Protein Homeostasis: How chloroplasts protect themselves from unfolded proteins

A genetic screen has identified the first signaling component of the unfolded protein response in chloroplasts.
  1. Felix Kessler  Is a corresponding author
  2. Paolo Longoni
  1. University of Neuchâtel, Switzerland

Eukaryotic cells contain organelles that perform specific roles. The chloroplasts in algae and plants, for example, harvest the energy from sunlight to produce organic molecules via photosynthesis. An organelle must import proteins from the cytoplasm to perform its role: however, these proteins have to be unfolded when they are imported, so they must be rapidly processed and folded once they are inside the organelle. If proteins that are not correctly folded accumulate, they can become toxic, and must be detected and removed in order to protect the organelle from damage.

A quality control system consisting of small heat shock proteins, chaperones and proteases ensures that all proteins entering the chloroplast are properly folded. However, when algae are exposed to high levels of light, or when a protease called ClpP1 is missing, this quality control system can become compromised and overwhelmed by unfolded proteins. This causes the chloroplast to trigger an ‘unfolded protein response’ (UPR) that upregulates the production of various proteins in the nucleus, which then travel to the chloroplast to help it cope with this overload of unfolded proteins. Although the UPR is well-understood in other organelles, such as the ER and mitochondria, the UPR in chloroplasts has been described to a far lesser degree. For example, it remains unclear how the chloroplast monitors the level of unfolded proteins and communicates this information to the nucleus.

Now, in eLife, Silvia Ramundo of the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) and colleagues – including Karina Perlaza as first author – report how they used a genetic screen to discover the first signaling component of chloroplast unfolded protein response (cpUPR) in the algae Chlamydomonas reinhardti (Perlaza et al., 2019). To create the screen, the researchers used an inducible switch that blocks the production of the ClpP1 protease: this blocking causes unfolded proteins to accumulate inside the chloroplast, triggering the cpUPR (Figure 1; Ramundo et al., 2014; Ramundo and Rochaix, 2014). To monitor the response, algae were engineered to express a fluorescent reporter that was under the control of a nuclear expressed gene that only becomes upregulated when the cpUPR is switched on. Perlaza et al. then inserted random mutations into the genome of these engineered algae, and screened for mutants that were no longer displaying fluorescence despite having activated the cpUPR (Figure 1).

The unfolded protein response in chloroplasts.

In wild-type C. reinhardti algae a protease called ClpP1 is responsible for removing unfolded proteins produced by stress (left). The loss of ClpP1 (right) leads to the accumulation of unfolded proteins in the chloroplast (dark green) triggering the cpUPR. This causes nuclear genes which encode factors that assist in protein folding (such as chaperones and proteases) to become upregulated. In order to monitor changes to cpUPR signaling, a fluorescent protein was put under the control of one of these factors (VIPP2), so that fluorescence could only be observed when cpUPR was induced. By inserting random mutations into the genome and screening for mutants no longer displaying the fluorescent reporter, Perlaza et al. were able to identify MARS1, a kinase involved in transmitting the cpUPR signal from the chloroplast to the nucleus. MARS1: mutant affected in chloroplast-to-nucleus retrograde signaling 1.

Using this screen, the team – which includes researchers from UCSF, the Lawrence Berkeley Lab and Princeton – identified a gene coding for a protein called MARS1 that is essential for activating the cpUPR. Because MARS1 was localized outside of the chloroplast and contained a kinase domain (a critical component of cell signaling), Perlaza et al. deduced that MARS1 is likely to be involved in sending the cpUPR signal from the chloroplast to the nucleus. Furthermore, mutating the catalytic residue within the kinase domain revealed that kinase activity was critical for the cpUPR.

Stress caused by high levels of sunlight leads to an increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that damage proteins inside the chloroplast, which in turn triggers the cpUPR. Perlaza et al. found that mutating the kinase domain of MARS1 caused algae to be more susceptible to this type of chloroplast stress. Notably, the increased susceptibility of the mutants was only linked to chloroplast stressors that trigger the cpUPR, suggesting that MARS1 is specific for the unfolded protein response. Perlaza et al. also observed that mutant algae that had a dominantly active version of the kinase displayed enhanced resistance to high levels of light and ROS. This opens a potential avenue for how the cpUPR could be exploited to increase the efficiency of photosynthesis in other organisms.

The study of cpUPR is still in its infancy, but it is already revealing its importance in chloroplast development and the protection of photosynthetic activity. A crucial next step will be to apply this knowledge to higher plants, where MARS1 has not been identified but where responses equivalent to cpUPR have been shown to exist (Llamas et al., 2017). Any new components of the cpUPR pathway that researchers are able to identify could be potential new targets for increasing yields in crop species.

References

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Felix Kessler

    Felix Kessler is in the Laboratory of Plant Physiology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland

    For correspondence
    felix.kessler@unine.ch
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6409-5043
  2. Paolo Longoni

    Paolo Longoni is in the Laboratory of Plant Physiology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland

    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0587-7621

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published: October 15, 2019 (version 1)

Copyright

© 2019, Kessler and Longoni

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,718
    Page views
  • 186
    Downloads
  • 6
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Felix Kessler
  2. Paolo Longoni
(2019)
Protein Homeostasis: How chloroplasts protect themselves from unfolded proteins
eLife 8:e51430.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51430

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Jazlyn P Borges, Ragnhild SR Sætra ... Benjamin Ethan Steinberg
    Short Report

    First recognized more than 30 years ago, glycine protects cells against rupture from diverse types of injury. This robust and widely observed effect has been speculated to target a late downstream process common to multiple modes of tissue injury. The molecular target of glycine that mediates cytoprotection, however, remains elusive. Here, we show that glycine works at the level of NINJ1, a newly identified executioner of plasma membrane rupture in pyroptosis, necrosis, and post-apoptosis lysis. NINJ1 is thought to cluster within the plasma membrane to cause cell rupture. We demonstrate that the execution of pyroptotic cell rupture is similar for human and mouse NINJ1, and that NINJ1 knockout functionally and morphologically phenocopies glycine cytoprotection in macrophages undergoing lytic cell death. Next, we show that glycine prevents NINJ1 clustering by either direct or indirect mechanisms. In pyroptosis, glycine preserves cellular integrity but does not affect upstream inflammasome activities or accompanying energetic cell death. By positioning NINJ1 clustering as a glycine target, our data resolve a long-standing mechanism for glycine-mediated cytoprotection. This new understanding will inform the development of cell preservation strategies to counter pathologic lytic cell death.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Physics of Living Systems
    Nicola Bellotto, Jaime Agudo-Canalejo ... Victor Sourjik
    Research Article

    Inside prokaryotic cells, passive translational diffusion typically limits the rates with which cytoplasmic proteins can reach their locations. Diffusion is thus fundamental to most cellular processes, but the understanding of protein mobility in the highly crowded and non-homogeneous environment of a bacterial cell is still limited. Here we investigated the mobility of a large set of proteins in the cytoplasm of Escherichia coli, by employing fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) combined with simulations and theoretical modeling. We conclude that cytoplasmic protein mobility could be well described by Brownian diffusion in the confined geometry of the bacterial cell and at the high viscosity imposed by macromolecular crowding. We observed similar size dependence of protein diffusion for the majority of tested proteins, whether native or foreign to E. coli. For the faster-diffusing proteins, this size dependence is well consistent with the Stokes-Einstein relation once taking into account the specific dumbbell shape of protein fusions. Pronounced subdiffusion and hindered mobility are only observed for proteins with extensive interactions within the cytoplasm. Finally, while protein diffusion becomes markedly faster in actively growing cells, at high temperature, or upon treatment with rifampicin, and slower at high osmolarity, all of these perturbations affect proteins of different sizes in the same proportions, which could thus be described as changes of a well-defined cytoplasmic viscosity.