Prefrontal Cortex: A tale of two pathways
A combination of invasive and non-invasive techniques has allowed researchers to take a closer look at the two major neural pathways that connect the amygdala and the prefrontal cortex.
- University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States
- University of Rochester, United States
Ever since the ill-fated explosion in 1848 that sent a tamping iron through the prefrontal cortex of railroad worker Phineas Gage, inexplicably changing his personality, scientists have wanted to understand how the different regions of the brain are connected (Harlow, 1999; Van Horn et al., 2012). The task is immense because the computational power of the human brain lies not only in its billions of neurons, but also in the connections between them. Short-term memory, decision-making, mood regulation, and other complex behaviors that depend on the prefrontal cortex (PFC) are all based on multiple, long-range connections between neurons.
The connectivity between the prefrontal cortex and the amygdala is believed to be critical for the regulation of emotion, and has been implicated in anxiety and mood disorders in humans (Kim et al., 2016; Tromp et al., 2012; Johansen-Berg et al., 2008; Riva-Posse et al., 2014). Importantly, invasive experiments on monkeys have revealed that the PFC and the amygdala are connected by two pathways: the amygdalofugal pathway and the uncinate fasciculus (Nauta, 1961; Price et al., 1987; Lehman et al., 2011).
Connectivity in the brain occurs through axons: projections of neurons that can extend over great distances to transmit information to target cells. Local activity in receiving neurons influences whether and how this information is passed on through output channels to other regions. Different techniques can be used to visualize axons extending between cells in the brain. Tract tracing studies in monkeys rely on the use of genetic or molecular markers, known as tracers, to follow the path of an axon. However, in order to visualize the tracers using a microscope, the brain has to be sliced and mounted on slides, making this a highly invasive technique. A neuroimaging technique called diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), also known as ‘tractography’, is non-invasive and can be used on humans.
Tractography produces images of the brain based on axon tracts – bundles of axons that travel in the same direction. This technique uses the fact that water diffuses in different directions in the brain depending on the structures it surrounds. This makes it possible to estimate the direction of the diffusion of water molecules along axons. Tractography works best when axons are myelinated and form large smooth tracts on the way to their destination. However, many pathways in the brain twist and turn, subdividing into smaller bundles, regrouping, and crossing one another. This makes tractography studies technically difficult due to problems with false negative and false positive findings.
Now, in eLife, Davide Folloni and co-workers at the University of Oxford and Radboud University Nijmegen (Jérôme Sallet, Alexandre Khrapitchev, Nicola Sibson, Lennart Verhagen and Rogier Mars) report on a study that combines data from tract tracing studies and DTI to more accurately visualize the connectivity between the amygdala and the PFC in monkeys and humans (Folloni et al., 2019).
Both the amygdalofugal pathway and the uncinate fasciculus curve and turn extensively, co-mingling with axonal pathways connecting other brain regions. The amygdalofugal pathway is particularly tricky, as it pierces an area of the forebrain known as the substantia innominata (meaning unnamed substance). As it goes through this region, the pathway splits into smaller axon bundles. Some of these axons leave the pathway here, innervating the cells within this area of the brain, while others continue on to the PFC. In this part of its route, the amygdalofugal pathway is crisscrossed by axonal tracts from other brain regions, which make it difficult to obtain clear images of the pathway using tractography.
Using DTI data from rhesus monkeys, Folloni et al. employed a probabilistic tractography method to estimate the most likely orientation of the axons as they cover the long distance from the amygdala to the PFC. Using known features of both the amygdalofugal pathway and the uncinate fasciculus, obtained from invasive tract tracing studies on macaques, they developed new methods for examining prefrontal connectivity in monkeys and humans. These tools helped to limit the problem of capturing crosstalk from intervening fiber systems, and allowed Folloni et al. to follow the predicted route of both pathways. They used known tract tracing results from macaques to validate their DTI approach, and then applied the validated DTI technique in humans. The results showed that the separation of the two pathways is conserved between humans and macaques.
In both species, they find that the amygdalofugal and uncinate pathways converge as they enter the lower PFC, before terminating in different regions of the frontal pole. The connectivity of both pathways was distinct from nearby control pathways. Folloni et al. then compared the connectivity ‘fingerprints’ of the two pathways in both species (i.e. the brain regions most and least targeted by the pathways), finding overall similarities but also subtle differences.
The findings from Folloni et al. underscore the critical importance of using nonhuman primates in psychiatric research due to the close anatomic match of evolutionarily expanded brains. Moreover, there is a critical need to validate and constrain DTI methodology using a ‘ground truth’ method. This new study shows the way forward by demonstrating the value of combining invasive and noninvasive data in cross-species analyses.
These new results can be useful for devising accurate biomarkers for psychiatric diseases and to understand how brain ‘wiring’ and myelination unfold with age in health and disease. Clinically, these methods may help identify pathways associated with specific symptom clusters found in different disorders, and help to provide individualized diagnosis. For example, some forms of depression may involve the amygdalofugal pathway, while other depressive illnesses, with different symptoms, might not. Localizing aberrant brain connectivity within a specific network linked to precise symptom profiles may help plan for emerging treatments such as deep brain stimulation or transcranial magnetic stimulation.
References
-
Passage of an iron rod through the head. 1848The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 11:281–283.https://doi.org/10.1176/jnp.11.2.281
-
Fibre degeneration following lesions of the amygdaloid complex in the monkeyJournal of Anatomy 95:515–531.
-
BookThe limbic region. II. The amygdaloid complexIn: Björklund A, Hökfelt T, Swanson L. W, editors. Handbook of Chemical Neuroanatomy. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 279–381.
-
Reduced structural connectivity of a major frontolimbic pathway in generalized anxiety disorderArchives of General Psychiatry 69:925–934.https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.2178
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2019, Oler and Fudge
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 7,838
- views
-
- 264
- downloads
-
- 2
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Prefrontal Cortex: A tale of two pathways
eLife 8:e51990.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51990
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
Active inference integrates perception, decision-making, and learning into a united theoretical framework, providing an efficient way to trade off exploration and exploitation by minimizing (expected) free energy. In this study, we asked how the brain represents values and uncertainties (novelty and variability), and resolves these uncertainties under the active inference framework in the exploration-exploitation trade-off. Twenty-five participants performed a contextual two-armed bandit task, with electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings. By comparing the model evidence for active inference and reinforcement learning models of choice behavior, we show that active inference better explains human decision-making under novelty and variability, which entails exploration or information seeking. The EEG sensor-level results show that the activity in the frontal, central, and parietal regions is associated with novelty, while the activity in the frontal and central brain regions is associated with variability. The EEG source-level results indicate that the expected free energy is encoded in the frontal pole and middle frontal gyrus and uncertainties are encoded in different brain regions but with overlap. Our study dissociates the expected free energy and uncertainties in active inference theory and their neural correlates, speaking to the construct validity of active inference in characterizing cognitive processes of human decisions. It provides behavioral and neural evidence of active inference in decision processes and insights into the neural mechanism of human decisions under uncertainties.
-
- Genetics and Genomics
- Neuroscience
The mammalian suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), situated in the ventral hypothalamus, directs daily cellular and physiological rhythms across the body. The SCN clockwork is a self-sustaining transcriptional-translational feedback loop (TTFL) that in turn coordinates the expression of clock-controlled genes (CCGs) directing circadian programmes of SCN cellular activity. In the mouse, the transcription factor, ZFHX3 (zinc finger homeobox-3), is necessary for the development of the SCN and influences circadian behaviour in the adult. The molecular mechanisms by which ZFHX3 affects the SCN at transcriptomic and genomic levels are, however, poorly defined. Here, we used chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing to map the genomic localization of ZFHX3-binding sites in SCN chromatin. To test for function, we then conducted comprehensive RNA sequencing at six distinct times-of-day to compare the SCN transcriptional profiles of control and ZFHX3-conditional null mutants. We show that the genome-wide occupancy of ZFHX3 occurs predominantly around gene transcription start sites, co-localizing with known histone modifications, and preferentially partnering with clock transcription factors (CLOCK, BMAL1) to regulate clock gene(s) transcription. Correspondingly, we show that the conditional loss of ZFHX3 in the adult has a dramatic effect on the SCN transcriptome, including changes in the levels of transcripts encoding elements of numerous neuropeptide neurotransmitter systems while attenuating the daily oscillation of the clock TF Bmal1. Furthermore, various TTFL genes and CCGs exhibited altered circadian expression profiles, consistent with an advanced in daily behavioural rhythms under 12 h light–12 h dark conditions. Together, these findings reveal the extensive genome-wide regulation mediated by ZFHX3 in the central clock that orchestrates daily timekeeping in mammals.
