The development of the vertebrate face during embryogenesis requires the integration of gene regulatory programs and signaling interactions across different tissue layers to regulate normal growth and morphogenesis (Chai and Maxson, 2006; Dixon et al., 2011). The bulk of the face is derived from neural crest cells (NCCs), which migrate into the nascent mandibular, maxillary, and frontonasal facial prominences. Recent studies have indicated the cranial NCCs (CNCCs), residing within distinct facial prominences, are molecularly similar, genetically poised, and awaiting additional signaling information for their continued development (Minoux et al., 2017; Minoux and Rijli, 2010). These critical signals are provided by surrounding and adjacent tissues, especially the forebrain, endoderm, and ectoderm (Le Douarin et al., 2004). With respect to the ectoderm, studies in chick have indicated the presence of a frontonasal ectodermal zone, defined by the juxtaposition of Fgf8 and Shh expressing domains, that can direct facial outgrowth and patterning (Hu and Marcucio, 2009; Hu et al., 2003). The ectoderm is also a critical source of Wnt signaling that is required for continued facial outgrowth and patterning, exemplified by the lack of almost all craniofacial structures arising when Wls (Gpr177) is removed from the facial ectoderm (Goodnough et al., 2014; Reynolds et al., 2019). Further evidence for an essential role of the ectoderm in craniofacial development comes from genetic analysis of pathology associated with human syndromic orofacial clefting. Specifically, mutations in IRF6 (Kondo et al., 2002) and GRHL3 (Peyrard-Janvid et al., 2014) are associated with van der Woude Syndrome, while TRP63 mutations result in ectodermal dysplasias with associated facial clefting (Celli et al., 1999). Notably, all three of these human genes encode transcription factors which exhibit much stronger expression in the facial ectoderm than in the underlying neural crest (Hooper et al., 2020; Leach et al., 2017). Studies of mouse facial dysmorphology have also shown the importance of additional genes with biased expression in the ectoderm—including Sfn, Jag2, Wnt9b, and Esrp1—that regulate differentiation, signaling, and splicing (Bebee et al., 2015; Jiang et al., 1998; Jin et al., 2012; Lee et al., 2013; Lee et al., 2020; Richardson et al., 2006). Indeed, the interplay between surface ectoderm and underlying NCCs provides a molecular platform for the craniofacial diversity apparent within the vertebrate clade, but also serves as a system which is frequently disrupted to cause human craniofacial birth defects. Therefore, identifying the regulatory mechanisms and factors involved in coordinating NCC:ectoderm interactions is a prerequisite for uncovering the molecular nodes susceptible to perturbation.

The AP-2 transcription factor family represents an intriguing group of regulatory molecules with strong links to ectodermal development (Eckert et al., 2005). Indeed, previous analyses have indicated that AP-2 genes may be an ancestral transcriptional regulator of ectoderm development in chordates predating the development of the neural crest in the cephalochordate Amphioxus and the ascidian Ciona (Imai et al., 2017; Meulemans and Bronner-Fraser, 2002; Meulemans and Bronner-Fraser, 2004). Subsequently, it has been postulated that this gene family has been co-opted into the regulatory network required for neural crest development in the vertebrates, where it may serve as one of the master regulators of this lineage (Meulemans and Bronner-Fraser, 2002; Meulemans and Bronner-Fraser, 2004; Van Otterloo et al., 2012). Therefore, in vertebrates, AP-2 family expression is often observed in both the non-neural ectoderm as well as the neural crest. Amphioxus possesses a single AP-2 gene, but in mammals such as mouse and human there are five family members, Tfap2a-e encoding the proteins AP-2α-ε, respectively (Eckert et al., 2005; Meulemans and Bronner-Fraser, 2002). All mammalian AP-2 proteins have very similar DNA sequence preferences and bind as dimers to a consensus motif GCCNNNGGC, except for AP-2δ which is the least conserved family member (Badis et al., 2009; Williams and Tjian, 1991; Zhao et al., 2001). Amongst these five genes, Tfap2a and Tfap2b show the highest levels of expression in the developing mouse embryonic facial tissues with lower levels of Tfap2c and essentially undetectable transcripts from Tfap2d and Tfap2e (Hooper et al., 2020; Van Otterloo et al., 2018). Importantly, mutations in human TFAP2A and TFAP2B, are also linked to the human conditions Branchio-Oculo-Facial Syndrome (Milunsky et al., 2008) and Char Syndrome (Satoda et al., 2000) respectively, conditions which both have a craniofacial component. TFAP2A has also been linked to non-syndromic orofacial clefting (MIM 119530) (Davies et al., 1995; Davies et al., 2004).

Previous single mouse knockout studies have indicated that the loss of Tfap2a has the most significant effect on craniofacial development with most of the upper face absent as well as split mandible and tongue (Schorle et al., 1996; Zhang et al., 1996). Tfap2b knockouts do not have gross morphological defects associated with craniofacial development (Hong et al., 2008; Moser et al., 1997; Zhao et al., 2011), nor do pertinent knockouts of any of the three other AP-2 genes (Feng et al., 2009; Guttormsen et al., 2008; Hesse et al., 2011). We have further investigated the tissue specific requirements for Tfap2a in face formation and determined that its loss in the neural crest resulted in cleft palate, but otherwise only minor defects in the development of the facial skeleton (Brewer et al., 2004). Next, we investigated whether the co-expression of Tfap2b might compensate for the loss of Tfap2a alone by deriving mice lacking both genes in NCCs. Although these NCC double knockout mice had more severe craniofacial defects, including a split upper face and mandible, the phenotype was still less severe than that observed with the complete loss of Tfap2a alone (Van Otterloo et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 1996). In contrast, targeting Tfap2a in the surface ectoderm in the region of the face associated with the lens placode causes a mild form of orofacial clefting (Pontoriero et al., 2008). These findings suggested that the ectoderm may be an additional major site of Tfap2a action during mouse facial development, and by analogy with the NCC studies, that the phenotype could be exacerbated by the additional loss of Tfap2b.

Therefore, here we have assessed how craniofacial development is affected upon simultaneous removal of Tfap2a and Tfap2b in the embryonic ectoderm using the Cre transgene, Crect, which is expressed from E8.5 onwards throughout this tissue layer. Our results show that the expression of these two AP-2 proteins in the ectoderm has a profound effect on the underlying NCC-derived craniofacial skeleton and strengthens the association between the AP-2 family and ectodermal development and function. Furthermore, we examined how the loss of these two AP-2 transcription factors impacted the ectodermal craniofacial gene regulatory network by studying changes in chromatin accessibility and gene expression between control and mutant mice. These studies reveal critical targets of AP-2 within the facial ectoderm, especially WNT pathway genes, and further indicate the necessity of appropriate ectodermal:mesenchymal communication for growth, morphogenesis, and patterning of the vertebrate face.

Development of the vertebrate head requires critical regulatory interactions between various tissue layers, particularly the ectoderm and underlying neural crest derived mesenchyme. Here, we show that AP-2 transcription factors are an essential component of a mouse early embryonic ectoderm GRN directing growth and morphogenesis of the underlying facial prominence tissues. Specifically, combined conditional loss of the two most highly expressed members of the family within the ectoderm, Tfap2a and Tfap2b, results in a failure of the facial prominences to meet and fuse productively. Thus, the mandibular processes fail to meet at the midline, resulting in a wide separation between the two halves of the lower jaw and a bifid tongue. In the upper face, the maxillary, and lateral and medial nasal prominences fail to align at the lambdoid junction, resulting in an extensive bilateral cleft and significant midfacial dysmorphology. In addition to the orofacial clefting phenotypes, there was also loss of the normal hinge region between the mandible and maxilla resulting in syngnathia, and a duplication of Meckel’s cartilage. Overall, the data indicate that appropriate growth, morphogenesis, and patterning of the facial prominences are all severely disrupted. The finding that AP-2α and AP-2ß work redundantly in the facial ectoderm complements studies showing that they can also work together within the cranial neural crest to control facial development (Van Otterloo et al., 2018). In these previous studies, the neural crest specific deletion of these factors resulted in a different type of orofacial cleft—an upper midfacial cleft—but in common with the EDKO mutants also caused syngnathia. The observations that AP-2α and AP-2ß have distinct as well as overlapping functions with both the neural crest and ectoderm for mouse facial development also inform both human facial clefting genetics and evolutionary biology. With respect to humans, TFAP2A mutations are associated with Branchio-Oculo-Facial Syndrome (MIM, 113620), while TFAP2B is mutated in Char Syndrome (MIM, 169100) (Satoda et al., 2000). Although both syndromes have craniofacial components to their pathology, including changes to the nasal bridge and the position of the external ears, only mutations in TFAP2A are associated with orofacial clefting, usually lateral. These findings support a more significant role for TFAP2A in influencing orofacial clefting in both mouse and human and suggest that it is the reduction of AP-2α function in the ectoderm—rather than the NCC —that is associated with this human birth defect.

In the context of chordate evolution, the prevailing hypothesis is that AP-2 has an ‘ancestral’ role within the non-neural ectoderm followed by an ‘evolved’ role within the neural crest cell lineage of vertebrates (Meulemans and Bronner-Fraser, 2002; Van Otterloo et al., 2012). The current studies further support that AP-2 proteins have critical roles within the embryonic ectoderm that have been conserved from cephalochordates and tunicates through to mammals. Alongside established roles for AP-2 transcription factors in NCCs (Brewer et al., 2004; Martino et al., 2016; Prescott et al., 2015; Van Otterloo et al., 2018), these observations raise the possibility that there may be a coordinated and complex interplay between AP-2 activity in the two tissue layers that has been conserved during evolution. The combined function of the two AP-2 factors in craniofacial development also reflects the more severe pathology resulting from the loss of more than one AP-2 gene that has been documented in other mouse developmental systems including the eye, nervous system, and skin (Hicks et al., 2018; Schmidt et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2008; Zainolabidin et al., 2017). The propensity of the AP-2 proteins to act in concert has also been observed in additional vertebrate species, particularly in the chick and zebrafish, where loss of more than one gene uncovers joint functions in neural crest, face, and melanocyte development (Hoffman et al., 2007; Knight et al., 2005; Li and Cornell, 2007; Rothstein and Simoes-Costa, 2020; Van Otterloo et al., 2010). Notably, in the zebrafish, previous studies have documented an interaction between AP-2α and AP-2ß during cranial NCC development (Knight et al., 2005). Unlike in the mouse, AP-2ß’s role was confined to the surface ectoderm, based on gene expression and transplant experiments. However, more recent single-cell transcriptome profiling has identified tfap2b expression in the zebrafish cranial neural crest (Mitchell et al., 2021), suggesting features between these models (i.e. zebrafish and mouse) may be more conserved than previously thought.

The joint function of these AP-2 proteins in controlling specific aspects of gene expression presumably reflects the similar consensus sequence recognized by all family members (Badis et al., 2009; Bosher et al., 1996; Williams and Tjian, 1991). Thus, the absence of AP-2ß alone may not cause major developmental issues in mouse facial development due to the ability of the remaining AP-2α protein to bind and regulate shared critical genes. However, loss of both proteins would lower the amount of functional AP-2 protein available for normal gene regulation. The hypothesis that particular levels of AP-2 are required for achieving critical thresholds of gene activity is also supported by the different phenotypes uncovered by the loss of particular Tfap2a and Tfap2b allelic combinations. Thus, while the loss of one allele of Tfap2a—or both alleles of Tfap2b—in the ectoderm is tolerated in the context of facial development, the combined loss of all three of these four alleles is not, and the phenotypes become more severe when all four alleles are defective. We note that this phenomenon was also observed when these genes were targeted in the neural crest (Van Otterloo et al., 2018). In both the NCCs and ectoderm the role of AP-2α seemed to be more significant than AP-2ß based on the phenotypes observed—since the presence of one functional allele of Tfap2a resulted in less severe pathology than the converse where only a single productive Tfap2b allele was expressed. The reasons behind the more prominent function of AP-2α in these systems remains unclear, especially since the two proteins are over 70% identical and bind to the same DNA recognition sequences. Nevertheless, it is possible that some alterations in the mRNA and/or amino acid sequence could differentially affect stability, localization, or interaction with cofactors. Alternatively, there might be subtle differences in the timing, distribution, or levels of functional AP-2α and AP-2ß protein in these tissues that account for the changes in susceptibility to pathology. Further studies will be needed to determine how the consequence of Tfap2a loss is greater than Tfap2b.

One notable observation, though, is that no unique and irreplaceable function exists for any AP-2α/ß heterodimers in the mouse ectoderm or neural crest. This conclusion is based on the finding that loss of Tfap2b—a situation that would impact both AP-2ß homodimers and AP-2α/ß heterodimers—does not impact facial development in these experiments. Finally, the sensitivity of facial development to changes in the allelic dosage of the AP-2 proteins makes this gene family a potential contributor to the evolution of facial shape. Indeed, this conjecture is supported by studies comparing genetic and morphological changes in different threespine stickleback (Erickson et al., 2018) and Arctic charr (Ahi et al., 2015) populations adapted to diverse environmental conditions, as well as by comparative studies of IPS-derived cranial neural crest cells from human and chimp, which suggest that changes in AP-2 expression and/or gene targets correlate with facial shape changes (Prescott et al., 2015).

The severe EDKO phenotypes also indicated that the presence or absence of these AP-2 transcription factors in the ectoderm must have a profound influence on chromatin dynamics and gene expression. To probe this in depth, ATAC-seq, H3K4me3 ChIP-seq, and RNAseq were performed on control samples derived from the embryonic mouse face, to correlate respectively chromatin accessibility, active promoter marks, and gene expression. These datasets revealed chromatin signatures that were tissue generic as well as a subset that were specific for the E11.5 facial ectoderm with the latter enriched for P53/P63/P73, AP-2, TEAD, GRHL, and PBX binding motifs. In this respect binding motifs for P53, AP-2, and TEAD family members have previously been found associated with ectodermal-specific gene regulatory pathways in embryonic skin (Fan et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2006; Wang et al., 2008; Yuan et al., 2020). Notably, our studies extend and refine the previous genome-wide analysis of embryonic skin conducted by Fan et al., 2018 by focusing on the E11.5 facial ectoderm, enabling the detection of additional binding motifs for GRHL and PBX TF family members that are critical craniofacial patterning genes. We complemented the analysis of control samples by performing equivalent ATAC-seq and RNAseq studies on EDKO facial ectoderm or whole facial prominences, respectively. Deletion of these two transcription factors led to a significant (5%) genome-wide loss of chromatin accessibility that was centered on AP-2 consensus motifs, particularly in potential distal enhancer elements. Despite changes in the accessibility of AP-2 binding sites, motifs for P53 and TEAD family members were still highly enriched in the EDKO mutant samples. These observations provide support for previous ATAC-seq analysis of deltaNp63 mutants which hypothesized that the AP-2 and p63 programs may function independently at the protein level to regulate chromatin accessibility in embryonic ectoderm (Fan et al., 2018). Many of the genes linked to AP-2 binding motifs were associated with annotations aligned to skin development, such as keratins, cadherins, and gap junction proteins. However, further analysis of the gene list also revealed an evolutionary conserved group of AP-2-binding motifs connected with WNT-related genes, many associated with craniofacial development.

A strong link between AP-2 function, skin development, and WNT pathway expression was also detected in the RNAseq datasets. Changes between control and EDKO mutants in the expression of various keratin genes as well Gjb6, Trp63, Grhl3, and Lin28a suggest a failure or delay in appropriate skin differentiation in the latter embryos. Further, loss of AP-2α/ß caused a significant reduction in expression of many Wnt ligands within the facial ectoderm including Wnt3, Wnt6, Wnt9b, and Wnt10a. Importantly, these four Wnt genes have been associated with human orofacial clefting (Reynolds et al., 2019), and alterations of Wnt9b also cause mouse CL/P (Juriloff et al., 2005; Juriloff et al., 2006). The reduced output of WNT signaling from the ectoderm was matched by a reduction of Axin2-LacZ reporter expression in the underlying mesenchyme, and there were also multiple changes in additional WNT components in the mesenchyme suggesting that loss of ectodermal AP-2 expression has significantly disrupted the function of this pathway throughout the developing face. Note that, although Wnt ligand expression is reduced in the ectoderm of EDKO mutants, it is not completely lost. Therefore, the facial pathology is not as severe as that observed with the ectodermal loss of Wls, a gene required for WNT ligand modification and secretion, in which the majority of the face is absent (Goodnough et al., 2014). The presence of teeth in the EDKO mutants (Woodruff et al., 2021)—although abnormal in position and number—also argues against a catastrophic loss of WNT signaling within the oral ectoderm. Further studies will be required to assess how the loss of Tfap2a and Tfap2b in the ectoderm affects other structures that require ectodermal WNT function, such as hair, whiskers, and mammary buds. With respect to facial development, additional evidence for a contribution of the WNT signaling pathway to the AP-2 mutant phenotype was obtained by overexpressing Wnt1 in the EDKO mutant background, which resulted in a significant rescue of the facial dysmorphology and clefting. A previous study also indicated that ectopic Wnt1 expression could rescue CL/P caused by loss of PBX expression (Ferretti et al., 2011), suggesting either that reduced WNT signaling is a common pathogenic mechanism for clefting or that facial growth stimulated by excess WNT signaling can mitigate the defects in juxtaposition and fusion of the facial prominences. Note that normal facial morphology was not fully recapitulated in the EDKO rescue experiments, possibly reflecting that the timing and level of Wnt1 expression was not optimal. We also note that Wnt1 overexpression did not affect clefting of the lower jaw in EAKO and EDKO mice, nor is the expression of genes previously linked with syngnathia and jaw-joint defects, such as Foxc1, Six1, Bmp4, Fgf8, or Dlx (Jeong et al., 2008; Inman et al., 2013; He et al., 2014; Achilleos and Trainor, 2015; Liu et al., 2019; Abe et al., 2021) family members significantly changed in the EDKO model. Therefore, further analysis will be required to uncover the role of ectodermal Tfap2 expression in development of the syngnathia and other mandible defects. Indeed, our data shows that AP-2 directs additional ectodermal programs that also contribute to face formation—including IRX and IRF TF expression—as well as CXCL, EDN, FGF, and NOTCH signaling that presumably contribute to the overall pathology of the EAKO and EDKO mice. Importantly, IRF6—a gene involved in orofacial clefting (Kondo et al., 2002; Zucchero et al., 2004)—has previously been identified as a critical AP-2 target. Studies in human have shown that a polymorphism in an upstream enhancer element either generates or disrupts a binding site for AP-2 proteins, with the latter variant increasing the risk for orofacial clefting (Rahimov et al., 2008). This enhancer is conserved in the mouse, and its accessibility is altered in the EDKO mutant. Further, the expression of Irf6 is also reduced in the EDKO mutants (Supplementary file 3), correlating with the loss of AP-2 binding, and providing a further pathway that might contribute to the overall phenotype. In summary, the combination of ATAC-seq, ChIP-Seq, and expression analyses highlight critical genes that are impacted by loss of AP-2 transcription factors. These data greatly expand our understanding of the gene regulatory circuits occurring in the ectoderm that regulate facial development and underscore a critical role for AP-2α and AP-2ß in controlling appropriate genome access as well as gene expression.

Sequencing data has been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus under accession code GSE199342.

1. 1. Van Otterloo E

   (2022) NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus

   ID GSE199342. ATAC-seq, histone-seq, and RNA-seq of mouse craniofacial tissues.

   https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE199342

1. 1. Bing R
   2. ENCODE Consortium

   (2017) ENCODE

   ENCODE, heart, ATACseq.

   https://doi.org/10.17989/ENCSR820ACB
2. 1. Bing R
   2. ENCODE Consortium

   (2017) ENCODE

   ENCODE, liver, ATACseq.

   https://doi.org/10.17989/ENCSR785NEL
3. 1. Bing R
   2. ENCODE Consortium

   (2017) ENCODE

   ENCODE, hindbrain, ATACseq.

   https://doi.org/10.17989/ENCSR012YAB
4. 1. Bing R
   2. ENCODE Consortium

   (2017) ENCODE

   ENCODE, midbrain, ATACseq.

   https://doi.org/10.17989/ENCSR382RUC
5. 1. Bing R
   2. ENCODE Consortium

   (2017) ENCODE

   ENCODE, forebrain, ATACseq.

   https://doi.org/10.17989/ENCSR273UFV
6. 1. Bing R
   2. ENCODE Consortium

   (2017) ENCODE

   ENCODE, neural tube, ATACseq.

   https://doi.org/10.17989/ENCSR282YTE
7. 1. Bing R
   2. ENCODE Consortium

   (2017) ENCODE

   ENCODE, kidney, ATACseq.

   https://doi.org/10.17989/ENCSR023QZX
8. 1. Bing R
   2. ENCODE Consortium

   (2017) ENCODE

   ENCODE, intestine, ATACseq.

   https://doi.org/10.17989/ENCSR983JWA
9. 1. Hooper J
   2. Li H
   3. Williams T

   (2017) Facebase

   ID FB00000867. Facebase RNAseq.

   https://www.facebase.org/chaise/record/#1/isa:dataset/RID=TJA
10. 1. Li H
    2. Jones KL
    3. Hooper JE
    4. Williams T

    (2019) Facebase

    ID FB00001039. Single cell RNA-sequencing of E11.5 Crect; ROSA26-lacZ mouse fusing upper lip and primary palate.

    https://www.facebase.org/chaise/record/#1/isa:dataset/RID=1-5004

1. 1. Abe M
   2. Cox TC
   3. Firulli AB
   4. Kanai SM
   5. Dahlka J
   6. Lim KC
   7. Engel JD
   8. Clouthier DE

   (2021) GATA3 is essential for separating patterning domains during facial morphogenesis

   Development (Cambridge, England) 148:dev199534.

   https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.199534

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Achilleos A
   2. Trainor PA

   (2015) Mouse Models of Rare Craniofacial Disorders

   Current Topics in Developmental Biology 115:413–458.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.ctdb.2015.07.011

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Ahi EP
   2. Steinhäuser SS
   3. Pálsson A
   4. Franzdóttir SR
   5. Snorrason SS
   6. Maier VH
   7. Jónsson ZO

   (2015) Differential expression of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor pathway associates with craniofacial polymorphism in sympatric Arctic charr

   EvoDevo 6:27.

   https://doi.org/10.1186/s13227-015-0022-6

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Andersson R
   2. Sandelin A

   (2020) Determinants of enhancer and promoter activities of regulatory elements

   Nature Reviews. Genetics 21:71–87.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-019-0173-8

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Badis G
   2. Berger MF
   3. Philippakis AA
   4. Talukder S
   5. Gehrke AR
   6. Jaeger SA
   7. Chan ET
   8. Metzler G
   9. Vedenko A
   10. Chen X
   11. Kuznetsov H
   12. Wang CF
   13. Coburn D
   14. Newburger DE
   15. Morris Q
   16. Hughes TR
   17. Bulyk ML

   (2009) Diversity and complexity in DNA recognition by transcription factors

   Science (New York, N.Y.) 324:1720–1723.

   https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1162327

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Bebee TW
   2. Park JW
   3. Sheridan KI
   4. Warzecha CC
   5. Cieply BW
   6. Rohacek AM
   7. Xing Y
   8. Carstens RP

   (2015) The splicing regulators Esrp1 and Esrp2 direct an epithelial splicing program essential for mammalian development

   eLife 4:e08954.

   https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08954

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Bosher JM
   2. Totty NF
   3. Hsuan JJ
   4. Williams T
   5. Hurst HC

   (1996)

   A family of AP-2 proteins regulates c-erbB-2 expression in mammary carcinoma

   Oncogene 13:1701–1707.

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Bray NL
   2. Pimentel H
   3. Melsted P
   4. Pachter L

   (2016) Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification

   Nature Biotechnology 34:525–527.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3519

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Brewer S
   2. Feng W
   3. Huang J
   4. Sullivan S
   5. Williams T

   (2004) Wnt1-Cre-mediated deletion of AP-2alpha causes multiple neural crest-related defects

   Developmental Biology 267:135–152.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2003.10.039

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Buenrostro JD
    2. Giresi PG
    3. Zaba LC
    4. Chang HY
    5. Greenleaf WJ

    (2013) Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome position

    Nature Methods 10:1213–1218.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2688

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Buenrostro JD
    2. Wu B
    3. Chang HY
    4. Greenleaf WJ

    (2015) ATAC-seq: A Method for Assaying Chromatin Accessibility Genome-Wide

    Current Protocols in Molecular Biology 109:21.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142727.mb2129s109

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Carroll TJ
    2. Park JS
    3. Hayashi S
    4. Majumdar A
    5. McMahon AP

    (2005) Wnt9b plays a central role in the regulation of mesenchymal to epithelial transitions underlying organogenesis of the mammalian urogenital system

    Developmental Cell 9:283–292.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2005.05.016

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Celli J
    2. Duijf P
    3. Hamel BC
    4. Bamshad M
    5. Kramer B
    6. Smits AP
    7. Newbury-Ecob R
    8. Hennekam RC
    9. Van Buggenhout G
    10. van Haeringen A
    11. Woods CG
    12. van Essen AJ
    13. de Waal R
    14. Vriend G
    15. Haber DA
    16. Yang A
    17. McKeon F
    18. Brunner HG
    19. van Bokhoven H

    (1999) Heterozygous germline mutations in the p53 homolog p63 are the cause of EEC syndrome

    Cell 99:143–153.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81646-3

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Chai Y
    2. Maxson RE

    (2006) Recent advances in craniofacial morphogenesis

    Developmental Dynamics 235:2353–2375.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.20833

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Chen EY
    2. Tan CM
    3. Kou Y
    4. Duan Q
    5. Wang Z
    6. Meirelles GV
    7. Clark NR
    8. Ma’ayan A

    (2013) Enrichr: interactive and collaborative HTML5 gene list enrichment analysis tool

    BMC Bioinformatics 14:128.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-14-128

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Chiquet BT
    2. Blanton SH
    3. Burt A
    4. Ma D
    5. Stal S
    6. Mulliken JB
    7. Hecht JT

    (2008) Variation in WNT genes is associated with non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate

    Human Molecular Genetics 17:2212–2218.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddn121

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Corces MR
    2. Trevino AE
    3. Hamilton EG
    4. Greenside PG
    5. Sinnott-Armstrong NA
    6. Vesuna S
    7. Satpathy AT
    8. Rubin AJ
    9. Montine KS
    10. Wu B
    11. Kathiria A
    12. Cho SW
    13. Mumbach MR
    14. Carter AC
    15. Kasowski M
    16. Orloff LA
    17. Risca VI
    18. Kundaje A
    19. Khavari PA
    20. Montine TJ
    21. Greenleaf WJ
    22. Chang HY

    (2017) An improved ATAC-seq protocol reduces background and enables interrogation of frozen tissues

    Nature Methods 14:959–962.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4396

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Davies AF
    2. Stephens RJ
    3. Olavesen MG
    4. Heather L
    5. Dixon MJ
    6. Magee A
    7. Flinter F
    8. Ragoussis J

    (1995) Evidence of a locus for orofacial clefting on human chromosome 6p24 and STS content map of the region

    Human Molecular Genetics 4:121–128.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/4.1.121

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Davies SJ
    2. Wise C
    3. Venkatesh B
    4. Mirza G
    5. Jefferson A
    6. Volpi EV
    7. Ragoussis J

    (2004) Mapping of three translocation breakpoints associated with orofacial clefting within 6p24 and identification of new transcripts within the region

    Cytogenetic and Genome Research 105:47–53.

    https://doi.org/10.1159/000078008

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Davis CA
    2. Hitz BC
    3. Sloan CA
    4. Chan ET
    5. Davidson JM
    6. Gabdank I
    7. Hilton JA
    8. Jain K
    9. Baymuradov UK
    10. Narayanan AK
    11. Onate KC
    12. Graham K
    13. Miyasato SR
    14. Dreszer TR
    15. Strattan JS
    16. Jolanki O
    17. Tanaka FY
    18. Cherry JM

    (2018) The Encyclopedia of DNA elements (ENCODE): data portal update

    Nucleic Acids Research 46:D794–D801.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx1081

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Dixon MJ
    2. Marazita ML
    3. Beaty TH
    4. Murray JC

    (2011) Cleft lip and palate: understanding genetic and environmental influences

    Nature Reviews. Genetics 12:167–178.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2933

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Dixon JR
    2. Selvaraj S
    3. Yue F
    4. Kim A
    5. Li Y
    6. Shen Y
    7. Hu M
    8. Liu JS
    9. Ren B

    (2012) Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions

    Nature 485:376–380.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11082

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Dussault AA
    2. Pouliot M

    (2006) Rapid and simple comparison of messenger RNA levels using real-time PCR

    Biological Procedures Online 8:1–10.

    https://doi.org/10.1251/bpo114

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Eckert D
    2. Buhl S
    3. Weber S
    4. Jäger R
    5. Schorle H

    (2005) The AP-2 family of transcription factors

    Genome Biology 6:246.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2005-6-13-246

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
25. 1. ENCODE Project Consortium

    (2012) An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome

    Nature 489:57–74.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11247

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Erickson PA
    2. Baek J
    3. Hart JC
    4. Cleves PA
    5. Miller CT

    (2018) Genetic Dissection of a Supergene Implicates Tfap2a in Craniofacial Evolution of Threespine Sticklebacks

    Genetics 209:591–605.

    https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.118.300760

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Fan X
    2. Wang D
    3. Burgmaier JE
    4. Teng Y
    5. Romano RA
    6. Sinha S
    7. Yi R

    (2018) Single Cell and Open Chromatin Analysis Reveals Molecular Origin of Epidermal Cells of the Skin

    Developmental Cell 47:21–37.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2018.08.010

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Feng W
    2. Simoes-de-Souza F
    3. Finger TE
    4. Restrepo D
    5. Williams T

    (2009) Disorganized olfactory bulb lamination in mice deficient for transcription factor AP-2epsilon

    Molecular and Cellular Neurosciences 42:161–171.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcn.2009.06.010

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Ferretti E
    2. Li B
    3. Zewdu R
    4. Wells V
    5. Hebert JM
    6. Karner C
    7. Anderson MJ
    8. Williams T
    9. Dixon J
    10. Dixon MJ
    11. Depew MJ
    12. Selleri L

    (2011) A conserved Pbx-Wnt-p63-Irf6 regulatory module controls face morphogenesis by promoting epithelial apoptosis

    Developmental Cell 21:627–641.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2011.08.005

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Gaspar JM

    (2018) NGmerge: merging paired-end reads via novel empirically-derived models of sequencing errors

    BMC Bioinformatics 19:e2.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2579-2

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
31. Software

    1. Gaspar JM

    (2022) Genrich: detecting sites of genomic enrichment, version v0.5

    GitHub.

    https://github.com/jsh58/Genrich
32. 1. Goodnough LH
    2. Dinuoscio GJ
    3. Ferguson JW
    4. Williams T
    5. Lang RA
    6. Atit RP

    (2014) Distinct requirements for cranial ectoderm and mesenchyme-derived wnts in specification and differentiation of osteoblast and dermal progenitors

    PLOS Genetics 10:1004152.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004152

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Guttormsen J
    2. Koster MI
    3. Stevens JR
    4. Roop DR
    5. Williams T
    6. Winger QA

    (2008) Disruption of epidermal specific gene expression and delayed skin development in AP-2 gamma mutant mice

    Developmental Biology 317:187–195.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.02.017

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
34. 1. He F
    2. Hu X
    3. Xiong W
    4. Li L
    5. Lin L
    6. Shen B
    7. Yang L
    8. Gu S
    9. Zhang Y
    10. Chen Y

    (2014) Directed Bmp4 expression in neural crest cells generates a genetic model for the rare human bony syngnathia birth defect

    Developmental Biology 391:170–181.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.04.013

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Heinz S
    2. Benner C
    3. Spann N
    4. Bertolino E
    5. Lin YC
    6. Laslo P
    7. Cheng JX
    8. Murre C
    9. Singh H
    10. Glass CK

    (2010) Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities

    Molecular Cell 38:576–589.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.05.004

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Hesse K
    2. Vaupel K
    3. Kurt S
    4. Buettner R
    5. Kirfel J
    6. Moser M

    (2011) AP-2δ is a crucial transcriptional regulator of the posterior midbrain

    PLOS ONE 6:23483.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023483

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Hicks EA
    2. Zaveri M
    3. Deschamps PA
    4. Noseworthy MD
    5. Ball A
    6. Williams T
    7. West-Mays JA

    (2018) Conditional Deletion of AP-2α and AP-2β in the Developing Murine Retina Leads to Altered Amacrine Cell Mosaics and Disrupted Visual Function

    Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 59:2229–2239.

    https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.17-23283

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Hoffman TL
    2. Javier AL
    3. Campeau SA
    4. Knight RD
    5. Schilling TF

    (2007) Tfap2 transcription factors in zebrafish neural crest development and ectodermal evolution

    Journal of Experimental Zoology. Part B, Molecular and Developmental Evolution 308:679–691.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.21189

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Hong SJ
    2. Lardaro T
    3. Oh MS
    4. Huh Y
    5. Ding Y
    6. Kang UJ
    7. Kirfel J
    8. Buettner R
    9. Kim K-S

    (2008) Regulation of the noradrenaline neurotransmitter phenotype by the transcription factor AP-2beta

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 283:16860–16867.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M709106200

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Hooper JE
    2. Jones KL
    3. Smith FJ
    4. Williams T
    5. Li H

    (2020) An alternative splicing program for mouse craniofacial development

    Frontiers in Physiology 11:1099.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.01099

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Hu D
    2. Marcucio RS
    3. Helms JA

    (2003) A zone of frontonasal ectoderm regulates patterning and growth in the face

    Development (Cambridge, England) 130:1749–1758.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.00397

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Hu D
    2. Marcucio RS

    (2009) Unique organization of the frontonasal ectodermal zone in birds and mammals

    Developmental Biology 325:200–210.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.10.026

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
43. 1. Imai KS
    2. Hikawa H
    3. Kobayashi K
    4. Satou Y

    (2017) Tfap2 and Sox1/2/3 cooperatively specify ectodermal fates in ascidian embryos

    Development (Cambridge, England) 144:33–37.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.142109

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Inman KE
    2. Purcell P
    3. Kume T
    4. Trainor PA

    (2013) Interaction between Foxc1 and Fgf8 during mammalian jaw patterning and in the pathogenesis of syngnathia

    PLOS Genetics 9:e1003949.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003949

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Jeong J
    2. Li X
    3. McEvilly RJ
    4. Rosenfeld MG
    5. Lufkin T
    6. Rubenstein JLR

    (2008) Dlx genes pattern mammalian jaw primordium by regulating both lower jaw-specific and upper jaw-specific genetic programs

    Development (Cambridge, England) 135:2905–2916.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.019778

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Jiang R
    2. Lan Y
    3. Chapman HD
    4. Shawber C
    5. Norton CR
    6. Serreze DV
    7. Weinmaster G
    8. Gridley T

    (1998) Defects in limb, craniofacial, and thymic development in Jagged2 mutant mice

    Genes & Development 12:1046–1057.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.12.7.1046

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Jin YR
    2. Han XH
    3. Taketo MM
    4. Yoon JK

    (2012) Wnt9b-dependent FGF signaling is crucial for outgrowth of the nasal and maxillary processes during upper jaw and lip development

    Development (Cambridge, England) 139:1821–1830.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.075796

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Juriloff DM
    2. Harris MJ
    3. Dewell SL
    4. Brown CJ
    5. Mager DL
    6. Gagnier L
    7. Mah DG

    (2005) Investigations of the genomic region that contains the clf1 mutation, a causal gene in multifactorial cleft lip and palate in mice

    Birth Defects Research. Part A, Clinical and Molecular Teratology 73:103–113.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/bdra.20106

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Juriloff DM
    2. Harris MJ
    3. McMahon AP
    4. Carroll TJ
    5. Lidral AC

    (2006) Wnt9b is the mutated gene involved in multifactorial nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate in A/WySn mice, as confirmed by A genetic complementation test

    Birth Defects Research. Part A, Clinical and Molecular Teratology 76:574–579.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/bdra.20302

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
50. 1. Knight RD
    2. Javidan Y
    3. Zhang T
    4. Nelson S
    5. Schilling TF

    (2005) AP2-dependent signals from the ectoderm regulate craniofacial development in the zebrafish embryo

    Development (Cambridge, England) 132:3127–3138.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.01879

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Kondo S
    2. Schutte BC
    3. Richardson RJ
    4. Bjork BC
    5. Knight AS
    6. Watanabe Y
    7. Howard E
    8. de Lima RLLF
    9. Daack-Hirsch S
    10. Sander A
    11. McDonald-McGinn DM
    12. Zackai EH
    13. Lammer EJ
    14. Aylsworth AS
    15. Ardinger HH
    16. Lidral AC
    17. Pober BR
    18. Moreno L
    19. Arcos-Burgos M
    20. Valencia C
    21. Houdayer C
    22. Bahuau M
    23. Moretti-Ferreira D
    24. Richieri-Costa A
    25. Dixon MJ
    26. Murray JC

    (2002) Mutations in IRF6 cause Van der Woude and popliteal pterygium syndromes

    Nature Genetics 32:285–289.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ng985

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Kuleshov MV
    2. Jones MR
    3. Rouillard AD
    4. Fernandez NF
    5. Duan Q
    6. Wang Z
    7. Koplev S
    8. Jenkins SL
    9. Jagodnik KM
    10. Lachmann A
    11. McDermott MG
    12. Monteiro CD
    13. Gundersen GW
    14. Ma’ayan A

    (2016) Enrichr: a comprehensive gene set enrichment analysis web server 2016 update

    Nucleic Acids Research 44:W90–W97.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw377

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
53. 1. Langmead B
    2. Trapnell C
    3. Pop M
    4. Salzberg SL

    (2009) Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome

    Genome Biology 10:r25.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
54. 1. Le Douarin NM
    2. Creuzet S
    3. Couly G
    4. Dupin E

    (2004) Neural crest cell plasticity and its limits

    Development (Cambridge, England) 131:4637–4650.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.01350

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
55. 1. Leach SM
    2. Feng W
    3. Williams T

    (2017) Gene expression profile data for mouse facial development

    Data in Brief 13:242–247.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2017.05.003

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
56. 1. Lee S
    2. Kong Y
    3. Weatherbee SD

    (2013) Forward genetics identifies Kdf1/1810019J16Rik as an essential regulator of the proliferation-differentiation decision in epidermal progenitor cells

    Developmental Biology 383:201–213.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2013.09.022

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
57. 1. Lee S
    2. Sears MJ
    3. Zhang Z
    4. Li H
    5. Salhab I
    6. Krebs P
    7. Xing Y
    8. Nah HD
    9. Williams T
    10. Carstens RP

    (2020) Cleft lip and cleft palate in Esrp1 knockout mice is associated with alterations in epithelial-mesenchymal crosstalk

    Development (Cambridge, England) 147:369.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.187369

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
58. 1. Leslie EJ
    2. Liu H
    3. Carlson JC
    4. Shaffer JR
    5. Feingold E
    6. Wehby G
    7. Laurie CA
    8. Jain D
    9. Laurie CC
    10. Doheny KF
    11. McHenry T
    12. Resick J
    13. Sanchez C
    14. Jacobs J
    15. Emanuele B
    16. Vieira AR
    17. Neiswanger K
    18. Standley J
    19. Czeizel AE
    20. Deleyiannis F
    21. Christensen K
    22. Munger RG
    23. Lie RT
    24. Wilcox A
    25. Romitti PA
    26. Field LL
    27. Padilla CD
    28. Cutiongco-de la Paz EMC
    29. Lidral AC
    30. Valencia-Ramirez LC
    31. Lopez-Palacio AM
    32. Valencia DR
    33. Arcos-Burgos M
    34. Castilla EE
    35. Mereb JC
    36. Poletta FA
    37. Orioli IM
    38. Carvalho FM
    39. Hecht JT
    40. Blanton SH
    41. Buxó CJ
    42. Butali A
    43. Mossey PA
    44. Adeyemo WL
    45. James O
    46. Braimah RO
    47. Aregbesola BS
    48. Eshete MA
    49. Deribew M
    50. Koruyucu M
    51. Seymen F
    52. Ma L
    53. de Salamanca JE
    54. Weinberg SM
    55. Moreno L
    56. Cornell RA
    57. Murray JC
    58. Marazita ML

    (2016) A Genome-wide Association Study of Nonsyndromic Cleft Palate Identifies an Etiologic Missense Variant in GRHL3

    American Journal of Human Genetics 98:744–754.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.02.014

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
59. 1. Li W
    2. Cornell RA

    (2007) Redundant activities of Tfap2a and Tfap2c are required for neural crest induction and development of other non-neural ectoderm derivatives in zebrafish embryos

    Developmental Biology 304:338–354.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.12.042

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
60. 1. Li Heng
    2. Handsaker B
    3. Wysoker A
    4. Fennell T
    5. Ruan J
    6. Homer N
    7. Marth G
    8. Abecasis G
    9. Durbin R
    10. 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup

    (2009) The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools

    Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 25:2078–2079.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
61. 1. Li H
    2. Williams T

    (2013) Separation of mouse embryonic facial ectoderm and mesenchyme

    Journal of Visualized Experiments 1:50248.

    https://doi.org/10.3791/50248

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
62. 1. Li H
    2. Jones KL
    3. Hooper JE
    4. Williams T

    (2019a) The molecular anatomy of mammalian upper lip and primary palate fusion at single cell resolution

    Development (Cambridge, England) 146:12.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.174888

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
63. 1. Li L
    2. Wang Y
    3. Torkelson JL
    4. Shankar G
    5. Pattison JM
    6. Zhen HH
    7. Fang F
    8. Duren Z
    9. Xin J
    10. Gaddam S
    11. Melo SP
    12. Piekos SN
    13. Li J
    14. Liaw EJ
    15. Chen L
    16. Li R
    17. Wernig M
    18. Wong WH
    19. Chang HY
    20. Oro AE

    (2019b) TFAP2C- and p63-Dependent Networks Sequentially Rearrange Chromatin Landscapes to Drive Human Epidermal Lineage Commitment

    Cell Stem Cell 24:271–284.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2018.12.012

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
64. 1. Liu Z
    2. Li C
    3. Xu J
    4. Lan Y
    5. Liu H
    6. Li X
    7. Maire P
    8. Wang X
    9. Jiang R

    (2019) Crucial and Overlapping Roles of Six1 and Six2 in Craniofacial Development

    Journal of Dental Research 98:572–579.

    https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034519835204

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
65. 1. Lustig B
    2. Jerchow B
    3. Sachs M
    4. Weiler S
    5. Pietsch T
    6. Karsten U
    7. van de Wetering M
    8. Clevers H
    9. Schlag PM
    10. Birchmeier W
    11. Behrens J

    (2002) Negative feedback loop of Wnt signaling through upregulation of conductin/axin2 in colorectal and liver tumors

    Molecular and Cellular Biology 22:1184–1193.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.22.4.1184-1193.2002

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
66. 1. Martino VB
    2. Sabljic T
    3. Deschamps P
    4. Green RM
    5. Akula M
    6. Peacock E
    7. Ball A
    8. Williams T
    9. West-Mays JA

    (2016) Conditional deletion of AP-2β in mouse cranial neural crest results in anterior segment dysgenesis and early-onset glaucoma

    Disease Models & Mechanisms 9:849–861.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.025262

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
67. 1. McLean CY
    2. Bristor D
    3. Hiller M
    4. Clarke SL
    5. Schaar BT
    6. Lowe CB
    7. Wenger AM
    8. Bejerano G

    (2010) GREAT improves functional interpretation of cis-regulatory regions

    Nature Biotechnology 28:495–501.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1630

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
68. 1. Menezes R
    2. Letra A
    3. Kim AH
    4. Küchler EC
    5. Day A
    6. Tannure PN
    7. Gomes da Motta L
    8. Paiva KBS
    9. Granjeiro JM
    10. Vieira AR

    (2010) Studies with Wnt genes and nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate

    Birth Defects Research. Part A, Clinical and Molecular Teratology 88:995–1000.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/bdra.20720

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
69. 1. Meulemans D
    2. Bronner-Fraser M

    (2002) Amphioxus and lamprey AP-2 genes: implications for neural crest evolution and migration patterns

    Development (Cambridge, England) 129:4953–4962.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.129.21.4953

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
70. 1. Meulemans D
    2. Bronner-Fraser M

    (2004) Gene-regulatory interactions in neural crest evolution and development

    Developmental Cell 7:291–299.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2004.08.007

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
71. 1. Milunsky JM
    2. Maher TA
    3. Zhao G
    4. Roberts AE
    5. Stalker HJ
    6. Zori RT
    7. Burch MN
    8. Clemens M
    9. Mulliken JB
    10. Smith R
    11. Lin AE

    (2008) TFAP2A mutations result in branchio-oculo-facial syndrome

    American Journal of Human Genetics 82:1171–1177.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.03.005

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
72. 1. Minoux M
    2. Rijli FM

    (2010) Molecular mechanisms of cranial neural crest cell migration and patterning in craniofacial development

    Development (Cambridge, England) 137:2605–2621.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.040048

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
73. 1. Minoux M
    2. Holwerda S
    3. Vitobello A
    4. Kitazawa T
    5. Kohler H
    6. Stadler MB
    7. Rijli FM

    (2017) Gene bivalency at Polycomb domains regulates cranial neural crest positional identity

    Science (New York, N.Y.) 355:2913.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal2913

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
74. 1. Mitchell JM
    2. Sucharov J
    3. Pulvino AT
    4. Brooks EP
    5. Gillen AE
    6. Nichols JT

    (2021) The alx3 gene shapes the zebrafish neurocranium by regulating frontonasal neural crest cell differentiation timing

    Development (Cambridge, England) 148:197483.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.197483

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
75. 1. Moser M
    2. Pscherer A
    3. Roth C
    4. Becker J
    5. Mücher G
    6. Zerres K
    7. Dixkens C
    8. Weis J
    9. Guay-Woodford L
    10. Buettner R
    11. Fässler R

    (1997) Enhanced apoptotic cell death of renal epithelial cells in mice lacking transcription factor AP-2beta

    Genes & Development 11:1938–1948.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.11.15.1938

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
76. 1. Muzumdar MD
    2. Tasic B
    3. Miyamichi K
    4. Li L
    5. Luo L

    (2007) A global double-fluorescent Cre reporter mouse

    Genesis (New York, N.Y) 45:593–605.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/dvg.20335

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
77. 1. Nyberg DA
    2. Hegge FN
    3. Kramer D
    4. Mahony BS
    5. Kropp RJ

    (1993) Premaxillary protrusion: a sonographic clue to bilateral cleft lip and palate

    Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 12:331–335.

    https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.1993.12.6.331

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
78. 1. Ong CT
    2. Corces VG

    (2014) CTCF: an architectural protein bridging genome topology and function

    Nature Reviews. Genetics 15:234–246.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3663

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
79. 1. Pertea M
    2. Kim D
    3. Pertea GM
    4. Leek JT
    5. Salzberg SL

    (2016) Transcript-level expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with HISAT, StringTie and Ballgown

    Nature Protocols 11:1650–1667.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2016.095

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
80. 1. Peyrard-Janvid M
    2. Leslie EJ
    3. Kousa YA
    4. Smith TL
    5. Dunnwald M
    6. Magnusson M
    7. Lentz BA
    8. Unneberg P
    9. Fransson I
    10. Koillinen HK
    11. Rautio J
    12. Pegelow M
    13. Karsten A
    14. Basel-Vanagaite L
    15. Gordon W
    16. Andersen B
    17. Svensson T
    18. Murray JC
    19. Cornell RA
    20. Kere J
    21. Schutte BC

    (2014) Dominant mutations in GRHL3 cause Van der Woude Syndrome and disrupt oral periderm development

    American Journal of Human Genetics 94:23–32.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.11.009

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
81. 1. Pimentel H
    2. Bray NL
    3. Puente S
    4. Melsted P
    5. Pachter L

    (2017) Differential analysis of RNA-seq incorporating quantification uncertainty

    Nature Methods 14:687–690.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4324

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
82. 1. Pontoriero GF
    2. Deschamps P
    3. Ashery-Padan R
    4. Wong R
    5. Yang Y
    6. Zavadil J
    7. Cvekl A
    8. Sullivan S
    9. Williams T
    10. West-Mays JA

    (2008) Cell autonomous roles for AP-2alpha in lens vesicle separation and maintenance of the lens epithelial cell phenotype

    Developmental Dynamics 237:602–617.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.21445

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
83. 1. Prescott SL
    2. Srinivasan R
    3. Marchetto MC
    4. Grishina I
    5. Narvaiza I
    6. Selleri L
    7. Gage FH
    8. Swigut T
    9. Wysocka J

    (2015) Enhancer divergence and cis-regulatory evolution in the human and chimp neural crest

    Cell 163:68–83.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.036

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
84. 1. Rahimov F
    2. Marazita ML
    3. Visel A
    4. Cooper ME
    5. Hitchler MJ
    6. Rubini M
    7. Domann FE
    8. Govil M
    9. Christensen K
    10. Bille C
    11. Melbye M
    12. Jugessur A
    13. Lie RT
    14. Wilcox AJ
    15. Fitzpatrick DR
    16. Green ED
    17. Mossey PA
    18. Little J
    19. Steegers-Theunissen RP
    20. Pennacchio LA
    21. Schutte BC
    22. Murray JC

    (2008) Disruption of an AP-2alpha binding site in an IRF6 enhancer is associated with cleft lip

    Nature Genetics 40:1341–1347.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.242

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
85. 1. Ramírez F
    2. Ryan DP
    3. Grüning B
    4. Bhardwaj V
    5. Kilpert F
    6. Richter AS
    7. Heyne S
    8. Dündar F
    9. Manke T

    (2016) deepTools2: a next generation web server for deep-sequencing data analysis

    Nucleic Acids Research 44:W160–W165.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw257

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
86. 1. Reynolds K
    2. Kumari P
    3. Sepulveda Rincon L
    4. Gu R
    5. Ji Y
    6. Kumar S
    7. Zhou CJ

    (2019) Wnt signaling in orofacial clefts: crosstalk, pathogenesis and models

    Disease Models & Mechanisms 12:37051.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.037051

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
87. 1. Richardson RJ
    2. Dixon J
    3. Malhotra S
    4. Hardman MJ
    5. Knowles L
    6. Boot-Handford RP
    7. Shore P
    8. Whitmarsh A
    9. Dixon MJ

    (2006) Irf6 is a key determinant of the keratinocyte proliferation-differentiation switch

    Nature Genetics 38:1329–1334.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1894

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
88. 1. Rothstein M
    2. Simoes-Costa M

    (2020) Heterodimerization of TFAP2 pioneer factors drives epigenomic remodeling during neural crest specification

    Genome Research 30:35–48.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.249680.119

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
89. 1. Satoda M
    2. Zhao F
    3. Diaz GA
    4. Burn J
    5. Goodship J
    6. Davidson HR
    7. Pierpont ME
    8. Gelb BD

    (2000) Mutations in TFAP2B cause Char syndrome, a familial form of patent ductus arteriosus

    Nature Genetics 25:42–46.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/75578

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
90. 1. Schmidt M
    2. Huber L
    3. Majdazari A
    4. Schütz G
    5. Williams T
    6. Rohrer H

    (2011) The transcription factors AP-2β and AP-2α are required for survival of sympathetic progenitors and differentiated sympathetic neurons

    Developmental Biology 355:89–100.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.04.011

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
91. 1. Schock EN
    2. Struve JN
    3. Chang CF
    4. Williams TJ
    5. Snedeker J
    6. Attia AC
    7. Brugmann SA

    (2017) A tissue-specific role for intraflagellar transport genes during craniofacial development

    PLOS ONE 12:174206.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174206

    • Google Scholar
92. 1. Schorle H
    2. Meier P
    3. Buchert M
    4. Jaenisch R
    5. Mitchell PJ

    (1996) Transcription factor AP-2 essential for cranial closure and craniofacial development

    Nature 381:235–238.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/381235a0

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
93. 1. Seberg HE
    2. Van Otterloo E
    3. Loftus SK
    4. Liu H
    5. Bonde G
    6. Sompallae R
    7. Cornell RA

    (2017) TFAP2 paralogs regulate melanocyte differentiation in parallel with MITF

    PLOS Genetics 13:1006636.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006636

    • Google Scholar
94. 1. Simmons O
    2. Bolanis EM
    3. Wang J
    4. Conway SJ

    (2014) In situ hybridization (both radioactive and nonradioactive) and spatiotemporal gene expression analysis

    Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.) 1194:225–244.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1215-5_12

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
95. 1. Smith AN
    2. Miller L-AD
    3. Song N
    4. Taketo MM
    5. Lang RA

    (2005) The duality of beta-catenin function: a requirement in lens morphogenesis and signaling suppression of lens fate in periocular ectoderm

    Developmental Biology 285:477–489.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.07.019

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
96. 1. Soriano P

    (1999) Generalized lacZ expression with the ROSA26 Cre reporter strain

    Nature Genetics 21:70–71.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/5007

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
97. 1. Ting SB
    2. Caddy J
    3. Hislop N
    4. Wilanowski T
    5. Auden A
    6. Zhao L-L
    7. Ellis S
    8. Kaur P
    9. Uchida Y
    10. Holleran WM
    11. Elias PM
    12. Cunningham JM
    13. Jane SM

    (2005) A homolog of Drosophila grainy head is essential for epidermal integrity in mice

    Science (New York, N.Y.) 308:411–413.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1107511

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
98. 1. Trapnell C
    2. Roberts A
    3. Goff L
    4. Pertea G
    5. Kim D
    6. Kelley DR
    7. Pimentel H
    8. Salzberg SL
    9. Rinn JL
    10. Pachter L

    (2012) Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks

    Nature Protocols 7:562–578.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2012.016

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
99. 1. Van Otterloo E
    2. Li W
    3. Bonde G
    4. Day KM
    5. Hsu MY
    6. Cornell RA

    (2010) Differentiation of zebrafish melanophores depends on transcription factors AP2 alpha and AP2 epsilon

    PLOS Genetics 6:1001122.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001122

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
100. 1. Van Otterloo E
     2. Li W
     3. Garnett A
     4. Cattell M
     5. Medeiros DM
     6. Cornell RA

     (2012) Novel Tfap2-mediated control of soxE expression facilitated the evolutionary emergence of the neural crest

     Development (Cambridge, England) 139:720–730.

     https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.071308

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
101. 1. Van Otterloo E
     2. Feng W
     3. Jones KL
     4. Hynes NE
     5. Clouthier DE
     6. Niswander L
     7. Williams T

     (2016) MEMO1 drives cranial endochondral ossification and palatogenesis

     Developmental Biology 415:278–295.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.12.024

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
102. 1. Van Otterloo E
     2. Li H
     3. Jones KL
     4. Williams T

     (2018) AP-2α and AP-2β cooperatively orchestrate homeobox gene expression during branchial arch patterning

     Development (Cambridge, England) 145:157438.

     https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.157438

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
103. 1. Wang X
     2. Bolotin D
     3. Chu DH
     4. Polak L
     5. Williams T
     6. Fuchs E

     (2006) AP-2alpha: a regulator of EGF receptor signaling and proliferation in skin epidermis

     The Journal of Cell Biology 172:409–421.

     https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200510002

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
104. 1. Wang X
     2. Pasolli HA
     3. Williams T
     4. Fuchs E

     (2008) AP-2 factors act in concert with Notch to orchestrate terminal differentiation in skin epidermis

     The Journal of Cell Biology 183:37–48.

     https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200804030

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
105. 1. Watanabe A
     2. Akita S
     3. Tin NTD
     4. Natsume N
     5. Nakano Y
     6. Niikawa N
     7. Uchiyama T
     8. Yoshiura K

     (2006) A mutation in RYK is A genetic factor for nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate

     The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 43:310–316.

     https://doi.org/10.1597/04-145.1

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
106. 1. Williams T
     2. Tjian R

     (1991) Analysis of the DNA-binding and activation properties of the human transcription factor AP-2

     Genes & Development 5:670–682.

     https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.5.4.670

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
107. 1. Woodruff ED
     2. Gutierrez GC
     3. Van Otterloo E
     4. Williams T
     5. Cohn MJ

     (2021) Anomalous incisor morphology indicates tissue-specific roles for Tfap2a and Tfap2b in tooth development

     Developmental Biology 472:67–74.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2020.12.017

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
108. 1. Yuan Y
     2. Park J
     3. Feng A
     4. Awasthi P
     5. Wang Z
     6. Chen Q
     7. Iglesias-Bartolome R

     (2020) YAP1/TAZ-TEAD transcriptional networks maintain skin homeostasis by regulating cell proliferation and limiting KLF4 activity

     Nature Communications 11:15301.

     https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15301-0

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
109. 1. Zainolabidin N
     2. Kamath SP
     3. Thanawalla AR
     4. Chen AI

     (2017) Distinct Activities of Tfap2A and Tfap2B in the Specification of GABAergic Interneurons in the Developing Cerebellum

     Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience 10:281.

     https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2017.00281

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
110. 1. Zhang J
     2. Hagopian-Donaldson S
     3. Serbedzija G
     4. Elsemore J
     5. Plehn-Dujowich D
     6. McMahon AP
     7. Flavell RA
     8. Williams T

     (1996) Neural tube, skeletal and body wall defects in mice lacking transcription factor AP-2

     Nature 381:238–241.

     https://doi.org/10.1038/381238a0

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
111. 1. Zhao F
     2. Satoda M
     3. Licht JD
     4. Hayashizaki Y
     5. Gelb BD

     (2001) Cloning and characterization of a novel mouse AP-2 transcription factor, AP-2delta, with unique DNA binding and transactivation properties

     The Journal of Biological Chemistry 276:40755–40760.

     https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M106284200

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
112. 1. Zhao F
     2. Bosserhoff AK
     3. Buettner R
     4. Moser M

     (2011) A heart-hand syndrome gene: Tfap2b plays A critical role in the development and remodeling of mouse ductus arteriosus and limb patterning

     PLOS ONE 6:22908.

     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022908

     • Google Scholar
113. 1. Zucchero TM
     2. Cooper ME
     3. Maher BS
     4. Daack-Hirsch S
     5. Nepomuceno B
     6. Ribeiro L
     7. Caprau D
     8. Christensen K
     9. Suzuki Y
     10. Machida J
     11. Natsume N
     12. Yoshiura K-I
     13. Vieira AR
     14. Orioli IM
     15. Castilla EE
     16. Moreno L
     17. Arcos-Burgos M
     18. Lidral AC
     19. Field LL
     20. Liu Y
     21. Ray A
     22. Goldstein TH
     23. Schultz RE
     24. Shi M
     25. Johnson MK
     26. Kondo S
     27. Schutte BC
     28. Marazita ML
     29. Murray JC

     (2004) Interferon regulatory factor 6 (IRF6) gene variants and the risk of isolated cleft lip or palate

     The New England Journal of Medicine 351:769–780.

     https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa032909

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Eric Van Otterloo

   1. Iowa Institute for Oral Health Research, College of Dentistry & Dental Clinics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
   2. Department of Periodontics, College of Dentistry & Dental Clinics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
   3. Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
   4. Department of Craniofacial Biology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, United States

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing

   For correspondence

   eric-vanotterloo@uiowa.edu

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5958-5742

2. Isaac Milanda

   Department of Craniofacial Biology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, United States

   Contribution

   Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

3. Hamish Pike

   Department of Craniofacial Biology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, United States

   Contribution

   Formal analysis, Investigation

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

4. Jamie A Thompson

   1. Iowa Institute for Oral Health Research, College of Dentistry & Dental Clinics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
   2. Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States

   Contribution

   Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

5. Hong Li

   Department of Craniofacial Biology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, United States

   Contribution

   Formal analysis, Investigation

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

6. Kenneth L Jones

   Department of Pediatrics, Section of Hematology, Oncology, and Bone Marrow Transplant, University of Colorado School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, United States

   Present address

   Department of Cell Biology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, United States

   Contribution

   Formal analysis, Resources, Software

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

7. Trevor Williams

   1. Department of Craniofacial Biology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, United States
   2. Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, United States
   3. Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, United States

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing

   For correspondence

   trevor.williams@cuanschutz.edu

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2416-4603

• 2,067

  views

• 321

  downloads

• 24

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.