Mixed cytomegalovirus genotypes in HIV positive mothers show compartmentalization and distinct patterns of transmission to infants

  1. Juanita Pang
  2. Jennifer A Slyker
  3. Sunando Roy
  4. Josephine Bryant
  5. Claire Atkinson
  6. Juliana Cudini
  7. Carey Farquhar
  8. Paul Griffiths
  9. James Kiarie
  10. Sofia Morfopoulou
  11. Alison C Roxby
  12. Helena Tutil
  13. Rachel Williams
  14. Soren Gantt
  15. Richard A Goldstein
  16. Judith Breuer  Is a corresponding author
  1. University College London, United Kingdom
  2. University of Washington, United States
  3. University College of London, United Kingdom
  4. University of Nairobi, Kenya
  5. University of Montréal, Canada

Abstract

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the commonest cause of congenital infection (cCMVi) and particularly so among infants born to HIV-infected women. Studies of cCMVi pathogenesis are complicated by the presence of multiple infecting maternal CMV strains, especially in HIV-positive women, and the large, recombinant CMV genome. Using newly developed tools to reconstruct CMV haplotypes, we demonstrate anatomic CMV compartmentalization in five HIV-infected mothers and identify the possibility of congenitally transmitted genotypes in three of their infants. A single CMV strain was transmitted in each congenitally infected case, and all were closely related to those that predominate in the cognate maternal cervix. Compared to non-transmitted strains, these congenitally transmitted CMV strains showed statistically significant similarities in 19 genes associated with tissue-tropism and immunomodulation. In all infants, incident superinfections with distinct strains from breast milk were captured during follow-up. The results represent potentially important new insights into the virologic determinants of early CMV infection.

Data availability

Sequence reads have been deposited in NCBI Sequence Read Archive under BioProject ID PRJNA605798.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Juanita Pang

    Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Jennifer A Slyker

    Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Sunando Roy

    Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Josephine Bryant

    Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Claire Atkinson

    Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Juliana Cudini

    Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Carey Farquhar

    Departments of Global Health, Epidemiology, Medicine (Div. Allergy and Infectious Diseases), University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Paul Griffiths

    University College of London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. James Kiarie

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Sofia Morfopoulou

    Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Alison C Roxby

    Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Helena Tutil

    Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Rachel Williams

    Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Soren Gantt

    Infectious Diseases and Immunology, University of Montréal, Montréal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5743-3606
  15. Richard A Goldstein

    Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5148-4672
  16. Judith Breuer

    Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    j.breuer@ucl.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8246-0534

Funding

EUFP7 (304875)

  • Judith Breuer

UCL/UCLH NIHR Biomedical Research Centre

  • Judith Breuer

Sir Henry Wellcome Fellowship

  • Sofia Morfopoulou

Sir Henry Wellcome Fellowships

  • Josephine Bryant

Wellcome Trust (204870)

  • Paul Griffiths

NIH National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI087369)

  • Jennifer A Slyker

NIH National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI027757)

  • Jennifer A Slyker

NIH National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI076105)

  • Carey Farquhar

NIH National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI087399)

  • Carey Farquhar

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD057773-01)

  • Carey Farquhar

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD054314)

  • Carey Farquhar

Rosetreees Trust PhD Studentship (M876)

  • Juanita Pang

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Margaret Stanley, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom

Version history

  1. Received: September 17, 2020
  2. Accepted: December 31, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: December 31, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: January 13, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Pang et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,021
    Page views
  • 149
    Downloads
  • 14
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Juanita Pang
  2. Jennifer A Slyker
  3. Sunando Roy
  4. Josephine Bryant
  5. Claire Atkinson
  6. Juliana Cudini
  7. Carey Farquhar
  8. Paul Griffiths
  9. James Kiarie
  10. Sofia Morfopoulou
  11. Alison C Roxby
  12. Helena Tutil
  13. Rachel Williams
  14. Soren Gantt
  15. Richard A Goldstein
  16. Judith Breuer
(2020)
Mixed cytomegalovirus genotypes in HIV positive mothers show compartmentalization and distinct patterns of transmission to infants
eLife 9:e63199.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63199

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63199

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Jean-David Larouche, Céline M Laumont ... Claude Perreault
    Research Article

    Transposable elements (TEs) are repetitive sequences representing ~45% of the human and mouse genomes and are highly expressed by medullary thymic epithelial cells (mTECs). In this study, we investigated the role of TEs on T-cell development in the thymus. We performed multiomic analyses of TEs in human and mouse thymic cells to elucidate their role in T-cell development. We report that TE expression in the human thymus is high and shows extensive age- and cell lineage-related variations. TE expression correlates with multiple transcription factors in all cell types of the human thymus. Two cell types express particularly broad TE repertoires: mTECs and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs). In mTECs, transcriptomic data suggest that TEs interact with transcription factors essential for mTEC development and function (e.g., PAX1 and REL), and immunopeptidomic data showed that TEs generate MHC-I-associated peptides implicated in thymocyte education. Notably, AIRE, FEZF2, and CHD4 regulate small yet non-redundant sets of TEs in murine mTECs. Human thymic pDCs homogenously express large numbers of TEs that likely form dsRNA, which can activate innate immune receptors, potentially explaining why thymic pDCs constitutively secrete IFN ɑ/β. This study highlights the diversity of interactions between TEs and the adaptive immune system. TEs are genetic parasites, and the two thymic cell types most affected by TEs (mTEcs and pDCs) are essential to establishing central T-cell tolerance. Therefore, we propose that orchestrating TE expression in thymic cells is critical to prevent autoimmunity in vertebrates.

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    Pianpian Zhao, Zhifeng Sheng ... Hou-Feng Zheng
    Research Article

    The ‘diabetic bone paradox’ suggested that type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients would have higher areal bone mineral density (BMD) but higher fracture risk than individuals without T2D. In this study, we found that the genetically predicted T2D was associated with higher BMD and lower risk of fracture in both weighted genetic risk score (wGRS) and two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses. We also identified ten genomic loci shared between T2D and fracture, with the top signal at SNP rs4580892 in the intron of gene RSPO3. And the higher expression in adipose subcutaneous and higher protein level in plasma of RSPO3 were associated with increased risk of T2D, but decreased risk of fracture. In the prospective study, T2D was observed to be associated with higher risk of fracture, but BMI mediated 30.2% of the protective effect. However, when stratified by the T2D-related risk factors for fracture, we observed that the effect of T2D on the risk of fracture decreased when the number of T2D-related risk factors decreased, and the association became non-significant if the T2D patients carried none of the risk factors. In conclusion, the genetically determined T2D might not be associated with higher risk of fracture. And the shared genetic architecture between T2D and fracture suggested a top signal around RSPO3 gene. The observed effect size of T2D on fracture risk decreased if the T2D-related risk factors could be eliminated. Therefore, it is important to manage the complications of T2D to prevent the risk of fracture.