1. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine

GSK3 inhibition rescues growth and telomere dysfunction in dyskeratosis congenita iPSC-derived type II alveolar epithelial cells

  1. Rafael Jesus Fernandez
  2. Zachary JG Gardner
  3. Katherine J Slovik
  4. Derek C Liberti
  5. Katrina N Estep
  6. Wenli Yang
  7. Qijun Chen
  8. Garrett T Santini
  9. Javier V Perez
  10. Sarah Root
  11. Ranvir Bhatia
  12. John W Tobias
  13. Apoorva Babu
  14. Michael P Morley
  15. David B Frank
  16. Edward E Morrisey
  17. Christopher J Lengner  Is a corresponding author
  18. F Brad Johnson  Is a corresponding author
  1. Medical Scientist Training Program, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, United States
  2. Cell and Molecular Biology Graduate Group, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, United States
  3. Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, United States
  4. Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, United States
  5. Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, United States
  6. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, United States
  7. College of Arts and Sciences and Vagelos Scholars Program, University of Pennsylvania, United States
  8. Penn Genomic Analysis Core, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, United States
  9. Penn Cardiovascular Institute, University of Pennsylvania, United States
  10. Penn-CHOP Lung Biology Institute, University of Pennsylvania, United States
  11. Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, United States
  12. Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, United States
  13. Institute on Aging, University of Pennsylvania, United States
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64430
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Rafael Jesus Fernandez
  2. Zachary JG Gardner
  3. Katherine J Slovik
  4. Derek C Liberti
  5. Katrina N Estep
  6. Wenli Yang
  7. Qijun Chen
  8. Garrett T Santini
  9. Javier V Perez
  10. Sarah Root
  11. Ranvir Bhatia
  12. John W Tobias
  13. Apoorva Babu
  14. Michael P Morley
  15. David B Frank
  16. Edward E Morrisey
  17. Christopher J Lengner
  18. F Brad Johnson
(2022)
GSK3 inhibition rescues growth and telomere dysfunction in dyskeratosis congenita iPSC-derived type II alveolar epithelial cells
eLife 11:e64430.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64430
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

Dyskeratosis congenita (DC) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by deficiencies in telomere maintenance leading to very short telomeres and the premature onset of certain age-related diseases, including pulmonary fibrosis (PF). PF is thought to derive from epithelial failure, particularly that of type II alveolar epithelial (AT2) cells, which are highly dependent on Wnt signaling during development and adult regeneration. We use human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived AT2 (iAT2) cells to model how short telomeres affect AT2 cells. Cultured DC mutant iAT2 cells accumulate shortened, uncapped telomeres and manifest defects in the growth of alveolospheres, hallmarks of senescence, and apparent defects in Wnt signaling. The GSK3 inhibitor, CHIR99021, which mimics the output of canonical Wnt signaling, enhances telomerase activity and rescues the defects. These findings support further investigation of Wnt agonists as potential therapies for DC-related pathologies.

Editor's evaluation

This study reports a new cell line model for Dyskeratosis congenita. The authors characterized this model by examining its ability to form organoids and its defects in telomeres. Transcriptomics analysis unveiled defects in Wnt signaling, and treatment with a Wnt agonist could rescue these defects and enhance telomerase activity. Overall, the study is well designed and executed, the data presented are clear and convincing and the conclusions should be of great interest to researchers studying Dyskeratosis congenita and telomere biology.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64430.sa0

Introduction

Dyskeratosis congenita (DC) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by bone marrow failure, skin abnormalities, elevated risk of certain cancers, and liver and pulmonary fibrosis (PF). These pathologies are caused by abnormally shortened and uncapped telomeres arising from deficiencies in telomere maintenance, typically due to defects in the action of telomerase. Significant progress has been made in treating the bone marrow failure of DC patients, particularly via transplantation, but PF remains a major life-limiting pathology (Agarwal, 2018; Dietz et al., 2011).

PF is a subtype of interstitial pneumonia that is chronic and progressive, replacing the normal lace-like alveolar architecture with patchy, hyperproliferative fibrous tissue (Lederer and Martinez, 2018). Current therapies are only modestly effective and do not reverse the underlying fibrosis, and lung transplantation is not always an option (King et al., 2014; Lederer and Martinez, 2018; Richeldi et al., 2014; Valapour et al., 2020). While much of the early work in PF pathogenesis focused on unraveling the contributions of fibroblasts, genetic studies of families with a predisposition to PF argue that defects in alveolar epithelial cells and telomeres are key drivers of disease (Alder et al., 2015; Armanios et al., 2007; Bullard et al., 2005; Cogan et al., 2015; Haschek and Witschi, 1979; Kropski et al., 2015; Maitra et al., 2010; Thomas et al., 2002; Wang et al., 2009). Recent work in mice shows that dysfunctional type II alveolar epithelial (AT2) cells, the putative stem cells of alveoli (Barkauskas et al., 2013), can lead to a progressive chronic fibrotic response similar to that seen in patients (Nureki et al., 2018). Furthermore, many of the same genes which when mutated cause DC have also been linked to familial PF (Alder et al., 2015; Armanios et al., 2007; Cogan et al., 2015; Kropski et al., 2017). In sporadic PF, both age and short telomeres are risk factors, and these risks are linked because age is associated with telomere shortening in the lung, particularly in AT2 cells (Alder et al., 2008; Everaerts et al., 2018). Consistent with a role for telomere dysfunction in driving PF, AT2 cells in sporadic PF express hallmarks of senescence and have shorter telomeres in fibrotic regions than those in non-fibrotic regions (Disayabutr et al., 2016; Kropski et al., 2015; Snetselaar et al., 2017). Additionally, two human Mendelian randomization studies argue that short telomeres are a cause of PF (Duckworth et al., 2020; Telomeres Mendelian Randomization Collaboration et al., 2017). Murine studies also argue that telomere dysfunction and senescence in AT2 cells can drive PF (Naikawadi et al., 2016; Povedano et al., 2015; Yao et al., 2019). Although causality is thus evident, exactly how AT2 cell telomere dysfunction leads to PF is poorly understood.

Previous work in our lab using mouse and human induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cell-derived organoid models of DC intestinal defects uncovered a positive feedback loop by which telomere capping and canonical Wnt signaling support one another under normal conditions to maintain the intestinal stem cell niche (Woo et al., 2016; Yang et al., 2017). In the setting of telomere dysfunction, this virtuous cycle becomes vicious: the resulting suppression of Wnt signaling interferes with stem cell function directly, and it also amplifies telomere dysfunction by diminishing Wnt-dependent expression of telomere maintenance factors, including the catalytic subunit of telomerase, TERT, and several of the telomere-protective shelterins. These studies demonstrated that Wnt pathway agonists (including GSK3 inhibitors, which mimic the inhibition of GSK3 by Wnts) can rescue these defects, raising the possibility that Wnt agonism could be of therapeutic benefit in DC. Given how telomere dysfunction in AT2 cells appears to drive PF, we wondered if Wnt agonism might be of benefit in PF. Wnt signaling is important for lung epithelial cell development (Frank et al., 2016; Goss et al., 2009; Li et al., 2002; Li et al., 2005; Maretto et al., 2003; Okubo and Hogan, 2004; Ostrin et al., 2018; Shu et al., 2005) and regeneration of the adult lung in response to injury (Nabhan et al., 2018; Zacharias et al., 2018). On the one hand, there is evidence that Wnts may drive PF; for example, they have been found to be upregulated in patients with PF (Chilosi et al., 2003; Königshoff et al., 2008; Königshoff et al., 2009). On the other hand, when the canonical Wnt transcriptional effector β-catenin is deleted in AT2 cells, mice are sensitized to bleomcyin induced PF (Tanjore et al., 2013). Wnt signaling is complex and context dependent (Wiese et al., 2018), and the exact spatial, temporal, and cell-type specificity of Wnt signaling in PF remains an area of intense investigation. It is difficult to extrapolate from observational pathologic studies of fully developed PF to the potential functional impact of Wnts at earlier stages of the disease, and the large number of interacting cell types in PF lungs also makes it challenging to identify primary drivers in such studies. Furthermore, differences between mouse and human telomere biology together with the generally lower susceptibility of mice to PF make mouse modeling difficult. We therefore generated AT2 cell organoids by directed differentiation of human iPSCs (iPSC-derived AT2 [iAT2] cells) to explore how telomere dysfunction might impact their function (Jacob et al., 2017; Jacob et al., 2019).

By comparing iAT2s that are isogenic except for an introduced mutation in the gene most often mutated in DC, X-linked DKC1, we show that mutant iAT2 cells become senescent in concert with telomere shortening and uncapping. iAT2 cells with short, uncapped telomeres exhibit gene expression changes consistent with decreased Wnt signaling, and treatment with GSK3 inhibitors, such as CHIR99021, rescues their growth and telomere dysfunction. These findings raise the possibility that Wnt agonists may be of benefit in rescuing the stem cell and telomere defects of AT2 cells associated with PF in DC patients.

Results

Engineering a DKC1 mutation into iPS cells

To model the AT2 cells from DC patients, we engineered a well-characterized, causal DC mutation in DKC1 (DKC1 A386T) (Agarwal et al., 2010; Batista et al., 2011; Woo et al., 2016) into the BU3 NKX2.1::GFP SFTPC::TdTomato (NGST) human iPS cell line (Jacob et al., 2017). We established an isogenic pair of cell lines: an introduced mutant line and a corresponding unedited wild-type (WT) line (Figure 1—figure supplement 1A-C). Both iPS lines maintained markers of pluripotency and normal karyotypes after the introduction of the DKC1 A386T mutation (Figure 1—figure supplement 1D).

Previous work (Agarwal et al., 2010; Batista et al., 2011; Woo et al., 2016) established that iPS cells with the DKC1 A386T mutation exhibit decreased telomerase activity resulting in telomere shortening with passage. We confirmed that telomerase activity was reduced, and telomeres shortened with successive passages, in the BU3 NGST DKC1 A386T iPS cell line when compared to its WT control (Figure 1—figure supplement 2A-C).

iAT2 cells with short telomeres fail to form alveolospheres and grow in size

We next differentiated these paired iPS cell lines into iAT2 cells using the protocol developed by Jacob et al. (see Figure 1A for differentiation strategy, Figure 1—figure supplement 3A, B for representative sorting strategies). Using iPSCs 35 passages after the introduction of the mutation yielded iAT2s that initially grew in a similar fashion to WT, but which over time developed a growth defect characterized by lower alveolosphere formation efficiency as well as smaller alveolospheres. The phenotype became apparent by 50 days of culture (D50) and was dramatic by D70 (Figure 1A–C). In contrast, using iPSCs only five passages after the introduction of the mutation yielded iAT2s with less dramatic defects in alveolosphere growth and size at D70 (Figure 1—figure supplement 4A-C). These data indicate that the defects observed were due to progressive telomere shortening after introducing the DKC1 mutation, and not the immediate effects of telomerase deficiency (or other potential deficiencies) caused by the DKC1 A386T mutation per se.

Figure 1 with 4 supplements see all
Download asset Open asset
Dyskeratosis congenita induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived type II alveolar epithelial cells (iAT2s) fail to form alveolospheres with successive passaging.

(A) Differentiation protocol used to probe the effects of the DKC1 A386T mutation on iAT2 cells. D.E., definitive endoderm specification; Ant., anteriorization. (B) Representative images of differentiating wild type and DKC1 A386T mutant bearing iAT2 alveolospheres (scale bars, 100 µm as indicated for iPS and NKX2.1+ progenitors; 1 mm for all alveolosphere images). (C) Quantifications of alveolosphere area and formation efficiency on D70 (n = 4; ** p<0.01, **** p<0.0001, and Student’s t-test). (D) Quantification of the percentage SFTPC+ cells and the number of SFTPC+ cells produced with passage of the iAT2 cells shows DKC1 A386T iAT2 alveolospheres accumulate fewer SFTPC+ cells (n = 4; ** p<0.01, and Student’s t-test). (E) RNA-seq of sorted SFTPC+ iAT2 cells at different passages shows AT2 cell genes are not grossly affected by the DKC1 A386T mutation (n = 4, W = wild type, M = mutant).

Figure 1—source data 1

Source Data for Figure 1C-E.

Figure 1C-SourceData-FormationEfficiency&OrganoidArea.pzfx – Raw counts of organoid counts normalized to number of cells input to calculate formation efficiency as well as area measurements along with statistical tests. Figure 1D-SourceData-SFTPC%&SFTPCCumYield.pzfx – Percentage SFTPC+ along the differentiation of the induced pluripotent stem cell-derived type II alveolar epithelial cells (iAT2s) from sort flow plots along with cumulative yield of surfactant protein C calculated as the number of SFTPC+ cells produced over the experiment over time. Figure 1E-SourceData-AT2Markers.pzfx – Raw counts from RNA-seq of iAT2s over the differentiation specifically looking at AT2 markers.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/64430/elife-64430-fig1-data1-v2.zip

Surfactant protein C (SFTPC) is a highly specific marker of AT2 cells (Kalina et al., 1992), and the yield of SFTPC::TdTomato+ (SFTPC+) cells was reduced significantly at D70 in DKC1 mutant cultures, while the percentage of SFTPC+ cells generated at each time point was not different, suggesting that there is a defect in AT2 cell proliferation or survival (Figure 1D). Sorted SFTPC+ cells from iAT2 cell alveolospheres maintained expression of multiple AT2 specific genes suggesting that the introduced mutation did not affect lineage specification (Figure 1E). Thus, DC iPS cells can generate iAT2 cell alveolospheres; however, these alveolospheres lose the capacity to self-renew with successive passaging.

DC iAT2 cells derived from iPS cells 35 passages after introduction of the mutation develop hallmarks of senescence at late passage (D70)

To better understand the AT2 cell defects, we further compared the WT and mutant iAT2 alveolospheres at different passages. RNA-seq-based gene expression analyses over successive passages of sorted SFTPC+ cells from iAT2 alveolospheres showed decreases in proliferation markers (MKI67 and MCM2) as well as an increase in expression of the cell cycle inhibitor CDKN1A (p21), and these changes were most pronounced in mutant alveolospheres (Figure 2A). Immunofluorescence microscopy based analyses of D70 mutant iAT2 alveolospheres showed an increase in DNA damage marked by 53BP1 foci (Figure 2B), and an increased fraction of cells expressing p21 protein (Figure 2C), but no increase in apoptosis (Figure 2—figure supplement 1A-C). Measuring telomere length using qPCR, DC, and WT iAT2 cells showed no significant change in average telomere length with passage, although average telomere lengths in mutants trended shorter than in WT (Figure 2—figure supplement 2A). However, measuring telomere lengths using TeSLA (Lai et al., 2017), which is more sensitive for the detection of short telomeres than most other techniques, revealed that DC iAT2 cells had a preponderance of short telomeres at D70 (Figure 2E–F). Consistent with this, DC iAT2 alveolospheres showed an increased number of telomere dysfunction induced foci (TIFs), a hallmark of uncapped telomeres (i.e., telomeres that signal DNA damage responses and cell cycle checkpoint arrest Takai et al., 2003; Figure 2D). These findings indicate that the short and uncapped telomeres that accumulate with passage of DC iAT2 cells lead them to senesce.

Figure 2 with 2 supplements see all
Download asset Open asset
Dyskeratosis congenita induced pluripotent stem cell-derived type II alveolar epithelial cells (iAT2s) 35 passages after introduction of the mutation at D70 show hallmarks of senescence.

(A) Gene expression profiling of iAT2 cells at D28 and D50 shows no difference between wild type and DKC1 A386T in expression of markers of proliferation and a cell cycle inhibitor, while at D70 cells, there is a significant decrease in MCM2 and MKI67 as well as a significant increase in CDKN1A (p21) (n = 4, **** p<0.0001, DEseq2 pairwise contrast statistics). (B) At D70, DKC1 A386T mutant iAT2 cells have a higher fraction of cells with 53BP1 foci (n = 4, * p<0.05, and Student’s t-test; scale bars, 10 µm; insets highlight cells with 53BP1 foci as noted by the white arrowheads). (C) At D70, DKC1 A386T mutant iAT2s have a higher fraction of cells positive for p21 (n = 4, * p<0.05, and student’s t-test; scale bars, 10 µm). (D) At D70, DKC1 A386T mutant iAT2s have a higher fraction of cells with telomere dysfunction induced foci (TIFs) (n = 4, * p<0.05, and Student’s t-test; scale bars, 10 µm; insets highlight cells with TIFs, each one noted by a white arrowhead). (E) Representative TeSLA of DKC1 A386T iAT2 alveolospheres shows telomeres shorten with passage. (F) Quantification of DKC1 A386T iAT2 cell telomere lengths shows a preponderance of short telomeres appears as the iAT2 cells approach D70, red colored data points highlight telomeres under the 1.6 kb threshold (n = 2, ‘shortest 20%’ reports the 20th percentile of telomere length, in Kb).

Figure 2—source data 1

Source data for Figure 2.

Figure 2A-SourceData-iAT2-SenescentGeneExpression.pzfx – Raw counts from RNA-seq of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived type II alveolar epithelial cells over the differentiation specifically looking at specific senescence related genes.

Figure 2B-SourceData-53BP1PositiveCounts.pzfx – Raw counts of 53BP1 positive cells along with statistics. Figure 2C-SourceData-p21PositiveCounts.pzfx – Raw counts of p21 positive cells along with statistics. Figure 2D-SourceData-TIFPhenotype.pzfx – Raw counts of telomere dysfunction induced foci positive cells along with statistics. Figure 2E,F-SourceData-2020-08-31-TeSLABlotMerged-Cropped.tiff – Uncropped raw image of TeSLA blot along the differentiation showing where the crop was placed for Figure 2E. This is the same blot as used in Figure 4—figure supplement 3B. Figure 2E,F-SourceData-2020-08-31-TeSLABlotMerged.tiff – Uncropped raw image of TeSLA blot along the differentiation showing where the crop was placed for Figure 2E. This is the same blot as used in Figure 4—figure supplement 3B. Figure 2E,F-SourceData-TeSLADKC1A386TAlongDiff.pzfx – Raw counts from TeSLA quant software analysis of cropped blot looking at telomere length along the differentiation along with statistical analysis.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/64430/elife-64430-fig2-data1-v2.zip

RNA-seq reveals pathways differentially expressed in DC iAT2 cells, including those related to Wnt signaling

To further understand changes in the DC iAT2 cells, we more broadly evaluated RNA-seq-based gene expression changes of sorted SFTPC+ iAT2 cells. (Figure 3A). We found very few significantly differentially expressed genes when comparing WT and mutant cells at D28 and D50, but a large number of differentially expressed genes at D70 (Figure 3B), arguing that the gene expression changes seen at D70 are likely driven by uncapped telomeres. Gene set enrichment analyses (GSEA) revealed an upregulation of the DNA damage response, the unfolded protein response (UPR), mitochondrial related functions (oxidative phosphorylation, the respiratory electron chain), a downregulation of hypoxia related signaling, and hedgehog signaling along with other changes (see Supplementary file 1 for a full list). Ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) revealed similar changes as well as defects in multiple pathways controlled by inflammatory cytokines like IL1β, IL6, IL17, and others (see Supplementary file 2 for the full lists). We found a marked upregulation in DC iAT2 cells of many pathways associated with PF (see Supplementary file 3 for curated list of PF related pathways, see Supplementary files 1 and 2 for the unedited analyses). These included the UPR (Lawson et al., 2008; Mulugeta et al., 2005), thyroid hormone metabolism (Yu et al., 2018), p53 signaling (Shetty et al., 2017), mitochondrial dysfunction and mitophagy (Chung et al., 2019; Yu et al., 2018), and caveolin function (Wang et al., 2006). This analysis also showed an upregulation of non-canonical Wnt signaling (Figure 3C), which correlated with a significant upregulation in WNT5A and WNT11, known non-canonical Wnt ligands (Figure 3D). Furthermore, almost every FZD gene, encoding co-receptors for canonical Wnt signaling, was downregulated in DC iAT2 cells (Figure 3E). Also, GSEA found genes with TCF7 targets in their promoters are downregulated in DC iAT2 cells at D70 (Figure 3F). IPA of master regulators at D70 revealed a decrease in genes controlled by lithium chloride (which can potentiate Wnt signaling by inhibiting GSK3) and TCF7 along with an upregulation of genes usually stimulated by Wnt pathway inhibitors (Figure 3G). GSEA also revealed a significant downregulation of targets of miR34a, a miRNA that we previously demonstrated negatively regulates many components of the Wnt pathway in response to uncapped telomeres (Figure 3H; Yang et al., 2017). The genes encoding four of the six shelterins, proteins that bind and help maintain normal telomere function, are direct targets of the canonical Wnt transcriptional effector β-catenin, and two of these, TINF2 and POT1, were downregulated in D70 DC iAT2 cells, which may contribute to telomere uncapping beyond simple telomere shortening (Figure 3I; Yang et al., 2017). These genes were confirmed to be downregulated by ddPCR, and furthermore, DC iAT2 cells expressed lower levels of both TERT and TERC (Figure 3—figure supplement 1). These data indicate that Wnt signaling in AT2 cells is greatly affected by shortened telomeres and that non-canonical Wnt signaling may be elevated while canonical (β-catenin-dependent) signaling may be diminished.

Figure 3 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
RNA-seq of passaged induced pluripotent stem cell-derived type II alveolar epithelial (iAT2) cells reveals a time dependent change in Wnt signaling.

(A) A schematic to show how cells were prepared for RNA-seq. (B) Volcano plots at D28, D50, and D70 show how the number of differentially expressed genes increases at D70. (C) Gene set enrichment analyses (GSEA) at D70 comparing DKC1 A386T iAT2 cells reveal an upregulation of non-canonical Wnt signaling and the planar cell polarity (PCP) pathway. (D) RNA-seq analysis shows upregulation of WNT5A and WNT11, non-canonical WNTs associated with pulmonary fibrosis (* p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001, **** p<0.0001, DEseq2 pairwise contrast statistics). (E) RNA-seq analysis shows broad downregulation of many FZD receptors (* p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001, **** p<0.0001, DEseq2 pairwise contrast statistics). (F) GSEA at D70 comparing DKC1 A386T iAT2 cells reveals a downregulation of genes with TCF7 bindings sites in their promoters. (G) Ingenuity pathway analysis reveals master regulators at D70 including downregulation of regulation associated with lithium chloride and TCF7, and upregulation of regulation associated with multiple Wnt inhibitors. (H) GSEA at D70 comparing DKC1 A386T iAT2 cells reveals a downregulation of genes with miR34A binding sites. TINF2 and POT1 are downregulated in DKC1 A386T iAT2 cells at D70 (* p<0.05, ** p<0.01).

GSK3 inhibitors rescue the growth of DC iAT2 alveolospheres

Given our previous work showing that GSK3 inhibition reverses telomere dysfunction and associated defects in intestinal models of DC (Woo et al., 2016; Yang et al., 2017), we attempted to rescue the DC iAT2 alveolosphere formation defect by treatment with CHIR99021, a well-characterized GSK3 inhibitor, which thus stabilizes β-catenin and upregulates canonical Wnt target genes (Figure 4A). CHIR99021 partially rescued the alveolosphere growth defect of iAT2 cells in a dose dependent fashion (Figure 4B–C). Furthermore, if alveolospheres were cultured continuously prior to D70 with CHIR99021, this prevented the growth defect from emerging (Figure 4—figure supplement 1A-B). We also tested another GSK3 inhibitor, CHIR98014, which similarly rescued growth of the mutant iAT2 cells (Figure 4—figure supplement 2A-B). These findings suggest that GSK3 inhibition rescued the growth of DC iAT2 alveolospheres.

Figure 4 with 3 supplements see all
Download asset Open asset
CHIR99021 rescues growth and telomere defects in dyskeratosis congentia (DC) induced pluripotent stem cell-derived type II alveolar epithelial (iAT2) cell alveolospheres.

(A) Differentiation protocol used to test how CHIR99021 affects growth of DC iAT2s. (B) Representative images of differentiating wild type (WT) and DKC1 A386T mutant bearing cells with increasing amounts of CHIR99021 (scale bars, 1 mm for all alveolosphere images). (C) Quantifications of alveolosphere formation efficiency after treatment with differing concentrations of CHIR99021 (n = 4, * p<0.05, **** p<0.0001, Student’s t-test). (D) When D70 alveolospheres are cultured with 3 µM CHIR99021, DKC1 A386T mutant iAT2 cells have a lower fraction of cells with 53 BP1 foci. Note, data for no CHIR99021 bars are from Figure 2 (n = 3, * p<0.05, Student’s t-test; scale bars, 10 µm). (E) When D70 alveolospheres are cultured with 3 µM CHIR99021, DKC1 A386T mutant iAT2 cells have a lower fraction of p21 positive cells. Note, data for no CHIR99021 bars are from Figure 2 (n = 3, * p<0.05, Student’s t-test; scale bars, 10 µm). (F) When D70 alveolospheres are cultured with 3 µM CHIR99021, DKC1 A386T mutant iAT2 cells have a lower fraction of telomere dysfunction induced foci (TIF) positive cells. Note, data for no CHIR99021 bars are from Figure 2 (n = 3, * p<0.05, Student’s t-test; scale bars, 10 µm; insets highlight cells with TIFs, each one noted by the white arrowheads). (G) Telomeric repeat amplification protocol assay for telomerase activity in iAT2 cells using fivefold extract dilutions (n = 3).

Figure 4—source data 1

Source data for Figure 4C-G.

Figure 4C-SourceData-OrganoidFormationEfficiency.pzfx – Raw counts of organoid counts normalized to number of cells input to calculate formation efficiency along with statistical tests. Figure 4D-SourceData-53BP1Rescue.pzfx – Raw counts of 53BP1 positive cells after treatment with CHIR99021 along with statistics. Figure 4E-SourceData-p21Rescue.pzfx – Raw counts of p21 positive cells after treatment with CHIR99021 along with statistics. Figure 4F-SourceData-TIFRescue.pzfx – Raw counts of telomere dysfunction induced foci positive cells after treatment with CHIR99021 along with statistics.Figure 4G-SourceData-2021-05-04-109-CK-Cropped.tiff – Raw blot of telomeric repeat amplification protocol (TRAP) assay of iPSC-derived type II alveolar epithelial (iAT2) cells treated with CHIR99021 showing area that was cropped. Figure 4G-SourceData-2021-05-04-109-CK.tif – Raw blot of TRAP assay of iAT2 cells treated with CHIR99021. Figure 4G-SourceData-2021-05-04-109-K-Cropped.tiff – Raw blot of TRAP assay of untreated iAT2 showing area that was cropped. Figure 4G-SourceData-2021-05-04-109-K.tif – Raw blot of TRAP assay of untreated iAT2. Figure 4G-SourceData-2021-05-04-109-QuantificationTRAP.xlsx – Quantifications of TRAP assay in Figure 4G.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/64430/elife-64430-fig4-data1-v2.zip

CHIR99021 downregulates senescence markers and resolves TIFs in DC iAT2 alveolospheres

We ultimately investigated how CHIR99021 affects the telomere status of DC iAT2s. CHIR treated iAT2 cells showed fewer cells with 53BP1 foci, fewer p21+ cells, and fewer TIF+ cells (Figure 4D–F). TeSLA revealed a modest increase in average telomere length but no apparent decrease in the frequency of shortest detectable telomeres (Figure 4—figure supplement 3A-C). iAT2 cell telomerase activity was restored in mutant cells treated with CHIR99021 to levels similar to those seen in WT cells (Figure 4G). Together, these data argue that GSK3 inhibition not only rescues the growth of DC iAT2 cells, but it also rescues telomere defects, most likely through upregulation of telomerase activity that could extend telomeres that are shorter than those that can be detected by TeSLA; it is also possible that telomerase is contributing to telomere capping via lengthening-independent mechanisms (Perera et al., 2019). Of note, withdrawal of CHIR99021 during only 14 days prior to D70 was sufficient to elicit the growth defect (Figure 4—figure supplement 1A-B), consistent with an only modest increase in telomere length associated with the increased telomerase activity.

Discussion

We used isogenic human iPS cell lines to generate DC mutant iAT2 cells with shortened telomeres to interrogate how telomere dysfunction can affect AT2 cell function. We found that shortened and uncapped telomeres are associated with a defect in alveolosphere formation by iAT2 cells. This defect is characterized by senescent iAT2 cells that upregulate many pathways associated with PF including the UPR, mitochondrial biogenesis and function, thyroid hormone signaling, and p53 signaling. DC mutant iAT2 cells also suppress canonical Wnt signaling, and consistent with this, GSK3 inhibition rescues telomerase activity, telomere capping, and alveolosphere formation. This system provides a new preclinical model to better understand PF pathogenesis and how potential new PF therapeutics affect AT2 cell function in the context of telomere dysfunction.

Wnt signaling is complex and can be broken down into two major categories: β-catenin dependent (canonical) signaling and β-catenin independent (non-canonical) signaling. These distinctions can also be blurred as evidenced by studies that show how non-canonical ligands, such as WNT5A, can activate both arms of Wnt signaling (van Amerongen et al., 2012; Mikels and Nusse, 2006). These complexities therefore make the conflicting reports about whether β-catenin dependent Wnt signaling is of benefit (Tanjore et al., 2013) or of harm in PF (Douglas et al., 2006; Henderson et al., 2010; Kim et al., 2011; Königshoff et al., 2008; McDonough et al., 2019) unsurprising. Given the heterogeneity of the disease both in space and time and the context dependence of Wnt signaling, these studies can often only capture a snapshot of the fibrotic response. Furthermore, there are clear differences between mice and humans with regard to telomere and lung biology (Basil and Morrisey, 2020; Gomes et al., 2011). These limitations highlight the need for human models capable of assessing the spatial, temporal, and cell type specific properties of Wnt signaling in PF pathogenesis.

Our study also provides evidence of upregulation of β-catenin-independent signaling in DC iAT2 cells and that re-activating β-catenin dependent Wnt signaling using GSK3 inhibitors might provide support for AT2 cell proliferation in the context of telomere dysfunction. It is tempting to extrapolate from other models of lung disease to understand how the activity of the β-catenin dependent Wnt pathway might be of benefit in PF. β-catenin dependent Wnt signaling improved regeneration and survival in a model of emphysema (Kneidinger et al., 2011), and inhibition of WNT5A, and thus presumably some component of β-catenin independent Wnt signaling, improved repair in a model of COPD (Baarsma et al., 2017). Our work, consistent with previous studies, argues that β-catenin dependent Wnt signaling supports AT2 cell telomere capping and proliferation, which may be of benefit during regeneration and repair (Nabhan et al., 2018; Uhl et al., 2015; Zacharias et al., 2018).

Our previous work uncovered a positive feedback loop between Wnt signaling and telomeres in the intestine (Woo et al., 2016; Yang et al., 2017). Here, we show that aspects of the Wnt-telomere feedback loop appear to be at play in AT2 cells (Fernandez and Johnson, 2018), arguing that this connection between Wnt and telomeres is present not just in proliferative tissues such as the intestine, but also in lung cells, which are normally quiescent but proliferate in response to injury. Previous work highlighted the importance of telomerase during alveolar regeneration (Driscoll et al., 2000; Lee et al., 2009). Furthermore, given previous demonstrations that Wnt can stimulate, directly or indirectly, TERT and TERC expression as well as telomerase activity in several cell types (Baena-Del Valle et al., 2018; Hoffmeyer et al., 2012; Jaitner et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2012), we anticipated and were able to demonstrate (i) that TERT and TERC transcripts are reduced in senescent iAT2 cells and (ii) that GSK3 inhibition can restore telomerase activity in this context. Of note, CHIR99021 is known to induce proliferation in a wide variety of cell types (Hesselbarth et al., 2021; Jacob et al., 2017), which likely contributes to the growth stimulation observed in both WT and DKC1 mutant iAT2s shown in Figure 4—figure supplement 1. This raises the possibility that GSK3 inhibition has additional effects independent of telomeres. We also note that the effects of CHIR99021 could differ in some ways from canonical Wnt signaling, by impacting targets other than GSK3 or by differentially affecting the numerous pathways that are downstream of GSK3. However, the Wnt-related transcriptional changes in the mutant iAT2s, the high selectivity of CHIR99021 for GSK3 and its common use as a replacement for Wnt ligands in cell culture differentiation protocols, along with the fact that two different GSK3 inhibitors rescued growth of the mutant iAT2s suggest that the rescue provided by CHIR99021 is indeed related to GSK3 and Wnt (An et al., 2012; Loh et al., 2016; Pagliuca et al., 2014; Rezania et al., 2014; Ring et al., 2003; Teo et al., 2014).

DKC1 mutant iAT2 cells displayed a senescent phenotype that included upregulation of the p21 cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor. Recent observations have revealed similar p21 upregulation in the AT2 cells of human PF lungs and have also demonstrated a causal role for p21 in driving experimental PF in mice (Lee et al., 2021; Lv et al., 2022). Senescence of the mutant iAT2 cells manifested only after serial passaging and telomere shortening, demonstrating that the senescence is not a direct result of DKC1 mutation per se. The senescence-associated growth defect emerged gradually, becoming more pronounced at later passages. Similarly gradual onset of telomere-driven senescence has been observed in other settings and has been attributed to (i) the stochastic nature of telomere shortening (causing some cells in a population to senesce prior to others) and (ii) graded increases in DNA damage responses in proportion to the extent of telomere shortening (Cesare et al., 2009; Cesare et al., 2013; Kaul et al., 2011; Martin-Ruiz et al., 2004; Ruis and Boulton, 2021; Suram and Herbig, 2014; Van Ly et al., 2018).

This Wnt-telomere feedback loop might not be the only regulatory loop at play in AT2 cells. Indeed, we hypothesize that telomeres might be an integrator and amplifier of multiple cellular stress responses. For example, our evidence of upregulation of mitochondrial processes in DC iAT2 cells is consistent with established feedback loops between telomeres and mitochondria: telomere dysfunction can drive mitochondrial dysfunction (Sahin et al., 2011) and mitochondrial dysfunction can drive telomere dysfunction (Guha et al., 2018; Passos et al., 2007; Qian et al., 2019). Furthermore, our finding of the upregulation of genes associated with the UPR is consistent with reports linking cellular senescence and the UPR (Pluquet et al., 2015). We hypothesize that the UPR might in turn drive telomere dysfunction, and it would thus be of interest to investigate telomere status in familial PF driven by misfolded proteins (Katzen and Beers, 2020). These multiple integrated loops might help explain how these various vital cellular processes combine to cause dysfunction in AT2 cells in PF.

Recent work, using mouse AT2 cell organoids, has elucidated a developmental trajectory by which AT2 cells can differentiate via an intermediate state into type I alveolar epithelial (AT1) cells in response to bleomycin injury (Choi et al., 2020; Kobayashi et al., 2020; Strunz et al., 2020). Of note, the intermediate cells are characterized by high levels of p53 signaling and DNA damage which resolve with their final transition to an AT1 cell fate (Kobayashi et al., 2020), arguing that repairing DNA damage, potentially at telomeres, is an important step in the transition to an AT1 cell. Furthermore, many of the pathways that promote the differentiation of AT2 cells into AT1 cells are downregulated in DC iAT2 cells, including those involving IL1β, glycolysis, and HIF1α (Choi et al., 2020). We speculate that DC AT2 cells with short uncapped telomeres may have trouble suppressing DNA damage at telomeres as they differentiate into AT1 cells. This may lock these cells into the transition state and may help explain their persistence in PF lungs. These persistent transitioning AT2 cells may thereby contribute to fibrosis. Testing this idea in the human iPSC-derived alveolosphere model will require technical advances to enable the generation of AT1 cells. Regardless, our DC iAT2 cell model recapitulates many hallmarks of PF AT2 cells and offers a new system to probe the underlying biology of PF.

Materials and methods

See Appendix 1 for Key Resources Table.

iPSC line generation and maintenance

Request a detailed protocol

The BU3 NGST line was a generous gift from Dr. Darrell Kotton at Boston University. iPS cells used for differentiation were maintained on growth factor reduced Matrigel (Corning) coated plates in StemMACS iPS-Brew XF medium (Miltenyi Biotec). Cells were cultured in clusters and passaged every 4–5 days using StemMACS Dissociation reagent (Miltenyi Biotec). All iPS lines were genotyped using an RFLP at the relevant important loci, and the sequence was confirmed by Sanger sequencing. All cells were routinely screened for mycoplasma contamination using a PCR-based assay (Uphoff and Drexler, 2014).

CRISPR editing for generating paired DKC1 mutant cell lines in BU3 NGST

Request a detailed protocol

To generate the introduced BU3 NGST line harboring the DKC1 mutation, we used the CRISPR track on the UCSC genome browser to select candidate guideRNAs (gRNAs) that targeted as close to the individual mutation as possible, had easily mutable PAM sites and would introduce a new restriction site to make screening easier (see the Key Resources Table for exact sequences and Figure S1 for details). gRNAs were ordered as oligos from IDT and cloned into pX458, a gift from Dr. Feng Zhang’s lab (Addgene # 48138). The candidate guides were tested for cutting efficiency by transfecting them into HEK293T cells and assaying cutting efficiency using T7E1 digestion of the PCR amplified locus. The most efficient guides were chosen and ssODN HDR templates were designed to eliminate the PAM. iPS cells were then nucleofected with the Amaxa Nucleofection system using the following program (P3, CA-137) (Lonza). The cells were allowed to recover for 36–48 hr at high density in the presence of ROCK inhibitor and then isolated by FACS for GFPhi cells. They were plated at low density (2500 cells/10 cm plate) and allowed to form single colonies. After 7–10 days, individual clones were selected and transferred to 96 well plates and screened for introduction of the restriction site for each mutation. Restriction enzyme positive clones were expanded and then subjected to sanger sequencing for identification of correctly edited clones. Successfully edited clones were checked for normal karyotype by G-banding (Cell Line Genetics), mycoplasma contamination, and pluripotency marker expression by immunofluorescence and were subsequently passaged for at least five passages before being re-genotyped to ensure that the clones were not mixed. During differentiations, all iAT2 cells were genotyped by restriction digest to ensure that the mutation was not lost with passage.

Directed differentiation into NKX2.1+ lung progenitors and SFTPC+ iPS-derived AT2 cells

Request a detailed protocol

A modified version of the protocol described in Jacob et al., 2017 was used to generate SFTPC expressing iAT2 cells. In brief, iPS cells were seeded at 500,000 cells per well on a six-well plate with ROCK inhibitor for 24 hr and incubated at 5% O2 | 5% CO2 | 90% N2. Definitive endoderm was induced using the StemDiff Definitive Endoderm kit for 3 days. Next, the cells were split at a ratio of 1:3 onto fresh Matrigel plates and anteriorized using dorsomorphin (2 µM) and SB431542 (10 µM) in complete serum-free differentiation media (cSFDM) for 3 days. Cells were then differentiated into NKX2.1+ progenitors by incubating in CBRa media (cSFDM containing CHIR99021 [3 µM], BMP4 [10 ng/mL], and retinoic acid [100 nM]) for 7 days changing media every 2 days at first and then increasing to every day media changes when the media became more acidic. On day 15 or 16, NKX2.1+ progenitors were isolated using a FACSJazz sorter using the endogenous NKX2.1::GFP reporter.

NKX2.1+ sorted cells were re-plated at a density of 400,000 cells/mL in 90% Matrigel supplemented with 10% of CK + DCI + TZV media (cSFDM containing 3 µM CHIR99021, 10 ng/mL KGF, 100 nM dexamethasone, 100 µM 8Br-cAMP and 100 µM IBMX, and 2 µM TZV) (from now on referred to as 90/10 Matrigel). The Matrigel droplets were allowed to cure at 37°C for 20–30 min and then overlaid with an appropriate amount of CK + DCI + TZV media. These alveolosphere containing Matrigel droplets were incubated at 37°C at 20% O2 | 5% CO2 | 75% N2 (room air) for 14 days changing with fresh media every other day. Per Hurely et al., CHIR99021 was withdrawn from the media on day 17 for 4 days and re-added back on day 21 to optimize generation and specification of SFTPC+ cells. On day 28, the iAT2 containing alveolospheres were sorted on a FACSJazz sorter for SFTPC+ cells using the endogenous SFTPC::TdTomato reporter. These sorted SFTPC+ cells were replated at a concentration of 65,000 cells/mL in 90/10 Matrigel drops and grown in K + DCI + TZV at 37°C in an ambient air incubator supplemented to 5% CO2 for 3 weeks changing media every other day.

Alveolosphere counting and formation efficiency calculations

Request a detailed protocol

Alveolosphere images were taken on a Leica Thunder widefield microscope using a 1.25× objective. Z-stacks were maximum projected and then thresholded using ImageJ to create a binary file. Binary files were eroded and dilated to ensure maximum determination of the alveolosphere size. Finally, the binary images were separated by watershedding, and alveolospheres were counted using Analyze Particles in ImageJ.

Immunofluorescence microscopy of iAT2 alveolospheres

Request a detailed protocol

Alveolospheres were washed with PBS and then fixed in place using 2% paraformaldehyde (PFA) at room temperature for 30 min and then dehydrated and paraffin embedded and sectioned. Once cut, slides were de-paraffinized, rehydrated, permeabilized, and antigens were retrieved by steaming for 15 min in a citrate buffer (Vector Labs). After blocking, each slide was incubated with a primary antibody using the concentrations listed in the Key Resource Table. Slides were incubated with primary antibody at 37°C for 2 hr. After washing, slides were incubated with appropriate fluorochrome conjugated secondary antibodies (see Key Resources Table for antibody details). Slides were then washed, counterstained with DAPI, and mounted. Images were acquired using a Leica Thunder widefield microscope.

TIFs were stained as described in Suram et al., 2012. In brief, cut slides were de-paraffinized, rehydrated, permeabilized, and antigens were retrieved as for other immunofluoresence stains. Slides were blocked and stained for 53BP1 and then stained with an appropriate fluorochrome conjugated secondary antibody. Slides were then re-fixed with PFA, quenched with glycine, re-dehydrated in an ethanol series, and air dried. The slides were then stained with the PNA probe. The slides were washed, rehydrated in an ethanol series, and stained with a tertiary fluorochrome conjugated antibody. Slides were then washed, counterstained with DAPI, and mounted. TIF images were acquired using a Leica SP8 confocal microscope. Quantification of nuclei was carried out in ImageJ in a blinded fashion.

Measurement of telomerase activity with TRAP

Request a detailed protocol

iPS cells or iAT2 cells were cultured as indicated in each figure legend. 100,000 cells were harvested using methods described and lysed using NP-40 lysis buffer and processed as described in Herbert et al., 2006. In brief, lysates were incubated with a telomerase substrate and incubated at 30°C for telomerase to add telomere repeats. The reactions were then PCR amplified. Telomere repeats were resolved on a 4–20% TBE polyacrylamide gel and visualized by staining with SYBR Green nucleic acid gel stain. Relative telomerase activity was quantified using ImageJ focusing on the first six amplicons averaged across the dilutions.

Measurement of telomere lengths by TRF and TeSLA

Request a detailed protocol

Telomere lengths were measured as described in Lai et al., 2016; Lai et al., 2017. DNA was isolated from cells using a Gentra Puregene kit (Qiagen). DNA was quantified by fluorometry using Qubit 2.0 (Invitrogen). For terminal restriction fragment (TRF) analysis in brief, 500 ng of DNA was digested with CviAII overnight followed by digestion with a mixture of BfaI, MseI, and NdeI overnight. For TeSLA in brief, 50 ng of DNA was ligated to telorette adapters, then digested with CviAII, then digested with a combination of BfaI, MseI, and NdeI, dephosphorylated, and TeSLA adapters (AT/TA Adapters) were ligated on. These TeSLA libraries were PCR amplified using Lucigen’s FailSafe polymerase kit with Pre-Mix H.

Southern blotting was carried out using previously established protocols with some modification (Kimura et al., 2010; Lai et al., 2017). TRFs and TeSLA PCR reactions were separated on a 0.7% agarose gel at 0.833 V/cm for 24 hr. The gel was depurinated and denatured and then transferred to a Hybond XL membrane (Cytiva) by capillary transfer using denaturation buffer. The Hybond membrane was hybridized using a DIG-labeled telomere probe overnight. The blot was then washed and exposed using CDP-Star on an LAS-4000 Image Quant imager (Cytiva). TRFs were analyzed using ImageQuant while TeSLAs were analyzed using the MatLab software developed previously (Lai et al., 2017).

Measurement of telomere lengths by qPCR

Request a detailed protocol

Average telomere length was measured by qPCR as described in Cawthon, 2002; Joglekar et al., 2020 with some modifications. In brief, isolated genomic DNA was quantified by Qubit fluorometry (Invitrogen) and diluted to within the range of a standard curve constructed from a mixture of all samples analyzed. Triplicate qPCR reactions of the telomeric (T) product and the single copy gene (S) (HBB) were amplified using a Roche LightCycler 480 II (Roche) using the following programs: T PCR program 95°C for 10 min, 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, 56°C for 1 min; S PCR program 95°C for 10 min, 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, 58°C for 1 min. Cq values were computed using the second derivative method, and T/S ratios were calculated using the 2-∆∆Ct method.

RNA-sequencing and data analysis

Request a detailed protocol

SFTPC + sorted cells from the indicated times during, counted and harvested in TRIzol and stored at –80°C until further processing. The RNA was isolated using a Direct-Zol kit (Zymo Research). RNA concentration was obtained by Qubit fluorometry (Invitrogen), and the integrity was checked by tape station analysis (Agilent Technologies). All samples had RINs >8, and the libraries were prepared by poly-A selection and sequenced by GeneWiz, LLC.

RNA sequencing libraries were prepared using the NEBNext Ultra RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina following manufacturer’s instructions (NEB). Briefly, mRNAs were first enriched with oligo (dT) beads. Enriched mRNAs were fragmented for 15 min at 94°C. First strand and second strand cDNAs were subsequently synthesized. cDNA fragments were end repaired and adenylated at 3’ ends, and universal adapters were ligated to cDNA fragments, followed by index addition and library enrichment by limited-cycle PCR. The sequencing libraries were validated on the Agilent TapeStation (Agilent Technologies) and quantified using a Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer (Invitrogen) as well as by quantitative PCR (KAPA Biosystems).

The sequencing libraries were pooled and clustered on one lane of a flowcell. After clustering, the flowcell was loaded on the Illumina HiSeq instrument (4000 or equivalent) according to manufacturer’s instructions. The samples were sequenced using a 2 × 150 bp paired end configuration. Image analysis and base calling were conducted by the HiSeq control software. Raw sequence data (.bcl files) generated from Illumina HiSeq was converted into fastq files and de-multiplexed using Illumina’s bcl2fastq 2.17 software. One mismatch was allowed for index sequence identification.

Fastq files were checked for quality using FastQC. Raw sequence files (fastq) for 22 samples were mapped using salmon (https://combine-lab.github.io/salmon/; Patro et al., 2017) against the human transcripts described in Gencode (version v33, built on the human genome GRCm38, https://www.gencodegenes.org), with a 70.5% average mapping rate yielding 30.4 M average total input reads per sample. Transcript counts were summarized to the gene level using tximport (available here) and normalized and tested for differential expression using DESeq2 (available here). Subsets of time-matched samples were used to compute pair-wise contrast statistics for mutant vs WT at each time. Raw FASTQ files and analyzed counts are available on GEO under the accession number GSE160871.

GSEA (Subramanian et al., 2005) was carried out in R (v4.0.2) (R Development Core Team, 2020) using RStudio (v1.3.1056) (RStudio Team, 2020), the tidyverse (v1.3.0) (Wickham et al., 2019), and the readxl package (v1.3.1) (Hadley Wickham, 2019). GSEA was run for contrasts of interest in preranked mode using the DESeq2 statistic as the ranking metric (Love et al., 2014). Annotated molecular signatures from the Hallmark Collection (H), Curated Collection (C2), and Regulatory Target Molecular Collection (C3) maintained by the Molecular Signatures Database were accessed in RStudio using the msigdbr package (v7.1.1) (Dolgalev, 2020; Liberzon et al., 2011; Liberzon et al., 2015). The clusterProfiler package (v3.17.1) was used to perform GSEA on the unfiltered, sorted gene lists (Yu et al., 2012). GSEA results were viewed using the DT package (v0.15) (Yihui Xie, 2020). GSEA plots were generated using the enrichplot package (v1.9.1) (Yu, 2020).

Genes that differed in expression >twofold and were associated with an adjusted p-value <0.05 from the D70 time point were also analyzed through the use of IPA (Ingenuity Systems, https://www.ingenuity.com) (Krämer et al., 2014) through the University of Pennsylvania Molecular Profiling Facility.

ddPCR

Request a detailed protocol

RNA was isolated as listed above for the RNA-sequencing. 140 ng of RNA was first treated with ezDNAse (Invitrogen) and converted to cDNA using the SuperScript IV First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen). The equivalent of 12.5 ng of original RNA was used as template in the reactions, and the ddPCR assays as well as the ddPCR supermix used are listed in the Key Resources Table (Bio-Rad). ddPCR was performed according to manufacturer’s instructions using QX200 AutoDG Droplet Digital PCR System (Bio-Rad). Results were analyzed using Quanta-Soft Version 1.7.4.0917 (Bio-Rad). Copies/µL were used and normalized to ACTB.

Statistical methods

Request a detailed protocol

Statistical methods are outlined in each of the figure legends. Each replicate ‘n’ represents an entirely separate differentiation from the pluripotent stem cell stage. For experiments with iPS cells, ‘n’ represents separate wells of the same iPS line (specifically for Figure S1 and S2). Quantitative data is represented as the mean with error bars representing the standard error of the mean. Student’s t-tests (unpaired and two-tailed) were used for determining statistical significance for all comparisons unless otherwise noted.

Appendix 1

Key resources table

Appendix 1—key resources table
Reagent type (species) or resourceDesignationSource or referenceIdentifiersAdditional information
Cell line (Homo sapiens)BU3 NGSTJacob et al., 2017iPS cell line
Cell line (Homo sapiens)BU3 NGST – WTThis PaperiPS cell line, WT control passaged with the DKC1 A386T cell line. See Figure 1—figure supplement 1 & 2 for more details. Contact the corresponding authors for the cell line.
Cell line (Homo sapiens)BU3 NGST - DKC1 A386TThis PaperiPS cell line, DKC1 A386T passaged with the WT cell line. See Figure 1—figure supplement 1 & 2 for more details. Contact the corresponding authors for the cell line.
Cell line (Homo sapiens)AG04646Woo et al., 2016iPS cell line
Recombinant DNA reagentpX458Feng ZhangAddgene # 48,138
Chemical compound, drugThiazovivin (TZV)Cayman Chemical compound, drugCAT# 14,245
Chemical compound, drugSB431542Cayman Chemical compound, drugCAT# 13,031
Chemical compound, drugDorsomorphinCayman Chemical compound, drugCAT# 21,207
Chemical compound, drugCHIR99021Cayman Chemical compound, drugCAT# 13,122
Chemical compound, drugCHIR98014Cayman Chemical compound, drugCAT# 15,578
Chemical compound, drugRetinoic AcidSigmaCAT# R2625-50MG
Peptide, recombinant proteinrhBMP4R&D SystemsCAT# 314 BP-050
Peptide, recombinant proteinrhKGFR&D SystemsCAT# 251 KG-050
Chemical compound, drugDexamethasoneSigmaCAT# D4902-100MG
Chemical compound, drug8Br-cAMPSigmaCAT# 7880–250 MG
Chemical compound, drugIBMXSigmaCAT# I5879-250MG
Peptide, recombinant proteinDNaseIRocheCAT# 4716728001
Chemical compound, drug7-AADBD BiosciencesCAT# 51-68981E
Chemical compound, drugPropidium IodideBD BiosciencesCAT# 556,463
Peptide, recombinant proteinDispase IIGibcoCAT# 17105041
Chemical compound, drugSYBR Green I Nucleic Acid Gel StainInvitrogenCAT# S7563
Peptide, recombinant proteinMatrigel, Growth Factor ReducedCorningCAT# 354,230
Chemical compound, drugStem MACS iPS-Brew XFMiltenyi BiotecCAT# 130-104-368
Peptide, recombinant proteinAccutaseInnovative Cell TechnologiesCAT# AT104-500
Commercial assay, kitP3 Primary Cell 4D-NucleofectorTM X Kit LLonzaCAT# V4XP-3012
Chemical compound, drugIMDMCorning/MediatechCAT# MT10-016-CV
Chemical compound, drugHam’s F12 Nutrient MixCorning/MediatechCAT# MT10-080-CV
Chemical compound, drugB27GibcoCAT# 17504044
Chemical compound, drugN2GibcoCAT# 17502048
Chemical compound, drugBSA Fraction VGibcoCAT# 15260037
Chemical compound, drugMonothioglycerolSigmaCAT# M6145-25ML
Chemical compound, drugGlutaMAXGibcoCAT# 35050061
Chemical compound, drugAscorbic AcidSigmaCAT# A4544-25G
Chemical compound, drugPrimocinInvivogenCAT# ANT-PM-2
Chemical compound, drugHank’s Balanced Salt SolutionGibcoCAT# 14175079
Chemical compound, drugHEPESGibcoCAT# 15630080
Chemical compound, drugEDTAGibcoCAT# 15575039
Peptide, recombinant protein0.05% trypsin-EDTAGibcoCAT# 25300054
Commercial assay, kitDirect-zol RNA Micro KitZymoCAT# R2061
Commercial assay, kitGentra Puregene Cell KitQiagenCAT# 158,745
AntibodyAnti-NANOG (Rabbit polyclonal)Reprocell/StemgentCAT# 09–0020IF (1:100 37°C for 2 hr)
AntibodyAnti-53BP1 (Rabbit monoclonal)NovusCAT# NB100-304IF (1:100 37°C for 2 hr)
AntibodyAnti-P21 (Mouse monoclonal)Santa CruzCAT# sc-6246IF (1:50 37°C for 2 hr)
AntibodyAnti-Cleaved Caspase 3 (CC3) (Rabbit monoclonal)Cell Signaling TechnologiesCAT# 9,664IF (1:2000 37°C for 2 hr)
Sequence-based reagentAnti-Cy3-Telo-C ProbePNA BioCAT# F1002Anti-telomeric
AntibodyAnti-Digoxigenin-AP, Fab fragmentsRocheCAT# 11093274910
AntibodyGoat anti-Rabbit IgG Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor 647 (Donkey polyclonal)InvitrogenCAT# A-21244IF (1:250 RT for 1 hr)
AntibodyDonkey anti-Mouse IgG Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor 647 (Donkey polyclonal)InvitrogenCAT# A-31571IF (1:250 RT for 1 hr)
AntibodyDonkey anti-Goat IgG Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor 647 (Donkey polyclonal)InvitrogenCAT# A-21447IF(1:250 RT for 1 hr)
Chemical compound, drugTriZOLInvitrogenCAT# 15596018
Peptide, recombinant proteinFailSafe Polymerase Enzyme MixLucigenCAT# FS9901K
Chemical compound, drugFailSafe Buffer HLucigenCAT# FSP995H-INCL
Peptide, recombinant proteinCviAIINEBCAT# R0640L
Peptide, recombinant proteinBfaINEBCAT# R0568L
Peptide, recombinant proteinMseINEBCAT# R0525L
Peptide, recombinant proteinNdeINEBCAT# R0111L
Peptide, recombinant proteinrSAPNEBCAT# M0371L
Chemical compound, drugCDP-StarRocheCAT# 11759051001
Chemical compound, drugDIG-11-dUTPRocheCAT# 11558706910
Chemical compound, drugDIG Easy Hybridization GranulesRocheCAT# 11796895001
Chemical compound, drugBlocking ReagentRocheCAT# 11096176001
Sequence-based reagentDIG Labeld DNA Molecular Weight Marker IIRocheCAT# 11218590910
Chemical compound, drugHybond-XLCytiva/AmershamCAT# RPN303S
Peptide, recombinant proteinKlenow FragmentNEBCAT# M0212S
Peptide, recombinant proteinLambda ExonucleaseNEBCAT# M0262S
Peptide, recombinant proteinGo-TAQ FlexiPromegaCAT# M8298
Peptide, recombinant proteinddPCR Multiplex SupermixBioRadCAT# 12005909
SoftwareFIJINIHRRID:SCR_002285https://imagej.net/Fiji
SoftwareSalmonPatro et al., 2017
SoftwareIngenuity pathway analysisKrämer et al., 2014
SoftwareFlowJoBD BiosciencesRRID:SCR_008520
SoftwareImageQuant TL 8.2CytivaRRID:SCR_018374
SoftwareTeSLAQuantLai et al., 2017

Appendix 2

Primer Sequences

Reagent type (species) or resourceDesignationSource or referenceIdentifiersAdditional information
Sequence-based reagentgRNA-DKC1A386-5-FThis PapergRNA Cloning Primers designed to target DKC1 A386 – See Figure 1—figure supplement 1 for detailsCAC CGC TTC TTC TGA CTT GCC TGG
Sequence-based reagentgRNA-DKC1A386-5-RThis PapergRNA Cloning Primers designed to target DKC1 A386 – See Figure 1—figure supplement 1 for detailsAAA CCC AGG CAA GTC AGA AGA AGC
Sequence-based reagentDKC1-Geno-FWoo et al., 2016Genotyping primers for DKC1 GeneAAA AGT AGA GTG GCT GCG GT
Sequence-based reagentDKC1-Geno-RWoo et al., 2016Genotyping primers for DKC1 GeneACA ACC TCC ATG CTC ACC TG
Sequence-based reagentTeSLA-T1Lai et al., 2017TeloretteACT GGC CAC GTG TTT TGA TCG ACC CTA AC
Sequence-based reagentTeSLA-T2Lai et al., 2017TeloretteACT GGC CAC GTG TTT TGA TCG ATA ACC CT
Sequence-based reagentTeSLA-T3Lai et al., 2017TeloretteACT GGC CAC GTG TTT TGA TCG ACC TAA CC
Sequence-based reagentTeSLA-T4Lai et al., 2017TeloretteACT GGC CAC GTG TTT TGA TCG ACT AAC CC
Sequence-based reagentTeSLA-T5Lai et al., 2017TeloretteACT GGC CAC GTG TTT TGA TCG AAA CCC TA
Sequence-based reagentTeSLA-T6Lai et al., 2017TeloretteACT GGC CAC GTG TTT TGA TCG AAC CCT AA
Sequence-based reagentTeSLA Adapter ShortLai et al., 2017GGT TAC TTT GTA AGC CTG TC[SpcC3]
Sequence-based reagentTeSLA Adapter TALai et al., 2017[Phos] TAG ACA GGC TTA CAA AGT AAC CAT GGT GGA GAA TTC TGT CGT CTT CAC GCT ACA TT [SpcC3]
Sequence-based reagentTeSLA Adapter ATLai et al., 2017[Phos] ATG ACA GGC TTA CAA AGT AAC CAT GGT GGA GAA TTC TGT CGT CTT CAC GCT ACA TT [SpcC3]
Sequence-based reagentAPLai et al., 2017TGT AGC GTG AAG ACG ACA GAA
Sequence-based reagentTeSLA-TPLai et al., 2017TGG CCA CGT GTT TTG ATC GA
Sequence-based reagentG-Rich ONTLai et al., 2016[Phos] CCC TAA CCC TAA CCC TAA CCC TAA CCC TAA CCC TAA CCC TAG ATA GTT GAG AGT C
Sequence-based reagentBranched Universal Sequence-based reagentLai et al., 2016[Phos] GAC TCT CAA CTA TC +T + A
Sequence-based reagentTSHerbert et al., 2006AAT CCG TCG AGC AGA GTT
Sequence-based reagentACXHerbert et al., 2006GCG CGG CTT ACC CTT ACC CTT ACC CTA ACC
Sequence-based reagentTel1BLuo et al. 2020CGG TTT GTT TGG GTT TGG GTT TGG GTT TGG GTT TGG GTT
Sequence-based reagentTel2BLuo et al. 2020GGC TTG CCT TAC CCT TAC CCT TAC CCT TAC CCT TAC CCT
Sequence-based reagentHBG1Cawthon, 2002GCT TCT GAC ACA ACT GTG TTC ACT AGC
Sequence-based reagentHBG2Cawthon, 2002CAC CAA CTT CAT CCA CGT TCA CC
Sequence-based reagentTINF2BioRaddHsaCPE5027564
Sequence-based reagentPOT1BioRaddHsaCPE50447370
Sequence-based reagentTERTBioRaddHsaCPE5048434
Sequence-based reagentTERCBioRaddHsaCNS923142164
Sequence-based reagentACTBBioRaddHsaCPE5190200

Data availability

Sequencing data was deposited in GEO: GSE160871.

The following data sets were generated
    1. Fernandez RJ
    2. Johnson FB
    3. Tobias JW
    (2021) NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus
    ID GSE160871. Transcriptional profiling of short telomere iPS-derived sorted SFTPC+ iAT2 cells.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE160871

References

  5. Conference
    1. An WF
    2. Germain AR
    3. Bishop JA
    4. Nag PP
    5. Metkar S
    6. Ketterman J
    7. Walk M
    8. Weiwer M
    9. Liu X
    10. Patnaik D
    (2012)
    Discovery of Potent and Highly Selective Inhibitors of GSK3b, Probe Reports from the NIH Molecular Libraries Program
    National Center for Biotechnology Information (US.
  22. Software
    1. Dolgalev I
    (2020)
    msigdbr: MSigDB Gene Sets for Multiple Organisms in a Tidy Data Format
    Msigdbr.
  32. Software
    1. Hadley Wickham JB
    (2019)
    readxl: Read Excel Files
    Readxl.
  86. Software
    1. R Development Core Team
    (2020) R: A language and environment for statistical computing
    R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
    http://www.r-project.org
  90. Software
    1. RStudio Team
    (2020)
    RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R
    RStudio, PBC.
    1. Telomeres Mendelian Randomization Collaboration
    2. Haycock PC
    3. Burgess S
    4. Nounu A
    5. Zheng J
    6. Okoli GN
    7. Bowden J
    8. Wade KH
    9. Timpson NJ
    10. Evans DM
    11. Willeit P
    12. Aviv A
    13. Gaunt TR
    14. Hemani G
    15. Mangino M
    16. Ellis HP
    17. Kurian KM
    18. Pooley KA
    19. Eeles RA
    20. Lee JE
    21. Fang S
    22. Chen WV
    23. Law MH
    24. Bowdler LM
    25. Iles MM
    26. Yang Q
    27. Worrall BB
    28. Markus HS
    29. Hung RJ
    30. Amos CI
    31. Spurdle AB
    32. Thompson DJ
    33. O’Mara TA
    34. Wolpin B
    35. Amundadottir L
    36. Stolzenberg-Solomon R
    37. Trichopoulou A
    38. Onland-Moret NC
    39. Lund E
    40. Duell EJ
    41. Canzian F
    42. Severi G
    43. Overvad K
    44. Gunter MJ
    45. Tumino R
    46. Svenson U
    47. van Rij A
    48. Baas AF
    49. Bown MJ
    50. Samani NJ
    51. van t’Hof FNG
    52. Tromp G
    53. Jones GT
    54. Kuivaniemi H
    55. Elmore JR
    56. Johansson M
    57. Mckay J
    58. Scelo G
    59. Carreras-Torres R
    60. Gaborieau V
    61. Brennan P
    62. Bracci PM
    63. Neale RE
    64. Olson SH
    65. Gallinger S
    66. Li D
    67. Petersen GM
    68. Risch HA
    69. Klein AP
    70. Han J
    71. Abnet CC
    72. Freedman ND
    73. Taylor PR
    74. Maris JM
    75. Aben KK
    76. Kiemeney LA
    77. Vermeulen SH
    78. Wiencke JK
    79. Walsh KM
    80. Wrensch M
    81. Rice T
    82. Turnbull C
    83. Litchfield K
    84. Paternoster L
    85. Standl M
    86. Abecasis GR
    87. SanGiovanni JP
    88. Li Y
    89. Mijatovic V
    90. Sapkota Y
    91. Low S-K
    92. Zondervan KT
    93. Montgomery GW
    94. Nyholt DR
    95. van Heel DA
    96. Hunt K
    97. Arking DE
    98. Ashar FN
    99. Sotoodehnia N
    100. Woo D
    101. Rosand J
    102. Comeau ME
    103. Brown WM
    104. Silverman EK
    105. Hokanson JE
    106. Cho MH
    107. Hui J
    108. Ferreira MA
    109. Thompson PJ
    110. Morrison AC
    111. Felix JF
    112. Smith NL
    113. Christiano AM
    114. Petukhova L
    115. Betz RC
    116. Fan X
    117. Zhang X
    118. Zhu C
    119. Langefeld CD
    120. Thompson SD
    121. Wang F
    122. Lin X
    123. Schwartz DA
    124. Fingerlin T
    125. Rotter JI
    126. Cotch MF
    127. Jensen RA
    128. Munz M
    129. Dommisch H
    130. Schaefer AS
    131. Han F
    132. Ollila HM
    133. Hillary RP
    134. Albagha O
    135. Ralston SH
    136. Zeng C
    137. Zheng W
    138. Shu X-O
    139. Reis A
    140. Uebe S
    141. Hüffmeier U
    142. Kawamura Y
    143. Otowa T
    144. Sasaki T
    145. Hibberd ML
    146. Davila S
    147. Xie G
    148. Siminovitch K
    149. Bei J-X
    150. Zeng Y-X
    151. Försti A
    152. Chen B
    153. Landi S
    154. Franke A
    155. Fischer A
    156. Ellinghaus D
    157. Flores C
    158. Noth I
    159. Ma S-F
    160. Foo JN
    161. Liu J
    162. Kim J-W
    163. Cox DG
    164. Delattre O
    165. Mirabeau O
    166. Skibola CF
    167. Tang CS
    168. Garcia-Barcelo M
    169. Chang K-P
    170. Su W-H
    171. Chang Y-S
    172. Martin NG
    173. Gordon S
    174. Wade TD
    175. Lee C
    176. Kubo M
    177. Cha P-C
    178. Nakamura Y
    179. Levy D
    180. Kimura M
    181. Hwang S-J
    182. Hunt S
    183. Spector T
    184. Soranzo N
    185. Manichaikul AW
    186. Barr RG
    187. Kahali B
    188. Speliotes E
    189. Yerges-Armstrong LM
    190. Cheng C-Y
    191. Jonas JB
    192. Wong TY
    193. Fogh I
    194. Lin K
    195. Powell JF
    196. Rice K
    197. Relton CL
    198. Martin RM
    199. Davey Smith G
    (2017) Association Between Telomere Length and Risk of Cancer and Non-Neoplastic Diseases: A Mendelian Randomization Study
    JAMA Oncology 3:636–651.
    https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5945
  117. Software
    1. Yihui Xie J
    (2020)
    DT: A Wrapper of the JavaScript Library
    DataTables.
  120. Software
    1. Yu G
    (2020)
    enrichplot: Visualization of Functional Enrichment Result
    Enrichplot.

Decision letter

  1. Weiwei Dang
    Reviewing Editor; Baylor College of Medicine, United States
  2. Jessica K Tyler
    Senior Editor; Weill Cornell Medicine, United States

Our editorial process produces two outputs: i) public reviews designed to be posted alongside the preprint for the benefit of readers; ii) feedback on the manuscript for the authors, including requests for revisions, shown below. We also include an acceptance summary that explains what the editors found interesting or important about the work.

Decision letter after peer review:

Thank you for submitting your article "GSK3 inhibition rescues growth and telomere dysfunction in dyskeratosis congenita iPSC-derived type II alveolar cells" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by 2 peer reviewers, one of whom is a member of our Board of Reviewing Editors, and the evaluation has been overseen by Matt Kaeberlein as the Senior Editor. The reviewers have opted to remain anonymous.

The reviewers have discussed their reviews with one another, and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this to help you prepare a revised submission.

Essential revisions:

1) The mutant cells showed down-regulation of shelterin component genes (TINF2 and POT1) downstream of the Wnt signaling pathway. To show that the GSK3 inhibitor CHIR99021 acted through Wnt signaling in iAT2 cells, the authors should show that the expression of these genes can be restored by the treatment.

2) the authors use iPSCs that are 5 vs 25 passages after introduction (or not) of the DKC1 A386T mutation for the generation of iAT2 cells. The data presented in Figure S3D simply does not correspond to the statement that "using iPSCs only five passages after the introduction of the mutation yielded iAT2s without any defects in alveolosphere growth or size at D70 (Figure S3C)" as the images in Figure S3D appear clearly distinguishable. the iPSCs 5 passages after gene editing may certainly be less effected, which would not take away from the authors may point (it is not the DKC1 A386T mutation per se). The manuscript needs to either include rigorous data as in Figure 1C and/or 1D or render a qualitive assessment that is better supported by the data presented.

3) The authors show iAT2 DKC1 mutant organoids generated from the later passage iPSCs have an apparent growth defect as early as Day 50 but that those generated from the earlier passage iPSCs do not at Day 70 [with caveats the images are of different quality (comparing Figure 1B and Figure S3D) and quantitative data (similar to Figure 1C) are lacking for the iAT2 organoids generated from the early passage iPSCs]. This needs to be addressed. Is it possible that there are two different processes – an initial constraint imposed by shortened telomeres (D50) and then a more catastrophic effect due to uncapping (D70)?

4) It is striking that prolonged CHIR99021 treatment (ie, through to Day 70) resulted in increased telomerase activity, and more so in mutant compared to wild type cells. First, how reproducible was this effect? Given TERT expression does not rescue DKC1 mutants but TERC does, were TERC levels increased? Also, given this robust increase, its striking that no difference is detected in TeSLA assays given the proportion of very short detected telomeres that would presumably be substrates for telomerase.

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):

– The analysis shown in Figure 1C should be done for the experiment performed with iPSCs 5 passages after introduction of the DKC1 A386T mutation.

– An apoptosis positive control is lacking for Figure S3E.

– The figure legend for Figure S4B does not make sense nor correlate with the main text description (lines 209-211). It appears that an experiment was designed whereby CHIR99021 was either present or removed after D56 and the cells analyzed at D70 (Figure S4A) but the data are not shown in Figure S4B.

– The graphics Figure 1A and S3C show Day 49 but the text reads Day 50 – this is confusing.

– It is not stated whether the analyses performed in Figure 2 are using cells derived from iPSCs 25 passages after introduction of the DKC1 mutation (It is likely this is the case, but it should be clearly stated).

– Line 138 – Should refer to Figure S3C-D.

– The methods section should be carefully reviewed for formatting consistency throughout – e.g.., use of capitalization or not.

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):

1. The mutant cells showed down-regulation of shelterin component genes (TINF2 and POT1) downstream of the Wnt signaling pathway. To show that the GSK3 inhibitor CHIR99021 acted through Wnt signaling in iAT2 cells, the authors should show that the expression of these genes can be restored by the treatment.

2. Is Wnt signaling required for CHIR99021 to show its effects on cellular senescence and telomere dysfunction? This should be examined and discussed.

3. The authors showed little change in telomere length, but increased telomerase activity by CHIR99021 treatment in iAT2 cells. Some further discussion on this will be helpful for readers to understand why this is the case.

4. Wnt has been shown to regulate TERT expression. Hence, it should be tested here whether increased telomerase activity is attributed to increased TERT expression and/or TERC expression.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64430.sa1

Author response

Essential revisions:

1) The mutant cells showed down-regulation of shelterin component genes (TINF2 and POT1) downstream of the Wnt signaling pathway. To show that the GSK3 inhibitor CHIR99021 acted through Wnt signaling in iAT2 cells, the authors should show that the expression of these genes can be restored by the treatment.

We agree that this is an interesting issue and that demonstrating restoration of shelterin expression by CHIR would support the hypothesis that changes in shelterin levels are involved in the mechanism by which CHIR rescues defects in the mutant iAT2 cells. We have attempted to demonstrate this using two approaches*, but unfortunately have been unable to do so. We are sorry about this (and want to emphasize that it has been very difficult to make these attempts under the conditions of the pandemic, particularly given the months-long cultures needed to do experiments along with unpredictable lab shut downs, as well as supply chain issues (particularly Matrigel shortages)). Regardless, we want to emphasize three things: 1) we haven’t claimed that shelterin upregulation is involved in rescue, 2) whether or not we know the precise mechanism of rescue doesn’t affect the overall findings of our paper nor the potential therapeutic relevance of the rescue, and 3) we now provide new and clearer data supporting a role for differences in telomerase expression and activity (which are well-known to be upregulated by Wnt in diverse contexts) as contributors to mutant defects and to the rescue by CHIR (see Point 4, below).

­­– In particular, we compared mRNA transcript levels in wild type and mutant iAT2 cultures under basal and rescued conditions using both scRNAseq and ddPCR assays. Unfortunately, we had technical problems with the scRNAseq and have so far been unable to repeat the experiment. The ddPCR data was too variable under rescued conditions to be interpretable, and we ran out of RNA before getting satisfactory results (but fortunately the ddPCR did provide clear data comparing wild type and mutant cultures under basal conditions, now provided in Figure 3—figure supplement 1). We will eventually repeat the scRNAseq, but we feel such analyses are really outside the scope of the manuscript.

2) The authors use iPSCs that are 5 vs 25 passages after introduction (or not) of the DKC1 A386T mutation for the generation of iAT2 cells. The data presented in Figure S3D simply does not correspond to the statement that "using iPSCs only five passages after the introduction of the mutation yielded iAT2s without any defects in alveolosphere growth or size at D70 (Figure S3C)" as the images in Figure S3D appear clearly distinguishable. the iPSCs 5 passages after gene editing may certainly be less effected, which would not take away from the authors may point (it is not the DKC1 A386T mutation per se). The manuscript needs to either include rigorous data as in Figure 1C and/or 1D or render a qualitive assessment that is better supported by the data presented.

We appreciate these concerns and have updated the manuscript to offer a qualitative assessment that more accurately reflects the data. Furthermore, we quantified the organoid formation efficiency for the iAT2s derived from passage 5 iPSCs (see Figure 1—figure supplement 4 A-C).

In particular, the modified sentence reads as follows: “In contrast, using iPSCs only five passages after the introduction of the mutation yielded iAT2s with less dramatic defects in alveolosphere growth and size at D70 (Figure S3C-E).”

3) The authors show iAT2 DKC1 mutant organoids generated from the later passage iPSCs have an apparent growth defect as early as Day 50 but that those generated from the earlier passage iPSCs do not at Day 70 [with caveats the images are of different quality (comparing Figure 1B and Figure S3D) and quantitative data (similar to Figure 1C) are lacking for the iAT2 organoids generated from the early passage iPSCs]. This needs to be addressed. Is it possible that there are two different processes – an initial constraint imposed by shortened telomeres (D50) and then a more catastrophic effect due to uncapping (D70)?

We agree that there is a progressive defect with passage. This observation is consistent with a substantial body of literature in the telomere field, and is likely explained by two phenomena:

First, although the rate of telomere shortening is gradual at the level of a population of cells (each with its own collection of 92 telomeres), this rate is somewhat stochastic for any given telomere (e.g. a telomere can shorten dramatically and instantaneously due to an error during DNA replication), leading some cells to begin experiencing growth restriction earlier than other cells. Thus, at the level of a population of cells, growth declines in gradual fashion as an increasing fraction of the population becomes senescent. E.g. see Stochasticity of Telomere Shortening dictates Culture Senescence in Fibroblasts (Martin-Ruiz et al., 2004) and The replicometer is broken: telomeres activate cellular senescence in response to genotoxic stresses (Suram and Herbig, 2014).

Second, there is clear evidence that telomeres do not lose their functions in an “all or none” fashion as they shorten. For example, partially shortened telomeres can activate ATM (and thus senescence) prior to the stage at which telomeres that have shortened even further become fusogenic. It is also thought (but not yet proven) that as telomeres shorten below a particular threshold length, the tendency to activate DNA damage responses may increase in a somewhat graded fashion with additional shortening (e.g. perhaps by impacting the equilibrium between telomeres in linear vs. t-loop conformations). Therefore, it is conceivable that gradual telomere shortening may increasingly inhibit cell cycle progression. E.g. see (Cesare et al., 2009, 2013; Kaul et al., 2011; Ruis and Boulton, 2021a; Van Ly et al., 2018a).

We have modified the Discussion to highlight our thoughts on these points with a new text, as follows:

“Senescence of the mutant iAT2 cells displayed a senescent phenotype that manifested only after serial passaging and telomere shortening, demonstrating that the senescence is not a direct result of DKC1 mutation per se. The senescence-associated growth defect emerged gradually, becoming more pronounced at later passages. Similarly gradual onset of telomere-driven senescence has been observed in other settings, and has been attributed to i) the stochastic nature of telomere shortening (causing some cells in a population to senesce prior to others) and ii) graded increases in DNA damage-responses in proportion to the extent of telomere shortening (Cesare et al., 2009, 2013; Kaul et al., 2011; Martin-Ruiz et al., 2004; Ruis and Boulton, 2021b; Suram and Herbig, 2014; Van Ly et al., 2018b).”

4) It is striking that prolonged CHIR99021 treatment (ie, through to Day 70) resulted in increased telomerase activity, and more so in mutant compared to wild type cells. First, how reproducible was this effect? Given TERT expression does not rescue DKC1 mutants but TERC does, were TERC levels increased? Also, given this robust increase, its striking that no difference is detected in TeSLA assays given the proportion of very short detected telomeres that would presumably be substrates for telomerase.

We agree that this finding was striking (and surprising), and upon repetition we noticed that the WT organoids were at a much higher level of confluence than the DKC1 mutant organoids when they were assayed for telomerase activity. Given the well-established general upregulation of telomerase activity in cycling cells, it seemed likely that the relative unresponsiveness of the WT cells to CHIR was explained by their relatively diminished freedom to divide under these conditions. Indeed, upon repeating the experiment at lower cell densities, which permitted proliferation of both genotypes, we observed upregulation of telomerase activity with CHIR in both genotypes, with more dramatic upregulation in the mutant cultures but only up to the same absolute level as WT (i.e. CHIR restored telomerase levels to that of WT). We have updated the manuscript to reflect this data (Figure 4 G). This doesn’t impact the major conclusions of the study, and still indicates that upregulation of telomerase activity contributes to the rescue by CHIR99021 of mutant organoid growth.

The reviewer is correct that TERC overexpression rescues telomerase activity in DKC1 mutant cells. But it is not correct that it has been shown that elevated TERT do not provide rescue in these mutant. Indeed, when TERT levels are limiting, artificial expression of TERT does enhance telomerase activity in DKC1 mutant cells (Wong and Collins, 2006) (See Figure 1 of Wong and Collins 2006). While we have not directly tested if TERT levels are limiting in our cultured iAT2 cells, it is likely that they are like most other human cell types where TERT levels are limiting. With regard to TERC, although we were able to discern a clear decrease in TERC (and TERT) mRNA levels in the mutant iAT2 cells by ddPCR (see Figure 3—figure supplement 1), technical limitations (described above in Point 1) prevented us from establishing clear rescue of TERC levels under conditions of rescue by CHIR99021. However, given that TERC levels are generally upregulated by Myc, and that Myc is generally upregulated by GSK3 inhibition, there is a good possibility that CHIR99021 does indeed upregulate TERC levels, which could also contribute to the elevated telomerase activity. Regardless of the underlying mechanisms, the restoration of telomerase activity by GSK3 inhibition is of potential translational therapeutic importance.

We agree that the lack of telomere lengthening by TeSLA is surprising, as it is not what our group has seen previously with intestinal organoids with similar mutations. As we mentioned in the manuscript, we cannot rule out lengthening of the shortest telomeres that are too short to be detected by TeSLA. We also note that mean telomere lengths were actually increased by ~20%. Finally, TERT may be enhancing capping without lengthening by binding to uncapped telomeres and displacing DDR factors (Perera et al., 2019).

To address the above issues, we have modified the Results section as follows:

“We ultimately investigated how CHIR99021 affects the telomere status of DC iAT2s. CHIR treated iAT2 cells showed fewer cells with 53BP1 foci, fewer p21+ cells and fewer TIF+ cells (Figure 4 D-F). TeSLA revealed a modest increase in average telomere length but no apparent decrease in the frequency of shortest detectable telomeres (Figure 4—figure supplement 3 A-C). iAT2 cell telomerase activity was restored in mutant cells treated with CHIR99021 to levels similar to those seen in WT cells (Figure 4G). Together, these data argue that GSK3 inhibition not only rescues the growth of DC iAT2 cells, but it also rescues telomere defects, most likely through upregulation of telomerase activity that could extend telomeres that are shorter than those that can be detected by TeSLA; it is also possible that telomerase is contributing to telomere capping via lengthening-independent mechanisms (Perera et al., 2019). Of note, withdrawal of CHIR99021 during only the 14 days prior to D70 was sufficient to elicit the growth defect (Figure 4—figure supplement 1 A-B), consistent with an only modest increase in telomere length associated with the increased telomerase activity.”

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):

– The analysis shown in Figure 1C should be done for the experiment performed with iPSCs 5 passages after introduction of the DKC1 A386T mutation.

Please see our response above to Essential Revision 2. Furthermore, we have quantified organoid formation efficiency for the cultures derived from passage 5 iPSCs, as requested (see Figure S3E), and as expected, the efficiencies are indistinguishable between the wild type and mutant cultures. We were unable to accurately quantify organoid areas given the quality of the images we obtained for these particular cultures, but numerous direct observations never revealed any obvious differences in organoid sizes between wild type and mutant under these conditions.

– An apoptosis positive control is lacking for Figure S3E.

We appreciate this suggestion, and we have added a positive control to Figure 2—figure supplement 1 C and explained it in detail within the figure legend.

– The figure legend for Figure S4B does not make sense nor correlate with the main text description (lines 209-211). It appears that an experiment was designed whereby CHIR99021 was either present or removed after D56 and the cells analyzed at D70 (Figure S4A) but the data are not shown in Figure S4B.

We agree that the figure legend may not adequately reflect the data presented and the main text. We have included your suggestions and believe they help clarify the experiment performed. To simplify presentation of data, previous Figure S4 has been divided into new Figure 4—figure supplements 1, 2 and 3, and the relevant data is in the Figure 4—figure supplement 1.

– The graphics Figure 1A and S3C show Day 49 but the text reads Day 50 – this is confusing.

We appreciate how this might be confusing and have changed references to Day 49 to Day 50.

– It is not stated whether the analyses performed in Figure 2 are using cells derived from iPSCs 25 passages after introduction of the DKC1 mutation (It is likely this is the case, but it should be clearly stated).

We have changed the heading titles as well as the figure titles to reflect this more clearly.

– Line 138 – Should refer to Figure S3C-D.

We agree and have changed the reference to the supplementary figures.

– The methods section should be carefully reviewed for formatting consistency throughout – e.g.., use of capitalization or not.

We appreciate the reviewer’s suggestion and have made the requested edits to the experimental procedures section.

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):

1. The mutant cells showed down-regulation of shelterin component genes (TINF2 and POT1) downstream of the Wnt signaling pathway. To show that the GSK3 inhibitor CHIR99021 acted through Wnt signaling in iAT2 cells, the authors should show that the expression of these genes can be restored by the treatment.

See our response to essential revision 4 above.

2. Is Wnt signaling required for CHIR99021 to show its effects on cellular senescence and telomere dysfunction? This should be examined and discussed.

We are unsure of precisely what the reviewer is asking for here, but we imagine that they might be thinking of a couple of different and important issues. First, we want to address the possibility that CHIR99021 might have non-GSK3 dependent effects (i.e. how specific an inhibitor of GSK3 is CHIR99021)? To our knowledge, it is the most selective GSK3 inhibitor available (An et al., 2012), and we direct the reviewers to the original paper addressing this issue which shows it is >500-fold selective for GSKs as compared to many other kinases (Ring et al., 2003). Furthermore, the fact that we observe similar rescue with a different GSK3 inhibitor (CHIR98014) supports a role for GSK3 (and thus Wnt). Second, we want to address the possibility that the precise nature of GSK3 inhibition by CHIR99021 vs. that by Wnt might cause different effects downstream of GSK3. There are indeed multiple different possible downstream effects of the inhibition of GSK3, and it’s conceivable that these are impacted differentially by different GSK3 inhibitors. We don’t know the answer to this question, but as we describe in the manuscript, the DKC1 mutation induces transcriptional changes in the Wnt pathway and CHIR99021 rescues the growth and telomere phenotypes. Furthermore, CHIR99021 is commonly used to replace Wnt ligands in multiple different differentiation protocols (Loh et al., 2016; Pagliuca et al., 2014; Rezania et al., 2014; Teo et al., 2014), supporting its similarity to Wnts. However, we are aware that canonical Wnts and CHIR99021 are not exactly the same in terms of their activation kinetics (Massey et al., 2019), and don’t discount the possibility that this could impact effects on downstream targets. These are important issues under active investigation, but we feel that they are outside the scope of our manuscript.

We now include these important caveats in the Discussion, as follows:

“We note that the effects of CHIR99021 could differ in some ways from canonical Wnt signaling, e.g. by impacting targets other than GSK3 or by differentially affecting the numerous pathways that are downstream of GSK3. However, the Wnt-related transcriptional changes in the mutant iAT2s, the high selectivity of CHIR99021 for GSK3 and its common use as a replacement for Wnt ligands in cell culture differentiation protocols, along with the fact that two different GSK3 inhibitors rescued growth of the mutant iAT2s suggest that the rescue provided by CHIR99021 is indeed related to GSK3 and Wnt (An et al., 2012; Loh et al., 2016; Pagliuca et al., 2014; Rezania et al., 2014; Ring et al., 2003; Teo et al., 2014).”

3. The authors showed little change in telomere length, but increased telomerase activity by CHIR99021 treatment in iAT2 cells. Some further discussion on this will be helpful for readers to understand why this is the case.

Thank you for this suggestion. Please see our response to Essential Revision 4, above.

The most relevant part of that response is reproduced here:

“We agree that the lack of telomere lengthening by TeSLA is surprising, as it is not what our group has seen previously with intestinal organoids with similar mutations. As we mentioned in the manuscript, we cannot rule out lengthening of the shortest telomeres that are too short to be detected by TeSLA. We also note that mean telomere lengths were actually increased by ~20%. Finally, TERT may be enhancing capping without lengthening by binding to uncapped telomeres and displacing DDR factors (Perera et al., 2019).”

4. Wnt has been shown to regulate TERT expression. Hence, it should be tested here whether increased telomerase activity is attributed to increased TERT expression and/or TERC expression.

Again, please see our response to Essential Revision 4, above.

In particular, as the reviewer points out, it is well established that TERT is Wnt target gene in diverse contexts, and its upregulation presumably contributes to the increase in telomerase activity that we observe in CHIR-treated cultures. Nonetheless, given that TERC levels are generally upregulated by Myc, and that Myc is generally upregulated by GSK3 inhibition, there is a good possibility that CHIR does indeed upregulate TERC levels, which could also contribute to the elevated telomerase activity.

References

An, W.F., Germain, A.R., Bishop, J.A., Nag, P.P., Metkar, S., Ketterman, J., Walk, M., Weiwer, M., Liu, X., Patnaik, D., et al. (2012). Discovery of Potent and Highly Selective Inhibitors of GSK3b. In Probe Reports from the NIH Molecular Libraries Program, (Bethesda (MD): National Center for Biotechnology Information (US)),.

Cesare, A.J., Kaul, Z., Cohen, S.B., Napier, C.E., Pickett, H.A., Neumann, A.A., and Reddel, R.R. (2009). Spontaneous occurrence of telomeric DNA damage response in the absence of chromosome fusions. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 1244–1251.

Cesare, A.J., Hayashi, M.T., Crabbe, L., and Karlseder, J. (2013). The telomere deprotection response is functionally distinct from the genomic DNA damage response. Mol. Cell 51, 141–155.

Kaul, Z., Cesare, A.J., Huschtscha, L.I., Neumann, A.A., and Reddel, R.R. (2011). Five dysfunctional telomeres predict onset of senescence in human cells. EMBO Rep. 13, 52–59.

Loh, K.M., Chen, A., Koh, P.W., Deng, T.Z., Sinha, R., Tsai, J.M., Barkal, A.A., Shen, K.Y., Jain, R., Morganti, R.M., et al. (2016). Mapping the Pairwise Choices Leading from Pluripotency to Human Bone, Heart, and Other Mesoderm Cell Types. Cell 166, 451–467.

Martin-Ruiz, C., Saretzki, G., Petrie, J., Ladhoff, J., Jeyapalan, J., Wei, W., Sedivy, J., and von Zglinicki, T. (2004). Stochastic variation in telomere shortening rate causes heterogeneity of human fibroblast replicative life span. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 17826–17833.

Massey, J., Liu, Y., Alvarenga, O., Saez, T., Schmerer, M., and Warmflash, A. (2019). Synergy with TGFβ ligands switches WNT pathway dynamics from transient to sustained during human pluripotent cell differentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 116, 4989–4998.

Pagliuca, F.W., Millman, J.R., Gürtler, M., Segel, M., Van Dervort, A., Ryu, J.H., Peterson, Q.P., Greiner, D., and Melton, D.A. (2014). Generation of functional human pancreatic β cells in vitro. Cell 159, 428–439.

Perera, O.N., Sobinoff, A.P., Teber, E.T., Harman, A., Maritz, M.F., Yang, S.F., Pickett, H.A., Cesare, A.J., Arthur, J.W., MacKenzie, K.L., et al. (2019). Telomerase promotes formation of a telomere protective complex in cancer cells. Sci Adv 5, eaav4409.

Rezania, A., Bruin, J.E., Arora, P., Rubin, A., Batushansky, I., Asadi, A., O’Dwyer, S., Quiskamp, N., Mojibian, M., Albrecht, T., et al. (2014). Reversal of diabetes with insulin-producing cells derived in vitro from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 1121–1133.

Ring, D.B., Johnson, K.W., Henriksen, E.J., Nuss, J.M., Goff, D., Kinnick, T.R., Ma, S.T., Reeder, J.W., Samuels, I., Slabiak, T., et al. (2003). Selective glycogen synthase kinase 3 inhibitors potentiate insulin activation of glucose transport and utilization in vitro and in vivo. Diabetes 52, 588–595.

Ruis, P., and Boulton, S.J. (2021a). The end protection problem—an unexpected twist in the tail. Genes & Development 35, 1–21.

Ruis, P., and Boulton, S.J. (2021b). The end protection problem—an unexpected twist in the tail. Genes & Development 35, 1–21.

Suram, A., and Herbig, U. (2014). The replicometer is broken: telomeres activate cellular senescence in response to genotoxic stresses. Aging Cell 13, 780–786.

Teo, A.K.K., Valdez, I.A., Dirice, E., and Kulkarni, R.N. (2014). Comparable generation of activin-induced definitive endoderm via additive Wnt or BMP signaling in absence of serum. Stem Cell Reports 3, 5–14.

Van Ly, D., Low, R.R.J., Frölich, S., Bartolec, T.K., Kafer, G.R., Pickett, H.A., Gaus, K., and Cesare, A.J. (2018a). Telomere Loop Dynamics in Chromosome End Protection. Mol. Cell 71, 510–525.e6.

Van Ly, D., Low, R.R.J., Frölich, S., Bartolec, T.K., Kafer, G.R., Pickett, H.A., Gaus, K., and Cesare, A.J. (2018b). Telomere Loop Dynamics in Chromosome End Protection. Mol. Cell 71, 510–525.e6.

Wong, J.M.Y., and Collins, K. (2006). Telomerase RNA level limits telomere maintenance in X-linked dyskeratosis congenita. Genes Dev. 20, 2848–2858.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64430.sa2

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Rafael Jesus Fernandez

    1. Medical Scientist Training Program, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    2. Cell and Molecular Biology Graduate Group, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    3. Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9295-4810

  2. Zachary JG Gardner

    1. Medical Scientist Training Program, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    2. Cell and Molecular Biology Graduate Group, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    3. Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Contribution
    Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  3. Katherine J Slovik

    Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Contribution
    Methodology
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  4. Derek C Liberti

    Cell and Molecular Biology Graduate Group, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Contribution
    Methodology, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2991-9283

  5. Katrina N Estep

    Cell and Molecular Biology Graduate Group, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Contribution
    Investigation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  6. Wenli Yang

    1. Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    2. Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Contribution
    Methodology, Resources
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  7. Qijun Chen

    Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Contribution
    Investigation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  8. Garrett T Santini

    Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Contribution
    Investigation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  9. Javier V Perez

    Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Contribution
    Investigation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  10. Sarah Root

    College of Arts and Sciences and Vagelos Scholars Program, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Contribution
    Investigation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  11. Ranvir Bhatia

    Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Contribution
    Investigation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  12. John W Tobias

    Penn Genomic Analysis Core, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Contribution
    Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Software, Visualization
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  13. Apoorva Babu

    1. Penn Cardiovascular Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    2. Penn-CHOP Lung Biology Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Contribution
    Data curation, Formal analysis, Resources, Software, Visualization
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  14. Michael P Morley

    1. Penn Cardiovascular Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    2. Penn-CHOP Lung Biology Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Contribution
    Data curation, Formal analysis, Resources, Software, Visualization
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  15. David B Frank

    1. Penn-CHOP Lung Biology Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    2. Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, United States
    Contribution
    Resources
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  16. Edward E Morrisey

    1. Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    2. Penn Cardiovascular Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    3. Penn-CHOP Lung Biology Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Contribution
    Resources
    Competing interests
    Reviewing editor, eLife
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5785-1939

  17. Christopher J Lengner

    1. Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    2. Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review and editing
    For correspondence
    lengner@vet.upenn.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0574-5189

  18. F Brad Johnson

    1. Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    2. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    3. Institute on Aging, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing
    For correspondence
    johnsonb@pennmedicine.upenn.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7443-7227

Funding

National Institute on Aging (R21AG054209)

  • Christopher J Lengner
  • F Brad Johnson

National Institute on Aging (5T32AG000255)

  • Rafael Jesus Fernandez

Team Telomere/Penn Orphan Disease Center

  • Christopher J Lengner
  • F Brad Johnson

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL148821)

  • Christopher J Lengner
  • F Brad Johnson

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Drs. Eric Witze, Peter Klein, Timothy Olson, Andrew Vaughan, Leo Cardenas, and Aravind Sivakumar for fruitful discussions. We would like to thank Dr. Dong Hun Woo, Carla Hoge, John McCormick, and Dr. Rachel Truitt for help culturing iPS cells, and Dr. Darrell Kotton for providing the BU3 NGST line. We also thank Drs. Erica Carpenter and Jacob Till for help with the ddPCR. This work was also supported in part by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) Center for Molecular Studies in Digestive and Liver Diseases (P30DK050306) and its Molecular Profiling and Imaging core facilities, by the University of Pennsylvania induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Core and the Penn Genomic Analysis Core, by the Flow Cytometry Core Laboratory, the Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Core at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute, and the Abramson Cancer Center BioRepository Shared Resource and the Cancer Center Support Grant from the NCI, P30 CA016520.

Senior Editor

  1. Jessica K Tyler, Weill Cornell Medicine, United States

Reviewing Editor

  1. Weiwei Dang, Baylor College of Medicine, United States

Publication history

  1. Preprint posted: October 28, 2020 (view preprint)
  2. Received: October 28, 2020
  3. Accepted: May 11, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: May 13, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: June 15, 2022 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2022, Fernandez et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Rafael Jesus Fernandez
  2. Zachary JG Gardner
  3. Katherine J Slovik
  4. Derek C Liberti
  5. Katrina N Estep
  6. Wenli Yang
  7. Qijun Chen
  8. Garrett T Santini
  9. Javier V Perez
  10. Sarah Root
  11. Ranvir Bhatia
  12. John W Tobias
  13. Apoorva Babu
  14. Michael P Morley
  15. David B Frank
  16. Edward E Morrisey
  17. Christopher J Lengner
  18. F Brad Johnson
(2022)
GSK3 inhibition rescues growth and telomere dysfunction in dyskeratosis congenita iPSC-derived type II alveolar epithelial cells
eLife 11:e64430.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64430

Categories and tags

Research organism