Temporal transcriptional response of Candida glabrata during macrophage infection reveals a multifaceted transcriptional regulator CgXbp1 important for macrophage response and fluconazole resistance

Abstract

Candida glabrata can thrive inside macrophages and tolerate high levels of azole antifungals. These innate abilities render infections by this human pathogen a clinical challenge. How C. glabrata reacts inside macrophages and what is the molecular basis of its drug tolerance are not well understood. Here, we mapped genome-wide RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) occupancy in C. glabrata to delineate its transcriptional responses during macrophage infection in high temporal resolution. RNAPII profiles revealed dynamic C. glabrata responses to macrophages with genes of specialized pathways activated chronologically at different times of infection. We identified an uncharacterized transcription factor (CgXbp1) important for the chronological macrophage response, survival in macrophages, and virulence. Genome-wide mapping of CgXbp1 direct targets further revealed its multi-faceted functions, regulating not only virulence-related genes but also genes associated with drug resistance. Finally, we showed that CgXbp1 indeed also affects fluconazole resistance. Overall, this work presents a powerful approach for examining host-pathogen interaction and uncovers a novel transcription factor important for C. glabrata's survival in macrophages and drug tolerance.

Data availability

RNAPII ChIP-seq, CgXbp1MYC ChIP-seq and RNAseq data are available from the NCBI SRA database under the accession number PRJNA665114, PRJNA743592 and PRJNA1162247, respectively.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Maruti Nandan Rai

    Faculty of health sciences, University of Macau, Taipa, Macao
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Qing Lan

    Faculty of health sciences, University of Macau, Taipa, Macao
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Chirag Parsania

    Faculty of health sciences, University of Macau, Taipa, Macao
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Rikky Rai

    Faculty of health sciences, University of Macau, Taipa, Macao
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Niranjan Shirgaonkar

    Faculty of health sciences, University of Macau, Taipa, Macao
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6078-1409
  6. Ruiwen Chen

    Faculty of health sciences, University of Macau, Taipa, Macao
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Li Shen

    Faculty of health sciences, University of Macau, Taipa, Macao
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Kaeling Tan

    Faculty of health sciences, University of Macau, Taipa, Macao
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Koon Ho Wong

    Faculty of health sciences, University of Macau, Taipa, Macao
    For correspondence
    koonhowong@um.edu.mo
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9264-5118

Funding

Research Services and Knowledge Transfer Office, University of Macau (MYRG2019-00099-FHS)

  • Koon Ho Wong

Fundo para o Desenvolvimento das Ciências e da Tecnologia (0033/2021/A1)

  • Koon Ho Wong

Research Services and Knowledge Transfer Office, University of Macau (MYRG2022-00107-FHS)

  • Koon Ho Wong

Fundo para o Desenvolvimento das Ciências e da Tecnologia (0099/2022/A2)

  • Koon Ho Wong

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2024, Rai et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Maruti Nandan Rai
  2. Qing Lan
  3. Chirag Parsania
  4. Rikky Rai
  5. Niranjan Shirgaonkar
  6. Ruiwen Chen
  7. Li Shen
  8. Kaeling Tan
  9. Koon Ho Wong
(2024)
Temporal transcriptional response of Candida glabrata during macrophage infection reveals a multifaceted transcriptional regulator CgXbp1 important for macrophage response and fluconazole resistance
eLife 13:e73832.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73832

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73832

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Moran Kelbert, Antonio Jordán-Pla ... Mordechai Choder
    Research Article

    To function effectively as an integrated system, the transcriptional and post-transcriptional machineries must communicate through mechanisms that are still poorly understood. Here, we focus on the zinc-finger Sfp1, known to regulate transcription of proliferation-related genes. We show that Sfp1 can regulate transcription either by binding to promoters, like most known transcription activators, or by binding to the transcribed regions (gene bodies), probably via RNA polymerase II (Pol II). We further studied the first mode of Sfp1 activity and found that, following promoter binding, Sfp1 binds to gene bodies and affects Pol II configuration, manifested by dissociation or conformational change of its Rpb4 subunit and increased backtracking. Surprisingly, Sfp1 binds to a subset of mRNAs co-transcriptionally and stabilizes them. The interaction between Sfp1 and its client mRNAs is controlled by their respective promoters and coincides with Sfp1’s dissociation from chromatin. Intriguingly, Sfp1 dissociation from the chromatin correlates with the extent of the backtracked Pol II. We propose that, following promoter recruitment, Sfp1 accompanies Pol II and regulates backtracking. The backtracked Pol II is more compatible with Sfp1’s relocation to the nascent transcripts, whereupon Sfp1 accompanies these mRNAs to the cytoplasm and regulates their stability. Thus, Sfp1’s co-transcriptional binding imprints the mRNA fate, serving as a paradigm for the cross-talk between the synthesis and decay of specific mRNAs, and a paradigm for the dual-role of some zinc-finger proteins. The interplay between Sfp1’s two modes of transcription regulation remains to be examined.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    James Lee, Leman Simpson ... Lu Bai
    Research Article

    Some transcription factors (TFs) can form liquid–liquid phase separated (LLPS) condensates. However, the functions of these TF condensates in 3-Dimentional (3D) genome organization and gene regulation remain elusive. In response to methionine (met) starvation, budding yeast TF Met4 and a few co-activators, including Met32, induce a set of genes involved in met biosynthesis. Here, we show that the endogenous Met4 and Met32 form co-localized puncta-like structures in yeast nuclei upon met depletion. Recombinant Met4 and Met32 form mixed droplets with LLPS properties in vitro. In relation to chromatin, Met4 puncta co-localize with target genes, and at least a subset of these target genes is clustered in 3D in a Met4-dependent manner. A MET3pr-GFP reporter inserted near several native Met4-binding sites becomes co-localized with Met4 puncta and displays enhanced transcriptional activity. A Met4 variant with a partial truncation of an intrinsically disordered region (IDR) shows less puncta formation, and this mutant selectively reduces the reporter activity near Met4-binding sites to the basal level. Overall, these results support a model where Met4 and co-activators form condensates to bring multiple target genes into a vicinity with higher local TF concentrations, which facilitates a strong response to methionine depletion.