1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
  2. Computational and Systems Biology

Simple biochemical features underlie transcriptional activation domain diversity and dynamic, fuzzy binding to Mediator

  1. Adrian L Sanborn  Is a corresponding author
  2. Benjamin T Yeh
  3. Jordan T Feigerle
  4. Cynthia V Hao
  5. Raphael J L Townshend
  6. Erez Lieberman-Aiden
  7. Ron O Dror
  8. Roger D Kornberg  Is a corresponding author
  1. Stanford University, United States
  2. Baylor College of Medicine, United States
  3. Stanford University School of Medicine, United States
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68068
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Adrian L Sanborn
  2. Benjamin T Yeh
  3. Jordan T Feigerle
  4. Cynthia V Hao
  5. Raphael J L Townshend
  6. Erez Lieberman-Aiden
  7. Ron O Dror
  8. Roger D Kornberg
(2021)
Simple biochemical features underlie transcriptional activation domain diversity and dynamic, fuzzy binding to Mediator
eLife 10:e68068.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68068
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

Gene activator proteins comprise distinct DNA-binding and transcriptional activation domains (ADs). Because few ADs have been described, we tested domains tiling all yeast transcription factors for activation in vivo and identified 150 ADs. By mRNA display, we showed that 73% of ADs bound the Med15 subunit of Mediator, and that binding strength was correlated with activation. AD-Mediator interaction in vitro was unaffected by a large excess of free activator protein, pointing to a dynamic mechanism of interaction. Structural modeling showed that ADs interact with Med15 without shape complementarity ('fuzzy' binding). ADs shared no sequence motifs, but mutagenesis revealed biochemical and structural constraints. Finally, a neural network trained on AD sequences accurately predicted ADs in human proteins and in other yeast proteins, including chromosomal proteins and chromatin remodeling complexes. These findings solve the longstanding enigma of AD structure and function and provide a rationale for their role in biology.

Data availability

All data from in vivo activation and in vitro screens are included in tables as source data files. PDB files of structural models of Med15-AD interactions are included in Figure 6-source data 2. All sequencing data have been deposited in GEO, under the accession code GSE173156.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Adrian L Sanborn

    Department of Structural Biology, Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    For correspondence
    a@adriansanborn.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  2. Benjamin T Yeh

    Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9397-6392

  3. Jordan T Feigerle

    Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  4. Cynthia V Hao

    Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2183-0698

  5. Raphael J L Townshend

    Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  6. Erez Lieberman-Aiden

    Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  7. Ron O Dror

    Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  8. Roger D Kornberg

    Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, United States
    For correspondence
    kornberg@stanford.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2425-7519

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01-DK121366 and R01-AI021144)

  • Roger D Kornberg

U.S. Department of Energy (Office of Science Graduate Student Research (SCGSR) program (DE-SC0014664))

  • Raphael J L Townshend

National Institutes of Health (F32-GM126704)

  • Jordan T Feigerle

National Institutes of Health (R01-GM127359)

  • Ron O Dror

U.S. Department of Energy (Scientific Discovery through Advanced Computing (SciDAC) program)

  • Ron O Dror

National Science Foundation (Physics Frontiers Center Award (PHY1427654))

  • Erez Lieberman-Aiden

Welch Foundation (Q-1866)

  • Erez Lieberman-Aiden

U.S. Department of Agriculture (Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Grant (2017-05741))

  • Erez Lieberman-Aiden

National Institutes of Health (4D Nucleome Grant (U01HL130010))

  • Erez Lieberman-Aiden

National Institutes of Health (Encyclopedia of DNA Elements Mapping Center Award (UM1HG009375))

  • Erez Lieberman-Aiden

U.S. Department of Defense (National Defense Science & Engineering Graduate (NDSEG) Fellowship)

  • Adrian L Sanborn

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Sanborn et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 7,818
    views
  • 953
    downloads
  • 111
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Adrian L Sanborn
  2. Benjamin T Yeh
  3. Jordan T Feigerle
  4. Cynthia V Hao
  5. Raphael J L Townshend
  6. Erez Lieberman-Aiden
  7. Ron O Dror
  8. Roger D Kornberg
(2021)
Simple biochemical features underlie transcriptional activation domain diversity and dynamic, fuzzy binding to Mediator
eLife 10:e68068.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68068

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68068

Categories and tags

Research organisms

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression

    Heat Shock Factor 1 forms nuclear condensates and restructures the yeast genome before activating target genes

    Linda S Rubio, Suman Mohajan, David S Gross
    Research Article

    In insects and mammals, 3D genome topology has been linked to transcriptional states yet whether this link holds for other eukaryotes is unclear. Using both ligation proximity and fluorescence microscopy assays, we show that in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Heat Shock Response (HSR) genes dispersed across multiple chromosomes and under the control of Heat Shock Factor (Hsf1) rapidly reposition in cells exposed to acute ethanol stress and engage in concerted, Hsf1-dependent intergenic interactions. Accompanying 3D genome reconfiguration is equally rapid formation of Hsf1-containing condensates. However, in contrast to the transience of Hsf1-driven intergenic interactions that peak within 10–20 min and dissipate within 1 hr in the presence of 8.5% (v/v) ethanol, transcriptional condensates are stably maintained for hours. Moreover, under the same conditions, Pol II occupancy of HSR genes, chromatin remodeling, and RNA expression are detectable only later in the response and peak much later (>1 hr). This contrasts with the coordinate response of HSR genes to thermal stress (39°C) where Pol II occupancy, transcription, histone eviction, intergenic interactions, and formation of Hsf1 condensates are all rapid yet transient (peak within 2.5–10 min and dissipate within 1 hr). Therefore, Hsf1 forms condensates, restructures the genome and transcriptionally activates HSR genes in response to both forms of proteotoxic stress but does so with strikingly different kinetics. In cells subjected to ethanol stress, Hsf1 forms condensates and repositions target genes before transcriptionally activating them.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression

    The Smc5/6 complex counteracts R-loop formation at highly transcribed genes in cooperation with RNase H2

    Shamayita Roy, Hemanta Adhikary ... Damien D'Amours
    Research Article

    The R-loop is a common transcriptional by-product that consists of an RNA-DNA duplex joined to a displaced strand of genomic DNA. While the effects of R-loops on health and disease are well established, there is still an incomplete understanding of the cellular processes responsible for their removal from eukaryotic genomes. Here, we show that a core regulator of chromosome architecture -the Smc5/6 complex- plays a crucial role in the removal of R-loop structures formed during gene transcription. Consistent with this, budding yeast mutants defective in the Smc5/6 complex and enzymes involved in R-loop resolution show strong synthetic interactions and accumulate high levels of RNA-DNA hybrid structures in their chromosomes. Importantly, we demonstrate that the Smc5/6 complex acts on specific types of RNA-DNA hybrid structures in vivo and promotes R-loop degradation by the RNase H2 enzyme in vitro. Collectively, our results reveal a crucial role for the Smc5/6 complex in the removal of toxic R-loops formed at highly transcribed genes and telomeres.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression

    A comparative study of the cryo-EM structures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and human anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C)

    Ester Vazquez-Fernandez, Jing Yang ... David Barford
    Research Article

    The anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) is a large multi-subunit E3 ubiquitin ligase that controls progression through the cell cycle by orchestrating the timely proteolysis of mitotic cyclins and other cell cycle regulatory proteins. Although structures of multiple human APC/C complexes have been extensively studied over the past decade, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae APC/C has been less extensively investigated. Here, we describe medium resolution structures of three S. cerevisiae APC/C complexes: unphosphorylated apo-APC/C and the ternary APC/CCDH1-substrate complex, and phosphorylated apo-APC/C. Whereas the overall architectures of human and S. cerevisiae APC/C are conserved, as well as the mechanism of CDH1 inhibition by CDK-phosphorylation, specific variations exist, including striking differences in the mechanism of coactivator-mediated stimulation of E2 binding, and the activation of APC/CCDC20 by phosphorylation. In contrast to human APC/C in which coactivator induces a conformational change of the catalytic module APC2:APC11 to allow E2 binding, in S. cerevisiae apo-APC/C the catalytic module is already positioned to bind E2. Furthermore, we find no evidence of a phospho-regulatable auto-inhibitory segment of APC1, that in the unphosphorylated human APC/C, sterically blocks the CDC20C-box binding site of APC8. Thus, although the functions of APC/C are conserved from S. cerevisiae to humans, molecular details relating to their regulatory mechanisms differ.