Health: Going beyond lifestyle factors
The idea of a ‘social ladder’ may be metaphorical, but actual and perceived societal ranking have real consequences for the health of an individual (Adler et al., 2000). How social structure influences health and disease is overwhelmingly studied in high-income countries, where coronary heart disease (CHD for short) is the leading cause of death (Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, 2019).
In these societies, the relationship between an individual’s social position and their CHD risk is astonishingly consistent, with disadvantaged populations being more likely to suffer from the disease and to die from it (Schultz et al., 2018). Despite the clarity of this evidence, the public health workforce has not yet reached a unified consensus on why these inequalities occur, and what can be done to reduce them (Marmot, 2004).
Lifestyle factors such as diet, sedentarism or smoking, and their ensuing effects like hypertension, only partially account for the excess burden of CHD in disadvantaged groups (Schultz et al., 2018). Yet primary prevention efforts appear to focus on these health behaviours over other factors linked to social inequality. In fact, targeting lifestyle alone is likely to exacerbate inequalities in post-industrial societies (Marmot, 2004).
Investigating inequalities in populations that have not adopted Western diets and activity levels – a challenging undertaking given the proliferation of this lifestyle worldwide – could be a way to confront the underlying assumption that behavioural differences are responsible for the observed inequality in CHD (Kopp, 2019). Now, in eLife, Adrian Jaeggi (University of Zurich and Emory University), Aaron Blackwell (Washington State University) and co-workers based in the United States, France and Germany report the most comprehensive study on social structure and health in a pre-industrial society in the Bolivian Amazon known as the Tsimane (Jaeggi et al., 2021).
This population relies on subsistence farming supplemented by hunter-gatherer practices, resulting in an extremely physically active life and a diet that is rich in fibres and micronutrients. In turn, they have remarkably modest rates of obesity and hypertension, and the lowest prevalence of biological markers for poor artery health ever recorded around the world (Pontzer et al., 2018). Thus, any putative relationship between social position and heart health is unlikely to be the result of differences in health behaviour.
Overall, Jaeggi et al. discovered consistent links between wealth-related circumstances and blood pressure in the Tsimane: the poorer the individual, the higher their blood pressure. In people over the age of 15, the pressure on artery walls during and between heartbeats was lower in those with higher household wealth, that is, those with more common household assets: this can include traditional goods made from local organic materials, industrially produced items acquired through trade or purchase, and livestock. The researchers also investigated the association between wealth inequality and overall health in several geographically separated communities – defined as clusters of households connected through kin networks that produce or consume food together. They found that communities with greater inequality between rich and poor members had higher blood pressure.
Most Tsimane have normal blood pressure. This means that associations between wealth and individual blood pressure within communities, or between wealth inequality and overall blood pressure across communities both capture variations below a clinically significant level (Jaeggi et al., 2021; Pontzer et al., 2018). However, these findings are not inconsequential: in post-industrial societies, small reductions in blood pressure in the overall population have proved effective in lowering CHD incidence (Cook et al., 1995).
If no members of the Tsimane population live an unhealthy lifestyle, and if they all have little to no access to healthcare, then what drives higher blood pressure in poorer adults and in more unequal communities? Psychosocial mechanisms and pathways to poor health may provide an answer, drawing on how feelings which result from inequality, domination, or subordination may directly alter biological processes (Bartley, 2017). Social hierarchies, maintained by societal arrangements of power, lead to disadvantaged populations being disproportionally exposed to psychosocial stressors such as lack of community support, low control and autonomy, and an imbalance between effort and reward. In turn, psychosocial stress can have a severe impact on the body, triggering a sustained fight or flight response and altering the hormone system that controls biological reactions to stress (Bartley, 2017; Jaeggi et al., 2021).
Jaeggi et al. therefore tested how psychosocial factors related to unequal wealth and wealth distribution may have influenced feelings and interactions among the Tsimane (e.g., depression, social conflicts), or altered their body chemistry (e.g., the level of the stress hormone cortisol in urine). The analyses highlighted a weak connection between these factors and increased levels of blood pressure in individuals who possess less wealth or are from more unequal communities. However, this link may only be weakly supported by the analyses because the markers used could have insufficiently measured psychosocial stress. It may therefore be worth also examining whether a pathway can be identified when looking at C-reactive protein, an inflammatory biomarker for blood pressure which is relatively elevated in the Tsimane population (Pontzer et al., 2018). Yet, detecting these small effects in such a healthy society requires a large sample size, and psychosocial markers were only collected in a subset of participants with blood pressure data: thus, it is more likely that the analyses were underpowered.
The Tsimane face growing exposure to psychosocial stress as contact with ethnic majority groups increase, and their economy becomes more integrated. These developments urge researchers to explore individual-level and macro-level mechanisms for health inequality in the Tsimane, and remind us, once again, to look beyond lifestyle when tackling public health problems.
BookHealth Inequality: An Introduction to Concepts, Theories and MethodsCambridge Polity Press.
Implications of small reductions in diastolic blood pressure for primary preventionArchives of Internal Medicine 155:701–709.https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1995.00430070053006
WebsiteGBD compareAccessed June 8, 2021.
How western diet and lifestyle drive the pandemic of obesity and civilization diseasesDiabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy 12:2221–2236.https://doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S216791
Commentary: Risk factors or social causes?International Journal of Epidemiology 33:297–298.https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyh084
Hunter-gatherers as models in public healthObesity Reviews 19:24–35.https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12785
Article and author information
- Version of Record published: June 24, 2021 (version 1)
© 2021, Ruiz
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
- Page views
Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
- Epidemiology and Global Health
Denmark was one of the few countries where it was politically decided to continue cancer screening during the COVID-19 pandemic. We assessed the actual population uptake of mammography and cervical screening during this period.
The first COVID-19 lockdown in Denmark was announced on 11 March 2020. To investigate possible changes in cancer screening activity due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we analysed data from the beginning of 2017 until the end of 2021. A time series analysis was carried out to discover possible trends and outliers in the screening activities in the period 2017–2021. Data on mammography screening and cervical screening were retrieved from governmental pandemic-specific monitoring of health care activities.
A brief drop was seen in screening activity right after the first COVID-19 lockdown, but the activity quickly returned to its previous level. A short-term deficit of 43% [CI –49 to –37] was found for mammography screening. A short-term deficit of 62% [CI –65 to –58] was found for cervical screening. Furthermore, a slight, statistically significant downward trend in cervical screening from 2018 to 2021 was probably unrelated to the pandemic. Other changes, for example, a marked drop in mammography screening towards the end of 2021, also seem unrelated to the pandemic.
Denmark continued cancer screening during the pandemic, but following the first lockdown a temporary drop was seen in breast and cervical screening activity.
Region Zealand (R22-A597).
- Epidemiology and Global Health
To curb the initial spread of SARS-CoV-2, many countries relied on nation-wide implementation of non-pharmaceutical intervention measures, resulting in substantial socio-economic impacts. Potentially, subnational implementations might have had less of a societal impact, but comparable epidemiological impact. Here, using the first COVID-19 wave in the Netherlands as a case in point, we address this issue by developing a high-resolution analysis framework that uses a demographically stratified population and a spatially explicit, dynamic, individual contact-pattern based epidemiology, calibrated to hospital admissions data and mobility trends extracted from mobile phone signals and Google. We demonstrate how a subnational approach could achieve similar level of epidemiological control in terms of hospital admissions, while some parts of the country could stay open for a longer period. Our framework is exportable to other countries and settings, and may be used to develop policies on subnational approach as a better strategic choice for controlling future epidemics.