Simple biochemical features underlie transcriptional activation domain diversity and dynamic, fuzzy binding to Mediator
Abstract
Gene activator proteins comprise distinct DNA-binding and transcriptional activation domains (ADs). Because few ADs have been described, we tested domains tiling all yeast transcription factors for activation in vivo and identified 150 ADs. By mRNA display, we showed that 73% of ADs bound the Med15 subunit of Mediator, and that binding strength was correlated with activation. AD-Mediator interaction in vitro was unaffected by a large excess of free activator protein, pointing to a dynamic mechanism of interaction. Structural modeling showed that ADs interact with Med15 without shape complementarity ('fuzzy' binding). ADs shared no sequence motifs, but mutagenesis revealed biochemical and structural constraints. Finally, a neural network trained on AD sequences accurately predicted ADs in human proteins and in other yeast proteins, including chromosomal proteins and chromatin remodeling complexes. These findings solve the longstanding enigma of AD structure and function and provide a rationale for their role in biology.
Data availability
All data from in vivo activation and in vitro screens are included in tables as source data files. PDB files of structural models of Med15-AD interactions are included in Figure 6-source data 2. All sequencing data have been deposited in GEO, under the accession code GSE173156.
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
National Institutes of Health (R01-DK121366 and R01-AI021144)
- Roger D Kornberg
U.S. Department of Energy (Office of Science Graduate Student Research (SCGSR) program (DE-SC0014664))
- Raphael J L Townshend
National Institutes of Health (F32-GM126704)
- Jordan T Feigerle
National Institutes of Health (R01-GM127359)
- Ron O Dror
U.S. Department of Energy (Scientific Discovery through Advanced Computing (SciDAC) program)
- Ron O Dror
National Science Foundation (Physics Frontiers Center Award (PHY1427654))
- Erez Lieberman-Aiden
Welch Foundation (Q-1866)
- Erez Lieberman-Aiden
U.S. Department of Agriculture (Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Grant (2017-05741))
- Erez Lieberman-Aiden
National Institutes of Health (4D Nucleome Grant (U01HL130010))
- Erez Lieberman-Aiden
National Institutes of Health (Encyclopedia of DNA Elements Mapping Center Award (UM1HG009375))
- Erez Lieberman-Aiden
U.S. Department of Defense (National Defense Science & Engineering Graduate (NDSEG) Fellowship)
- Adrian L Sanborn
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Reviewing Editor
- Alan G Hinnebusch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, United States
Version history
- Received: March 3, 2021
- Accepted: April 25, 2021
- Accepted Manuscript published: April 27, 2021 (version 1)
- Accepted Manuscript updated: April 30, 2021 (version 2)
- Version of Record published: May 20, 2021 (version 3)
Copyright
© 2021, Sanborn et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 6,976
- views
-
- 869
- downloads
-
- 89
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Cell Biology
- Chromosomes and Gene Expression
Heat stress is a major threat to global crop production, and understanding its impact on plant fertility is crucial for developing climate-resilient crops. Despite the known negative effects of heat stress on plant reproduction, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain poorly understood. Here, we investigated the impact of elevated temperature on centromere structure and chromosome segregation during meiosis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Consistent with previous studies, heat stress leads to a decline in fertility and micronuclei formation in pollen mother cells. Our results reveal that elevated temperature causes a decrease in the amount of centromeric histone and the kinetochore protein BMF1 at meiotic centromeres with increasing temperature. Furthermore, we show that heat stress increases the duration of meiotic divisions and prolongs the activity of the spindle assembly checkpoint during meiosis I, indicating an impaired efficiency of the kinetochore attachments to spindle microtubules. Our analysis of mutants with reduced levels of centromeric histone suggests that weakened centromeres sensitize plants to elevated temperature, resulting in meiotic defects and reduced fertility even at moderate temperatures. These results indicate that the structure and functionality of meiotic centromeres in Arabidopsis are highly sensitive to heat stress, and suggest that centromeres and kinetochores may represent a critical bottleneck in plant adaptation to increasing temperatures.
-
- Chromosomes and Gene Expression
Splicing is the stepwise molecular process by which introns are removed from pre-mRNA and exons are joined together to form mature mRNA sequences. The ordering and spatial distribution of these steps remain controversial, with opposing models suggesting splicing occurs either during or after transcription. We used single-molecule RNA FISH, expansion microscopy, and live-cell imaging to reveal the spatiotemporal distribution of nascent transcripts in mammalian cells. At super-resolution levels, we found that pre-mRNA formed clouds around the transcription site. These clouds indicate the existence of a transcription-site-proximal zone through which RNA move more slowly than in the nucleoplasm. Full-length pre-mRNA undergo continuous splicing as they move through this zone following transcription, suggesting a model in which splicing can occur post-transcriptionally but still within the proximity of the transcription site, thus seeming co-transcriptional by most assays. These results may unify conflicting reports of co-transcriptional versus post-transcriptional splicing.