Post-acute COVID-19 associated with evidence of bystander T-cell activation and a recurring AMR bacterial pneumonia

Abstract

Here we describe the case of a COVID-19 patient who developed recurring ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa that acquired increasing levels of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in response to treatment. Metagenomic analysis revealed the AMR genotype, while immunological analysis revealed massive and escalating levels of T-cell activation. These were both SARS-CoV-2 and P. aeruginosa specific, and bystander activated, which may have contributed to this patient's persistent symptoms and radiological changes.

Data availability

Human-filtered sequencing data for this study have been deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) at EMBL-EBI under accession PRJEB40239.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Michaela Gregorova

    School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1605-0558
  2. Daniel Morse

    School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Tarcisio Brignoli

    School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Joseph Steventon

    School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Fergus Hamilton

    Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Mahableshwar Albur

    Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9792-7280
  7. David Arnold

    Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3158-7740
  8. Matthew Thomas

    Intensive Care Unit, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Alice Halliday

    School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Holly Baum

    School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Christopher Rice

    School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Matthew B Avison

    School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Andrew D Davidson

    School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1136-4008
  14. Marianna Santopaolo

    School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Elizabeth Oliver

    School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Anu Goenka

    School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Adam Finn

    School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Linda Wooldridge

    Bristol Veterinary School in the Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Borko Amulic

    School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  20. Rosemary J Boyton

    Lung Immunology Group, Section of Infectious Disease and Immunity, Department of Medicine, MRC & Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, Centre for Respiratory Infection Imperial College, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  21. Daniel M Altmann

    Human Disease Immunogenetics Group, Section of Infectious Disease and Immunity, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London W12 ONN, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  22. David K Butler

    Lung Immunology Group, Section of Infectious Disease and Immunity, Department of Medicine, MRC & Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, Centre for Respiratory Infection Imperial Coll, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  23. Claire McMurray

    Institute of Microbiology and Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  24. Joanna Stockton

    Institute of Microbiology and Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  25. Sam Nicholls

    Institute of Microbiology and Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  26. Charles Cooper

    Institute of Microbiology and Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  27. Nicholas Loman

    Institute of Microbiology and Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  28. Michael J Cox

    Institute of Microbiology and Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  29. Laura Rivino

    School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    laura.rivino@bristol.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  30. Ruth C Massey

    School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    ruth.massey@bristol.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8154-4039

Funding

Southmead Hospital Charity

  • Fergus Hamilton

Wellcome Trust (212258/Z/18/Z)

  • Ruth C Massey

Elizabeth Blackwell Institute

  • Laura Rivino

UKRI (MR/S019553/1)

  • Rosemary J Boyton

UKRI (MR/R02622X/1)

  • Daniel M Altmann

Cystic Fibrosis Trust (CF Trust SRC 015)

  • David K Butler

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Anurag Agrawal, CSIR Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, India

Ethics

Human subjects: The patient was enrolled onto the DISCOVER study (Diagnostic and Severity markers of COVID-19 to Enable Rapid triage study), a single centre prospective study recruiting consecutive patients admitted with COVID-19, from 30.03.2020 until present (Ethics approval via South Yorkshire REC: 20/YH/0121, CRN approval no: 45469). Blood/serum samples from pre-pandemic healthy controls and asymptomatic healthy controls were obtained under the Bristol Biobank (NHS Research Ethics Committee approval ref 14/WA/1253).

Version history

  1. Received: September 24, 2020
  2. Accepted: December 16, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: December 17, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: December 31, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Gregorova et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,051
    views
  • 343
    downloads
  • 25
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Michaela Gregorova
  2. Daniel Morse
  3. Tarcisio Brignoli
  4. Joseph Steventon
  5. Fergus Hamilton
  6. Mahableshwar Albur
  7. David Arnold
  8. Matthew Thomas
  9. Alice Halliday
  10. Holly Baum
  11. Christopher Rice
  12. Matthew B Avison
  13. Andrew D Davidson
  14. Marianna Santopaolo
  15. Elizabeth Oliver
  16. Anu Goenka
  17. Adam Finn
  18. Linda Wooldridge
  19. Borko Amulic
  20. Rosemary J Boyton
  21. Daniel M Altmann
  22. David K Butler
  23. Claire McMurray
  24. Joanna Stockton
  25. Sam Nicholls
  26. Charles Cooper
  27. Nicholas Loman
  28. Michael J Cox
  29. Laura Rivino
  30. Ruth C Massey
(2020)
Post-acute COVID-19 associated with evidence of bystander T-cell activation and a recurring AMR bacterial pneumonia
eLife 9:e63430.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63430

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63430

Further reading

    1. Epidemiology and Global Health
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Patrick E Brown, Sze Hang Fu ... Ab-C Study Collaborators
    Research Article Updated

    Background:

    Few national-level studies have evaluated the impact of ‘hybrid’ immunity (vaccination coupled with recovery from infection) from the Omicron variants of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).

    Methods:

    From May 2020 to December 2022, we conducted serial assessments (each of ~4000–9000 adults) examining SARS-CoV-2 antibodies within a mostly representative Canadian cohort drawn from a national online polling platform. Adults, most of whom were vaccinated, reported viral test-confirmed infections and mailed self-collected dried blood spots (DBSs) to a central lab. Samples underwent highly sensitive and specific antibody assays to spike and nucleocapsid protein antigens, the latter triggered only by infection. We estimated cumulative SARS-CoV-2 incidence prior to the Omicron period and during the BA.1/1.1 and BA.2/5 waves. We assessed changes in antibody levels and in age-specific active immunity levels.

    Results:

    Spike levels were higher in infected than in uninfected adults, regardless of vaccination doses. Among adults vaccinated at least thrice and infected more than 6 months earlier, spike levels fell notably and continuously for the 9-month post-vaccination. In contrast, among adults infected within 6 months, spike levels declined gradually. Declines were similar by sex, age group, and ethnicity. Recent vaccination attenuated declines in spike levels from older infections. In a convenience sample, spike antibody and cellular responses were correlated. Near the end of 2022, about 35% of adults above age 60 had their last vaccine dose more than 6 months ago, and about 25% remained uninfected. The cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection rose from 13% (95% confidence interval 11–14%) before omicron to 78% (76–80%) by December 2022, equating to 25 million infected adults cumulatively. However, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) weekly death rate during the BA.2/5 waves was less than half of that during the BA.1/1.1 wave, implying a protective role for hybrid immunity.

    Conclusions:

    Strategies to maintain population-level hybrid immunity require up-to-date vaccination coverage, including among those recovering from infection. Population-based, self-collected DBSs are a practicable biological surveillance platform.

    Funding:

    Funding was provided by the COVID-19 Immunity Task Force, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Pfizer Global Medical Grants, and St. Michael’s Hospital Foundation. PJ and ACG are funded by the Canada Research Chairs Program.

    1. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Alejandro Prieto, Luïsa Miró ... Antonio Juarez
    Research Article

    Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a significant threat to human health. Although vaccines have been developed to combat AMR, it has proven challenging to associate specific vaccine antigens with AMR. Bacterial plasmids play a crucial role in the transmission of AMR. Our recent research has identified a group of bacterial plasmids (specifically, IncHI plasmids) that encode large molecular mass proteins containing bacterial immunoglobulin-like domains. These proteins are found on the external surface of the bacterial cells, such as in the flagella or conjugative pili. In this study, we show that these proteins are antigenic and can protect mice from infection caused by an AMR Salmonella strain harboring one of these plasmids. Furthermore, we successfully generated nanobodies targeting these proteins, that were shown to interfere with the conjugative transfer of IncHI plasmids. Considering that these proteins are also encoded in other groups of plasmids, such as IncA/C and IncP2, targeting them could be a valuable strategy in combating AMR infections caused by bacteria harboring different groups of AMR plasmids. Since the selected antigens are directly linked to AMR itself, the protective effect extends beyond specific microorganisms to include all those carrying the corresponding resistance plasmids.