Brain Development: The impact of light during the night

Exposing chicks to one hour of light during the night disrupts the releaseof a hormone that is needed by cells in the developing brain to survive.
  1. Sophia TC Leung
  2. R Anne McKinney
  3. Alanna J Watt  Is a corresponding author
  1. McGill University, Canada

Modern life exposes us to multiple sources of artificial light at times when we normally would experience darkness. You could, for example, be reading this article at night on the glowing screen of a computer or tablet. There is mounting evidence, however, that irregular 'light-at-night' can affect mood and brain function (Bedrosian and Nelson, 2017). The developing brain is particularly sensitive to night-time light (Logan and McClung, 2019), and this could result in changes that persist into adult life.

Now, in eLife, Shogo Haraguchi, Kazuyoshi Tsutsui and colleagues at Waseda University, Showa University School of Medicine and other institutes in Japan report that inappropriate light-at-night can have adverse long-term effects on the survival of nerve cells in the developing brain of chicks (Haraguchi et al., 2019). Chicks are an ideal model system for studying how light affects the developing brain because, like people, chickens are diurnal (i.e., they are active during the day and sleep at night).

Haraguchi et al. focused on a small gland located deep in the brain called the pineal gland, which regulates the sleep-wake cycle by producing and releasing a hormone known as melatonin (Borjigin et al., 2012). The pineal gland synthesizes melatonin in rhythmic cycles, releasing low levels during the day and high levels at night. However, the release of melatonin during the night can be suppressed by exposure to bright light. In addition to melatonin, the pineal gland also produces and releases various steroids, including a steroid called ALLO (short for allopregnanolone; Haraguchi et al., 2012).

Haraguchi et al. showed that when hatchling chicks were repeatedly exposed to 12 hours of light followed by 12 hours of darkness, ALLO expression in the pineal gland peaked four hours into the dark cycle (at hour 16 of the 24-hour cycle). However, when the chicks were exposed to constant light, ALLO levels remained low and the peak in expression during the dark cycle could no longer be detected. Notably, exposing chicks to just one hour of light during the night (14-15 hours into the cycle) was enough to abolish the peak in ALLO synthesis (Figure 1).

Light-at-night and the developing brain.

When developing chicks are exposed to repeated cycles of 12 hours of light and 12 hours of darkness (top panel), they release a hormone called ALLO from the pineal gland during the dark phase. However, when the chicks were exposed to one hour of light during the night for a week (bottom panel), the release of ALLO was disrupted, and this resulted in the death of Purkinje cells in the part of the cerebellum that is next to the pineal gland (live cells are shown in green; dead cells are shown in gray).

Image credit: Sophia Leung

Next, Haraguchi et al. determined how changes in ALLO expression affected the development of Purkinje cells in the cerebellum: this region of the brain, which is located next to the pineal gland, is important for motor coordination and cognition (Koziol et al., 2014). They found that exposing chicks to constant light, or one hour of aberrant light per night, the week after hatching caused an increase in the death of Purkinje cells: moreover, these losses were observed predominantly in the part of the cerebellum closest to the pineal gland and persisted into young adulthood (Figure 1). Further experiments showed that the Purkinje cells did not die when chicks exposed to one hour of light per night were injected with a daily dose of ALLO. This suggests that Purkinje cells in the developing brain need ALLO in order to survive.

To determine the underlying mechanisms that cause Purkinje cell death, Haraguchi et al. carried out a series of experiments in which they down-regulated the expression of specific proteins in the egg. This revealed that ALLO acted via a receptor on the cell membrane known as mPRα, and this led to daily peaks in expression of a neuroprotective hormone called PACAP during the dark phase of the cycle. Epigenetic regulation of the gene that controls PACAP during development caused expression levels of this hormone to vary between chicks. Chicks exposed to night-time light in the second week after hatching also experienced Purkinje cell death. However, the damage caused by this later exposure could be rescued by PACAP, but not by the addition of ALLO. This suggests that the actions of light-at-night in the brain may involve different pathways at different stages of development.

Purkinje cell death is observed in several neurological disorders, including autism (Jayabal and Watt, 2019), and the pattern of Purkinje cell death following light-at-night exposure during development is similar to the patterns of cell death observed in several ataxia disorders that affect motor coordination (Langmade et al., 2006; Larivière et al., 2015). Since disrupted sleep is a common component of many ataxia disorders (Huebra et al., 2019), this study suggests that cell survival in neurogenerative diseases may be linked to changes in neurosteroid production caused by interrupted sleep.

Caution, however, must be taken when translating these results to humans, since the stages of brain development in chicks are not directly comparable to humans. Nonetheless, this study raises important concerns about how light exposure at night affects the developing brain. In addition to helping you get a good night’s sleep, turning off screens and shutting blinds at night may help maintain the production of a neurosteroid that cells in the developing brain need to survive.

References

  1. Book
    1. Jayabal S
    2. Watt AJ
    (2019) Development of Physiological Activity in the Cerebellum
    In: Manto M. G. D, Schmahmann J, Koibuchi N, Sillitoe R, editors. Handbook of the Cerebellum and Cerebellar Disorders. Springer. pp. 1–30.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97911-3_111-2

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sophia TC Leung

    Sophia TC Leung is in the Department of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada

    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2158-4300
  2. R Anne McKinney

    R Anne McKinney is in the Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada

    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  3. Alanna J Watt

    Alanna J Watt is in the Department of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada

    For correspondence
    alanna.watt@mcgill.ca
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6371-6220

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published: November 12, 2019 (version 1)

Copyright

© 2019, Leung et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,619
    Page views
  • 161
    Downloads
  • 3
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Sophia TC Leung
  2. R Anne McKinney
  3. Alanna J Watt
(2019)
Brain Development: The impact of light during the night
eLife 8:e52364.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.52364

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Ling Bai et al.
    Research Article Updated

    Animals must learn through experience which foods are nutritious and should be consumed, and which are toxic and should be avoided. Enteroendocrine cells (EECs) are the principal chemosensors in the GI tract, but investigation of their role in behavior has been limited by the difficulty of selectively targeting these cells in vivo. Here, we describe an intersectional genetic approach for manipulating EEC subtypes in behaving mice. We show that multiple EEC subtypes inhibit food intake but have different effects on learning. Conditioned flavor preference is driven by release of cholecystokinin whereas conditioned taste aversion is mediated by serotonin and substance P. These positive and negative valence signals are transmitted by vagal and spinal afferents, respectively. These findings establish a cellular basis for how chemosensing in the gut drives learning about food.

    1. Neuroscience
    Kelly M Martyniuk et al.
    Research Article Updated

    In the striatum, acetylcholine (ACh) neuron activity is modulated co-incident with dopamine (DA) release in response to unpredicted rewards and reward-predicting cues and both neuromodulators are thought to regulate each other. While this co-regulation has been studied using stimulation studies, the existence of this mutual regulation in vivo during natural behavior is still largely unexplored. One long-standing controversy has been whether striatal DA is responsible for the induction of the cholinergic pause or whether DA D2 receptors (D2Rs) modulate a pause that is induced by other mechanisms. Here, we used genetically encoded sensors in combination with pharmacological and genetic inactivation of D2Rs from cholinergic interneurons (CINs) to simultaneously measure ACh and DA levels after CIN D2R inactivation in mice. We found that CIN D2Rs are not necessary for the initiation of cue-induced decrease in ACh levels. Rather, they prolong the duration of the decrease and inhibit ACh rebound levels. Notably, the change in cue-evoked ACh levels is not associated with altered cue-evoked DA release. Moreover, D2R inactivation strongly decreased the temporal correlation between DA and ACh signals not only at cue presentation but also during the intertrial interval pointing to a general mechanism by which D2Rs coordinate both signals. At the behavioral level D2R antagonism increased the latency to lever press, which was not observed in CIN-selective D2R knock out mice. Press latency correlated with the cue-evoked decrease in ACh levels and artificial inhibition of CINs revealed that longer inhibition shortens the latency to press compared to shorter inhibition. This supports a role of the ACh signal and it’s regulation by D2Rs in the motivation to initiate actions.