Brain Development: The impact of light during the night
Exposing chicks to one hour of light during the night disrupts the releaseof a hormone that is needed by cells in the developing brain to survive.
- McGill University, Canada
Modern life exposes us to multiple sources of artificial light at times when we normally would experience darkness. You could, for example, be reading this article at night on the glowing screen of a computer or tablet. There is mounting evidence, however, that irregular 'light-at-night' can affect mood and brain function (Bedrosian and Nelson, 2017). The developing brain is particularly sensitive to night-time light (Logan and McClung, 2019), and this could result in changes that persist into adult life.
Now, in eLife, Shogo Haraguchi, Kazuyoshi Tsutsui and colleagues at Waseda University, Showa University School of Medicine and other institutes in Japan report that inappropriate light-at-night can have adverse long-term effects on the survival of nerve cells in the developing brain of chicks (Haraguchi et al., 2019). Chicks are an ideal model system for studying how light affects the developing brain because, like people, chickens are diurnal (i.e., they are active during the day and sleep at night).
Haraguchi et al. focused on a small gland located deep in the brain called the pineal gland, which regulates the sleep-wake cycle by producing and releasing a hormone known as melatonin (Borjigin et al., 2012). The pineal gland synthesizes melatonin in rhythmic cycles, releasing low levels during the day and high levels at night. However, the release of melatonin during the night can be suppressed by exposure to bright light. In addition to melatonin, the pineal gland also produces and releases various steroids, including a steroid called ALLO (short for allopregnanolone; Haraguchi et al., 2012).
Haraguchi et al. showed that when hatchling chicks were repeatedly exposed to 12 hours of light followed by 12 hours of darkness, ALLO expression in the pineal gland peaked four hours into the dark cycle (at hour 16 of the 24-hour cycle). However, when the chicks were exposed to constant light, ALLO levels remained low and the peak in expression during the dark cycle could no longer be detected. Notably, exposing chicks to just one hour of light during the night (14-15 hours into the cycle) was enough to abolish the peak in ALLO synthesis (Figure 1).
Figure 1
Light-at-night and the developing brain.
When developing chicks are exposed to repeated cycles of 12 hours of light and 12 hours of darkness (top panel), they release a hormone called ALLO from the pineal gland during the dark phase. However, when the chicks were exposed to one hour of light during the night for a week (bottom panel), the release of ALLO was disrupted, and this resulted in the death of Purkinje cells in the part of the cerebellum that is next to the pineal gland (live cells are shown in green; dead cells are shown in gray).
Image credit: Sophia Leung
Next, Haraguchi et al. determined how changes in ALLO expression affected the development of Purkinje cells in the cerebellum: this region of the brain, which is located next to the pineal gland, is important for motor coordination and cognition (Koziol et al., 2014). They found that exposing chicks to constant light, or one hour of aberrant light per night, the week after hatching caused an increase in the death of Purkinje cells: moreover, these losses were observed predominantly in the part of the cerebellum closest to the pineal gland and persisted into young adulthood (Figure 1). Further experiments showed that the Purkinje cells did not die when chicks exposed to one hour of light per night were injected with a daily dose of ALLO. This suggests that Purkinje cells in the developing brain need ALLO in order to survive.
To determine the underlying mechanisms that cause Purkinje cell death, Haraguchi et al. carried out a series of experiments in which they down-regulated the expression of specific proteins in the egg. This revealed that ALLO acted via a receptor on the cell membrane known as mPRα, and this led to daily peaks in expression of a neuroprotective hormone called PACAP during the dark phase of the cycle. Epigenetic regulation of the gene that controls PACAP during development caused expression levels of this hormone to vary between chicks. Chicks exposed to night-time light in the second week after hatching also experienced Purkinje cell death. However, the damage caused by this later exposure could be rescued by PACAP, but not by the addition of ALLO. This suggests that the actions of light-at-night in the brain may involve different pathways at different stages of development.
Purkinje cell death is observed in several neurological disorders, including autism (Jayabal and Watt, 2019), and the pattern of Purkinje cell death following light-at-night exposure during development is similar to the patterns of cell death observed in several ataxia disorders that affect motor coordination (Langmade et al., 2006; Larivière et al., 2015). Since disrupted sleep is a common component of many ataxia disorders (Huebra et al., 2019), this study suggests that cell survival in neurogenerative diseases may be linked to changes in neurosteroid production caused by interrupted sleep.
Caution, however, must be taken when translating these results to humans, since the stages of brain development in chicks are not directly comparable to humans. Nonetheless, this study raises important concerns about how light exposure at night affects the developing brain. In addition to helping you get a good night’s sleep, turning off screens and shutting blinds at night may help maintain the production of a neurosteroid that cells in the developing brain need to survive.
References
-
Timing of light exposure affects mood and brain circuitsTranslational Psychiatry 7:e1017.https://doi.org/10.1038/tp.2016.262
-
Circadian regulation of pineal gland rhythmicityMolecular and Cellular Endocrinology 349:13–19.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2011.07.009
-
Sleep disorders in hereditary ataxiasCurrent Neurology and Neuroscience Reports 19:59.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-019-0968-1
-
BookDevelopment of Physiological Activity in the CerebellumIn: Manto M. G. D, Schmahmann J, Koibuchi N, Sillitoe R, editors. Handbook of the Cerebellum and Cerebellar Disorders. Springer. pp. 1–30.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97911-3_111-2
-
Rhythms of life: circadian disruption and brain disorders across the lifespanNature Reviews Neuroscience 20:49–65.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-018-0088-y
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
- Version of Record published: November 12, 2019 (version 1)
Copyright
© 2019, Leung et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 3,244
- views
-
- 177
- downloads
-
- 3
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Brain Development: The impact of light during the night
eLife 8:e52364.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.52364
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
Humans can read and comprehend text rapidly, implying that readers might process multiple words per fixation. However, the extent to which parafoveal words are previewed and integrated into the evolving sentence context remains disputed. We investigated parafoveal processing during natural reading by recording brain activity and eye movements using MEG and an eye tracker while participants silently read one-line sentences. The sentences contained an unpredictable target word that was either congruent or incongruent with the sentence context. To measure parafoveal processing, we flickered the target words at 60 Hz and measured the resulting brain responses (i.e. Rapid Invisible Frequency Tagging, RIFT) during fixations on the pre-target words. Our results revealed a significantly weaker tagging response for target words that were incongruent with the previous context compared to congruent ones, even within 100ms of fixating the word immediately preceding the target. This reduction in the RIFT response was also found to be predictive of individual reading speed. We conclude that semantic information is not only extracted from the parafovea but can also be integrated with the previous context before the word is fixated. This early and extensive parafoveal processing supports the rapid word processing required for natural reading. Our study suggests that theoretical frameworks of natural reading should incorporate the concept of deep parafoveal processing.
-
- Neuroscience
Object classification has been proposed as a principal objective of the primate ventral visual stream and has been used as an optimization target for deep neural network models (DNNs) of the visual system. However, visual brain areas represent many different types of information, and optimizing for classification of object identity alone does not constrain how other information may be encoded in visual representations. Information about different scene parameters may be discarded altogether (‘invariance’), represented in non-interfering subspaces of population activity (‘factorization’) or encoded in an entangled fashion. In this work, we provide evidence that factorization is a normative principle of biological visual representations. In the monkey ventral visual hierarchy, we found that factorization of object pose and background information from object identity increased in higher-level regions and strongly contributed to improving object identity decoding performance. We then conducted a large-scale analysis of factorization of individual scene parameters – lighting, background, camera viewpoint, and object pose – in a diverse library of DNN models of the visual system. Models which best matched neural, fMRI, and behavioral data from both monkeys and humans across 12 datasets tended to be those which factorized scene parameters most strongly. Notably, invariance to these parameters was not as consistently associated with matches to neural and behavioral data, suggesting that maintaining non-class information in factorized activity subspaces is often preferred to dropping it altogether. Thus, we propose that factorization of visual scene information is a widely used strategy in brains and DNN models thereof.
