Agl24 is an ancient archaeal homolog of the eukaryotic N-glycan chitobiose synthesis enzymes

  1. Benjamin H Meyer  Is a corresponding author
  2. Panagiotis S Adam
  3. Ben A Wagstaff
  4. George E Kolyfetis
  5. Alexander J Probst
  6. Sonja V Albers
  7. Helge C Dorfmueller  Is a corresponding author
  1. Environmental Microbiology and Biotechnology (EMB), Aquatic Microbial Ecology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
  2. Division of Molecular Microbiology, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, United Kingdom
  3. Molecular Biology of Archaea, Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, Germany
  4. Group for Aquatic Microbial Ecology, Environmental Microbiology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Chemistry University Duisburg-Essen, Germany
  5. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
  6. Centre of Water and Environmental Research (ZWU), University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany

Abstract

Protein N-glycosylation is a post-translational modification found in organisms of all domains of life. The crenarchaeal N-glycosylation begins with the synthesis of a lipid-linked chitobiose core structure, identical to that in Eukaryotes, although the enzyme catalyzing this reaction remains unknown. Here, we report the identification of a thermostable archaeal β-1,4-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase, named archaeal glycosylation enzyme 24 (Agl24), responsible for the synthesis of the N-glycan chitobiose core. Biochemical characterization confirmed its function as an inverting β-D-GlcNAc-(1→4)-α-D-GlcNAc-diphosphodolichol glycosyltransferase. Substitution of a conserved histidine residue, found also in the eukaryotic and bacterial homologs, demonstrated its functional importance for Agl24. Furthermore, bioinformatics and structural modeling revealed similarities of Agl24 to the eukaryotic Alg14/13 and a distant relation to the bacterial MurG, which are catalyzing the same or a similar reaction, respectively. Phylogenetic analysis of Alg14/13 homologs indicates that they are ancient in Eukaryotes, either as a lateral transfer or inherited through eukaryogenesis.

Editor's evaluation

In this manuscript, Meyer and co-workers further contribute to our understanding of how proteins are modified with carbohydrates on asparagine residues, N-glycosylation. They analyze this in the thermoacidophilic archaea Sulfolobus acidocaldarius and characterize Agl24 as a key player in the N-glycosylation pathway in this organism. These findings advance the glycobiology field and reveal how distinct mechanisms have arisen across evolution to post-translationally modify protein structures.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67448.sa0

Introduction

Asparagine (N)-linked glycosylation is one of the most common co- and post-translational protein modifications found in all three domains of life (Nothaft and Szymanski, 2010; Larkin and Imperiali, 2011; Jarrell et al., 2014). In Eukaryotes, N-glycosylation is evolutionarily highly conserved (Lehle et al., 2006) and it is estimated that more than half of all eukaryotic proteins are glycoproteins (Apweiler et al., 1999; Zielinska et al., 2010). Correct folding and stability of proteins, intra- and extracellular recognition of protein targets and enzymatic activity necessitate N-glycosylation (Varki, 1993; Helenius and Aebi, 2004; Caramelo and Parodi, 2007). Consequently, protein glycosylation is essential for many cellular processes of Eukaryotes. As such, congenital disorders of glycosylation in humans are often lethal or cause severe phenotypes and diseases, including intellectual disability, growth retardation, cardiac anomalies, and early death (Reily et al., 2019). Although it was long thought that N-glycosylation was restricted to Eukaryotes, N-glycosylation pathways have now been characterized in organisms of all domains of life.

The bacterial N-glycosylation processes, which assemble the N-glycan as an intermediated step on a lipid carrier and use an oligosaccharyltransferase (OST) for the transfer of the N-glycan to the target protein, as is has been described for the eukaryotic N-glycosylation, seem to be restricted to Delta- and Epsilon-Proteobacteria. However, also non-lipid-dependent N-glycosylation processes, in which a single nucleotide-activated sugar is directly transferred to a target protein, has also been described in different Bacteria, for example, for Haemophilus influenza (Grass et al., 2010; Whitfield et al., 2017; Nothaft and Szymanski, 2019).

By contrast, all sequenced Archaea possess the N-glycan OST AglB, with the exceptions of Aeropyrum pernix and Methanopyrus kandleri (Jarrell et al., 2014; Nikolayev et al., 2020). The common feature of N-glycosylation is the assembly of an oligosaccharide onto a lipid through the activity of specific glycosyltransferases (GTs), which use either nucleotide- or lipid-activated sugar donors. The assembled lipid-linked oligosaccharide (LLO) is flipped across the cytoplasmic/ER membrane. The glycan is then either enlarged or directly transferred onto a target protein by an OST. Archaeal N-glycosylation displays a mosaic of bacterial and eukaryotic features. Like Bacteria, Archaea use only a single OST subunit, whereas the majority of Eukaryotes require a large complex of distinct OST subunits to transfer the LLO onto the target protein (Wild et al., 2018). The level of complexity of the eukaryotic OST varies across kingdoms; vertebrates require an OST complex of eight subunits, plants and insects of seven, while kinetoplastids, like Trypanosoma brucei or Leishmania major, possess only a single subunit (Kelleher and Gilmore, 2006).

In contrast to Bacteria, which use undecaprenol as the N-glycan lipid carrier, Archaea assemble the N-glycan on dolichol (Dol) identical to Eukaryotes. Archaea also display unique N-glycosylation features, for example, the N-glycan assembly onto Dol-phosphate (Dol-P) in Euryarchaeota, while Crenarchaeota use Dol-pyrophosphate (Dol-PP) as do Eukaryotes (Taguchi et al., 2016).

Currently, more than 15 different archaeal N-glycan structures have been solved (Jarrell et al., 2014; Albers et al., 2017). These archaeal N-glycans display unique structures and sugar compositions. Based on this limited characterization of archaeal N-glycans, it is plausible to assume that Archaea possess an enormous range of structural and composition diverse N-glycans. However, closely related species, for example, in the thermophilic crenarchaeal Sulfolobales family, retain a conserved N-glycan core structure but are differentiated by their terminal sugar residues (Zähringer et al., 2000; Palmieri et al., 2013; van Wolferen et al., 2020). The protein N-glycosylation pathway of Sulfolobus acidocaldarius (order: Sulfolobales) has only been partially characterized. Secreted proteins, such as the cell wall surface-layer (S-layer) protein and motility filament forming protein ArlB, are N-glycosylated with a tribranched hexasaccharide. This N-glycan has the composition: (Glc-β1–4-sulfoquinovoseβ-1–3)(Man α-1–6)(Man α-1–4)GlcNAc-β1–4-GlcNAc-β-Asp (Zähringer et al., 2000; Peyfoon et al., 2010). Interestingly, the N-glycan core structure is composed of a chitobiose (GlcNAc-β1–4-GlcNAc) identical to the core structure of all eukaryotic N-glycans. Members of the Sulfolobales family are the only Archaea reported to display this eukaryotic N-linked chitobiose core structure (Palmieri et al., 2013; van Wolferen et al., 2020). Recently, the characterization of the N-glycan from Pyrobaculum calidifontis, belonging to the Thermoproteales order of the Crenarchaeota, revealed as similar N-glycan chitobiose core structure, with the difference that both GlcNAc are modified with an additional N-acetyl group at the C3 position while the second GlcNAc residue is oxidized to glucoronate (Fujinami et al., 2017).

Based on this eukaryotic N-glycan core structure, it has been suggested that the Sulfolobus N-glycan biosynthesis pathway may be similar to the eukaryotic process (Meyer and Albers, 2013). Indeed, a homolog of the yeast Alg7 enzyme, which initiates eukaryotic N-glycosylation by transferring a GlcNAc-P from UDP-GlcNAc to Dol-P to generate the precursor Dol-PP-GlcNAc, has been identified in S. acidocaldarius as AlgH (Meyer et al., 2017). Not only did this AglH show a similar topology and highly conserved amino acid motifs to Alg7, but also functionally complemented a conditional yeast Alg7 knockout (Meyer et al., 2017). This functional complementation has been first described for the AglH of Methanococcus voltae (Shams-Eldin et al., 2008), which has suggested that AglH initiates the N-glycosylation by transferring GlcNAc-1-P onto Dol-P. However, a biochemical study clearly showed that AglK is responsible for the generation of Dol-P-GlcNAc, on which the N-glycan is assembled (Larkin et al., 2013). This observation agrees that Euryarchaeota build their N-glycans on Dol-P and not on Dol-PP in a similar manner to Crenarchaeaota and Eukaryotes (Taguchi et al., 2016).

Here, we report the identification of the β-1,4-N-acetylglucosaminetransferase Agl24 from S. acidocaldarius, which shows conserved amino acid motifs and apparent structural similarities with the eukaryotic Alg14/13 and bacterial MurG functional homologs. Activity assays along with HPLC, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI), and NMR analyses confirmed the function of Agl24 as catalyzing the second N-glycan biosynthesis step to generate the lipid-linked chitobiose core. Our extensive bioinformatics analyses support the hypothesis that the eukaryotic N-glycosylation pathway originates from an archaeal ancestor.

Results

Identification of a Dol-PP-GlcNAc UDP-GlcNAc GlcNAc GT candidate in S. acidocaldarius

To identify the GT that catalyzes chitobiose biosynthesis step in the N-glycosylation process in S. acidocaldarius, we searched for similar biosynthetic processes to identify potential homologs. The bacterial enzyme MurG transfers a GlcNAc residue from UDP-GlcNAc to the C4 hydroxyl group of MurNAc-(pentapeptide)-PP-undecaprenol to produce the lipid-linked β-(1,4) disaccharide known as lipid II (Men et al., 1998; Ha et al., 1999). Although MurG does not synthesize chitobiose-like S. acidocaldarius does, the enzyme uses a similar lipid-linked acceptor and an identical sugar donor (UDP-GlcNAc) and therefore presents a valid candidate for evaluation. MurG has been classified in the Carbohydrate Active Enzyme database (http://www.cazy.org/) as a family 28 GT (Lombard et al., 2014). Until now, only a few archaeal organisms possess GT28 family homologs. These organisms include members of the archaeal orders Methanobacteriales and Methanopyrales, which have been described that synthesize pseudomurein as a component of their cell wall structure (Kandler and König, 1978; König et al., 1982; Albers and Meyer, 2011), and Salinadaptatus halalkaliphilus 2447, a recently described member of the Halobacteriales.

Another candidate homolog is the eukaryotic protein complex formed by Alg13 and Alg14 that transfers GlcNAc from UDP-GlcNAc to the C4 hydroxyl of GlcNAc-PP-Dol to produce the β-(1-4) chitobiose core of the eukaryotic N-glycan. Alg13 and Alg14 are classified as GT1 family members but are distantly related to GT28 family enzymes (Lombard et al., 2014). Alg13 and Alg14 form the C- and N-terminal domains, respectively, of a functional heterodimeric GT enzyme; Alg14 contains the acceptor-binding site and the membrane association domain, while Alg13 possesses the UDP-GlcNAc-binding pocket. The interaction of these two enzymes is required for the catalytic activity, as the active site lies in the cavity formed by the two proteins (Bickel et al., 2005; Chantret et al., 2005; Gao et al., 2005). Although members of the GT1 family are prominent in Archaea, until now no GT1 family member has been identified in genomes of Sulfolobales.

As Alg14-13 and MurG use UDP-GlcNAc to GlcNAcylate a lipid-linked sugar acceptor, they represent valid candidates for a bioinformatics search in S. acidocaldarius.

Using the Escherichia coli MurG protein sequence (WP_063074721.1; EC 2.4.1.227) as template for a Delta BLAST search (Boratyn et al., 2012), various homologs were identified in S. acidocaldarius with very low sequence identity of only 10–17% (Supplementary file 1). The anchoring subunit Alg14 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C (NP_009626.1) was used as query for a Delta BLAST homology search but no protein candidate was identified below the e-value threshold of 0.005. However, when either the catalytic subunit Alg13 from S. cerevisiae S288C (NP_011468.1; EC 2.4.1.141) or the fusion of both Alg14 and Alg13 sequences was used as a search model, a single Sulfolobales homolog was identified with 17% sequence identity (Supplementary file 1). In addition, phylogenetic studies indicated similarities of MurG and Alg14/13 with Saci1262 (Lombard, 2016; Cavalier-Smith and Chao, 2020). Thus, the most likely candidate for the β-1,4-N-acetylglucosaminetransferase in Sulfolobales was found to be Saci1262 (Uniprot: Q4J9C3), a hypothetical 327 amino acid long protein.

In contrast to Euryarchaeota, where the genes of the N-glycosylation enzymes are clustered with the OST aglB, clustering of GT genes is uncommon in Crenarchaeota, including Sulfolobales (Kaminski et al., 2013; Nikolayev et al., 2020). Interestingly, the gene saci1262 is located only eight genes downstream of the OST aglB (saci1274) in S. acidocaldarius (Figure 1—figure supplement 1), while the genes coding for identified enzymes involved in the N-glycosylation, for example, aglH (saci0093), agl3 (saci423), and agl16 (saci0807) are distantly scattered across the entire genome.

Detailed bioinformatics comparison of Saci1262 with Alg14/13 and MurG

Sequence and domain comparisons of the eukaryotic Alg13 and Alg14 to MurG and Saci1262 revealed that Alg14 corresponds to the N-terminal part of MurG/Saci1262, while Alg13 resembled the C-terminal part of MurG/Saci1262 (Figure 1A). Both the N-terminal (aa1–152) and C-terminal (aa153–327) parts of Saci1262 showed very low sequence identity to Alg14 and Alg13, with 15% and 16%, respectively. Interestingly, fused homologs of Alg14 and Alg13 have been reported in the Kinetoplastea Leishmania and Trypanosoma, similar to S. acidocaldarius (Averbeck et al., 2007). While a fusion with the reverse domain order was recognized in the Eukaryotes Entamoeba histolytica (Bickel et al., 2005) and Dictyostelium discoideum (Averbeck et al., 2007; Figure 1A). An interesting difference in these proteins from the three domains of life is the presence of an N-terminal transmembrane domain (TMD) in most of eukaryotic Alg14 proteins (aa 5–25), which is missing in the bacterial MurG, archaeal Saci1262-like enzymes, as well as in the Alg13-14 fusion of E. histolytica and D. discoideum. The TMD is predicted to facilitate the association of Alg14 with the ER membrane and to participate in recruitment of Dol-PP-GlcNAc to the membrane (Lu et al., 2012). The introduction of this TMD appears to have emerged later in the evolution of Eukaryotes, and the interaction with the ER or cytoplasmic membrane is not solely dependent on a TMD, as the presence of hydrophobic patches and protein–protein interactions with membrane proteins are also proposed to facilitate this interaction (Ha et al., 2000).

Figure 1 with 2 supplements see all
Comparison of the archaeal Saci1262, bacterial MurG, and eukaryotic Alg14-13.

(A) Simplified comparison of the Alg14-like (darker) or Alg13-like (light color) domain in bacterial MurG (violet), eukaryotic Alg14-13 (gray), and archaeal Saci1262 (orange) homologs. The transmembrane domain is depicted in black. (B) Protein sequences were aligned with Clustal Omega (Sievers and Higgins, 2018) (for the full alignment, see Figure 1—figure supplement 2). Sequences derived from (i) three bacterial (violet background) MurGs: Escherichia coli (C4ZRI5), Streptococcus pyogenes (Q1J5S6), and Bacillus subtilis (P37585); (ii) eukaryotic (gray background) Alg14-13: Leishmania major (Q4Q7Q3), an artificial Alg14-13 fusion from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (P38242-P53178) and Homo sapiens (Q96F25-Q9NP73-2); (iii) the crenarchaeal (orange background) Saci1264 homologs: Ignicoccus hospitalis (A8ABI4), Pyrodictium occultum (A0A0V8RRP5), Hyperthermus butylicus (A2BMN2), Desulfurococcus amylolyticus (B8D4 × 8), Staphylothermus marinus (A3DMX3), Metallosphaera sedula (A4YH37), Sulfurisphaera tokodaii (Q973C9), Sulfolobus acidocaldarius (Q4J9C3), Acidianus brierleyi (A0A2U9IGN7), and Saccharolobus solfataricus (Q97VW9). Selected sequences from pseudomurein producing Euryarchaeota with higher sequence similarity to the MurG are aligned (turquoise background): Methanopyrus kandleri (Q8TYD0), Methanothermus fervidus (E3GWY2), Methanobacterium formicicum (A0A089ZDB2), Methanothermobacter marburgensis (D9PUE1). Conserved amino acids (65% threshold) are highlighted in color corresponding to the amino acids: G, S, T, P (orange), K, R, H (red), F, W,Y (blue), A, D, E, C, Q, N (black), and V, L, I, M (green). The end of the Alg14-like domain and start of Alg13-like domains are indicated by the change from dark to light background color. (C) MurG (PDB: 3s2u; shown as ribbon) bound to UDP-GlcNAc (shown as sticks, green carbon, blue nitrogen, red oxygen) and orientation toward the cell membrane (bottom). The Alg13-like domain (light violet) and Alg14-like domain (dark violet) are labelled. Conserved His and Glu residues in Alg14 are shown as red sticks. (D) Strict consensus (65%) and Weblogo from the sequence alignment shown in (B). Bar heights correspond to the observed frequency, highly conserved motifs or amino acids are enlarged below, including conserved motifs G(x)GGH15 (Loop I) and E114 (for the full Weblogo, see Figure 1—figure supplement 2).

The amino acid sequence alignment of the representative bacterial MurG, eukaryotic Alg14-13, and archaeal homologs revealed conservation of specific patches and individual residues (Figure 1B and D). The overall topology of Saci1262 is identical to MurG, which consists of two domain folds separated by a deep cleft corresponding to a GT-B fold structure (Ha et al., 2000; Hu et al., 2003; Figure 1C). Despite the low sequence identity, a similar structural topology of Saci1262 to Alg14-13 and MurG was not surprising, as GTs in general showed only a limited number of structural folds. GTs mainly possessed a GT-A or GT-B fold, whereas OSTs and a number of recently characterized GTs displayed a GT-C, GT-D, or GT-E fold, respectively (Mestrom et al., 2019). Crystal structures of the bacterial MurG (PDB:3s2U, 1F0K, 1NLM) and the C-terminal half of the eukaryotic Alg13 (PDB:2jzc) showed typical GT-B structural characteristics (Ha et al., 2000; Hu et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2008; Raman et al., 2010; Brown et al., 2013; Figure 2). The N-terminal part of Alg13 contains a Rossmann-like fold with a mixed parallel and antiparallel β-sheet rather than the conventional Rossmann fold found in all GT-B enzymes, indicating a unique topology among GTs (Wang et al., 2008). The N-terminal helix of Alg14 and MurG is proposed to be the membrane association domain (Chantret et al., 2005; Lu et al., 2012). We have generated a Saci1262 structural model to investigate potential features via SWISS-MODEL (Waterhouse et al., 2018), which is in agreement with the model obtained from AlphaFold (Jumper et al., 2021; Figure 2, doi.org/10.7910/DVN/9KSWQR). Previous studies have compared the structures of MurG and Alg13, including a model for Alg14 (Gao et al., 2008). The formation of the Alg14-Alg13 complex is mediated by a short C-terminal α-helix of Alg13 in cooperation with the last three amino acids of Alg14 (Gao et al., 2008). In the Alg13 crystal structure, this C-terminal helix associates with itself, as Alg14 is missing. The orientation is predicted to be similar to the linker in MurG and the change is indicated by the black arrow (in Figure 2A; Gao et al., 2008). The structural model of Saci1262 is also predicted to contain a C-terminal helix, which interacts with the N-terminal part of the protein Figure 2A.

Figure 2 with 1 supplement see all
Structural comparison of the eukaryotic and bacterial homologs of the archaeal Saci1262.

(A) Structural comparison of the eukaryotic Alg13 (PDB:2ks6) with a structural model of Alg14, the bacterial MurG (PDB: 3s2u), and the structural model of the crenarchaeal Saci1262 (archaeal glycosylation enzyme 24 [Agl24]). Structural models were built with SWISS-MODEL (Waterhouse et al., 2018). Detailed results are listed in Supplementary file 2. The interactions of the N-terminal helices with the membrane are depicted with a yellow background. (B) Magnified and 90° rotated view into the active site of MurG (PDB: 3s2u) in complex with UDP-GlcNAc (sticks). The catalytic site is located in the cleft of both domains, with conserved H15 and E122 residues shown in sticks with green carbon, red oxygen, and blue nitrogen atoms.

We discovered a conserved GGxGGH14 motif (Saci1262) within the N-terminal sequences of MurG, Alg14, and Saci1262-like proteins (Figure 1D, Figure 1—figure supplement 2, and Figure 2B). This motif has been described in MurG sequences in an extended form (G13GTGGHX2PXLAXAX2LX9G39) (Crouvoisier et al., 2007). The conserved amino acids are located in the cavity between the two different structural domains next to the substrate-binding pocket. The crystal structure of MurG (PDB: 3s2u) in complex with UDP-GlcNAc shows the close proximity of the sugar donor to the conserved residues (Figure 2B; Brown et al., 2013). In proximity to the GGxGGH14 motif is the conserved glutamic acid (E114) (Figure 1D, Figure 1—figure supplement 2, and Figure 2B). The two conserved residues H14 and E114 are absent in the archaeal MurG-like GT28 family homologs of known pseudomurein-producing Archaea. Instead, aspartic acid (D) and leucine (L) are more frequently found replacing the H14 and E114 (Figure 1D and Figure 1—figure supplement 2). We propose that these residues might be required to accommodate the different sugar N-acetyltalosaminuronic acid of the lipid-linked acceptor molecule in the pseudomurein biosynthesis process.

The Saci1262 gene is essential in S. acidocaldarius

Due to the overall low sequence similarity of Saci1262 to Alg14-13 and MurG, we attempted to demonstrate the predicted function of Saci1262 in vivo by generating a deletion mutant of saci1262 in the genome of S. acidocaldarius. This deletion mutant should arrest the N-glycosylation process after the generation of Dol-PP-GlcNAc and should contain either non-glycosylated glycoproteins or N-glycosylated proteins containing only a single GlcNAc residue linked to the asparagine in the conserved N-glycosylation motif. The genomic integration by homologous recombination of the plasmid pSVA1312 via either the up- or downstream region of the saci1262 and the selection pyrEF genes was confirmed by PCR (Figure 2—figure supplement 1A). However, we were not successful in generating the marker-less in-frame saci1262 deletion mutant. An alternative approach was conducted aiming at deleting the saci1262 gene by a single homologous recombination step by the integration of the pyrEF selection cassette. All attempts to generate this gene disruption mutant failed. This strongly suggests that the saci1262 gene is essential in S. acidocaldarius, at least under the conditions tested. To exclude that the other GTs, identified in the bioinformatic homology search (Table S1), are involved in the N-glycosylation, marker-less deletion mutants of saci1907, saci1921, saci0807, saci1094, saci1201, saci1821, and Saci1249 were successfully generated. Only the deletion of saci0807, which has been characterized to encode the GT Agl16 that transfers the terminal glucose residue to the N-glycan (Meyer et al., 2013), showed a significant effect on the N-glycosylation of the S-layer proteins. Since we have previously shown that N-glycosylation is essential in Sulfolobus, and saci1262 the only candidate gene is which is essential, our data suggested that the protein encoded by saci1262 is potentially the second enzyme synthesizing the N-glycosylation chitobiose core.

Saci1262 transfers a single GlcNAc residue onto a GlcNAc pyrophosphate-linked acceptor molecule

In agreement with the observed membrane association in S. acidocaldarius (Figure 3—figure supplement 1), Saci1262 was also found in the membrane fraction during its purification from E. coli. Recombinant Saci1262, produced in E. coli (Figure 3—figure supplement 2), was assayed to test the function of Saci1262 using the predicted nucleotide sugar donor UDP-GlcNAc and two synthetic acceptor substrates designed to mimic the native lipid-linked acceptor: C13H27-PP-GlcNAc (acceptor-1) or phenyl-O-C11H22-PP-GlcNAc (acceptor-2) (Figure 3A and C). The reaction products were purified and characterized. The MALDI-MS spectra obtained confirmed that Saci1262 transfers a single GlcNAc to both acceptor substrates when incubated with UDP-GlcNAc (Figure 3B and D). The Saci1262 assay revealed a shift of the peaks by 203 Da to m/z = 811 [M-1H + 2Na]+ and m/z = 833 [M-2H + 3Na]+ (Figure 3B), which corresponded to the addition of one dehydrated GlcNAc (203 Da). The same shift was observed for acceptor-2 (Figure 3D). With an extended reaction time, no additions of a further GlcNAc by Saci1262 could be detected. We also investigated Saci1262 promiscuity toward utilizing UDP-glucose as the sugar donor, but no mass shift was observed (Figure 3E), indicating that Saci1262 uses exclusively UDP-GlcNAc. Based on the confirmed function of Saci1262 as a GT, we named the protein as archaeal glycosylation enzyme 24 (Agl24), in agreement with the general naming procedure of N-glycosylation pathway components in Archaea (Eichler et al., 2013).

Figure 3 with 3 supplements see all
Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS) spectra of the in vitro Saci1262 reaction assessing the N-acetylglucosaminetransferase activity.

Spectra obtained from the enzymatic reactions containing Saci1262-GFP and (A) acceptor-1, (B) acceptor-1 and UDP-GlcNAc, and Saci1262-GFP, (C) acceptor-2, (D) acceptor-2, and UDP-GlcNAc, (E) acceptor-2 and UDP-Glc. The conversion from acceptor-1 (608 m/z [M-1H + 2Na]+ and 630 m/z [M-2H + 3Na]+) or acceptor-2 (672 m/z [M-1H + 2Na]+ and 694 m/z [M-2H + 3Na]+) to the product (811 m/z [M-1H + 2Na]+ and 833 m/z [M-2H + 3Na]+) or (875 m/z [M-1H + 2Na]+ and 897 m/z [M-2H + 3Na]+) was observed only when UDP-GlcNAc was used as nucleotide sugar donor.

Activity of Agl24

Since S. acidocaldarius is a thermophilic microorganism, with an optimal growth temperature of 75°C (Brock et al., 1972), the temperature dependency of the Agl24 activity was investigated using our established mass spectrometry assay. The substrates are stable at the conditions tested and MALDI analysis of the negative control lacking the enzyme revealed only the acceptor-1 mass (Figure 4A). At elevated temperatures, the peak intensity from the product increased while the peak intensity of the acceptor molecule was reduced (Figure 4B–F). Highest activity was detected at 70°C, close to the optimal growth temperature of S. acidocaldarius. Furthermore, the addition of EDTA did not affect the activity of Agl24, demonstrating that Agl24 is a metal-independent GT (Figure 5, Figure 5—figure supplement 1). This result agrees with the lack of a conserved Asp-X-Asp (DxD) motif in the Agl24 sequence, which has been shown to be important to coordinate the metal ions in A-fold GTs, whereas GT-B GTs are metal ion-independent (Lairson et al., 2008; Gloster, 2014).

Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS) spectra of the in vitro archaeal glycosylation enzyme 24 (Agl24) reaction at different temperatures.

Spectra obtained from the purified enzymatic reaction mix with only acceptor-1 (A), acceptor-1, UDP-GlcNAc, and Agl24-GFP wild-type (WT) at 30°C (B), 40°C (C), 50°C (D), 60°C (E), and 70°C (F). Conversion of the acceptor-1 (608 m/z [M-1H + 2Na] and 630 m/z [M-2H + 3Na]) toward the product (811 m/z [M-1H + 2Na] and 833 m/z [M-2H + 3Na]) is dependent on the applied temperature. Above 50°C, the increase in the level of the product at the expense of the level of the acceptor is clearly visible.

Figure 5 with 1 supplement see all
Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS) spectra of the in vitro archaeal glycosylation enzyme 24 (Agl24) reaction, the generated point mutations H14A and E114A and EDTA control.

Spectra obtained from the purified enzymatic reaction mix with acceptor-1 (608 m/z [M-1H + 2Na] and 630 m/z [M-2H + 3Na]), UDP-GlcNAc and (A) Agl24-GFP wild-type (WT), (B) Agl24-H14A-GFP, (C) Agl24-E114A-GFP, and (D) Agl24-GFP WT with addition of 10 mM EDTA. The activity was significantly reduced in the H14A mutants, while a similar amount of product (811 m/z [M-1H + 2Na] and 833 m/z [M-2H + 3Na]) was obtained in the E114A mutant.

Conserved His14 is essential for Agl24 function

Two conserved amino acid residues were targeted by mutagenesis to investigate their role in the Agl24 enzyme. The product where the H14 histidine within the conserved GGH14 motif, found in all Alg14 (GSGGH), MurG (GGxGGH), and Agl24 (GGH) homologs, was replaced by an alanine, was inactive (Figure 5B). This demonstrated that this highly conserved residue, located next to the nucleotide-binding site, is important for enzyme function. This GGxGGH motif and a subsequent second glycine-rich motif (GGY) have been proposed to enable MurG to be involved in an interaction with the diphosphate group of the lipid acceptor, as these two motifs resemble phosphate-binding loops of nucleotide-binding proteins (Baker et al., 1992; Carugo and Argos, 1997). Alanine substitution of the conserved His residue in MurG resulted in undetectable activity and loss of ability to complement a temperature-sensitive MurG mutant (Hu et al., 2003; Crouvoisier et al., 2007). By contrast, the substitution of the conserved residue E114, opposite of the nucleotide-binding site, had no effect on the activity of Agl24 (Figure 5C). In MurG this glutamic acid residue is found in a conserved H124EQN127 motif (E. coli), proposed to coordinate the lipid acceptor (Hu et al., 2003; Crouvoisier et al., 2007). The MurG E125A variant was able to complement the thermosensitive MurG E. coli strain, but the remaining activity was 860-fold lower than that of the wild-type MurG (Crouvoisier et al., 2007).

Agl24 is an inverting β-1,4-N-acetylglucosamine transferase

For a kinetic analysis of Agl24, an HPLC assay was used to monitor the conversion of the mono-GlcNAcylated-PP-lipid acceptor-2 substrate to the bi-GlcNAcylated product (Figure 3—figure supplement 3A, B). A Km value for acceptor-2 could not be determined using this system, due to significant substrate inhibition above 0.5 mM, however, a Km(app) for UDP-GlcNAc was determined: (UDP-GlcNAc)Km = 1.37 ± 0.13 mM, Vmax = 32.5 ± 0.9 pmol min–1. These results agree with the Km values of other GT enzymes, which typically exhibit Km affinities for their respective nucleotide sugars in the high micromolar range, reflecting the estimated intracellular concentrations of the nucleotide sugar (Varki et al., 1999). A 1H NMR analysis confirmed that the enzymatic product contained two GlcNAc residues with different linkage types based on the presence of two differently coupled anomeric protons (Figure 6 and Figure 6—figure supplement 1). One anomeric proton appeared as a doublet of doublets (5.35 ppm, JH1-H2 = 3.1 Hz, JH1-P = 7.2 Hz), typical of an α-linked GlcNAc residue (Table 1). Another anomeric signal appeared as a doublet with a large J coupling value (4.49 ppm, JH1-H2 = 8.5 Hz), indicative of a β-linked GlcNAc residue. The substrate acceptor-2 contained an α-linked GlcNAc; this strongly suggested the terminal GlcNAc introduced by Agl24 was β-linked. Experiments using 1D total correlation spectroscopy (TOCSY, Figure 6—figure supplement 1) and 2D COSY (Figure 6—figure supplement 2) deciphered the detailed proton signals from each of the two sugar rings. In addition, HSQC experiments (Figure 6—figure supplement 3) were used to assign the identity of each proton and carbon signal. The C4 signal of the α-GlcNAc residue was shifted to 79.6 ppm, strongly suggesting that the terminal β-GlcNAc was linked at this position. This was further supported by a relative increase in the shift of the H4 proton of the α-GlcNAc residue compared to the un-modified acceptor (Zorzoli et al., 2019). Relative shifts of other protons reported for the acceptor aligned with our experimental data. In conclusion, a combination of 1H NMR and 1D and 2D TOCSY, COSY, and HSQC experiments confirmed that Agl24 is an inverting β-1,4-GlcNAc transferase.

Figure 6 with 3 supplements see all
1 H NMR spectra of purified archaeal glycosylation enzyme 24 (Agl24) enzymatic product.

Spectra were acquired in D2O at 293 K on a Bruker AVANCE III HD 500 MHz NMR spectrometer fitted with a 5 mm QCPI cryoprobe. Chemical shifts are reported with respect to the residual HDO signal at δH 4.70 ppm.

Table 1
1H and 13C chemical shifts of the in vitro archaeal glycosylation enzyme 24 (Agl24) reaction product.
Lipid123–89101112, 1413, 1516
1H NMR3.791.511.16–1.261.331.663.986.927.266.92
13C NMR66.830.328.828.728.768.8115.6130.1121.8
α-GlcNAc1’2’3’4’5’6’a6’b
1H NMR5.353.8963.83.583.833.733.57
13C NMR94.2553.657079.6571.6960.15
β-GlcNAc1”2”3”4”5”6”a6”b
1H NMR4.493.643.453.343.383.83.6
13C NMR101.5556.1474.0170.3876.2761.15

The eukaryotic GTs Alg14 and Alg13 are closely related to Asgard homologs

In order to determine the phylogenetic relationship between the eukaryotic N-glycosylation GTs Alg13 and Alg14 with their archaeal and bacterial homologs, an extensive phylogenetic analysis was performed. We reconstructed phylogenies of Alg13/EpsF (Figure 7A) and Alg14/EpsE (Figure 7B) with bacterial MurG sequences as outgroup. Agl24-like homologs form a clade containing Crenarchaeota, Bathyarchaeota, and one Baldrarchaeota (Asgard). These Agl24-like sequences are found in all Crenarchaeota genomes from the orders Fervidicoccales, Acidilobales, Desulfurococcales, and Sulfolobales, but not in members of the order Thermoproteales (Figure 7—figure supplement 1, Figure 7—figure supplement 2, Figure 7—figure supplement 5, and doi.org/10.7910/DVN/9KSWQR). The Bathyarchaeota (14 sequences, mainly from Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB) order o__B26-1) form a strongly supported monophyletic branch within Crenarchaeota (Figure 7—figure supplement 1 and Figure 7—figure supplement 2) resulting from a single lateral transfer event.

Figure 7 with 5 supplements see all
Single gene phylogenies of (A) Alg13/EpsF and (B) Alg14/EpsE homologs.

The phylogenies were rooted using the MurG sequences from the corresponding (Lombard, 2016) datasets as the respective outgroup. Black dots indicate strongly supported branches (ultrafast bootstrap ≥ 95 and aLRT SH-like support ≥ 80). Red dots indicate the position of the minimal ancestor deviation (MAD) outgroup-free root in phylogenies without the MurG outgroup (doi.org/10.7910/DVN/9KSWQR). Clades of interest (archaeal glycosylation enzyme 24 [Agl24]-like containing Saci1262, Asgard lineages, and Eukaryotes) are colored. Taxa names are given according to common usage, with a few exceptions where the Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB) classification was necessary for accuracy. The uncollapsed trees with numerical branch supports are given in Figure 7—figure supplement 1 and Figure 7—figure supplement 2, respectively. The concatenated dataset tree and its uncollapsed version are given in Figure 7—figure supplement 3 and Figure 7—figure supplement 4, respectively.

The sister clade of Agl24 consists of the eukaryotic Alg13 and Alg14, as well as EpsF-like and EpsE-like sequences from Archaea and Bacteria. With the exception of Perkinsela sp. in Alg13/EpsF, Eukaryotes are monophyletic and form a strongly supported monophyletic branch with an Asgard lineage, Thorarchaeota for Alg13 and Odinarchaeota for Alg14. Other closely related archaeal sequences are mainly from Verstraetearchaeota. These, along with the EpsE/EpsF archaeal sequences (mainly from Euryarchaeota and DPANN) are interspersed with bacterial homologs indicating multiple interdomain transfers. The function of EpsE and EpsF has been studied in Lactobacillales, where these enzymes are involved in exopolysaccharide production (Kolkman et al., 1997; De Vuyst et al., 2001). Similar to Alg14-13, the combined activity of EpsE and EpsF links either a glucose (Glc) from UDP-Glc (Kleerebezem et al., 1999, van Kranenburg et al., 1999), or a galactose (Gal) from UDP-Gal via a β-1,4 linkage to lipid-linked glucose acceptors (van Kranenburg et al., 1999), creating either a lipid-linked cellobiose or a lactose, respectively. As opposed to Agl24 and the other exclusively archaeal clades in our phylogeny, most EpsE/EpsF and Alg14/Alg13-related genes are split. This indicates a single gene split event at the base of that clade, followed by multiple independent re-fusion events across Bacteria, Archaea (e.g., some Thorarchaeota), and Eukaryotes (Kinetoplastids, Amoebozoa; in the latter with gene order inversion).

All other sequences are exclusively archaeal, fused, and form primarily two clades. One clade consists mainly of euryarchaeal methanogens and a couple of DPANN. The distribution in certain lineages (Methanococcales, Methanosarcinales) is wide enough to suggest that their respective ancestors possessed an Alg14-13 homolog. The second clade corresponds to the TACK superphylum (Thaum-, Bathy-, Aig-, Mars-, Geotherm-, Nezha-, Verstraete-, and Korarchaeota). Even though the relationships among lineages are unresolved, an Alg14-13 homolog was most probably present at the ancestor of the TACK supergroup. Among the TACK, there exist sequences from various Asgard lineages that have been acquired from ancient lateral transfers.

A third clade consisting of divergent Thaumarchaeota sequences is either sister to both TACK and Euryarchaeota-DPANN (Alg13/EpsF, Figure 7A) or only the TACK. Although we used only well-established Alg14-13 homologs from Lombard, 2016, in our phylogenies, such divergent homologs (often forming distinct clades) exist across multiple archaeal lineages, including one in Bathyarchaeota (mainly in GTDB genus g__PALSA-986) and two in Methanobacteriales (doi.org/10.7910/DVN/9KSWQR). Some of the Bathyarchaeota and the GTDB o__Thermofilales (NCBI: unclassified Thermoprotei) member B67-G16 in the TACK clade above additionally possess an Agl24. Some Bathyarchaeota MAGs also contain additional sequences from the unused divergent clades (Figure 7—figure supplement 1, Figure 7—figure supplement 2, and doi.org/10.7910/DVN/9KSWQR). Since their N-glycosylation processes are unknown, it is impossible to predict the function and overlap thereof of these homologs.

Outgroup-free rooting with the minimal ancestor deviation (MAD) method (Tria et al., 2017) corroborates the outgroup rooting of the phylogenies with MurG (Figure 7). The bacterial MurG and various (primarily) archaeal Agl24/Alg14-13/EpsEF homologs seem to have originated from a split at the Last Universal Common Ancestor, as previously proposed (Lombard, 2016). Although EpsE/EpsF and Alg14/Alg13-like sequences are found in Bacteria which are ancient in some lineages (EpsE/EpsF in Actinobacteria and Cyanobacteria, see the preliminary phylogenies in doi.org/10.7910/DVN/9KSWQR), these homologs are of archaeal origin and were acquired through ancient interdomain transfers.

Similarly, the respective eukaryotic branches are internally poorly resolved and do not even recover the major clades of that domain, such as Opisthokonts. We cannot reveal if this is purely due to weak phylogenetic signal or horizontal gene transfer events, however, the eukaryotic Alg14-13 are monophyletic and archaeal in origin. One possibility is that they were present in the last eukaryotic common ancestor (LECA), as proposed in Lombard, 2016. The proximity of Asgards to Eykaryotes would suggest that these genes were inherited vertically during eukaryogenesis in a two-domain tree of life (Eme et al., 2017; Williams et al., 2020). The counterargument is that only two Asgard phyla are in the vicinity of Eukaryotes, and neither is Heimdallarchaeota, as would be expected from the literature. Despite our careful analysis, we did not find Alg13- and Alg14-like sequences in most Asgard species, suggesting that if they produce the same type of glycosylation, they could be using a different enzyme for this step of N-glycosylation. The homologs in Wukong-, Baldr-, Borrarchaeota, DTBI01, and a second homolog in Odinarchaeota have been laterally acquired from within the TACK. It is unknown whether the multiple Odinarchaeota genes have overlapping functions. The alternative scenario to eukaryogenesis involves a very ancient interdomain transfer from Archaea to either proto-Eukaryotes or shortly after the LECA. Even if such a history is compatible with both a two- and three-domain tree of life, our phylogenies do not directly support a three-domain tree. Whether with MurG outgroup rooting or MAD outgroup-free rooting, the Eukaryotes emerge from and are not sister to all Archaea.

Discussion

In this study we identified the first archaeal and thermostable β-1,4-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase, named Agl24, responsible for the second synthesis step of the lipid-linked chitobiose on which the N-glycan of S. acidocaldarius is assembled. The reported essentiality of Agl24 is in agreement with the indispensable properties of the OST AglB and AglH, catalyzing the last and first step of the N-glycosylation process in S. acidocaldarius, respectively (Meyer and Albers, 2014; Meyer et al., 2017). The essentiality of the N-glycosylation has also been confirmed by a transposon study in Sulfolobus islandicus, a close relative of S. acidocaldarius, in which all homologous genes, including agl24, lack any transposon insertions (Zhang et al., 2018). However, the fundamental nature of archaeal N-glycosylation cannot be generalized since deletion mutants of the OST AglB can be obtained in Euryarchaeota, for example, in Methanococcus maripaludis and Haloferax volcanii (Chaban et al., 2006; Abu-Qarn et al., 2007). The requirement for N-glycosylation might rely on many factors including the N-glycan composition and structure, as well as the modification frequency on proteins; this frequency is reported to be higher in thermophilic, compared to mesophilic, Archaea (Meyer and Albers, 2013; Jarrell et al., 2014).

Comparison of Agl24 with eukaryotic Alg14-13 and the bacterial MurG enzymes revealed structural and amino acid similarities. Although the sequence identity of Agl24 with the eukaryotic and bacterial enzymes is extremely low (~16%), the structural prediction of Agl24 indicated a MurG-like GT-B fold. Interestingly, the amino acids of the nucleotide sugar donor-binding site of MurG (Hu et al., 2003) are not conserved in Agl24 and Alg14, although all enzymes use UDP-GlcNAc as the sugar donor (Figure 1—figure supplement 2, boxed). Strikingly, a conserved GGH14 motif within an N-terminal loop of MurG, Alg14-13, and Agl24 (Figure 1 and Figure 1—figure supplement 2), which protrudes into the cavity formed by the two structural folds, could be identified in Agl24. In Bacteria, this G13GTGGH18 loop is extended by a second G103GY105 loop. As both loops are suggested to be reminiscent of the phosphate-binding loops of nucleotide-binding proteins, their involvement in the binding of the diphosphate group of the acceptor lipid has been proposed (Crouvoisier et al., 2007). In agreement with our results, the alanine substitutions of the invariant bacterial H14 led to an extremely low or undetectable activity of MurG as well as to the loss of the ability to complement a temperature-sensitive MurG mutant (Hu et al., 2003; Crouvoisier et al., 2007). However, up to now, no structure of MurG or Alg14-13 with the bound lipid acceptor molecule has been published and the interaction of the imidazole ring of the histidine residue with the acceptor molecule remains to be shown. Our alignment also reveals a conserved glutamic acid in the bacterial, eukaryotic, and archaeal sequences. In Bacteria, this glutamic acid is found in a conserved H124EQN127 loop (E. coli MurG), which has been proposed to form a key part of the acceptor-binding site (Hu et al., 2003). In agreement with our study, an E125A substitution significantly affected the function of MurG, although a marked decrease in lipid acceptor binding (1760-fold) and nucleotide substrate binding (210-fold) was observed (Hu et al., 2003; Crouvoisier et al., 2007).

The euryarchaeal N-glycosylation processes have been well characterized for different species (reviewed in Jarrell et al., 2014; Albers et al., 2017). The enzymes catalyzing the first and second step, for example, in H. volcanii AglJ and AglG (Yurist-Doutsch et al., 2008; Kaminski et al., 2010) and in M. voltae AglK and AglC (Chaban et al., 2009; Larkin et al., 2013), belong to the GT2 family and possess a GT-A fold. S. acidocaldarius is the only crenarchaeal species for which the N-glycosylation process has been defined, and we revealed that Agl24 is the first archaeal glycosylation enzyme with a predicted GT-B structure. Based on these Agl24 differences to the GT2 family and MurG (GT28, GT-B fold), Agl24 is assigned to the new GT-B fold GT-family 115.

Although lacking a TMD, Agl24 associates with the membrane, indicating an interaction with membrane enzymes, similar to the interaction of MurG or Alg14-13 with their membrane interaction partners MraY and Alg7, respectively. Based on the structural similarities of these complexes, a shared common evolutionary origin of the first enzymes of eukaryotic N-glycosylation and the bacterial peptidoglycan biosynthesis has been hypothesized (Bugg and Brandish, 1994; Burda and Aebi, 1999; Bouhss et al., 2008). As S. acidocaldarius possesses a homolog of Alg7, termed AlgH (Meyer et al., 2017), and a bioinformatics study has indicated that Alg7 might have emerged out of the Crenarchaeota (Lombard, 2016), AglH presents the most likely candidate for being the interaction partner of Agl24.

Our phylogenetic analysis shed light on the distribution of the identified Agl24 in Archaea and determined its relationship with eukaryotic and bacterial homologs suggesting a very ancient and broad distribution of Agl24/Alg14-13/EpsEF-like homologs in Archaea. Importantly, close homologs of Agl24 are only found within the Crenarchaeota, Bathyarchaeota, and one Asgard genome (Baldrarchaeota). Indeed, all Crenarchaeota, except for members of the order Thermoproteales, possess an Agl24 homolog (Figure 7—figure supplement 5), strongly suggesting that they contain a chitobiose N-glycan core structure. By contrast, the N-glycans of members of the Thermoproteales could be synthesized using a different enzyme. The N-glycan of Pyrobaculum caldifontis, belonging to the order Thermoproteales, differs from the N-glycan in Sulfolobales (Fujinami et al., 2017). Its N-glycan core is composed of two di-N-acetylated β-1,4-linked GlcNAc residues with the second sugar being carboxylated at C6 (GlcA(NAc)2-β-1,4-Glc(NAc)2). A di-N-acetylated glucuronic acid sugar is also found in the N-glycan from M. voltae, which is transferred by the GT AglC onto the Dol-P-linked GlcNAc (Chaban et al., 2009). Thus, a homolog of AglC is likely to be involved in the N-glycan biosynthesis in P. caldifontis. The best candidate for an AglC homolog in P. calidifontis is Pcal_0481 showing 29.91% sequence identity. Interestingly, the GT-A fold structure has recently been solved, while the predicted function as a mannosyltransferase could not be experimentally confirmed (Gandini et al., 2020).

Our phylogenetic analysis revealed that the most closely related enzymes to the eukaryotic Alg14 and Alg13 are found within the Asgard superphylum. Since the discovery of the Archaea as the third domain of life along with Bacteria and Eukaryotes (Woese and Fox, 1977), the comparison of archaeal molecular processes, especially those found in Crenarchaeota, has gradually revealed a strong resemblance of the ones found in Eukaryotes (Huet et al., 1983; Zillig et al., 1989; Akıl and Robinson, 2018, Akıl et al., 2020). Furthermore, some recent phylogenomic analyses indicated that Eukaryotes originated close to the TACK superphylum (Thaumarchaeota, Aigarchaeota, Crenarchaeota, and Korarchaeota) within the Asgard superphylum (Petitjean et al., 2014, Raymann et al., 2015; Zaremba-Niedzwiedzka et al., 2017; Williams et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2021) although phylogenies supporting a three-domain tree of life are reported occasionally (Da Cunha et al., 2017). A current hypothesis for the formation of the first eukaryotic cell proposes a membrane protrusion of an ancestral archaeon that engulfed a bacterium to increase the interspecies interaction surface (Baum and Baum, 2014; Imachi et al., 2020). The eukaryotic N-glycosylation would therefore have been inherited from this ancient archaeal ancestor, which is in agreement with the high conservation of the initial N-glycosylation biosynthesis steps in all eukaryotes (Helenius and Aebi, 2004; Samuelson et al., 2005; Schwarz and Aebi, 2011). In addition, AglB in members of the Asgard and TACK superphyla shows considerable similarity to its eukaryotic homologue Stt3, and is clearly distinct from the AglB of the DPANN superphylum and the Euryarchaeota (Nikolayev et al., 2020). Most eukaryotic Stt3 contain a double sequon motif for N-glycosylation near the substrate-binding site, which is hypothesized to contribute to the LLO (Wild et al., 2018; Shrimal and Gilmore, 2019). Interestingly, this double sequon is also present in the AglB of the members of the Asgard and TACK superphyla but absent in the AglB of Euryarchaeota (Shrimal and Gilmore, 2019). Moreover, homologs of non-catalytic subunits of the eukaryotic Stt3 complex, for example, ribophorin, Ost3/6, Ost5, and Wbp1, have been detected in some Asgard (Zaremba-Niedzwiedzka et al., 2017). However, their specific function in the N-glycosylation has to be shown, especially as ribophorin is only found in mammals (Wilson and High, 2007) and is therefore unlikely to have existed in early Eukaryotes. Nevertheless, the assembly of the N-glycan linkage in the TACK superphylum is conducted via a pyrophosphate linkage to the Dol (Taguchi et al., 2016), identical to that in Eukaryotes. This contrasts with Euryarchaeota, which use a monophosphate linkage. A summary of the similarities and differences of the archaeal N-glycosylation to Eukaryotes and Bacteria is given in Supplementary file 4. All these observations strengthen the hypothesis that the eukaryotic N-glycosylation has emerged from an ancient archaeon. However, an origin of the eukaryotic Alg14-13 through eukaryogenesis cannot be unambiguously demonstrated. Due to the sparse distribution of Alg14-13 homologs among Asgards, incongruences in the phylogenies of the two proteins (Figure 7), and poor resolution within Eukaryotes (Figure 7—figure supplement 1 and Figure 7—figure supplement 2), it is possible that these components of eukaryotic N-glycosylation originated from an ancient lateral transfer. It is also noteworthy that there exists a multitude of distant Alg14-13 homologs throughout Archaea. Even though in our analysis we relied on well-established clades, primarily due to their evolutionary proximity to Agl24 and Eukaryotes, there are additional clades other than the Asgards worth exploring in the future, such as the ones in Bathyarchaeota and Methanobacteriales (doi.org/10.7910/DVN/9KSWQR). Many Bathyarchaeota have multiple Alg14-13 homologs, which suggest some functional redundancy. Methanobacteriales use pseudomurein, which raises the question why do they contain these homologs.

The homologs of eukaryotic GTs in members of the TACK and Asgard superphyla are very useful tools to study the structure and the functional relationship of the elusive eukaryotic enzymes. In particular, S. acidocaldarius, as one of the few genetically treatable archaea, produces thermostable GTs, that allow detailed enzymatic and structural characterization.

Materials and methods

Strains and growth conditions

Request a detailed protocol

The strain S. acidocaldarius MW001 (ΔpyrE) (Wagner et al., 2012) and all derived modified strains (Supplementary file 3) were grown in Brock medium at 75°C, pH 3, adjusted using sulfuric acid. The medium was supplemented with 0.1% w/v NZ-amine and 0.1% w/v dextrin as carbon and energy source (Brock et al., 1972). Selection gelrite (0.6%) plates were supplemented with the same nutrients, with the addition of 10 mM MgCl2 and 3 mM CaCl2. For the second selection plates, 10 mg mL–1 uracil and 100 mg mL–1 5-fluoroorotic acid were added. For the growth of the uracil auxotrophic mutants, 10 mg mL–1 uracil was added to the medium. Cell growth was monitored by measuring the optical density at 600 nm. Protein expression in S. acidocaldarius was conducted in medium supplemented with 0.1% w/v NZ-amine and 0.1% w/v L-arabinose as carbon and energy source. All E. coli strains, DH5α, BL21, or ER1821, were grown in LB media at 37°C in a shaking incubator at 200 rpm. According to the antibiotic resistance in the transformed vector(s), media were supplemented with the antibiotics carbenicillin (amp) at 100 μg mL–1 and/or kanamycin (kan) at 50 μg mL–1.

Construction of deletion plasmids

Request a detailed protocol

The predicted function of agl24 was verified via the generation of the lipid-linked chitobiose core of the N-glycan. Therefore, a marker-less deletion mutant of this gene was constructed in S. acidocaldarius MW001, as previously described (Wagner et al., 2012). Used primers and generated plasmid are given in Supplementary file 3, the strain MW001, auxotrophic for uracil biosynthesis, was transformed with the plasmid pSVA1312. Therefore, two ~1000 bp DNA fragments, one from the upstream and one from the downstream regions of agl24 (saci1262) gene, were PCR amplified. Restriction sites ApaI and BamHI were introduced at the 5′ ends of the upstream forward primer (4168) and of the downstream reverse primer (4165), respectively. The upstream reverse primer (4163) and the downstream forward primer (4164) were each designed to incorporate 15 bp of the reverse complement strand of the other primer, resulting in a 30 bp overlap stretch. The overlapping PCR fragments were purified, digested with ApaI and BamHI, and ligated in the digested plasmid pSVA407, containing pyrEF (Wagner et al., 2012).

Generation of a linear Agl24up-pyrEF-Agl24down fragment for the direct agl24::pyrEF replacement

Request a detailed protocol

To further underline the essential role of agl24 in S. acidocaldarius, a disruption of the agl24 gene by direct homologous integration of the pyrEF cassette was performed. For this approach, 387 bp of the agl24 upstream region, the full 1525 bp of the pyrEF cassette, and 1011 bp of the agl24 downstream region were PCR amplified using the primers: 4168 + 6336, 4115 + 4116, and 6337 + 6338, respectively. At the 5′ ends of the upstream forward primer (4168) and of the downstream reverse primer (6338) restriction sites ApaI and BamHI were introduced, respectively. The pyrEF forward primer (4115) was designed to incorporate 40 bp of the upstream reverse primer (6336) resulting in a 40 bp overlapping stretch. The pyrEF reverse primer (4116) and the downstream forward primer (6337) were designed to incorporate the reverse complement strand of the other primer, resulting in a 46 bp overlapping stretch. The upstream, pyrEF, and downstream fragments were fused by an overlapping PCR, using the 3′ ends of each fragment as primers. The 2904 bp overlap PCR fragment gained, was amplified using the outer primers (4168 and 6338), digested with ApaI and BamHI, and ligated into the p407 vector predigested with the same restriction enzymes. The resulting plasmid, pSVA3338 (agl24up-pyrEF-agl24down), was used to transform E. coli DH5α and selected on LB-plates containing 50 mg mL–1 ampicillin. The accuracy of the plasmid was verified by sequencing. Before transformation in S. acidocaldarius, the plasmid was digested with ApaI and BamHI to create the linear agl24up-pyrEF-agl24down fragment.

Generation of Agl24 expression plasmids for the production of Agl24 in S. acidocaldarius and E. coli

Request a detailed protocol

Cellular localization studies were carried out using N- and C-terminal fusion proteins of Agl24. The agl24 gene was amplified from genomic DNA of S. acidocaldarius introducing NcoI and PstI restriction sites at the 5′ ends of the primers 4176 and 4177, respectively. The PCR fragment was cloned into pSVA1481, yielding vector pSVA1336 containing an inducible arabinose promoter and agl24-strep-his10. The plasmid was digested with NcoI and EagI and the insert agl24-strep-his10 was ligated into pSVA1481 containing an inducible maltose promoter, yielding pSVA1337. The N-terminal strep-his10-tev-agl24 was cloned using the primer pair 4180 and 4181, which incorporated the restriction sites NcoI and NotI, respectively. The insert was ligated into pSVA2301 containing an inducible maltose promoter yielding pSVA1339.

For heterologous expression of agl24 in E. coli, the plasmid pHD0499 was generated. The GFP-His8-tagged agl24 gene was constructed by amplifying the full-length agl24 gene from S. acidocaldarius genomic DNA with the primer pair A596 and A597. The PCR fragment was cloned in-frame into the vector pWaldo (Waldo et al., 1999) using XhoI and KpnI restriction sites, generating a C-terminal fusion with a TEV cleavage site, GFP, and His8 tag. For the generation of Agl24 mutants of the conserved mutants H15 and E114, a quick-change mutagenesis PCR was applied using the primers: A597 and A684 or A685 and A686, respectively.

Transformation and selection of the deletion mutant in S. acidocaldarius

Request a detailed protocol

Generation of competent cells was performed based on the protocol of Kurosawa and Grogan, 2005. Briefly, S. acidocaldarius strain MW001 was grown to an OD600 between 0.1 and 0.3 in Brock medium supplemented with 0.1% w/v NZ-amine and 0.1% dextrin. Cooled cells were harvested by centrifugation (2000× g at 4°C for 20 min). The cell pellet was washed three times successively in 50, 10, and 1 mL of ice-cold 20 mM sucrose (dissolved in demineralized water) after mild centrifugation steps (2000× g at 4°C for 20 min). The final cell pellet was resuspended in 20 mM sucrose at an OD600 of 10.0 and stored in 50 µL aliquots at –80°C; 400–600 ng of methylated pSVA1312 or the linearized Agl24up-pryEF-Agl24down fragment were added to a 50 µL aliquot of competent MW001 cells and incubated for 5 min on ice before transformation in a 1 mm gap electroporation cuvette at 1250 V, 1000 Ω, 25 mF using a Bio-Rad gene pulser II (Bio-Rad, Plano, TX). Directly after transformation, 50 µL of a 2× concentrated recovery solution (1% sucrose, 20 mM β-alanine, 20 mM malate buffer pH 4.5, 10 mM MgSO4) were added to the sample and incubated at 75°C for 30 min under mild shaking conditions (150 rpm). Before plating, the sample was mixed with 100 µL of heated 2× concentrated recovery solution and twice 100 µL were spread onto gelrite plates containing Brock medium supplemented with 0.1% NZ-amine and 0.1% dextrin. After incubation for 5–7 days at 75°C, large brownish colonies were used to inoculate 50 mL of Brock medium containing 0.1% NZ-amine and 0.1% dextrin, which were incubated for 3 days at 78°C. Cultures confirmed by PCR to contain the genomically integrated plasmid were grown in Brock medium supplemented with 0.1% NZ-amine and 0.1% dextrin to an OD of 0.4. Aliquots of 40 µL were spread on second selection plates, supplemented with 0.1% NZ-amine and 0.1% dextrin and 10 mg mL–1 uracil, were incubated for 5–7 days at 78°C. Newly formed colonies were streaked on fresh second selection plates to ensure single colony selection before each colony was screened by PCR for the genomic absence, presence, or modification of the agl24 gene.

Expression of Agl24 in S. acidocaldarius

Request a detailed protocol

Plasmid transformation of S. acidocaldarius cells was performed as described above for the deletion mutants. Cells were spread onto gelrite plates containing Brock medium supplemented with 0.1% NZ-amine and 0.1% dextrin. After incubation for 5–7 days at 75°C, large brownish colonies were used to inoculate 50 mL of Brock medium containing 0.1% NZ-amine and 0.1% dextrin and incubated for 3 days at 78°C. Presence of the expression plasmid was confirmed by PCR. For induction of expression the strains were grown either in Brock medium supplemented with either 0.1% NZ-amine and 0.1% dextrin (MALpromotor) or with 0.1% NZ-amine and 0.1% L-arabinose (ARApromotor) to an OD600 of 1.0.

Expression and purification of recombinant Agl24 protein from E. coli

Request a detailed protocol

For heterologous Agl24 protein expression, 6 × 1 L LB medium was inoculated with 10 mL from an overnight BL21 culture previously transformed with pHD0499. Cells were grown at 16°C overnight in auto-induction medium (Studier, 2014) containing 30 µg mL–1 kanamycin. The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 4200× g for 25 min and used to isolate the membrane fractions. All subsequent purification steps were carried out at 4°C. Cells were fractionated by passing four times through an Avestin C3 High Pressure Homogeniser (Biopharma, UK), followed by a 20 min low speed spin at 4000× g. The resulting supernatant was centrifuged at 200,000× g for 2 hr to obtain the membrane fraction and 2–3 g of membranes were routinely used for isolation of Agl24-GFP-His8 proteins. Samples were solubilized in 18 mL Buffer 1 (500 mM NaCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 1.8 mM KH2PO4 2.7 mM KCl, pH 7.4, 20 mM imidazole, 4 mM TCEP) with the addition of 1% n-dodecyl-β-maltoside (DDM) for 2 hr at 4°C. The sample was twofold diluted with Buffer 1 and centrifuged at 200,000× g for 2 hr. The supernatant was loaded onto a Ni-Sepharose 6 Fast Flow (GE Healthcare) column with 1 mL of prewashed Ni-NTA-beads. The column was washed with 20 mL of wash buffer (500 mM NaCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 1.8 mM KH2PO4 2.7 mM KCl, pH 7.4, 20 mM imidazole, 0.4 mM TCEP, 0.03% DDM) and eluted with 5 × 1 mL elution buffer (500 mM NaCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 1.8 mM KH2PO4 2.7 mM KCl, pH 7.4, 250 mM imidazole, 0.4 mM TCEP, 0.03% DDM). Elution fractions were combined, and imidazole was removed using a HiPrep 26/10 desalting column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with the following Buffer (1× PBS, 0.03% DDM, 0.4 mM TCEP). Protein concentration was determined using a Bradford reaction (Bio-Rad) and purity was confirmed by SDS-PAGE analysis. The concentrated fractions were separated by SDS-PAGE and stained with Coomassie blue. Protein identity was confirmed by tryptic peptide mass fingerprinting, and the level of purity and molecular weight of the recombinant protein was determined by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF). The analysis was provided by the University of Dundee ‘Fingerprints’ Proteomics Facility.

Agl24 activity

Request a detailed protocol

Activity was measured in 100 µL reaction volume containing 1 mM UDP-D-GlcNAc, 1 mM acceptor molecule, 5 mM MgCl2, and 5 µg of purified Agl24 in TBS Buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6). The reaction was performed in a PCR cycler at 60 °C for 12 hr.

MS analysis

Request a detailed protocol

MALDI-TOF was used to analyze the acceptors and products of the Agl24 in vitro assay. At least three repeats were performed, where 100 μL reaction samples were purified over 100 mg Sep-Pak C18 cartridges (Waters) pre-equilibrated with 5% EtOH. The bound samples were washed with 800 µL of H2O and 800 µL of 15% EtOH, eluted in two fractions with (1) 800 µL of 30% EtOH and (2) 800 µL of 60% EtOH. The two elution fractions were dried in a SpeedVac vacuum concentrator and resuspended in 20 µL of 50% MeOH. A 1 µL sample was mixed with 1 µL of 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid matrix (15 mg mL–1 in 30:70 acetonitrile, 0.1% TFA), and 1 µL was added to the MALDI grid. Samples were analyzed by MALDI in an Autoflex Speed mass spectrometer set up in reflection positive ion mode (Bruker, Germany).

HPLC analysis

Request a detailed protocol

With the exception of kinetics reactions, which are detailed below, Agl24 reactions were analyzed using an HPLC assay with, typically, 50 µL samples containing 2.5 mM UDP-GlcNAc, 1.5 mM lipid acceptor, and 1.8 µg of purified Agl24 in a TBS buffer containing 5 mM MgCl2 (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5). Reactions were left at 60°C (or alternative temperatures) for the desired time and quenched with one equivalent of acetonitrile to precipitate Agl24. Following filtration to remove precipitate, reactions were injected onto an XBridge BEH Amide OBD Prep column (130 Å, 5 µM, 10 × 250 mm) at a flow rate of 4 mL min–1 using a Dionex UltiMate 3000 system (Thermo Scientific) fitted with a UV detector optimized to detect the O-phenyl functional group of the acceptor molecule at 270 nm. Each run was 35 min using running Buffer A (95% acetonitrile, 10 mM ammonium acetate, pH 8) and Buffer B (50% acetonitrile, 10 mM ammonium acetate, pH 8). A linear gradient from 20% to 80% Buffer B was performed over 20 min, followed by an immediate drop back to 20% Buffer B for the remaining 15 min of the run to re-equilibrate the column to starting conditions. The Agl24 reaction substrates and products typically eluted 8–11 min into a run. For kinetic analyses, assays were performed in triplicate (with the exception of 1 mM concentration which was only performed in duplicate) and altered to contain a fixed concentration of lipid acceptor (0.5 mM) while varying the concentration of UDP-GlcNAc (0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 3, 6, 9, 12 mM). Reactions were run for 10 hr before being quenched and, after completion, areas of substrate and product peaks were calculated to determine the reaction conversion. Conversion over 10 hr was converted to pmol per minute, and the resulting data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism v8 to generate a Michaelis–Menten curve and the resulting kinetic data.

NMR analysis

Request a detailed protocol

The HPLC-purified Agl24 products from three to five reactions each (0.5–2 mg) were combined and dried using a Christ RVC 2–25 speed vacuum fitted with a Christ CT 02–50 cold-trap to remove excess acetonitrile, then freeze dried (Alpha 1–2 LDplus, Christ) to remove residual water. Products were subsequently dissolved in 600 µL of D2O and NMR spectra were recorded at 293 K. The spectra were acquired on a Bruker AVANCE III HD 500 MHz NMR Spectrometer equipped with a 5 mm QCPI cryoprobe. For 1D TOCSY experiments, H1’ was irradiated at 5.35 ppm, H2’ was irradiated at 3.90 ppm, and H1” was irradiated at 4.49 ppm (Figure 6—figure supplement 1). A combination of 1H 1H COSY, 1D TOCSY, and 1H 13C HSQC experiments were used to fully assign the 1H and 13C signals for the Agl24 reaction product. Full 1H and 13C chemical shift assignments can be found in Table 1 and are recorded with respect to the residual HDO signal at 4.7 ppm.

BLAST searches and homology modeling of Saci1262

Request a detailed protocol

To identify homologs of MurG (WP_063074721.1), Alg13 (NP_011468.1), Alg14 (NP_009626.1), and Alg14-13 fusion (NP_009626.1 + NP_011468.1) in S. acidocaldarius, a DELTA BLAST (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) was performed with the standard parameters (Boratyn et al., 2012). Homology modeling of Saci1262 (Agl24) was performed on the SWISS-MODEL server (Waterhouse et al., 2018) with default parameters.

The obtained sequences of the MurG, Alg14-14, and Saci1262 homologs were alignment with Clustal Omega (Sievers and Higgins, 2018) with standard parameter and visualized with Geneious Prime 2020 (Biomatters, Ltd. New Zealand) with an amino acids conservation threshold of 65%.

Phylogenetic analyses

Request a detailed protocol

To search for homologs of Alg14-13 in Archaea, Bacteria, and Eukaryotes, we constructed a local database for each domain. The Archaea database (2424 genomes) contained all representative genomes from GTDB r202 (Parks et al., 2022), plus the Asgard genomes from Liu et al., 2021 (NCBI BioProject identifier PRJNA680430). We downloaded them as nucleotide contigs with ncbi-genome-download (https://github.com/kblin/ncbi-genome-download; (Meyer, 2021 copy archived at swh:1:rev:79b71d322f7194ccc44aa3b543a05c38ad271cfb)) and predicted protein sequences with Prokka 1.14.0 (Seemann, 2014). For Bacteria (25,118 genomes), we used all entries on NCBI Genome as of 2019/06/01, dereplicated at species level through a combination of rpS3 clustering and dRep (Olm et al., 2017). We then downloaded the genomes from NCBI as protein fasta trying first GenBank, then RefSeq, and finally GenBank nucleotide contigs followed by predicting protein sequences with Prodigal (Hyatt et al., 2010). For Eukaryotes (1611 genomes), we used all entries on NCBI Genome as of 2019/06/01, taking one genome per species based on the txids using the completion status to pick said genome (in order of preference: Reference, Representative, Complete, Chromosome, Scaffold, and finally Contig state).

For all homology searches we used DIAMOND v2.0.8.146 (Buchfink et al., 2021) with the default e-value cutoff (--outfmt 6 –ultra-sensitive –max-target-seqs 0). For Archaea we used one query sequence for each of the main clades from Lombard, 2016: (1) the S. acidocaldarius Agl24 from this study; (2) the Alg13/EpsF-like and Alg14/EpsE-like homologs from Methanothrix soehngenii (NCBI: AEB67939.1 and AEB67938.1, respectively); (3) AIC14646.1 from Nitrososphaera viennensis (TACK clade); (4) ABX11947.1 from Nitrosopumilus maritimus (additional Alg13/EpsF-like Thaumarchaeota clade); (5) AAB99267.1 from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii (methanogen clade). For Bacteria and Eukaryotes, we used all non-MurG sequences from the corresponding Alg13/EpsF and Alg14/EpsE datasets from Lombard, 2016. To isolate the homologs of interest, we aligned these datasets with MAFFT FFT-NS-2 v7.453 (Katoh and Standley, 2013) (--reorder), trimmed the alignments with ClipKIT (Steenwyk et al., 2020) (-m kpi-gappy -g 0.5) and constructed phylogenies with IQ-TREE 2.0.5 (Minh et al., 2020) (-m TEST -mset JTT,WAG,LG -bb 1000 -alrt 1000) with 1000 each ultrafast bootstrap (Hoang et al., 2018) and aLRT SH-like (Guindon et al., 2010) replicates.

The homologs of interest were then isolated by manually inspecting the phylogenies and alignments. For Archaea we took all sequences associated with the clades from Lombard, 2016, using the same fused (non-EpsE/EpsF) homologs in both the Alg13/EpsF and Alg14/EpsE datasets (e.g., this resulted in adding the additional Thaumarchaeota sequences to the Alg14/EpsE dataset, whereas in Lombard, 2016, they were only found in the Alg13/EpsF dataset). The M. kandleri sequence that formed a divergent clade in the (Lombard, 2016) Alg14/EpsE trees was omitted altogether. For Eukaryotes we picked representative sequences trying to cover their known taxonomic range from the literature. For Bacteria we tried to gather representatives from all non-MurG-like clades of the preliminary phylogenies (see doi.org/10.7910/DVN/9KSWQR). For both Bacteria and Eukaryotes we tried to match the taxa contained in the Alg13/EpsF and Alg14/EpsE datasets based on the preliminary phylogenies and synteny (doi.org/10.7910/DVN/9KSWQR), in order to be able to concatenate sequences from split genes (see below). As outgroups, we used the bacterial MurG sequences from the respective (Lombard, 2016) datasets. The final datasets were realigned with MAFFT E-INS-i and trimmed with ClipKIT as above. The final phylogenies were inferred with IQ-TREE (-m MFP -mset JTT,WAG,LG -bb 1000 -alrt 1000) under the model determined by ModelFinder (Kalyaanamoorthy et al., 2017) and branch support tests as above. In spite of incongruencies between the Alg13/EpsF and Alg14/EpsE phylogenies, we also created pseudo-concatenated datasets by fusing all split sequences with a custom Python script (https://github.com/ProbstLab/Adam_Kolyfetis_2021_methanogenesis; Adam et al., 2021) in the order Alg14-13/EpsEF, as commonly found is archaeal Agl24-like and bacterial MurG homologs. For eukaryotic sequences that have resulted from gene fusion events (see Results), we checked the gene order through each sequence’s Uniprot cross-reference to Pfam. Whenever the genes were fused inversely (i.e., Alg13-14), we reversed them for the concatenation by manually taking the part of the sequence from the N-terminal to the end of Alg13 (Glyco_tran_28_C) as per the cross-reference and moving it to the end of the sequence (the C-terminal of Alg14). The concatenated dataset was aligned, trimmed, and a phylogeny was run as above. All trees were visualized in iTol (Letunic and Bork, 2019). Outgroup-free rooting was performed with the MAD method (Tria et al., 2017).

Data availability

Seed sequences, homology searches, preliminary phylogenies, final datasets (individual homologs), final datasets (full and trimmed alignments), and final phylogenies for the phylogenetic analysis are collected in a zip file, which can be assess under the following DOI: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/9KSWQR.

The following data sets were generated

References

  1. Book
    1. Albers S
    2. Eichler J
    3. Aebi M
    (2017)
    Essentials of Glycobiology Archaea
    Cold Spring Harbor (NY): Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
    1. Ha S
    2. Chang E
    3. Lo MC
    4. Men H
    5. Park P
    6. Ge M
    7. Walker S
    (1999)
    The kinetic characterization of Escherichia coli MurG using synthetic substrate analogues
    Journal of the American Chemical Society 121:8415–8426.
    1. Huet J
    2. Schnabel R
    3. Sentenac A
    4. Zillig W
    (1983)
    Archaebacteria and eukaryotes possess DNA-dependent RNA polymerases of a common type
    The EMBO Journal 2:1291–1294.
    1. Kleerebezem M
    2. van Kranenburg R
    3. Tuinier R
    4. Boels IC
    5. Zoon P
    6. Looijesteijn E
    7. Hugenholtz J
    8. de Vos WM
    (1999)
    Exopolysaccharides produced by Lactococcus lactis: from genetic engineering to improved rheological properties
    Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 76:357–365.
  2. Book
    1. Varki A
    2. Cummings R
    3. Esko J
    4. Freeze H
    5. Hart G
    6. Marth J
    (1999)
    Chapter 17, Glycosyltransferases. Essentials of Glycobiolog
    Cold Spring Harbor (NY): Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
  3. Book
    1. Whitfield C
    2. Szymanski CM
    3. Aebi M
    (2017)
    Essentials of Glycobiology
    Cold Spring Harbor (NY): Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

Decision letter

  1. Philip A Cole
    Senior and Reviewing Editor; Harvard Medical School, United States
  2. Patrick Forterre
    Reviewer; Institut Pasteur, France

Our editorial process produces two outputs: i) public reviews designed to be posted alongside the preprint for the benefit of readers; ii) feedback on the manuscript for the authors, including requests for revisions, shown below. We also include an acceptance summary that explains what the editors found interesting or important about the work.

Decision letter after peer review:

Thank you for submitting your article "N-glycan chitobiose core synthesis by Agl24 strengthens the hypothesis of an archaeal origin of eukaryal N-glycosylation" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by 3 peer reviewers, and the evaluation has been overseen by a Reviewing Editor and Michael Marletta as the Senior Editor. The following individual involved in review of your submission has agreed to reveal their identity: Patrick Forterre (Reviewer #2).

The reviewers have discussed their reviews with one another, and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this to help you prepare a revised submission.

Essential revisions:

1) Revise text for accuracy and readability as noted by the reviewers. Revise title, summary, discussion, and cover art to align with data provided.

2) Include statements to make the impact of the work on glycobiology more clear for the reader. Strengthen the messaging of the study as it relates to areas of emphasis noted by the reviewers (use of model system, motif, etc).

3) Revise the phylogenetic analysis to strengthen it.

4) Figure S4. Provide a control showing the subcellular fraction of another S. acidocaldarius protein of known distribution, to confirm the membrane association of Agl24. If authors are unable to provide this, then the text should be edited appropriately to make the conclusions tentative pending further confirmation in line with evidence provided.

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):

General comment – While the actual experiments are solid, the manuscript is very poorly written and even sloppy at places. Too many imprecise statements, errors in figures, etc (see examples, below). The manuscript would also be improved by a quick round of English language editing.

My specific comments are listed as encountered while reading the manuscript:

Introduction

Page 1, line 26 (Cover Art) – in the upper left-hand corner, an outline of something remains. Remove it.

Page 2, line 29 (and Page 2, line 54) – In Bacteria, N-glycosylation is seemingly limited to the δ/epsilon proteobacteria. As such, the statement: "Protein N-glycosylation is the most common posttranslational modifications found in all three domains of life" is inaccurate. Indeed, the authors themselves note this point (page 3, line 66).

Page 2, line 47 – remove comma between "histidine" and "within".

Page 2, line 55 – does eLife require references to be listed alphabetically or chronologically? Here, neither rule applies. Add a period at the end of the sentence.

Page 2, line 56 – the text reads: "In Eukarya, N-glycosylation is an essential process", yet on line 61, we are told: "the biological functions of protein glycosylation range from relatively minor to crucial for survival". The two phrases don't match.

Page 3, line 69 – what about the non-lipid-dependent N-glycosylation that occurs in some bacteria (e.g. Haemophilus influenzae HMW1 adhesin or the actions of NGT, the N-glycosylating GTase in Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae )?

Page 3, line 74 – to the best of my knowledge, the extended bacterial sequon D/E-X1-N-Χ2-S/T (where X is not proline) is recognized in Campylobacter jejuni and Helicobacter pullorum, the OST of other bacteria show a more relaxed specificity (for instance, see Ollis et al., 2015 Sci Reports).

Page 3, line 77 – The statement: "Eukarya require an OST complex of nine subunits" is not accurate. Trypanosomes use a single subunit-containing OST.

Page 3, lines 78-82 – The writing here is very sloppy. In lines 78-79, we are told: "In contrast, Archaea use the shorter version of the recognition sequon (N-X-S/T) as well as dolichol-phosphate (Dol) as lipid", yet lines 81-82 read: "while the Crenarchaeota use Dol pyrophosphate as in eukaryotes".

Page 4, line 103 – "This is a rare example of cross-domain complementation" is inaccurate. There are numerous examples of complementation of a eukaryote mutant by a bacterial gene (for instance, see Kachroo et al., eLife 2017 for examples). Moreover, no hypothesis of a common origin for eukaryotic and archaeal N-glycosylation was stated up to this point, so it is not clear how this statement further strengthens such a concept.

Page 4, lines 108-109 – Agl24 would not generate the lipid-linked chitobiose core; rather, it would contribute to the assembly of this moiety.

Page 4, line 110 – On lines 103-104, the reader is told "of a common origin of eukaryotic and archaeal N-glycosylation", yet here it is proposed that "the eukaryotic N-glycosylation pathway originates from an archaeal ancestor". These scenarios are not really the same thing.

Larkin et al., (2013, Nat Chem Biol), where AglK was shown to add GlcNAc to dolichol phosphate in the methanoarchaea Methanococcus voltae should also be addressed in the Introduction, especially given how genetic studies on this organism have assigned this role to AglH (Shams-Eldin et al., 2008, J. Bacteriol.).

Likewise, the N-linked glycan of the crenarchaeote Pyrobaculum calidifontis, which includes a core reminiscent of chitobiose (Fujinami et al., 2017, Glycobiology) should also be noted in the Introduction.

Results

Page 5, line 115 – "this"?

Page 5, lines 123-124 – Not accurate. CAZy lists the halophile Salinadaptatus halalkaliphilus, a member of the family Natrialbaceae, as a GT28 family member (http://www.cazy.org/GT28_archaea.html). Also, Kandler and/or Konig should be cited for their work on pseudomurein.

Page 5, line 142 – The authors should refer to the paper by Cavalier-Smith and Chao (2020, Protoplama) where Saci1262 is described as corresponding to MurG. Indeed, this reference addresses similarities between MurG, Alg13/14 and Saci1262.

Page 6, line 148 – At this stage of the story, there is no justification in assigning Saci1262 to the N-glycosylation pathway, namely, assigning it the Agl tag used for confirmed archaeal N-glycosylation pathway components. Such involvement needs to be first demonstrated – no such demonstration has been presented at this stage of the report.

Page 6, lines 149-153 – Since the reader is not told where other N-glycosylation genes are found relative to Saci1262, this bit of text could confuse those outside the field. Indeed, the authors finish the section by stating how Saci1262 is only eight genes downstream of the OST-encoding aglB gene, leaving the reader unclear as to how N-glycosylation gene clustering is defined.

The "Detailed bioinformatics….." section beginning on line 156 would be easier to read if the authors better separated data based on sequence comparisons from data based on structural comparisons. Moreover, including evolutionary considerations in the middle of the first paragraph of the section (lines 163-168) further adds to mixture of ideas that require better organization.

Page 6, line 170 – "archaeal Agl24 enzymes"? At this point, the reader has only been told of Saci1262. Figure 1B and Figure S2, where archaeal Saci1262 homologues are listed, have not yet been cited in the text. Indeed, without knowing anything about N-glycosylation in the majority of these species, it is premature to assign them the Agl24 title – at this stage they are homologues of Saci1262.

Figure 1A – "Archaea" should not be italicized. Also, why "most Eukarya" and not "higher Eukarya", since "lower Eukarya" is used? Line 181 – orthologs.

Figure 1B – the background color scheme is not defined anywhere. Also, "Euryarchaeota" and "Crenarchaeota" should be used, rather than Euryarchaea and Crenarchaea. Why include an artificial yeast Alg13/14 fusion and not the true sequences? Also, maybe I am getting too old to see tiny figures, but it is really hard to follow the color-based sequence alignment presented. How are the red and yellow residues at the end of the Leishmania sequence conserved since they are only found in that one sequence?

Figure 1C – why not used the same color-coding as used in Figure 1A and 1B? The legend says the Alg13 domain is in turquoise – it is not.

Page 8, line 204 – eukaryotic

Page 8, line 211 – what the RMSD of the homology model? In other words, how good is the fit?

Page 8, line 223 – "both"? E114 and, I assume, H14. Say it better.

Page 8, line 224 – is it known that all the archaeal species assigned to GT28 produce pseudomurein or is this just being assumed?

Page 8, line 226 – "the different acceptor molecule"? As the reader may not be an expert in the field, a reminder of the different acceptor molecules might be in place here.

Page 9, line 233 – a gene (agl24) is essential, not the protein product.

Page 9, line 235 – agl24 not Agl24

Is it possible to create a S. acidocaldarius strain lacking agl24 but in which either the MurG- or Alg13/14-encoding genes are introduced?

Figure S3 – The figure title talks of agl23 deletion. Also, agl24 not Agl24 throughout.

Page 9, line 252 – As written, the sub-heading implies that GlcNAc alone can serve as acceptor. This was not shown.

Figure S4A – Without a control showing the subcellular fraction of another S. acidocaldarius protein of known distribution, the membrane association of Agl24 is not confirmed. Is the Agl24 in the supernatant spill from the membrane lane?

Figure S4C – what does the light blue background represent? What do E and H under the sequence mean (H, hydrophobic; E, ?).

Page 9, lines 258-263 – The reader is directed to Figure 3C, then to Figure 3A and Figure 3B, then to Figure 3D and Figure 3E. Reorder the panels or the text to go from A-E.

Figure 3 – If the in vitro reaction was allowed to run for a prolonged period, was Agl24 able to add an additional GlcNAc?

Page 10, line 274 – reference?

Figure 4 – In each panel, there remain the frames of rectangles used to cover up apparently unrelated values of around the values above each peak. Very sloppy! The last sentence should read "Above 50°C, the increase in the level of the product at the expense of the level of the acceptor is clearly visible".

Page 11, line 292 – Alanine substitution was not inactive. Rather enzymes in which alanine was substituted for histidine were inactive.

Page 11, line 300 – As written, the text leads the reader to believe that only H14 and E114 are conserved. E114 is a second conserved residue, not the second conserved residue.

Figure 5 – The previous section described H14 as being important. Here, H15 is addressed. Also, in each panel, there remain the frames of rectangles around the values above each peak. Again, very sloppy!

Page 14, line 353 – Do the Eps-like sequences in the Euryarchaeota include any of the known enzymes experimentally confirmed as being involved in adding linking sugars?

Page 14, line 363 – "within them" – who is them? Members of the TACK superphylum or in some Euryarchaeota? Not clear.

The entire "The eukaryotic GTs…." section is very difficult to follow. The addition of more narration to this section would make it more readable.

Figure 7 – The use of so much color is distracting. Why does each phylum need a different color? Bootstrap values should be provided to attest to the support given to each clade. How many iterations were run?

Discussion

Page 15, line 403 – 'respectively', not 'either'.

Page 17, line 454 – Does Pyrobaculum calidifontis contain an AglC homologue?

Page 17, line 458 – The authors state: "comparison of archaeal molecular

processes has gradually revealed a strong resemblance to those found in eukaryotes". This is more true of the Crenarchaeota than of the Euryarchaeota.

Page 17, line 463 – "A" current hypothesis.

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):

I suggest that you slightly change the way you introduce your identification of Alg24 by first describing how you modelled the structure of your candidate enzyme and identified the conserved amino-acids before naming the enzyme and compare Alg24 with its homologues. I suggest that you include EpsF in this comparison. You should put more emphasis on the identification of the motif GGxGGH motif. You could possibly mention and discuss the genetic work in the discussion part. For the phylogenetic analysis, I suggest that you perform a concatenation (removing Methanopyrus kandleri which is a fast-evolving species and disturb the phylogeny with Alg14) and consider my comments about the different subgroups. It should be important having more details about the phylogeny of EpsF and eukaryotes. In fact, your paper is sufficiently interesting and important in the fields of N-glucosylation, that you don't need to oversell it through the fashionable 2D domains story and the Asgard origin of eukaryotes. You repeatedly claim (and illustrate in the cover art) that your phylogenetic analysis indicates that eukaryotic have close homologues in Asgard, suggesting an Asgard origin of these proteins. On the contrary, an interesting aspect of your paper for me is that most Asgard have no Agl13/14 homologues, except a few MAGs that have a distant one. This should be confirmed by the analysis of more Asgard. If the lack of Agl13/14 homologues is confirmed, it will be crystal clear that the few sequences found in Asgard MAGs are not representative of Asgard, in general, and that, even in a 2D perspective, Alg13/14 did not originated from Asgard. You should definitely remove from the title, covert art and so on all misleading sentences with respect to the archaeal and/or Asgard origin of eukaryotes.

Reviewer #3 (Recommendations for the authors):

Considering the similarity between N-glycosylation of Eukaryotes and Archaea belonging to TACK superphylum, in the text it should be stressed that GTs from thermophilic Archaea could be excellent models to study the structure/function relationship of elusive eukaryotic enzymes. Their stability could be of great help for detailed characterization and 3D structure. The authors could comment this in the text.

Similarly, the authors should stress that S. acidocaldarius could be used as model system in vivo to proof the function of archaeal homologs of eukaryotic GTs.

Alg24 is homolog to MurG and Alg13/14 belonging, respectively to CAZy families GT28 and GT1, but the low sequence identity left Alg24 unassigned. The scientists in the field of glycobiology would be happy to know in which GT family can be classified Alg24. It would be of great help for others working in this field.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67448.sa1

Author response

Essential revisions:

1) Revise text for accuracy and readability as noted by the reviewers. Revise title, summary, discussion, and cover art to align with data provided.

2) Include statements to make the impact of the work on glycobiology more clear for the reader. Strengthen the messaging of the study as it relates to areas of emphasis noted by the reviewers (use of model system, motif, etc).

3) Revise the phylogenetic analysis to strengthen it.

4) Figure S4. Provide a control showing the subcellular fraction of another S. acidocaldarius protein of known distribution, to confirm the membrane association of Agl24. If authors are unable to provide this, then the text should be edited appropriately to make the conclusions tentative pending further confirmation in line with evidence provided.

We have conducted all essential revisions.

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):

General comment – While the actual experiments are solid, the manuscript is very poorly written and even sloppy at places. Too many imprecise statements, errors in figures, etc (see examples, below). The manuscript would also be improved by a quick round of English language editing.

My specific comments are listed as encountered while reading the manuscript:

Introduction

Page 1, line 26 (Cover Art) – in the upper left-hand corner, an outline of something remains. Remove it.

We thank the reviewer for recognizing this outer line, which appeared after the conversion into the pdf format. Based on the other reviewer comments we have removed the cover art.

Page 2, line 29 (and Page 2, line 54) – In Bacteria, N-glycosylation is seemingly limited to the δ/epsilon proteobacteria. As such, the statement: "Protein N-glycosylation is the most common posttranslational modifications found in all three domains of life" is inaccurate. Indeed, the authors themselves note this point (page 3, line 66).

The sentence has been changed to:

“Protein N-glycosylation is a posttranslational modification found in all three domains of life"

Page 2, line 47 – remove comma between "histidine" and "within".

The sentence has been corrected.

Page 2, line 55 – does eLife require references to be listed alphabetically or chronologically? Here, neither rule applies. Add a period at the end of the sentence.

We have changed the in-text citations to chronological order.

Page 2, line 56 – the text reads: "In Eukarya, N-glycosylation is an essential process", yet on line 61, we are told: "the biological functions of protein glycosylation range from relatively minor to crucial for survival". The two phrases don't match.

We agree with the reviewer that the two sentences might confuse the reader. However, in the first sentence the essentiality is restricted to the N-glycosylation of Eukaryotes, while the second sentence describing the effect protein of glycosylation a broader view (N-,O-, P-, C-glycosylation in all domains of life). We have therefore rewritten the paragraph.

Page 3, line 69 – what about the non-lipid-dependent N-glycosylation that occurs in some bacteria (e.g. Haemophilus influenzae HMW1 adhesin or the actions of NGT, the N-glycosylating GTase in Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae )?

We thank the reviewer for this reminder. We have added the non-lipid-dependent N-glycosylation of Bacteria and changed the references accordingly.

Page 3, line 74 – to the best of my knowledge, the extended bacterial sequon D/E-X1-N-Χ2-S/T (where X is not proline) is recognized in Campylobacter jejuni and Helicobacter pullorum, the OST of other bacteria show a more relaxed specificity (for instance, see Ollis et al., 2015 Sci Reports).

We had added the more stringent requirement of Campylobacter jejuni and Helicobacter pullorum OSTs of an acidic residue in the −2 position of the sequon.

“Target proteins contain a specific asparagine residue found within the conserved sequon (N-X-S/T, X ≠ proline), which is recognized by the OST. However, some bacterial OSTs, e.g., those of Campylobacter jejuni, require an acidic residue at the −2 position of the sequon (D/E-X1-N-Χ2-S/T, X1, Χ2 ≠ P) for successful transfer (Ollis et al., 2015).”

However, we later removed this paragraph, as this information is unnecessary to follow the study.

Page 3, line 77 – The statement: "Eukarya require an OST complex of nine subunits" is not accurate. Trypanosomes use a single subunit-containing OST.

The sentence has been expanded accordingly to account for different complexities of the OST in Eukaryotes.

Page 3, lines 78-82 – The writing here is very sloppy. In lines 78-79, we are told: "In contrast, Archaea use the shorter version of the recognition sequon (N-X-S/T) as well as dolichol-phosphate (Dol) as lipid", yet lines 81-82 read: "while the Crenarchaeota use Dol pyrophosphate as in eukaryotes".

The sentence has been rewritten to clarify the differences among the bacterial, eukaryotic, and archaeal N-glycosylation.

Page 4, line 103 – "This is a rare example of cross-domain complementation" is inaccurate. There are numerous examples of complementation of a eukaryote mutant by a bacterial gene (for instance, see Kachroo et al., eLife 2017 for examples). Moreover, no hypothesis of a common origin for eukaryotic and archaeal N-glycosylation was stated up to this point, so it is not clear how this statement further strengthens such a concept.

The sentence has been deleted, as this statement is unnecessary.

Page 4, lines 108-109 – Agl24 would not generate the lipid-linked chitobiose core; rather, it would contribute to the assembly of this moiety.

We have now changed the sentence to:

“Activity assays, along with HPLC, MALDI, and NMR analyses confirmed the function of Agl24 as catalyzing the second N-glycan biosynthesis step to generate the lipid-linked chitobiose core.”

Page 4, line 110 – On lines 103-104, the reader is told "of a common origin of eukaryotic and archaeal N-glycosylation", yet here it is proposed that "the eukaryotic N-glycosylation pathway originates from an archaeal ancestor". These scenarios are not really the same thing.

We thank the reviewer for noticing this. We meant that the eukaryotic and archaeal N-glycosylation share a common ancestor (which they technically do, even if the eukaryotic homologs branch from within Archaea), the phrase is not appropriate. We have kept the sentence “Our extensive bioinformatics analyses support the hypothesis that the eukaryotic N-glycosylation pathway originates from an archaeal ancestor.”, as it is in our opinion the optimal way to phrase this.

Larkin et al., (2013, Nat Chem Biol), where AglK was shown to add GlcNAc to dolichol phosphate in the methanoarchaea Methanococcus voltae should also be addressed in the Introduction, especially given how genetic studies on this organism have assigned this role to AglH (Shams-Eldin et al., 2008, J. Bacteriol.).

We agree with the reviewer and have added the following text:

“This functional complementation has been first described for the AglH of Methanococcus voltae (Shams-Eldin et al., 2008), which has suggested that AglH initiates the N-glycosylation by transferring GlcNAc-1-P onto Dol-P. However, a biochemical study clearly showed that AglK is responsible for the generation of Dol-P-GlcNAc, on which the N-glycan is assembled (Larkin et al., 2013). This observation agrees that Euryarchaeota build their N-glycans on Dol-P and not on Dol-pyrophosphate in a similar manner to Crenarchaeaota and Eukaryotes (Taguchi et al., 2016).”

Likewise, the N-linked glycan of the crenarchaeote Pyrobaculum calidifontis, which includes a core reminiscent of chitobiose (Fujinami et al., 2017, Glycobiology) should also be noted in the Introduction.

We agree and have added following text:

“Recently, the characterization of the N-glycan from Pyrobaculum calidifontis, belonging in the Thermoproteales order of the Crenarchaeota, revealed as similar N-glycan chitobiose core structure, with the difference that both GlcNAc are modified with an additional N-acetyl group at the C3 position (Fujinami et al., 2017).”

Results

Page 5, line 115 – "this"?

We have changed “this” to: “the”

Page 5, lines 123-124 – Not accurate. CAZy lists the halophile Salinadaptatus halalkaliphilus, a member of the family Natrialbaceae, as a GT28 family member (http://www.cazy.org/GT28_archaea.html). Also, Kandler and/or Konig should be cited for their work on pseudomurein.

We thank the reviewer for pointing this out. We have added to the text that

a GT belonging to the halophilic Salinadaptatus halalkaliphilus was recently grouped with the GT family 28 in the CAZy database;

We have also amended the citations to refer to the work of Kandler and Konig for the analyses and description of pseudomurein (Kandler and König, 1978, König et al., 1982).

Page 5, line 142 – The authors should refer to the paper by Cavalier-Smith and Chao (2020, Protoplama) where Saci1262 is described as corresponding to MurG. Indeed, this reference addresses similarities between MurG, Alg13/14 and Saci1262.

We have added the following text:

“In addition, phylogenetic studies indicate similarities of MurG and Alg14-13 with Saci1262 (Cavalier-Smith and Chao, 2020, Lombard, 2016).”

Page 6, line 148 – At this stage of the story, there is no justification in assigning Saci1262 to the N-glycosylation pathway, namely, assigning it the Agl tag used for confirmed archaeal N-glycosylation pathway components. Such involvement needs to be first demonstrated – no such demonstration has been presented at this stage of the report.

We agree with the reviewer. We now assign Saci1262 as archaeal glycosylation enzyme 24 (Agl24) after we have demonstrated its function.

Page 6, lines 149-153 – Since the reader is not told where other N-glycosylation genes are found relative to Saci1262, this bit of text could confuse those outside the field. Indeed, the authors finish the section by stating how Saci1262 is only eight genes downstream of the OST-encoding aglB gene, leaving the reader unclear as to how N-glycosylation gene clustering is defined.

We have added the following sentence to the text:

“Interestingly, the gene saci1262 is located only eight genes downstream of the OST aglB (saci1274) in S. acidocaldarius (Figure S1), while the genes coding for the identified enzymes involved in the N-glycosylation, e.g. aglH (saci0093), agl3 (saci423), or agl16 (saci0807), are found distantly far separated scattered over across the entire genome.”

The "Detailed bioinformatics….." section beginning on line 156 would be easier to read if the authors better separated data based on sequence comparisons from data based on structural comparisons. Moreover, including evolutionary considerations in the middle of the first paragraph of the section (lines 163-168) further adds to mixture of ideas that require better organization.

The whole section has been rearranged to separate the data based on the sequence and data based on the structural comparison. Additionally, the sentence on the evolutionary considerations has been removed.

Page 6, line 170 – "archaeal Agl24 enzymes"? At this point, the reader has only been told of Saci1262. Figure 1B and Figure S2, where archaeal Saci1262 homologues are listed, have not yet been cited in the text. Indeed, without knowing anything about N-glycosylation in the majority of these species, it is premature to assign them the Agl24 title – at this stage they are homologues of Saci1262.

We agree; we now assign Saci1262 as archaeal glycosylation enzyme 24 (Agl24) after we have demonstrated its function (see above).

Figure 1A – "Archaea" should not be italicized. Also, why "most Eukarya" and not "higher Eukarya", since "lower Eukarya" is used? Line 181 – orthologs.

Thank you for pointing this out. In addition, we have switched all mentions of “higher” and “lower” Eukaryotes to “recently-” and “deep-branching” to be more correct from an evolutionary standpoint.

Figure 1B – the background color scheme is not defined anywhere. Also, "Euryarchaeota" and "Crenarchaeota" should be used, rather than Euryarchaea and Crenarchaea. Why include an artificial yeast Alg13/14 fusion and not the true sequences? Also, maybe I am getting too old to see tiny figures, but it is really hard to follow the color-based sequence alignment presented. How are the red and yellow residues at the end of the Leishmania sequence conserved since they are only found in that one sequence?

A description of the background color has been added to the legend. The terms Euryarchaeota and Crenarchaeota are now used. We used an artificial fusion of Alg14-13 as the genes are split in yeast, to enable the comparison. Indeed, in the alignments the Weblogo highlights at the end of the sequence of Leishmania a lysine (K) residue. This conservation does not make sense at it is the only sequence extending so far, thus it was corrected. A larger alignment is now shown instead in Figure S2.

Figure 1C – why not used the same color-coding as used in Figure 1A and 1B? The legend says the Alg13 domain is in turquoise – it is not.

We now use the same color-coding for Figure 1A and 1B (Bacteria: light and dark violet, Eukarya: light and dark gray, and Crenarchaeota: light and dark orange)

Page 8, line 204 – eukaryotic

This has been corrected.

Page 8, line 211 – what the RMSD of the homology model? In other words, how good is the fit?

To give a better estimation of the fit of our structural homology model we added the Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD) values in Table S2. Also, in table S2 the Swiss Model fits are displayed, e.g., the Global Model Quality Estimation (GMQE), quaternary structure quality estimate (QSQE), and sequence identity to the different known Structures of MurG and Alg13.

We also ran ALPHAFOLD, which predicted a similar model we had obtain from Swiss model, we also include this in the text and table S2 (RMSD ALPHAFOLD vs Agl24 model: 3.80).

Page 8, line 223 – "both"? E114 and, I assume, H14. Say it better.

We have now specified E114 and H14.

Page 8, line 224 – is it known that all the archaeal species assigned to GT28 produce pseudomurein or is this just being assumed?

All Archaea possessing a GT, which are grouped to the Family GT28, are known to produce a pseduomurein cell wall. This includes the members of the archaeal order Methanobacteriales (e.g. Methanothermus fervidus, Methanosphaera stadtmanae, and Methanobrevibacter formicicum) and the order Methanopyrales (Methanopyrus kandleri), with the exception of the newly discovered Salinadaptatus halalkaliphilus 2447, for which no information of the cell-wall composition exists. We therefore have added the following text:

“of known pseudomurein-producing Archaea of the order Methanobacteriales and Methanopyrales.”

Page 8, line 226 – "the different acceptor molecule"? As the reader may not be an expert in the field, a reminder of the different acceptor molecules might be in place here.

Thank you for bringing this to our attention. We have added the following:

“We propose that these residues might be required to accommodate the different sugar N-acetyltalosaminuronic acid of the lipid-linked acceptor molecule in the pseudomurein biosynthesis process.”

Currently, there is only the proposed biosynthesis process of pseudomurein reported by Kandler and König (1993) “Cell envelopes of archaea: Structure and chemistry”, which proposed a similar biosynthetic pathway for pseudomurein. However, at that time it was predicted that UDP-MurNAc-peptides and UDP-GlcNAc are linked prior the transfer of this di-saccharide-peptide-linker to the lipid carrier.

Page 9, line 233 – a gene (agl24) is essential, not the protein product.

This has been corrected.

Page 9, line 235 – agl24 not Agl24

This has been corrected.

Is it possible to create a S. acidocaldarius strain lacking agl24 but in which either the MurG- or Alg13/14-encoding genes are introduced?

Indeed, it is possible to integrate genes in the genome of S. acidocaldarius. This was done for the oligosaccharyltransferase gene aglB to show that the original aglB can be deleted, when a second copy is present in the genome at a different location (Meyer and Albers 2014):

“AglB catalyzing the oligosaccharyl transferase step of the archaeal N-glycosylation process is essential in the thermoacidophilic crenarchaeon Sulfolobus acidocaldarius”.

However, based on the thermophilic growth condition of S. acidocaldarius at 75°C a complementation with a eukaryotic Alg14-13 is not possible. There are, of course, thermostable homologs of the bacterial MurG, e.g., of Hydrogenivirga, which could be used for an integration. However, as the N-glycosylation is essential in Sulfolobus acidocaldarius and the transposon mutagenesis study in S. islandicus confirmed our finding of the essential properties of saci1262 (agl24), we did not proceed with a complementation approach.”

Figure S3 – The figure title talks of agl23 deletion. Also, agl24 not Agl24 throughout.

We thank the reviewer for pointing this out. We have corrected this mistake. During the writing of the manuscript the genes agl22 and agl23 in Haloarcula hispanica were described, therefore the numbering was changed to agl24 for saci1262. The text has been corrected accordingly.

Page 9, line 252 – As written, the sub-heading implies that GlcNAc alone can serve as acceptor. This was not shown.

The sub-header has been changed to:

“Agl24 transfers a single GlcNAc residue onto a GlcNAc pyrophosphate linked acceptor molecule” to avoid any confusion.”

Figure S4A – Without a control showing the subcellular fraction of another S. acidocaldarius protein of known distribution, the membrane association of Agl24 is not confirmed. Is the Agl24 in the supernatant spill from the membrane lane?

We agree with the reviewer. We have conducted additional experiments. Saci1262(Agl24) was purified together with the soluble protein Agl3 (UPD-Sulfoquinovose synthase) to show that the cellular localization is distinct from Agl3. However, due to the lack of a “Duet” expression plasmid for S. acidocaldarius, two strains expressing either the Saci1262(Agl24) or Agl3 were mixed (1:1 ratio), followed by the separation of the membrane and soluble fraction by ultracentrifugation. These new results revealed that Agl3 is only found in the soluble fraction, while Saci1262(Agl24) is also found in the membrane faction (Figure S4 A and B).

Figure S4C – what does the light blue background represent? What do E and H under the sequence mean (H, hydrophobic; E, ?).

The light blue background was removed and the following text has been added to the legend:

“Secondary protein structure prediction by the Jpred Server. Top line corresponds to the amino acid sequence of Saci1262/Agl24, the second line represent extended (E), helical (H) and other (-) types of secondary structure, respectively.”

Page 9, lines 258-263 – The reader is directed to Figure 3C, then to Figure 3A and Figure 3B, then to Figure 3D and Figure 3E. Reorder the panels or the text to go from A-E.

We have changed the text starting with Figure 3A and C. However, to enable a better comparison we have retained the order of the panels to show the substrates’ MALDI-MS spectra directly above the product spectrum of each acceptor molecule.

Figure 3 – If the in vitro reaction was allowed to run for a prolonged period, was Agl24 able to add an additional GlcNAc?

We were not able to see a peak corresponding to the mass of an additional GlcNAc (1033 m/z [M-2H+3Na]+ Acceptor-1 or 1100 m/z [M-2H+3Na]+ Acceptor-2). Therefore, we have added the following sentence: “With an extended reaction time, no further additions of GlcNAc by Agl24 could be detected.” SF6 A shows a representative HPLC trace of the enzymatic reaction, revealing that no additional product peaks are formed in the Saci1262(Agl24) assay.

Page 10, line 274 – reference?

The reference “Brock et al., 1972” has been added.

Figure 4 – In each panel, there remain the frames of rectangles used to cover up apparently unrelated values of around the values above each peak. Very sloppy! The last sentence should read "Above 50°C, the increase in the level of the product at the expense of the level of the acceptor is clearly visible".

During the conversion to a pdf file, the empty text boxes of negligible peaks became visible. They have now been deleted. The last sentence has been modified based on the reviewer’s suggestion.

Page 11, line 292 – Alanine substitution was not inactive. Rather enzymes in which alanine was substituted for histidine were inactive.

The text has been corrected.

Page 11, line 300 – As written, the text leads the reader to believe that only H14 and E114 are conserved. E114 is a second conserved residue, not the second conserved residue.

The word “second” has been removed.

Figure 5 – The previous section described H14 as being important. Here, H15 is addressed. Also, in each panel, there remain the frames of rectangles around the values above each peak. Again, very sloppy!

The text and visible frames have now been corrected.

Page 14, line 353 – Do the Eps-like sequences in the Euryarchaeota include any of the known enzymes experimentally confirmed as being involved in adding linking sugars?

To our knowledge, none of these Eps-like homologs in Euryarchaeota has been characterized.

Page 14, line 363 – "within them" – who is them? Members of the TACK superphylum or in some Euryarchaeota? Not clear.

The entire section on the evolution of Agl24 and its homologs has been rewritten, in light of having used an expanded set of genomes for our analyses. Originally, the sentence was referring to the various archaeal clades, i.e., there existing an Agl24 clade among them. We do concur that the statement was ambiguous.

The entire "The eukaryotic GTs…." section is very difficult to follow. The addition of more narration to this section would make it more readable.

We would like to thank the reviewer for this comment and we hope that with this revised section, it will be more straightforward to follow. Some details on the evolution of these homologs have been added to the manuscript. Nonetheless, we would like to point out that the purpose was to focus more on Agl24 itself and the relationship of the eukaryotic and Asgard sequences with one another and the remaining homologs, instead of every single archaeal homolog. In addition, to go into more detail, we added the uncollapsed phylogenies in the Supplementary Information and Supplementary Data 1 and refer to these, to avoid cluttering the Results sections.

Figure 7 – The use of so much color is distracting. Why does each phylum need a different color? Bootstrap values should be provided to attest to the support given to each clade. How many iterations were run?

While the plan initially was to use separate colors to help make each lineage distinct, we have heeded the reviewer’s advice and only added color to the most important clades (Agl24, Eukaryotes, Asgards), as described in the text. Furthermore, we have removed the background color, since we agree that it was distracting. As described in the Figure 7 legend, the black dots denote strongly supported clades (ultrafast boostrap >=95, aLRT SH-like >=80), as suggested in the IQ-TREE documentation and the supports are also provided in the uncollapsed phylogenies now provided as Supplementary Figures. The number of replicates (1000 each for ultrafast bootstraps and aLRT SH-like) is mentioned in the corresponding part of the Methods section.

Discussion

Page 15, line 403 – 'respectively', not 'either'.

This has been corrected.

Page 17, line 454 – Does Pyrobaculum calidifontis contain an AglC homologue?

There exists a potential AglC homolog in P. calidifontis. We have added the following:

“The best candidate for an AglC homolog in P. calidifontis is Pcal_0481 showing 29.91% sequence identity. Interestingly, the structure has recently been described, while the predicted function as a mannosyltransferase could not be experimentally confirmed (Gandini et al., 2020).”

Page 17, line 458 – The authors state: "comparison of archaeal molecular

processes has gradually revealed a strong resemblance to those found in eukaryotes". This is more true of the Crenarchaeota than of the Euryarchaeota.

The sentence has been revised to:

“Since the discovery of the Archaea as the third domain of life along with Bacteria and Eukaryotes (Woese and Fox, 1977), the comparison of archaeal molecular processes, especially those found in Crenarchaeota, has gradually revealed a strong resemblance the ones found in Eukaryotes (Huet et al., 1983, Zillig et al., 1989, Akil and Robinson, 2018, Akil et al., 2020).”

Page 17, line 463 – "A" current hypothesis.

The sentence has been changed.

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):

I suggest that you slightly change the way you introduce your identification of Alg24 by first describing how you modelled the structure of your candidate enzyme and identified the conserved amino-acids before naming the enzyme and compare Alg24 with its homologues. I suggest that you include EpsF in this comparison. You should put more emphasis on the identification of the motif GGxGGH motif.

We thank the reviewer for this suggestion. Based on the lack of structural information on EpsE/F enzymes, they were not included, only the well described MurG and Alg14-13.

You could possibly mention and discuss the genetic work in the discussion part.

We added the information that the essentiality is a good indication that this enzyme is the most likely candidate to conduct the second N-glycosylation step.

For the phylogenetic analysis, I suggest that you perform a concatenation (removing Methanopyrus kandleri which is a fast-evolving species and disturb the phylogeny with Alg14) and consider my comments about the different subgroups. It should be important having more details about the phylogeny of EpsF and eukaryotes.

As we explained above, we did run a concatenated phylogeny of the two proteins although it is not good practice in this case, due to the incongruences between the individual phylogenies. Additional details about the EpsEF and eukaryotic clades can be gleaned from the Supplementary Figures, but they were not the focus of this manuscript and we did not use the full range of sequences in the final phylogenies (mainly due to the computational load and suspecting that divergent sequences would reduce the quality of the alignment).

In fact, your paper is sufficiently interesting and important in the fields of N-glucosylation, that you don't need to oversell it through the fashionable 2D domains story and the Asgard origin of eukaryotes. You repeatedly claim (and illustrate in the cover art) that your phylogenetic analysis indicates that eukaryotic have close homologues in Asgard, suggesting an Asgard origin of these proteins. On the contrary, an interesting aspect of your paper for me is that most Asgard have no Agl13/14 homologues, except a few MAGs that have a distant one. This should be confirmed by the analysis of more Asgard. If the lack of Agl13/14 homologues is confirmed, it will be crystal clear that the few sequences found in Asgard MAGs are not representative of Asgard, in general, and that, even in a 2D perspective, Alg13/14 did not originated from Asgard. You should definitely remove from the title, covert art and so on all misleading sentences with respect to the archaeal and/or Asgard origin of eukaryotes.

We are inclined to agree with many of these suggestions. The situation of the Asgards regarding N-glycosylation appears to be far more complicated than what would be expected from simply adhering to a 2D scenario. On the other hand, the eukaryotic homologs are of archaeal origin and their closest currently known relatives are Asgards. Therefore, in the revised manuscript we have explored the different implications of our phylogenies. We have removed the cover art to avoid any confusions.

Reviewer #3 (Recommendations for the authors):

Considering the similarity between N-glycosylation of Eukaryotes and Archaea belonging to TACK superphylum, in the text it should be stressed that GTs from thermophilic Archaea could be excellent models to study the structure/function relationship of elusive eukaryotic enzymes. Their stability could be of great help for detailed characterization and 3D structure. The authors could comment this in the text.

Similarly, the authors should stress that S. acidocaldarius could be used as model system in vivo to proof the function of archaeal homologs of eukaryotic GTs.

We have highlighted the excellent opportunity to study the homologs of the eukaryotic GT in Archaea, and in particular in S. acidocaldarius, in the last paragraph.

Alg24 is homolog to MurG and Alg13/14 belonging, respectively to CAZy families GT28 and GT1, but the low sequence identity left Alg24 unassigned. The scientists in the field of glycobiology would be happy to know in which GT family can be classified Alg24. It would be of great help for others working in this field.

We have contacted Prof. Bernard Henrissat, the creator of the CAZy database. Agl24 will be assigned to a new GT family as soon as the paper is accepted and in the proof stage.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67448.sa2

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Benjamin H Meyer

    1. Environmental Microbiology and Biotechnology (EMB), Aquatic Microbial Ecology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
    2. Division of Molecular Microbiology, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    3. Molecular Biology of Archaea, Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing
    For correspondence
    benjamin.meyer@uni-due.de
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4986-9511
  2. Panagiotis S Adam

    Group for Aquatic Microbial Ecology, Environmental Microbiology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Chemistry University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
    Contribution
    Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4251-7262
  3. Ben A Wagstaff

    Division of Molecular Microbiology, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    Contribution
    Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  4. George E Kolyfetis

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
    Contribution
    Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  5. Alexander J Probst

    Centre of Water and Environmental Research (ZWU), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
    Contribution
    Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  6. Sonja V Albers

    Molecular Biology of Archaea, Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2459-2226
  7. Helge C Dorfmueller

    Division of Molecular Microbiology, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing
    For correspondence
    hczdorfmueller@dundee.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1288-044X

Funding

The Wellcome Trust and Royal Society Grant (109357/Z/15/Z)

  • Benjamin Meyer
  • Ben A Wagstaff
  • Helge C Dorfmueller

SFG (403222702-SFB 1381)

  • Benjamin Meyer
  • Sonja V Albers

Ministerium für Kultur und Wissenschaft des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen (Nachwuchsgruppe Dr. Alexander Probst)

  • Alexander J Probst

Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (Postdoctoral fellowship)

  • Panagiotis S Adam

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Acknowledgements

We thank Vladimir I Torgov, Vladimir V Veselovsky, and Leonid L Danilov from the ND Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, for sharing the synthetic acceptor molecules. We thank Mr Tom Snelling for assay assistance. Funding: The HCD laboratory (BHM, BAW, and HCD) is supported by The Wellcome Trust and Royal Society Grant 109357/Z/15/Z and the University of Dundee Wellcome Trust Fund 105606/Z/14/Z. SVA and BHM have been supported by the SFG grant SFB 1381 (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) under project no. 403222702-SFB 1381). PSA is supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. AJP is supported by funding from the Ministerium für Kultur und Wissenschaft des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen ('Nachwuchsgruppe Dr Alexander Probst'). For the purpose of Open Access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright license to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.

Senior and Reviewing Editor

  1. Philip A Cole, Harvard Medical School, United States

Reviewer

  1. Patrick Forterre, Institut Pasteur, France

Publication history

  1. Preprint posted: January 21, 2021 (view preprint)
  2. Received: February 11, 2021
  3. Accepted: March 13, 2022
  4. Version of Record published: April 8, 2022 (version 1)

Copyright

© 2022, Meyer et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 588
    Page views
  • 60
    Downloads
  • 1
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Benjamin H Meyer
  2. Panagiotis S Adam
  3. Ben A Wagstaff
  4. George E Kolyfetis
  5. Alexander J Probst
  6. Sonja V Albers
  7. Helge C Dorfmueller
(2022)
Agl24 is an ancient archaeal homolog of the eukaryotic N-glycan chitobiose synthesis enzymes
eLife 11:e67448.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67448

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Meiling Wu, Anda Zhao ... Dongyun Shi
    Research Article

    Antioxidant intervention is considered to inhibit reactive oxygen species (ROS) and alleviates hyperglycemia. Paradoxically, moderate exercise can produce ROS to improve diabetes. The exact redox mechanism of these two different approaches remains largely unclear. Here, by comparing exercise and antioxidants intervention on type 2 diabetic rats, we found moderate exercise upregulated compensatory antioxidant capability and reached a higher level of redox balance in the liver. In contrast, antioxidant intervention achieved a low-level redox balance by inhibiting oxidative stress. Both of these two interventions could promote glucose catabolism and inhibit gluconeogenesis through activation of hepatic AMPK signaling, therefore ameliorating diabetes. During exercise, different levels of ROS generated by exercise have differential regulations on the activity and expression of hepatic AMPK. Moderate exercise-derived ROS promoted hepatic AMPK glutathionylation activation. However, excessive exercise increased oxidative damage and inhibited the activity and expression of AMPK. Overall, our results illustrate that both exercise and antioxidant intervention improve blood glucose in diabetes by promoting redox balance, despite different levels of redox balance. These results indicate that the AMPK signaling activation, combined with oxidative damage markers, could act as a sensitive biomarker, reflecting the threshold of redox balance defining effective treatment in diabetes. These findings provide theoretical evidence for the precise treatment of diabetes by antioxidants and exercise.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Edmundo G Vides, Ayan Adhikari ... Suzanne R Pfeffer
    Research Advance

    Activating mutations in the Leucine Rich Repeat Kinase 2 (LRRK2) cause Parkinson's disease and previously we showed that activated LRRK2 phosphorylates a subset of Rab GTPases (Steger et al., 2017). Moreover, Golgi-associated Rab29 can recruit LRRK2 to the surface of the Golgi and activate it there for both auto- and Rab substrate phosphorylation. Here we define the precise Rab29 binding region of the LRRK2 Armadillo domain between residues 360-450 and show that this domain, termed 'Site #1', can also bind additional LRRK2 substrates, Rab8A and Rab10. Moreover, we identify a distinct, N-terminal, higher affinity interaction interface between LRRK2 phosphorylated Rab8 and Rab10 termed 'Site #2', that can retain LRRK2 on membranes in cells to catalyze multiple, subsequent phosphorylation events. Kinase inhibitor washout experiments demonstrate that rapid recovery of kinase activity in cells depends on the ability of LRRK2 to associate with phosphorylated Rab proteins, and phosphorylated Rab8A stimulates LRRK2 phosphorylation of Rab10 in vitro. Reconstitution of purified LRRK2 recruitment onto planar lipid bilayers decorated with Rab10 protein demonstrates cooperative association of only active LRRK2 with phospho-Rab10-containing membrane surfaces. These experiments reveal a feed-forward pathway that provides spatial control and membrane activation of LRRK2 kinase activity.