Do wealth and inequality associate with health in a small-scale subsistence society?
Abstract
In high-income countries, one's relative socio-economic position and economic inequality may affect health and well-being, arguably via psychosocial stress. We tested this in a small-scale subsistence society, the Tsimane, by associating relative household wealth (n=871) and community-level wealth inequality (n=40, Gini = 0.15 – 0.53) with a range of psychological variables, stressors, and health outcomes (depressive symptoms [n=670], social conflicts [n=401], non-social problems [n=398], social support [n=399], cortisol [n=811], BMI [n=9926], blood pressure [n=3195], self-rated health [n=2523], morbidities [n=1542]) controlling for community-average wealth, age, sex, household size, community size, and distance to markets. Wealthier people largely had better outcomes while inequality associated with more respiratory disease, a leading cause of mortality. Greater inequality and lower wealth were associated with higher blood pressure. Psychosocial factors didn't mediate wealth-health associations. Thus, relative socio-economic position and inequality may affect health across diverse societies, though this is likely exacerbated in high-income countries.
Data availability
All data and R code are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4567498 with any updates at https://github.com/adblackwell/wealthinequality
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (PBZHP3-133443)
- Adrian V Jaeggi
National Science Foundation (BCS0136274)
- Hillard Kaplan
National Science Foundation (BCS0422690)
- Michael D Gurven
National Institutes of Health (R01AG024119)
- Hillard Kaplan
- Michael D Gurven
National Institutes of Health (RF1AG054442)
- Hillard Kaplan
- Michael D Gurven
National Institutes of Health (R56AG024119)
- Hillard Kaplan
- Michael D Gurven
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Ethics
Human subjects: Institutional Review Board approval was granted by UNM (HRRC # 07-157) and UCSB (# 3-16- 0766), as was informed consent at three levels: (1) Tsimane government that oversees research projects, (2) village leaders and community meetings, and (3) study participants.
Copyright
© 2021, Jaeggi et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 4,352
- views
-
- 373
- downloads
-
- 37
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Citations by DOI
-
- 37
- citations for umbrella DOI https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.59437