Abstract

Bacteria are ubiquitous in our daily lives, either as motile planktonic cells or as immobilized surface-attached biofilms. These different phenotypic states play key roles in agriculture, environment, industry, and medicine; hence, it is critically important to be able to predict the conditions under which bacteria transition from one state to the other. Unfortunately, these transitions depend on a dizzyingly complex array of factors that are determined by the intrinsic properties of the individual cells as well as those of their surrounding environments, and are thus challenging to describe. To address this issue, here, we develop a generally-applicable biophysical model of the interplay between motility-mediated dispersal and biofilm formation under positive quorum sensing control. Using this model, we establish a universal rule predicting how the onset and extent of biofilm formation depend collectively on cell concentration and motility, nutrient diffusion and consumption, chemotactic sensing, and autoinducer production. Our work thus provides a key step toward quantitatively predicting and controlling biofilm formation in diverse and complex settings.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file; Source Data files have been provided for all Figures

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jenna Anne Moore-Ott

    Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6832-0658
  2. Selena Chiu

    Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Daniel B Amchin

    Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Tapomoy Bhattacharjee

    Andlinger Center for Energy and the Environment, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Sujit Sankar Datta

    Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    For correspondence
    ssdatta@princeton.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2400-1561

Funding

National Science Foundation (CBET-1941716)

  • Sujit Sankar Datta

National Science Foundation (EF-2124863)

  • Sujit Sankar Datta

National Science Foundation (DMR-2011750)

  • Sujit Sankar Datta

Pew Charitable Trusts (Pew Biomedical Scholars Program)

  • Sujit Sankar Datta

National Science Foundation (DGE-1656466)

  • Jenna Anne Moore-Ott

Princeton University (Eric and Wendy 708 Schmidt Transformative Technology Fund)

  • Sujit Sankar Datta

Princeton University (Princeton Catalysis Initiative)

  • Sujit Sankar Datta

Princeton University (Reiner G. Stoll Undergraduate Summer Fellowship)

  • Selena Chiu

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Moore-Ott et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,599
    views
  • 779
    downloads
  • 23
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jenna Anne Moore-Ott
  2. Selena Chiu
  3. Daniel B Amchin
  4. Tapomoy Bhattacharjee
  5. Sujit Sankar Datta
(2022)
A biophysical threshold for biofilm formation
eLife 11:e76380.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.76380

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.76380

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    Masaaki Uematsu, Jeremy M Baskin
    Tools and Resources

    Plasmid construction is central to life science research, and sequence verification is arguably its costliest step. Long-read sequencing has emerged as a competitor to Sanger sequencing, with the principal benefit that whole plasmids can be sequenced in a single run. Nevertheless, the current cost of nanopore sequencing is still prohibitive for routine sequencing during plasmid construction. We develop a computational approach termed Simple Algorithm for Very Efficient Multiplexing of Oxford Nanopore Experiments for You (SAVEMONEY) that guides researchers to mix multiple plasmids and subsequently computationally de-mixes the resultant sequences. SAVEMONEY defines optimal mixtures in a pre-survey step, and following sequencing, executes a post-analysis workflow involving sequence classification, alignment, and consensus determination. By using Bayesian analysis with prior probability of expected plasmid construction error rate, high-confidence sequences can be obtained for each plasmid in the mixture. Plasmids differing by as little as two bases can be mixed as a single sample for nanopore sequencing, and routine multiplexing of even six plasmids per 180 reads can still maintain high accuracy of consensus sequencing. SAVEMONEY should further democratize whole-plasmid sequencing by nanopore and related technologies, driving down the effective cost of whole-plasmid sequencing to lower than that of a single Sanger sequencing run.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Computational and Systems Biology
    Shinichi Kawaguchi, Xin Xu ... Toshie Kai
    Research Article

    Protein–protein interactions are fundamental to understanding the molecular functions and regulation of proteins. Despite the availability of extensive databases, many interactions remain uncharacterized due to the labor-intensive nature of experimental validation. In this study, we utilized the AlphaFold2 program to predict interactions among proteins localized in the nuage, a germline-specific non-membrane organelle essential for piRNA biogenesis in Drosophila. We screened 20 nuage proteins for 1:1 interactions and predicted dimer structures. Among these, five represented novel interaction candidates. Three pairs, including Spn-E_Squ, were verified by co-immunoprecipitation. Disruption of the salt bridges at the Spn-E_Squ interface confirmed their functional importance, underscoring the predictive model’s accuracy. We extended our analysis to include interactions between three representative nuage components—Vas, Squ, and Tej—and approximately 430 oogenesis-related proteins. Co-immunoprecipitation verified interactions for three pairs: Mei-W68_Squ, CSN3_Squ, and Pka-C1_Tej. Furthermore, we screened the majority of Drosophila proteins (~12,000) for potential interaction with the Piwi protein, a central player in the piRNA pathway, identifying 164 pairs as potential binding partners. This in silico approach not only efficiently identifies potential interaction partners but also significantly bridges the gap by facilitating the integration of bioinformatics and experimental biology.