Human excitatory amino acid transporters (EAATs) take up the neurotransmitter glutamate in the brain and are essential to maintain excitatory neurotransmission. Our understanding of the EAATs’ molecular mechanisms has been hampered by the lack of stability of purified protein samples for biophysical analyses. Here, we present approaches based on consensus mutagenesis to obtain thermostable EAAT1 variants that share up to ~95% amino acid identity with the wild type transporters, and remain natively folded and functional. Structural analyses of EAAT1 and the consensus designs using hydrogen-deuterium exchange linked to mass spectrometry show that small and highly cooperative unfolding events at the inter-subunit interface rate-limit their thermal denaturation, while the transport domain unfolds at a later stage in the unfolding pathway. Our findings provide structural insights into the kinetic stability of human glutamate transporters, and introduce general approaches to extend the lifetime of human membrane proteins for biophysical analyses.https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.40110.001
Integral membrane proteins are essential to the life of any cell and constitute drug targets of paramount importance (Yildirim et al., 2007). The most established approach to obtain purified membrane proteins for molecular and structural studies involves their detergent solubilization and extraction from cell membranes (Smith, 2017). However, detergent micelles are rather poor surrogates of membranes, and tend to stabilize unfolded and dysfunctional states of membrane proteins (Tate, 2010). Current methods to overcome this problem involve mainly engineering stability through mutagenesis using amino acid scanning and directed evolution (Scott et al., 2013), and have been successfully used to stabilize both prokaryotic (Zhou and Bowie, 2000; Faham et al., 2004) and animal integral membrane proteins (Magnani et al., 2008; Magnani et al., 2016; Sarkar et al., 2008; Scott and Plückthun, 2013; Coleman et al., 2016). However, these approaches rely on screening of a large number of mutants and high-throughput methods to probe protein expression and stability, which makes them labor-intensive and sometimes impractical.
Methods based on phylogenetic analysis of amino acid sequences constitute an attractive alternative to predict stabilizing mutations (Sauer et al., 2015), in particular those using amino acid consensus from sequences of structural homologs (Steipe, 2004; Porebski and Buckle, 2016; Lehmann and Wyss, 2001). Pioneering work on antibody stability showed that consensus mutagenesis has much higher rate of success (~60%) than random mutagenesis (Steipe et al., 1994). Moreover, full consensus sequences of soluble proteins (Lehmann et al., 2000; Sullivan et al., 2011) or repeated domains (Mosavi et al., 2002; Kohl et al., 2003) demonstrated significantly higher stability than the individual sequences that were used for their design, while combinatorial consensus mutagenesis was shown to improve the thermal stability of several soluble proteins (Pantoliano et al., 1989; Ohage et al., 1997; Nikolova et al., 1998). However, the applicability of these approaches to human membrane proteins in detergent solutions has remained unexplored.
Human glutamate transporters (EAATs) belong to the SoLute Carrier 1 (SLC1) family of ion-coupled transporters (Slotboom et al., 1999). Isoforms EAAT1 and EAAT2 are highly expressed in the central nervous system (Danbolt, 2001) where they take up glutamate using the energy stored in the sodium, proton and potassium transmembrane electrochemical gradients (Zerangue and Kavanaugh, 1996). These transporters and their mammalian orthologs are highly unstable in detergent solutions and loose their function during purification (Gordon and Kanner, 1988; Shouffani and Kanner, 1990), which has precluded the biophysical and structural characterization of purified transporters. Using consensus mutagenesis and loop engineering, we recently designed thermostable variants of human EAAT1 for crystallization (EAAT1CRYST) and solved their 3D structures (Canul-Tec et al., 2017). Notably, these variants share ~75% amino acid sequence identity with the wild type transporter (EAAT1WT) and cover ~95% of its sequence, constituting the closest structural homologs of human EAATs with known structure. EAAT1CRYST is a homo-trimer, in which each subunit contains two structural and functional domains, namely the scaffold (ScaD) and transport (TranD) domains, previously observed in the structures of a glutamate transporter prokaryotic homologue (Yernool et al., 2004; Reyes et al., 2009). The ScaD forms the inter-subunit interface through extensive contacts on both the extracellular half of the membrane between transmembrane helix 2 (TM2) and TM4a-b of contacting subunits, as well as on the cytoplasmic side between TM4c and TM5 of its neighboring subunit. Most of the remaining structured regions of the protein are alpha helical, including TM3 and TM6-8, as well as two re-entrant loops (HP1-2) that fold into the TranD that encages the substrate and the stoichiometrically coupled ions (Boudker et al., 2007; Guskov et al., 2016; Seal and Amara, 1998; Tao et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 1998). Substrate translocation across the membrane occurs through large rigid-body movements of the TranD relative to the ScaD in a so-called ‘elevator-like’ fashion (Reyes et al., 2009; Crisman et al., 2009) and shows no cooperativity between the subunits (Ruan et al., 2017).
In this work, we used consensus-based approaches to design EAAT1 variants that share as much as ~95% amino acid sequence identity, and remain folded and functional in detergent solutions. Structural comparison between folded and unfolded states of the transporters unravels key structural changes that determine the kinetic stability of the transporters, and provide unprecedented insights on their thermal denaturation pathway.
EAAT1WT heterologously expresses at the cell surface of mammalian cells and is functional for neurotransmitter transport (Arriza et al., 1994). However, when detergent-purified and reconstituted into synthetic liposomes, EAAT1WT lacks this function suggesting that the detergent solutions used for solubilization and purification irreversibly inactivate the protein (Canul-Tec et al., 2017). To increase the stability of the transporters in detergent solutions, we identified the most frequent amino acids among representative animal SLC1 structural homologs (i.e. consensus amino acids; see methods), and simultaneously exchanged all residues within the expected helical regions of EAAT1WT for consensus amino acids. This consensus design yielded a transporter, so-called EAAT1-consensus (EAAT1CO), with 44 and 33 amino acid exchanges in the ScaD and TranD, respectively (Figure 1a, Figure 1—figure supplement 1). The exchanges localize mostly to hydrophobic regions facing either the trimeric interface or the lipid bilayer and involve conservative substitutions among hydrophobic residues (mainly between Ile, Leu, Val, and Met). EAAT1CO shares 85% amino acid identity and 92% similarity with EAAT1WT, and shows similar levels of neurotransmitter uptake in cells compared to EAAT1WT. Unlike the wild-type protein however, EAAT1CO featured robust glutamate uptake upon purification and reconstitution in synthetic liposomes (Figure 1c–e). Moreover, glutamate transport in liposomes was strongly dependent on opposite gradients of sodium and potassium across the bilayer, and the rate of transport increased with the external L-glutamate concentration with a Km (~30 μM) similar to the one reported for EAAT1WT (Arriza et al., 1994). Altogether, these data demonstrate that detergent-solubilized and purified EAAT1CO remains active and that its ion-coupled transport mechanism is conserved.
In a second consensus design, we hypothesized that coevolved residue-residue contacts could play an important role in protein stability. Amino acid covariance in large sequence alignments has been shown to accurately predict amino acid physical proximity in 3D protein structures (Morcos et al., 2011; Hopf et al., 2012; Kamisetty et al., 2013; Nugent and Jones, 2012), and we used it as a proxy for coevolved inter-residue contacts. Amino acid covariance was calculated from a curated PFAM alignment of the SLC1 family, and the consensus exchanges were restricted to positions in the EAAT1WT sequence with the highest covariance (see methods). It is worth noting that the consensus amino acid exchanges were identical to those in EAAT1CO, and determined from animal SLC1 homologs. This alternative design yielded a transporter, the so-called EAAT1-consensus-covariance (EAAT1COCO), that contains a subset of the EAAT1CO amino acid exchanges, 15 in the ScaD and 14 in TranD, and shares high amino acid sequence identity (95%) and similarity (97%) with EAAT1WT (Figure 1b, Figure 1—figure supplement 1). Like EAAT1CO, purified EAAT1COCO retained conserved ion-coupled transport mechanism upon reconstitution in synthetic liposomes (Figure 1c–e).
To gain insights into the structural differences between EAAT1WT and the consensus designs in detergent solutions, we compared their hydrogen-deuterium exchange (HDX) behavior using a protease-induced fragmentation approach linked to mass spectrometry (MS) (Konermann et al., 2011; Englander et al., 2016). HDX-MS measures the rate of deuterium exchange of the hydrogen amide in the protein backbone that strongly depends on the presence of secondary structure, due to the engagement of the amide group in hydrogen bonding, as well as on its access to the aqueous solvent. Therefore, HDX-MS provides very valuable information on protein folding, stability, and dynamics.
EAAT1CO and EAAT1COCO showed similar overall HDX patterns when assayed at 20°C in detergent solutions with overall sequence coverage of ~70% (Figure 2a–e, Figure 2—figure supplements 1 and 2), and unimodal isotopic envelopes across all peptides (Figure 2, Figure 2—figure supplement 3). The deuterium uptake time course of most peptides covering structured regions of the TranD and ScaD based on the structure of EAAT1CRYST showed slow deuterium incorporation that starts after ≥10 s, or even lacked any incorporation for up to 1 hr (Figure 2a–c, Figure 2—figure supplement 4). The observed kinetics is several orders of magnitude slower than predicted for unstructured peptides that are expected to reach saturating uptake values in the millisecond range under our experimental conditions (Bai et al., 1993). This demonstrates high degree of backbone protection of those peptides and strongly suggests conservation of the overall secondary structure in the transporters. Notably, TranD peptides covering buried regions that lack secondary structure and are involved in coordination of substrate and sodium ions, like the SLC1-family signature sequence 398-NMDG-401, also showed high degree of HDX backbone protection arguing that ligands remain bound and occluded from the bulk solution as observed in the crystal structures. In contrast, peptides covering predicted unstructured and non-conserved regions like the N- and C-termini, as well as the extracellular loops connecting TM3-TM4a and TM4b-TM4c, respectively, which were not resolved in the EAAT1CRYST structures, showed saturating levels of deuterium uptake already at the shortest time measured of 10 s, consistent with these regions being fully solvent accessible. Importantly, the HDX patterns of EAAT1CO and EAAT1COCO are similar to that of EAAT1CRYST (Canul-Tec et al., 2017), which is also a functional transporter, suggesting that the overall secondary structure is similar among these transporters.
The HDX behavior of detergent-solubilized EAAT1WT was strikingly different from the consensus designs and showed an overall dramatic increase in deuterium uptake over most of the sequence coverage (Figure 2a–c and f, Figure 2—figure supplements 4 and 5). The HDX increase was most prominent in the cytoplasmic half of the TranD including TM3 (peptide 112 – 123) and importantly, in peptides covering the substrate and sodium binding sites in HP1 (peptide 357 – 369), TM7 (peptides 390 – 399 and 397 – 404), and TM8b (peptide 479 – 492). These regions of the TranD revealed maximal deuterium uptake already at 10 s, just as we observed in the unstructured N- and C-termini. The dramatic loss of HDX backbone protection at the functional core of the wild type transporter, compared to the consensus designs, implies that its native structure along with the interactions with the substrate and sodium ions was lost upon detergent-solubilization and purification. We also observed increased HDX in the ScaD, particularly in extracellular TM4a-b (including peptide 174 – 184, and 187 – 194) that forms extensive inter-subunit contacts, as well as the cytoplasmic end of TM2 (peptide 98 – 104) connecting the ScaD to the TranD at the level of TM3. Although the deuterium uptake time course in these regions still reveals some level of backbone protection, the large increase in deuterium uptake argues that the ScaD in EAAT1WT has partly lost secondary structure and/or that the oligomeric state of the transporter is compromised.
Altogether the HDX results show that EAAT1CO and EAAT1COCO retain the native fold observe in the structure of EAAT1CRYST, while EAAT1WT undergoes partial and extensive unfolding events that include the substrate and coupled-sodium binding sites. Consistently, purified EAAT1CO and EAAT1COCO, but not EAAT1WT showed robust transport function. The above results prove that the consensus, as well as the consensus-covariance designs can be used as semi-rational approaches to stabilize human EAAT1 and possibly other membrane proteins for biophysical analyses of their molecular mechanisms.
To gain further insights into the stability of EAAT1CO and EAAT1COCO, we studied their thermal denaturation. Thermal denaturation is in general an irreversible process in detergent-solubilized membrane proteins, and offers the possibility to capture kinetic intermediates of the unfolding pathway. We first used size exclusion chromatography (SEC) to analyze the effect of single twenty-minute temperature pre-pulses on purified EAAT1CO and EAAT1COCO in detergent solutions, at a constant protein concentration. In this way, we aimed to quantify the irreversible effect of temperature on protein solubility, aggregation, and oligomeric state compared to reference transporters that were not pre-heated.
Indeed, both EAAT1CO and EAAT1COCO reference samples maintained at 4°C eluted as monodisperse peaks that correspond to the trimeric form of the transporters, and remained stable up to 35°C and 25°C, respectively (Figure 3a,b,d,e). At higher temperatures the trimers unfolded into a lower oligomeric state accompanied by a significant right-shift in the elution volume, but without any sign of aggregation or insolubility judging by the lack of high molecular-weight peaks and the constant area under the chromatograms at all temperatures, respectively. The temperature at which half of the transporters were in the trimeric state (T50-SEC) in EAAT1CO and EAAT1COCO were 49.06 ± 0.02°C and 38.4 ± 0.3°C, respectively, demonstrating that the quaternary structure of EAAT1CO is kinetically more thermo-stable than that of EAAT1COCO. Interestingly, the appearance of a single low molecular-weight peak in the chromatographic profiles at high temperatures argues that the trimers unfold into monomers, in a highly cooperative process that does not involve the formation of stable dimers, and that monomers remain soluble at pre-pulse temperatures up to 65°C.
In order to probe the transport function of the low molecular-weight species observed by SEC, we reconstituted EAAT1COCO samples pre-heated at 55°C in liposomes, and compared them to the reference samples maintained at 4°C. Indeed, the large decrease in neurotransmitter uptake observed in the pre-heated samples shows that the transport function of the low molecular-weight species has been largely impaired (Figure 3—figure supplement 1), and indicates that the monomeric form of the transporter is not functional.
The concomitant loss of trimeric state and transport function argues that early events during the thermal inactivation of the transporters involve the cooperative dissociation of the subunits, and suggests an important role of the trimeric interface in the thermal stability of the transporters. To gain further insights into the role of this interface, we built a transporter with the ScaD of EAAT1CO and the TranD of EAAT1COCO (EAAT1-ScaDCO-TranDCOCO), which involved adding 29 consensus mutations into the EAAT1COCO ScaD (Figure 1, Figure 1—figure supplement 1). Notably, the temperature unfolding curve of EAAT1-ScaDCO-TranDCOCO approached that of EAAT1CO (T50-SEC of 45.2 ± 1.0°C; Figure 3f) confirming that key determinants of the transporter thermal stability localize to the trimeric interface.
The chromatographic and functional analysis of the consensus designs clearly established that temperature pre-pulses irreversibly generate soluble intermediates of the thermal unfolding pathway. To gain structural insights into these intermediates, we measured deuterium uptake at 20°C in transporters pre-heated at different temperatures, using as reference transporters that were not pre-heated. Since the sample throughput by HDX-MS is limited, we focused the analysis of EAAT1CO and EAAT1COCO to temperatures corresponding to their respective T50-SEC, as well as selected temperatures below and above it.
The overall HDX behavior of EAAT1CO and EAAT1COCO was similar when the transporters were pre-heated at temperatures close to their T50-SEC, 50°C and 40°C, respectively (Figure 4a,b; Figure 4—figure supplements 1a,b and 2a). In the TranD of the two consensus designs, deuterium uptake remained unchanged showing that within the limits of our sequence coverage, there were no irreversible structural changes at temperatures near the T50-SEC. Strikingly, the two consensus designs showed significant HDX increases in the extracellular part of TM4 (e.g. peptide 174 – 184) and TM2 (e.g. peptide 81 – 87), which localize to the inter-subunit interface in the trimeric transporters. To a lesser extent, HDX also increased in the cytoplasmic parts of TM2 and TM3 in EAAT1CO (e.g. peptides 105–111 and 112–123, respectively), as well as the extracellular end of TM4c in EAAT1COCO (peptide 230–246), which are in close proximity to that interface (Figure 4a,b). These results map the initial temperature-induced structural changes in the transporters to the extracellular part of the inter-subunit interface, and reinforce its key role in thermal stability.
Next, we measured HDX in EAAT1CO and EAAT1COCO pre-heated at 65°C and 55°C (Figure 4—figure supplements 1c and 2b), respectively. Both transporters showed dramatic HDX increases at the inter-subunit interface and its proximity (e.g. TM4 peptide 174–184; and TM2 peptide 81–87), which went beyond the changes observed at their respective T50-SEC. Such extensive loss of backbone protection is consistent with the subunit dissociation observed by SEC that would expose the buried inter-subunit interface to the solvent. Furthermore, the fact that deuterium uptake at high temperature pre-pulses reaches nearly saturating values at 10–60 s in TM4a-c peptides 162–172 and 187–194 (Figure 6—figure supplement 1, cyan circles), strongly argues that there is also loss of secondary structure at the interfacial helices.
On the other hand, the HDX profile of the TranD differed greatly between EAAT1CO and EAAT1COCO at temperatures above their T50-SEC. In the latter, deuterium uptake remained unchanged in samples preheated at 55°C, demonstrating lack of significant structural changes (Figure 4—figure supplement 2b). In contrast, EAAT1CO preheated at 65°C showed an overall dramatic HDX increase in the TranD (e.g peptide 361–369 in HP1, 390–399 in TM7, and 483–495 in TM8) (Figure 4—figure supplement 1c) consistent with extensive unfolding of this domain, including the substrate and sodium binding sites, just as we observed in EAAT1WT. All together, these results show that the TranD of both EAAT1CO and EAAT1COCO have higher thermal stability than the respective ScaD, and remain folded at pre-pulse temperatures < 50°C.
Our thermal denaturation experiments show that increasing temperatures induce on one side loss of the trimeric state as monitored by SEC, as well as local unfolding that initially map to the inter-subunit interface, as indicated by HDX. Both types of structural changes are irreversible in nature and reflect the kinetic stability of the transporters, rather than their thermodynamic stability. Hence, the comparison between the T50 values for the subunit dissociation (T50-SEC) and those for the unfolding of individual peptides based on HDX (T50-HDX), offers a quantitative way to correlate the temporal course of the two processes.
With that aim in mind, we observed that peptides at the inter-subunit interface (174 – 184 and 187 – 194, TM4a-b) in both EAAT1CO and EAAT1COCO showed clear bimodal isotopic envelops in the mass spectra reflecting two populations of transporters with significantly different HDX dynamics. All other peptides were unimodal. Notably, the bimodal envelopes in TM4a-b were only present at pre-pulse temperatures close to the T50-SEC, in which the amplitudes of the high- and low-mass components were similar (Figure 5a,b). In contrast, at temperatures above and below T50-SEC the envelopes were nearly unimodal and dominated by the high- and low-mass components, respectively. Importantly, the HDX time course of the low-mass component at the T50-SEC was nearly identical to that of the reference condition (20°C) (Figure 5c,d), indicating that this component arises from trimeric and natively folded transporters. On the other hand, the HDX time course of the high-mass component at the T50-SEC resembled that observed at high pre-pulse temperatures (65°C and 55°C in EAAT1CO and EAAT1COCO, respectively), indicating that the high-mass component originates from denatured monomeric transporters in which TM4a-b are locally and partly unfolded. Therefore, we computed the temperature-induced changes in the amplitude of the low-mass component to estimate the T50 of interfacial peptides (T50-HDX-Bi) using Gaussian fitting. Peptides 174–184 and 187–194 in EAAT1CO showed T50-HDX-Bi values of 49.5°C and 48.8°C, respectively, while those in EAAT1COCO were 36.8°C and 42.4°C, respectively. The excellent agreement between T50-HDX-Bi and T50-SEC values shows that subunit dissociation and unfolding of the inter-subunit interface are highly correlated and simultaneous processes.
The above analyses can only be applied to peptides with bimodal isotopic envelopes, precluding a more extensive comparison of the local unfolding kinetics in other regions of the transporters. To overcome this problem, we calculated T50 values of individual peptides from the uptake kinetics of unimodal isotopic envelopes (T50-HDX-Uni). Briefly, the HDX kinetics of any detected peptide was well described by three components: an initial burst determined by uptake measured at 10 s (the first time point in the experiments); an intermediate component determined by uptake within 101–103 s (where most of our experimental measurements were done); and a slow component with uptake at longer times > 103 s. Despite the scarcity of experimental data covering this temporal window, with our longest uptake point measured at 3600 s, the slow component is required to reach saturating uptake values at pre-pulses ≤ 50°C (Figure 6a–c). The HDX kinetics of the structure regions of reference transporter samples (20°C) was dominated by the slow component, while the amplitude of the initial burst was nearly zero (Figure 6a,b; Figure 6—figure supplement 1). At increasing pre-pulse temperatures, the slow component gradually disappeared and instead, the HDX kinetics was dominated by the burst and/or the intermediate components reflecting loss of backbone protection. Therefore, we computed the temperature-induced changes of the slow component amplitude as a proxy for the loss of native folded state, and extracted the associated T50-HDX-Uni for individual peptides (Figure 6d).
Indeed, peptides covering the extracellular inter-subunit interface (174–184 and 187–194 in TM4a-b; and 81–88 in TM2) showed the lowest T50-HDX-Uni values that ranged between 50.6–52.8°C and 40.6–42.1°C in EAAT1CO and EAAT1COCO, respectively, demonstrating that unfolding of this region is the first structural change observed during thermal denaturation (Figure 6e,f). Notably, the excellent agreement between the T50-SEC obtained for the subunit dissociation and the T50-HDX-Uni, as well as the T50-HDX-Bi, show that the structural changes in TM4a-b, and possibly in TM2, are key rate-limiting steps that determine the thermal stability of the trimeric and functional state of the transporters. Interestingly, the T50-HDX-Uni values of peptides covering the TranD of EAAT1CO ranged between 52.8°C in the cytoplasmic end of TM3 to 56–58°C in HP1, TM7, and TM8, demonstrating that the regions involved in substrate and ion coordination unfold at later stages in the thermal denaturation pathway of the transporters.
EAAT1WT looses its transport function after purification in detergent solutions and shows extensive unfolding of several transmembrane regions important for oligomerization and transport function, highlighting the importance of the plasma membrane in stabilizing folded transporters. In stark contrast, EAAT1CO and EAAT1COCO remain functional and natively folded in detergent solutions, showing that the consensus exchanges effectively compensate for the destabilizing effect of detergent micelles and the lack of lipid bilayer, while conserving the neurotransmitter transport function.
Interestingly, the two consensus designs show similar sequence of temperature-induced structural changes suggesting a common thermal denaturation pathway (Figure 7). Moreover, the deuterium uptake pattern of EAAT1WT resembles that of EAAT1CO after being denatured by a 65°C pre-pulse suggesting that the wild type transporter might also unfold through a similar pathway. In this pathway, the initial structural changes map to the inter-subunit interface formed between TM4a-b and TM2 from different subunits, respectively. However, we are not able to rule out potential changes in other regions of that interface, particularly at the level TM4c and TM5, due to lack of sequence coverage in our HDX-MS experiments. Notably, the excellent quantitative agreement between the T50-HDX values of interfacial peptides and the T50-SEC in both EAAT1CO and EAAT1COCO, despite the ~10°C difference in stability, shows that unfolding of the inter-subunit interface is highly correlated to the loss of quaternary structure, and constitutes an important rate limiting step during the thermal denaturation of the transporters. Although, at present it is not possible to establish if the interfacial unfolding events are cause or effect of the subunit dissociation, they likely contribute to make such process irreversible.
In contrast, the TranD in the two consensus designs show no temporal correlation with the subunit dissociation and unfolds later in the pathway. Moreover, the TranD along with the substrate and ions binding sites in EAAT1CO and EAATCOCO have overall similar thermal stabilities, suggesting that the additional mutations present in the TranD of EAAT1CO (19 mutations), compared to EAAT1COCO, do not contribute strongly to the transporter stability.
The important question arises of what unfolding events cause the functional inactivation of the transporters? The transport experiments done with EAAT1COCO pre-heated at 55°C showed that the monomeric transporters are not functional. Yet, HDX analysis shows that under the same conditions the TranD domain is natively folded. Therefore one likely possibility is that despite the functional independence of the glutamate transporter subunits, they can only function in the context of the trimer to avoid that the substrate binding site and dynamic regions important for transport (e.g. HP2) become buried in the bilayer, or constrained by lipid or detergent molecules. Interestingly, we observed decreased deuterium uptake at the level of HP2 upon dissociation of the subunits in both EAAT1CO and EAAT1COCO, consistent with this hypothesis.
Our discovery of early unfolding events at the trimeric interface that determine the lifetime of the transporters opens the interesting possibility to target this region by mutagenesis, or even small-molecule compounds that could extend the half-life of the transporters and possibly act as the long-sought glutamate transport activators.
Using consensus-based mutagenesis approaches, we engineered increased kinetic stability to a human oligomeric and multidomain integral membrane protein of ~180 kDa (EAAT1), and trapped it in folded and functional states for biophysical analysis. Interestingly, consensus amino acids were identified from an alignment of two divergent branches of animal SLC1 proteins: sodium- and potassium-dependent glutamate transporters (EAAT1-5), as well sodium-dependent neutral amino acid transporters (ASCT1-2). The fact that our consensus designs show conserved sodium- and potassium-dependent glutamate transport function might simply reflect the higher number of sequences with such function in the alignment. More intriguing is the fact that the alignment includes exclusively SLC1 sequences from cold- and warm-blooded animals, and lacks those from thermophilic organisms. Pioneering work on soluble proteins has shown that individual consensus mutations have a higher chance to be stabilizing than random ones (Steipe, 2004; Steipe et al., 1994; Nikolova et al., 1998). In addition, protein evolution is driven by random mutagenesis to achieve specialized functions, and some degree of protein stability loss is expected during specialization, despite the acquisition of compensatory stabilizing mutations (Tokuriki and Tawfik, 2009). Hence, a sequence containing the most frequent amino acids among structural homologs, that is consensus amino acids, will on average filter out some of the non-stabilizing mutations acquired during the specialization of the individuals, and confer higher stability to the fold. Several expectations follow from this line of thought: first, the impact of consensus mutagenesis in protein stability should be smaller in protein families that have high selective pressure to retain stability, in other words, protein families in which stability is part of the specialized function. Although systematic studies will be needed to test this, the loss of stability observed in a full-consensus sequence of a highly thermostable soluble protein supports the above expectation (Dai et al., 2007). Second, less-specialized ancestral proteins are expected to be more stable than the extant specialized structural homologs. Indeed, gain of stability has been observed in several laboratory resurrections of ancestral soluble proteins (Gaucher et al., 2008; Perez-Jimenez et al., 2011; Risso et al., 2013; Wheeler et al., 2016). Third, in multi-domain proteins, conserved domains are expected to be more stable than divergent ones, since they contain more consensus residues. This is in fact what we observed in EAAT1, in which the conserved transport domain is more thermostable than the divergent scaffold domain.
In our second consensus design, EAAT1COCO, we tested the possibility that inter-residue contacts predicted by amino acid covariance are important for stability, and show that restricting the consensus mutations to highly covariant residue pairs yields folded and functional transporters. It is worth noting that in this COCO design, two different sequence alignments were used, one to determine the positions in the sequence to be mutated (curated alignment of the PFAM SLC1 family), and one to determine the identity of the consensus amino acids (alignment of animal SLC1 proteins). This is likely key to the success of the approach, since consensus amino acids from very divergent sequences, like those in the PFAM alignment that is dominated by prokaryotic SLC1 homologs, could disrupt important conserved interactions for the stability of the human transporters. In agreement to this, consensus mutations calculated from curated PFAM alignments of soluble enzymes, at strongly correlated positions, have shown detrimental effects on stability (Sullivan et al., 2011; Sullivan et al., 2012; Durani and Magliery, 2013).
The comparison between EAAT1CO and EAAT1COCO shows that the former is more stable than the latter. Clearly, one caveat in the design of EAAT1COCO is that the PFAM alignment has a strong phylogenetic bias for prokaryotes, and could include evolutionary coupled positions that are not important or even detrimental for the stability of human transporters. An additional explanation is that the consensus-covariance approach focuses on amino acid contacts and fails to capture other interactions like protein-lipid or protein-detergent that are important for membrane protein stability.
The consensus-based approaches presented here could be generalized to other human membrane protein families to obtain stable and functional proteins for structural, as well as biophysical analyses. An advantage over current methods like alanine scanning and direct evolution is that the consensus-based approaches reduce the number of constructs to be screened by nearly two orders of magnitude, since only a few synthetic genes need to be tested. However, a potential disadvantage is the larger number of mutations in the consensus designs compared to thermally stabilized animal and human membrane proteins obtained by the above-mentioned methods (Zhou and Bowie, 2000; Magnani et al., 2008; Sarkar et al., 2008; Coleman et al., 2016). Further work will be required to understand the impact of the depth and phylogenetic bias in the alignments used for the consensus designs, and to maximize protein stability while minimizing the number of consensus mutations.
Consensus amino acids were calculated using JALVIEW (Waterhouse et al., 2009) from 113 aligned sequences using Muscle (Edgar, 2004) of vertebrate homologs of the seven human SLC1 family members (Gesemann et al., 2010) (SLC1A1-7) (available in FASTA format in Supplementary file 1). A consensus amino acid at any position was defined as the most frequent amino acid, given that it shows a total frequency of appearance >~20%, and this frequency was ~ 10% higher than that of the corresponding amino acid in human EAAT1. To generate EAAT1CO, we simultaneously introduced all consensus amino acid exchanges defined as above in regions where secondary structure was predicted, based on the structures of GltPh (PDB 1XFH, 3KBC). To generate EAAT1COCO, we selected a subset of the consensus exchanges introduced in EAAT1CO at positions in the EAAT1 sequence that show strong amino acid covariance. Amino acid covariance was calculated with the EVcouplings server (http://evfold.org/evfold-web/evfold.do) (Marks et al., 2011) using the pseudo-likelihood maximization approach. The input for the calculations was a manually curated alignment of the PFAM ‘sodium:dicarboxylate symporter’ family (PF00375) with 4275 sequences of SLC1 homologs (available in FASTA format in Supplementary file 2), including prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms, and covering at least 70% of the human EAAT1 amino acid sequence (P43003-1 UniProt). From this analysis, the top covariance scored residue pairs predicted physical contacts (<6 Å apart) in the outward- and inward-facing state crystal structures of the prokaryotic homolog GltPh (PDB 1XFH, 3KBC) at a success rate of ~ 90%. Then, after removing false negative contacts using the above-mentioned GltPh trimeric structures, we focused the consensus amino acid exchanges to the top 100 amino acid pairs with the highest amino acid covariance scores to generate EAAT1COCO. It is important to emphasize here, that the covariance analysis was used only to select the subset of positions in the EAAT1 sequence where to preform the consensus amino acid exchanges. However, these exchanges were identical to those introduced in EAAT1CO, and calculated from the alignment of vertebrate SLC1 homologs. Hence, neither of the consensus designs carries mutations from distant prokaryotic homologs that dominate the PFAM alignment.
Synthetic genes codifying for EAAT1WT, EAAT1CO, and EAAT1COCO were codon optimized for expression in human cell-lines and purchased (DNA2.0 and Invitrogen). All genes were cloned into pcDNA3.1(+) (Invitrogen) with N-terminal Strep-tag II affinity tag followed by eGFP and PreScission protease cleavage site, and expressed in HEK293F cells (Thermo Fisher, mycoplasma test negative, and no authentication was attempted) grown in Excell293 medium (Sigma) and supplemented with 4 mM L-glutamine (Sigma) and 5 μg ml−1 Phenol red (Sigma-Aldrich) to densities of 2.5 × 106 cells ml−1. Cells were transiently transfected in Freestyle293 medium (Invitrogen) using 9 µg ml−1 polyethylenimine (PEI) (Polysciences) and 3 µg ml−1 of plasmid DNA, at a density of 2.5 × 106 cells ml−1, diluted with an equivalent volume of Excell293 6 hr after transfection, and treated with 2.2 mM valproic acid (Sigma) 12 hr after dilution of the cultures. Cells were collected at around 48 hr after transfection in 50 mM HEPES/Tris-base, pH 7.4, buffer supplemented with 1 mM L-Asp, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM TCEP, and 1:200 (v/v) dilution of mammalian protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma), and disrupted in an cell homogenizer (EmulsiFlex-C5, Avestin) after three runs at approximately 125,000 kPa. The resulting homogenate was clarified by centrifugation (4,500 g, 0.5 hr) and the crude membranes were collected by ultracentrifugation (186,000 g, 1.5 hr). Membranes were washed once with the above-mentioned buffer and finally homogenized with a douncer in a buffer containing 50 mM HEPES/Tris-base, pH 7.4, 200 mM NaCl, 1 mM L-Asp, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM TCEP, and 5% glycerol, snap-frozen in liquid N2 and stored at − 80°C at 0.25 g membranes ml−1. Membrane solubilization was done by thawing out and supplementing the membrane homogenate with 2% sucrose monododecanoate (DDS) and 0.4% cholesterol hemi-succinate (CHS). After 1 hr incubation, the insoluble material was removed by ultracentrifugation (186,000 g for 1 hr), and Strep-Tactin sepharose resin (GE Healthcare) was added to the supernatant and rotated for 2 hr. Resin was washed with 25 column volumes of 50 mM HEPES/Tris-base, pH 7.4, 200 mM NaCl, 1 mM L-Asp, 0.5 mM TCEP, 5% glycerol, 0.0632% DDS and 0.0126% CHS, and the protein was eluted with the same buffer supplemented with 2.5 mM L-desthiobiotin. The eluted eGFP-transporter fusion was concentrated to 500 μl using 100 kDa cutoff membranes (Millipore), ultra-centrifuged (86,900 g, 20 min), and applied to a Superose 6 10/300 gel filtration column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with 50 mM HEPES/Tris-base, pH 7.4, 200 mM NaCl, 1 mM L-Asp, 0.5 mM TCEP, 5% glycerol, 0.0632% DDS and 0.01264% CHS.
To study the thermal stability of the different constructs, the purified protein at a concentration of 0.2 mg ml−1 in 50 mM HEPES/Tris-base, pH 7.4, 200 mM NaCl, 1 mM L-Asp, 0.5 mM TCEP, 5% glycerol, 0.0632% DDS and 0.01264% CHS was diluted 1:20 in the same buffer, and incubated for 20 min at a single temperature in a C1000 Touch Thermal Cycler (BioRad). 100 µl of sample were ultra-centrifuged (86,900 g, 20 min) to clear the solution, and loaded in a 96-well microplate (Greiner Bio-One), for injection in an SRT-SEC-500 column (Sepax). The elution profiles were detected with a QuantaMaster 400 fluorometer (PTI) set at λex = 470 nm and λem = 514 nm using a flow-through cell (Starna). The area under the full chromatographic profile was integrated numerically and remained relatively constant at all temperatures studied (empty symbols Figure 3d–f). The fractional area corresponding to the trimeric transporters was calculated as the fraction of the area under the high molecular-weight peak (elution at ~3 ml) over the total area of the chromatogram. The values of the fractional areas corresponding to the trimeric transporters were fitted to a Hill equation of the form:
Norm. area = 1/(1+(T50-SEC/T)H) in which T50-SEC is the temperature at which half of the transporters are in the trimeric state, and H the Hill coefficient.
Unilamellar liposomes were made at 9:1 molar ratio of 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (Avanti Polar Lipids) and CHS, in a buffer containing 50 mM HEPES/Tris-base, pH 7.4, 200 mM NaCl and 1 mM L-Asp. To reconstitute the protein, liposomes were first mixed with DDS at a 1:2 (w/w) lipid-to-detergent ratio for 1 hr, and then the purified transporters were added at a 1:40 (w/w) protein-to-lipid ratio. Detergent removal was done at 4°C using SM-2 biobeads (BioRad) at 100 mg ml−1. The internal solution of the liposomes was exchanged using 10 freeze-thaw cycles in 50 mM HEPES/Tris-base, pH 7.4, and 200 mM KCl, unless indicated otherwise. After extrusion through 400 nm polycarbonate membranes (Avanti Polar Lipids), the proteoliposomes were concentrated by ultracentrifugation (150,000 g for 30 min at 4°C) and resuspended at 20 mg lipids ml−1, for immediate use. Substrate transport was assayed at 37°C. The uptake reaction was initiated by diluting the proteoliposomes tenfold into a buffer containing 50 mM HEPES/Tris-base, pH 7.4, 200 mM NaCl, 50 μM L-glutamate, 5 μM [14C] L-glutamate (PerkinElmer), and 2.5% glycerol. After 30 min, 200 μl aliquots were diluted fivefold into ice-cold quench buffer (50 mM HEPES/Tris-base, pH 7.4, 200 mM ChCl, and 2.5% glycerol), followed by immediate filtration and wash on nitrocellulose 0.22 μm filters (Millipore). Radioactivity was quantified by liquid scintillation using a Tri-Carb 3110TR counter (PerkinElmer). Background radioactivity was estimated from protein-free liposomes, and subtracted from the uptake data. The values were normalized by the amount of reconstituted protein, estimated by the level of GFP fluorescence measured in an Infinite M1000Pro microplate reader (Tecan). To titrate the rate of L-glutamate transport, proteoliposomes were assayed in the presence of 0, 5, 50 or 200 μM L-glutamate supplemented with 1, 5, 5, or 5 μM [14C] L-glutamate, respectively. At each substrate concentration, the initial rate of transport was calculated by a linear fit to 120 s and 180 s uptake measurements with origin fixed at zero. For the cell-based transport uptake, cells were collected 36 hr after transfection, and washed three times and resuspended at a density of 50 × 106 cells ml−1 in 11 mM HEPES/Tris-base, pH 7.4, 140 mM ChCl, 4.7 mM KCl, 2.5 mM CaCl2, 1.2 mM MgCl2, and 10 mM D-glucose, for immediate use. The uptake assay was performed similarly to the one described for the proteoliposomes, but using a reaction buffer containing 11 mM HEPES/Tris-base, pH 7.4, 140 mM NaCl, 4.7 mM KCl, 2.5 mM CaCl2, 1.2 mM MgCl2, 10 mM D-glucose, 50 μM L-glutamate, and 5 μM [14C] L-glutamate, and 0.8 μm nitrocellulose filters. Background radioactivity was estimated from cells transfected with empty vector, and subtracted from the uptake data.
HDX-MS experiments were performed with transporters purified as described above, but after removal of eGFP following elution. The eluted eGFP-transporter fusion was digested with PreScission protease overnight at 4°C, concentrated to 100 μL using 100 kDa cutoff membranes (Millipore), ultra-centrifuged for 20 min at 86,900 g, and finally applied to a Superose 6 5/150 gel filtration column equilibrated with 50 mM HEPES/Tris-base, 200 mM NaCl, pH 7.4, 1 mM L-Asp, 0.5 mM TCEP, 0.0632% DDS, 0.01264% CHS and 5% glycerol. To evaluate and compare the stability of the EAAT1 consensus designs by HDX-MS, the purified proteins were heated at a single pre-pulse temperature for 20 min in a C1000 Touch Thermal Cycler (BioRad), ultra-centrifuged (86,900 g, 20 min) to clear the solution, and further equilibrated for 1 hr at 20°C before deuterium labeling.
Deuterium exchange was initiated by adding 40 µL of D2O buffer (50 mM HEPES, pD 7.4, 200 mM NaCl, 1 mM L-Asp, 5% glycerol, 0.0632% DDS, 0.01264% CHS, 0.5 mM TCEP) to 10 µL of EAAT1 protein solution at ~5 µM (monomer concentration). Continuous labeling was performed at 20°C for t = 10, 60, 300, 1800 and 3,600 s. Aliquotes of 10 µL (10 pmoles) were withdrawn at each time point and quenched upon mixing with 50 µL of ice-cold quench buffer (0.75% formic acid, 5% glycerol) to reduce the pH to 2.5. Quenched samples were immediately snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C. Undeuterated controls were treated using an identical procedure. Experiments were performed in triplicate for each time point and condition.
8.3 pmol of quenched protein samples were injected into a nanoACQUITY UPLC HDX system (Waters) maintained at 0°C. Samples were on-line digested for 2 min at 100 µL/min and 20°C using an in-house packed immobilized pepsin cartridge (2.0 × 20 mm, 63 µL bed volume). The resulting peptides were trapped, concentrated and desalted onto a C18 Trap column (VanGuard BEH 1.7 µm, 2.1 × 5 mm, Waters) at a flow rate of 100 µL/min of 0.15% formic acid, and then separated in 8 min by a linear gradient of acetonitrile from 5% to 30% at 40 µL/min using an ACQUITY UPLCTM BEH C18 analytical column (1.7 µm, 1 × 100 mm, Waters). After each run, the pepsin cartridge was cleaned with two consecutive washes of 1% formic acid, 5% acetonitrile, 1.5 M guanidinium chloride, pH 2.5. Blank injections were performed between each run to confirm the absence of carry-over.
Mass spectra were acquired in positive and resolution mode on a Synapt G2-Si HDMS mass spectrometer (Waters) equipped with a standard ESI source and lock-spray correction (Glu-Fibrinogen peptide at 100 fmol/μL in 50% acetonitrile). Peptide maps were generated with the Protein LynX Global Server 3.0 (Waters) using MSE data collected on undeuterated controls. Each fragmentation spectrum was manually inspected to confirm the assignment. Deuterium uptake values were extracted using DynamX 3.0 (Waters). Only one unique charge state was considered per peptide and no adjustment was made for back-exchange; HDX-MS results are therefore reported as relative deuterium uptake values. Statistical analysis was performed with MEMHDX using a False Discovery Rate of 1% (Hourdel et al., 2016).
For each EAAT1 protein, bimodal m/z envelopes were first detected manually and corroborated with the binomial fitting approach implemented in HX-Express2 (Guttman et al., 2013). Double-Gaussian fitting to averaged m/z envelopes was used to determine the temperature-induced fractional changes of the low and high-m/z peptides’ components using Sigma Plot 12.0 (Systat Software Inc.). The fractional amplitude of the low m/z component as a function of the pre-pulse temperature was fitted to a Hill equation of the form (Figure 5e,f):
Fract. Amplitude = 1/(1+(T50-HDX-Bi/T)H)
Where H is the Hill coefficient (constrained to > −20), T is the pre-pulse temperature, and T50-HDX-Uni is the temperature at which the fraction of the low m/z component equals 0.5.
Deuterium uptake values were calculated from the centroid of unimodal isotopic m/z envelopes measured at 20°C in the absence of temperature pre-pulses. These values were fitted to a double exponential function of the form:
Deuterium Uptake= A0 + A1*[1-exp(k1*t)] + A2*[1-exp(k2*t)]
Where A0 is the amplitude of the initial deuterium uptake burst determined by uptake at 10 s, the shortest time point measured. A1 and A2 are the amplitudes, and k1 and k2 the rate constants of the intermediate and slow uptake components, respectively. In order to compare the deuterium uptake kinetics of EAAT1CO, EAAT1COCO, and EAAT1WT, we constrained the maximal amplitude of deuterium uptake (A0+A1+A2) in the fits to the maximal value observed in the EAAT1WT peptides, which showed clear saturating values at the longest time points measured (1800 and 3,600 s) in most cases (Figure 2, Figure 2—figure supplement 4). Using this constrain, dynamic peptides showed deuterium uptake kinetics with k1 values of ~10−1–10−2 s−1 and k2 values of <10−3 s−1, respectively, in both EAAT1CO and EAAT1COCO. For comparison the expected deuterium kinetics of fully unprotected peptides was estimated using an empirical overall HDX rate calculated with the SPHERE server (http://landing.foxchase.org/research/labs/roder/sphere/sphere.html). This rate was the sum of the individual exchange rates from the amide hydrogen atoms available for exchange in a peptide. The first amide in the peptide was systematically excluded.
The deuterium uptake values of EAAT1CO and EAAT1COCO samples pre-heated at different temperatures were also calculated from the centroids of unimodal isotopic envelopes and fitted to the same double exponential equation. However, in this analysis we used a global fitting protocol for the data of a given peptide at all pre-pulse temperatures measured, in which k1 and k2 parameters were shared for the data points at all temperatures. Moreover, the global fits were constrained to a maximal deuterium uptake value (A0+A1+A2) corresponding to the saturating values observed for a given peptide at the highest temperature measured, 65°C and 55°C for EAAT1CO and EAAT1COCO, respectively. Then, the fractional amplitude of the slow deuterium uptake component (A2/A0+A1+A2) was computed for each pre-pulse temperature, and normalized to the value measured at the reference temperature (20°C). The normalized fractional amplitude of the slow component as a function of temperature, for a given peptide, was finally fitted to a Hill equation of the form (Figure 6d, Figure 6—figure supplement 1):
Norm. Frac. Amplitude = 1/(1+(T50-HDX-Uni/T)H)
Where H is the Hill coefficient (constrained to > −20), T is the pre-pulse temperature, and T50-HDX-Uni is the temperature at which the fractional amplitude of the slow component equals 0.5.
Functional comparisons of three glutamate transporter subtypes cloned from human motor cortexThe Journal of Neuroscience 14:5559–5569.https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-09-05559.1994
The creation of a novel fluorescent protein by guided consensus engineeringProtein Engineering, Design and Selection 20:69–79.https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/gzl056
MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughputNucleic Acids Research 32:1792–1797.https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340
Protein Folding-How and why: by hydrogen exchange, fragment separation, and mass spectrometryAnnual Review of Biophysics 45:135–152.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biophys-062215-011121
Side-chain contributions to membrane protein structure and stabilityJournal of Molecular Biology 335:297–305.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2003.10.041
Partial purification of the sodium- and potassium-coupled L-glutamate transport glycoprotein from rat brainBiochimica Et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes 944:90–96.https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-2736(88)90320-3
Analysis of overlapped and noisy hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectraJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry 24:1906–1912.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13361-013-0727-5
From DNA sequence to improved functionality: using protein sequence comparisons to rapidly design a thermostable consensus phytaseProtein Engineering, Design and Selection 13:49–57.https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/13.1.49
Engineering proteins for thermostability: the use of sequence alignments versus rational design and directed evolutionCurrent Opinion in Biotechnology 12:371–375.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-1669(00)00229-9
Single-molecule paleoenzymology probes the chemistry of resurrected enzymesNature Structural & Molecular Biology 18:592–596.https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2020
Hyperstability and substrate promiscuity in laboratory resurrections of precambrian β-lactamasesJournal of the American Chemical Society 135:2899–2902.https://doi.org/10.1021/ja311630a
Rapid bioinformatic identification of thermostabilizing mutationsBiophysical Journal 109:1420–1428.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2015.07.026
Stabilizing membrane proteins through protein engineeringCurrent Opinion in Chemical Biology 17:427–435.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2013.04.002
Direct molecular evolution of detergent-stable G protein-coupled receptors using polymer encapsulated cellsJournal of Molecular Biology 425:662–677.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2012.11.015
Cholesterol is required for the reconstruction of the sodium- and chloride-coupled, gamma-aminobutyric acid transporter from rat brainThe Journal of Biological Chemistry 265:6002–6008.
Strategies for the purification of membrane proteinsMethods in Molecular Biology 1485:389–400.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6412-3_21
Sequence statistics reliably predict stabilizing mutations in a protein domainJournal of Molecular Biology 240:188–192.https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1994.1434
Mechanism of cation binding to the glutamate transporter EAAC1 probed with mutation of the conserved amino acid residue Thr101Journal of Biological Chemistry 285:17725–17733.https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.121798
Practical considerations of membrane protein instability during purification and crystallisationMethods in Molecular Biology 601:187–203.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-344-2_12
Stability effects of mutations and protein evolvabilityCurrent Opinion in Structural Biology 19:596–604.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2009.08.003
The thermostability and specificity of ancient proteinsCurrent Opinion in Structural Biology 38:37–43.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2016.05.015
José D Faraldo-GómezReviewing Editor; National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, United States
Richard AldrichSenior Editor; The University of Texas at Austin, United States
In the interests of transparency, eLife includes the editorial decision letter and accompanying author responses. A lightly edited version of the letter sent to the authors after peer review is shown, indicating the most substantive concerns; minor comments are not usually included.
Thank you for submitting your article "Consensus designs and thermal stability determinants of a human glutamate transporter" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by two peer reviewers, and the evaluation has been overseen by José D. Faraldo-Gómez as Reviewing Editor and Richard Aldrich as the Senior Editor. The following individuals involved in review of your submission have agreed to reveal their identity: Christopher G Tate (Reviewer #1).
The reviewers have discussed the reviews with one another and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this decision to help you prepare a revised submission.
Cirri et al. have performed detailed analyses on the thermal stability of a glutamate transporter, in the wild-type form as well as for thermally-stable variants identified through a computational sequence-based procedure. The manuscript is important in two ways. First, it details an approach that, if shown to be generalizable to other membrane proteins, would represent an important advancement in the structural biology field. Increasing the kinetic stability of membrane proteins without loss of function is a goal pursued by many, as it would facilitate the discovery of new architectures or new conformational states while ensuring the structural data is mechanistically relevant. The second key finding is that interactions at the interface between the so-called scaffold and transport domains are important determinants of the kinetic stability of this protein. It is plausible that this finding is transferable to other transporters whose functional mechanism entails relative motions between distinct structural domains.
1) The reviewers ask that the comparison between the rates in the text (subsection “Structural comparison between EAAT1 wild type and consensus designs”) and the data in Figure 2 be made clearer; that the latter are expressed in terms of (the reciprocal) time in the x-axis can be confusing. Also, the reviewers ask that the authors justify the double exponential fits to some of these data. Figure 2A for example certainly does not define a double exponential. The authors ought to specify what the values of the degrees of freedom are for these fits and/or if some parameters in the fitting equations are fixed, as well as the rationale to do so.
2) The authors must clarify whether conservation of mass was calculated for the gel filtration runs. The reviewers are surprised that the monomer (native or non-native) does not just stick to the column and never come off (slowing the flow rate and raising the pressure in the meantime). While some loss of this species would not change the overall findings of this manuscript, it could influence the population outcomes.
3) The authors should discuss the extent to which the success of the proposed method depends on the "manual curation" of sequences, and explain in detail the criteria used in this particular study as well as its rationale.https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.40110.023
1) The reviewers ask that the comparison between the rates in the text (subsection “Structural comparison between EAAT1 wild type and consensus designs”) and the data in Figure 2 be made clearer; that the latter are expressed in terms of (the reciprocal) time in the x-axis can be confusing.
To improve clarity, we revised the text and describe deuterium uptake time-courses in terms of Time only (not rates). The x-axis units in Figure 2A-C and Figure 2—figure supplement 5 are also seconds. The revised text reads: “The deuterium uptake time course of most peptides covering structured regions of the TranD and ScaD based on the structure of EAAT1CRYST showed slow deuterium incorporation that starts after ≥ 10 s, or even lacked any incorporation for up to 1 hour (Figure 2A-C and Figure 2—figure supplement 5)”
We also edited the initial paragraph in the Results section “Rate-limiting structural changes of thermal unfolding” in the same way for consistency. It now reads: “Briefly, the HDX kinetics of any detected peptide was well described by three components: an initial burst determined by uptake measured at 10 s (the first time point in the experiments); an intermediate component determined by uptake within 101-103 s (where most of our experimental measurements were done); and a slow component with uptake at longer times > 103 s.”
Also, the reviewers ask that the authors justify the double exponential fits to some of these data. Figure 2A for example certainly does not define a double exponential. The authors ought to specify what the values of the degrees of freedom are for these fits and/or if some parameters in the fitting equations are fixed, as well as the rationale to do so.
In order to compare the deuterium uptake kinetics of the three constructs, we constrained the saturating uptake level to that of the WT peptides at the longest time point (3600 s), because it is the closest experimental value we obtained to maximal uptake for a given peptide. This is explained in the Materials and methods section “HDX kinetic analysis”: “we constrained the maximal amplitude of deuterium uptake (A0+A1+A2) in the fits to the maximal value observed in the EAAT1WT peptides, which showed clear saturating values at the longest time points measured (1,800 and 3,600 s) in most cases (Figure 2 and Figure 2—figure supplement 4)”. We also refer to this section in the legend of Figure 2 for clarity.
Moreover, for most protected peptides in the consensus designs like 374-389 (Figure 2B and Figure 2—figure supplement 4), it is necessary to use a double exponential equation to fit the data and reach the maximal uptake value. For consistency, we used the double exponential fitting for all peptides, despite the fact that in a few examples like the one in Figure 2A, a single exponential could also fit the data. In any case, the main claim about uptake rates that we put forward in this section of the manuscript is independent of the fitting protocol: i.e. deuterium uptake of peptides in folded regions of the transporters, as predicted by the structure of EAAT1cryst, is orders of magnitude slower than expected for unfolded peptides of the same sequence and slower than observed experimentally for several peptides in EAAT1WT (e.g. peptide 397-404 Figure 2A or 374-389 Figure 2B).
2) The authors must clarify whether conservation of mass was calculated for the gel filtration runs. The reviewers are surprised that the monomer (native or non-native) does not just stick to the column and never come off (slowing the flow rate and raising the pressure in the meantime). While some loss of this species would not change the overall findings of this manuscript, it could influence the population outcomes.
Conservation of mass was calculated by numeric integration of the full chromatographic profiles. These so-called “total” areas obtained at different temperatures were then normalized to that at 4 °C for comparison across constructs, and are plotted as empty symbols in Figure 3D-F. We edited the legend of Figure 3, as well as the Materials and methods section “Protein expression, purification and size-exclusion chromatography” to improve clarity on this point.
As opposed to the area under the trimeric peak (solid symbols Figure 3D-F), the total areas are not temperature dependent, demonstrating protein mass conservation during pre-heating and ultracentrifugation. In addition, we do not observe any “clogging” signs in the SEC runs, like the ones mentioned by the Referee. Hence, we conclude that the consensus monomers (natively or partly folded) are soluble in detergent solutions under the reported conditions.
3) The authors should discuss the extent to which the success of the proposed method depends on the "manual curation" of sequences, and explain in detail the criteria used in this particular study as well as its rationale.
We don’t believe that manual curation of sequences plays an important role in the successful application of the method. First, there was no “manual curation” of sequences in the design of EAAT1CO. Second, the manual curation involved in the design of EAAT1COCO was done over the PFAM sequences to remove those that cover < 70% of the amino acid length of the target (EAAT1). This is important for the calculation of the amino acid covariance, and it can be done with the EVcouplings server as well, with similar results. We just noted a slightly lower rate of false-positives between co-evolved pairs and physical contacts when using “manually curated” sequences over “server-curated” sequence, but we do not think that it would have an impact on the outcome of the method. We added the following sentences in the Materials and methods section “Consensus designs” to reflect this: “Automated curation of PFAM sequences using the EVcouplings server yielded similar results”.https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.40110.024
- Nicolas Reyes
- Julia Chamot-Rooke
- Nicolas Reyes
- Julia Chamot-Rooke
- Nicolas Reyes
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
We thank Olga Boudker for discussion on consensus mutagenesis; Petya V Krasteva for comments on the manuscript. The work was funded by the ERC Starting grant 309657 (NR). Further support from G5 Institut Pasteur funds (NR), CACSICE grant (ANR-11-EQPX-008), and CNRS UMR3528 (NR, JC-R.) is acknowledged.
- Richard Aldrich, The University of Texas at Austin, United States
- José D Faraldo-Gómez, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, United States
© 2018, Cirri et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.