1. Computational and Systems Biology
  2. Immunology and Inflammation
Download icon

Identifying the immune interactions underlying HLA class I disease associations

  1. Bisrat J Debebe
  2. Lies Boelen
  3. James C Lee
  4. IAVI Protocol C Investigators
  5. Chloe L Thio
  6. Jacquie Astemborski
  7. Gregory Kirk
  8. Salim I Khakoo
  9. Sharyne M Donfield
  10. James J Goedert
  11. Becca Asquith  Is a corresponding author
  1. Imperial College London, United Kingdom
  2. University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
  3. Johns Hopkins University, United States
  4. Johns Hopkins, United States
  5. University of Southampton, United Kingdom
  6. Rho, United States
  7. NCI, United States
Research Article
  • Cited 2
  • Views 2,017
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2020;9:e54558 doi: 10.7554/eLife.54558

Abstract

Variation in the risk and severity of many autoimmune diseases, malignancies and infections is strongly associated with polymorphisms in the HLA class I loci. These genetic associations provide a powerful opportunity for understanding the etiology of human disease. HLA class I associations are often interpreted in the light of 'protective' or 'detrimental' CD8+ T cell responses which are restricted by the host HLA class I allotype. However, given the diverse receptors which are bound by HLA class I molecules, alternative interpretations are possible. As well as binding T cell receptors on CD8+ T cells, HLA class I molecules are important ligands for inhibitory and activating killer immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs) which are found on natural killer cells and some T cells; for the CD94:NKG2 family of receptors also expressed mainly by NK cells and for leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptors (LILRs) on myeloid cells. The aim of this study is to develop an immunogenetic approach for identifying and quantifying the relative contribution of different receptor-ligand interactions to a given HLA class I disease association and then to use this approach to investigate the immune interactions underlying HLA class I disease associations in three viral infections: Human T cell Leukemia Virus type 1, Human Immunodeficiency Virus type 1 and Hepatitis C Virus as well as in the inflammatory condition Crohn's disease.

Data availability

Upon acceptance we will upload, to a public database, all the data analysis ie the data underlying Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Supplementary Figure S1, Supplementary Figure S2, Supplementary Figure S3 and Supplementary Figure S4. We are unable to provide the raw patient data as this has been released to us under MTAs and uploading of data would violate the terms of these MTAs.The PIs we contacted for the various cohorts are: Pat Fast, IAVI, New York (IAVI); Charles Bangham, Imperial College London, UK (Kagoshima cohort); Greg Kirk, Johns Hopkins, USA (ALIVE cohort); James Goedert, NIH (MHCS cohort); Sharyne Donfield, Rho, USA (HGDS cohort); Salim Khakoo, University of Southampton, UK (UK HCV cohort) and James Lee, University of Cambridge, UK (Crohn's disease cohort). Requests for data access and usage are reviewed by the relevant boards at each institution.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Bisrat J Debebe

    Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  2. Lies Boelen

    Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  3. James C Lee

    Gastroenterology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  4. IAVI Protocol C Investigators

  5. Chloe L Thio

    Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  6. Jacquie Astemborski

    Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  7. Gregory Kirk

    Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  8. Salim I Khakoo

    Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  9. Sharyne M Donfield

    Rho, Chapel Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  10. James J Goedert

    Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, NCI, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  11. Becca Asquith

    Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    b.asquith@imperial.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5911-3160

Funding

Wellcome (103865Z/14/Z)

  • Becca Asquith

National Institutes of Health (R01-DA-12568)

  • Gregory Kirk

National Institutes of Health (K24-AI118591)

  • Gregory Kirk

Medical Research Council (J007439)

  • Becca Asquith

Medical Research Council (G1001052)

  • Becca Asquith

European Commission (317040)

  • Becca Asquith

Bloodwise (15012)

  • Becca Asquith

Wellcome (105920/Z/14/Z)

  • James C Lee

National Institutes of Health (DA13324)

  • Chloe L Thio

National Institutes of Health (R01-HD-41224)

  • Sharyne M Donfield

National Institutes of Health (U01-DA-036297)

  • Gregory Kirk

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: This study was approved by the NHS Research Ethics Committee (13/WS/0064) and the Imperial College Research Ethics Committee (ICREC_11_1_2). Informed consent was obtained at the study sites from all individuals. The study was conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Miles P Davenport, University of New South Wales, Australia

Publication history

  1. Received: December 18, 2019
  2. Accepted: March 6, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: April 2, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: May 27, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 2,017
    Page views
  • 311
    Downloads
  • 2
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: PubMed Central, Crossref, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Immunology and Inflammation

    Immunogenetics: Untangling the immune basis of disease susceptibility

    Ruy M Ribeiro, Luis Graca
    Insight

    Interactions between immune cell receptors and proteins that determine disease susceptibility shed light on how different arms of the immune system are involved in three viral infections and Crohn's disease.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience

    Low-dimensional learned feature spaces quantify individual and group differences in vocal repertoires

    Jack Goffinet et al.
    Research Article Updated

    Increases in the scale and complexity of behavioral data pose an increasing challenge for data analysis. A common strategy involves replacing entire behaviors with small numbers of handpicked, domain-specific features, but this approach suffers from several crucial limitations. For example, handpicked features may miss important dimensions of variability, and correlations among them complicate statistical testing. Here, by contrast, we apply the variational autoencoder (VAE), an unsupervised learning method, to learn features directly from data and quantify the vocal behavior of two model species: the laboratory mouse and the zebra finch. The VAE converges on a parsimonious representation that outperforms handpicked features on a variety of common analysis tasks, enables the measurement of moment-by-moment vocal variability on the timescale of tens of milliseconds in the zebra finch, provides strong evidence that mouse ultrasonic vocalizations do not cluster as is commonly believed, and captures the similarity of tutor and pupil birdsong with qualitatively higher fidelity than previous approaches. In all, we demonstrate the utility of modern unsupervised learning approaches to the quantification of complex and high-dimensional vocal behavior.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Evolutionary Biology

    An evolutionary model identifies the main evolutionary biases for the evolution of genome-replication profiles

    Rossana Droghetti et al.
    Research Article Updated

    Recent results comparing the temporal program of genome replication of yeast species belonging to the Lachancea clade support the scenario that the evolution of the replication timing program could be mainly driven by correlated acquisition and loss events of active replication origins. Using these results as a benchmark, we develop an evolutionary model defined as birth-death process for replication origins and use it to identify the evolutionary biases that shape the replication timing profiles. Comparing different evolutionary models with data, we find that replication origin birth and death events are mainly driven by two evolutionary pressures, the first imposes that events leading to higher double-stall probability of replication forks are penalized, while the second makes less efficient origins more prone to evolutionary loss. This analysis provides an empirically grounded predictive framework for quantitative evolutionary studies of the replication timing program.