Overtone focusing in biphonic Tuvan throat singing

  1. Christopher Bergevin  Is a corresponding author
  2. Chandan Narayan
  3. Joy Williams
  4. Natasha Mhatre
  5. Jennifer Steeves
  6. Joshua GW Bernstein
  7. Brad Story  Is a corresponding author
  1. York University, Canada
  2. Western University, Canada
  3. Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, United States
  4. University of Arizona, United States

Abstract

Khoomei is a unique singing style originating from the Central Asian republic of Tuva. Singers produce two pitches simultaneously: a booming low-frequency rumble alongside a hovering high-pitched whistle-like tone. The biomechanics of this biphonation are not well-understood. Here, we use sound analysis, dynamic magnetic resonance imaging, and vocal tract modeling to demonstrate how biphonation is achieved by modulating vocal tract morphology. Tuvan singers show remarkable control in shaping their vocal tract to narrowly focus the harmonics (or overtones) emanating from their vocal cords. The biphonic sound is a combination of the fundamental pitch and a focused filter state, which is at the higher pitch (1-2 kHz) and formed by merging two formants, thereby greatly enhancing sound-production in a very narrow frequency range. Most importantly, we demonstrate that this biphonation is a phenomenon arising from linear filtering rather than a nonlinear source.

Data availability

All data files (audio and imaging), as well as the relevant analysis software, are available via datadryad.org, https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.cvdncjt14

The following data sets were generated
    1. Bergevin
    2. Christopher
    (2020) Overtone focusing in biphonic Tuvan throat singing
    Dryad Digital Repository, https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.cvdncjt14.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Christopher Bergevin

    Physics and Astronomy, York University, Toronto, Canada
    For correspondence
    cberge@yorku.ca
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4529-399X
  2. Chandan Narayan

    Languages, Literatures and Linguistics, York University, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Joy Williams

    York MRI Facility, York University, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Natasha Mhatre

    Biology, Western University, London, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3618-306X
  5. Jennifer Steeves

    Psychology, York University, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Joshua GW Bernstein

    National Military Audiology and Speech Pathology Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Brad Story

    Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, United States
    For correspondence
    bstory@email.arizona.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-430761-2013)

  • Christopher Bergevin

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Timothy D Griffiths, University of Newcastle, United Kingdom

Ethics

Human subjects: Data were collected with approval of the York University Institutional Review Board (IRB protocol to Prof. Jennifer Steeves) This study was approved by the Human Participants Review Board of the Office of Research Ethics at York University (certificate #2017-132) and adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants gave informed written consent and consent to publish prior to their inclusion in the study.

Version history

  1. Received: July 24, 2019
  2. Accepted: January 31, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: February 12, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: February 17, 2020 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record published: March 10, 2020 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2020, Bergevin et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 10,780
    views
  • 446
    downloads
  • 7
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Christopher Bergevin
  2. Chandan Narayan
  3. Joy Williams
  4. Natasha Mhatre
  5. Jennifer Steeves
  6. Joshua GW Bernstein
  7. Brad Story
(2020)
Overtone focusing in biphonic Tuvan throat singing
eLife 9:e50476.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.50476

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.50476

Further reading

  1. A new study reveals how throat singing is produced.

    1. Physics of Living Systems
    Nicholas LaBerge, Kenneth Hunter Wapman ... Daniel B Larremore
    Research Article

    Despite long-running efforts to increase gender diversity among tenured and tenure-track faculty in the U.S., women remain underrepresented in most academic fields, sometimes dramatically so. Here, we quantify the relative importance of faculty hiring and faculty attrition for both past and future faculty gender diversity using comprehensive data on the training and employment of 268,769 tenured and tenure-track faculty rostered at 12,112U.S. PhD-granting departments, spanning 111 academic fields between 2011 and 2020. Over this time, we find that hiring had a far greater impact on women’s representation among faculty than attrition in the majority (90.1%) of academic fields, even as academia loses a higher share of women faculty relative to men at every career stage. Finally, we model the impact of five specific policy interventions on women’s representation, and project that eliminating attrition differences between women and men only leads to a marginal increase in women’s overall representation—in most fields, successful interventions will need to make substantial and sustained changes to hiring in order to reach gender parity.