Investigating phenotypes of pulmonary COVID-19 recovery - a longitudinal observational prospective multicenter trial

  1. Thomas Sonnweber
  2. Piotr Tymoszuk
  3. Sabina Sahanic
  4. Anna Boehm
  5. Alex Pizzini
  6. Anna Luger
  7. Christoph Schwabl
  8. Manfred Nairz
  9. Philipp Grubwieser
  10. Katharina Kurz
  11. Sabine Koppelstätter
  12. Magdalena Aichner
  13. Bernhard Puchner
  14. Alexander Egger
  15. Gregor Hoermann
  16. Ewald Wöll
  17. Günter Weiss
  18. Gerlig Widmann
  19. Ivan Tancevski  Is a corresponding author
  20. Judith Löffler-Ragg  Is a corresponding author
  1. Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria
  2. Data Analytics As a Service Tirol, Austria
  3. The Karl Landsteiner Institute, Austria
  4. University Hospital Innsbruck, Austria
  5. St. Vinzenz Hospital, Austria

Abstract

Background: The optimal procedures to prevent, identify, monitor and treat long-term pulmonary sequelae of COVID-19 are elusive. Here, we characterized the kinetics of respiratory and symptom recovery following COVID-19.

Methods: We conducted a longitudinal, multi-center observational study in ambulatory and hospitalized COVID-19 patients recruited in early 2020 (n = 145). Pulmonary computed tomography (CT) and lung function (LF) readouts, symptom prevalence, clinical and laboratory parameters were collected during acute COVID-19 and at 60-, 100- and 180-days follow-up visits. Recovery kinetics and risk factors were investigated by logistic regression. Classification of clinical features and participants was accomplished by unsupervised and semi-supervised multi-parameter clustering and machine learning.

Results: At the six-month follow-up, 49% of participants reported persistent symptoms. The frequency of structural lung CT abnormalities ranged from 18% in the mild outpatient cases to 76% in the ICU convalescents. Prevalence of impaired LF ranged from 14% in the mild outpatient cases to 50% in the ICU survivors. Incomplete radiological lung recovery was associated with increased anti-S1/S2 antibody titer, IL-6 and CRP levels at the early follow-up. We demonstrated that the risk of perturbed pulmonary recovery could be robustly estimated at early follow-up by clustering and machine learning classifiers employing solely non-CT and non-LF parameters.

Conclusion: The severity of acute COVID-19 and protracted systemic inflammation is strongly linked to persistent structural and functional lung abnormality. Automated screening of multi-parameter health record data may assist at the prediction of incomplete pulmonary recovery and optimize COVID-19 follow-up management.

Funding: The State of Tyrol (GZ 71934), Boehringer Ingelheim/Investigator initiated study (IIS 1199-0424).

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04416100

Data availability

The complete R analysis pipeline and the anonymized study data in form of stratified study variables are available as a public GitHub repository: https://github.com/PiotrTymoszuk/CovILD_6_Months. The R code for the key tools used for uni-variate modeling and model quality control (Figures 4 and 5, https://github.com/PiotrTymoszuk/lm_qc_tools) as well as cluster analysis and its quality control (Figures 6 - 7, https://github.com/PiotrTymoszuk/clustering-tools-2) is available at GitHub.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Thomas Sonnweber

    Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Piotr Tymoszuk

    Data Analytics As a Service Tirol, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    Piotr Tymoszuk, owns his own business, Data Analytics as a Service Tirol, for which he performs freelance data science work. Has also received an honorarium for the study data management, curation and analysis and minor manuscript work. The author has no other competing interests to declare..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0398-6034
  3. Sabina Sahanic

    Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Anna Boehm

    Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Alex Pizzini

    Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Anna Luger

    Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0445-8372
  7. Christoph Schwabl

    Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Manfred Nairz

    Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Philipp Grubwieser

    Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Katharina Kurz

    Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Sabine Koppelstätter

    Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Magdalena Aichner

    Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Bernhard Puchner

    The Karl Landsteiner Institute, Muenster, Austria
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Alexander Egger

    Central Institute of Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics, University Hospital Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Gregor Hoermann

    Central Institute of Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics, University Hospital Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. Ewald Wöll

    Department of Internal Medicine, St. Vinzenz Hospital, Zams, Austria
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  17. Günter Weiss

    Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  18. Gerlig Widmann

    Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  19. Ivan Tancevski

    Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    For correspondence
    Ivan.Tancevski@i-med.ac.at
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  20. Judith Löffler-Ragg

    Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    For correspondence
    Judith.Loeffler@i-med.ac.at
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0873-7501

Funding

Landes Tirols (GZ 71934)

  • Judith Löffler-Ragg

Boehringer Ingelheim (IIS 1199-0424)

  • Ivan Tancevski

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: All participants gave written informed consent. The study was approved by the institutional review board at the Medical University of Innsbruck (approval number: 1103/2020), and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04416100).

Copyright

© 2022, Sonnweber et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Thomas Sonnweber
  2. Piotr Tymoszuk
  3. Sabina Sahanic
  4. Anna Boehm
  5. Alex Pizzini
  6. Anna Luger
  7. Christoph Schwabl
  8. Manfred Nairz
  9. Philipp Grubwieser
  10. Katharina Kurz
  11. Sabine Koppelstätter
  12. Magdalena Aichner
  13. Bernhard Puchner
  14. Alexander Egger
  15. Gregor Hoermann
  16. Ewald Wöll
  17. Günter Weiss
  18. Gerlig Widmann
  19. Ivan Tancevski
  20. Judith Löffler-Ragg
(2022)
Investigating phenotypes of pulmonary COVID-19 recovery - a longitudinal observational prospective multicenter trial
eLife 11:e72500.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72500

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72500

Further reading

    1. Medicine
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    3. Epidemiology and Global Health
    4. Immunology and Inflammation
    Edited by Jos WM van der Meer et al.
    Collection

    eLife has published articles on a wide range of infectious diseases, including COVID-19, influenza, tuberculosis, HIV/AIDS, malaria and typhoid fever.

    1. Epidemiology and Global Health
    Yuan Zhang, Dan Tang ... Xing Zhao
    Research Article

    Background:

    Biological aging exhibits heterogeneity across multi-organ systems. However, it remains unclear how is lifestyle associated with overall and organ-specific aging and which factors contribute most in Southwest China.

    Methods:

    This study involved 8396 participants who completed two surveys from the China Multi-Ethnic Cohort (CMEC) study. The healthy lifestyle index (HLI) was developed using five lifestyle factors: smoking, alcohol, diet, exercise, and sleep. The comprehensive and organ-specific biological ages (BAs) were calculated using the Klemera–Doubal method based on longitudinal clinical laboratory measurements, and validation were conducted to select BA reflecting related diseases. Fixed effects model was used to examine the associations between HLI or its components and the acceleration of validated BAs. We further evaluated the relative contribution of lifestyle components to comprehension and organ systems BAs using quantile G-computation.

    Results:

    About two-thirds of participants changed HLI scores between surveys. After validation, three organ-specific BAs (the cardiopulmonary, metabolic, and liver BAs) were identified as reflective of specific diseases and included in further analyses with the comprehensive BA. The health alterations in HLI showed a protective association with the acceleration of all BAs, with a mean shift of –0.19 (95% CI −0.34, –0.03) in the comprehensive BA acceleration. Diet and smoking were the major contributors to overall negative associations of five lifestyle factors, with the comprehensive BA and metabolic BA accounting for 24% and 55% respectively.

    Conclusions:

    Healthy lifestyle changes were inversely related to comprehensive and organ-specific biological aging in Southwest China, with diet and smoking contributing most to comprehensive and metabolic BA separately. Our findings highlight the potential of lifestyle interventions to decelerate aging and identify intervention targets to limit organ-specific aging in less-developed regions.

    Funding:

    This work was primarily supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82273740) and Sichuan Science and Technology Program (Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province, Grant No. 2024NSFSC0552). The CMEC study was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFC0907305, 2017YFC0907300). The sponsors had no role in the design, analysis, interpretation, or writing of this article.