Intronic enhancer region governs transcript-specific Bdnf expression in rodent neurons
- Tallinn University of Technology, Estonia
- Kings College London, United Kingdom
Abstract
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) controls the survival, growth, and function of neurons both during the development and in the adult nervous system. Bdnf is transcribed from several distinct promoters generating transcripts with alternative 5' exons. Bdnf transcripts initiated at the first cluster of exons have been associated with the regulation of body weight and various aspects of social behavior, but the mechanisms driving the expression of these transcripts have remained poorly understood. Here, we identify an evolutionarily conserved intronic enhancer region inside the Bdnf gene that regulates both basal and stimulus-dependent expression of the Bdnf transcripts starting from the first cluster of 5' exons in mouse and rat neurons. We further uncover a functional E-box element in the enhancer region, linking the expression of Bdnf and various pro-neural basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors. Collectively, our results shed new light on the cell-type- and stimulus-specific regulation of the important neurotrophic factor BDNF.
Data availability
Mass-spectrometry results of the in vitro DNA pulldown experiment are provided in Supplementary Table 3.
-
Widespread transcription at neuronal activity-regulated enhancersNCBI Gene Expression Omnibus, GSE21161.
-
Rapid and Pervasive Changes in Genome-Wide Enhancer Usage During Mammalian DevelopmentNCBI Gene Expression Omnibus, GSE52386.
-
Genome-wide identification and characterization of functional neuronal activity-dependent enhancersNCBI Gene Expression Omnibus, GSE60192.
-
NeuroD2 ChIP-SEQ from embryonic cortexNCBI Gene Expression Omnibus, GSE67539.
-
A protein interaction network of mental disorder factors in neural stem cellsNCBI Gene Expression Omnibus, GSE70872.
-
Genome-wide maps of EGR1 binding in mouse frontal cortexNCBI Gene Expression Omnibus, GSE67482.
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
Estonian Research Council (IUT19-18)
- Jürgen Tuvikene
- Eli-Eelika Esvald
- Annika Rähni
- Kaie Uustalu
- Annela Avarlaid
- Tõnis Timmusk
Estonian Research Council (PRG805)
- Jürgen Tuvikene
- Eli-Eelika Esvald
- Annela Avarlaid
- Tõnis Timmusk
Norwegian Financial Mechanism (EMP128)
- Jürgen Tuvikene
- Eli-Eelika Esvald
- Annika Rähni
- Kaie Uustalu
- Tõnis Timmusk
European Regional Development Fund (2014-2020.4.01.15-0012)
- Jürgen Tuvikene
- Eli-Eelika Esvald
- Annika Rähni
- Kaie Uustalu
- Annela Avarlaid
- Tõnis Timmusk
H2020-MSCA-RISE-2016 (EU734791)
- Jürgen Tuvikene
- Eli-Eelika Esvald
- Anna Zhuravskaya
- Annela Avarlaid
- Eugene V Makeyev
- Tõnis Timmusk
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/M001199/1)
- Anna Zhuravskaya
- Eugene V Makeyev
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/M007103/1)
- Anna Zhuravskaya
- Eugene V Makeyev
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/R001049/1)
- Anna Zhuravskaya
- Eugene V Makeyev
European Regional Development Fund (ASTRA 2014-2020.4.01.16-0032)
- Jürgen Tuvikene
- Eli-Eelika Esvald
- Annela Avarlaid
- Tõnis Timmusk
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Copyright
© 2021, Tuvikene et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 2,768
- views
-
- 378
- downloads
-
- 23
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Intronic enhancer region governs transcript-specific Bdnf expression in rodent neurons
eLife 10:e65161.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65161
Further reading
-
- Chromosomes and Gene Expression
Previously, we showed that the germ cell-specific nuclear protein RBMXL2 represses cryptic splicing patterns during meiosis and is required for male fertility (Ehrmann et al., 2019). Here, we show that in somatic cells the similar yet ubiquitously expressed RBMX protein has similar functions. RBMX regulates a distinct class of exons that exceed the median human exon size. RBMX protein-RNA interactions are enriched within ultra-long exons, particularly within genes involved in genome stability, and repress the selection of cryptic splice sites that would compromise gene function. The RBMX gene is silenced during male meiosis due to sex chromosome inactivation. To test whether RBMXL2 might replace the function of RBMX during meiosis we induced expression of RBMXL2 and the more distantly related RBMY protein in somatic cells, finding each could rescue aberrant patterns of RNA processing caused by RBMX depletion. The C-terminal disordered domain of RBMXL2 is sufficient to rescue proper splicing control after RBMX depletion. Our data indicate that RBMX and RBMXL2 have parallel roles in somatic tissues and the germline that must have been conserved for at least 200 million years of mammalian evolution. We propose RBMX family proteins are particularly important for the splicing inclusion of some ultra-long exons with increased intrinsic susceptibility to cryptic splice site selection.
-
- Chromosomes and Gene Expression
To function effectively as an integrated system, the transcriptional and post-transcriptional machineries must communicate through mechanisms that are still poorly understood. Here, we focus on the zinc-finger Sfp1, known to regulate transcription of proliferation-related genes. We show that Sfp1 can regulate transcription either by binding to promoters, like most known transcription activators, or by binding to the transcribed regions (gene bodies), probably via RNA polymerase II (Pol II). We further studied the first mode of Sfp1 activity and found that, following promoter binding, Sfp1 binds to gene bodies and affects Pol II configuration, manifested by dissociation or conformational change of its Rpb4 subunit and increased backtracking. Surprisingly, Sfp1 binds to a subset of mRNAs co-transcriptionally and stabilizes them. The interaction between Sfp1 and its client mRNAs is controlled by their respective promoters and coincides with Sfp1’s dissociation from chromatin. Intriguingly, Sfp1 dissociation from the chromatin correlates with the extent of the backtracked Pol II. We propose that, following promoter recruitment, Sfp1 accompanies Pol II and regulates backtracking. The backtracked Pol II is more compatible with Sfp1’s relocation to the nascent transcripts, whereupon Sfp1 accompanies these mRNAs to the cytoplasm and regulates their stability. Thus, Sfp1’s co-transcriptional binding imprints the mRNA fate, serving as a paradigm for the cross-talk between the synthesis and decay of specific mRNAs, and a paradigm for the dual-role of some zinc-finger proteins. The interplay between Sfp1’s two modes of transcription regulation remains to be examined.
