Aging and Geroscience: Putting epigenetic biomarkers to the test for clinical trials

Reliable biomarkers are needed to test the effectiveness of interventions intended to improve health and extend lifespan.
  1. Jamie N Justice  Is a corresponding author
  2. Stephen B Kritchevsky
  1. Internal Medicine Section on Gerontology and Geriatrics, Wake Forest School of Medicine, United States
  2. Sticht Center for Healthy Aging and Alzheimer’s Prevention, Wake Forest School of Medicine, United States

Geroscience is a developing discipline based on the premise that health can be improved by targeting aging. This hypothesis is supported by evidence that interventions (such as changes in diet) can improve the health and extend the lifespan of various animal models (López-Otín et al., 2013). Clinical trials are underway to test the geroscience hypothesis in humans (Barzilai et al., 2016). Definitive tests of the hypothesis must demonstrate reduced rates of age-related diseases and death, but the length of time and size of trial needed to test the hypothesis are both substantial. Therefore, objective, quantifiable characteristics of the aging process – known as biomarkers – that can be tracked in clinical trials are needed for the field to progress.

Useful biomarkers should meet several criteria: i) their measurement should be reliable and feasible; ii) they should be relevant to aging; iii) they should robustly and consistently predict trial endpoints, such as functional ability, disease, or death; and iv) they should be responsive to interventions such as treatments targeting aging biology (Justice et al., 2018). Practically speaking, this means that a change in the level of a biomarker should parallel changes in the susceptibility to disease, age of death, or loss of function. Interventions that target aging and support the geroscience hypothesis should therefore also lead to changes in these biomarkers, which will be reflected in the incidence or severity of age-related diseases and functional decline.

Biomarkers based on DNA methylation levels look promising. Briefly, these biomarkers quantify the proportion of cells in which a gene locus is methylated. Small but consistent changes in the methylation of some loci occur in organisms with older ages, and early methods for estimating age using epigenetics took advantage of these chronologic changes (Hannum et al., 2013; Horvath, 2013). However, critics argue that while these ‘clocks’ may be associated with chronological age, it is uncertain whether they reflect meaningful change in the context of interventions affecting the underlying biology.

Estimators based on the levels of DNA methylation are now being developed to detect a myriad of disease states and predict mortality and adverse health events, and each is unique to its calibration method. A few of these estimators are calibrated to detect aging-related outcomes, which makes them attractive as possible biomarkers for clinical trials in geroscience. Now, in eLife, Daniel Belsky (Columbia University) and colleagues in the United States, the United Kingdom, Denmark and New Zealand report the development of a new epigenetic biomarker called Dunedin Pace of Aging methylation (DunedinPoAm) that is able to detect how aging phenotypes change over time (Belsky et al., 2020).

The new biomarker relies on a composite measure called the Pace of Aging that was developed by Belsky and colleagues several years ago (Belsky et al., 2015). The Pace of Aging is calculated based on a number of age-related phenotypic changes that occur over time. In the new work this measure was used to calibrate and validate a DNA-wide methylation clock in four independent cohorts. This is in contrast to previous approaches in which methylation biomarkers were calibrated using endpoints such as chronological age, death, environmental exposure or other biomarkers.

Is DunedinPoAm developed to the point where it could be relied upon as a biomarker for clinical trials targeting biological aging? Figure 1 shows four criteria that are used to evaluate DNA methylation as a biomarker. DunedinPoAm appears to satisfy the first three criteria. It remains to be seen if it can satisfy the fourth, which involves being responsive to interventions. One of the cohorts used to validate the new approach consisted of middle-aged, non-obese adults enrolled in the CALERIE trial. This trial tested the effects of caloric restriction – an intervention that has been successful in animal models – over a period of two years. DunedinPoAm was able to predict changes in the Pace of Aging measure in the control group, but not in the group that had been calorie restricted. However, it remains to be seen whether interventions which affect aging biology change DunedinPoAm in a way that is consistent with the phenotypic changes observed in the trial.

Assessing DNA methylation biomarkers for use in clinical trials in geroscience.

How do five DNA methylation-based biomarkers (listed in row 1) fare when assessed against four biomarker criteria for clinical trials targeting aging (listed in column 1)? All five biomarkers meet the first three criteria, but none as yet satisfy the fourth criterion. Row 2 lists how each biomarker was calibrated. Horvath and Hannum are both epigenetic age estimators (Horvath, 2013; Hannum et al., 2013); GrimAge is a mortality estimator (Lu et al., 2019); PhenoAge is a health and lifespan biomarker (Levine et al., 2018); and DunedinPoAm is an estimator of change in aging phenotype over time (Belsky et al., 2020).

Testing the geroscience hypothesis in clinical trials is still in its early days, so it is not surprising that DunedinPoAm does not yet meet the primary criterion for an aging biomarker. However, emerging evidence suggests that methylation state may change with intervention. Data from two small clinical studies, with fewer than 15 people in the control and intervention groups, suggest that methylation-based biomarkers just might meet the minimum burden of proof (Chen et al., 2019; Fahy et al., 2019). However, the acid test for any biomarker will be whether changes in its levels predict differences in the rate of chronic disease accumulation or progression, death or other clinical trial endpoints. This will require a large study like the planned Targeted Aging with MEtformin (TAME) trial, which will last for over four years and include 3000 test subjects. This trial will test the effects of metformin, a drug currently used to treat type 2 diabetes, on FDA-informed clinical disease endpoints and functional ability. Trials like this will provide a platform for discovery, data sharing, and widescale biomarker validation to accelerate the pace of progress in geroscience.

References

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jamie N Justice

    Jamie N Justice is in the Internal Medicine Section on Gerontology and Geriatrics and the Sticht Center for Healthy Aging and Alzheimer’s Prevention, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, United States

    For correspondence
    jnjustic@wakehealth.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2953-4404
  2. Stephen B Kritchevsky

    Stephen B Kritchevsky is in the Internal Medicine Section on Gerontology and Geriatrics and the Sticht Center for Healthy Aging and Alzheimer’s Prevention, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, United States

    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3336-6781

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published: June 9, 2020 (version 1)

Copyright

© 2020, Justice and Kritchevsky

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,146
    views
  • 222
    downloads
  • 20
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jamie N Justice
  2. Stephen B Kritchevsky
(2020)
Aging and Geroscience: Putting epigenetic biomarkers to the test for clinical trials
eLife 9:e58592.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58592

Further reading

    1. Epidemiology and Global Health
    Xiaoxin Yu, Roger S Zoh ... David B Allison
    Review Article

    We discuss 12 misperceptions, misstatements, or mistakes concerning the use of covariates in observational or nonrandomized research. Additionally, we offer advice to help investigators, editors, reviewers, and readers make more informed decisions about conducting and interpreting research where the influence of covariates may be at issue. We primarily address misperceptions in the context of statistical management of the covariates through various forms of modeling, although we also emphasize design and model or variable selection. Other approaches to addressing the effects of covariates, including matching, have logical extensions from what we discuss here but are not dwelled upon heavily. The misperceptions, misstatements, or mistakes we discuss include accurate representation of covariates, effects of measurement error, overreliance on covariate categorization, underestimation of power loss when controlling for covariates, misinterpretation of significance in statistical models, and misconceptions about confounding variables, selecting on a collider, and p value interpretations in covariate-inclusive analyses. This condensed overview serves to correct common errors and improve research quality in general and in nutrition research specifically.

    1. Ecology
    2. Epidemiology and Global Health
    Emilia Johnson, Reuben Sunil Kumar Sharma ... Kimberly Fornace
    Research Article

    Zoonotic disease dynamics in wildlife hosts are rarely quantified at macroecological scales due to the lack of systematic surveys. Non-human primates (NHPs) host Plasmodium knowlesi, a zoonotic malaria of public health concern and the main barrier to malaria elimination in Southeast Asia. Understanding of regional P. knowlesi infection dynamics in wildlife is limited. Here, we systematically assemble reports of NHP P. knowlesi and investigate geographic determinants of prevalence in reservoir species. Meta-analysis of 6322 NHPs from 148 sites reveals that prevalence is heterogeneous across Southeast Asia, with low overall prevalence and high estimates for Malaysian Borneo. We find that regions exhibiting higher prevalence in NHPs overlap with human infection hotspots. In wildlife and humans, parasite transmission is linked to land conversion and fragmentation. By assembling remote sensing data and fitting statistical models to prevalence at multiple spatial scales, we identify novel relationships between P. knowlesi in NHPs and forest fragmentation. This suggests that higher prevalence may be contingent on habitat complexity, which would begin to explain observed geographic variation in parasite burden. These findings address critical gaps in understanding regional P. knowlesi epidemiology and indicate that prevalence in simian reservoirs may be a key spatial driver of human spillover risk.