In animals, stored fat provides a rich source of energy to sustain basal metabolic processes to survive periods of nutrient scarcity, and to support reproduction (Heier and Kühnlein, 2018; Heier et al., 2021; Walther and Farese, 2012). The main form of stored fat is triglyceride, which is deposited within specialized organelles called lipid droplets (Kühnlein, 2012; Murphy, 2001; Thiele and Spandl, 2008). Lipid droplets are found in many cell types throughout the body, but the main organ responsible for triglyceride storage is the adipose tissue (Murphy, 2001). The amount of triglyceride in the adipose tissue is regulated by many factors; however, one important factor that influences an individual’s whole-body fat level is whether the animal is female or male (Karastergiou et al., 2012; Power and Schulkin, 2008; Sieber and Spradling, 2015; Wat et al., 2020). Typically, females store more fat than males. In mammals, females store approximately 10% more body fat than males (Jackson et al., 2002; Karastergiou et al., 2012; Womersley and Durnin, 1977). Female insects, on the other hand, can store up to four times more fat than males of the same species (Lease and Wolf, 2011) and break down fat more slowly than males when nutrients are scarce (Wat et al., 2020). These male-female differences in fat metabolism play a key role in supporting successful reproduction in each sex: females with reduced fat storage often show lower fecundity (Buszczak et al., 2002; Sieber and Spradling, 2015) whereas males with excess fat storage generally show decreased fertility (Grönke et al., 2005; Wat et al., 2020). Given that fat storage also influences diverse phenotypes such as immunity and lifespan (DiAngelo and Birnbaum, 2009; Gáliková and Klepsatel, 2018; Johnson and Stolzing, 2019; Kamareddine et al., 2018; Liao et al., 2021; Roth et al., 2018; Suzawa et al., 2019), the sex-specific regulation of fat storage has implications for several life-history traits. Yet, the genetic and physiological mechanisms that link biological sex with fat storage remain incompletely understood in many animals.

Clues into potential mechanisms underlying the sex difference in fat storage have emerged from studies on the regulation of triglyceride metabolism in Drosophila. While many pathways impact whole-body triglyceride levels (Ballard et al., 2010; Bjedov et al., 2010; Broughton et al., 2005; Choi et al., 2015; DiAngelo and Birnbaum, 2009; Francis et al., 2010; Ghosh and O’Connor, 2014; Grönke et al., 2010; Heier and Kühnlein, 2018; Heier et al., 2021; Hentze et al., 2015; Kamareddine et al., 2018; Kang et al., 2017; Kubrak et al., 2020; Lee et al., 2019; Lehmann, 2018; Luong et al., 2006; Rajan and Perrimon, 2012; Roth et al., 2018; Scopelliti et al., 2019; Sieber and Spradling, 2015; Song et al., 2014; Song et al., 2017; Suzawa et al., 2019; Teleman et al., 2005; Texada et al., 2019), the Adipokinetic hormone (Akh; FBgn0004552) pathway plays a central role in regulating whole-body fat storage and breakdown (Heier and Kühnlein, 2018; Heier et al., 2021; Lehmann, 2018). Akh is synthesized as a preprohormone in the Akh-producing cells (APCs), and is subsequently cleaved by proprotein convertases to produce active Akh (Lee and Park, 2004; Noyes et al., 1995; Predel et al., 2004; Wegener et al., 2006). When the APCs are activated by stimuli such as peptide hormones or neurons that make physical connections with the APCs (Kubrak et al., 2020; Oh et al., 2019; Scopelliti et al., 2019; Zhao and Karpac, 2017), Akh is released into the hemolymph (Braco et al., 2012).

Circulating Akh then interacts with a G-protein coupled receptor called the Akh receptor (AkhR, FBgn0025595), where Akh binding to AkhR on target tissues such as the fat body increases intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) levels. High levels of cAMP activate protein kinase A (PKA; FBgg0000242) (Gäde and Auerswald, 2003; Park et al., 2002; Staubli et al., 2002), which phosphorylates several downstream metabolic effectors to promote fat breakdown. For example, in insects, active PKA promotes fat breakdown via phosphorylation and activation of Lipid storage droplet-1 (Lsd-1; FBgn0039114) (Arrese et al., 2008; Bickel et al., 2009; Gäde and Auerswald, 2003; Patel et al., 2005). In mammals, fat breakdown is mediated by similar PKA-dependent phosphorylation of Perilipin 1, the mammalian homolog of Lsd-1, and by PKA-dependent phosphorylation and recruitment of lipases, such as Hormone-sensitive lipase (Hsl), to lipid droplets to promote fat mobilization (Sztalryd and Brasaemle, 2017). Given that these genes are highly conserved between mammals and flies (Kühnlein, 2012), similar PKA-dependent mechanisms likely explain triglyceride mobilization from lipid droplets. Thus, high levels of Akh pathway activity limit fat storage whereas low levels of Akh signaling promote fat storage. While Akh-mediated triglyceride breakdown plays a vital role in releasing stored energy during times of nutrient scarcity to promote survival (Mochanová et al., 2018), the Akh pathway limits fat storage even in contexts when nutrients are plentiful. Indeed, loss of Akh or AkhR augments fat storage in males under normal physiological conditions (Bharucha et al., 2008; Gáliková et al., 2015; Grönke et al., 2007), highlighting the critical role of this pathway in regulating whole-body triglyceride levels.

Additional clues into potential mechanisms underlying the sex difference in fat storage come from studies on metabolic genes. For example, flies carrying loss-of-function mutations in genes involved in triglyceride synthesis and storage, such as midway (mdy; FBgn0004797), Lipin (Lpin; FBgn0263593), Lipid storage droplet-2 (Lsd-2; FBgn0030608), and Seipin (Seipin; FBgn0040336) show reduced whole-body triglyceride levels (Buszczak et al., 2002; Grönke et al., 2003; Teixeira et al., 2003; Tian et al., 2011; Ugrankar et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2016). Whole-body deficiency for genes that regulate triglyceride breakdown, on the other hand, generally have higher whole-body fat levels. This is best illustrated by elevated whole-body triglyceride levels found in flies lacking brummer (bmm; FBgn0036449) or Hsl (FBgn0034491), both of which encode lipases (Bi et al., 2012; Grönke et al., 2005). While these studies demonstrate the strength of Drosophila as a model in revealing conserved mechanisms that contribute to whole-body fat storage (Recazens et al., 2021; Schreiber et al., 2019; Walther and Farese, 2012), studies on Drosophila fat metabolism often use single- or mixed-sex groups of flies (Bednářová et al., 2018; Gáliková et al., 2015; Grönke et al., 2007; Hughson et al., 2021; Isabel et al., 2005; Lee and Park, 2004; Scopelliti et al., 2019). As a result, less is known about how these metabolic genes and pathways contribute to the sex difference in fat storage.

Recent studies have begun to fill this knowledge gap by studying fat metabolism in both sexes. In one study, higher circulating levels of steroid hormone ecdysone in mated females were found to promote increased whole-body fat storage (Sieber and Spradling, 2015). Another study showed that elevated levels of bmm mRNA in male flies restricted triglyceride storage to limit whole-body fat storage (Wat et al., 2020). Yet, neither ecdysone signaling nor bmm fully explain known male-female differences in whole-body fat metabolism (Sieber and Spradling, 2015; Wat et al., 2020). This suggests additional metabolic genes and pathways must contribute to sex differences in fat storage and breakdown (Wat et al., 2020). Indeed, genome-wide association studies in Drosophila demonstrate sex-biased effects on fat storage for many genetic loci (Nelson et al., 2016; Watanabe and Riddle, 2021). As evidence of sex-specific mechanisms underlying whole-body fat storage continues to mount, several reports have also identified male-female differences in phenotypes linked with fat metabolism. For example, sex differences have been reported in energy physiology, metabolic rate, food intake, food preference, circadian rhythm, sleep, immune response, starvation resistance, and lifespan (Andretic and Shaw, 2005; Austad and Fischer, 2016; Belmonte et al., 2019; Chandegra et al., 2017; Helfrich-Förster, 2000; Huber et al., 2004; Hudry et al., 2019; Millington et al., 2021; Park et al., 2018; Reddiex et al., 2013; Regan et al., 2016; Sieber and Spradling, 2015; Videlier et al., 2019; Wat et al., 2020). More work is therefore needed to understand the genetic and physiological mechanisms underlying the male-female differences in fat metabolism, and to identify the impact of this sex-specific regulation on key life-history traits. Further, it will be critical to elucidate how these mechanisms are linked with upstream factors that determine sex.

In Drosophila, sexual development is determined by the number of X chromosomes (Salz and Erickson, 2010). In females, the presence of two X chromosomes triggers the production of a functional splicing factor called Sex-lethal (Sxl; FBgn0264270) (Bell et al., 1988; Bridges, 1921; Cline, 1978). Sxl’s most well-known downstream target is transformer (tra; FBgn0003741), where Sxl-dependent splicing of tra pre-mRNA allows the production of a functional Tra protein (Belote et al., 1989; Boggs et al., 1987; Inoue et al., 1990; Sosnowski et al., 1989). In males, which have only one X chromosome, no functional Sxl or Tra proteins are made (Cline and Meyer, 1996; Salz and Erickson, 2010). Over several decades, a large body of evidence has accumulated showing that Sxl and Tra direct most aspects of female sexual identity, including effects on abdominal pigmentation, egg-laying, neural circuits, and behavior (Anand et al., 2001; Baker et al., 2001; Billeter et al., 2006; Brown and King, 1961; Burtis and Baker, 1989; Camara et al., 2008; Christiansen et al., 2002; Cline, 1978; Cline and Meyer, 1996; Clough et al., 2014; Dauwalder, 2011; Demir and Dickson, 2005; Goodwin et al., 2000; Hall, 1994; Heinrichs et al., 1998; Hoshijima et al., 1991; Inoue et al., 1992; Ito et al., 1996; Nagoshi et al., 1988; Neville et al., 2014; Nojima et al., 2014; Pavlou et al., 2016; von Philipsborn et al., 2014; Pomatto et al., 2017; Rezával et al., 2014; Rezával et al., 2016; Rideout et al., 2007; Rideout et al., 2010; Ryner et al., 1996; Sturtevant, 1945). More recently, studies have extended our knowledge of how Sxl and Tra regulate additional aspects of development and physiology such as body size and intestinal stem cell proliferation (Ahmed et al., 2020; Hudry et al., 2016; Millington and Rideout, 2018; Millington et al., 2021; Regan et al., 2016; Rideout et al., 2015; Sawala and Gould, 2017). Yet, the effects of sex determination genes on whole-body fat metabolism remain unknown, indicating a need for more knowledge of how factors that determine sexual identity influence this important aspect of physiology.

Here, we reveal a role for sex determination gene tra in regulating whole-body triglyceride storage. In females, Tra expression promotes a higher level of whole-body fat storage, whereas lack of a functional Tra protein in males leads to lower fat storage. Interestingly, neurons were the anatomical focus of tra’s effects on fat storage, where we show that ectopic Tra expression in male APCs was sufficient to augment whole-body triglyceride levels. Our analysis of Akh pathway regulation in both sexes revealed increased Akh/AkhR mRNA levels, APC activity, and Akh pathway activity in males. Our findings indicate that this overall male bias in the Akh pathway contributes to the sex difference in whole-body triglyceride levels by restricting fat storage in males. Importantly, we show that the presence of Tra influences Akh pathway activity, and that Akh lies genetically downstream of Tra in regulating whole-body fat storage. These results provide new insight into the mechanisms by which upstream determinants of sexual identity, such as tra, influence the sex difference in fat storage. Further, we identify a previously unrecognized sex-biased role for Akh in regulating whole-body triglyceride levels.

In this study, we used the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster to improve the knowledge of the mechanisms underlying the male-female difference in whole-body triglyceride levels. We show that the presence of a functional Tra protein in females, which directs many aspects of female sexual development, promotes whole-body fat storage. Tra’s ability to promote fat storage arises largely due to its function in neurons, where we identified the APCs as one neuronal population in which Tra function influences whole-body triglyceride levels. Our examination of Akh/AkhR mRNA levels and APC activity revealed several differences between the sexes, where these differences lead to higher Akh pathway activity in males than in females (Figure 7A and C). Genetic manipulation of APCs and Akh pathway activity suggest a model in which the sex bias in Akh pathway activity contributes to the male-female difference in fat storage by limiting whole-body triglyceride storage in males (Figure 7C). Importantly, we show that Tra function influences Akh pathway activity, and that Akh acts genetically downstream of Tra in regulating whole-body triglyceride levels (Figure 7B). This reveals a previously unrecognized genetic and physiological mechanism that contributes to the sex difference in fat storage.

Figure 7

Download asset Open asset

One key finding from our study was the identification of sex determination gene tra as an upstream regulator of the male-female difference in fat storage. In females, a functional Tra protein promotes fat storage, whereas lack of Tra in males leads to reduced fat storage. While an extensive body of literature has demonstrated important roles for tra in regulating neural circuits, behavior, abdominal pigmentation, and gonad development (Anand et al., 2001; Baker et al., 2001; Billeter et al., 2006; Brown and King, 1961; Burtis and Baker, 1989; Camara et al., 2008; Christiansen et al., 2002; Clough et al., 2014; Dauwalder, 2011; Demir and Dickson, 2005; Goodwin et al., 2000; Hall, 1994; Heinrichs et al., 1998; Hoshijima et al., 1991; Inoue et al., 1992; Ito et al., 1996; Nagoshi et al., 1988; Neville et al., 2014; Nojima et al., 2014; Pavlou et al., 2016; von Philipsborn et al., 2014; Pomatto et al., 2017; Rezával et al., 2014; Rezával et al., 2016; Rideout et al., 2007; Rideout et al., 2010; Ryner et al., 1996; Sturtevant, 1945), uncovering a role for tra in regulating fat storage significantly extends our understanding of how sex differences in metabolism arise. Given that sex differences exist in other aspects of metabolism (e.g., oxygen consumption) (Wat et al., 2020), this new insight suggests that more work will be needed to determine whether tra contributes to sexual dimorphism in additional metabolic traits. Indeed, one study showed that tra influences the sex difference in adaptation to hydrogen peroxide stress (Pomatto et al., 2017). Beyond metabolism, Tra also regulates multiple aspects of development and physiology such as intestinal stem cell proliferation (Ahmed et al., 2020; Hudry et al., 2016; Millington and Rideout, 2018), carbohydrate metabolism (Hudry et al., 2019), body size (Mathews et al., 2017; Rideout et al., 2015), phenotypic plasticity (Millington et al., 2021), and lifespan responses to dietary restriction (Regan et al., 2016). Because some, but not all, of these studies identify a cell type in which Tra function influences these diverse phenotypes, future studies will need to determine which cell types and tissues require Tra expression to establish a female metabolic and physiological state. Indeed, recent single-cell analyses reveal widespread gene expression differences in shared cell types between the sexes (Li et al., 2021).

Identifying neurons as the anatomical focus of Tra’s effects on fat storage was another key finding from our study. While many sexually dimorphic neural circuits related to behavior and reproduction have been identified (Anand et al., 2001; Auer and Benton, 2016; Baker et al., 2001; Billeter et al., 2006; Clyne and Miesenböck, 2008; Dauwalder, 2011; Demir and Dickson, 2005; Evans and Cline, 2007; Goodwin et al., 2000; Hall, 1994; Inoue et al., 1992; Ito et al., 1996; Kimura et al., 2019; Kvitsiani and Dickson, 2006; Neville et al., 2014; Nojima et al., 2014; Pavlou et al., 2016; von Philipsborn et al., 2014; Rezával et al., 2014; Rezával et al., 2016; Rideout et al., 2007; Rideout et al., 2010; Ryner et al., 1996; Sato et al., 2019; Shirangi et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2020), less is known about sex differences in neurons that regulate physiology and metabolism. Indeed, while many studies have identified neurons that regulate fat metabolism (Al-Anzi and Zinn, 2018; Al-Anzi et al., 2009; Chung et al., 2017; Li et al., 2016; May et al., 2020; Min et al., 2016; Mosher et al., 2015; Zhan et al., 2016), these studies were conducted in single- or mixed-sex populations. Because male-female differences in neuron number (Billeter et al., 2006; Castellanos et al., 2013; Demir and Dickson, 2005; Garner et al., 2017; Lee and Hall, 2001; Rideout et al., 2007; Rideout et al., 2010; Robinett et al., 2010; Taylor and Truman, 1992), morphology (Cachero et al., 2010; Kimura et al., 2019), activity (Guo et al., 2016), and connectivity (Cachero et al., 2010; Nojima et al., 2021) have all been described across the brain and ventral nerve cord (Mellert et al., 2010; Mellert et al., 2016), a detailed analysis of neuronal populations that influence metabolism will be needed in both sexes to understand how neurons contribute to the sex-specific regulation of metabolism and physiology. Indeed, while our identification of a role for APC sexual identity in regulating the male-female difference in fat storage represents a significant step forward in understanding how sex differences in neurons influence metabolic traits, more knowledge is needed of how Tra regulates sexual dimorphism in this critical neuronal subset. For example, while we show that females normally have lower Akh mRNA levels and APC activity, it remains unclear how the presence of Tra regulates these distinct traits. Tra may regulate Akh mRNA levels via known target genes fruitless (fru; FBgn0004652) and doublesex (dsx; FBgn0000504) (Burtis and Baker, 1989; Heinrichs et al., 1998; Hoshijima et al., 1991; Inoue et al., 1992; Nagoshi et al., 1988; Ryner et al., 1996), or alternatively through a fru- and dsx-independent pathway (Hudry et al., 2016; Rideout et al., 2015). To influence the sex difference in APC activity and Akh release, Tra may regulate factors such as ATP-sensitive potassium (K_ATP) channels and 5′ adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK)-dependent signaling, both of which are known to modulate APC activity (Braco et al., 2012; Kim and Rulifson, 2004). Future studies will therefore need to investigate Tra-dependent changes to K_ATP channel expression and function in APCs, and characterize Tra’s effects on ATP levels and AMPK signaling within APCs.

Additional ways to learn more about the sex-specific regulation of fat storage by the APCs will include examining how sexual identity influences physical connections between the APCs and other neurons, and monitoring APC responses to circulating hormones. For example, there are physical connections between corazonin- and neuropeptide F (NPF; FBgn0027109)-positive (CN) neurons and APCs in adult male flies (Oh et al., 2019), and between the APCs and a bursicon-α-responsive subset of DLgr2 neurons in females (Scopelliti et al., 2019). These connections inhibit APC activity: CN neurons inhibit APC activity in response to high hemolymph sugar levels (Oh et al., 2019), whereas binding of bursicon-α to DLgr2 neurons inhibits APC activity in nutrient-rich conditions (Scopelliti et al., 2019). Future studies will therefore need to determine whether these physical connections exist in both sexes. Further, it will be important to identify male-female differences in circulating factors that regulate the APCs. While gut-derived Allatostatin C (AstC; FBgn0032336) was recently shown to bind its receptor on the APCs to trigger Akh release, loss of AstC affects fat metabolism and starvation resistance only in females (Kubrak et al., 2020). This suggests sex differences in AstC-dependent regulation of fat metabolism may exist.

Given that gut-derived NPF binds to its receptor on the APCs to inhibit Akh release (Yoshinari et al., 2021),that skeletal muscle-derived unpaired 2 (upd2; FBgn0030904) regulates hemolymph Akh levels (Zhao and Karpac, 2017), and that circulating peptides such as Allatostatin A (AstA; FBgn0015591), Drosophila insulin-like peptides (Dilps), and activin ligands influence Akh pathway activity (Ahmad et al., 2020; Hentze et al., 2015; Post et al., 2019; Song et al., 2017), it is clear that a systematic survey of circulating factors that modulate Akh production, release, and Akh pathway activity in each sex will be needed to fully understand the sex-specific regulation of fat storage. Another important point to address in future studies will be confirming results from previous studies that the fat body is the main anatomical focus of Akh-dependent regulation of fat storage (Bharucha et al., 2008; Grönke et al., 2007). Given that the sex-biased effects of triglyceride lipase bmm arise from a male-female difference in the cell type-specific requirements for bmm function (Wat et al., 2020), it will be important to determine which cell types mediate Akh’s effects on fat storage in each sex. This line of enquiry will also clarify the underlying processes that support increased fat storage in females. At present, it remains unclear whether the higher whole-body fat storage in females is caused by lower fat breakdown (Wat et al., 2020), increased lipogenesis, or both. Given that Akh pathway activity plays a role in regulating both lipolysis and lipogenesis in Drosophila and other insects (Grönke et al., 2007; Lee and Goldsworthy, 1995; Lorenz, 2003), it will be important to identify the cellular mechanism underlying Akh’s effects on the sex difference in fat storage.

Beyond fat metabolism, it will be important to extend our understanding of how sex-specific Akh regulation affects additional Akh-regulated phenotypes. Given that we and others show Akh affects fertility and fecundity (Liao et al., 2021), future studies will need to determine whether these phenotypes are due to Akh-dependent regulation of fat metabolism, or due to direct effects of Akh on gonads. Similarly, while Akh has been linked with the regulation of lifespan (Bednářová et al., 2018; Liao et al., 2021), carbohydrate metabolism (Kim and Rulifson, 2004; Lee and Park, 2004), starvation resistance (Isabel et al., 2005; Kubrak et al., 2020; Mochanová et al., 2018), locomotion (Isabel et al., 2005; Lee and Park, 2004), immune responses (Adamo et al., 2008), cardiac function (Isabel et al., 2005; Noyes et al., 1995), and oxidative stress responses (Gáliková et al., 2015), most studies were performed in mixed- or single-sex populations. Additional work is therefore needed to determine how changes to Akh pathway function affect physiology, carbohydrate levels, development, and life history in each sex. Importantly, the lessons we learn may also extend to other species. Akh signalling is highly conserved across invertebrates (Gäde and Auerswald, 2003; Lorenz and Gäde, 2009; Staubli et al., 2002), and is functionally similar to the mammalian β-adrenergic and glucagon systems (Grönke et al., 2007; Lee and Park, 2004; Staubli et al., 2002). Because sex-specific regulation of both glucagon and the β-adrenergic systems have been described in mammalian models and in humans (Al-Gburi et al., 2017; Bell et al., 2001; Bilginoglu et al., 2007; Brooks et al., 2015; Claustre et al., 1980; Dart et al., 2002; Davis et al., 2000; Drake et al., 1998; Freedman et al., 1987; Hinojosa-Laborde et al., 1999; Hoeker et al., 2014; Hogarth et al., 2007; Lafontan et al., 1997; Luzier et al., 1998; McIntosh et al., 2011; Ng et al., 1993), detailed studies on sex-specific Akh regulation and function in flies may provide vital clues into the mechanisms underlying male-female differences in physiology and metabolism in other animals.

Details of all statistical tests and p-values are in Supplementary file 1. All raw data generated in this study are in Supplementary file 2. All primer sequences are in Supplementary file 3. Fly food media recipe is in Supplementary file 4. Original image files for all images in this study are in their respective Source Data files.

1. 1. Adamo SA
   2. Roberts JL
   3. Easy RH
   4. Ross NW

   (2008) Competition between immune function and lipid transport for the protein apolipophorin III leads to stress-induced immunosuppression in crickets

   The Journal of Experimental Biology 211:531–538.

   https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.013136

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Ahmad M
   2. He L
   3. Perrimon N

   (2020) Regulation of insulin and adipokinetic hormone/glucagon production in flies

   Developmental Biology 9:e360.

   https://doi.org/10.1002/wdev.360

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Ahmed SMH
   2. Maldera JA
   3. Krunic D
   4. Paiva-Silva GO
   5. Pénalva C
   6. Teleman AA
   7. Edgar BA

   (2020) Fitness trade-offs incurred by ovary-to-gut steroid signalling in Drosophila

   Nature 584:415–419.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2462-y

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Al-Anzi B
   2. Sapin V
   3. Waters C
   4. Zinn K
   5. Wyman RJ
   6. Benzer S

   (2009) Obesity-blocking neurons in Drosophila

   Neuron 63:329–341.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2009.07.021

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Al-Anzi B
   2. Zinn K

   (2018) Identification and characterization of mushroom body neurons that regulate fat storage in Drosophila

   Neural Development 13:18.

   https://doi.org/10.1186/s13064-018-0116-7

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Al-Gburi S
   2. Deussen A
   3. Zatschler B
   4. Weber S
   5. Künzel S
   6. El-Armouche A
   7. Lorenz K
   8. Cybularz M
   9. Morawietz H
   10. Kopaliani I

   (2017) Sex-difference in expression and function of beta-adrenoceptors in macrovessels: role of the endothelium

   Basic Research in Cardiology 112:29.

   https://doi.org/10.1007/s00395-017-0617-2

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Alfa RW
   2. Park S
   3. Skelly K-R
   4. Poffenberger G
   5. Jain N
   6. Gu X
   7. Kockel L
   8. Wang J
   9. Liu Y
   10. Powers AC
   11. Kim SK

   (2015) Suppression of insulin production and secretion by a decretin hormone

   Cell Metabolism 21:323–334.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2015.01.006

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Anand A
   2. Villella A
   3. Ryner LC
   4. Carlo T
   5. Goodwin SF
   6. Song HJ
   7. Gailey DA
   8. Morales A
   9. Hall JC
   10. Baker BS
   11. Taylor BJ

   (2001) Molecular genetic dissection of the sex-specific and vital functions of the Drosophila melanogaster sex determination gene fruitless

   Genetics 158:1569–1595.

   https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/158.4.1569

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
9. Book

   1. Andretic R
   2. Shaw PJ

   (2005)

   Essentials of Sleep Recordings in Drosophila: Moving Beyond Sleep Time

   In: Young MW, editors. Methods in Enzymology. Academic Press. pp. 759–772.

   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Arrese EL
    2. Rivera L
    3. Hamada M
    4. Mirza S
    5. Hartson SD
    6. Weintraub S
    7. Soulages JL

    (2008) FUNCTION AND STRUCTURE OF LIPID STORAGE DROPLET PROTEIN 1 STUDIED IN LIPOPROTEIN COMPLEXES

    Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 473:42–47.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2008.02.036

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Auer TO
    2. Benton R

    (2016) Sexual circuitry in Drosophila

    Current Opinion in Neurobiology 38:18–26.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2016.01.004

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Austad SN
    2. Fischer KE

    (2016) Sex Differences in Lifespan

    Cell Metabolism 23:1022–1033.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2016.05.019

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Baines RA
    2. Uhler JP
    3. Thompson A
    4. Sweeney ST
    5. Bate M

    (2001)

    Altered electrical properties in Drosophila neurons developing without synaptic transmission

    The Journal of Neuroscience 21:1523–1531.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Baker BS
    2. Taylor BJ
    3. Hall JC

    (2001) Are complex behaviors specified by dedicated regulatory genes? Reasoning from Drosophila

    Cell 105:13–24.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00293-8

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Ballard SL
    2. Jarolimova J
    3. Wharton KA

    (2010) Gbb/BMP signaling is required to maintain energy homeostasis in Drosophila

    Developmental Biology 337:375–385.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.11.011

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Baumbach J
    2. Xu Y
    3. Hehlert P
    4. Kühnlein RP

    (2014) Gαq, Gγ1 and Plc21C Control Drosophila Body Fat Storage

    Journal of Genetics and Genomics = Yi Chuan Xue Bao 41:283–292.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgg.2014.03.005

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Bednářová A
    2. Tomčala A
    3. Mochanová M
    4. Kodrík D
    5. Krishnan N

    (2018) Disruption of Adipokinetic Hormone Mediated Energy Homeostasis Has Subtle Effects on Physiology, Behavior and Lipid Status During Aging in Drosophila

    Frontiers in Physiology 9:949.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.00949

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Bell LR
    2. Maine EM
    3. Schedl P
    4. Cline TW

    (1988) Sex-lethal, a Drosophila sex determination switch gene, exhibits sex-specific RNA splicing and sequence similarity to RNA binding proteins

    Cell 55:1037–1046.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(88)90248-6

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Bell C
    2. Seals DR
    3. Monroe MB
    4. Day DS
    5. Shapiro LF
    6. Johnson DG
    7. Jones PP

    (2001) Tonic sympathetic support of metabolic rate is attenuated with age, sedentary lifestyle, and female sex in healthy adults

    The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 86:4440–4444.

    https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.86.9.7855

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Beller M
    2. Bulankina AV
    3. Hsiao HH
    4. Urlaub H
    5. Jäckle H
    6. Kühnlein RP

    (2010) PERILIPIN-dependent control of lipid droplet structure and fat storage in Drosophila

    Cell Metabolism 12:521–532.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2010.10.001

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Belmonte RL
    2. Corbally MK
    3. Duneau DF
    4. Regan JC

    (2019) Sexual Dimorphisms in Innate Immunity and Responses to Infection in Drosophila melanogaster

    Frontiers in Immunology 10:3075.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.03075

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Belote JM
    2. McKeown M
    3. Boggs RT
    4. Ohkawa R
    5. Sosnowski BA

    (1989) Molecular genetics of transformer, a genetic switch controlling sexual differentiation in Drosophila

    Developmental Genetics 10:143–154.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/dvg.1020100304

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Bharucha KN
    2. Tarr P
    3. Zipursky SL

    (2008) A glucagon-like endocrine pathway in Drosophila modulates both lipid and carbohydrate homeostasis

    The Journal of Experimental Biology 211:3103–3110.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.016451

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Bi J
    2. Xiang Y
    3. Chen H
    4. Liu Z
    5. Grönke S
    6. Kühnlein RP
    7. Huang X

    (2012) Opposite and redundant roles of the two Drosophila perilipins in lipid mobilization

    Journal of Cell Science 125:3568–3577.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.101329

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Bickel PE
    2. Tansey JT
    3. Welte MA

    (2009) PAT proteins, an ancient family of lipid droplet proteins that regulate cellular lipid stores

    Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1791:419–440.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2009.04.002

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Bilginoglu A
    2. Cicek FA
    3. Ugur M
    4. Gurdal H
    5. Turan B

    (2007) The role of gender differences in beta-adrenergic receptor responsiveness of diabetic rat heart

    Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry 305:63–69.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11010-007-9528-0

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Billeter JC
    2. Rideout EJ
    3. Dornan AJ
    4. Goodwin SF

    (2006) Control of male sexual behavior in Drosophila by the sex determination pathway

    Current Biology 16:766–776.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.08.025

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Bjedov I
    2. Toivonen JM
    3. Kerr F
    4. Slack C
    5. Jacobson J
    6. Foley A
    7. Partridge L

    (2010) Mechanisms of life span extension by rapamycin in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster

    Cell Metabolism 11:35–46.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2009.11.010

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Boggs RT
    2. Gregor P
    3. Idriss S
    4. Belote JM
    5. McKeown M

    (1987) Regulation of sexual differentiation in D. melanogaster via alternative splicing of RNA from the transformer gene

    Cell 50:739–747.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(87)90332-1

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Braco JT
    2. Gillespie EL
    3. Alberto GE
    4. Brenman JE
    5. Johnson EC

    (2012) Energy-dependent modulation of glucagon-like signaling in Drosophila via the AMP-activated protein kinase

    Genetics 192:457–466.

    https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.112.143610

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Bridges CB

    (1921) Triploid intersexes in Drosophila melanogaster

    Science 54:252–254.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.54.1394.252

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Brooks VL
    2. Shi Z
    3. Holwerda SW
    4. Fadel PJ

    (2015) Obesity-induced increases in sympathetic nerve activity: sex matters

    Autonomic Neuroscience 187:18–26.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autneu.2014.11.006

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Broughton SJ
    2. Piper MDW
    3. Ikeya T
    4. Bass TM
    5. Jacobson J
    6. Driege Y
    7. Martinez P
    8. Hafen E
    9. Withers DJ
    10. Leevers SJ
    11. Partridge L

    (2005) Longer lifespan, altered metabolism, and stress resistance in Drosophila from ablation of cells making insulin-like ligands

    PNAS 102:3105–3110.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0405775102

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Brown EH
    2. King RC

    (1961) Studies on the Expression of the Transformer Gene of Drosophila melanogaster

    Genetics 46:143–156.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/46.2.143

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Burtis KC
    2. Baker BS

    (1989) Drosophila doublesex gene controls somatic sexual differentiation by producing alternatively spliced mRNAs encoding related sex-specific polypeptides

    Cell 56:997–1010.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(89)90633-8

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Buszczak M
    2. Lu X
    3. Segraves WA
    4. Chang TY
    5. Cooley L

    (2002) Mutations in the midway gene disrupt a Drosophila acyl coenzyme A: diacylglycerol acyltransferase

    Genetics 160:1511–1518.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/160.4.1511

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Cachero S
    2. Ostrovsky AD
    3. Yu JY
    4. Dickson BJ
    5. Jefferis GSXE

    (2010) Sexual dimorphism in the fly brain

    Current Biology 20:1589–1601.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.07.045

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Camara N
    2. Whitworth C
    3. Van Doren M

    (2008) The creation of sexual dimorphism in the Drosophila soma

    Current Topics in Developmental Biology 83:65–107.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0070-2153(08)00403-1

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Castellanos MC
    2. Tang JCY
    3. Allan DW

    (2013) Female-biased dimorphism underlies a female-specific role for post-embryonic Ilp7 neurons in Drosophila fertility

    Development 140:3915–3926.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.094714

    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Chandegra B
    2. Tang JLY
    3. Chi H
    4. Alic N

    (2017) Sexually dimorphic effects of dietary sugar on lifespan, feeding and starvation resistance in Drosophila

    Aging 9:2521–2528.

    https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.101335

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Chapman T
    2. Liddle LF
    3. Kalb JM
    4. Wolfner MF
    5. Partridge L

    (1995) Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products

    Nature 373:241–244.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/373241a0

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Choi S
    2. Lim DS
    3. Chung J

    (2015) Feeding and Fasting Signals Converge on the LKB1-SIK3 Pathway to Regulate Lipid Metabolism in Drosophila

    PLOS Genetics 11:e1005263.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005263

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
43. 1. Christiansen AE
    2. Keisman EL
    3. Ahmad SM
    4. Baker BS

    (2002) Sex comes in from the cold: the integration of sex and pattern

    Trends in Genetics 18:510–516.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9525(02)02769-5

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Chung BY
    2. Ro J
    3. Hutter SA
    4. Miller KM
    5. Guduguntla LS
    6. Kondo S
    7. Pletcher SD

    (2017) Drosophila Neuropeptide F Signaling Independently Regulates Feeding and Sleep-Wake Behavior

    Cell Reports 19:2441–2450.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2017.05.085

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Claustre J
    2. Peyrin L
    3. Fitoussi R
    4. Mornex R

    (1980) Sex differences in the adrenergic response to hypoglycemic stress in human

    Psychopharmacology 67:147–153.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00431970

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Cline TW

    (1978) Two closely linked mutations in Drosophila melanogaster that are lethal to opposite sexes and interact with daughterless

    Genetics 90:683–698.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/90.4.683

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Cline TW
    2. Meyer BJ

    (1996) Vive la différence: males vs females in flies vs worms

    Annual Review of Genetics 30:637–702.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.30.1.637

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Clough E
    2. Jimenez E
    3. Kim Y-A
    4. Whitworth C
    5. Neville MC
    6. Hempel LU
    7. Pavlou HJ
    8. Chen Z-X
    9. Sturgill D
    10. Dale RK
    11. Smith HE
    12. Przytycka TM
    13. Goodwin SF
    14. Van Doren M
    15. Oliver B

    (2014) Sex- and tissue-specific functions of Drosophila doublesex transcription factor target genes

    Developmental Cell 31:761–773.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2014.11.021

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Clyne JD
    2. Miesenböck G

    (2008) Sex-specific control and tuning of the pattern generator for courtship song in Drosophila

    Cell 133:354–363.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.050

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
50. 1. Dart AM
    2. Du XJ
    3. Kingwell BA

    (2002) Gender, sex hormones and autonomic nervous control of the cardiovascular system

    Cardiovascular Research 53:678–687.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/s0008-6363(01)00508-9

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Dauwalder B

    (2011) The roles of fruitless and doublesex in the control of male courtship

    Ternational Review of Neurobiology 99:87–105.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387003-2.00004-5

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Davis SN
    2. Shavers C
    3. Costa F

    (2000) Differential gender responses to hypoglycemia are due to alterations in CNS drive and not glycemic thresholds

    American Journal of Physiology. Endocrinology and Metabolism 279:1054–1063.

    https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.2000.279.5.E1054

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
53. 1. Demir E
    2. Dickson BJ

    (2005) fruitless splicing specifies male courtship behavior in Drosophila

    Cell 121:785–794.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.04.027

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
54. 1. DiAngelo JR
    2. Birnbaum MJ

    (2009) Regulation of fat cell mass by insulin in Drosophila melanogaster

    Molecular and Cellular Biology 29:6341–6352.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00675-09

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
55. 1. Drake K
    2. Gateva E
    3. Deutsch J
    4. Cohen WR

    (1998) Sex differences in the adrenal catecholamine response to hypoglycemia in rats

    Metabolism 47:121–124.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/s0026-0495(98)90205-0

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
56. 1. Evans DS
    2. Cline TW

    (2007) Drosophila melanogaster Male Somatic Cells Feminized Solely by TraF Can Collaborate With Female Germ Cells to Make Functional Eggs

    Genetics 175:631–642.

    https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.106.066332

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
57. 1. Ferveur JF
    2. Störtkuhl KF
    3. Stocker RF
    4. Greenspan RJ

    (1995) Genetic feminization of brain structures and changed sexual orientation in male Drosophila

    Science 267:902–905.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7846534

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
58. 1. Flatt T

    (2011) Survival costs of reproduction in Drosophila

    Experimental Gerontology 46:369–375.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2010.10.008

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
59. 1. Fowler K
    2. Partridge L

    (1989) A cost of mating in female fruitflies

    Nature 338:760–761.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/338760a0

    • Google Scholar
60. 1. Francis VA
    2. Zorzano A
    3. Teleman AA

    (2010) dDOR is an EcR coactivator that forms a feed-forward loop connecting insulin and ecdysone signaling

    Current Biology 20:1799–1808.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.08.055

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
61. 1. Freedman RR
    2. Sabharwal SC
    3. Desai N

    (1987) Sex differences in peripheral vascular adrenergic receptors

    Circulation Research 61:581–585.

    https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.61.4.581

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
62. 1. Gäde G
    2. Auerswald L

    (2003) Mode of action of neuropeptides from the adipokinetic hormone family

    General and Comparative Endocrinology 132:10–20.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-6480(03)00159-x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
63. 1. Gáliková M
    2. Diesner M
    3. Klepsatel P
    4. Hehlert P
    5. Xu Y
    6. Bickmeyer I
    7. Predel R
    8. Kühnlein RP

    (2015) Energy Homeostasis Control in Drosophila Adipokinetic Hormone Mutants

    Genetics 201:665–683.

    https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.115.178897

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
64. 1. Gáliková M
    2. Klepsatel P

    (2018) Obesity and Aging in the Drosophila Model

    Ternational Journal of Molecular Sciences 19:E1896.

    https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19071896

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
65. 1. Garner SRC
    2. Castellanos MC
    3. Baillie KE
    4. Lian T
    5. Allan DW

    (2017) Drosophila female-specific Ilp7 motoneurons are generated by Fruitless-dependent cell death in males and a double-assurance survival role for Transformer in females

    Development 145:dev150821.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.150821

    • Google Scholar
66. 1. Ghosh AC
    2. O’Connor MB

    (2014) Systemic Activin signaling independently regulates sugar homeostasis, cellular metabolism, and pH balance in Drosophila melanogaster

    PNAS 111:5729–5734.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319116111

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
67. 1. Goodwin SF
    2. Taylor BJ
    3. Villella A
    4. Foss M
    5. Ryner LC
    6. Baker BS
    7. Hall JC

    (2000) Aberrant splicing and altered spatial expression patterns in fruitless mutants of Drosophila melanogaster

    Genetics 154:725–745.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/154.2.725

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
68. 1. Grönke S
    2. Beller M
    3. Fellert S
    4. Ramakrishnan H
    5. Jäckle H
    6. Kühnlein RP

    (2003) Control of Fat Storage by a Drosophila PAT Domain Protein

    Current Biology 13:603–606.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00175-1

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
69. 1. Grönke S
    2. Mildner A
    3. Fellert S
    4. Tennagels N
    5. Petry S
    6. Müller G
    7. Jäckle H
    8. Kühnlein RP

    (2005) Brummer lipase is an evolutionary conserved fat storage regulator in Drosophila

    Cell Metabolism 1:323–330.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2005.04.003

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
70. 1. Grönke S
    2. Müller G
    3. Hirsch J
    4. Fellert S
    5. Andreou A
    6. Haase T
    7. Jäckle H
    8. Kühnlein RP

    (2007) Dual lipolytic control of body fat storage and mobilization in Drosophila

    PLOS Biology 5:e137.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050137

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
71. 1. Grönke S
    2. Clarke DF
    3. Broughton S
    4. Andrews TD
    5. Partridge L

    (2010) Molecular Evolution and Functional Characterization of Drosophila Insulin-Like Peptides

    PLOS Genetics 6:e1000857.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000857

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
72. 1. Guo F
    2. Yu J
    3. Jung HJ
    4. Abruzzi KC
    5. Luo W
    6. Griffith LC
    7. Rosbash M

    (2016) Circadian neuron feedback controls the Drosophila sleep--activity profile

    Nature 536:292–297.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19097

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
73. 1. Gutierrez E
    2. Wiggins D
    3. Fielding B
    4. Gould AP

    (2007) Specialized hepatocyte-like cells regulate Drosophila lipid metabolism

    Nature 445:275–280.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05382

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
74. 1. Hall JC

    (1994) The Mating of a Fly

    Science 264:1702–1714.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.8209251

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
75. 1. Hansen M
    2. Flatt T
    3. Aguilaniu H

    (2013) Reproduction, fat metabolism, and life span: what is the connection?

    Cell Metabolism 17:10–19.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2012.12.003

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
76. 1. Heier C
    2. Kühnlein RP

    (2018) Triacylglycerol Metabolism in Drosophila melanogaster

    Genetics 210:1163–1184.

    https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.118.301583

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
77. 1. Heier C
    2. Klishch S
    3. Stilbytska O
    4. Semaniuk U
    5. Lushchak O

    (2021) The Drosophila model to interrogate triacylglycerol biology

    Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids 1866:158924.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2021.158924

    • Google Scholar
78. 1. Heinrichs V
    2. Ryner LC
    3. Baker BS

    (1998) Regulation of sex-specific selection of fruitless 5’ splice sites by transformer and transformer-2

    Molecular and Cellular Biology 18:450–458.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.18.1.450

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
79. 1. Helfrich-Förster C

    (2000) Differential control of morning and evening components in the activity rhythm of Drosophila melanogaster--sex-specific differences suggest a different quality of activity

    Journal of Biological Rhythms 15:135–154.

    https://doi.org/10.1177/074873040001500208

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
80. 1. Hentze JL
    2. Carlsson MA
    3. Kondo S
    4. Nässel DR
    5. Rewitz KF

    (2015) The Neuropeptide Allatostatin A Regulates Metabolism and Feeding Decisions in Drosophila

    Scientific Reports 5:11680.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11680

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
81. 1. Hinojosa-Laborde C
    2. Chapa I
    3. Lange D
    4. Haywood JR

    (1999) Gender differences in sympathetic nervous system regulation

    Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology & Physiology 26:122–126.

    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1681.1999.02995.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
82. 1. Hoeker GS
    2. Hood AR
    3. Katra RP
    4. Poelzing S
    5. Pogwizd SM

    (2014) Sex Differences in β-Adrenergic Responsiveness of Action Potentials and Intracellular Calcium Handling in Isolated Rabbit Hearts

    PLOS ONE 9:e111411.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111411

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
83. 1. Hogarth AJ
    2. Mackintosh AF
    3. Mary DASG

    (2007) Gender-related differences in the sympathetic vasoconstrictor drive of normal subjects

    Clinical Science 112:353–361.

    https://doi.org/10.1042/CS20060288

    • Google Scholar
84. 1. Hoshijima K
    2. Inoue K
    3. Higuchi I
    4. Sakamoto H
    5. Shimura Y

    (1991) Control of doublesex alternative splicing by transformer and transformer-2 in Drosophila

    Science 252:833–836.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1902987

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
85. 1. Huang R
    2. Song T
    3. Su H
    4. Lai Z
    5. Qin W
    6. Tian Y
    7. Dong X
    8. Wang L

    (2020) High-fat diet enhances starvation-induced hyperactivity via sensitizing hunger-sensing neurons in Drosophila

    eLife 9:e53103.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.53103

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
86. 1. Huber R
    2. Hill SL
    3. Holladay C
    4. Biesiadecki M
    5. Tononi G
    6. Cirelli C

    (2004) Sleep homeostasis in Drosophila melanogaster

    Sleep 27:628–639.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/27.4.628

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
87. 1. Hudry B
    2. Khadayate S
    3. Miguel-Aliaga I

    (2016) The sexual identity of adult intestinal stem cells controls organ size and plasticity

    Nature 530:344–348.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16953

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
88. 1. Hudry B
    2. de Goeij E
    3. Mineo A
    4. Gaspar P
    5. Hadjieconomou D
    6. Studd C
    7. Mokochinski JB
    8. Kramer HB
    9. Plaçais P-Y
    10. Preat T
    11. Miguel-Aliaga I

    (2019) Sex Differences in Intestinal Carbohydrate Metabolism Promote Food Intake and Sperm Maturation

    Cell 178:901–918.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.07.029

    • Google Scholar
89. 1. Hughson BN
    2. Shimell M
    3. O’Connor MB

    (2021) AKH Signaling in D. melanogaster Alters Larval Development in a Nutrient-Dependent Manner That Influences Adult Metabolism

    Frontiers in Physiology 12:619219.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.619219

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
90. 1. Inoue K
    2. Hoshijima K
    3. Sakamoto H
    4. Shimura Y

    (1990) Binding of the Drosophila sex-lethal gene product to the alternative splice site of transformer primary transcript

    Nature 344:461–463.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/344461a0

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
91. 1. Inoue K
    2. Hoshijima K
    3. Higuchi I
    4. Sakamoto H
    5. Shimura Y

    (1992) Binding of the Drosophila transformer and transformer-2 proteins to the regulatory elements of doublesex primary transcript for sex-specific RNA processing

    PNAS 89:8092–8096.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.89.17.8092

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
92. 1. Isabel G
    2. Martin JR
    3. Chidami S
    4. Veenstra JA
    5. Rosay P

    (2005) AKH-producing neuroendocrine cell ablation decreases trehalose and induces behavioral changes in Drosophila

    American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 288:531–538.

    https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00158.2004

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
93. 1. Ito H
    2. Fujitani K
    3. Usui K
    4. Shimizu-Nishikawa K
    5. Tanaka S
    6. Yamamoto D

    (1996) Sexual orientation in Drosophila is altered by the satori mutation in the sex-determination gene fruitless that encodes a zinc finger protein with a BTB domain

    PNAS 93:9687–9692.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.18.9687

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
94. 1. Jackson AS
    2. Stanforth PR
    3. Gagnon J
    4. Rankinen T
    5. Leon AS
    6. Rao DC
    7. Skinner JS
    8. Bouchard C
    9. Wilmore JH

    (2002) The effect of sex, age and race on estimating percentage body fat from body mass index: The Heritage Family Study

    Ternational Journal of Obesity 26:789–796.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0802006

    • Google Scholar
95. 1. Johnson AA
    2. Stolzing A

    (2019) The role of lipid metabolism in aging, lifespan regulation, and age-related disease

    Aging Cell 18:e13048.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.13048

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
96. 1. Kamareddine L
    2. Robins WP
    3. Berkey CD
    4. Mekalanos JJ
    5. Watnick PI

    (2018) The Drosophila Immune Deficiency Pathway Modulates Enteroendocrine Function and Host Metabolism

    Cell Metabolism 28:449–462.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2018.05.026

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
97. 1. Kang P
    2. Chang K
    3. Liu Y
    4. Bouska M
    5. Birnbaum A
    6. Karashchuk G
    7. Thakore R
    8. Zheng W
    9. Post S
    10. Brent CS
    11. Li S
    12. Tatar M
    13. Bai H

    (2017) Drosophila Kruppel homolog 1 represses lipolysis through interaction with dFOXO

    Scientific Reports 7:16369.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16638-1

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
98. 1. Karastergiou K
    2. Smith SR
    3. Greenberg AS
    4. Fried SK

    (2012) Sex differences in human adipose tissues - the biology of pear shape

    Biology of Sex Differences 3:13.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/2042-6410-3-13

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
99. 1. Kim SK
    2. Rulifson EJ

    (2004) Conserved mechanisms of glucose sensing and regulation by Drosophila corpora cardiaca cells

    Nature 431:316–320.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02897

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
100. 1. Kimura K-I
     2. Urushizaki A
     3. Sato C
     4. Yamamoto D

     (2019) A novel sex difference in Drosophila contact chemosensory neurons unveiled using single cell labeling

     Journal of Neurogenetics 33:116–124.

     https://doi.org/10.1080/01677063.2018.1531858

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
101. Preprint

     1. Kubrak O
     2. Jensen L
     3. Ahrentløv N
     4. Koyama T
     5. Malita A
     6. Naseem MT
     7. Lassen M
     8. Nagy S
     9. Texada MJ
     10. Halberg KA

     (2020) The gut hormone Allatostatin C regulates food intake and metabolic homeostasis under nutrient stress

     bioRxiv.

     https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.05.412874

     • Google Scholar
102. 1. Kühnlein RP

     (2012) Thematic review series: Lipid droplet synthesis and metabolism: from yeast to man Lipid droplet-based storage fat metabolism in Drosophila

     Journal of Lipid Research 53:1430–1436.

     https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.R024299

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
103. 1. Kvitsiani D
     2. Dickson BJ

     (2006) Shared neural circuitry for female and male sexual behaviours in Drosophila

     Current Biology 16:R355–R356.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.04.025

     • Google Scholar
104. 1. Lafontan M
     2. Barbe P
     3. Galitzky J
     4. Tavernier G
     5. Langin D
     6. Carpene C
     7. Bousquet-Melou A
     8. Berlan M

     (1997) Adrenergic regulation of adipocyte metabolism

     Human Reproduction 12:6–20.

     https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/12.suppl_1.6

     • Google Scholar
105. 1. Lease HM
     2. Wolf BO

     (2011) Lipid content of terrestrial arthropods in relation to body size, phylogeny, ontogeny and sex

     Physiological Entomology 36:29–38.

     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3032.2010.00767.x

     • Google Scholar
106. 1. Lee MJ
     2. Goldsworthy GJ

     (1995) The preparation and use of dispersed cells from fat body of Locusta migratoria in a filtration plate assay for adipokinetic peptides

     Analytical Biochemistry 228:155–161.

     https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1995.1327

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
107. 1. Lee G
     2. Hall JC

     (2001) Abnormalities of male-specific FRU protein and serotonin expression in the CNS of fruitless mutants in Drosophila

     The Journal of Neuroscience 21:513–526.

     https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-02-00513.2001

     • Google Scholar
108. 1. Lee G
     2. Park JH

     (2004) Hemolymph sugar homeostasis and starvation-induced hyperactivity affected by genetic manipulations of the adipokinetic hormone-encoding gene in Drosophila melanogaster

     Genetics 167:311–323.

     https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.167.1.311

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
109. 1. Lee B
     2. Barretto EC
     3. Grewal SS

     (2019) TORC1 modulation in adipose tissue is required for organismal adaptation to hypoxia in Drosophila

     Nature Communications 10:1878.

     https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09643-7

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
110. 1. Lehmann M

     (2018) Endocrine and physiological regulation of neutral fat storage in Drosophila

     Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 461:165–177.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2017.09.008

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
111. 1. Li Y
     2. Hoffmann J
     3. Li Y
     4. Stephano F
     5. Bruchhaus I
     6. Fink C
     7. Roeder T

     (2016) Octopamine controls starvation resistance, life span and metabolic traits in Drosophila

     Scientific Reports 6:35359.

     https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35359

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
112. Preprint

     1. Li H
     2. Janssens J
     3. Waegeneer MD
     4. Kolluru SS
     5. Davie K
     6. Gardeux V
     7. Saelens W
     8. David F
     9. Brbić M
     10. Leskovec J

     (2021) Fly Cell Atlas: a single-cell transcriptomic atlas of the adult fruit fly

     bioRxiv.

     https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.04.451050

     • Google Scholar
113. 1. Liao S
     2. Amcoff M
     3. Nässel DR

     (2021) Impact of high-fat diet on lifespan, metabolism, fecundity and behavioral senescence in Drosophila

     Sect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 133:103495.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2020.103495

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
114. 1. Lorenz MW

     (2003) Adipokinetic hormone inhibits the formation of energy stores and egg production in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus

     Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology. Part B, Biochemistry & Molecular Biology 136:197–206.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/s1096-4959(03)00227-6

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
115. 1. Lorenz MW
     2. Gäde G

     (2009) Hormonal regulation of energy metabolism in insects as a driving force for performance

     Tegrative and Comparative Biology 49:380–392.

     https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icp019

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
116. 1. Luong N
     2. Davies CR
     3. Wessells RJ
     4. Graham SM
     5. King MT
     6. Veech R
     7. Bodmer R
     8. Oldham SM

     (2006) Activated FOXO-mediated insulin resistance is blocked by reduction of TOR activity

     Cell Metabolism 4:133–142.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2006.05.013

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
117. 1. Luzier AB
     2. Nawarskas JJ
     3. Añonuevo J
     4. Wilson MF
     5. Kazierad DJ

     (1998) The effects of gender on adrenergic receptor responsiveness

     Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 38:618–624.

     https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1552-4604.1998.tb04468.x

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
118. 1. Masuyama K
     2. Zhang Y
     3. Rao Y
     4. Wang JW

     (2012) Mapping neural circuits with activity-dependent nuclear import of a transcription factor

     Journal of Neurogenetics 26:89–102.

     https://doi.org/10.3109/01677063.2011.642910

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
119. 1. Mathews KW
     2. Cavegn M
     3. Zwicky M

     (2017) Sexual Dimorphism of Body Size Is Controlled by Dosage of the X-Chromosomal Gene Myc and by the Sex-Determining Gene tra in Drosophila

     Genetics 205:1215–1228.

     https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.116.192260

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
120. 1. May CE
     2. Rosander J
     3. Gottfried J
     4. Dennis E
     5. Dus M

     (2020) Dietary sugar inhibits satiation by decreasing the central processing of sweet taste

     eLife 9:e54530.

     https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54530

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
121. 1. McIntosh VJ
     2. Chandrasekera PC
     3. Lasley RD

     (2011) Sex differences and the effects of ovariectomy on the β-adrenergic contractile response

     American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology 301:H1127–H1134.

     https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00711.2010

     • Google Scholar
122. 1. Mellert DJ
     2. Knapp JM
     3. Manoli DS
     4. Meissner GW
     5. Baker BS

     (2010) Midline crossing by gustatory receptor neuron axons is regulated by fruitless, doublesex and the Roundabout receptors

     Development 137:323–332.

     https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.045047

     • Google Scholar
123. 1. Mellert DJ
     2. Williamson WR
     3. Shirangi TR
     4. Card GM
     5. Truman JW

     (2016) Genetic and Environmental Control of Neurodevelopmental Robustness in Drosophila

     PLOS ONE 11:e0155957.

     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155957

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
124. 1. Millington JW
     2. Rideout EJ

     (2018) Sex differences in Drosophila development and physiology

     Current Opinion in Physiology 6:46–56.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cophys.2018.04.002

     • Google Scholar
125. 1. Millington JW
     2. Brownrigg GP
     3. Chao C
     4. Sun Z
     5. Basner-Collins PJ
     6. Wat LW
     7. Hudry B
     8. Miguel-Aliaga I
     9. Rideout EJ

     (2021) Female-biased upregulation of insulin pathway activity mediates the sex difference in Drosophila body size plasticity

     eLife 10:e58341.

     https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58341

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
126. 1. Min S
     2. Chae HS
     3. Jang YH
     4. Choi S
     5. Lee S
     6. Jeong YT
     7. Jones WD
     8. Moon SJ
     9. Kim YJ
     10. Chung J

     (2016) Identification of a Peptidergic Pathway Critical to Satiety Responses in Drosophila

     Current Biology 26:814–820.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.01.029

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
127. 1. Mochanová M
     2. Tomčala A
     3. Svobodová Z
     4. Kodrík D

     (2018) Role of adipokinetic hormone during starvation in Drosophila

     Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology. Part B, Biochemistry & Molecular Biology 226:26–35.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpb.2018.08.004

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
128. 1. Mosher J
     2. Zhang W
     3. Blumhagen RZ
     4. D’Alessandro A
     5. Nemkov T
     6. Hansen KC
     7. Hesselberth JR
     8. Reis T

     (2015) Coordination between Drosophila Arc1 and a specific population of brain neurons regulates organismal fat

     Developmental Biology 405:280–290.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.07.021

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
129. 1. Murphy DJ

     (2001) The biogenesis and functions of lipid bodies in animals, plants and microorganisms

     Progress in Lipid Research 40:325–438.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-7827(01)00013-3

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
130. 1. Nagoshi RN
     2. McKeown M
     3. Burtis KC
     4. Belote JM
     5. Baker BS

     (1988) The control of alternative splicing at genes regulating sexual differentiation in D. melanogaster

     Cell 53:229–236.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(88)90384-4

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
131. 1. Nelson CS
     2. Beck JN
     3. Wilson KA
     4. Pilcher ER
     5. Kapahi P
     6. Brem RB

     (2016) Cross-phenotype association tests uncover genes mediating nutrient response in Drosophila

     BMC Genomics 17:867.

     https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-3137-9

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
132. 1. Neville MC
     2. Nojima T
     3. Ashley E
     4. Parker DJ
     5. Walker J
     6. Southall T
     7. Van de Sande B
     8. Marques AC
     9. Fischer B
     10. Brand AH
     11. Russell S
     12. Ritchie MG
     13. Aerts S
     14. Goodwin SF

     (2014) Male-specific fruitless isoforms target neurodevelopmental genes to specify a sexually dimorphic nervous system

     Current Biology 24:229–241.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.11.035

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
133. 1. Ng AV
     2. Callister R
     3. Johnson DG
     4. Seals DR

     (1993) Age and gender influence muscle sympathetic nerve activity at rest in healthy humans

     Hypertension 21:498–503.

     https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.21.4.498

     • Google Scholar
134. 1. Nojima T
     2. Neville MC
     3. Goodwin SF

     (2014) Fruitless isoforms and target genes specify the sexually dimorphic nervous system underlying Drosophila reproductive behavior

     Fly 8:95–100.

     https://doi.org/10.4161/fly.29132

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
135. 1. Nojima T
     2. Rings A
     3. Allen AM
     4. Otto N
     5. Verschut TA
     6. Billeter JC
     7. Neville MC
     8. Goodwin SF

     (2021) A sex-specific switch between visual and olfactory inputs underlies adaptive sex differences in behavior

     Current Biology 31:1175–1191.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.12.047

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
136. 1. Noyes BE
     2. Katz FN
     3. Schaffer MH

     (1995) Identification and expression of the Drosophila adipokinetic hormone gene

     Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 109:133–141.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/0303-7207(95)03492-p

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
137. 1. Oh Y
     2. Lai JSY
     3. Mills HJ
     4. Erdjument-Bromage H
     5. Giammarinaro B
     6. Saadipour K
     7. Wang JG
     8. Abu F
     9. Neubert TA
     10. Suh GSB

     (2019) A glucose-sensing neuron pair regulates insulin and glucagon in Drosophila

     Nature 574:559–564.

     https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1675-4

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
138. 1. Park Y
     2. Kim YJ
     3. Adams ME

     (2002) Identification of G protein-coupled receptors for Drosophila PRXamide peptides, CCAP, corazonin, and AKH supports a theory of ligand-receptor coevolution

     PNAS 99:11423–11428.

     https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.162276199

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
139. 1. Park A
     2. Tran T
     3. Atkinson NS

     (2018) Monitoring food preference in Drosophila by oligonucleotide tagging

     PNAS 115:9020–9025.

     https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1716880115

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
140. 1. Patel RT
     2. Soulages JL
     3. Hariharasundaram B
     4. Arrese EL

     (2005) Activation of the lipid droplet controls the rate of lipolysis of triglycerides in the insect fat body

     The Journal of Biological Chemistry 280:22624–22631.

     https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M413128200

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
141. 1. Pavlou HJ
     2. Lin AC
     3. Neville MC
     4. Nojima T
     5. Diao F
     6. Chen BE
     7. White BH
     8. Goodwin SF

     (2016) Neural circuitry coordinating male copulation

     eLife 5:e20713.

     https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20713

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
142. 1. Phillips MD
     2. Thomas GH

     (2006) Brush border spectrin is required for early endosome recycling in Drosophila

     Journal of Cell Science 119:1361–1370.

     https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.02839

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
143. 1. Pomatto LCD
     2. Carney C
     3. Shen B
     4. Wong S
     5. Halaszynski K
     6. Salomon MP
     7. Davies KJA
     8. Tower J

     (2017) The Mitochondrial Lon Protease Is Required for Age-Specific and Sex-Specific Adaptation to Oxidative Stress

     Current Biology 27:1–15.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.10.044

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
144. 1. Post S
     2. Liao S
     3. Yamamoto R
     4. Veenstra JA
     5. Nässel DR
     6. Tatar M

     (2019) Drosophila insulin-like peptide dilp1 increases lifespan and glucagon-like Akh expression epistatic to dilp2

     Aging Cell 18:e12863.

     https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.12863

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
145. 1. Power ML
     2. Schulkin J

     (2008) Sex differences in fat storage, fat metabolism, and the health risks from obesity: possible evolutionary origins

     The British Journal of Nutrition 99:931–940.

     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114507853347

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
146. 1. Predel R
     2. Wegener C
     3. Russell WK
     4. Tichy SE
     5. Russell DH
     6. Nachman RJ

     (2004) Peptidomics of CNS-associated neurohemal systems of adult Drosophila melanogaster: A mass spectrometric survey of peptides from individual flies

     The Journal of Comparative Neurology 474:379–392.

     https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.20145

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
147. 1. Rajan A
     2. Perrimon N

     (2012) Drosophila cytokine unpaired 2 regulates physiological homeostasis by remotely controlling insulin secretion

     Cell 151:123–137.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.08.019

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
148. 1. Recazens E
     2. Mouisel E
     3. Langin D

     (2021) Hormone-sensitive lipase: sixty years later

     Progress in Lipid Research 82:101084.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plipres.2020.101084

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
149. 1. Reddiex AJ
     2. Gosden TP
     3. Bonduriansky R
     4. Chenoweth SF

     (2013) Sex-specific fitness consequences of nutrient intake and the evolvability of diet preferences

     The American Naturalist 182:91–102.

     https://doi.org/10.1086/670649

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
150. 1. Regan JC
     2. Khericha M
     3. Dobson AJ
     4. Bolukbasi E
     5. Rattanavirotkul N
     6. Partridge L

     (2016) Sex difference in pathology of the ageing gut mediates the greater response of female lifespan to dietary restriction

     eLife 5:e10956.

     https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10956

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
151. 1. Rezával C
     2. Nojima T
     3. Neville MC
     4. Lin AC
     5. Goodwin SF

     (2014) Sexually dimorphic octopaminergic neurons modulate female postmating behaviors in Drosophila

     Current Biology 24:725–730.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.12.051

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
152. 1. Rezával C
     2. Pattnaik S
     3. Pavlou HJ
     4. Nojima T
     5. Brüggemeier B
     6. D’Souza LAD
     7. Dweck HKM
     8. Goodwin SF

     (2016) Activation of Latent Courtship Circuitry in the Brain of Drosophila Females Induces Male-like Behaviors

     Current Biology 26:2508–2515.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.07.021

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
153. 1. Rideout EJ
     2. Billeter JC
     3. Goodwin SF

     (2007) The sex-determination genes fruitless and doublesex specify a neural substrate required for courtship song

     Current Biology 17:1473–1478.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.07.047

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
154. 1. Rideout EJ
     2. Dornan AJ
     3. Neville MC
     4. Eadie S
     5. Goodwin SF

     (2010) Control of sexual differentiation and behavior by the doublesex gene in Drosophila melanogaster

     Nature Neuroscience 13:458–466.

     https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2515

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
155. 1. Rideout EJ
     2. Narsaiya MS
     3. Grewal SS

     (2015) The Sex Determination Gene transformer Regulates Male-Female Differences in Drosophila Body Size

     PLOS Genetics 11:e1005683.

     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005683

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
156. 1. Robinett CC
     2. Vaughan AG
     3. Knapp JM
     4. Baker BS

     (2010) Sex and the Single Cell II There Is a Time and Place for Sex

     PLOS Biology 8:e1000365.

     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000365

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
157. 1. Roth SW
     2. Bitterman MD
     3. Birnbaum MJ
     4. Bland ML

     (2018) Innate Immune Signaling in Drosophila Blocks Insulin Signaling by Uncoupling PI(3,4,5)P3 Production and Akt Activation

     Cell Reports 22:2550–2556.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.02.033

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
158. 1. Ryner LC
     2. Goodwin SF
     3. Castrillon DH
     4. Anand A
     5. Villella A
     6. Baker BS
     7. Hall JC
     8. Taylor BJ
     9. Wasserman SA

     (1996) Control of male sexual behavior and sexual orientation in Drosophila by the fruitless gene

     Cell 87:1079–1089.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81802-4

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
159. 1. Salz HK
     2. Erickson JW

     (2010) Sex determination in Drosophila: The view from the top

     Fly 4:60–70.

     https://doi.org/10.4161/fly.4.1.11277

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
160. 1. Sato K
     2. Goto J
     3. Yamamoto D

     (2019) Sex Mysteries of the Fly Courtship Master Regulator Fruitless

     Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 13:245.

     https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00245

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
161. 1. Sawala A
     2. Gould AP

     (2017) The sex of specific neurons controls female body growth in Drosophila

     PLOS Biology 15:e2002252.

     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2002252

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
162. 1. Schindelin J
     2. Arganda-Carreras I
     3. Frise E
     4. Kaynig V
     5. Longair M
     6. Pietzsch T
     7. Preibisch S
     8. Rueden C
     9. Saalfeld S
     10. Schmid B
     11. Tinevez J-Y
     12. White DJ
     13. Hartenstein V
     14. Eliceiri K
     15. Tomancak P
     16. Cardona A

     (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis

     Nature Methods 9:676–682.

     https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2019

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
163. 1. Schreiber R
     2. Xie H
     3. Schweiger M

     (2019) Of mice and men: The physiological role of adipose triglyceride lipase (ATGL)

     Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids 1864:880–899.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2018.10.008

     • Google Scholar
164. 1. Scopelliti A
     2. Bauer C
     3. Yu Y
     4. Zhang T
     5. Kruspig B
     6. Murphy DJ
     7. Vidal M
     8. Maddocks ODK
     9. Cordero JB

     (2019) A Neuronal Relay Mediates a Nutrient Responsive Gut/Fat Body Axis Regulating Energy Homeostasis in Adult Drosophila

     Cell Metabolism 29:269–284.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2018.09.021

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
165. 1. Shirangi TR
     2. Wong AM
     3. Truman JW
     4. Stern DL

     (2016) Doublesex Regulates the Connectivity of a Neural Circuit Controlling Drosophila Male Courtship Song

     Developmental Cell 37:533–544.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2016.05.012

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
166. 1. Sieber MH
     2. Spradling AC

     (2015) Steroid Signaling Establishes a Female Metabolic State and Regulates SREBP to Control Oocyte Lipid Accumulation

     Current Biology 25:993–1004.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.02.019

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
167. 1. Siera SG
     2. Cline TW

     (2008) Sexual back talk with evolutionary implications: stimulation of the Drosophila sex-determination gene sex-lethal by its target transformer

     Genetics 180:1963–1981.

     https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.108.093898

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
168. 1. Song W
     2. Veenstra JA
     3. Perrimon N

     (2014) Control of Lipid Metabolism by Tachykinin in Drosophila

     Cell Reports 9:40–47.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2014.08.060

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
169. 1. Song Wei
     2. Cheng D
     3. Hong S
     4. Sappe B
     5. Hu Y
     6. Wei N
     7. Zhu C
     8. O’Connor MB
     9. Pissios P
     10. Perrimon N

     (2017) Midgut-Derived Activin Regulates Glucagon-like Action in the Fat Body and Glycemic Control

     Cell Metabolism 25:386–399.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2017.01.002

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
170. 1. Sosnowski BA
     2. Belote JM
     3. McKeown M

     (1989) Sex-specific alternative splicing of RNA from the transformer gene results from sequence-dependent splice site blockage

     Cell 58:449–459.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(89)90426-1

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
171. 1. Stafford JW
     2. Lynd KM
     3. Jung AY
     4. Gordon MD

     (2012) Integration of taste and calorie sensing in Drosophila

     Journal of Neuroscience 32:14767–14774.

     https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1887-12.2012

     • Google Scholar
172. 1. Staubli F
     2. Jørgensen TJD
     3. Cazzamali G
     4. Williamson M
     5. Lenz C
     6. Søndergaard L
     7. Roepstorff P
     8. Grimmelikhuijzen CJP

     (2002) Molecular identification of the insect adipokinetic hormone receptors

     PNAS 99:3446–3451.

     https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.052556499

     • Google Scholar
173. 1. Sturtevant AH

     (1945) A Gene in Drosophila melanogaster That Transforms Females into Males

     Genetics 30:297–299.

     https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/30.3.297

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
174. 1. Suzawa M
     2. Muhammad NM
     3. Joseph BS
     4. Bland ML

     (2019) The Toll Signaling Pathway Targets the Insulin-like Peptide Dilp6 to Inhibit Growth in Drosophila

     Cell Reports 28:1439–1446.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.07.015

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
175. 1. Sztalryd C
     2. Brasaemle DL

     (2017) The perilipin family of lipid droplet proteins: Gatekeepers of intracellular lipolysis

     Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids 1862:1221–1232.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2017.07.009

     • Google Scholar
176. 1. Taylor BJ
     2. Truman JW

     (1992) Commitment of abdominal neuroblasts in Drosophila to a male or female fate is dependent on genes of the sex-determining hierarchy

     Development 114:625–642.

     https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.114.3.625

     • Google Scholar
177. 1. Teixeira L
     2. Rabouille C
     3. Rørth P
     4. Ephrussi A
     5. Vanzo NF

     (2003) Drosophila Perilipin/ADRP homologue Lsd2 regulates lipid metabolism

     Mechanisms of Development 120:1071–1081.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/s0925-4773(03)00158-8

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
178. 1. Teleman AA
     2. Chen YW
     3. Cohen SM

     (2005) 4E-BP functions as a metabolic brake used under stress conditions but not during normal growth

     Genes & Development 19:1844–1848.

     https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.341505

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
179. 1. Tennessen JM
     2. Barry WE
     3. Cox J
     4. Thummel CS

     (2014) Methods for studying metabolism in Drosophila

     Methods 68:105–115.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.02.034

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
180. 1. Texada MJ
     2. Jørgensen AF
     3. Christensen CF
     4. Koyama T
     5. Malita A
     6. Smith DK
     7. Marple DFM
     8. Danielsen ET
     9. Petersen SK
     10. Hansen JL
     11. Halberg KA
     12. Rewitz KF

     (2019) A fat-tissue sensor couples growth to oxygen availability by remotely controlling insulin secretion

     Nature Communications 10:1955.

     https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09943-y

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
181. 1. Thiele C
     2. Spandl J

     (2008) Cell biology of lipid droplets

     Current Opinion in Cell Biology 20:378–385.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2008.05.009

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
182. 1. Thurmond J
     2. Goodman JL
     3. Strelets VB
     4. Attrill H
     5. Gramates LS
     6. Marygold SJ
     7. Matthews BB
     8. Millburn G
     9. Antonazzo G
     10. Trovisco V
     11. Kaufman TC
     12. Calvi BR
     13. FlyBase Consortium

     (2019) FlyBase 2.0: the next generation

     Nucleic Acids Research 47:D759–D765.

     https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1003

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
183. 1. Tian Y
     2. Bi J
     3. Shui G
     4. Liu Z
     5. Xiang Y
     6. Liu Y
     7. Wenk MR
     8. Yang H
     9. Huang X

     (2011) Tissue-autonomous function of Drosophila seipin in preventing ectopic lipid droplet formation

     PLOS Genetics 7:e1001364.

     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001364

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
184. 1. Ugrankar R
     2. Liu Y
     3. Provaznik J
     4. Schmitt S
     5. Lehmann M

     (2011) Lipin is a central regulator of adipose tissue development and function in Drosophila melanogaster

     Molecular and Cellular Biology 31:1646–1656.

     https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01335-10

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
185. 1. Videlier M
     2. Rundle HD
     3. Careau V

     (2019) Sex-Specific Among-Individual Covariation in Locomotor Activity and Resting Metabolic Rate in Drosophila melanogaster

     The American Naturalist 194:E164–E176.

     https://doi.org/10.1086/705678

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
186. 1. von Philipsborn AC
     2. Jörchel S
     3. Tirian L
     4. Demir E
     5. Morita T
     6. Stern DL
     7. Dickson BJ

     (2014) Cellular and behavioral functions of fruitless isoforms in Drosophila courtship

     Current Biology 24:242–251.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.12.015

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
187. 1. Walther TC
     2. Farese RV

     (2012) Lipid Droplets and Cellular Lipid Metabolism

     Annual Review of Biochemistry 81:687–714.

     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-061009-102430

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
188. 1. Wang H
     2. Becuwe M
     3. Housden BE
     4. Chitraju C
     5. Porras AJ
     6. Graham MM
     7. Liu XN
     8. Thiam AR
     9. Savage DB
     10. Agarwal AK
     11. Garg A
     12. Olarte MJ
     13. Lin Q
     14. Fröhlich F
     15. Hannibal-Bach HK
     16. Upadhyayula S
     17. Perrimon N
     18. Kirchhausen T
     19. Ejsing CS
     20. Walther TC
     21. Farese RV

     (2016) Seipin is required for converting nascent to mature lipid droplets

     eLife 5:e16582.

     https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16582

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
189. 1. Wang F
     2. Wang K
     3. Forknall N
     4. Patrick C
     5. Yang T
     6. Parekh R
     7. Bock D
     8. Dickson BJ

     (2020) Neural circuitry linking mating and egg laying in Drosophila females

     Nature 579:101–105.

     https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2055-9

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
190. 1. Wat LW
     2. Chao C
     3. Bartlett R
     4. Buchanan JL
     5. Millington JW
     6. Chih HJ
     7. Chowdhury ZS
     8. Biswas P
     9. Huang V
     10. Shin LJ
     11. Wang LC
     12. Gauthier M-PL
     13. Barone MC
     14. Montooth KL
     15. Welte MA
     16. Rideout EJ

     (2020) A role for triglyceride lipase brummer in the regulation of sex differences in Drosophila fat storage and breakdown

     PLOS Biology 18:e3000595.

     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000595

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
191. 1. Watanabe LP
     2. Riddle NC

     (2021) GWAS reveal a role for the central nervous system in regulating weight and weight change in response to exercise

     Scientific Reports 11:5144.

     https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84534-w

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
192. 1. Wegener C
     2. Reinl T
     3. Jänsch L
     4. Predel R

     (2006) Direct mass spectrometric peptide profiling and fragmentation of larval peptide hormone release sites in Drosophila melanogaster reveals tagma-specific peptide expression and differential processing

     Journal of Neurochemistry 96:1362–1374.

     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03634.x

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
193. 1. White K
     2. Tahaoglu E
     3. Steller H

     (1996) Cell killing by the Drosophila gene reaper

     Science 271:805–807.

     https://doi.org/10.1126/science.271.5250.805

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
194. 1. Womersley J
     2. Durnin JVGA

     (1977) A comparison of the skinfold method with extent of “overweight” and various weight-height relationships in the assessment of obesity

     The British Journal of Nutrition 38:271–284.

     https://doi.org/10.1079/bjn19770088

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
195. 1. Yoshinari Y
     2. Kosakamoto H
     3. Kamiyama T
     4. Hoshino R
     5. Matsuoka R
     6. Kondo S
     7. Tanimoto H
     8. Nakamura A
     9. Obata F
     10. Niwa R

     (2021) The sugar-responsive enteroendocrine neuropeptide F regulates lipid metabolism through glucagon-like and insulin-like hormones in Drosophila melanogaster

     Nature Communications 12:4818.

     https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25146-w

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
196. 1. Zhan YP
     2. Liu L
     3. Zhu Y

     (2016) Taotie neurons regulate appetite in Drosophila

     Nature Communications 7:13633.

     https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13633

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
197. 1. Zhao X
     2. Karpac J

     (2017) Muscle Directs Diurnal Energy Homeostasis through a Myokine-Dependent Hormone Module in Drosophila

     Current Biology 27:1941–1955.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.004

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Lianna W Wat

   Department of Cellular and Physiological Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6998-0594

2. Zahid S Chowdhury

   Department of Cellular and Physiological Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

3. Jason W Millington

   Department of Cellular and Physiological Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

   Contribution

   Investigation

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4330-2431

4. Puja Biswas

   Department of Cellular and Physiological Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

   Contribution

   Investigation

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

5. Elizabeth J Rideout

   Department of Cellular and Physiological Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing

   For correspondence

   elizabeth.rideout@ubc.ca

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0012-2828

• 11,947

  views

• 483

  downloads

• 29

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.