Performance of a deep learning based neural network in the selection of human blastocysts for implantation

  1. Charles L Bormann
  2. Manoj Kumar Kanakasabapathy
  3. Prudhvi Thirumalaraju
  4. Raghav Gupta
  5. Rohan Pooniwala
  6. Hemanth Kandula
  7. Eduardo Hariton
  8. Irene Souter
  9. Irene Dimitriadis
  10. Leslie B Ramirez
  11. Carol L Curchoe
  12. Jason E Swain
  13. Lynn M Boehnlein
  14. Hadi Shafiee  Is a corresponding author
  1. Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, United States
  2. Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, United States
  3. Extend Fertility, United States
  4. San Diego Fertility Center, United States
  5. Colorado Center for Reproductive Medicine IVF Laboratory Network, United States
  6. University of Wisconsin, United States

Abstract

Deep learning in in-vitro fertilization is currently being evaluated in the development of assistive tools for the determination of transfer order and implantation potential using time-lapse data collected through expensive imaging hardware. Assistive tools and algorithms that can work with static images, however, can help in improving the access to care by enabling their use with images acquired from traditional microscopes that are available to virtually all fertility centers. Here, we evaluated the use of a deep convolutional neural network (CNN), trained using single timepoint images of embryos collected at 113 hours post-insemination, in embryo selection amongst 97 clinical patient cohorts (742 embryos) and observed an accuracy of 90% in choosing the highest quality embryo available. Furthermore, a CNN trained to assess an embryo’s implantation potential directly using a set of 97 euploid embryos capable of implantation outperformed 15 trained embryologists (75.26% vs. 67.35%, P<0.0001) from 5 different fertility centers.

Data availability

Patients did not explicitly consent to their data being made public and access is therefore restricted. Requests for the anonymized data should be made to Charles Bormann (cbormann@partners.org) and Hadi Shafiee (hshafiee@bwh.harvard.edu). Requests will be reviewed by a data access committee, taking into account the research proposal and intended use of the data. Requestors are required to sign a data-sharing agreement to ensure patients' confidentiality is maintained prior to the release of any data.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Charles L Bormann

    Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    Charles L Bormann, Charles L Bormann, Ph.D has a patent WO2019068073A1 pending..
  2. Manoj Kumar Kanakasabapathy

    Division of Engineering in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    Manoj Kumar Kanakasabapathy, ManojKumar Kanakasabapathy has a patent WO2019068073A1 pending..
  3. Prudhvi Thirumalaraju

    Division of Engineering in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    Prudhvi Thirumalaraju, Prudhvi Thirumalaraju has a patent WO2019068073A1 pending..
  4. Raghav Gupta

    Division of Engineering in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Rohan Pooniwala

    Division of Engineering in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Hemanth Kandula

    Division of Engineering in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Eduardo Hariton

    Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Irene Souter

    Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Irene Dimitriadis

    Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Leslie B Ramirez

    Embryology, Extend Fertility, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Carol L Curchoe

    Embryology, San Diego Fertility Center, San Diego, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Jason E Swain

    Colorado Center for Reproductive Medicine IVF Laboratory Network, Englewood, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Lynn M Boehnlein

    Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Hadi Shafiee

    Division of Engineering in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, United States
    For correspondence
    HSHAFIEE@BWH.HARVARD.EDU
    Competing interests
    Hadi Shafiee, Dr. Shafiee has a patent WO2019068073A1 pending..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2240-7648

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01AI138800)

  • Hadi Shafiee

Brigham and Women's Hospital (Precision Medicine Program)

  • Hadi Shafiee

Partners Healthcare (Innovation Discovery Grant)

  • Charles L Bormann

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: Embryo image/video data collected from patients were used in this study with an institutional review board approval (IRB#2017P001339) We used 3,469 recorded videos of embryos collected from patients with informed consent for research and publication, under an institutional review board approval for secondary research use.

Copyright

© 2020, Bormann et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,003
    views
  • 835
    downloads
  • 91
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Charles L Bormann
  2. Manoj Kumar Kanakasabapathy
  3. Prudhvi Thirumalaraju
  4. Raghav Gupta
  5. Rohan Pooniwala
  6. Hemanth Kandula
  7. Eduardo Hariton
  8. Irene Souter
  9. Irene Dimitriadis
  10. Leslie B Ramirez
  11. Carol L Curchoe
  12. Jason E Swain
  13. Lynn M Boehnlein
  14. Hadi Shafiee
(2020)
Performance of a deep learning based neural network in the selection of human blastocysts for implantation
eLife 9:e55301.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55301

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55301

Further reading

    1. Medicine
    Jeong-Oh Shin, Jong-Bin Lee ... Jin-Woo Kim
    Research Article

    This study investigates the effects of two parathyroid hormone (PTH) analogs, rhPTH(1-34) and dimeric R25CPTH(1-34), on bone regeneration and osseointegration in a postmenopausal osteoporosis model using beagle dogs. Twelve osteoporotic female beagles were subjected to implant surgeries and assigned to one of three groups: control, rhPTH(1-34), or dimeric R25CPTH(1-34). Bone regeneration and osseointegration were evaluated after 10 weeks using micro-computed tomographic (micro-CT), histological analyses, and serum biochemical assays. Results showed that the rhPTH(1-34) group demonstrated superior improvements in bone mineral density, trabecular architecture, and osseointegration compared to controls, while the dimeric R25CPTH(1-34) group exhibited similar, though slightly less pronounced, anabolic effects. Histological and TRAP assays indicated both PTH analogs significantly enhanced bone regeneration, especially in artificially created bone defects. The findings suggest that both rhPTH(1-34) and dimeric R25CPTH(1-34) hold potential as therapeutic agents for promoting bone regeneration and improving osseointegration around implants in osteoporotic conditions, with implications for their use in bone-related pathologies and reconstructive surgeries.

    1. Medicine
    2. Neuroscience
    Sophie Leclercq, Hany Ahmed ... Nathalie Delzenne
    Research Article

    Background:

    Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is a global health problem with limited therapeutic options. The biochemical mechanisms that lead to this disorder are not yet fully understood, and in this respect, metabolomics represents a promising approach to decipher metabolic events related to AUD. The plasma metabolome contains a plethora of bioactive molecules that reflects the functional changes in host metabolism but also the impact of the gut microbiome and nutritional habits.

    Methods:

    In this study, we investigated the impact of severe AUD (sAUD), and of a 3-week period of alcohol abstinence, on the blood metabolome (non-targeted LC-MS metabolomics analysis) in 96 sAUD patients hospitalized for alcohol withdrawal.

    Results:

    We found that the plasma levels of different lipids ((lyso)phosphatidylcholines, long-chain fatty acids), short-chain fatty acids (i.e. 3-hydroxyvaleric acid) and bile acids were altered in sAUD patients. In addition, several microbial metabolites, including indole-3-propionic acid, p-cresol sulfate, hippuric acid, pyrocatechol sulfate, and metabolites belonging to xanthine class (paraxanthine, theobromine and theophylline) were sensitive to alcohol exposure and alcohol withdrawal. 3-Hydroxyvaleric acid, caffeine metabolites (theobromine, paraxanthine, and theophylline) and microbial metabolites (hippuric acid and pyrocatechol sulfate) were correlated with anxiety, depression and alcohol craving. Metabolomics analysis in postmortem samples of frontal cortex and cerebrospinal fluid of those consuming a high level of alcohol revealed that those metabolites can be found also in brain tissue.

    Conclusions:

    Our data allow the identification of neuroactive metabolites, from interactions between food components and microbiota, which may represent new targets arising in the management of neuropsychiatric diseases such as sAUD.

    Funding:

    Gut2Behave project was initiated from ERA-NET NEURON network (Joint Transnational Call 2019) and was financed by Academy of Finland, French National Research Agency (ANR-19-NEUR-0003-03) and the Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique (FRS-FNRS; PINT-MULTI R.8013.19, Belgium). Metabolomics analysis of the TSDS samples was supported by grant from the Finnish Foundation for Alcohol Studies.