Abstract

The transport of charged molecules across biological membranes faces the dual problem of accommodating charges in a highly hydrophobic environment while maintaining selective substrate translocation. This has been the subject of a particular controversy for the exchange of ammonium across cellular membranes, an essential process in all domains of life. Ammonium transport is mediated by the ubiquitous Amt/Mep/Rh transporters that includes the human Rhesus factors. Here, using a combination of electrophysiology, yeast functional complementation and extended molecular dynamics simulations, we reveal a unique two-lane pathway for electrogenic NH4+ transport in two archetypal members of the family, the transporters AmtB from Escherichia coli and Rh50 from Nitrosomonas europaea. The pathway underpins a mechanism by which charged H+ and neutral NH3 are carried separately across the membrane after NH4+ deprotonation. This mechanism defines a new principle of achieving transport selectivity against competing ions in a biological transport process.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for Figures 1-5 and Table 2.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Gordon Williamson

    Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Giulia Tamburrino

    School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Adriana Bizior

    Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Mélanie Boeckstaens

    Department of Molecular Biology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Gosselies, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1629-7403
  5. Gaëtan Dias Mirandela

    Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5871-6288
  6. Marcus Bage

    School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Andrei Pisliakov

    School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Callum M Ives

    School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0511-1220
  9. Eilidh Terras

    Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Paul A Hoskisson

    Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Anna-Maria Marini

    Department of Molecular Biology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Gosselies, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Ulrich Zachariae

    School of Life Sciences / School of Science and Engineering, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    u.zachariae@dundee.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Arnaud Javelle

    Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    arnaud.javelle@strath.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3611-5737

Funding

Tenovus (S17-07)

  • Arnaud Javelle

Scottish Universities Physics Alliance (NA)

  • Ulrich Zachariae

Natural Environment Research Council (NE/M001415/1)

  • Paul A Hoskisson

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Nir Ben-Tal, Tel Aviv University, Israel

Version history

  1. Received: March 24, 2020
  2. Accepted: July 13, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: July 14, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: August 25, 2020 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record updated: January 27, 2022 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2020, Williamson et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,849
    views
  • 372
    downloads
  • 23
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Gordon Williamson
  2. Giulia Tamburrino
  3. Adriana Bizior
  4. Mélanie Boeckstaens
  5. Gaëtan Dias Mirandela
  6. Marcus Bage
  7. Andrei Pisliakov
  8. Callum M Ives
  9. Eilidh Terras
  10. Paul A Hoskisson
  11. Anna-Maria Marini
  12. Ulrich Zachariae
  13. Arnaud Javelle
(2020)
A two-lane mechanism for selective biological ammonium transport
eLife 9:e57183.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.57183

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.57183

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Plant Biology
    Henning Mühlenbeck, Yuko Tsutsui ... Cyril Zipfel
    Research Article

    Transmembrane signaling by plant receptor kinases (RKs) has long been thought to involve reciprocal trans-phosphorylation of their intracellular kinase domains. The fact that many of these are pseudokinase domains, however, suggests that additional mechanisms must govern RK signaling activation. Non-catalytic signaling mechanisms of protein kinase domains have been described in metazoans, but information is scarce for plants. Recently, a non-catalytic function was reported for the leucine-rich repeat (LRR)-RK subfamily XIIa member EFR (elongation factor Tu receptor) and phosphorylation-dependent conformational changes were proposed to regulate signaling of RKs with non-RD kinase domains. Here, using EFR as a model, we describe a non-catalytic activation mechanism for LRR-RKs with non-RD kinase domains. EFR is an active kinase, but a kinase-dead variant retains the ability to enhance catalytic activity of its co-receptor kinase BAK1/SERK3 (brassinosteroid insensitive 1-associated kinase 1/somatic embryogenesis receptor kinase 3). Applying hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) analysis and designing homology-based intragenic suppressor mutations, we provide evidence that the EFR kinase domain must adopt its active conformation in order to activate BAK1 allosterically, likely by supporting αC-helix positioning in BAK1. Our results suggest a conformational toggle model for signaling, in which BAK1 first phosphorylates EFR in the activation loop to stabilize its active conformation, allowing EFR in turn to allosterically activate BAK1.