One of the most fundamental sensory cell types that emerged in animal evolution is the mechanosensory cell – the specialized sensory epithelial cell that transduces mechanical stimuli (e.g. water vibration) into internal signals. These signals are then communicated, usually via the nervous system, to effector cells (e.g. muscle cells) to elicit behavioral and/or physiological responses of the organism. Indeed, specialized mechanosensory cells are found across diverse animal lineages, from vertebrate hair cells, cephalopod angular acceleration receptors, to statocyst cells of cnidarian jellyfish and ctenophores. Typically, a mechanosensory cell bears an apical mechanosensory apparatus consisting of a single non-motile cilium surrounded by a circle of rigid microvilli with actin rootlets (i.e. stereovilli, or stereocilia), and extends basal neuronal processes that connect to the nervous system (reviewed in Beisel et al., 2008; Budelmann, 1989; Manley and Ladher, 2008).

The structure of animal mechanosensory cells is not uniform, however (reviewed in Bezares-Calderón et al., 2020). For instance, insect and cephalopod mechanosensory cells lack stereovilli (Jarman, 2002; Budelmann, 1989), while the apical mechanosensory apparatus of vertebrate hair cells is differently shaped, having a cilium on one side of a group of stereovilli of graded lengths, with the stereovilli next to the cilium being the longest (Fain, 2003). The observed morphological diversity in mechanosensory cells of distantly related animals has led to a fundamental question in animal mechanoreceptor evolution: whether the diversity evolved by divergence from a common ancestral form (Beisel et al., 2008; Jørgensen, 1989; Schlosser, 2020), or by independent evolution (Coffin et al., 2004; Holland, 2005). Addressing this question requires an understanding of the mechanisms of mechanoreceptor development across disparate groups of animals.

Developmental genetics of mechanosensory cells has been extensively studied in bilaterian models such as vertebrates and flies (reviewed in Schlosser, 2020; Boekhoff-Falk, 2005; Beisel et al., 2008). Yet, relatively little is known about the genetics of mechanoreceptor development in non-bilaterian, early-evolving animal groups such as Cnidaria (e.g. jellyfish, corals, and sea anemones), Ctenophora (combjellies), Placozoa and Porifera (sponges), the knowledge of which is key to defining the ancestral conditions for mechanoreceptor development basal to Bilateria. This baseline knowledge, in turn, is necessary for reconstructing how mechanoreceptors diversified in each lineage. In this paper, we focus on investigating the development of a fundamental, yet understudied, mechanosensory cell type of Cnidaria – the concentric hair cell.

Cnidaria is the sister group to Bilateria (Medina et al., 2001; Putnam et al., 2007; Hejnol et al., 2009; Erwin et al., 2011), and has two broad classes of mechanosensory cells – cnidocytes (Brinkmann et al., 1996) and concentric hair cells (Arkett et al., 1988; Oliver and Thurm, 1996; Holtmann and Thurm, 2001; not to be confused with vertebrate hair cells) – that are characterized by an apical mechanosensory apparatus consisting of a single cilium surrounded by a ring of stereovilli. The cnidocyte is the phylum-defining stinging cell type, and additionally contains a cnidarian-specific exocytotic organelle called the cnida (plural: cnidae) which is made up of a capsule enclosing a coiled tubule (reviewed in Thomas and Edwards, 1991; Lesh-Laurie and Suchy, 1991; Fautin and Mariscal, 1991). Cnidocytes are abundant in the ectodermal epithelium of cnidarian tentacles, and, upon perceiving mechanical stimuli, discharge cnidae by rapidly everting the coiled tubule to pierce nearby animals for defense and/or prey capture. There is no structural or functional evidence that the cnidocyte transmits sensory information to other cells, but firing of cnidae is thought to be modulated by neurons that innervate cnidocytes through chemical synapses (Westfall, 2004). Thus, the cnidocyte is a cnidarian-specific mechanosensory cell type that – uniquely among animal mechanosensory cells – functions as an effector cell.

The cnidarian hair cell, on the other hand, represents the classical mechanosensory cell type with dedicated sensory-neuronal function. Hair cells are integrated within the ectodermal epithelium of mechanosensory structures, such as gravity sensors of jellyfishes and tentacles of hydroids and corals (Horridge, 1969; Lyons, 1973; Tardent and Schmid, 1972; Singla, 1975; Hündgen and Biela, 1982). Structurally, the cnidarian hair cell exhibits the stereotypical mechanosensory neuron-like morphology described above, including the apical mechanosensory apparatus and basal neurites that become part of the basiepithelial nerve plexus (Horridge, 1969; Singla, 1975; Singla, 1983; Hündgen and Biela, 1982). Upon stimulation, the hair cells communicate mechanosensory information to other cells by converting mechanical stimuli into internal electrical signals (Arkett et al., 1988; Oliver and Thurm, 1996), and are thought to generate highly coordinated response behaviors such as righting and feeding. Similar to vertebrate hair cells, hair cells of jellyfish gravity sensors are sensitive to sound and can be lost due to noise trauma (Solé et al., 2016). Cnidarian hair cells show morphological and functional characteristics that parallel those of mechanosensory cells in other animal lineages, consistent with a deep evolutionary origin or convergent origins.

Although genetics of cnidocyte development is increasingly understood (e.g. Babonis and Martindale, 2017; Richards and Rentzsch, 2015; Richards and Rentzsch, 2014; Wolenski et al., 2013), that of cnidarian hair cell development remains poorly known. This knowledge gap severely limits our ability to reconstruct the evolutionary histories of mechanoreceptor development within Cnidaria and across the basal branches of the animal tree. A previous study has shown that the class IV POU homeodomain transcription factor (POU-IV or Brn-3)-encoding gene is expressed in the hair-cell-bearing mechanosensory organ called the touch plate in moon jellyfish Aurelia sp.1 (Nakanishi et al., 2010), consistent with a role in cnidarian hair cell development. Yet, the function of POU-IV in cnidarian hair cell development, if any, remains undefined. As the first step toward elucidating the genetic mechanism of cnidarian hair cell development, here we dissect the role of POU-IV in the development of mechanosensory hair cells using the genetically tractable sea anemone cnidarian model Nematostella vectensis.

POU-IV is shared by all extant animal groups except for Ctenophora (comb jellies), indicative of early emergence in animal evolution (Gold et al., 2014). POU-IV is absent in choanoflagellates, although the class II POU-like gene has been reported to be present in Mylnosiga fluctuans indicative of a premetazoan origin of POU transcription factors (López-Escardó et al., 2019). As in other POU proteins, POU-IV is characterized by having a bipartite DNA-binding domain consisting of the N-terminal POU-specific domain and the C-terminal POU homeodomain (reviewed in Herr and Cleary, 1995). In Bilateria, POU-IV-binding DNA elements are POU-IV-class-specific and conserved; mammalian POU-IV proteins Brn3.0 (Brn-3a or POU4F1) and Brn3.2 (Brn-3b or POU4F2) and Caenorhabditis elegans POU-IV protein Unc-86 bind to a highly symmetrical core sequence AT(A/T)A(T/A)T(A/T)AT (Gruber et al., 1997). In bilaterian animal models such as C. elegans, POU-IV is known to function as a terminal selector – a transcription factor that determines mature cell identity via direct regulation of effector genes (reviewed in Leyva-Díaz et al., 2020). The cell type whose identity is defined by POU-IV across bilaterian lineages is the mechanosensory cell. In humans, mutations at one of the pou-iv loci – Brn-3c (Brn3.1 or POU4F3) – have been linked to autosomal dominant hearing loss (Vahava et al., 1998), and in Brn-3c knockout mice, auditory and vestibular hair cells fail to complete differentiation (Erkman et al., 1996; Xiang et al., 1997b) and are lost by cell death (Xiang et al., 1998). Likewise, in C. elegans, the pou-iv ortholog (unc-86) regulates differentiation of mechanosensory touch cells (Chalfie and Sulston, 1981; Chalfie and Au, 1989; Finney and Ruvkun, 1990; Duggan et al., 1998). In addition to its role in mechanoreceptor differentiation, POU-IV defines the identity of olfactory chemosensory neurons in Drosophila (Clyne et al., 1999), as well as retinal ganglion cells (Brn-3b; Erkman et al., 1996; Gan et al., 1996) and subsets of CNS neurons in mice (Brn-3a; Serrano-Saiz et al., 2018; McEvilly et al., 1996; Xiang et al., 1996). In Cnidaria, POU-IV is expressed not only in the developing mechanoreceptor of Aurelia sp.1 (Nakanishi et al., 2010) as described above, but also in the statocysts of the freshwater hydrozoan jellyfish Craspedacusta sowerbii (Hroudova et al., 2012). Also, POU-IV is required for postmitotic differentiation of cnidocytes, as well as elav::mOrange neurons, in N. vectensis (Tournière et al., 2020). Consistent with cnidarian POU-IV being a terminal selector, a genome-wide analysis of differential gene expression between POU-IV knockout mutant N. vectensis and their siblings indicates that POU-IV controls the expression of effector genes that define mature neural identity, such as those involved in ion channel activity (Tournière et al., 2020). However, it remains unknown if cnidarian POU-IV directly regulates effector gene expression, as expected for a terminal selector. Furthermore, although POU-IV recognition element-like sequences have been previously identified in the N. vectensis genome based on sequence similarity to bilaterian POU-IV-binding motifs (Sebé-Pedrós et al., 2018), cnidarian POU-IV recognition elements have not been experimentally defined, and consequently, whether the conservation of POU-IV-binding sequence extends beyond Bilateria remains unclear.

Sea anemones together with corals form the clade Anthozoa, which is sister to the Medusozoa – a group characterized by typically having a pelagic medusa (jellyfish) stage – consisting of Staurozoa, Hydrozoa, Scyphozoa, and Cubozoa (Collins et al., 2006; Zapata et al., 2015). Sea anemones have multicellular mechanosensory structures, known as the hair bundle mechanoreceptors, in the ectoderm of the oral feeding tentacles (Mire-Thibodeaux and Watson, 1994; Mire and Watson, 1997; Watson et al., 1997). A hair bundle mechanoreceptor consists of a central sensory cell surrounded by peripheral support cells (Figure 1—figure supplement 1). The central sensory cell exhibits morphological hallmarks of concentric hair cells, with an apical cilium surrounded by stereovilli, and basal neurites. Support cells contribute stereovilli or microvilli that encircle the apical ciliary-stereovillar structure of the central hair cell. The cilium and stereovilli of the central cell and stereovilli/microvilli of support cells are interconnected by lateral linkages; in addition, extracellular linkages have been observed between the tips of stereovilli/microvilli of support cells, resembling the tip links of vertebrate mechanosensory hair cells (Watson et al., 1997). The apical sensory apparatus, or the hair bundle, of the mechanoreceptor thus consists of the cilium and stereovilli of the central hair cell and the peripheral stereovilli/microvilli of support cells (Mire and Watson, 1997). We note that in the literature, the support cells of hair bundle mechanoreceptors are sometimes referred to as hair cells (e.g. Mire and Watson, 1997). In this paper, in accordance with the morphological definition of cnidarian hair cells, a hair cell refers to the central sensory cell of the hair bundle mechanoreceptor, and a support cell refers to the cell that abuts the central sensory cell and contributes peripheral stereovilli/microvilli to the hair bundle.

In this report, we use the starlet sea anemone N. vectensis to investigate the role of POU-IV in the development of cnidarian hair cells. N. vectensis is a convenient model for studies of mechanisms of cnidarian development because of the availability of the genome sequence (Putnam et al., 2007) and a wide range of powerful molecular genetic tools including CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing (Ikmi et al., 2014; Nakanishi and Martindale, 2018). During embryogenesis, N. vectensis gastrulates by invagination to form an embryo consisting of ectoderm and endoderm separated by the extracellular matrix known as the mesoglea (Kraus and Technau, 2006; Magie et al., 2007). The blastopore becomes the mouth/anus (‘oral’) opening of the animal (Fritzenwanker et al., 2007; Lee et al., 2007). The embryo develops into a free-swimming, ciliated planula larva, which transforms into a polyp with circumoral tentacles that house mechanosensory hair cells in the ectoderm (Figure 1—figure supplement 2; Nakanishi et al., 2012; Watson et al., 2009). The polyp then grows and reaches sexual maturity. Previous studies have indicated that hair bundles of N. vectensis polyps are indeed sensitive to movement of surrounding water (Watson et al., 2009), and that stereovilli/microvilli of hair bundles express TRP (transient receptor potential)-like cation channels (Mahoney et al., 2011) and a putative extracellular linkage component cadherin 23 (Watson et al., 2008). In the present work, we provide evidence that POU-IV regulates postmitotic differentiation of hair cells by directly activating effector genes that define mature cell identity.

In this paper, we identified the class IV POU homeodomain transcription factor (POU-IV) as an essential developmental regulator of cnidarian mechanosensory hair cells. This is the first discovery of a gene regulatory factor necessary for the development of classical mechanosensory neurons – that transmit mechanosensory information to other cells to elicit coordinated behavior – from a non-bilaterian, early-evolving animal group. Using the starlet sea anemone N. vectensis, we have shown that POU-IV is postmitotically expressed in hair cells in the ectodermal epithelium of feeding tentacles during development. In addition, we have found that null mutation of pou-iv renders the animal unable to respond to tactile stimulation to its tentacles, and results in the loss of stereovillar rootlets, but not of neurites, in hair cells. Furthermore, we have presented evidence that POU-IV binds to deeply conserved DNA sequence motifs, and directly activates the expression of a unique combination of effector genes, but not transcription factor-encoding genes, specifically in hair cells. Among the POU-IV target effector genes, we discovered the first cnidarian hair cell-specific molecular marker, polycystin 1, which encodes a transmembrane receptor of the TRP channel superfamily. The results suggest that POU-IV plays a necessary role in regulating the maturation of mechanosensory hair cells in the sea anemone by directly activating the expression of cell-type-specific effector genes. Our findings strongly support POU-IV being the terminal selector of hair cell identity in the sea anemone.

Several lines of evidence indicate that POU-IV is specifically involved in the maturation, and not progenitor proliferation, initial differentiation, or survival, of hair cells in the tentacular ectoderm in N. vectensis. First, POU-IV is postmitotically expressed in hair cells in tentacular ectoderm, and thus is unlikely to have roles in proliferation or generation of their progenitor cells. Second, in POU-IV null mutants, we have found ciliary-cone-bearing epithelial cells that resemble hair cells in morphology and position within the epithelium; these cells are characterized by having an apical cilium surrounded by a circle of microvilli, a pear-shaped cell body located in the superficial stratum of the pseudostratified epithelium, and basal neurites. None of the ciliary-cone-bearing epithelial cells express the pan-cnidocyte marker minicollagen 3, suggesting that the ciliary-cone-bearing cells in POU-IV null mutants do not represent partially differentiated nematocytes. The existence of differentiated hair cells in POU-IV null mutants implies that POU-IV is not involved in the initial differentiation of hair cells. However, the hair-cell-like cells of POU-IV null mutants failed to form a mature apical mechanosensory apparatus with stereovillar rootlets, indicating that POU-IV is essential for maturation of hair cells. Lastly, we have found no evidence that the epithelial cells expressing the non-functional form of POU-IV protein in POU-IV null mutants undergo programmed cell death in the tentacular ectoderm. Thus, POU-IV does not seem to be required for the survival of hair cells in the tentacles. Taken together, these data support the hypothesis that POU-IV regulates the maturation, but not progenitor proliferation, initial differentiation, or survival, of mechanosensory hair cells in the sea anemone.

The loss of stereovillar rootlets in hair cells in pou-iv mutants suggests that the POU-IV transcription factor regulates the expression of genes that are involved in stereovillar development. Given that stereovillar rootlets consist of actin filaments, actin-binding proteins may be regarded as potential regulators of stereovillar rootlet formation in hair cells. Among the identified POU-IV target genes expressed in hair cells is polycystin 1, which encodes a large transmembrane receptor with multiple extracellular and intracellular domains and TRP-channel-like transmembrane domains. Interestingly, its mouse homolog (PC-1) colocalizes with F-actin in inner ear hair cell stereovilli and is necessary for maintenance of stereovillar structure and normal hearing (Steigelman et al., 2011). In addition, PC-1 has been shown to regulate actin cytoskeleton reorganization in canine kidney epithelial cells (Boca et al., 2007). If the function of Polycystin 1 in modulating the organization of actin cytoskeleton is broadly conserved, N. vectensis Polycystin 1 might control the structural integrity of stereovilli in hair cells through its interaction with F-actin. POU-IV may therefore direct stereovillar development in cnidarian hair cells by activating polycystin 1. Functional analysis of N. vectensis polycystin 1 to evaluate its role in stereovillar development is warranted.

We have proposed that the lack of tentacular response to tactile stimuli in pou-iv mutants is due to the loss of structural rigidity in the apical mechanosensory apparatus – stereovilli, in particular – of hair cells, resulting from the failure of hair cells to form stereovillar rootlets. We note, however, that it could additionally be because of the functional defects in mechanotransduction channels. POU-IV is known to directly activate the expression of the mechanotransduction channel-encoding gene, mec-4, that is necessary for touch-cell function in C. elegans (Duggan et al., 1998). The Polycystin 1 protein discussed above contains transmembrane domains that are homologous to the TRP calcium channel. If this channel is involved in mechanotransduction, the loss of polycystin 1 expression in pou-iv mutants would directly lead to loss of mechanotransduction channel function. This hypothesis may be evaluated by specifically examining the role of the channel-encoding region of N. vectensis polycystin 1 in mechanotransduction.

Alternatively, the loss of polycystin 1 expression may indirectly perturb channel function. In epithelial cells of vertebrate kidneys, Polycystin 1 interacts with the calcium ion channel Polycystin 2 to form a complex that functions as a fluid flow sensor with Polycystin 1 acting as a mechanosensitive cell surface receptor and Polycystin 2 as an ion-permeant pore (reviewed in Delmas, 2004). The N. vectensis genome encodes polycystin 2 (Figure 8—figure supplement 2), which is co-expressed with polycystin 1 in the adult metacell c79 (i.e. the hair cell) (Supplementary file 9; Sebé-Pedrós et al., 2018). If these two proteins form a mechanically gated ion channel complex in hair cells as in vertebrate kidney epithelial cells, the loss of expression of polycystin 1 would perturb the ability of the complex to sense mechanical stimuli, resulting in defects in channel function. To explore this hypothesis, the important next step will be to assess whether Polycystin 1 and 2 form a complex in N. vectensis.

We note that, although our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that cnidarian hair cells function as mechanosensors, we do not rule out the possibility that cnidarian hair cells might be multimodal sensory cells; they might have additional functions as chemoreceptors and/or photoreceptors. Indeed, hair cells of the sea anemone Haliplanella luciae have been reported to respond to N-acetylated sugars by elongating their stereovilli (Mire-Thibodeaux and Watson, 1994, Watson and Roberts, 1995), indicative of chemosensory function. The metacell c79 (the presumptive hair cell) of adult N. vectensis expresses several G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-encoding genes (Supplementary file 14; Sebé-Pedrós et al., 2018), some of which might encode chemosensory receptors; none were found to encode opsins. Functional analyses of these GPCRs may shed light on the molecular basis of sensory multimodality in cnidarian hair cells.

Our results indicate that the role for POU-IV in mechanoreceptor development is broadly conserved across Cnidaria and Bilateria. As mentioned above, one of the vertebrate pou-iv paralogs (Brn3c) is necessary for maturation and survival of inner ear hair cells in mice (Xiang et al., 1998; Xiang et al., 1997a, Erkman et al., 1996). Likewise, in C. elegans, differentiation of mechanosensory touch cells requires a pou-iv ortholog unc-86 (Chalfie and Sulston, 1981; Chalfie and Au, 1989; Finney and Ruvkun, 1990; Duggan et al., 1998; Chalfie et al., 1981). In Cnidaria, pou-iv is expressed in mechanosensory organs in scyphozoan and hydrozoan jellyfish (Nakanishi et al., 2010; Hroudova et al., 2012), and is necessary for differentiation of the lineage-specific mechanosensory-effector cell, the cnidocyte, in N. vectensis (Tournière et al., 2020). In this report, we have demonstrated that pou-iv has an essential role in the maturation of the classical mechanosensory neuron of Cnidaria – the concentric hair cell – using N. vectensis. These comparative data show that POU-IV-dependent regulation of mechanosensory cell differentiation is pervasive across Cnidaria and Bilateria, and likely predates their divergence. How early the role of POU-IV in mechanoreceptor differentiation emerged in animal evolution remains unresolved, and requires comparative data from placozoans and sponges, which are wanting.

We note, however, that POU-IV has a broad role in the differentiation of multiple neural cell types across Cnidaria and Bilateria. In N. vectensis, POU-IV expression is not restricted to mechanosensory hair cells and cnidocytes, but also found in RFamidergic neurons and NvElav1-positive endodermal neurons (Tournière et al., 2020). Likewise in Bilateria, POU-IV regulates the differentiation of a variety of neural cell types beyond mechanosensory cells, including chemosensory neurons in insects (Clyne et al., 1999) and photosensory neurons in vertebrates (retinal ganglion cells; e.g. Erkman et al., 1996; Gan et al., 1996). Therefore, it seems plausible that POU-IV was ancestrally involved in the differentiation of multiple neural cell types in addition to mechanosensory cells.

Interestingly, POU-IV is required for normal development of stereovilli in hair cells in both sea anemones (this study) and mice (Xiang et al., 1998), raising the possibility that POU-IV controlled the formation of the apical sensory apparatus of mechanosensory cells in the last common ancestor of Cnidaria and Bilateria, potentially via regulation of polycyctin 1. Alternatively, the essential role for POU-IV in stereovillar formation in mechanosensory cells could have evolved independently in Cnidaria and vertebrates. Comparative studies of the mechanism of stereovillar formation across sea anemones and vertebrates, along with mechanistic studies of POU-IV gene function in phylogenetically informative taxa, such as medusozoan cnidarians and acoel bilaterians, are needed to evaluate these alternative hypotheses.

Regulatory factors acting upstream of POU-IV in cnidarian hair cell development remain unknown. In Bilateria, members of the Atonal basic-loop-helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factor family appear to have a conserved role in positive regulation of POU-IV expression (reviewed in Leyva-Díaz et al., 2020). For instance, vertebrate atonal genes act upstream of pou-iv genes to drive the differentiation of inner ear hair cells (Ikeda et al., 2015; Masuda et al., 2011; Yu et al., 2021) and retinal ganglion cells (Liu et al., 2001). Similarly, C. elegans atonal ortholog lin-32 controls the expression of the pou-iv ortholog unc-86 in touch sensory neurons (Baumeister et al., 1996). Although cnidarians lack unambiguous atonal orthologs, they have divergent bHLH genes that belong to the Atonal superfamily, which consists of Atonal and related bHLH gene families including Neurogenin, and NeuroD (Gyoja et al., 2012; Simionato et al., 2007). Whether these atonal-like bHLH factors function upstream of POU-IV in the context of cnidarian hair cell development needs to be assessed, as it may provide insights into the evolution of gene regulatory mechanisms underpinning mechanoreceptor development across Cnidaria and Bilateria.

In light of new comparative data reported herein emerges a model of mechanosensory cell differentiation in the last common ancestor of Cnidaria and Bilateria. We assume that the embryo of the Cnidaria-Bilateria ancestor had neurogenic ectoderm (Nakanishi et al., 2012). During late embryogenesis or postembryonic development of this ancestor, mechanosensory cell progenitors differentiated into postmitotic sensory cells in the ectoderm, extending apical cilia and basal neurites. These postmitotic sensory cells expressed the terminal selector POU-IV, which translocated to the cell nuclei, and bound to the DNA recognition motif GCAT(A/T)ATT(A/T)AT (i.e. the consensus motif across Bilateria and Cnidaria) associated with target genes in these cells. This activated the expression of effector genes, possibly including polycystin 1, whose protein products generated mechanoreceptor-specific structures necessary for mechanosensory function, such as the apical mechanosensory apparatus consisting of a cilium surrounded by a ring of stereovilli. The mature identity of the mechanosensory cell was thereby established.

Following the divergence of Cnidaria and Bilateria, POU-IV may have been recruited for the evolution of the lineage-specific mechanosensory effector – the cnidocyte – in Cnidaria, as pou-iv is essential for cnidocyte development in N. vectensis (Tournière et al., 2020). How POU-IV would have come to direct cnidocyte development remains unclear. Given that both hair cells and cnidocytes are mechanosensory cell types, it seems reasonable to expect that an ancestral POU-IV gene regulatory network that defined mechanosensory cell identity was repurposed for the emergence of cnidocytes, and should be shared across these two cell types. However, we found no evidence in support of this hypothesis; instead, our results suggest that POU-IV turns on distinct sets of genes in each cell type. One possible evolutionary scenario to account for this observation is that POU-IV initially activated the same battery of effector genes in the ancestral cnidocytes and hair cells, but POU-IV target genes diverged substantially during cnidarian evolution so that they no longer overlap between the two cell types. Another possibility is that POU-IV regulated a unique set of genes in the ancestral cnidocytes when POU-IV became part of the cnidocyte developmental gene regulatory network. This possibility seems conceivable if POU-IV expression was activated in epigenetically distinct cell lineages, so that between the cnidocyte lineage and the hair cell lineage (1) POU-IV cooperated with different co-factors, and/or (2) the accessibility of POU-IV target genes differed, which would result in differential expression of POU-IV target genes. Evidence from bilaterian models such as C. elegans and mice indicates that POU-IV cooperates with a range of different co-factors to define distinct neural identities (reviewed in Leyva-Díaz et al., 2020), suggesting an important role for POU-IV co-factors in the diversification of neural cell types. Whether evolution of POU-IV co-factors played a role in the evolution of cnidocytes remains to be tested. Investigation into the mechanism by which POU-IV activates distinct sets of genes across cnidocytes and hair cells will be the critical next step for shedding light on how POU-IV may have contributed to the evolution of the novel mechanosensory cell type of Cnidaria.

Sequencing data have been deposited in GenBank under an accession number OK338071, and in BioProject database under an accession number PRJNA767103. The scripts for RNA-Seq and ChIP-seq analysis are publicly available at https://github.com/pyrosilesl97/POU-IV_analysis (copy archived at swh:1:rev:463178242d112edab7094c12e093dd780177885b).

1. 1. Nakanishi N

   (2021) NCBI BioProject

   ID PRJNA767103. Cnidarian hair cell development illuminates an ancient role for the class IV POU transcription factor in defining mechanoreceptor identity.

   https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/?term=PRJNA767103
2. 1. Nakanishi N

   (2021) NCBI Nucleotide

   ID OK338071. Nematostella vectensis polycystin-1 mRNA, complete cds.

   https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/OK338071

1. 1. Rentzsch F

   (2020) ArrayExpress

   ID E-MTAB-8658. RNA-seq of Nematostella POU4 mutants at primary polyp stage.

   https://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/experiments/E-MTAB-8658/

1. 1. Anders S
   2. Pyl PT
   3. Huber W

   (2015) HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data

   Bioinformatics 31:166–169.

   https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Ando R
   2. Hama H
   3. Yamamoto-Hino M
   4. Mizuno H
   5. Miyawaki A

   (2002) An optical marker based on the UV-induced green-to-red photoconversion of a fluorescent protein

   PNAS 99:12651–12656.

   https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.202320599

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Arkett SA
   2. Mackie GO
   3. Meech RW

   (1988) Hair Cell Mechanoreception in the Jellyfish Aglantha Digitale

   Journal of Experimental Biology 135:329–342.

   https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.135.1.329

   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Babonis LS
   2. Martindale MQ

   (2017) PaxA, but not PaxC, is required for cnidocyte development in the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis

   EvoDevo 8:14.

   https://doi.org/10.1186/s13227-017-0077-7

   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Bateman A
   2. Sandford R

   (1999) The PLAT domain: a new piece in the PKD1 puzzle

   Current Biology 9:R588–R590.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-9822(99)80380-7

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Baumeister R
   2. Liu Y
   3. Ruvkun G

   (1996) Lineage-specific regulators couple cell lineage asymmetry to the transcription of the Caenorhabditis elegans POU gene unc-86 during neurogenesis

   Genes & Development 10:1395–1410.

   https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.10.11.1395

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
7. Book

   1. Beisel KW
   2. He D
   3. Hallworth R
   4. Fritzsch B

   (2008) 3.05 - Genetics of Mechanoreceptor Evolution and Development

   In: Masland RH, Albright TD, Dallos P, Oertel D, Firestein S, Beauchamp GK, Catherine BM, Basbaum AI, Kaas JH, Gardner EP, editors. The Senses: A Comprehensive Reference. New York: Academic Press. pp. 277–301.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012370880-9.00006-2

   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Bezares-Calderón LA
   2. Berger J
   3. Jékely G

   (2020) Diversity of cilia-based mechanosensory systems and their functions in marine animal behaviour

   Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 375:20190376.

   https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0376

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Boca M
   2. D’Amato L
   3. Distefano G
   4. Polishchuk RS
   5. Germino GG
   6. Boletta A
   7. Mostov K

   (2007) Polycystin-1 Induces Cell Migration by Regulating Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-dependent Cytoskeletal Rearrangements and GSK3β-dependent Cell–Cell Mechanical Adhesion

   Molecular Biology of the Cell 18:4050–4061.

   https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e07-02-0142

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Boekhoff-Falk G

    (2005) Hearing in Drosophila: Development of Johnston’s organ and emerging parallels to vertebrate ear development

    Developmental Dynamics 232:550–558.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.20207

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Bolger AM
    2. Lohse M
    3. Usadel B

    (2014) Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data

    Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Brinkmann M
    2. Oliver D
    3. Thurm U

    (1996) Mechanoelectric transduction in nematocytes of a hydropolyp (Corynidae)

    Journal of Comparative Physiology A 178:125–138.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00189597

    • Google Scholar
13. Book

    1. Budelmann BU

    (1989) Hydrodynamic receptor systems in invertebrates

    In: Coombs S, Gorner P, Munz H, editors. The Mechanosensory Lateral Line: Neurobiology and Evolution. New York: Springer-Verlag. pp. 607–631.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3560-6_31

    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Bycroft M
    2. Bateman A
    3. Clarke J
    4. Hamill SJ
    5. Sandford R
    6. Thomas RL
    7. Chothia C

    (1999) The structure of a PKD domain from polycystin-1: implications for polycystic kidney disease

    The EMBO Journal 18:297–305.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/18.2.297

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Chalfie M
    2. Horvitz HR
    3. Sulston JE

    (1981) Mutations that lead to reiterations in the cell lineages of C. elegans

    Cell 24:59–69.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(81)90501-8

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Chalfie M
    2. Sulston J

    (1981) Developmental genetics of the mechanosensory neurons of Caenorhabditis elegans

    Developmental Biology 82:358–370.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-1606(81)90459-0

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Chalfie M
    2. Au M

    (1989) Genetic control of differentiation of the Caenorhabditis elegans touch receptor neurons

    Science 243:1027–1033.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2646709

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Clyne PJ
    2. Certel SJ
    3. de Bruyne M
    4. Zaslavsky L
    5. Johnson WA
    6. Carlson JR

    (1999) The odor specificities of a subset of olfactory receptor neurons are governed by Acj6, a POU-domain transcription factor

    Neuron 22:339–347.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/s0896-6273(00)81094-6

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
19. Book

    1. Coffin A
    2. Kelley M
    3. Manley GA
    4. Popper AN

    (2004) Evolution of sensory hair cells

    In: Coffin A, editors. Springer Handbook of Auditory Research. Switzerland: Springer Nature. pp. 55–94.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8957-4

    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Collins AG
    2. Schuchert P
    3. Marques AC
    4. Jankowski T
    5. Medina M
    6. Schierwater B

    (2006) Medusozoan phylogeny and character evolution clarified by new large and small subunit rDNA data and an assessment of the utility of phylogenetic mixture models

    Systematic Biology 55:97–115.

    https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150500433615

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Danecek P
    2. Bonfield JK
    3. Liddle J
    4. Marshall J
    5. Ohan V
    6. Pollard MO
    7. Whitwham A
    8. Keane T
    9. McCarthy SA
    10. Davies RM
    11. Li H

    (2021) Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools

    GigaScience 10:giab008.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giab008

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Delmas P

    (2004) Polycystins: from mechanosensation to gene regulation

    Cell 118:145–148.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2004.07.007

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Dobin A
    2. Davis CA
    3. Schlesinger F
    4. Drenkow J
    5. Zaleski C
    6. Jha S
    7. Batut P
    8. Chaisson M
    9. Gingeras TR

    (2013) STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner

    Bioinformatics 29:15–21.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Duggan A
    2. Ma C
    3. Chalfie M

    (1998) Regulation of touch receptor differentiation by the Caenorhabditis elegans mec-3 and unc-86 genes

    Development 125:4107–4119.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.125.20.4107

    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Edgar RC

    (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput

    Nucleic Acids Research 32:1792–1797.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Erkman L
    2. McEvilly RJ
    3. Luo L
    4. Ryan AK
    5. Hooshmand F
    6. O’Connell SM
    7. Keithley EM
    8. Rapaport DH
    9. Ryan AF
    10. Rosenfeld MG

    (1996) Role of transcription factors a Brn-3.1 and Brn-3.2 in auditory and visual system development

    Nature 381:603–606.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/381603a0

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Erwin DH
    2. Laflamme M
    3. Tweedt SM
    4. Sperling EA
    5. Pisani D
    6. Peterson KJ

    (2011) The Cambrian conundrum: early divergence and later ecological success in the early history of animals

    Science 334:1091–1097.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1206375

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
28. Book

    1. Fain GL

    (2003)

    Sensory Transduction

    Sunderland: Sinauer Associates, Inc.

    • Google Scholar
29. Book

    1. Fautin DG
    2. Mariscal RN

    (1991)

    Cnidaria: Anthozoa

    In: Harrison FW, editors. Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates, Vol. 2. New York: Wiley-Liss. pp. 267–358.

    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Finney M
    2. Ruvkun G

    (1990) The unc-86 gene product couples cell lineage and cell identity in C. elegans

    Cell 63:895–905.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(90)90493-x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Fornes O
    2. Castro-Mondragon JA
    3. Khan A
    4. van der Lee R
    5. Zhang X
    6. Richmond PA
    7. Modi BP
    8. Correard S
    9. Gheorghe M
    10. Baranašić D
    11. Santana-Garcia W
    12. Tan G
    13. Chèneby J
    14. Ballester B
    15. Parcy F
    16. Sandelin A
    17. Lenhard B
    18. Wasserman WW
    19. Mathelier A

    (2020) JASPAR 2020: update of the open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles

    Nucleic Acids Research 48:D87–D92.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz1001

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
32. Data

    1. Fredman D
    2. Schwaiger M
    3. Rentzsch F
    4. Technau U

    (authors) (2013) Nematostella vectensis Transcriptome and Gene Models v2.0

    figshare.

    https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.807696.v2
33. 1. Fritzenwanker JH
    2. Technau U

    (2002) Induction of gametogenesis in the basal cnidarian Nematostella vectensis (Anthozoa)

    Development Genes and Evolution 212:99–103.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00427-002-0214-7

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Fritzenwanker JH
    2. Genikhovich G
    3. Kraus Y
    4. Technau U

    (2007) Early development and axis specification in the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis

    Developmental Biology 310:264–279.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.07.029

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Gan L
    2. Xiang M
    3. Zhou L
    4. Wagner DS
    5. Klein WH
    6. Nathans J

    (1996) POU domain factor Brn-3b is required for the development of a large set of retinal ganglion cells

    PNAS 93:3920–3925.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.9.3920

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Gold DA
    2. Gates RD
    3. Jacobs DK

    (2014) The early expansion and evolutionary dynamics of POU class genes

    Molecular Biology and Evolution 31:3136–3147.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu243

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Grieben M
    2. Pike ACW
    3. Shintre CA
    4. Venturi E
    5. El-Ajouz S
    6. Tessitore A
    7. Shrestha L
    8. Mukhopadhyay S
    9. Mahajan P
    10. Chalk R
    11. Burgess-Brown NA
    12. Sitsapesan R
    13. Huiskonen JT
    14. Carpenter EP

    (2017) Structure of the polycystic kidney disease TRP channel Polycystin-2 (PC2)

    Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 24:114–122.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.3343

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Gruber CA
    2. Rhee JM
    3. Gleiberman A
    4. Turner EE

    (1997) POU domain factors of the Brn-3 class recognize functional DNA elements which are distinctive, symmetrical, and highly conserved in evolution

    Molecular and Cellular Biology 17:2391–2400.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.17.5.2391

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Guindon S
    2. Gascuel O

    (2003) A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood

    Systematic Biology 52:696–704.

    https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150390235520

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Gupta S
    2. Stamatoyannopoulos JA
    3. Bailey TL
    4. Noble WS

    (2007) Quantifying similarity between motifs

    Genome Biology 8:R24.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2007-8-2-r24

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Gyoja F
    2. Kawashima T
    3. Satoh N

    (2012) A genomewide survey of bHLH transcription factors in the coral Acropora digitifera identifies three novel orthologous families, pearl, amber, and peridot

    Development Genes and Evolution 222:63–76.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00427-012-0388-6

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Hand C
    2. Uhlinger KR

    (1992) The Culture, Sexual and Asexual Reproduction, and Growth of the Sea Anemone Nematostella vectensis

    The Biological Bulletin 182:169–176.

    https://doi.org/10.2307/1542110

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
43. 1. Havrilak JA
    2. Al-Shaer L
    3. Baban N
    4. Akinci N
    5. Layden MJ

    (2021) Characterization of the dynamics and variability of neuronal subtype responses during growth, degrowth, and regeneration of Nematostella vectensis

    BMC Biology 19:104.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-021-01038-9

    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Hejnol A
    2. Obst M
    3. Stamatakis A
    4. Ott M
    5. Rouse GW
    6. Edgecombe GD
    7. Martinez P
    8. Baguñà J
    9. Bailly X
    10. Jondelius U
    11. Wiens M
    12. Müller WEG
    13. Seaver E
    14. Wheeler WC
    15. Martindale MQ
    16. Giribet G
    17. Dunn CW

    (2009) Assessing the root of bilaterian animals with scalable phylogenomic methods

    Proceedings of the Royal Society B 276:4261–4270.

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.0896

    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Herr W
    2. Cleary MA

    (1995) The POU domain: versatility in transcriptional regulation by a flexible two-in-one DNA-binding domain

    Genes & Development 9:1679–1693.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.9.14.1679

    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Holland LZ

    (2005) Non-neural ectoderm is really neural: evolution of developmental patterning mechanisms in the non-neural ectoderm of chordates and the problem of sensory cell homologies

    Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B 304B:304–323.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.21038

    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Holtmann M
    2. Thurm U

    (2001) Variations of concentric hair cells in a Cnidarian sensory epithelium (Coryne tubulosa)

    The Journal of Comparative Neurology 432:550–563.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.1119

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Horridge GA

    (1969) Statocysts of medusae and evolution of stereocilia

    Tissue and Cell 1:341–353.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-8166(69)80029-7

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Hroudova M
    2. Vojta P
    3. Strnad H
    4. Krejcik Z
    5. Ridl J
    6. Paces J
    7. Vlcek C
    8. Paces V
    9. Labrador JP

    (2012) Diversity, Phylogeny and Expression Patterns of Pou and Six Homeodomain Transcription Factors in Hydrozoan Jellyfish Craspedacusta sowerbyi

    PLOS ONE 7:e36420.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036420

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
50. 1. Hündgen M
    2. Biela C

    (1982) Fine structure of touch-plates in the scyphomedusan Aurelia aurita

    Journal of Ultrastructure Research 80:178–184.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5320(82)90016-8

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Ikeda R
    2. Pak K
    3. Chavez E
    4. Ryan AF

    (2015) Transcription factors with conserved binding sites near ATOH1 on the POU4F3 gene enhance the induction of cochlear hair cells

    Molecular Neurobiology 51:672–684.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-014-8801-y

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Ikmi A
    2. McKinney SA
    3. Delventhal KM
    4. Gibson MC

    (2014) TALEN and CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing in the early-branching metazoan Nematostella vectensis

    Nature Communications 5:5486.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6486

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
53. 1. Jalili V
    2. Matteucci M
    3. Masseroli M
    4. Morelli MJ

    (2015) Using combined evidence from replicates to evaluate ChIP-seq peaks

    Bioinformatics 31:2761–2769.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv293

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
54. 1. Jarman AP

    (2002) Studies of mechanosensation using the fly

    Human Molecular Genetics 11:1215–1218.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/11.10.1215

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
55. Book

    1. Jørgensen JM

    (1989)

    Evolution of Octavolateralis Sensory Cells

    In: Coombs S, Gorner P, Munz H, editors. The Mechanosensory Lateral Line: Neurobiology and Evolution. New York: Springer-Verlag. pp. 115–145.

    • Google Scholar
56. 1. Kelley LA
    2. Mezulis S
    3. Yates CM
    4. Wass MN
    5. Sternberg MJE

    (2015) The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis

    Nature Protocols 10:845–858.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2015.053

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
57. 1. Kitajiri S
    2. Sakamoto T
    3. Belyantseva IA
    4. Goodyear RJ
    5. Stepanyan R
    6. Fujiwara I
    7. Bird JE
    8. Riazuddin S
    9. Riazuddin S
    10. Ahmed ZM
    11. Hinshaw JE
    12. Sellers J
    13. Bartles JR
    14. Hammer JA
    15. Richardson GP
    16. Griffith AJ
    17. Frolenkov GI
    18. Friedman TB

    (2010) Actin-bundling protein TRIOBP forms resilient rootlets of hair cell stereocilia essential for hearing

    Cell 141:786–798.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.049

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
58. 1. Kraus Y
    2. Technau U

    (2006) Gastrulation in the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis occurs by invagination and immigration: an ultrastructural study

    Development Genes and Evolution 216:119–132.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00427-005-0038-3

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
59. 1. Landt SG
    2. Marinov GK
    3. Kundaje A
    4. Kheradpour P
    5. Pauli F
    6. Batzoglou S
    7. Bernstein BE
    8. Bickel P
    9. Brown JB
    10. Cayting P
    11. Chen Y
    12. DeSalvo G
    13. Epstein C
    14. Fisher-Aylor KI
    15. Euskirchen G
    16. Gerstein M
    17. Gertz J
    18. Hartemink AJ
    19. Hoffman MM
    20. Iyer VR
    21. Jung YL
    22. Karmakar S
    23. Kellis M
    24. Kharchenko PV
    25. Li Q
    26. Liu T
    27. Liu XS
    28. Ma L
    29. Milosavljevic A
    30. Myers RM
    31. Park PJ
    32. Pazin MJ
    33. Perry MD
    34. Raha D
    35. Reddy TE
    36. Rozowsky J
    37. Shoresh N
    38. Sidow A
    39. Slattery M
    40. Stamatoyannopoulos JA
    41. Tolstorukov MY
    42. White KP
    43. Xi S
    44. Farnham PJ
    45. Lieb JD
    46. Wold BJ
    47. Snyder M

    (2012) ChIP-seq guidelines and practices of the ENCODE and modENCODE consortia

    Genome Research 22:1813–1831.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.136184.111

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
60. 1. Lee PN
    2. Kumburegama S
    3. Marlow HQ
    4. Martindale MQ
    5. Wikramanayake AH

    (2007) Asymmetric developmental potential along the animal-vegetal axis in the anthozoan cnidarian, Nematostella vectensis, is mediated by Dishevelled

    Developmental Biology 310:169–186.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.05.040

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
61. Book

    1. Lesh-Laurie GE
    2. Suchy PE

    (1991)

    Cnidaria: Scyphozoa and Cubozoa

    In: Harrison FW, editors. Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates, Vol. 2. New York: Wiley-Liss. pp. 185–266.

    • Google Scholar
62. 1. Leyva-Díaz E
    2. Masoudi N
    3. Serrano-Saiz E
    4. Glenwinkel L
    5. Hobert O

    (2020) Brn3/POU-IV-type POU homeobox genes-Paradigmatic regulators of neuronal identity across phylogeny

    Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Developmental Biology 9:e374.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/wdev.374

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
63. 1. Li C
    2. Wen A
    3. Shen B
    4. Lu J
    5. Huang Y
    6. Chang Y

    (2011) FastCloning: a highly simplified, purification-free, sequence- and ligation-independent PCR cloning method

    BMC Biotechnology 11:92.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-11-92

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
64. 1. Liu W
    2. Mo Z
    3. Xiang M

    (2001) The Ath5 proneural genes function upstream of Brn3 POU domain transcription factor genes to promote retinal ganglion cell development

    PNAS 98:1649–1654.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.4.1649

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
65. Software

    1. Loeza PYR

    (2022) POU-IV_analysis, version swh:1:rev:463178242d112edab7094c12e093dd780177885b

    Software Heritage.

    https://archive.softwareheritage.org/swh:1:dir:628c2c4ada964d41067b1bbbd03655394eff51f9;origin=https://github.com/pyrosilesl97/POU-IV_analysis;visit=swh:1:snp:8bb7c3e8ef4d02b0abdcf8f68ffa32f50e3db2d1;anchor=swh:1:rev:463178242d112edab7094c12e093dd780177885b
66. 1. López-Escardó D
    2. Grau-Bové X
    3. Guillaumet-Adkins A
    4. Gut M
    5. Sieracki ME
    6. Ruiz-Trillo I

    (2019) Reconstruction of protein domain evolution using single-cell amplified genomes of uncultured choanoflagellates sheds light on the origin of animals

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 374:20190088.

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0088

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
67. 1. Love MI
    2. Huber W
    3. Anders S

    (2014) Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2

    Genome Biology 15:550.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8

    • Google Scholar
68. 1. Lyons KM

    (1973) Collar cells in planula and adult tentacle ectoderm of the solitary coral Balanophyllia regia (Anthozoa Eupsammiidae)

    Zeitschrift Fur Zellforschung Und Mikroskopische Anatomie 145:57–74.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00307189

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
69. 1. Magie CR
    2. Daly M
    3. Martindale MQ

    (2007) Gastrulation in the cnidarian Nematostella vectensis occurs via invagination not ingression

    Developmental Biology 305:483–497.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.02.044

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
70. 1. Mahoney JL
    2. Graugnard EM
    3. Mire P
    4. Watson GM

    (2011) Evidence for involvement of TRPA1 in the detection of vibrations by hair bundle mechanoreceptors in sea anemones

    Journal of Comparative Physiology. A, Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology 197:729–742.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-011-0636-7

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
71. Book

    1. Manley GA
    2. Ladher R

    (2008) 3.01 - Phylogeny and Evolution of Ciliated Mechanoreceptor Cells

    In: Masland RH, Albright TD, Albright TD, Masland RH, Dallos P, Oertel D, Firestein S, Beauchamp GK, Catherine Bushnell M, Basbaum AI, Kaas JH, Gardner EP, editors. The Senses: A Comprehensive Reference. New York: Academic Press. pp. 1–24.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012370880-9.00002-5

    • Google Scholar
72. 1. Martindale MQ
    2. Pang K
    3. Finnerty JR

    (2004) Investigating the origins of triploblasty: “mesodermal” gene expression in a diploblastic animal, the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis (phylum, Cnidaria; class, Anthozoa)

    Development 131:2463–2474.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.01119

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
73. 1. Masuda M
    2. Dulon D
    3. Pak K
    4. Mullen LM
    5. Li Y
    6. Erkman L
    7. Ryan AF

    (2011) Regulation of POU4F3 gene expression in hair cells by 5’ DNA in mice

    Neuroscience 197:48–64.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.09.033

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
74. 1. McEvilly RJ
    2. Erkman L
    3. Luo L
    4. Sawchenko PE
    5. Ryan AF
    6. Rosenfeld MG

    (1996) Requirement for Brn-3.0 in differentiation and survival of sensory and motor neurons

    Nature 384:574–577.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/384574a0

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
75. 1. Medina M
    2. Collins AG
    3. Silberman JD
    4. Sogin ML

    (2001) Evaluating hypotheses of basal animal phylogeny using complete sequences of large and small subunit rRNA

    PNAS 98:9707–9712.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.171316998

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
76. 1. Mire P
    2. Watson GM

    (1997) Mechanotransduction of hair bundles arising from multicellular complexes in anemones

    Hearing Research 113:224–234.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-5955(97)00145-7

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
77. 1. Mire-Thibodeaux P
    2. Watson GM

    (1994) Morphodynamic hair bundles arising from sensory cell/supporting cell complexes frequency-tune nematocyst discharge in sea anemones

    The Journal of Experimental Zoology 268:282–292.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1402680404

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
78. 1. Mochizuki T
    2. Wu G
    3. Hayashi T
    4. Xenophontos SL
    5. Veldhuisen B
    6. Saris JJ
    7. Reynolds DM
    8. Cai Y
    9. Gabow PA
    10. Pierides A
    11. Kimberling WJ
    12. Breuning MH
    13. Deltas CC
    14. Peters DJ
    15. Somlo S

    (1996) PKD2, a gene for polycystic kidney disease that encodes an integral membrane protein

    Science 272:1339–1342.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.272.5266.1339

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
79. 1. Moy GW
    2. Mendoza LM
    3. Schulz JR
    4. Swanson WJ
    5. Glabe CG
    6. Vacquier VD

    (1996) The sea urchin sperm receptor for egg jelly is a modular protein with extensive homology to the human polycystic kidney disease protein, PKD1

    The Journal of Cell Biology 133:809–817.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.133.4.809

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
80. 1. Nakanishi N
    2. Yuan D
    3. Hartenstein V
    4. Jacobs DK

    (2010) Evolutionary origin of rhopalia: insights from cellular-level analyses of Otx and POU expression patterns in the developing rhopalial nervous system

    Evolution & Development 12:404–415.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-142X.2010.00427.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
81. 1. Nakanishi N
    2. Renfer E
    3. Technau U
    4. Rentzsch F

    (2012) Nervous systems of the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis are generated by ectoderm and endoderm and shaped by distinct mechanisms

    Development 139:347–357.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.071902

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
82. 1. Nakanishi N
    2. Martindale MQ

    (2018) CRISPR knockouts reveal an endogenous role for ancient neuropeptides in regulating developmental timing in a sea anemone

    eLife 7:e39742.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.39742

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
83. Book

    1. Oliver D
    2. Thurm U

    (1996)

    Mechanoreception by concentric hair cells of hydropolyps

    In: Elsner N, Schnitzler HU, editors. Gottingen Neurobiology Report. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme. pp. 1–2.

    • Google Scholar
84. 1. Putnam NH
    2. Srivastava M
    3. Hellsten U
    4. Dirks B
    5. Chapman J
    6. Salamov A
    7. Terry A
    8. Shapiro H
    9. Lindquist E
    10. Kapitonov VV
    11. Jurka J
    12. Genikhovich G
    13. Grigoriev IV
    14. Lucas SM
    15. Steele RE
    16. Finnerty JR
    17. Technau U
    18. Martindale MQ
    19. Rokhsar DS

    (2007) Sea anemone genome reveals ancestral eumetazoan gene repertoire and genomic organization

    Science 317:86–94.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1139158

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
85. 1. Renfer E
    2. Amon-Hassenzahl A
    3. Steinmetz PRH
    4. Technau U

    (2010) A muscle-specific transgenic reporter line of the sea anemone, Nematostella vectensis

    PNAS 107:104–108.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0909148107

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
86. 1. Richards GS
    2. Rentzsch F

    (2014) Transgenic analysis of a SoxB gene reveals neural progenitor cells in the cnidarian Nematostella vectensis

    Development 141:4681–4689.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.112029

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
87. 1. Richards GS
    2. Rentzsch F

    (2015) Regulation of Nematostella neural progenitors by SoxB, Notch and bHLH genes

    Development 142:3332–3342.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.123745

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
88. 1. Sandford R
    2. Sgotto B
    3. Aparicio S
    4. Brenner S
    5. Vaudin M
    6. Wilson RK
    7. Chissoe S
    8. Pepin K
    9. Bateman A
    10. Chothia C
    11. Hughes J
    12. Harris P

    (1997) Comparative analysis of the polycystic kidney disease 1 (PKD1) gene reveals an integral membrane glycoprotein with multiple evolutionary conserved domains

    Human Molecular Genetics 6:1483–1489.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/6.9.1483

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
89. Book

    1. Schlosser G

    (2020) 2.17 - Evolution of Hair Cells

    In: Fritzsch B, editors. The Senses: A Comprehensive Reference (Second Edition). Oxford: Elsevier. pp. 302–336.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.24136-9

    • Google Scholar
90. 1. Sebé-Pedrós A
    2. Saudemont B
    3. Chomsky E
    4. Plessier F
    5. Mailhé M-P
    6. Renno J
    7. Loe-Mie Y
    8. Lifshitz A
    9. Mukamel Z
    10. Schmutz S
    11. Novault S
    12. Steinmetz PRH
    13. Spitz F
    14. Tanay A
    15. Marlow H

    (2018) Cnidarian Cell Type Diversity and Regulation Revealed by Whole-Organism Single-Cell RNA-Seq

    Cell 173:1520–1534.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.019

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
91. 1. Serrano-Saiz E
    2. Leyva-Díaz E
    3. De La Cruz E
    4. Hobert O

    (2018) BRN3-type POU Homeobox Genes Maintain the Identity of Mature Postmitotic Neurons in Nematodes and Mice

    Current Biology 28:2813–2823.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.045

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
92. 1. Silva MAP
    2. Nakanishi N

    (2019) Genotyping of Sea Anemone during Early Development

    Journal of Visualized Experiments 147:59541.

    https://doi.org/10.3791/59541

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
93. 1. Simionato E
    2. Ledent V
    3. Richards G
    4. Thomas-Chollier M
    5. Kerner P
    6. Coornaert D
    7. Degnan BM
    8. Vervoort M

    (2007) Origin and diversification of the basic helix-loop-helix gene family in metazoans: insights from comparative genomics

    BMC Evolutionary Biology 7:33.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-7-33

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
94. 1. Singla CL

    (1975) Staocysts of hydromedusae

    Cell and Tissue Research 158:391–407.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223835

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
95. 1. Singla CL

    (1983) Fine structure of the sensory receptors of Aglantha digitale (Hydromedusae: Trachylina)

    Cell and Tissue Research 231:415–425.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00222191

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
96. 1. Sock E
    2. Enderich J
    3. Rosenfeld MG
    4. Wegner M

    (1996) Identification of the nuclear localization signal of the POU domain protein Tst-1/Oct6

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 271:17512–17518.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.271.29.17512

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
97. 1. Solé M
    2. Lenoir M
    3. Fortuño JM
    4. Durfort M
    5. van der Schaar M
    6. André M

    (2016) Evidence of Cnidarians sensitivity to sound after exposure to low frequency underwater sources

    Scientific Reports 6:37979.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/srep37979

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
98. 1. Steigelman KA
    2. Lelli A
    3. Wu X
    4. Gao J
    5. Lin S
    6. Piontek K
    7. Wodarczyk C
    8. Boletta A
    9. Kim H
    10. Qian F
    11. Germino G
    12. Géléoc GSG
    13. Holt JR
    14. Zuo J

    (2011) Polycystin-1 is required for stereocilia structure but not for mechanotransduction in inner ear hair cells

    The Journal of Neuroscience 31:12241–12250.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6531-10.2011

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
99. 1. Szczepanek S
    2. Cikala M
    3. David CN

    (2002)

    Poly-gamma-glutamate synthesis during formation of nematocyst capsules in Hydra

    Journal of Cell Science 115:745–751.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
100. 1. Tardent P
     2. Schmid V

     (1972) Ultrastructure of mechanoreceptors of the polyp coryne pintneri (Hydrozoa, Athecata)

     Experimental Cell Research 72:265–275.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4827(72)90589-7

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
101. Book

     1. Thomas M
     2. Edwards N

     (1991)

     Cnidaria: Hydrozoa

     In: Harrison FW, editors. Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates, Vol. 2. New York: Wiley-Liss. pp. 91–183.

     • Google Scholar
102. 1. Thomas-Chollier M
     2. Herrmann C
     3. Defrance M
     4. Sand O
     5. Thieffry D
     6. van Helden J

     (2012) RSAT peak-motifs: motif analysis in full-size ChIP-seq datasets

     Nucleic Acids Research 40:e31.

     https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr1104

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
103. 1. Tournière O
     2. Dolan D
     3. Richards GS
     4. Sunagar K
     5. Columbus-Shenkar YY
     6. Moran Y
     7. Rentzsch F

     (2020) NvPOU4/Brain3 Functions as a Terminal Selector Gene in the Nervous System of the Cnidarian Nematostella vectensis

     Cell Reports 30:4473–4489.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2020.03.031

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
104. 1. Vahava O
     2. Morell R
     3. Lynch ED
     4. Weiss S
     5. Kagan ME
     6. Ahituv N
     7. Morrow JE
     8. Lee MK
     9. Skvorak AB
     10. Morton CC
     11. Blumenfeld A
     12. Frydman M
     13. Friedman TB
     14. King MC
     15. Avraham KB

     (1998) Mutation in transcription factor POU4F3 associated with inherited progressive hearing loss in humans

     Science 279:1950–1954.

     https://doi.org/10.1126/science.279.5358.1950

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
105. 1. Watson GM
     2. Roberts J

     (1995) Chemoreceptor-mediated polymerization and depolymerization of actin in hair bundles of sea anemones

     Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton 30:208–220.

     https://doi.org/10.1002/cm.970300305

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
106. 1. Watson GM
     2. Mire P
     3. Hudson RR

     (1997) Hair bundles of sea anemones as a model system for vertebrate hair bundles

     Hearing Research 107:53–66.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-5955(97)00022-1

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
107. 1. Watson GM
     2. Pham L
     3. Graugnard EM
     4. Mire P

     (2008) Cadherin 23-like polypeptide in hair bundle mechanoreceptors of sea anemones

     Journal of Comparative Physiology A 194:811–820.

     https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-008-0352-0

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
108. 1. Watson GM
     2. Mire P
     3. Kinler KM

     (2009) Mechanosensitivity in the model sea anemone Nematostella vectensis

     Marine Biology 156:2129–2137.

     https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-009-1243-9

     • Google Scholar
109. 1. Westfall JA

     (2004) Neural pathways and innervation of cnidocytes in tentacles of sea anemones

     Hydrobiologia 530–531:117–121.

     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-004-2678-0

     • Google Scholar
110. 1. Whelan S
     2. Goldman N

     (2001) A general empirical model of protein evolution derived from multiple protein families using a maximum-likelihood approach

     Molecular Biology and Evolution 18:691–699.

     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003851

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
111. 1. Wolenski FS
     2. Bradham CA
     3. Finnerty JR
     4. Gilmore TD

     (2013) NF-κB is required for cnidocyte development in the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis

     Developmental Biology 373:205–215.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2012.10.004

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
112. 1. Xiang M
     2. Gan L
     3. Zhou L
     4. Klein WH
     5. Nathans J

     (1996) Targeted deletion of the mouse POU domain gene Brn-3a causes selective loss of neurons in the brainstem and trigeminal ganglion, uncoordinated limb movement, and impaired suckling

     PNAS 93:11950–11955.

     https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.21.11950

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
113. 1. Xiang M
     2. Gan L
     3. Li D
     4. Chen ZY
     5. Zhou L
     6. O’Malley BW
     7. Klein W
     8. Nathans J

     (1997a) Essential role of POU-domain factor Brn-3c in auditory and vestibular hair cell development

     PNAS 94:9445–9450.

     https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.17.9445

     • Google Scholar
114. 1. Xiang M
     2. Gan L
     3. Li D
     4. Zhou L
     5. Chen ZY
     6. Wagner D
     7. O’Malley BW
     8. Klein W
     9. Nathans J

     (1997b) Role of the Brn-3 family of POU-domain genes in the development of the auditory/vestibular, somatosensory, and visual systems

     Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 62:325–336.

     https://doi.org/10.1101/sqb.1997.062.01.039

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
115. 1. Xiang M
     2. Gao WQ
     3. Hasson T
     4. Shin JJ

     (1998) Requirement for Brn-3c in maturation and survival, but not in fate determination of inner ear hair cells

     Development 125:3935–3946.

     https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.125.20.3935

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
116. 1. Yu HV
     2. Tao L
     3. Llamas J
     4. Wang X
     5. Nguyen JD
     6. Trecek T
     7. Segil N

     (2021) POU4F3 pioneer activity enables ATOH1 to drive diverse mechanoreceptor differentiation through a feed-forward epigenetic mechanism

     PNAS 118:e2105137118.

     https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2105137118

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
117. 1. Zapata F
     2. Goetz FE
     3. Smith SA
     4. Howison M
     5. Siebert S
     6. Church SH
     7. Sanders SM
     8. Ames CL
     9. McFadden CS
     10. France SC
     11. Daly M
     12. Collins AG
     13. Haddock SHD
     14. Dunn CW
     15. Cartwright P

     (2015) Phylogenomic Analyses Support Traditional Relationships within Cnidaria

     PLOS ONE 10:e0139068.

     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139068

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
118. 1. Zenkert C
     2. Takahashi T
     3. Diesner M-O
     4. Özbek S

     (2011) Morphological and molecular analysis of the Nematostella vectensis cnidom

     PLOS ONE 6:e22725.

     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022725

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
119. 1. Zhang Y
     2. Liu T
     3. Meyer CA
     4. Eeckhoute J
     5. Johnson DS
     6. Bernstein BE
     7. Nusbaum C
     8. Myers RM
     9. Brown M
     10. Li W
     11. Liu XS

     (2008) Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS)

     Genome Biology 9:R137.

     https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
120. 1. Zhu A
     2. Ibrahim JG
     3. Love MI

     (2019) Heavy-tailed prior distributions for sequence count data: removing the noise and preserving large differences

     Bioinformatics 35:2084–2092.

     https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty895

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Ethan Ozment

   Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, United States

   Contribution

   Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

2. Arianna N Tamvacakis

   Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, United States

   Contribution

   Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing - original draft

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

3. Jianhong Zhou

   Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, United States

   Contribution

   Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing - original draft

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

4. Pablo Yamild Rosiles-Loeza

   Unidad de Genómica Avanzada (Langebio), Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del IPN, Irapuato, Mexico

   Contribution

   Formal analysis, Investigation, Software, Visualization, Writing - original draft

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4569-9076

5. Esteban Elías Escobar-Hernandez

   Unidad de Genómica Avanzada (Langebio), Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del IPN, Irapuato, Mexico

   Contribution

   Formal analysis, Investigation, Software

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8892-5141

6. Selene L Fernandez-Valverde

   Unidad de Genómica Avanzada (Langebio), Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del IPN, Irapuato, Mexico

   Contribution

   Data curation, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Writing - review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

7. Nagayasu Nakanishi

   Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, United States

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Writing - review and editing

   For correspondence

   nnakanis@uark.edu

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7516-5078

• 2,844

  views

• 391

  downloads

• 12

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.