A community-maintained standard library of population genetic models
- University of Oregon, United States
- University of Oxford, United Kingdom
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, United States
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States
- University of Copenhagen, Denmark
- University of California, Los Angeles, United States
- McGill University, Canada
- University of Melbourne, Australia
- University of Freiburg, Germany
- University of Washington, United States
- Arizona State University, United States
- IDC Herzliya, Israel
- Stanford University, United States
- Columbia University, United States
- Cornell University, United States
- ITMO University, Russian Federation
- National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico
- University of Arizona, United States
Abstract
The explosion in population genomic data demands ever more complex modes of analysis, and increasingly these analyses depend on sophisticated simulations. Re-cent advances in population genetic simulation have made it possible to simulate large and complex models, but specifying such models for a particular simulation engine remains a difficult and error-prone task. Computational genetics researchers currently re-implement simulation models independently, leading to inconsistency and duplication of effort. This situation presents a major barrier to empirical researchers seeking to use simulations for power analyses of upcoming studies or sanity checks on existing genomic data. Population genetics, as a field, also lacks standard benchmarks by which new tools for inference might be measured. Here we describe a new resource, stdpopsim, that attempts to rectify this situation. Stdpopsim is a community-driven open source project, which provides easy access to a growing catalog of published simulation models from a range of organisms and supports multiple simulation engine backends. This resource is available as a well-documented python library with a simple command-line interface. We share some examples demonstrating how stdpopsim can be used to systematically compare demographic inference methods, and we encourage a broader community of developers to contribute to this growing resource.
Data availability
All resources are available from https://github.com/popsim-consortium/stdpopsim
Article and author information
Author details
Christopher B Cole
Funding
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM119856)
- Christopher C Kyriazis
- Kirk E Lohmueller
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM117241)
- Jeffrey R Adrion
- Andrew D Kern
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM127348)
- Travis J Struck
- Ryan N Gutenkunst
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R00HG008696)
- Ariella L Gladstein
- Daniel R Schrider
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM127070)
- Noah Dukler
- Adam Siepel
National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG010346)
- Noah Dukler
- Adam Siepel
Villum Fonden (00025300)
- Graham Gower
- Fernando Racimo
UC MEXUS-CONACYT
- Diego Ortega Del Vecchyo
Robertson Foundation
- Jerome Kelleher
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Reviewing Editor
- Graham Coop, University of California, Davis, United States
Publication history
- Received: January 7, 2020
- Accepted: June 15, 2020
- Accepted Manuscript published: June 23, 2020 (version 1)
- Accepted Manuscript updated: June 25, 2020 (version 2)
- Version of Record published: August 19, 2020 (version 3)
Copyright
© 2020, Adrion et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 5,228
- Page views
-
- 562
- Downloads
-
- 41
- Citations
Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, Scopus, PubMed Central.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
A community-maintained standard library of population genetic models
eLife 9:e54967.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54967
Further reading
-
- Cancer Biology
- Computational and Systems Biology
Lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) is a type of lung cancer with a dismal prognosis that lacks adequate therapies and actionable targets. This disease is characterized by a sequence of low- and high-grade preinvasive stages with increasing probability of malignant progression. Increasing our knowledge about the biology of these premalignant lesions (PMLs) is necessary to design new methods of early detection and prevention, and to identify the molecular processes that are key for malignant progression. To facilitate this research, we have designed XTABLE (Exploring Transcriptomes of Bronchial Lesions), an open-source application that integrates the most extensive transcriptomic databases of PMLs published so far. With this tool, users can stratify samples using multiple parameters and interrogate PML biology in multiple manners, such as two- and multiple-group comparisons, interrogation of genes of interests, and transcriptional signatures. Using XTABLE, we have carried out a comparative study of the potential role of chromosomal instability scores as biomarkers of PML progression and mapped the onset of the most relevant LUSC pathways to the sequence of LUSC developmental stages. XTABLE will critically facilitate new research for the identification of early detection biomarkers and acquire a better understanding of the LUSC precancerous stages.
-
- Computational and Systems Biology
- Neuroscience
Humans make a number of choices when they walk, such as how fast and for how long. The preferred steady walking speed seems chosen to minimize energy expenditure per distance traveled. But the speed of actual walking bouts is not only steady, but rather a time-varying trajectory, which can also be modulated by task urgency or an individual’s movement vigor. Here we show that speed trajectories and durations of human walking bouts are explained better by an objective to minimize Energy and Time, meaning the total work or energy to reach destination, plus a cost proportional to bout duration. Applied to a computational model of walking dynamics, this objective predicts dynamic speed vs. time trajectories with inverted U shapes. Model and human experiment (N=10) show that shorter bouts are unsteady and dominated by the time and effort of accelerating, and longer ones are steadier and faster and dominated by steady-state time and effort. Individual-dependent vigor may be characterized by the energy one is willing to spend to save a unit of time, which explains why some may walk faster than others, but everyone may have similar-shaped trajectories due to similar walking dynamics. Tradeoffs between energy and time costs can predict transient, steady, and vigor-related aspects of walking.
