1. Developmental Biology
  2. Immunology and Inflammation

A functional screen of RNA binding proteins identifies genes that promote or limit the accumulation of CD138+ plasma cells

  1. David J Turner
  2. Alexander Saveliev
  3. Fiamma Salerno
  4. Louise S Matheson
  5. Michael Screen
  6. Hannah Lawson
  7. David Wotherspoon
  8. Kamil R Kranc
  9. Martin Turner  Is a corresponding author
  1. Immunology Programme, The Babraham Institute,Babraham Research Campus, United Kingdom
  2. RNA Biology Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute (NCI), United States
  3. Laboratory of Haematopoietic Stem Cell and Leukaemia Biology, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72313
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. David J Turner
  2. Alexander Saveliev
  3. Fiamma Salerno
  4. Louise S Matheson
  5. Michael Screen
  6. Hannah Lawson
  7. David Wotherspoon
  8. Kamil R Kranc
  9. Martin Turner
(2022)
A functional screen of RNA binding proteins identifies genes that promote or limit the accumulation of CD138+ plasma cells
eLife 11:e72313.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72313
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

To identify roles of RNA binding proteins (RBPs) in the differentiation or survival of antibody secreting plasma cells we performed a CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screen of 1213 mouse RBPs for their ability to affect proliferation and/or survival, and the abundance of differentiated CD138 + cells in vitro. We validated the binding partners CSDE1 and STRAP as well as the m6A binding protein YTHDF2 as promoting the accumulation of CD138 + cells in vitro. We validated the EIF3 subunits EIF3K and EIF3L and components of the CCR4-NOT complex as inhibitors of CD138 + cell accumulation in vitro. In chimeric mouse models YTHDF2-deficient plasma cells failed to accumulate.

Editor's evaluation

This paper utilizes an elegant Crispr-Cas9 screen to identify RNA binding proteins that may regulate B cell differentiation. With some additional work to verify that the identified proteins are important in vivo, the paper will be of interest to a broad audience of immunologists studying the signals regulating B cell differentiation during an immune response.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72313.sa0

Introduction

Humoral immunity requires the generation of antibody-secreting plasmablasts and plasma cells. These are derived from naive B cell precursors that enter the extrafollicular response and the germinal centre (GC) reaction (Nutt et al., 2015). Germinal centre derived antibody secreting cells may migrate to the bone marrow where they survive as long-lived plasma cells secreting high-affinity antibody.

The B- to plasma-cell transition requires substantial reprogramming of the transcriptome. This is achieved in part by the actions of transcription factors and epigenetic regulators that act within a layered system to control the timing of differentiation and its coordination with extracellular cues. Dynamic control within this system is further endowed by the integration of signal transduction pathways and post-transcriptional regulators. A central role for post-transcriptional control is mediated by microRNAs such as Mir148a (Porstner et al., 2015) and Mir155 (Lu et al., 2014) which promote and Mir125b (Gururajan et al., 2010) which suppresses plasma cell differentiation. RNA binding proteins (RBPs) act co- or post-transcriptionally to influence the quality and quantity of expressed genes. However, while estimates of the numbers of RBPs encoded in the mammalian genome vary between one to five thousand, few have been implicated in plasma cell differentiation, survival, and migration. These include, HNRNPLL which promotes differentiation indirectly by suppressing BCL6 expression (Chang et al., 2015); the non-canonical poly(A) polymerase FAM46C/TENT5C which acts as a tumour suppressor in myeloma (Bilska et al., 2020); and ZFP36L1 which is required for the emigration of plasma cells (Saveliev et al., 2021).

Motivated by a lack of known roles of RBPs in plasma cell emergence and survival, we developed a CRISPR library targeting mouse RBPs and performed genetic screens for roles in B cell proliferation and survival, and for roles in regulating the accumulation of CD138 + cells in vitro as a surrogate for authentic plasma cells. We identified 103 RBPs that promote and 189 RBPs that inhibit plasma cell abundance and validated some of these using follow up assays with independent single guide RNA (sgRNA) sequences. Using mouse models, we demonstrated that YTHDF2, an N6-methyladenosine (m6A) RNA modification binding protein, acting within B cells is necessary for the accumulation of plasma cells in the bone marrow.

Results and discussion

Genetic screening identifies RBPs regulating CD138+ cell abundance

We curated a list of 1213 mouse RBPs (excluding ribosomal subunit proteins) compiled from the compendium by Gerstberger et al and presence in at least two RNA interactome capture studies (Castello et al., 2012; Baltz et al., 2012; Beckmann et al., 2015; Gerstberger et al., 2014; Kwon et al., 2013; He et al., 2016; Liepelt et al., 2016; Supplementary file 1A). A custom sgRNA library targeting these was constructed in a vector backbone expressing puromycin resistance and CD90.1 as selection markers (Figure 1—figure supplement 1A). The library encodes 10 sgRNAs per gene, targets 72 positive control genes and contains 500 negative control sgRNAs. It contains 13,350 sgRNAs in total with >98.8% of sgRNAs normally distributed within a 16-fold range (Figure 1—figure supplement 1B; Supplementary file 1B).

To screen RBPs that regulate cell expansion (proliferation or survival), primary mouse B cells expressing Cas9 from the Rosa26 locus were cultured in vitro on fibroblasts expressing CD40ligand and BAFF for 4 days with IL-4 followed by 4 days with IL-2115. The representation of sgRNAs at day 4 and day 8 was determined by next generation sequencing (NGS) and compared (Figure 1—figure supplement 1C; Supplementary file 1C). sgRNAs targeting Trp53 and Myc enriched as expected for inhibiting and supporting cell expansion, respectively (Figure 1—figure supplement 1D, E). Rc3h1, Caprin1, and Fam46c were the only RBPs enriched for limiting B cell proliferation or survival (Figure 1—figure supplement 1D, E). FAM46C has been implicated in impairing the proliferation and/or survival of B cells (Mroczek et al., 2017; Bilska et al., 2020). Further supporting the predictive power of our dataset, we validated the role for Rc3h1 as limiting proliferation or survival with individual sgRNAs (Figure 1—figure supplement 1F).

On day 8 of the culture, we sorted cells based on the expression of CD138, a marker of differentiated plasma cells that co-express CD267, IRF4, and BLIMP1 (encoded by Prdm1) (Figure 1—figure supplement 1G), and determined the representation of sgRNAs by NGS (Figure 1—figure supplement 1C; Supplementary file 1D). To identify RBPs that regulate the accumulation of CD138 + cells, but not B cell expansion between days 4 and 8, we considered the intersection between the two screens (Figure 1A). The transcription factors: Bach2, Bcl6, Spi1, and Irf8 enriched for inhibiting CD138 + cell accumulation, and Prdm1 enriched for promoting CD138 + cell accumulation, while Irf4 was required for CD138 + cell accumulation as well as B cell expansion (Figure 1A, B). These results are consistent with the established roles (Bilska et al., 2020; Ochiai et al., 2008; Ochiai et al., 2006; Muto et al., 2010; Shaffer et al., 2000; Tunyaplin et al., 2004; Carotta et al., 2014; Shapiro-Shelef et al., 2003; Lin et al., 2002; Shaffer et al., 2002; Sciammas et al., 2006; Ochiai et al., 2013) of these genes in B cells and plasma cells, and therefore underpin our confidence that novel findings in this system reflect meaningful biological effects.

Figure 1 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
Genetic screen identifies modulators of B cell expansion and plasma cell accumulation.

(A) Dot plot representation of genetic screens of B cell proliferation/survival, and CD138 + cell accumulation: X-axis shows z-score of gene-level log2 fold change (LFC) for CD138 + cell accumulation (CD138 +v CD138- cells) and Y-axis shows z-score of gene-level LFC (day 8 v day 4 cells) for B cell expansion calculated by MAGECK. (B) Top: Distribution of enrichments of all sgRNAs (z-scores of sgRNA-level LFC: CD138 +v CD138- cells) for the CD138 + cell accumulation screen. Bottom: Enrichment for each of the ten sgRNAs, represented as red lines, targeting one of the indicated genes in comparison to the overall distribution of sgRNAs in the screen, depicted as the grey density in the middle of each bar. (C) The ratio of the proportion of cells expressing CD138 in Cas9 + cells and Cas9- cells transduced by viruses with non-targeting (NT), Prmd1, Bach2, Csde1, Strap, Eif3k, Eif3l targeting sgRNAs at day-8 of the in vitro B cell culture the data are representative of between two and four experiments performed on different days. Statistical significance was determined by two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test, p values unadjusted for multiple testing are plotted. Each symbol is representative of a distinct sgRNA. (D) Same as in (A) with additional genes highlighted. (E) Same as in (B) with additional genes highlighted. (F) Same as in (C) with Ythdf2, Mettl3, Tnrc6a, Cnot9 targeting sgRNAs and paired sgRNAs against Cnot10/Cnot11. the data are representative of between two and four experiments performed on different days. (G) Left: representative flow cytometry for Ythdf2 CTL and Ythdf2 CKO and right: summary data of the proportion of cells expressing CD138 at day 8 of an in vitro culture of B cells from Ythdf2fl/fl mice (closed circles) or Ythdf2fl/fl-Vav1-iCre mice (open squares); the data are representative of three experiments performed on different days. Statistical significance was determined by two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test. Each symbol is representative of cells from a single mouse.

We focused on the 137 RBPs that enriched for a role in regulating plasma cell accumulation that did not enrich for a role in the proliferation and/or survival of B cells (Supplementary file 1E). These enriched genes may regulate the emergence, proliferation or survival of CD138 + cells. We validated CSDE1 and STRAP which bind to each other (Hunt et al., 1999) as promoting CD138 + cell accumulation and the eIF3 octamer subunits eIF3K and eIF3L as limiting CD138 + cell accumulation (Figure 1C, Figure 1—figure supplement 1H, I). Loss-of-function mutations in eIF3K and eIF3L have previously been shown to extend Caenorhabditis elegans lifespan by enhancing resistance to endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress (Cattie et al., 2016). Hence, eIF3K and eIF3L may inhibit CD138 + cell appearance by limiting tolerance to ER stress. All three YTHDF-family members of m6A binding proteins were also enriched for increasing CD138 + cell abundance (Figure 1D) of which Ythdf2 had the most pronounced effect (Figure 1E, F; Figure 1—figure supplement 1H, I). In further support of a role of m6A in promoting CD138 + cell accumulation, the three core components of the m6A writer complex (Mettl3, Mettl14 and Wtap), had convergent enrichment close to our cutoff for significance as promoting CD138 + cell abundance (Figure 1D, F). By contrast, ZFP36, an AU-rich element binding protein, and the TNRC6 family critical for miRNA mediated repression were enriched for limiting CD138 + cell abundance (Figure 1D–F and Figure 1—figure supplement 1H, I). ZFP36 has been previously reported to limit CD138 + cell appearance in vitro (Chu et al., 2016).

The YTHDF-, ZFP36- and TNRC6-families of RBPs are all known to promote RNA decay by recruiting the CCR4-NOT complex leading to deadenylation and subsequent decay (Du et al., 2016; Fabian et al., 2013; Chen et al., 2014). Interestingly, CNOT9, and the interacting partners CNOT-10 and –11 which form a CNOT submodule were enriched for limiting CD138 + cell abundance (Figure 1D–F). We hypothesise that the CCR4-NOT complex via its interactions with different adapters may act as a post-transcriptional hub that controls survival or the decision to differentiate. In this model, we envisage the ZFP36- and TNRC6-families suppress transcripts that promote plasma cell differentiation or survival, while the YTHDF-family suppress transcripts that inhibit plasma cell differentiation or survival.

Antibody secreting cells deficient for YTHDF2 fail to accumulate

Our screen demonstrated that Ythdf2 and its paralogues promote CD138 + cell accumulation, without appreciably affecting B cell expansion. To confirm this, we took advantage of Ythdf2fl/fl;Vav1-iCre (Ythdf2 CKO) mice, in which Ythdf2 is conditionally deleted from the haematopoietic system (Paris et al., 2019; Mapperley et al., 2021). Following anti-IgM stimulation in vitro the numbers of Ythdf2 CKO B cells at each division was not different from Ythdf2fl/fl control (Ythdf2 CTL) B cells (Figure 1—figure supplement 1J). Moreover, Ythdf2 CKO B cells showed no difference in the proportions of IgG1 +and IgE + cells generated in vitro compared to Ythdf2 CTL B cells (Figure 1—figure supplement 1K), indicating that class switch recombination (CSR) did not require YTHDF2 in vitro. Because Ythdf2 CKO B cells generated fewer CD138 + cells compared to Ythdf2 CTL B cells (Figure 1G), we hypothesise that YTHDF2 promotes B cell differentiation independently of a role in CSR, cell proliferation or survival, or specifically promotes the survival of differentiated CD138 + cells.

To investigate an in vivo role of Ythdf2, we established mixed bone-marrow chimeras in B6.SJL recipients with μMT and either Ythdf2 CTL or Ythdf2 CKO bone marrow cells. In these chimeras, CD45.1+ μMT stem cells, which cannot generate B cells, ensure that non-B cells are primarily Ythdf2-sufficient, whereas all B cells derive from CD45.2 + control or experimental donors. Ythdf2-deficient cells efficiently reconstituted the splenic B cell pool (Figure 2A) enabling us to test the hapten-specific responses of mature B cells lacking YTHDF2 in two independent immunisation experiments with alum precipitated 4-Hydroxy-3-nitrophenylacetyl coupled to the carrier protein Keyhole-Limpet Hemocyanin (NP-KLH). At 21 days after immunisation the ratio of high and low valency NP-binding IgG1 in Ythdf2 CKO chimeras was comparable to controls (Figure 2B), however, a slight defect may exist that remains undetected by the power of our experiment. At day 21, the number of CD138 +CD267+ (Figure 2—figure supplement 1A) NIP +IgG1 + splenic plasmablasts (Figure 2C) and NIP +IgG1 + plasma cells in the bone marrow (Figure 2D) were both threefold lower in the Ythdf2 CKO compared to the controls. We observed no difference in CXCR4 expression in CD138 +CD267 + cells between genotypes (Figure 2—figure supplement 1B). Together these results demonstrate a role for YTHDF2 in the accumulation of plasma cells in vivo.

Figure 2 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
Analysis of µMT chimeras at day 21 after immunisation with NP-KLH in alum.

(A) Left: Representative flow cytometry analysis of cells expressing CD45.2 and CD19 in spleen of µMT chimeras 14 weeks after reconstitution. Numbers refer to the proportion of viable single cells within CD45.2 + CD19 + gate. Right: The number of cells expressing CD45.2 and CD19, n = 11. (B) Left: End point titre of serum for anti-NP20 IgG1 antibody. Center: End point titre of serum for anti-NP1.5 IgG1 antibody Right: Ratio of end point titres of serum for anti-NP1.5 and anti-NP20 IgG1 antibodies. Representative flow cytometry analysis of NIP and IgG1 intracellular staining of spleen (C) or bone marrow (D) cells expressing CD138 and CD267. The numbers in the bottom right corner of left-hand panels of C and D show the number of events plotted. The numbers adjacent to the gates indicate the proportion of NIP +IgG1 + cells. The right-hand panels of C and D show the number of cells expressing NIP and IgG1 per million viable cells as calculated from the indicated gates. Each symbol represents an individual Ythdf2fl/fl control (closed circles, n = 6) and Ythdf2fl/fl-Vav1-iCre knockout (open squares, n = 8) mouse. Statistical significance was determined by a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test. The data are pooled from two separate immunisation experiments.

As an independent experimental approach of addressing the role of YTHDF2 in plasma cell accumulation, we also generated competitive mixed bone marrow chimeras in lethally irradiated B6.SJL recipients with equal amounts of CD45.1 + B6.SJL and either CD45.2 + Ythdf2 CTL or Ythdf2 CKO bone marrow cells and performed one immunisation experiment with NP-KLH. This system allows YTHDF2-deficient B cells to be in competition with YTHDF2-sufficient B cells at all developmental stages, thus offering a stringent test for functionality of YTHDF2-deficient cells. The Ythdf2 conditional allele was engineered to express a GFP-YTHDF2 fusion protein in the absence of Cre recombinase, so that GFP expression reliably indicates cells that express YTHDF2 (Ivanova et al., 2017). Previously, Ythdf2 was reported to have a minor role in promoting B cell development (Zheng et al., 2020). In our competitive chimeras, YTHDF2-deficient cells efficiently reconstituted the mature B cell pool (Figure 3A) with >98% being GFP negative and thus having undergone Cre-mediated deletion (Figure 3—figure supplement 1A). At 21 days after immunisation, the number of NIP +IgG1 + splenic plasmablasts was fivefold lower in the Ythdf2 CKO chimeras compared to the controls (Figure 3B). Ythdf2 CKO plasma cells were depleted in the bone marrow compartment (Figure 3C) and those present were predominantly deficient for Ythdf2 (Figure 3—figure supplement 1B). Moreover, Ythdf2 CKO antigen specific IgG1 +plasma cells in the bone marrow were also fivefold less abundant in the Ythdf2 CKO chimeras compared to the controls (Figure 3D and Figure 3—figure supplement 1C). This defect was specific to the mutation of Ythdf2 as there were similar numbers of CD45.1 B6.SJL-derived plasma cells (Figure 3—figure supplement 1D) and NIP +IgG1 + plasma cells (Figure 3—figure supplement 1E) in the bone marrow of Ythdf2 CTL and Ythdf2 CKO chimeras. These data are consistent with the findings from the μMT chimeras and suggests Ythdf2 is required for the accumulation of plasma cells in vivo.

Figure 3 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
YTHDF2 deficient plasma cells fail to accumulate in the bone marrow.

(A) Left: Representative flow cytometry analysis of cells expressing CD45.2 and CD19 in spleen of competitive chimeras twelve weeks after reconstitution. Numbers refer to the proportion of viable single cells within CD45.2 + CD19 + gate. Right: The number of cells expressing CD45.2 and CD19, n ≥ 10. (B) Representative flow cytometry analysis of NIP and IgG1 intracellular staining on spleen cells gated as CD45.2 + CD138+, CD267 + cells at day 21. (C) Representative flow cytometry analysis of CD138 and CD267 staining on bone marrow cells gated as CD45.2 + at day 21. (D) Representative flow cytometry analysis of NIP and IgG1 intracellular staining on bone marrow cells gated as CD45.2 + CD138+, CD267 +at day 21. For each condition, the numbers in the bottom right corner of left-hand panels show the number of events plotted. The numbers adjacent to the gates indicate the proportion of cells within the gate. For each condition, the right-hand plots show the number of cells per million viable cells. Symbols represent data from an individual Ythdf2fl/fl control (closed circles, n = 3) and Ythdf2fl/fl-Vav1-iCre knockout (open squares, n = 6) mouse. Statistical significance was determined by two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test. The data are from a single immunisation experiment.

The spectrum of m6A modified transcripts in B cells

To further understand how the m6A modification of mRNA may impact B cell activation we performed m6A-eCLIP to identify methylated transcripts within the B cell transcriptome. In total 3370 high confidence m6A sites were identified among 2658 transcripts in wild-type B cells cultured on 40LB cells for 8 days. These m6A sites were strongly enriched for DRACH (D = G/A/U, R = G/A, H = A/U/C) and more specifically the RRACU motifs (Figure 4A). m6A sites were enriched in the terminal exon and in the location of the STOP codon in accordance with published datasets (Figure 4B; Dominissini et al., 2012; Meyer et al., 2012; Gerald et al., 2015). We hypothesised that m6A may mark B cell specific transcripts for turnover upon differentiation. To investigate this, we performed RNA-seq of wild-type B cells cultured on 40LB cells in vitro for eight days and sorted by flow cytometry based on B220hi CD138- or B220lo CD138 +expression. However, the m6A sites present in the B cell transcriptome (at the 3’UTR and/or CDS) were not characteristic of transcripts specific to either differentiation state and were not biased to transcripts of high expression levels (Figure 4C). As YTHDF paralogues are expected to bind all available m6A sites in a transcriptome we speculate that YTHDF2 binds transcripts specific to both differentiation states (Zaccara and Jaffrey, 2020). However, we cannot rule out the possibility that YTHDF2 has an m6A independent role. Among the methylated transcripts identified were Bach2, Pax5, Irf8, and Spi1 all of which encode transcription factors that inhibit B cell terminal differentiation, and Prdm1 which promotes differentiation (Figure 4D).

Figure 4
Download asset Open asset
Negative regulators of B cell differentiation are methylated.

(A) Z-scores showing enrichment of five base motifs centred at in vitro derived B cell m6A-eCLIP crosslink sites relative to randomised control sites in each replicate, n = 2. (B) Metagene analysis of the location of m6A clusters throughout the B cell transcriptome. (C) Log2 fold change for differentially expressed (FDR-adjusted p-values < 0.05) methylated (black - identified using the CLIPper pipeline) and unmethylated (grey) transcripts between CD138 +B220 lo and CD138- B220hi in vitro cultured cells, n = 3. (Left) 3´UTR methylated transcripts, (centre) CDS methylated transcripts, (right) transcripts methylated in both their 3´UTR and CDS. (D) Methylation pattern of individual transcripts encoding regulators (Bach2, Pax5, Irf8, Spi1, Prdm1) of B cell differentiation.

In summary, we have provided evidence that hundreds of RBPs regulate the accumulation of CD138 + cells. ZFP36- and TNRC6-families, as well as CNOT9 and the interacting partners CNOT10 and CNOT11 of the CCR4-NOT complex have roles in limiting the accumulation of CD138 + cells. By contrast, the CCR4-NOT binding partner YTHDF2 has an essential role in promoting the accumulation of plasma cells in the spleen and bone marrow. The mechanisms by which these RBPs limit CD138 + cell accumulation remain to be investigated. Our in vitro data support a role for YTHDF2 in promoting plasma cell accumulation via differentiation or survival, while our in vivo bone marrow data could also be explained by a role for YTHDF2 in plasma cell migration. We also observed a defect in Ythdf2 deficient plasma cell accumulation in the spleen and identified m6A methylation on transcripts encoding transcriptional repressors and promotors of plasma cell differentiation; together these indicate that YTHDF2 mediated regulation of differentiation or migration are not sufficient to fully explain YTHDF2 support of plasma cell accumulation. One tempting hypothesis is that YTHDF2 promotes plasma cell accumulation by limiting apoptosis induced by ER stress (Einstein et al., 2021) specifically within differentiated plasma cells. Furthermore, METTL3 is required for GC formation and YTHDF2 has been previously shown to have a role in supporting the germinal centre reaction (Grenov et al., 2021), which may promote plasma cell accumulation. Determining the precise mechanism by which YTHDF2 impacts plasma cell biology requires further studies of differentiation, survival and migration.

Materials and methods

Construction of sgRNA vector backbone and mouse RBP sgRNA library

Request a detailed protocol

MSCV_hU6_BbsI-ccdB-BbsI_iScaffold_mPGK_puro-2A-CD90.1 was generated in one round of cloning from a similar plasmid previously generated in our lab (Turner and Turner, 2021) (iScaffold refers to an improved sgRNA scaffold design Dang et al., 2015). A PCR product encoding hU6_BbsI-ccdB-BbsI_iScaffold_mPGK_puro-2A-CD90.1 and the appropriate flanking sequences was generated and ligated by Gibson assembly into a XhoI +SalI linearised vector (MIGRI). Our mouse RBP sgRNA library was generated as previously described (Turner and Turner, 2021). For individual sgRNAs, two 24nt oligonucleotides were annealed and ligated by T4 ligation into our BbsI linearised MSCV backbone vector. For pairwise sgRNAs, PCR products encoding hU6_sgRNA1 and mU6_sgRNA2 with the appropriate flanking sequences were generated and ligated by Gibson assembly into a BbsI linearised RetroQ_BbsI-ccdB-BbsI_iScaffold_mPGK_CD90.1 vector. We targeted mouse RBPs identified by multiple high-throughput studies employing mRNA interactome capture (RIC) (Castello et al., 2012; Baltz et al., 2012; Beckmann et al., 2015; Gerstberger et al., 2014; Kwon et al., 2013; He et al., 2016; Liepelt et al., 2016). Our library targets RBPs identified in at least two mouse RIC studies; the mouse orthologues of RBPs identified in at least two human RIC studies; and manually curated RBPs identified in only one RIC study that had “RNA binding” gene ontology or were paralogues of a human RBP orthologue.

In vitro plasma cell differentiation

Request a detailed protocol

3T3 cells expressing mouse CD40L and human BAFF (40LB cells Nojima et al., 2011) were maintained in Roswell Park Memorial Institute 1640 (RPMI-1640) media supplemented with 10% FBS and 1 x GlutaMAX (Gibco: 35050061). Irradiated (~120Gγ) 40LB cells were seeded at 80 × 103 cells per well in a 12-well plate in supplemented RPMI-1640 media. The next day, naive B cells were isolated from the spleens of mice using the B cell isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotec: 130-090-862) and 30 × 103 cultured on the irradiated 40LB cells with IL-4 in supplemented RPMI-1640 media (final: 10% FBS, 1 x GlutaMAX, 50 µM 2-mercaptoethanol Thermo Scientific: 31350–010, 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin Thermo Scientific: 15140, 10 ng/ml mIL-4 PeproTech 214–14). On day 4 B cells were reseeded on freshly irradiated 40LB cells with IL-21 in supplemented RPMI-1640 media (final: 10% FBS, 1 x GlutaMAX, 50 µM 2-mercaptoethanol, 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin, 10 ng/ml mIL-21 PeproTech 210–21). On day 8, B cells were harvested and analysed. 40LB cells were a kind gift from Prof D. Kitamura, they were negative for mycoplasma contamination, and authenticated for CD40L expression by flow cytometry.

Retrovirus production and transduction

Request a detailed protocol

The Plat-E retrovirus packaging cell line was maintained in supplemented Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s (DMEM) high glucose media (Gibco: 41965) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Plat-E cells in logarithmic growth phase were seeded in dishes (Nunc 150350). The next day, a transfection mix of 1000 μl OptiMEM (Gibco: 31985), 30 μl TransIT–293 (Mirus Bio: MIR2700), 9 µg transfer vector, 2 µg packaging pCL-ECO vector was added dropwise and incubated with the cells overnight. The media was replaced. Then, for 2 sequential days the viral supernatant was harvested. B cells cultured on 40LBs for 3 days were transduced with retrovirus particles encoding sgRNAs in the presence of 4 ng/ml polybrene (Sigma-Aldrich: H9268), by spin-fection at 1000 g for 45 min at 32 °C.

CRISPR/Cas9 genetic screen of B cell differentiation, proliferation, and survival

Request a detailed protocol

B cells were cultured with 40LB, on day 3 cells were transduced with the mouse RBP sgRNA library at an MOI of 0.1 with a predetermined amount of retrovirus supernatant. On day 4, transduced cells were positively selected by magnetic assisted cell sorting (MACS) via the cell surface antigen CD90.1 (Thy1.1) using microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec: 130-094-523); the manufacturer’s protocol was adjusted by using 4 x less reagents and by maintaining cells at room temperature. On day 8, CD138- and CD138 +B cells were physically separated by fluorescence activated cell sorting, washed in PBS, and snap frozen on dry ice in a 15 ml conical tube before storage at –80 °C for future analysis of CD138 + cell accumulation. In addition, on day 4 and day 8, bulk B cells, unselected for transduction or CD138 expression, were processed and stored in a comparable fashion for future analysis of B cell proliferation/survival. Enough cells to ensure a representation of >1000 x transduced cells per sgRNA in the library were maintained at all timepoints and in all populations.

Next generation sequencing library generation for CRISPR screen

Request a detailed protocol

Genomic DNA (gDNA) was isolated as previously described (Chen et al., 2015). Next generation sequencing (NGS) libraries were generated as previously described (Joung et al., 2017). Multiplexed NGS libraries were sequenced with an Illumina HiSeq with a 100 bp single end read. The start of the iCRISPR scaffold sequence (GTTTAAGAGCTAT) within each read was identified, and the reads trimmed to encompass the 19 bases immediately preceding this sequence. Bowtie (Langmead et al., 2009) was used to map these sequences with zero mismatches to a custom genome comprising the sgRNA sequences, and Seqmonk used to quantify the abundance of each sgRNA (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/seqmonk/). Analysis of our genetic screens was performed with the MAGeCK software (Li et al., 2014). MAGeCK determined gene-level LFC for the proliferation/survival (day 8 cells v day 4 cells) and plasma cell abundance (CD138 + cells v CD138- cells) screens. The non-targeting negative control sgRNAs were used to build a mean-variance model for null distribution, which in turn was used to calculate significant sgRNA enrichment. Positive and negative enrichments were calculated, then independently used in robust rank aggregation to obtain gene-level scores. This process identified the extent to which each sgRNA enriched out of the distribution of negative control sgRNAs, then ranked genes by the consistency of their sgRNAs to outperform the null hypothesis (that they would not enrich outside the NT-sgRNAs). Gene-level p-values were calculated by randomizing sgRNA to target gene allocation in permutation tests; false discovery was controlled by the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure. Log2 fold changes (LFC) were calculated as the median LFC for all sgRNAs for a targeted gene that enriched in the same direction. Z-scores were calculated as the number of standard deviations from the mean of all negative control LFCs. Our statistical cutoff for gene level enrichment was set at a Z-score of greater than or equal to +/-2, and an FDR adjusted p-value of less than 0.05.

Validation of targets from CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screens

Request a detailed protocol

A mixed population of GFP-Cas9 positive and GFP-Cas9 negative B cells, at a ratio of 75:25, were cocultured and transduced with individual sgRNA vectors against genes of interest. The ratio of transduced cells that were differentiated between the Cas9 positive and Cas9 negative populations was calculated and used to control for the variation of the in vitro germinal centre B cell culture between experiments. Furthermore, the change in GFP+: GFP- ratio over the culture indicated whether genetically modified cells (Cas9+) had a competitive advantage over unperturbed cells (Cas9-).

Proliferation assay

Request a detailed protocol

Na-ve B cell were labelled with CellTrace Violet (Thermo Scientific: C34557), following the manufacturer’s protocol, then seeded at 2 × 106 cells/ml in 100 μl per well of a 96-well plate and stimulated with anti-IgM (2.5 μg/ml) (F(ab')2 fragment, polyclonal) (Jackson ImmunoResearch: 115-006-020) with IL-4 (10 ng/ml) and IL-21 (10 ng/ml) (PeproTech: 210–21). The inclusion of counting beads enabled the calculation of absolute cell numbers.

Mice

All mice were on a C57BL/6 background. R26-GFP-Cas9 Mb1-Cre mice were derived from C57BL/6Cd79atm1(cre)Reth (Hobeika et al., 2006) and C57BL/6Gt(ROSA)26Sortm1(CAG-cas9*,-EGFP)Fezh (Platt et al., 2014). For µMT bone marrow chimera experiments B6.SJL-PtprcaPepcb/Boy (B6.SJL) mice were used as recipients and reconstituted with CD45.1 µMT (Ighmtm1Cgn) (Kitamura et al., 1991) and either CD45.2 Ythdf2 CTL (Ythdf2Tg(Vav1-icre)A2Kio) or CD45.2 Ythdf2 CKO (Ythdf2tm1.1Doca + Tg(Vav1-icre)A2Kio) mice (Paris et al., 2019; Mapperley et al., 2021; Ivanova et al., 2017). For competitive bone marrow chimeras, B6.SJL-PtprcaPepcb/Boy (B6.SJL) mice were used as recipients and reconstituted with B6.SJL mice and either CD45.2 Ythdf2 CTL or CD45.2 Ythdf2 CKO mice.

Ethics Statement: All mouse experimentation was approved by the Babraham Institute Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Body and was licensed by the United Kingdom Home Office under PPL P4D4AF812. Mice were bred and maintained in the Babraham Institute Biological Support Unit. Since the opening of this barrier facility in 2009 no primary pathogens or additional agents listed in the FELASA recommendations have been confirmed during health monitoring surveys of the stock holding rooms. Ambient temperature was ~19–21 °C and relative humidity 52%. Lighting was provided on a 12 hr light: 12 hr dark cycle including 15 min 'dawn' and 'dusk' periods of subdued lighting. After weaning, mice were transferred to individually ventilated cages with 1–5 mice per cage. Mice were fed CRM (P) VP diet (Special Diet Services) ad libitum and received seeds (e.g. sunflower, millet) at the time of cage-cleaning as part of their environmental enrichment.

Generation and primary immunisation of chimeric mouse models

Request a detailed protocol

B6.SJL recipient mice were lethally irradiated with two doses of 5.0 Gy. For µMT chimeras, recipients were reconstituted with 3 × 106 total bone marrow cells composed from 80% μMT donor bone marrow cells and 20% either Ythdf2 CTL or Ythdf2 CKO donor bone marrow cells. For competitive chimeras, recipients were reconstituted with 3 × 106 total bone marrow cells composed from 50% B6SJL donor bone marrow cells and 50% either Ythdf2 CTL or Ythdf2 CKO donor bone marrow cells. Mice received intraperitoneal injection of 200 μl sterile PBS containing 100 μg of NP(23)KLH adsorbed in 40% v/v Alum (Serva: 12261). NP-KLH was emulsified in Alum by rotation for 30 min at room temperature protected from light.

ELISA

Request a detailed protocol

NP-specific antibodies were detected by ELISA as previously described (Saveliev et al., 2021); antibody end point titres were used as a measure of relative concentration.

Flow cytometry

Request a detailed protocol

Cell suspensions from spleen and bone marrow were prepared and stained as previously described (Saveliev et al., 2021). NIP and IgG1 expression in CD138 +CD267 + plasma cells was detected with intracellular staining. A list of antibodies is provided in Supplementary file 1F.

m6A-eCLIP

Request a detailed protocol

B cells were cultured in vitro and on day 8 total B cell and plasma cells were separated from 40LB cells by negative selection with H-2Kd-biotin antibody and anti-biotin microbeads (Miltenyi 130-090-485) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Total RNA was prepared with a kit (Zymo R2050) following the manufacturer’s instructions and sent to Eclipse Bioinnovations who isolated poly(A) RNA, crosslinked an m6A antibody, performed immunoprecipitation and NGS.

Data were analysed by Eclipse Bioinnovations according to their standard m6A-eCLIP analysis pipeline (https://eclipsebio.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/eclipsebio_data_analysis_review_m6A-eCLIP.pdf). Briefly: The first 10 bases of each read (which comprise a UMI) were trimmed using UMI-tools (Smith et al., 2017; Li et al., 2011), followed by trimming of poor quality and adaptor sequences from the 3' end of the reads using cutadapt. Reads mapping to repetitive elements were filtered out, and the remaining reads mapped to the mouse GRCm38 genome build using STAR. PCR duplicates were removed using UMI-tools. Clusters of reads (peaks of m6A modification) were identified using CLIPper (https://github.com/YeoLab/clipper/wiki/CLIPper-Home), and log2 fold change relative to the corresponding input sample calculated. Clusters that were reproducible between replicates were then identified using IDR (Krakau et al., 2017) (https://github.com/nboley/idr). Single nucleotide resolution crosslink sites with enrichment relative to input were also identified using PureCLIP (Ramírez et al., 2016). The gene or feature type to which each crosslink site was assigned was based on the Ensembl Mouse GRCm38.97 annotation release. If the site overlapped multiple genes or feature types, the most likely was chosen in a hierarchical way: first, protein coding isoforms were prioritised; second, transcript isoforms with support level <4 were prioritised; third by a hierarchy of feature types (CDS >3’UTR >5’UTR >intron > non-coding exon >non-coding intron); third, higher confidence isoforms (based first on transcript support level and second on whether they have a CCDS) were prioritised.

To assess enrichment of 5 base motifs at the crosslink sites, the 5 bases centred on each crosslink site for each replicate were identified, and the representation of all 5-mers quantified. This was repeated for 100 sets of control sites, where the locations of the crosslink sites were randomised across all genes that contain at least one crosslink site, ensuring the same distribution across features as in the m6A-eCLIP dataset. The z-score for each 5mer was then calculated as: (occurrence at eCLIP crosslink sites - mean occurrence at control sites) / standard deviation of occurrence at control sites.

Metagene analysis of the distribution of m6A was performed on the Galaxy server using deepTools (Kim et al., 2015). The computeCoverage tool was first used using the Ensembl Mouse GRCm38.97 GTF file, scaling all CDS annotations and additionally analysing 1 kb up- and downstream of each. A BED file containing the reproducible clusters was used as the score file, and the maximum value calculated, without skipping 0 s (therefore, this will be 1 for windows containing a cluster and 0 for those without). The resulting matrix was then used as input to plotProfile, and the average across all genes plotted.

Generation and analysis of mRNA sequencing libraries

Request a detailed protocol

For transcriptomic analysis, total RNA was isolated from 0.4 × 106 FACS-sorted B220hi CD138- and B220lo CD138 +B cells (derived from 3 biological replicates after eight days in culture) using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). cDNA was generated from polyadenylated transcripts employing the SMART-Seq v4 ultra low input RNA kit (Takara Bio). RNA and cDNA quality was analysed on a 2100 Bioanalyser (Agilent). mRNAseq libraries were prepared using Nextera XT DNA library preparation kit (Illumina) and quantified with KAPA library quantification kit (Roche). Barcoded libraries were multiplexed and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 2500-RapidRun system on a 50 bp single-end mode with a coverage of 20 M reads per sample. Reads were trimmed using Trim Galore and mapped to mouse genome GRCm38.97 using HiSat2 (2.1.0) (Love et al., 2014). Raw counts were calculated over mRNA features (excluding Ig molecules) using SeqMonk (1.47.2; https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/seqmonk/). DESeq2 (1.30.1)60 was used to calculate differential RNA abundance and performed using default parameters, with ‘normal’ log2 fold change shrinkage. p Values were adjusted for false discovery rate using the Benjamini-Hochberg method. Information on biological replicates were included in the design formula to have paired analysis. Differentially expressed transcripts were cross-referenced with transcripts that contained peaks of m6A modification identified using CLIPper.

Data availability

The sgRNA library is available upon request and from Addgene (#169082). The CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screen data and m6A-eCLIP data that support the findings of this study have been deposited in GEO with the GSE179919 accession code, and the RNA-seq data has been deposited in GEO with the GSE179281 accession code.

The following data sets were generated
    1. Turner DJ
    2. Matheson LS
    3. Turner M
    (2021) NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus
    ID GSE179919. The RNA m6A binding protein YTHDF2 promotes the B cell to plasma cell transition.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE179919
    1. Salerno F
    2. Matheson LS
    3. Turner M
    (2021) NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus
    ID GSE179281. Transcriptomic analysis of in vitro induced germinal centre-like B cells and plasmablast differentiation.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE179281

References

Decision letter

  1. Tomohiro Kurosaki
    Reviewing Editor; Osaka University, Japan
  2. Satyajit Rath
    Senior Editor; Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER), India
  3. Koji Tokoyoda
    Reviewer; Tottori University, Japan

Our editorial process produces two outputs: i) public reviews designed to be posted alongside the preprint for the benefit of readers; ii) feedback on the manuscript for the authors, including requests for revisions, shown below. We also include an acceptance summary that explains what the editors found interesting or important about the work.

Decision letter after peer review:

Thank you for submitting your article "The RNA m6A binding protein YTHDF2 promotes the B cell to plasma cell transition." for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by 3 peer reviewers, and the evaluation has been overseen by a Reviewing Editor and Satyajit Rath as the Senior Editor. The following individual involved in review of your submission has agreed to reveal their identity: Koji Tokoyoda (Reviewer #1).

The reviewers have discussed their reviews with one another, and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this to help you prepare a revised submission.

Essential revisions:

1. The discrepancy of Figure 2C and 3D is confusing. Does YTHDR2 affect the formation of germinal centre B cells? If the authors just claim that GC can be formed, to support the cytometric data, histological analyses should be performed.

2. Was the detection of NIP/IgG1 in CD138+ plasma cells performed by intracellular staining? Since most NP-specific IgG1-secreting plasma cells lose surface Igs, the detection may be underestimated. Alternatively, an ELISPOT assay can be also utilized.

3. The identification of YTHDF2-related genes in B/plasma cells should be further assessed. The protein expression of CXCR4, S1PR, integrin alpha4, etc. by flow cytometry will be supportive to Figure 4, even if it makes no difference.

4. Data presented in Figure 1C, 1F, 1G, Figure 2 and Figure 3 should be confirmed in at least 2 independent experiments performed on independent days with appropriate group sizes. The data presented here appears to be from one experimental cohort.

5. For the YTHDF2 knockout experiments did the authors also measure antibody titers to the high valency NP molecules? The data showing a small but significant drop in antibody titers to low-valency NP and if high-valency titers are normal this would suggests affinity maturation maybe affected in the absence of YTHDF2. This experiment would add support to the authors conclusion that the germinal center is not affected in the absence of YTHDF2. Additionally, ELISpot assays should be used as an additional method for enumerating NP-specific plasma cells in the spleens and bone marrow since the numbers that are counted by flow cytometry are so rare.

6.The statistical cutoffs and other metrics (i.e., z-score or fold change) used to define sgRNA enrichment should be clearly stated in the methods section, manuscript text, and/or figure legends.

7. Details and steps for how the CRISPR/Cas9 screen, RNA-seq analysis, and eCLIP data was processed were included in the reporting summary but should also be included in the appropriate section of the manuscript.

8. CD138 expression alone is not necessarily sufficient to identify plasma cells. To determine the relationship between CD138+ cells induced in their in vitro system and in vivo plasma cells, the authors should perform a principal component analysis comparing the gene expression profile obtained from their RNA-seq analysis of CD138+B220lo cells with publicly available gene expression data from plasma cells. The authors could also show the percentage of CD138+B220lo cells that express key markers of plasma cell differentiation such as Blimp1.

9. The authors used mixed bone marrow chimera approaches to determine that YTHDF2 acts in a B cell intrinsic manner. However, these results do not indicate the stage of B cell differentiation where YTHDF2 acts to regulate plasma cell differentiation. Crossing the Ythdf2f/f mice to mice expressing Cre recombinase specifically in germinal center or plasma cells, such as the Jchain Cre, could clarify this issue. Alternatively, the authors could generate chimeras where they transduce Ythdf2f/f bone marrow with a tamoxifen inducible Cre to allow them to specifically ablate Ythdf2 after B cell activation has already occurred.

10. It is also unclear whether YTHDF2 is regulating migration to the bone marrow or maintenance within the bone marrow. A kinetic assessment of the frequency of bone marrow plasma cells in cKO mice could clarify this question.

11. The authors should include the number of times each experiment was repeated, and the total number of mice used in the figure legend. Based on the reporting form it seems that some experiments were only done once with 3-4 mice in the control group. Key experiments should be repeated at least twice with 3-6 mice per group to verify the reproducibility of their results.

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):

The authors show an important role of an RNA-binding protein (RBP), YTHDF2 in the accumulation of plasma cells. In addition, by a CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screening of RBPs, the authors suggest that some RBPs are involved in plasma cell differentiation. The roles of RBPs in a lymphocyte differentiation system are very interesting, but some technical problems should be solved before publication.

1. The discrepancy of Figure 2C and 3D is confusing. Does YTHDR2 affect the formation of germinal centre B cells? If the authors just claim that GC can be formed, to support the cytometric data, histological analyses should be performed.

2. Was the detection of NIP/IgG1 in CD138+ plasma cells performed by intracellular staining? Since most NP-specific IgG1-secreting plasma cells lose surface Igs, the detection may be underestimated. Alternatively, an ELISPOT assay can be also utilized.

3. The identification of YTHDF2-related genes in B/plasma cells should be further assessed. The protein expression of CXCR4, S1PR, integrin alpha4, etc. by flow cytometry will be supportive to Figure 4, even if it makes no difference.

4. Grenov et al., (bioRxiv, 2020) show that B cell-specific METTL3-deficient mice fail to generate GC B cells and plasma cells. As METTL3 is closed to YTHDF2, the similarities and differences in the two papers should be discussed.

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):

Data presented in Figure 1C, 1F, 1G, Figure 2 and Figure 3 should be confirmed in at least 2 independent experiments performed on independent days with appropriate group sizes. The data presented here appears to be from one experimental cohort.

For the YTHDF2 knockout experiments did the authors also measure antibody titers to the high valency NP molecules? The data showing a small but significant drop in antibody titers to low-valency NP and if high-valency titers are normal this would suggests affinity maturation maybe affected in the absence of YTHDF2. This experiment would add support to the authors conclusion that the germinal center is not affected in the absence of YTHDF2. Additionally, ELISpot assays should be used as an additional method for enumerating NP-specific plasma cells in the spleens and bone marrow since the numbers that are counted by flow cytometry are so rare.

The statistical cutoffs and other metrics (i.e., z-score or fold change) used to define sgRNA enrichment should be clearly stated in the methods section, manuscript text, and/or figure legends.

Details and steps for how the CRISPR/Cas9 screen, RNA-seq analysis, and eCLIP data was processed were included in the reporting summary but should also be included in the appropriate section of the manuscript.

Multiple typos were found throughout the manuscript that should be corrected.

Reviewer #3 (Recommendations for the authors):

1) CD138 expression alone is not necessarily sufficient to identify plasma cells. To determine the relationship between CD138+ cells induced in their in vitro system and in vivo plasma cells, the authors should perform a principal component analysis comparing the gene expression profile obtained from their RNA-seq analysis of CD138+B220lo cells with publicly available gene expression data from plasma cells. The authors could also show the percentage of CD138+B220lo cells that express key markers of plasma cell differentiation such as Blimp1.

2) The authors used mixed bone marrow chimera approaches to determine that YTHDF2 acts in a B cell intrinsic manner. However, these results do not indicate the stage of B cell differentiation where YTHDF2 acts to regulate plasma cell differentiation. Crossing the Ythdf2f/f mice to mice expressing Cre recombinase specifically in germinal center or plasma cells, such as the Jchain Cre, could clarify this issue. Alternatively, the authors could generate chimeras where they transduce Ythdf2f/f bone marrow with a tamoxifen inducible Cre to allow them to specifically ablate Ythdf2 after B cell activation has already occurred.

3) It is also unclear whether YTHDF2 is regulating migration to the bone marrow or maintenance within the bone marrow. A kinetic assessment of the frequency of bone marrow plasma cells in cKO mice could clarify this question.

4) The authors should include the number of times each experiment was repeated, and the total number of mice used in the figure legend. Based on the reporting form it seems that some experiments were only done once with 3-4 mice in the control group. Key experiments should be repeated at least twice with 3-6 mice per group to verify the reproducibility of their results.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72313.sa1

Author response

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):

The authors show an important role of an RNA-binding protein (RBP), YTHDF2 in the accumulation of plasma cells. In addition, by a CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screening of RBPs, the authors suggest that some RBPs are involved in plasma cell differentiation. The roles of RBPs in a lymphocyte differentiation system are very interesting, but some technical problems should be solved before publication.

1. The discrepancy of Figure 2C and 3D is confusing. Does YTHDR2 affect the formation of germinal centre B cells? If the authors just claim that GC can be formed, to support the cytometric data, histological analyses should be performed.

The measurements shown in Figures 2C and 3D of the original manuscript are of B cells with the GC phenotype at day 21 after immunisation. At this time, when the GC reaction is waning no conclusions can be drawn about the formation or function of germinal centres. Thus we have removed these data from the revised submission.

The paper by Grenov et al., is now published, in Figure 5C of that paper it shows a two-fold reduction in the frequency of GC B cells 14 days after administration of NP-KLH. In addition, it shows YTHDF2 is not required for the Myc-dependent gene expression programme associated with the selection of high-affinity B cell clones. These published data are consistent with our finding that YTHDF2 has no detectable effect on the GC cell numbers at day 7 in competitive chimeras, and a very small effect on the GC cellularity at day 21 in mMT chimeras. We include new data (Figure 2B) which shows no major effect on affinity maturation of the antibody response at day 21 in mMT chimeras.

The data of Grenov et al., and our findings, using independent systems and measurements suggest that any defect in the GC that does exist must be rather small in magnitude. The suggested histological analysis would require generating a new set of radiation chimeras in mMT mice, which we are unable to do. Histology may distinguish if the number or size of GCs is affected by the absence of YTHDF2, but we have no reason to think this is likely to be the case. Histology, in our experience, is not more sensitive than flow cytometry at detecting small differences in GC size.

2. Was the detection of NIP/IgG1 in CD138+ plasma cells performed by intracellular staining? Since most NP-specific IgG1-secreting plasma cells lose surface Igs, the detection may be underestimated. Alternatively, an ELISPOT assay can be also utilized.

We used intracellular staining to identify NIP and IgG1 expression in CD138+ CD267+ plasma cells in all experiments. We have edited the figure legends and methods [page 17, line 21] to make this clear.

3. The identification of YTHDF2-related genes in B/plasma cells should be further assessed. The protein expression of CXCR4, S1PR, integrin alpha4, etc. by flow cytometry will be supportive to Figure 4, even if it makes no difference.

We include new data (Figure 2—figure supplement 1B) that shows no difference in CXCR4 expression in CD138+ CD267+ cells between genotypes. We did not analyse S1PR or integrin α 4 at the protein level.

4. Grenov et al., (bioRxiv, 2020) show that B cell-specific METTL3-deficient mice fail to generate GC B cells and plasma cells. As METTL3 is closed to YTHDF2, the similarities and differences in the two papers should be discussed.

We agree and have added such discussion to our manuscript [page 10 line 26].

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):

Data presented in Figure 1C, 1F, 1G, Figure 2 and Figure 3 should be confirmed in at least 2 independent experiments performed on independent days with appropriate group sizes. The data presented here appears to be from one experimental cohort.

We have edited the manuscript to clarify that the experiments in Figure 1C, 1F, 1G and Figure 2 were all conducted on at least two independent occasions (this is included in the figure legends). In each experiment, data points are individual mice which are considered biological replicates. We have only conducted the measurements made in Figure 3 (competitive chimeras) in a single experiment with the indicated number of biological replicates. We have revised the text to clarify that the µMT and competitive chimera experiments are two independent experimental approaches to address the role of YTHDF2 in plasma cell differentiation [page 8, line 21]. Given that the competitive chimeras were generated as confirmatory support of the observations made with two independent cohorts of µMT chimeras and that the results from both systems are consistent with each other further repetition will not change the conclusion that YTHDF2 is required for accumulation of bone marrow plasma cells. We have clarified this in the transparent reporting file.

For the YTHDF2 knockout experiments did the authors also measure antibody titers to the high valency NP molecules? The data showing a small but significant drop in antibody titers to low-valency NP and if high-valency titers are normal this would suggests affinity maturation maybe affected in the absence of YTHDF2. This experiment would add support to the authors conclusion that the germinal center is not affected in the absence of YTHDF2. Additionally, ELISpot assays should be used as an additional method for enumerating NP-specific plasma cells in the spleens and bone marrow since the numbers that are counted by flow cytometry are so rare.

We measured antibody titres reactive with high valency NP and observed no difference between Ythdf2 control and knockout µMT chimeras at day21 after NP-KLH immunisation. We have added new data to Figure 2B to show the ratio of high and low valency NP-binding IgG1 and conclude that the affinity maturation of the antibody response is not obviously diminished by the absence of YTHDF2 in B cells (we elaborate on this conclusion in response to reviewer 1 comment 1). Lack of correlation between antibody secreting cell numbers and serum antibody titers has been previously reported Takahashi et al., 1998; Holl et al., 2011, and has been previously observed in our group (Saveliev et al., Ref 7). Unfortunately, we do not have ELISPOT data, but our flow cytometry assays for detecting NP-binding cells as CD138+ CD267+ IRF4+ are robust and quantitative.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2212188/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3771081/

The statistical cutoffs and other metrics (i.e., z-score or fold change) used to define sgRNA enrichment should be clearly stated in the methods section, manuscript text, and/or figure legends.

We did not use a statistical cutoff for the enrichment of individual sgRNAs, instead we used a statistical cutoff for the combined enrichment of all sgRNAs targeting individual genes. The statistical cutoff for such a gene level enrichment was set at a Z-score of greater than or equal to +/- 2, and an FDR adjusted p-value of less than 0.05. We have clarified this in the revised version of the manuscript [page 15, line 16].

Details and steps for how the CRISPR/Cas9 screen, RNA-seq analysis, and eCLIP data was processed were included in the reporting summary but should also be included in the appropriate section of the manuscript.

We have revised the manuscript to include the relevant information from the reporting summary [page15].

Multiple typos were found throughout the manuscript that should be corrected.

We have carefully proofread our manuscript prior to resubmission and apologise for any typographical errors.

Reviewer #3 (Recommendations for the authors):

1) CD138 expression alone is not necessarily sufficient to identify plasma cells. To determine the relationship between CD138+ cells induced in their in vitro system and in vivo plasma cells, the authors should perform a principal component analysis comparing the gene expression profile obtained from their RNA-seq analysis of CD138+B220lo cells with publicly available gene expression data from plasma cells. The authors could also show the percentage of CD138+B220lo cells that express key markers of plasma cell differentiation such as Blimp1.

In our experience, the technical differences between RNA-seq libraries prepared at different times and in different labs contribute a substantial amount of variability to the data, making direct comparisons very difficult. Thus, we believe a principle component analysis integrating our data with published plasma cell gene expression data would likely be very difficult to interpret. We include new data (Figure 1—figure supplement 1G) that shows the CD138+B220lo cells present in our cultures are also CD267+, IRF4+ and PRDM1+. These additional markers underpin our belief that the CD138+ B220lo cells have essential features of plasma cells. Moreover, the control genes in the screen Bach2, Prdm1 and Irf4 also enrich in a manner consistent with their expected impact on the differentiation of plasma cells, further substantiating the utility of the in vitro differentiation system for such a screen.

2) The authors used mixed bone marrow chimera approaches to determine that YTHDF2 acts in a B cell intrinsic manner. However, these results do not indicate the stage of B cell differentiation where YTHDF2 acts to regulate plasma cell differentiation. Crossing the Ythdf2f/f mice to mice expressing Cre recombinase specifically in germinal center or plasma cells, such as the Jchain Cre, could clarify this issue. Alternatively, the authors could generate chimeras where they transduce Ythdf2f/f bone marrow with a tamoxifen inducible Cre to allow them to specifically ablate Ythdf2 after B cell activation has already occurred.

We have demonstrated that Ythdf2 deficiency does not impact the reconstitution of the mature B cell compartment. We have more clearly stated the limitations of our current work [page 10, line 17 and page 11 line 1] to acknowledge the uncertainty around the precise stage, or stages that Ythdf2 acts in plasma cell differentiation and survival. We have revised the title of our manuscript to reflect this important point raised by the reviewer. A detailed mechanistic study using additional Cre mouse models is not possible to perform as we have not generated these mice. It would take us an additional 2 years to complete this revision and we believe this would be beyond the scope of this brief report.

3) It is also unclear whether YTHDF2 is regulating migration to the bone marrow or maintenance within the bone marrow. A kinetic assessment of the frequency of bone marrow plasma cells in cKO mice could clarify this question.

We agree that our data do not address the possibility that YTHDF2 has a role in the migration or survival of plasma cells and have edited the manuscript to ensure that this limitation is clear [page 10, line 17]. Given that both of our chimeric models indicate a reduction in the accumulation of antibody-secreting cells in the spleen at day 21 after immunisation we believe it is reasonable to suggest that YTHDF2 does not solely impact the accumulation of plasma cells through a role in migration. In light of Einstein et al., 2021, which describes a role for YTHDF2 in limiting endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced apoptosis https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34216543/, it is appealing to hypothesise that YTHDF2 also limits apoptosis due to ER stress in plasma cells. We have discussed this possibility in the revised version of the manuscript [page 10, line 24].

4) The authors should include the number of times each experiment was repeated, and the total number of mice used in the figure legend. Based on the reporting form it seems that some experiments were only done once with 3-4 mice in the control group. Key experiments should be repeated at least twice with 3-6 mice per group to verify the reproducibility of their results.

We apologise for omitting this information and causing ambiguity. We have updated the manuscript to include this [page 8 line 9, page 8 line 24 and figure legends]. Our competitive chimera experiment consisted of only 3 control mice and was conducted once. However, as this experiment was primarily undertaken to support the findings made with multiple cohorts of µMT chimeras and gave a consistent result we do not believe repeating it will add significant value to the manuscript. Therefore, we have taken care to indicate these limitations [page 8 line 24].

Furthermore, we include new data that shows a comparison between the absolute number of antigen specific antibody secreting cells that arise from WT CD45.1+ internal controls and Ythdf2 deficient CD45.2+ cells in our competitive chimeras in N=6 mice (Figure 3—figure supplement 1C). These data enable the clear interpretation that YTHDF2-deficient plasma cells show defective accumulation in the bone marrow.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72313.sa2

Article and author information

Author details

  1. David J Turner

    1. Immunology Programme, The Babraham Institute,Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    2. RNA Biology Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Frederick, United States
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4379-6152

  2. Alexander Saveliev

    Immunology Programme, The Babraham Institute,Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  3. Fiamma Salerno

    Immunology Programme, The Babraham Institute,Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  4. Louise S Matheson

    Immunology Programme, The Babraham Institute,Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  5. Michael Screen

    Immunology Programme, The Babraham Institute,Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  6. Hannah Lawson

    Laboratory of Haematopoietic Stem Cell and Leukaemia Biology, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
    Contribution
    Resources
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  7. David Wotherspoon

    Laboratory of Haematopoietic Stem Cell and Leukaemia Biology, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
    Contribution
    Resources
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  8. Kamil R Kranc

    Laboratory of Haematopoietic Stem Cell and Leukaemia Biology, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  9. Martin Turner

    Immunology Programme, The Babraham Institute,Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review and editing
    For correspondence
    martin.turner@babraham.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3801-9896

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBS/E/B/000C0427)

  • Martin Turner

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBS/E/B/000C0428)

  • Martin Turner

Wellcome Trust (200823/Z/16/Z)

  • Martin Turner

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/L016745/1)

  • David J Turner

European Molecular Biology Organization (ALTF 880-2018)

  • Fiamma Salerno

Cancer Research UK (C29967/A26787)

  • Kamil R Kranc

European Molecular Biology Organization

  • Kamil R Kranc

Babraham Institute

  • Kamil R Kranc

Kay Kendall Leukaemia Fund

  • Kamil R Kranc

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication. For the purpose of Open Access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright license to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.

Acknowledgements

We thank the Babraham Institute Biological Support Unit, Flow Cytometry and Bioinformatics Facilities for outstanding support, and D Hodson and C Ribeiro de Almeida for helpful discussions and comments on the manuscript. This study was supported by funding from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) (BBS/E/B/000C0427; BBS/E/B/000C0428); the BBSRC Core Capability Grant to the Babraham Institute; a BBSRC-iCASE studentship BB/L016745/1 in partnership with Abzena; and a Wellcome Investigator award (200823/Z/16/Z) to MT FS was supported by European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO) Long-Term Fellowship (ALTF 880–2018). KR K’s laboratory is funded by a Cancer Research UK program grant (C29967/A26787) and project grants from the Medical Research Council, Blood Cancer UK, Barts Charity, and the Kay Kendall Leukaemia Fund. We thank the Finkelstein Lab (https://github.com/finkelsteinlab) for the BioRxiv template.

Ethics

All mouse experimentation was approved by the Babraham Institute Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Body and was licensed by the United Kingdom Home Office under PPL P4D4AF812.

Senior Editor

  1. Satyajit Rath, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER), India

Reviewing Editor

  1. Tomohiro Kurosaki, Osaka University, Japan

Reviewer

  1. Koji Tokoyoda, Tottori University, Japan

Publication history

  1. Received: July 19, 2021
  2. Preprint posted: July 21, 2021 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: April 21, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: April 22, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: May 13, 2022 (version 2)

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 2,229
    Page views
  • 304
    Downloads
  • 1
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. David J Turner
  2. Alexander Saveliev
  3. Fiamma Salerno
  4. Louise S Matheson
  5. Michael Screen
  6. Hannah Lawson
  7. David Wotherspoon
  8. Kamil R Kranc
  9. Martin Turner
(2022)
A functional screen of RNA binding proteins identifies genes that promote or limit the accumulation of CD138+ plasma cells
eLife 11:e72313.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72313

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Evolutionary Biology

    Antagonistic role of the BTB-zinc finger transcription factors Chinmo and Broad-Complex in the juvenile/pupal transition and in growth control

    Sílvia Chafino, Panagiotis Giannios ... Xavier Franch-Marro
    Research Article Updated

    During development, the growing organism transits through a series of temporally regulated morphological stages to generate the adult form. In humans, for example, development progresses from childhood through to puberty and then to adulthood, when sexual maturity is attained. Similarly, in holometabolous insects, immature juveniles transit to the adult form through an intermediate pupal stage when larval tissues are eliminated and the imaginal progenitor cells form the adult structures. The identity of the larval, pupal, and adult stages depends on the sequential expression of the transcription factors chinmo, Br-C, and E93. However, how these transcription factors determine temporal identity in developing tissues is poorly understood. Here, we report on the role of the larval specifier chinmo in larval and adult progenitor cells during fly development. Interestingly, chinmo promotes growth in larval and imaginal tissues in a Br-C-independent and -dependent manner, respectively. In addition, we found that the absence of chinmo during metamorphosis is critical for proper adult differentiation. Importantly, we also provide evidence that, in contrast to the well-known role of chinmo as a pro-oncogene, Br-C and E93 act as tumour suppressors. Finally, we reveal that the function of chinmo as a juvenile specifier is conserved in hemimetabolous insects as its homolog has a similar role in Blatella germanica. Taken together, our results suggest that the sequential expression of the transcription factors Chinmo, Br-C and E93 during larva, pupa an adult respectively, coordinate the formation of the different organs that constitute the adult organism.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine

    Cell-free DNA as a potential biomarker of differentiation and toxicity in cardiac organoids

    Brian Silver, Kevin Gerrish, Erik Tokar
    Research Article

    Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) present in the bloodstream or other bodily fluids holds potential as a non-invasive diagnostic for early disease detection. However, it remains unclear what cfDNA markers might be produced in response to specific tissue-level events. Organoid systems present a tractable and efficient method for screening cfDNA markers. However, research investigating the release of cfDNA from organoids is limited. Here, we present a scalable method for high-throughput screening of cfDNA from cardiac organoids. We demonstrate that cfDNA is recoverable from cardiac organoids, and that cfDNA release is highest early in differentiation. Intriguingly, we observed that the fraction of cell-free mitochondrial DNA appeared to decrease as the organoids developed, suggesting a possible signature of cardiac organoid maturation, or other cardiac growth-related tissue-level events. We also observe alterations in the prevalence of specific genomic regions in cardiac organoid-derived cfDNA at different timepoints during growth. In addition, we identify cfDNA markers that were increased upon addition of cardiotoxic drugs, prior to the onset of tissue demise. Together, these results indicate that cardiac organoids may be a useful system towards the identification of candidate predictive cfDNA markers of cardiac tissue development and demise.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Neuroscience

    Local angiogenic interplay of Vegfc/d and Vegfa controls brain region-specific emergence of fenestrated capillaries

    Sweta Parab, Olivia A Card ... Ryota L Matsuoka
    Research Article Updated

    Fenestrated and blood-brain barrier (BBB)-forming endothelial cells constitute major brain capillaries, and this vascular heterogeneity is crucial for region-specific neural function and brain homeostasis. How these capillary types emerge in a brain region-specific manner and subsequently establish intra-brain vascular heterogeneity remains unclear. Here, we performed a comparative analysis of vascularization across the zebrafish choroid plexuses (CPs), circumventricular organs (CVOs), and retinal choroid, and show common angiogenic mechanisms critical for fenestrated brain capillary formation. We found that zebrafish deficient for Gpr124, Reck, or Wnt7aa exhibit severely impaired BBB angiogenesis without any apparent defect in fenestrated capillary formation in the CPs, CVOs, and retinal choroid. Conversely, genetic loss of various Vegf combinations caused significant disruptions in Wnt7/Gpr124/Reck signaling-independent vascularization of these organs. The phenotypic variation and specificity revealed heterogeneous endothelial requirements for Vegfs-dependent angiogenesis during CP and CVO vascularization, identifying unexpected interplay of Vegfc/d and Vegfa in this process. Mechanistically, expression analysis and paracrine activity-deficient vegfc mutant characterization suggest that endothelial cells and non-neuronal specialized cell types present in the CPs and CVOs are major sources of Vegfs responsible for regionally restricted angiogenic interplay. Thus, brain region-specific presentations and interplay of Vegfc/d and Vegfa control emergence of fenestrated capillaries, providing insight into the mechanisms driving intra-brain vascular heterogeneity and fenestrated vessel formation in other organs.