Abstract

Mechanobiology requires precise quantitative information on processes taking place in specific 3D microenvironments. Connecting the abundance of microscopical, molecular, biochemical and cell mechanical data with defined topologies has turned out to be extremely difficult. Establishing such structural and functional 3D maps needed for biophysical modeling is a particular challenge for the cytoskeleton, which consists of long and interwoven filamentous polymers coordinating subcellular processes and interactions of cells with their environment. To date, useful tools are available for the segmentation and modeling of actin filaments and microtubules but comprehensive tools for the mapping of intermediate filament organization are still lacking. In this work, we describe a workflow to model and examine the complete 3D arrangement of the keratin intermediate filament cytoskeleton in canine, murine and human epithelial cells both, in vitro and in vivo. Numerical models are derived from confocal Airyscan high resolution 3D imaging of fluorescence-tagged keratin filaments. They are interrogated and annotated at different length scales using different modes of visualization including immersive virtual reality. In this way, information is provided on network organization at the subcellular level including mesh arrangement, density and isotropic configuration as well as details on filament morphology such as bundling, curvature and orientation. We show that the comparison of these parameters helps to identify, in quantitative terms, similarities and differences of keratin network organization in epithelial cell types defining subcellular domains, notably basal, apical, lateral and perinuclear systems. The described approach and the presented data are pivotal for generating mechanobiological models that can be experimentally tested.

Data availability

Software, original and processed data are available athttp://kernet.rwth-aachen.de/andhttps://github.com/VRGroupRWTH/Zytoskelett

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Reinhard Windoffer

    Institute of Molecular and Cellular Anatomy, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
    For correspondence
    rwindoffer@ukaachen.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1403-5880
  2. Nicole Schwarz

    Institute of Molecular and Cellular Anatomy, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Sungjun Yoon

    Institute of Molecular and Cellular Anatomy, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Teodora Piskova

    Institute of Molecular and Cellular Anatomy, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Michael Scholkemper

    Department of Computer Science, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Johannes Stegmaier

    Institute of Imaging and Computer Vision, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4072-3759
  7. Andrea Bönsch

    Visual Computing Institute, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5077-3675
  8. Jacopo Di Russo

    Interdisciplinary Centre for Clinical Research, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6731-9612
  9. Rudolf Leube

    Institute of Molecular and Cellular Anatomy, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
    For correspondence
    rleube@ukaachen.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (WI173/8-2)

  • Reinhard Windoffer

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (LE566/18-2)

  • Rudolf Leube

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (GRK2415/363055819)

  • Reinhard Windoffer
  • Nicole Schwarz
  • Sungjun Yoon
  • Teodora Piskova
  • Rudolf Leube

RWTH Aachen University (rwth0452)

  • Reinhard Windoffer

Medizinische Fakultät, RWTH Aachen University (IZKF)

  • Teodora Piskova
  • Jacopo Di Russo

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals and were approved by the Landesamt für Natur, Umwelt und Verbraucherschutz Nordrhein-Westfalen (LANUV; reference number 84-02.04.2015.A190 and approvals according to {section sign}4 of the German Animal Welfare Act).

Copyright

© 2022, Windoffer et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,864
    views
  • 296
    downloads
  • 9
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Reinhard Windoffer
  2. Nicole Schwarz
  3. Sungjun Yoon
  4. Teodora Piskova
  5. Michael Scholkemper
  6. Johannes Stegmaier
  7. Andrea Bönsch
  8. Jacopo Di Russo
  9. Rudolf Leube
(2022)
Quantitative mapping of keratin networks in 3D
eLife 11:e75894.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75894

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75894

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Kourosh Hayatigolkhatmi, Chiara Soriani ... Simona Rodighiero
    Tools and Resources

    Understanding the cell cycle at the single-cell level is crucial for cellular biology and cancer research. While current methods using fluorescent markers have improved the study of adherent cells, non-adherent cells remain challenging. In this study, we addressed this gap by combining a specialized surface to enhance cell attachment, the FUCCI(CA)2 sensor, an automated image analysis pipeline, and a custom machine learning algorithm. This approach enabled precise measurement of cell cycle phase durations in non-adherent cells. This method was validated in acute myeloid leukemia cell lines NB4 and Kasumi-1, which have unique cell cycle characteristics, and we tested the impact of cell cycle-modulating drugs on NB4 cells. Our cell cycle analysis system, which is also compatible with adherent cells, is fully automated and freely available, providing detailed insights from hundreds of cells under various conditions. This report presents a valuable tool for advancing cancer research and drug development by enabling comprehensive, automated cell cycle analysis in both adherent and non-adherent cells.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Heungjin Ryu, Kibum Nam ... Jung-Hoon Park
    Research Article

    In most murine species, spermatozoa exhibit a falciform apical hook at the head end. The function of the sperm hook is not yet clearly understood. In this study, we investigate the role of the sperm hook in the migration of spermatozoa through the female reproductive tract in Mus musculus (C57BL/6), using a deep tissue imaging custom-built two-photon microscope. Through live reproductive tract imaging, we found evidence indicating that the sperm hook aids in the attachment of spermatozoa to the epithelium and facilitates interactions between spermatozoa and the epithelium during migration in the uterus and oviduct. We also observed synchronized sperm beating, which resulted from the spontaneous unidirectional rearrangement of spermatozoa in the uterus. Based on live imaging of spermatozoa-epithelium interaction dynamics, we propose that the sperm hook plays a crucial role in successful migration through the female reproductive tract by providing anchor-like mechanical support and facilitating interactions between spermatozoa and the female reproductive tract in the house mouse.