Light-at-night exposure affects brain development through pineal allopregnanolone-dependent mechanisms

Abstract

The molecular mechanisms by which environmental light conditions affect cerebellar development are incompletely understood. We showed that circadian disruption by light-at-night induced Purkinje cell death through pineal allopregnanolone (ALLO) activity during early life in chicks. Light-at-night caused the loss of diurnal variation of pineal ALLO synthesis during early life and led to cerebellar Purkinje cell death, which was suppressed by a daily injection of ALLO. The loss of diurnal variation of pineal ALLO synthesis induced not only reduction in pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP), a neuroprotective hormone, but also transcriptional repression of the cerebellar Adcyap1 gene that produces PACAP, with subsequent Purkinje cell death. Taken together, pineal ALLO mediated the effect of light on early cerebellar development in chicks.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files for Figures 1-10 have been deposited to Dryad DOI: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.k6g8b53

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Shogo Haraguchi

    Department of Biology, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan
    For correspondence
    shogo.haraguchi@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8731-3311
  2. Masaki Kamata

    Department of Biology, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Takuma Tokita

    Department of Biology, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Kei-ichiro Tashiro

    Department of Biology, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Miku Sato

    Department of Biology, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Mitsuki Nozaki

    Department of Biology, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Mayumi Okamoto-Katsuyama

    Department of Applied Chemistry, School of Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Isao Shimizu

    Department of Applied Chemistry, School of Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Guofeng Han

    Laboratory of Stress Physiology and Metabolism, Graduate School of Bioresource and Bioenvironmental Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Vishwajit Sur Chowdhury

    Laboratory of Stress Physiology and Metabolism, Graduate School of Bioresource and Bioenvironmental Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Xiao-Feng Lei

    Department of Biochemistry, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Takuro Miyazaki

    Department of Biochemistry, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Joo-ri Kim-Kaneyama

    Department of Biochemistry, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Tomoya Nakamachi

    Laboratory of Regulatory Biology, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Kouhei Matsuda

    Laboratory of Regulatory Biology, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8253-5230
  16. Hirokazu Ohtaki

    Department of Anatomy, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Toshinobu Tokumoto

    Integrated Bioscience Section, Graduate School of Science and Technology, Shizuoka University, Shizuoka, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Tetsuya Tachibana

    Department of Agrobiological Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Akira Miyazaki

    Department of Biochemistry, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  20. Kazuyoshi Tsutsui

    Department of Biology, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan
    For correspondence
    k-tsutsui@waseda.jp
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (15K18571)

  • Shogo Haraguchi

Takeda Science Foundation

  • Shogo Haraguchi

Ichiro Kanehara Foundation for the Promotion of Medical Sciences and Medical Care

  • Shogo Haraguchi

Kao Corporation

  • Shogo Haraguchi

Naito Foundation

  • Shogo Haraguchi

Narishige Zoological Science Foundation

  • Shogo Haraguchi

Yamaguchi Endocrine Research Foundation

  • Shogo Haraguchi

Suntory Foundation for Life Sciences

  • Shogo Haraguchi

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (22227002)

  • Kazuyoshi Tsutsui

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Vatsala Thirumalai, National Centre for Biological Sciences, India

Ethics

Animal experimentation: The experimental protocols (2011-A090, 2012-A003, 2013-A010, 2014-A063, 2015-A012, 29M050, 30M047) were in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of Waseda University or Showa University, Japan.

Version history

  1. Received: January 18, 2019
  2. Accepted: September 29, 2019
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: September 30, 2019 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: November 12, 2019 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2019, Haraguchi et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,071
    views
  • 301
    downloads
  • 21
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Shogo Haraguchi
  2. Masaki Kamata
  3. Takuma Tokita
  4. Kei-ichiro Tashiro
  5. Miku Sato
  6. Mitsuki Nozaki
  7. Mayumi Okamoto-Katsuyama
  8. Isao Shimizu
  9. Guofeng Han
  10. Vishwajit Sur Chowdhury
  11. Xiao-Feng Lei
  12. Takuro Miyazaki
  13. Joo-ri Kim-Kaneyama
  14. Tomoya Nakamachi
  15. Kouhei Matsuda
  16. Hirokazu Ohtaki
  17. Toshinobu Tokumoto
  18. Tetsuya Tachibana
  19. Akira Miyazaki
  20. Kazuyoshi Tsutsui
(2019)
Light-at-night exposure affects brain development through pineal allopregnanolone-dependent mechanisms
eLife 8:e45306.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45306

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45306

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Yali Pan, Steven Frisson ... Ole Jensen
    Research Article

    Humans can read and comprehend text rapidly, implying that readers might process multiple words per fixation. However, the extent to which parafoveal words are previewed and integrated into the evolving sentence context remains disputed. We investigated parafoveal processing during natural reading by recording brain activity and eye movements using MEG and an eye tracker while participants silently read one-line sentences. The sentences contained an unpredictable target word that was either congruent or incongruent with the sentence context. To measure parafoveal processing, we flickered the target words at 60 Hz and measured the resulting brain responses (i.e. Rapid Invisible Frequency Tagging, RIFT) during fixations on the pre-target words. Our results revealed a significantly weaker tagging response for target words that were incongruent with the previous context compared to congruent ones, even within 100ms of fixating the word immediately preceding the target. This reduction in the RIFT response was also found to be predictive of individual reading speed. We conclude that semantic information is not only extracted from the parafovea but can also be integrated with the previous context before the word is fixated. This early and extensive parafoveal processing supports the rapid word processing required for natural reading. Our study suggests that theoretical frameworks of natural reading should incorporate the concept of deep parafoveal processing.

    1. Neuroscience
    Jack W Lindsey, Elias B Issa
    Research Article

    Object classification has been proposed as a principal objective of the primate ventral visual stream and has been used as an optimization target for deep neural network models (DNNs) of the visual system. However, visual brain areas represent many different types of information, and optimizing for classification of object identity alone does not constrain how other information may be encoded in visual representations. Information about different scene parameters may be discarded altogether (‘invariance’), represented in non-interfering subspaces of population activity (‘factorization’) or encoded in an entangled fashion. In this work, we provide evidence that factorization is a normative principle of biological visual representations. In the monkey ventral visual hierarchy, we found that factorization of object pose and background information from object identity increased in higher-level regions and strongly contributed to improving object identity decoding performance. We then conducted a large-scale analysis of factorization of individual scene parameters – lighting, background, camera viewpoint, and object pose – in a diverse library of DNN models of the visual system. Models which best matched neural, fMRI, and behavioral data from both monkeys and humans across 12 datasets tended to be those which factorized scene parameters most strongly. Notably, invariance to these parameters was not as consistently associated with matches to neural and behavioral data, suggesting that maintaining non-class information in factorized activity subspaces is often preferred to dropping it altogether. Thus, we propose that factorization of visual scene information is a widely used strategy in brains and DNN models thereof.