1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
  2. Computational and Systems Biology

Simple biochemical features underlie transcriptional activation domain diversity and dynamic, fuzzy binding to Mediator

  1. Adrian L Sanborn  Is a corresponding author
  2. Benjamin T Yeh
  3. Jordan T Feigerle
  4. Cynthia V Hao
  5. Raphael J L Townshend
  6. Erez Lieberman-Aiden
  7. Ron O Dror
  8. Roger D Kornberg  Is a corresponding author
  1. Stanford University, United States
  2. Baylor College of Medicine, United States
  3. Stanford University School of Medicine, United States
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68068
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Adrian L Sanborn
  2. Benjamin T Yeh
  3. Jordan T Feigerle
  4. Cynthia V Hao
  5. Raphael J L Townshend
  6. Erez Lieberman-Aiden
  7. Ron O Dror
  8. Roger D Kornberg
(2021)
Simple biochemical features underlie transcriptional activation domain diversity and dynamic, fuzzy binding to Mediator
eLife 10:e68068.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68068
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

Gene activator proteins comprise distinct DNA-binding and transcriptional activation domains (ADs). Because few ADs have been described, we tested domains tiling all yeast transcription factors for activation in vivo and identified 150 ADs. By mRNA display, we showed that 73% of ADs bound the Med15 subunit of Mediator, and that binding strength was correlated with activation. AD-Mediator interaction in vitro was unaffected by a large excess of free activator protein, pointing to a dynamic mechanism of interaction. Structural modeling showed that ADs interact with Med15 without shape complementarity ('fuzzy' binding). ADs shared no sequence motifs, but mutagenesis revealed biochemical and structural constraints. Finally, a neural network trained on AD sequences accurately predicted ADs in human proteins and in other yeast proteins, including chromosomal proteins and chromatin remodeling complexes. These findings solve the longstanding enigma of AD structure and function and provide a rationale for their role in biology.

Data availability

All data from in vivo activation and in vitro screens are included in tables as source data files. PDB files of structural models of Med15-AD interactions are included in Figure 6-source data 2. All sequencing data have been deposited in GEO, under the accession code GSE173156.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Adrian L Sanborn

    Department of Structural Biology, Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    For correspondence
    a@adriansanborn.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  2. Benjamin T Yeh

    David Geffen School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9397-6392

  3. Jordan T Feigerle

    Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  4. Cynthia V Hao

    Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2183-0698

  5. Raphael J L Townshend

    Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  6. Erez Lieberman-Aiden

    Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  7. Ron O Dror

    Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  8. Roger D Kornberg

    Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, United States
    For correspondence
    kornberg@stanford.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2425-7519

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01-DK121366 and R01-AI021144)

  • Roger D Kornberg

U.S. Department of Energy (Office of Science Graduate Student Research (SCGSR) program (DE-SC0014664))

  • Raphael J L Townshend

National Institutes of Health (F32-GM126704)

  • Jordan T Feigerle

National Institutes of Health (R01-GM127359)

  • Ron O Dror

U.S. Department of Energy (Scientific Discovery through Advanced Computing (SciDAC) program)

  • Ron O Dror

National Science Foundation (Physics Frontiers Center Award (PHY1427654))

  • Erez Lieberman-Aiden

Welch Foundation (Q-1866)

  • Erez Lieberman-Aiden

U.S. Department of Agriculture (Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Grant (2017-05741))

  • Erez Lieberman-Aiden

National Institutes of Health (4D Nucleome Grant (U01HL130010))

  • Erez Lieberman-Aiden

National Institutes of Health (Encyclopedia of DNA Elements Mapping Center Award (UM1HG009375))

  • Erez Lieberman-Aiden

U.S. Department of Defense (National Defense Science & Engineering Graduate (NDSEG) Fellowship)

  • Adrian L Sanborn

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Sanborn et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 7,800
    views
  • 949
    downloads
  • 111
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Adrian L Sanborn
  2. Benjamin T Yeh
  3. Jordan T Feigerle
  4. Cynthia V Hao
  5. Raphael J L Townshend
  6. Erez Lieberman-Aiden
  7. Ron O Dror
  8. Roger D Kornberg
(2021)
Simple biochemical features underlie transcriptional activation domain diversity and dynamic, fuzzy binding to Mediator
eLife 10:e68068.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68068

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68068

Categories and tags

Research organisms

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression

    Transcriptional inhibition after irradiation occurs preferentially at highly expressed genes in a manner dependent on cell cycle progression

    Zulong Chen, Xin Wang ... Jessica K Tyler
    Research Article

    In response to DNA double-strand damage, ongoing transcription is inhibited to facilitate accurate DNA repair while transcriptional recovery occurs after DNA repair is complete. However, the mechanisms at play and the identity of the transcripts being regulated in this manner are unclear. In contrast to the situation following UV damage, we found that transcriptional recovery after ionizing radiation (IR) occurs in a manner independent of the HIRA histone chaperone. Sequencing of the nascent transcripts identified a programmed transcriptional response, where certain transcripts and pathways are rapidly downregulated after IR, while other transcripts and pathways are upregulated. Specifically, most of the loss of nascent transcripts occurring after IR is due to inhibition of transcriptional initiation of the highly transcribed histone genes and the rDNA. To identify factors responsible for transcriptional inhibition after IR in an unbiased manner, we performed a whole genome gRNA library CRISPR/Cas9 screen. Many of the top hits on our screen were factors required for protein neddylation. However, at short times after inhibition of neddylation, transcriptional inhibition still occurred after IR, even though neddylation was effectively inhibited. Persistent inhibition of neddylation blocked transcriptional inhibition after IR, and it also leads to cell cycle arrest. Indeed, we uncovered that many inhibitors and conditions that lead to cell cycle arrest in G1 or G2 phase also prevent transcriptional inhibition after IR. As such, it appears that transcriptional inhibition after IR occurs preferentially at highly expressed genes in cycling cells.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Genetics and Genomics

    Regulatory genome annotation of 33 insect species

    Hasiba Asma, Ellen Tieke ... Marc S Halfon
    Tools and Resources

    Annotation of newly sequenced genomes frequently includes genes, but rarely covers important non-coding genomic features such as the cis-regulatory modules—e.g., enhancers and silencers—that regulate gene expression. Here, we begin to remedy this situation by developing a workflow for rapid initial annotation of insect regulatory sequences, and provide a searchable database resource with enhancer predictions for 33 genomes. Using our previously developed SCRMshaw computational enhancer prediction method, we predict over 2.8 million regulatory sequences along with the tissues where they are expected to be active, in a set of insect species ranging over 360 million years of evolution. Extensive analysis and validation of the data provides several lines of evidence suggesting that we achieve a high true-positive rate for enhancer prediction. One, we show that our predictions target specific loci, rather than random genomic locations. Two, we predict enhancers in orthologous loci across a diverged set of species to a significantly higher degree than random expectation would allow. Three, we demonstrate that our predictions are highly enriched for regions of accessible chromatin. Four, we achieve a validation rate in excess of 70% using in vivo reporter gene assays. As we continue to annotate both new tissues and new species, our regulatory annotation resource will provide a rich source of data for the research community and will have utility for both small-scale (single gene, single species) and large-scale (many genes, many species) studies of gene regulation. In particular, the ability to search for functionally related regulatory elements in orthologous loci should greatly facilitate studies of enhancer evolution even among distantly related species.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression

    An anciently diverged family of RNA binding proteins maintain correct splicing of a class of ultra-long exons through cryptic splice site repression

    Chileleko Siachisumo, Sara Luzzi ... David J Elliott
    Research Advance

    Previously, we showed that the germ cell-specific nuclear protein RBMXL2 represses cryptic splicing patterns during meiosis and is required for male fertility (Ehrmann et al., 2019). Here, we show that in somatic cells the similar yet ubiquitously expressed RBMX protein has similar functions. RBMX regulates a distinct class of exons that exceed the median human exon size. RBMX protein-RNA interactions are enriched within ultra-long exons, particularly within genes involved in genome stability, and repress the selection of cryptic splice sites that would compromise gene function. The RBMX gene is silenced during male meiosis due to sex chromosome inactivation. To test whether RBMXL2 might replace the function of RBMX during meiosis we induced expression of RBMXL2 and the more distantly related RBMY protein in somatic cells, finding each could rescue aberrant patterns of RNA processing caused by RBMX depletion. The C-terminal disordered domain of RBMXL2 is sufficient to rescue proper splicing control after RBMX depletion. Our data indicate that RBMX and RBMXL2 have parallel roles in somatic tissues and the germline that must have been conserved for at least 200 million years of mammalian evolution. We propose RBMX family proteins are particularly important for the splicing inclusion of some ultra-long exons with increased intrinsic susceptibility to cryptic splice site selection.