1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
  2. Computational and Systems Biology

Simple biochemical features underlie transcriptional activation domain diversity and dynamic, fuzzy binding to Mediator

  1. Adrian L Sanborn  Is a corresponding author
  2. Benjamin T Yeh
  3. Jordan T Feigerle
  4. Cynthia V Hao
  5. Raphael J L Townshend
  6. Erez Lieberman-Aiden
  7. Ron O Dror
  8. Roger D Kornberg  Is a corresponding author
  1. Stanford University, United States
  2. Baylor College of Medicine, United States
  3. Stanford University School of Medicine, United States
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68068
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Adrian L Sanborn
  2. Benjamin T Yeh
  3. Jordan T Feigerle
  4. Cynthia V Hao
  5. Raphael J L Townshend
  6. Erez Lieberman-Aiden
  7. Ron O Dror
  8. Roger D Kornberg
(2021)
Simple biochemical features underlie transcriptional activation domain diversity and dynamic, fuzzy binding to Mediator
eLife 10:e68068.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68068
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

Gene activator proteins comprise distinct DNA-binding and transcriptional activation domains (ADs). Because few ADs have been described, we tested domains tiling all yeast transcription factors for activation in vivo and identified 150 ADs. By mRNA display, we showed that 73% of ADs bound the Med15 subunit of Mediator, and that binding strength was correlated with activation. AD-Mediator interaction in vitro was unaffected by a large excess of free activator protein, pointing to a dynamic mechanism of interaction. Structural modeling showed that ADs interact with Med15 without shape complementarity ('fuzzy' binding). ADs shared no sequence motifs, but mutagenesis revealed biochemical and structural constraints. Finally, a neural network trained on AD sequences accurately predicted ADs in human proteins and in other yeast proteins, including chromosomal proteins and chromatin remodeling complexes. These findings solve the longstanding enigma of AD structure and function and provide a rationale for their role in biology.

Data availability

All data from in vivo activation and in vitro screens are included in tables as source data files. PDB files of structural models of Med15-AD interactions are included in Figure 6-source data 2. All sequencing data have been deposited in GEO, under the accession code GSE173156.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Adrian L Sanborn

    Department of Structural Biology, Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    For correspondence
    a@adriansanborn.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  2. Benjamin T Yeh

    David Geffen School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9397-6392

  3. Jordan T Feigerle

    Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  4. Cynthia V Hao

    Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2183-0698

  5. Raphael J L Townshend

    Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  6. Erez Lieberman-Aiden

    Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  7. Ron O Dror

    Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  8. Roger D Kornberg

    Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, United States
    For correspondence
    kornberg@stanford.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2425-7519

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01-DK121366 and R01-AI021144)

  • Roger D Kornberg

U.S. Department of Energy (Office of Science Graduate Student Research (SCGSR) program (DE-SC0014664))

  • Raphael J L Townshend

National Institutes of Health (F32-GM126704)

  • Jordan T Feigerle

National Institutes of Health (R01-GM127359)

  • Ron O Dror

U.S. Department of Energy (Scientific Discovery through Advanced Computing (SciDAC) program)

  • Ron O Dror

National Science Foundation (Physics Frontiers Center Award (PHY1427654))

  • Erez Lieberman-Aiden

Welch Foundation (Q-1866)

  • Erez Lieberman-Aiden

U.S. Department of Agriculture (Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Grant (2017-05741))

  • Erez Lieberman-Aiden

National Institutes of Health (4D Nucleome Grant (U01HL130010))

  • Erez Lieberman-Aiden

National Institutes of Health (Encyclopedia of DNA Elements Mapping Center Award (UM1HG009375))

  • Erez Lieberman-Aiden

U.S. Department of Defense (National Defense Science & Engineering Graduate (NDSEG) Fellowship)

  • Adrian L Sanborn

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Sanborn et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 8,395
    views
  • 1,012
    downloads
  • 128
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Adrian L Sanborn
  2. Benjamin T Yeh
  3. Jordan T Feigerle
  4. Cynthia V Hao
  5. Raphael J L Townshend
  6. Erez Lieberman-Aiden
  7. Ron O Dror
  8. Roger D Kornberg
(2021)
Simple biochemical features underlie transcriptional activation domain diversity and dynamic, fuzzy binding to Mediator
eLife 10:e68068.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68068

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68068

Categories and tags

Research organisms

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression

    Nuclear Argonaute protein NRDE-3 switches small RNA partners during embryogenesis to mediate temporal-specific gene regulatory activity

    Shihui Chen, Carolyn Marie Phillips
    Research Article

    RNA interference (RNAi) is a conserved pathway that utilizes Argonaute proteins and their associated small RNAs to exert gene regulatory function on complementary transcripts. While the majority of germline-expressed RNAi proteins reside in perinuclear germ granules, it is unknown whether and how RNAi pathways are spatially organized in other cell types. Here, we find that the small RNA biogenesis machinery is spatially and temporally organized during Caenorhabditis elegans embryogenesis. Specifically, the RNAi factor, SIMR-1, forms visible concentrates during mid-embryogenesis that contain an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, a poly-UG polymerase, and the unloaded nuclear Argonaute protein, NRDE-3. Curiously, coincident with the appearance of the SIMR granules, the small RNAs bound to NRDE-3 switch from predominantly CSR-class 22G-RNAs to ERGO-dependent 22G-RNAs. NRDE-3 binds ERGO-dependent 22G-RNAs in the somatic cells of larvae and adults to silence ERGO-target genes; here we further demonstrate that NRDE-3-bound, CSR-class 22G-RNAs repress transcription in oocytes. Thus, our study defines two separable roles for NRDE-3, targeting germline-expressed genes during oogenesis to promote global transcriptional repression, and switching during embryogenesis to repress recently duplicated genes and retrotransposons in somatic cells, highlighting the plasticity of Argonaute proteins and the need for more precise temporal characterization of Argonaute-small RNA interactions.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Genetics and Genomics

    Transcription: The plusses and minuses of DNA torsion

    Steven Henikoff, David L Levens
    Insight

    A new method for mapping torsion provides insights into the ways that the genome responds to the torsion generated by RNA polymerase II.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression

    The conserved ATPase PCH-2 controls the number and distribution of crossovers by antagonizing their formation in Caenorhabditis elegans

    Bhumil Patel, Maryke Grobler ... Needhi Bhalla
    Research Article

    Meiotic crossover recombination is essential for both accurate chromosome segregation and the generation of new haplotypes for natural selection to act upon. This requirement is known as crossover assurance and is one example of crossover control. While the conserved role of the ATPase, PCH-2, during meiotic prophase has been enigmatic, a universal phenotype when pch-2 or its orthologs are mutated is a change in the number and distribution of meiotic crossovers. Here, we show that PCH-2 controls the number and distribution of crossovers by antagonizing their formation. This antagonism produces different effects at different stages of meiotic prophase: early in meiotic prophase, PCH-2 prevents double-strand breaks from becoming crossover-eligible intermediates, limiting crossover formation at sites of initial double-strand break formation and homolog interactions. Later in meiotic prophase, PCH-2 winnows the number of crossover-eligible intermediates, contributing to the designation of crossovers and ultimately, crossover assurance. We also demonstrate that PCH-2 accomplishes this regulation through the meiotic HORMAD, HIM-3. Our data strongly support a model in which PCH-2’s conserved role is to remodel meiotic HORMADs throughout meiotic prophase to destabilize crossover-eligible precursors and coordinate meiotic recombination with synapsis, ensuring the progressive implementation of meiotic recombination and explaining its function in the pachytene checkpoint and crossover control.