predict. For example, systems with different fractions of fluorescent MTs with fixed lengths should give access to both collective as well as single-MT dynamics, for example using FRAP/photoactivation for systems with many labeled MTs to quantify collective dynamics and confocal microscopy for systems with few labeled MTs to investigate correlations in single-MT motion.

We have studied collective motion in active gels based on single MTs. Our spatio-temporal displacement correlation functions show that antialigned MTs slide away from each other in opposite directions for short time windows, while in agreement with experiments positive correlations occur for long time windows (Ganguly et al., 2012). Our two-dimensional simulations resemble systems close to an interface that have been used to experimentally study hierarchically assembled active matter (Sanchez et al., 2012). They also lay the foundations for future studies of 3D systems and have allowed us to test parameter regimes using less computationally expensive, two-dimensional systems. Furthermore, although we observe streaming without hydrodynamics, hydrodynamic interactions may still be an important player for motor-MT systems, which can be investigated in future studies.

To summarize, our results provide a direct handle to fully characterise MT streaming over a wide range of time and length scales. Future experimental studies using modern microscopy techniques may allow testing our predictions. Future theoretical and computer simulation studies may provide further insights, such as the importance of the aspect ratio of the MTs, the presence of motors between polar-aligned MTs, and the effect of crosslinkers important for buckling and looping of flexible MTs.

Source code and input files required to simulate microtubule-effective motor systems using the freely available, open-source Large-scale Atomic/Molecular Massively Parallel Simulator (LAMMPS) have been provided.

1. 1. Abkenar M
   2. Marx K
   3. Auth T
   4. Gompper G

   (2013) Collective behavior of penetrable self-propelled rods in two dimensions

   Physical Review E 88:062314.

   https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.88.062314

   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Aranson IS
   2. Tsimring LS

   (2005) Pattern formation of microtubules and motors: inelastic interaction of polar rods

   Physical Review E 71:050901.

   https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.71.050901

   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Aranson IS
   2. Tsimring LS

   (2006) Theory of self-assembly of microtubules and motors

   Physical Review E 74:031915.

   https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.74.031915

   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Axelrod D
   2. Koppel DE
   3. Schlessinger J
   4. Elson E
   5. Webb WW

   (1976) Mobility measurement by analysis of fluorescence photobleaching recovery kinetics

   Biophysical Journal 16:1055–1069.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(76)85755-4

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Bates MA
   2. Frenkel D

   (2000) Phase behavior of two-dimensional hard rod fluids

   The Journal of Chemical Physics 112:10034–10041.

   https://doi.org/10.1063/1.481637

   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Bechinger C
   2. Di Leonardo R
   3. Löwen H
   4. Reichhardt C
   5. Volpe G
   6. Volpe G

   (2016) Active particles in complex and crowded environments

   Reviews of Modern Physics 88:045006.

   https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.88.045006

   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Belmonte JM
   2. Leptin M
   3. Nédélec F

   (2017) A theory that predicts behaviors of disordered cytoskeletal networks

   Molecular Systems Biology 13:941.

   https://doi.org/10.15252/msb.20177796

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
8. Book

   1. Berthold G

   (1886)

   Studien Über Protoplasmamechanik

   Verlag von Arthur Felix.

   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Blackwell R
   2. Sweezy-Schindler O
   3. Baldwin C
   4. Hough LE
   5. Glaser MA
   6. Betterton MD

   (2016) Microscopic origins of anisotropic active stress in motor-driven nematic liquid crystals

   Soft Matter 12:2676–2687.

   https://doi.org/10.1039/C5SM02506K

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Bolhuis P
    2. Frenkel D

    (1997) Tracing the phase boundaries of hard spherocylinders

    The Journal of Chemical Physics 106:666–687.

    https://doi.org/10.1063/1.473404

    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Burdyniuk M
    2. Callegari A
    3. Mori M
    4. Nédélec F
    5. Lénárt P

    (2018) F-Actin nucleated on chromosomes coordinates their capture by microtubules in oocyte meiosis

    The Journal of Cell Biology 217:2661–2674.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201802080

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Chen K
    2. Wang B
    3. Granick S

    (2015) Memoryless self-reinforcing directionality in endosomal active transport within living cells

    Nature Materials 14:589–593.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4239

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Chrétien D
    2. Wade RH

    (1991) New data on the microtubule surface lattice

    Biology of the Cell 71:161–174.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0248-4900(91)90062-R

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Coppin CM
    2. Finer JT
    3. Spudich JA
    4. Vale RD

    (1995)

    Measurement of the isometric force exerted by a single kinesin molecule

    Biophysical Journal 68:242s–244s.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Córdoba A
    2. Schieber JD
    3. Indei T

    (2015) The role of filament length, finite-extensibility and motor force dispersity in stress relaxation and buckling mechanisms in non-sarcomeric active gels

    Soft Matter 11:38–57.

    https://doi.org/10.1039/C4SM01944J

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
16. 1. DeCamp SJ
    2. Redner GS
    3. Baskaran A
    4. Hagan MF
    5. Dogic Z

    (2015) Orientational order of motile defects in active nematics

    Nature Materials 14:1110–1115.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4387

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Doliwa B
    2. Heuer A

    (2000) Cooperativity and spatial correlations near the glass transition: computer simulation results for hard spheres and disks

    Physical Review E 61:6898–6908.

    https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.61.6898

    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Duman Ö
    2. Isele-Holder RE
    3. Elgeti J
    4. Gompper G

    (2018) Collective dynamics of self-propelled semiflexible filaments

    Soft Matter 14:4483–4494.

    https://doi.org/10.1039/c8sm00282g

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Elgeti J
    2. Winkler RG
    3. Gompper G

    (2015) Physics of microswimmers--single particle motion and collective behavior: a review

    Reports on Progress in Physics 78:056601.

    https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/78/5/056601

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Freedman SL
    2. Banerjee S
    3. Hocky GM
    4. Dinner AR

    (2017) A versatile framework for simulating the dynamic mechanical structure of cytoskeletal networks

    Biophysical Journal 113:448–460.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2017.06.003

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Ganguly S
    2. Williams LS
    3. Palacios IM
    4. Goldstein RE

    (2012) Cytoplasmic streaming in Drosophila oocytes varies with kinesin activity and correlates with the microtubule cytoskeleton architecture

    PNAS 109:15109–15114.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1203575109

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Gao T
    2. Blackwell R
    3. Glaser MA
    4. Betterton MD
    5. Shelley MJ

    (2015) Multiscale polar theory of microtubule and motor-protein assemblies

    Physical Review Letters 114:048101.

    https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.048101

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Gompper G
    2. Ihle T
    3. Kroll D
    4. Winkler R

    (2009) Multi-particle collision dynamics: a particle-based mesoscale simulation approach to the hydrodynamics of complex fluids

    Advances in Polymer Science 221:1–87.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87706-6_1

    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Gutzeit H

    (1986) The role of microtubules in the differentiation of ovarian follicles during vitellogenesis in Drosophila

    Roux’s Archives of Developmental Biology 195:173–181.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02439435

    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Head DA
    2. Briels W
    3. Gompper G

    (2011a) Spindles and active vortices in a model of confined filament-motor mixtures

    BMC Biophysics 4:18.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-1682-4-18

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Head DA
    2. Gompper G
    3. Briels WJ

    (2011b) Microscopic basis for pattern formation and anomalous transport in two-dimensional active gels

    Soft Matter 7:3116–3126.

    https://doi.org/10.1039/C0SM00888E

    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Head DA
    2. Briels WJ
    3. Gompper G

    (2014) Nonequilibrium structure and dynamics in a microscopic model of thin-film active gels

    Physical Review E 89:032705.

    https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.89.032705

    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Hiraiwa T
    2. Salbreux G

    (2016) Role of turnover in active stress generation in a filament network

    Physical Review Letters 116:188101.

    https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.188101

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Howard J
    2. Hudspeth AJ
    3. Vale RD

    (1989) Movement of microtubules by single kinesin molecules

    Nature 342:154–158.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/342154a0

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Hush JM
    2. Wadsworth P
    3. Callaham DA
    4. Hepler PK

    (1994)

    Quantification of microtubule dynamics in living plant cells using fluorescence redistribution after photobleaching

    Journal of Cell Science 107:775–784.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Isele-Holder RE
    2. Elgeti J
    3. Gompper G

    (2015) Self-propelled worm-like filaments: spontaneous spiral formation, structure, and dynamics

    Soft Matter 11:7181–7190.

    https://doi.org/10.1039/C5SM01683E

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Isele-Holder RE
    2. Jäger J
    3. Saggiorato G
    4. Elgeti J
    5. Gompper G

    (2016) Dynamics of self-propelled filaments pushing a load

    Soft Matter 12:8495–8505.

    https://doi.org/10.1039/C6SM01094F

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Jia Z
    2. Karpeev D
    3. Aranson IS
    4. Bates PW

    (2008) Simulation studies of self-organization of microtubules and molecular motors

    Physical Review E 77:051905.

    https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.77.051905

    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Jolly AL
    2. Kim H
    3. Srinivasan D
    4. Lakonishok M
    5. Larson AG
    6. Gelfand VI

    (2010) Kinesin-1 heavy chain mediates microtubule sliding to drive changes in cell shape

    PNAS 107:12151–12156.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1004736107

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Jülicher F
    2. Ajdari A
    3. Prost J

    (1997) Modeling molecular motors

    Reviews of Modern Physics 69:1269–1282.

    https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.69.1269

    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Kerssemakers J
    2. Howard J
    3. Hess H
    4. Diez S

    (2006) The distance that kinesin-1 holds its cargo from the microtubule surface measured by fluorescence interference contrast microscopy

    PNAS 103:15812–15817.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0510400103

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Khuc Trong P
    2. Doerflinger H
    3. Dunkel J
    4. St Johnston D
    5. Goldstein RE

    (2015) Cortical microtubule nucleation can organise the cytoskeleton of Drosophila oocytes to define the anteroposterior axis

    eLife 4:e06088.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06088

    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Kruse K
    2. Camalet S
    3. Jülicher F

    (2001) Self-propagating patterns in active filament bundles

    Physical Review Letters 87:138101.

    https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.138101

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Kruse K
    2. Joanny JF
    3. Jülicher F
    4. Prost J
    5. Sekimoto K

    (2004) Asters, vortices, and rotating spirals in active gels of polar filaments

    Physical Review Letters 92:078101.

    https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.078101

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Kruse K
    2. Joanny JF
    3. Jülicher F
    4. Prost J
    5. Sekimoto K

    (2005) Generic theory of active polar gels: a paradigm for cytoskeletal dynamics

    The European Physical Journal E 16:5–16.

    https://doi.org/10.1140/epje/e2005-00002-5

    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Kruse K
    2. Jülicher F

    (2000) Actively contracting bundles of polar filaments

    Physical Review Letters 85:1778–1781.

    https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.1778

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Lacroix B
    2. Letort G
    3. Pitayu L
    4. Sallé J
    5. Stefanutti M
    6. Maton G
    7. Ladouceur AM
    8. Canman JC
    9. Maddox PS
    10. Maddox AS
    11. Minc N
    12. Nédélec F
    13. Dumont J

    (2018) Microtubule dynamics scale with cell size to set spindle length and assembly timing

    Developmental Cell 45:496–511.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2018.04.022

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
43. 1. Letort G
    2. Nedelec F
    3. Blanchoin L
    4. Théry M

    (2016) Centrosome centering and decentering by microtubule network rearrangement

    Molecular Biology of the Cell 27:2833–2843.

    https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e16-06-0395

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Lu W
    2. Winding M
    3. Lakonishok M
    4. Wildonger J
    5. Gelfand VI

    (2016) Microtubule-microtubule sliding by kinesin-1 is essential for normal cytoplasmic streaming in Drosophila oocytes

    PNAS 113:E4995–E5004.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1522424113

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
45. 1. McGrother SC
    2. Williamson DC
    3. Jackson G

    (1996) A re‐examination of the phase diagram of hard spherocylinders

    The Journal of Chemical Physics 104:6755–6771.

    https://doi.org/10.1063/1.471343

    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Mitchison TJ

    (1989) Polewards microtubule flux in the mitotic spindle: evidence from photoactivation of fluorescence

    The Journal of Cell Biology 109:637–652.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.109.2.637

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Mizuno D
    2. Tardin C
    3. Schmidt CF
    4. Mackintosh FC

    (2007) Nonequilibrium mechanics of active cytoskeletal networks

    Science 315:370–373.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1134404

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Monteith CE
    2. Brunner ME
    3. Djagaeva I
    4. Bielecki AM
    5. Deutsch JM
    6. Saxton WM

    (2016) A mechanism for cytoplasmic streaming: kinesin-driven alignment of microtubules and fast fluid flows

    Biophysical Journal 110:2053–2065.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2016.03.036

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Müller K
    2. Fedosov DA
    3. Gompper G

    (2015) Smoothed dissipative particle dynamics with angular momentum conservation

    Journal of Computational Physics 281:301–315.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2014.10.017

    • Google Scholar
50. 1. Nazockdast E
    2. Rahimian A
    3. Needleman D
    4. Shelley M

    (2017a) Cytoplasmic flows as signatures for the mechanics of mitotic positioning

    Molecular Biology of the Cell 28:3261–3270.

    https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e16-02-0108

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Nazockdast E
    2. Rahimian A
    3. Zorin D
    4. Shelley M

    (2017b) A fast platform for simulating semi-flexible fiber suspensions applied to cell mechanics

    Journal of Computational Physics 329:173–209.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2016.10.026

    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Nedelec F
    2. Foethke D

    (2007) Collective langevin dynamics of flexible cytoskeletal fibers

    New Journal of Physics 9:427.

    https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/9/11/427

    • Google Scholar
53. 1. Needleman D
    2. Dogic Z

    (2017) Active matter at the interface between materials science and cell biology

    Nature Reviews Materials 2:17048.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2017.48

    • Google Scholar
54. 1. Palacios IM
    2. St Johnston D

    (2002) Kinesin light chain-independent function of the kinesin heavy chain in cytoplasmic streaming and posterior localisation in the Drosophila oocyte

    Development 129:5473–5485.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.00119

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
55. 1. Plimpton S

    (1995) Fast parallel algorithms for Short-Range molecular dynamics

    Journal of Computational Physics 117:1–19.

    https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1995.1039

    • Google Scholar
56. 1. Quinlan ME

    (2016) Cytoplasmic streaming in the Drosophila oocyte

    Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 32:173–195.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-111315-125416

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
57. 1. Ravichandran A
    2. Vliegenthart GA
    3. Saggiorato G
    4. Auth T
    5. Gompper G

    (2017) Enhanced dynamics of confined cytoskeletal filaments driven by asymmetric motors

    Biophysical Journal 113:1121–1132.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2017.07.016

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
58. 1. Ronceray P
    2. Broedersz CP
    3. Lenz M

    (2016) Fiber networks amplify active stress

    PNAS 113:2827–2832.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514208113

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
59. 1. Salbreux G
    2. Prost J
    3. Joanny JF

    (2009) Hydrodynamics of cellular cortical flows and the formation of contractile rings

    Physical Review Letters 103:058102.

    https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.058102

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
60. 1. Sanchez T
    2. Chen DT
    3. DeCamp SJ
    4. Heymann M
    5. Dogic Z

    (2012) Spontaneous motion in hierarchically assembled active matter

    Nature 491:431–434.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11591

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
61. 1. Schnitzer MJ
    2. Block SM

    (1997) Kinesin hydrolyses one ATP per 8-nm step

    Nature 388:386–390.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/41111

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
62. 1. Serbus LR
    2. Cha BJ
    3. Theurkauf WE
    4. Saxton WM

    (2005) Dynein and the actin cytoskeleton control kinesin-driven cytoplasmic streaming in Drosophila oocytes

    Development 132:3743–3752.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.01956

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
63. 1. Swaminathan S
    2. Ziebert F
    3. Aranson IS
    4. Karpeev D

    (2010) Patterns and intrinsic fluctuations in semi-dilute motor-filament systems

    EPL 90:28001.

    https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/90/28001

    • Google Scholar
64. 1. Theurkauf WE
    2. Smiley S
    3. Wong ML
    4. Alberts BM

    (1992)

    Reorganization of the cytoskeleton during Drosophila oogenesis: implications for axis specification and intercellular transport

    Development 115:923–936.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
65. 1. Toprak E
    2. Yildiz A
    3. Hoffman MT
    4. Rosenfeld SS
    5. Selvin PR

    (2009) Why kinesin is so processive

    PNAS 106:12717–12722.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0808396106

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
66. 1. Vale RD
    2. Milligan RA

    (2000) The way things move: looking under the hood of molecular motor proteins

    Science 288:88–95.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.288.5463.88

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
67. 1. Weeks JD
    2. Chandler D
    3. Andersen HC

    (1971) Role of repulsive forces in determining the equilibrium structure of simple liquids

    The Journal of Chemical Physics 54:5237–5247.

    https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1674820

    • Google Scholar
68. 1. Winding M
    2. Kelliher MT
    3. Lu W
    4. Wildonger J
    5. Gelfand VI

    (2016) Role of kinesin-1-based microtubule sliding in Drosophila nervous system development

    PNAS 113:E4985–E4994.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1522416113

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
69. 1. Winkler RG
    2. Gompper G

    (2018)

    Handbook of Materials Modeling: Methods: Theory and Modeling

    Hydrodynamics in Motile Active Matter, Handbook of Materials Modeling: Methods: Theory and Modeling, Springer, 10.1007/978-3-319-42913-7_35-1.

    • Google Scholar
70. Preprint

    1. Winters L
    2. Ban I
    3. Prelogovic M
    4. Pavin N
    5. Tolic IM

    (2018) Pivoting of microtubules driven by minus end directed motors leads to their alignment to form an interpolar bundle

    bioRxiv.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/347831

    • Google Scholar
71. 1. Wirtz D

    (2009) Particle-tracking microrheology of living cells: principles and applications

    Annual Review of Biophysics 38:301–326.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biophys.050708.133724

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
72. 1. Wollrab V
    2. Belmonte JM
    3. Baldauf L
    4. Leptin M
    5. Nédeléc F
    6. Koenderink GH

    (2018) Polarity sorting drives remodeling of actin-myosin networks

    Journal of Cell Science 132:.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.219717

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
73. 1. Woodhouse FG
    2. Goldstein RE

    (2013) Cytoplasmic streaming in plant cells emerges naturally by microfilament self-organization

    PNAS 110:14132–14137.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1302736110

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
74. 1. Wysocki A
    2. Winkler RG
    3. Gompper G

    (2014) Cooperative motion of active brownian spheres in three-dimensional dense suspensions

    EPL 105:48004.

    https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/105/48004

    • Google Scholar
75. 1. Zöttl A
    2. Stark H

    (2016) Emergent behavior in active colloids

    Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 28:253001.

    https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/28/25/253001

    • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Arvind Ravichandran

   Theoretical Soft Matter and Biophysics, Institute of Complex Systems and Institute for Advanced Simulation, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany

   Contribution

   Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing, Code development-simulation, Code development-data analysis, Code development-visualization

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6247-5229

2. Özer Duman

   Theoretical Soft Matter and Biophysics, Institute of Complex Systems and Institute for Advanced Simulation, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany

   Contribution

   Investigation, Methodology, Code development-data analysis, Code development-visualization

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

3. Masoud Hoore

   Theoretical Soft Matter and Biophysics, Institute of Complex Systems and Institute for Advanced Simulation, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany

   Contribution

   Methodology, Writing—original draft, Code development-simulation

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1442-4739

4. Guglielmo Saggiorato

   Theoretical Soft Matter and Biophysics, Institute of Complex Systems and Institute for Advanced Simulation, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany

   Present address

   LPTMS, CNRS, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Methodology

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

5. Gerard A Vliegenthart

   Theoretical Soft Matter and Biophysics, Institute of Complex Systems and Institute for Advanced Simulation, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing

   For correspondence

   g.vliegenthart@fz-juelich.de

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2459-8652

6. Thorsten Auth

   Theoretical Soft Matter and Biophysics, Institute of Complex Systems and Institute for Advanced Simulation, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing

   For correspondence

   t.auth@fz-juelich.de

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6618-2316

7. Gerhard Gompper

   Theoretical Soft Matter and Biophysics, Institute of Complex Systems and Institute for Advanced Simulation, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Resources, Investigation, Methodology, Writing—review and editing

   For correspondence

   g.gompper@fz-juelich.de

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8904-0986

• 1,305

  Page views

• 230

  Downloads

• 8

  Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.