Cell Signaling: The many states of STIM1
Over the past decades, the humble calcium ion has emerged as a crucial intracellular messenger that participates in an impressively diverse array of biological processes, from fertilization to programmed cell death. It plays a key role in cells across the body, helping to activate the immune system, release neurotransmitters, and trigger muscle contractions. Imbalances in the concentration of calcium inside a cell leads to chaotic responses and, in some cases, to diseases that can sometimes be fatal (Feske et al., 2006; Lacruz and Feske, 2015; Morin et al., 2020).
The flow of calcium ions into cells is therefore tightly regulated, including by a system known as SOCE (short for store operated calcium entry), which has recently been gaining attention (Prakriya and Lewis, 2015). When calcium levels drop inside an intracellular storage compartment called the endoplasmic reticulum, SOCE increases the intake of calcium ions across the plasma membrane that separates the cell from its environment. The system relies on two proteins: Orai, a calcium-selective channel studded through the plasma membrane; and the stromal interaction molecule (STIM1), located in the membrane surrounding the endoplasmic reticulum (Prakriya and Lewis, 2015). STIM1 can sense the levels of calcium inside the reticulum and activate Orai when these get low. For precisely the right amount of calcium to be ushered into the cell, STIM1 and Orai must be tightly regulated. Now, in eLife, Richard Lewis and colleagues based at Stanford University School of Medicine – including Stijn van Dorp as first author – report impressive insights into the conformations and dynamics of STIM1 (van Dorp et al., 2021).
In its resting state, STIM1 forms a dimer that binds to calcium ions present in high concentrations inside the reticulum and adopts a tightly packed conformation (Figure 1A, left). One tail of the STIM1 protein features three large ‘coiled-coil’ domains (CC1, 2 and 3), which are stabilized in the resting, tight state via a specific type of ‘coiled-coil’ interaction (Fahrner et al., 2020). Extracellular signals such as growth factors, hormones or foreign molecules can trigger calcium-dependent signaling pathways and therefore deplete reticulum calcium reserves. As a result (Zhou et al., 2013), STIM1 loses the ions it is bound to, and undergoes a series of conformational changes that culminate in its cytoplasmic portion (which is in contact with the inside of the cell) being extended, and increasing in length (Figure 1A, right). This elongated STIM1 stretches to the edge of the cell, reaching junctions that bring together the plasma membrane and the reticulum. Once there, it encounters and couples to Orai, triggering the channel to open and allow calcium ions to enter the cell (Prakriya and Lewis, 2015).
The CC2 and CC3 domains of STIM1, called CAD (or SOAR), form the Orai-activating region, the structure of which has been examined in dimeric form using X-ray crystallography (Park et al., 2009; Yang et al., 2012; Yuan et al., 2009); yet many aspects remain unknown about how STIM1 can switch between a resting and activated state, how it can activate Orai, and in particular how CC1 interacts with CAD to regulate the activity of this calcium sensor. To shed light on these dynamics, the team harnessed single-molecule FRET microscopy (smFRET), a biophysical technique that allows scientists to measure distances between amino acids using fluorescent compounds; this approach was applied to the C-terminus of STIM1. The resulting data fit well with the previously reported CAD crystal structure, while adding details on the orientation of the domain, in particular its Orai binding region (Baraniak et al., 2020).
Consistent with a recent report, the data suggests that CAD sequesters the Orai binding region near the reticulum membrane (Figure 1A, left; 1B, top; Höglinger et al., 2021). The experiments showed that the coiled-coil domains CC1 and CC3, located on the cytoplasmic side of the reticulum membrane, interact to create an inhibitory clamp that stabilizes STIM1 in its compact, resting state (Figure 1A, left). Previously, an intramolecular, ‘cis’ CC1/ CC3 interaction had been assumed (Fahrner et al., 2014; Ma et al., 2015), but the smFRET data suggested both a switching intermolecular, ‘trans’ as well as intramolecular, ‘cis’ interaction within a STIM1 dimer (Figure 1B, top).
Furthermore, van Dorp et al. focused on the CC1 domain and its three CC1α1, α2 and α3 subregions, confirming the findings of previous studies (Fahrner et al., 2014). Another group used nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to examine both the whole CC1 domain, and how its subregions interact to affect STIM1 activation (Rathner et al., 2021). The structure identified in this study, however, was not observed by van Dorp et al., who suggest it is an intermediate state following STIM1 activation (Figure 1A, middle). Experiments artificially linking together nearby amino acids gave additional structural information about the CC1 subdomains, showing that activated STIM1 appears to shift to a fully elongated conformation to couple to Orai (Figure 1A, right).
Further insights into STIM1 structures were then provided in a disease context, as van Dorp et al. imaged a mutated version of STIM1 associated with a rare condition known as Stormorken syndrome (Morin et al., 2020). The smFRET approach revealed that this change had substantial impact on the conformation of STIM1 (Figure 1B, bottom). In particular, it destabilized the resting, tight state of STIM1 C-terminus by releasing the inhibitory clamp between CC1 and CC3 (Figure 1B).
Without high-resolution structural information, smFRET is an excellent method to grasp the configuration and dynamic of proteins – as long as, of course, the fluorescent molecules required for the technique do not disturb these interactions. Applying this method to a whole STIM1 protein reconstituted into a lipid vesicle would further improve the approach, allowing researchers to assess STIM1 conformational changes under more physiological conditions. How the protein rearranges itself when calcium levels drop in the reticulum could be visualized on both sides of the membrane of this compartment. Orai domains (or even the full channel) could be reconstituted in other vesicles, and then used to probe the interaction between STIM1 and Orai. A finer understanding of the conformational changes of STIM1 as it couples to Orai will shed light on how calcium levels are regulated in both healthy and diseased cells.
References
-
The intricate coupling between STIM proteins and Orai channelsCurrent Opinion in Physiology 17:106–114.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cophys.2020.07.018
-
A coiled-coil clamp controls both conformation and clustering of stromal interaction molecule 1 (STIM1)The Journal of Biological Chemistry 289:33231–33244.https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M114.610022
-
Mechanism of STIM activationCurrent Opinion in Physiology 17:74–79.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cophys.2020.07.006
-
Defects in the STIM1 SOARα2 domain affect multiple steps in the CRAC channel activation cascadeCellular and Molecular Life Sciences 78:6645–6667.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-021-03933-4
-
Diseases caused by mutations in ORAI1 and STIM1Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1356:45–79.https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12938
-
Inside-out Ca(2+) signalling prompted by STIM1 conformational switchNature Communications 6:7826.https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8826
-
Store-operated calcium channelsPhysiological Reviews 95:1383–1436.https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00020.2014
-
Interhelical interactions within the STIM1 CC1 domain modulate CRAC channel activationNature Chemical Biology 17:196–204.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-020-00672-8
-
SOAR and the polybasic STIM1 domains gate and regulate Orai channelsNature Cell Biology 11:337–343.https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1842
-
Initial activation of STIM1, the regulator of store-operated calcium entryNature Structural & Molecular Biology 20:973–981.https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2625
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2021, Fahrner and Romanin
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 1,200
- views
-
- 136
- downloads
-
- 1
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) is a nuclear receptor transcription factor that regulates gene expression programs in response to ligand binding. Endogenous and synthetic ligands, including covalent antagonist inhibitors GW9662 and T0070907, are thought to compete for the orthosteric pocket in the ligand-binding domain (LBD). However, we previously showed that synthetic PPARγ ligands can cooperatively cobind with and reposition a bound endogenous orthosteric ligand to an alternate site, synergistically regulating PPARγ structure and function (Shang et al., 2018). Here, we reveal the structural mechanism of cobinding between a synthetic covalent antagonist inhibitor with other synthetic ligands. Biochemical and NMR data show that covalent inhibitors weaken—but do not prevent—the binding of other ligands via an allosteric mechanism, rather than direct ligand clashing, by shifting the LBD ensemble toward a transcriptionally repressive conformation, which structurally clashes with orthosteric ligand binding. Crystal structures reveal different cobinding mechanisms including alternate site binding to unexpectedly adopting an orthosteric binding mode by altering the covalent inhibitor binding pose. Our findings highlight the significant flexibility of the PPARγ orthosteric pocket, its ability to accommodate multiple ligands, and demonstrate that GW9662 and T0070907 should not be used as chemical tools to inhibit ligand binding to PPARγ.
-
- Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
- Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
Dynamic conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes play a central and ubiquitous role in the regulation of protein function, yet it is very challenging to study these changes, especially for large protein complexes, under physiological conditions. Here, we introduce a novel isobaric crosslinker, Qlinker, for studying conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes using quantitative crosslinking mass spectrometry. Qlinkers are small and simple, amine-reactive molecules with an optimal extended distance of ~10 Å, which use MS2 reporter ions for relative quantification of Qlinker-modified peptides derived from different samples. We synthesized the 2-plex Q2linker and showed that the Q2linker can provide quantitative crosslinking data that pinpoints key conformational and structural changes in biosensors, binary and ternary complexes composed of the general transcription factors TBP, TFIIA, and TFIIB, and RNA polymerase II complexes.