Archaea are single-celled organisms that were discovered over half a century ago. Recently, there has been a renewed interest in these microbes because theyplay a key role in climate change by controlling greenhouse gas emissions, like methane. Indeed, methane-producing Archaea generate nearly 70% of the methane gas released into the atmosphere.

A group of proteins called c-type cytochromes are essential to energy generation in several methane-producing archaea. However, it is a mystery how Archaea assemble their c-type cytochromes. In fact, genomic studies suggest that Archaea are missing some of the c-type cytochrome assembly machinery that bacteria use. This has led scientists to suspect that Archaea have an alternate mechanism for building these essential components.

To solve this mystery, Gupta, Shalvarjian, and Nayak used CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing tools to characterize which proteins are essential for c-type cytochrome production in Methanosarcina acetivorans, a species of Archaea that produces methane. These experiments showed that M. acetivorans discarded a few parts of the process used by bacteria to generate c-type cytochromes, streamlining the assembly of these proteins. By comparing the genes of different Archaeal species, Gupta, Shalvarjian and Nayak were able to determine that Archaea acquired the genes for producing c-type cytochromes from bacteria via horizontal gene transfer, a process in which genes move directly from one organism into another. The streamlining of the process took place later, as different Archaeal species evolved independently, but losing the same parts of the process.

Gupta Shalvajiran and Nayak’s experiments also showed that c-type cytochromes are essential for the growth and fitness of methane-producing Archaea like M. acetivorans. The role of c-type cytochromes in methane production varies in different species of Archaea depending on their growth substrate or where they live. These results provide vital information about how Archaea produce methane, and the tools and techniques developed will aid further investigation of the role of Archaea in climate change.

C-type cytochromes (cyt(s) c) are found across the tree of life, and are critical to electron transfer processes ranging from aerobic respiration in the mitochondrion of Eukaryotes to intra/extracellular electron transport in Bacteria and Archaea (Richardson, 2000; Bertini et al., 2006; Shi et al., 2016; Gupta et al., 2020). The production of a holo-cyt c, that is capable of electron transfer, requires complex post-translational processing to covalently attach iron-protoporphyrin IX (heme b) to an unfolded apo-cyt c protein (Kranz et al., 2009; Sanders et al., 2010). Heme attachment occurs on the extracellular face of the cytoplasmic membrane, and, thus also requires the translocation of the apoprotein and heme across the membrane. The apoprotein is translocated via the Sec pathway (Sambongi et al., 1996; Thöny-Meyer and Künzler, 1997; Helde et al., 1997) and a set of proteins collectively known as the cyt c maturation system are involved in energy-dependent heme transport, apoprotein handling, and covalent cofactor attachment (Kranz et al., 2009; Sanders et al., 2010; Kranz et al., 1998). Three distinct systems for cyt c maturation have been identified thus far, and have been studied extensively in bacterial and eukaryotic model systems (Kranz et al., 2009; Sanders et al., 2010). However, despite growing evidence that cyt c play a vital role in electron transport processes across members of the Archaea – particularly in microorganisms that metabolize methane and other alkanes – the biogenesis of cyt c has never been functionally characterized in an archaeon.

Based on genomic surveys (Allen et al., 2006; Kletzin et al., 2015; Chadwick et al., 2021) of sequenced isolates and metagenomics assembled genomes, the vast majority of cyt c containing Archaea encode homologs of the System I cyt c maturation pathway (Ccm pathway) that is widespread in members of the Bacteria and is also present in the mitochondria of some Plants and Protozoa (Kranz et al., 2009; Giegé et al., 2008). The Ccm pathway is best characterized in Gram-negative bacteria, such as Escherichia coli, where nine to ten proteins, encoded by ccmABCDEFGH(I) and ccdA (or dsbD), are involved in cyt c biogenesis (Figure 1—figure supplement 1; Kranz et al., 2009; Sanders et al., 2010). Typically, the ccm genes are encoded in an operon on the chromosome and the ccmH open reading frame in E. coli is often found as two different genes, annotated as ccmH (or ccl2) and ccmI (or cycH), in bacteria like Rhodobacter capsulatus (Kranz et al., 2009). Genetic and biochemical studies of the Ccm pathway have revealed that the membrane-associated CcmABCD complex translocates heme across the cytoplasmic membrane to form holo-CcmE (Figure 1—figure supplement 1). Heme from holo-CcmE is ultimately transferred to the apo-cyt c by the CcmF/H complex (cytochrome synthetase) to form holo-cyt c. CcmG and CcdA (or DsbD) reduce the disulfide bond between cysteine residues of heme-binding motifs (CXXCH) in the apo-cyt c prior to heme attachment (Figure 1—figure supplement 1; Fabianek et al., 2000; Setterdahl et al., 2000; Reid et al., 2001). Curiously, most, if not all, archaeal genomes sequenced thus far lack several ccm genes (namely ccmD, ccmH, ccmI) that have been shown to be essential for cyt c biogenesis in Bacteria like E. coli, R. capsulatus, Paracoccus denitrificans, Bradyrhizobium japonicum, Shewenella oneidensis, and Desulfovibrio desulfuricans (Kranz et al., 1998; Thöny-Meyer, 1997; Goddard et al., 2010; Fu et al., 2015). In bacteria, CcmD facilitates the release of the heme-bound holo-CcmE from the CcmABCD complex (Richard-Fogal et al., 2008), while CcmH and CcmI are a part of the protein complex involved in covalent attachment of heme to the apo-cyt c (Figure 1—figure supplement 1; Kranz et al., 2009; Sanders et al., 2010). As such, based on evidence from studies with bacteria, the streamlined Ccm machinery found in archaeal genomes, comprised only of CcmABCEFG and CcdA, would be insufficient for the biogenesis of cyt c. However, mature cyt c proteins have been identified in many archaeal strains, such as Haloferax volcanii, Ignicoccus hospitalis, Pyrobaculum islandicum, Ferroglobus placidus, and Methanosarcina spp. (Kletzin et al., 2015; Sreeramulu, 2003; Nab et al., 2014; Smith et al., 2015; Feinberg et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2011). Whether Archaea have replaced CcmD, CcmH, and CcmI with non-orthologous proteins or have reconfigured the Ccm machinery such that ccmDHI are no longer essential remains unclear.

In this study, we used the genetically tractable methanogenic archaeon, M. acetivorans, as a model system to functionally characterize the pathway for biogenesis of cyt c in archaea. Most archaea that encode cyt c proteins are either recalcitrant to laboratory cultivation techniques, genetically intractable, or only encode only one cyt c that might be essential for growth (Allen et al., 2006; Kletzin et al., 2015; Chadwick et al., 2021; Arshad et al., 2015). In contrast, M. acetivorans encodes multiple cyt c proteins (Holmes et al., 2019), can be easily cultivated in a laboratory (Sowers et al., 1993), and has state-of-the-art genetic tools (Guss et al., 2008; Kohler and Metcalf, 2012), including inducible gene expression, tests for gene essentiality, and CRISPR-Cas9-based genome editing for complex genetic manipulation (Nayak and Metcalf, 2017). M. acetivorans is a methanogen that can only grow by coupling energy conservation to the production of methane gas using acetate or methylated compounds, like methanol, as a growth substrate. At least five different cyt c proteins are encoded in the M. acetivorans genome and these proteins contain between one and seven heme-binding motifs (Holmes et al., 2019). Recent studies have even proposed distinct roles for some of these cyt c proteins in intracellular electron transport during methanogenesis (Wang et al., 2011; Li et al., 2006; Schlegel et al., 2012; Ferry, 2020), extracellular electron transfer (Holmes et al., 2019), as well as direct interspecies electron transfer between M. acetivorans and bacterial strains like Geobacter metallireducens (Holmes et al., 2021). Thus, M. acetivorans is not only an ideal candidate to dissect the biogenesis of cyt c in Archaea but also to functionally characterize the role of cyt c in various electron transfer processes that have ramifications on global carbon cycling as well as on the formation of microbial communities in anoxic environments.

Here, we have used a combination of genetic, molecular, and biochemical analyses, to show that M. acetivorans and other archaea use a streamlined version of the Ccm machinery that only requires ccmABCEF for cyt c biogenesis. To this end, we have shown that the ccmABCEF from M. acetivorans is sufficient to produce holo-cyt c in a heterologous host, Methanosarcina barkeri Fusaro, that otherwise is incapable of cyt c biogenesis. Our physiological analyses also reveal substrate-specific phenotypes for the cyt c biogenesis pathway and cyt(s) c during growth and methanogenesis in M. acetivorans. A closer inspection of the distribution and synteny of the cyt c biogenesis genes in methane-metabolizing archaea related to Methanosarcina (i.e. belonging to the order Methanosarcinales) suggests that the cyt c biogenesis genes were likely acquired in the last common ancestor of the Methanosarcinales and have been lost in many extant clades that also do not encode any cyt c genes. Although the streamlined Ccm machinery is conserved across Archaea, our evolutionary analyses suggest that the acquisition of cyt c biogenesis in Archaea has occurred through multiple horizontal gene transfer (HGT) events with different members of the Bacteria. Overall, we have used the model methanogenic archaeon, M. acetivorans, as a model system to characterize a streamlined form of the Ccm machinery used for the biogenesis of cyt c in members of Archaea.

Cyt c are widely found in members of the Archaea where they catalyze numerous electron transfer processes that facilitate microbial interactions and fuel biogeochemical cycles. The biogenesis of cyt c is complex and is mediated by a dedicated pathway that can vary substantially across the tree of life. In the vast majority of eukaryotes, a single protein called cyt c heme lyase is involved in the biogenesis of cyt c (Kranz et al., 2009). In contrast, bacteria contain more complex pathways that are fine-tuned to work with lower concentrations of heme (Kranz et al., 2009). The most complex of these pathways, called the Ccm machinery, requires at least nine to ten proteins (CcmABCDEFGH(I) and CcdA/DsbD) that work in concert for the biogenesis of cyt c. The biochemical details of the Ccm machinery in bacteria has been studied in great detail using model systems over the past few decades and the role of each ccm gene is well established at this point (Kranz et al., 2009; Sanders et al., 2010). Previous research has shown that archaea encode some components of the bacterial Ccm machinery (Allen et al., 2006; Kletzin et al., 2015), however, orthologs of at least three proteins (CcmD, CcmH, and CcmI) that are absolutely critical for cyt c maturation in bacteria are universally absent in archaeal genomes. Thus, it was unclear how the Ccm machinery is being repurposed (if at all) for cyt c biogenesis in archaea. In this study, we use the methanogen M. acetivorans to characterize a streamlined form of the Ccm system comprised of only five proteins (CcmABCEF) that likely serves as the predominant route for cyt c biogenesis in members of the Archaea (Figures 2 and 5).

Based on our findings, there are three key differences between the Ccm machinery in Bacteria and Archaea. While ccmD seems to be uniformally absent in archaeal genomes (Allen et al., 2006), it is universally present in bacterial genomes and is essential for cyt c biogenesis in a number of strains ranging from E. coli and Rhodobacter capsultus to D. desulfuricans (Kranz et al., 2009; Goddard et al., 2010; Richard-Fogal et al., 2008). In bacteria, CcmD is a small (69 aa long) transmembrane protein that associates with CcmABC and facilitates the release of holo-CcmE in the periplasm after heme transport and attachment (Richard-Fogal et al., 2008; Feissner et al., 2006a). In M. acetivorans, the CcmABC complex is capable of forming holo-CcmE and releasing it into the pseudo-periplasm in a CcmD-independent manner (Figure 3). It is unlikely that the ccmD gene has been fused to ccmA, ccmB, or ccmC based on the sequence length and alignment of the archaeal genes with their bacterial counterparts (Figure 8—figure supplements 1–3). It is also unlikely that the CcmD-independent mechanism for the release of holo-CcmE from CcmABC might be linked to the CXXXY heme-binding motif in CcmE because some bacteria, like D. desulfuricans, that encode ccmD and require this gene product for cyt c biogenesis also contain a CXXXY heme-binding motif in CcmE (Figure 4; Goddard et al., 2010). One plausible hypothesis for the absence of CcmD might be the unusual architecture of archaeal membranes. The archaeal cytoplasmic membrane is composed of isoprenoid lipids (phytanyl units), compared to phospholipids in bacterial cytoplasmic membranes. This lipid composition might alter how CcmABC and CcmE are anchored into the membrane and render CcmD inconsequential during the formation and release of holo-CcmE.

Next, the archaeal CcmE universally contains a CXXXY heme-binding motif whereas bacterial CcmE can either have an HXXXY motif or a CXXXY motif depending on the strain (Kranz et al., 2009; Goddard et al., 2010). In E. coli, an H130C allele of CcmE can still bind heme but cannot transfer the heme to the CcmFH complex (Goddard et al., 2010; Enggist and Thöny-Meyer, 2003; Stevens et al., 2003). In contrast, a C120H mutation in M. acetivorans seems to destabilize the protein to such an extent that it can no longer be detected (Figure 4 and Figure 4—figure supplement 1). Similarly, no heme-bound CcmE was detected for the C127H allele of CcmE derived from the bacterium D. desulfuricans (Goddard et al., 2010). Taken together, these data suggest that the Cys and His residues involved in heme-binding CcmE are not interchangeable. In fact, many other as yet uncharacterized features of CcmE, possibly unique to these two groups of CcmE proteins, are likely to be equally important for the formation of holo-CcmE and the transfer of heme to the apo-cyt c via interactions between CcmE and CcmF as well as other proteins. Whether the absence of an HXXXY motif containing CcmE in archaea is just an artifact of historical contingency or due to functional/evolutionary constraints remains unclear.

Finally, the cyt c synthetase complex in bacteria contains two (CcmFH or CcmFI) or three (CcmFHI) proteins depending on the strain whereas the archaeal counterpart only contains CcmF. In M. acetivorans, the CcmF gene is split into two coding sequences (ccmF1 and ccmF2), each of which might be derived from different bacterial groups (Figure 8 and Figure 8—figure supplements 5 and 6). Functionally important domains of the cyt c synthetase complex including the two histidine residues that coordinate the pseudo-periplasmic heme b as well as the highly conserved WWD domain are all present in CcmF2 (Figure 2—figure supplement 1). CcmF1 probably plays a secondary role in cyt c biogenesis, which might explain why a small amount of holo-cyt c can still be detected in the ∆ccmF1 mutant of M. acetivorans (Figure 2). In bacteria and Arabidopsis, CcmH/I have been shown to interact with the apo-cyt c and deliver it to CcmF (Kranz et al., 2009; Setterdahl et al., 2000; Meyer et al., 2005). It is unlikely that M. acetivorans and other archaea have replaced CcmH/I with a non-orthologous protein as heterologous expression of ccmABCEF1F2 in the non-native host, M. barkeri Fusaro, seems to be sufficient for cyt c biogenesis (Figure 5). However, we cannot distinguish between the possibility that M. barkeri Fusaro also encodes this non-ortholgous protein or that the standalone CcmF in M. acetivorans performs the function of CcmFH in E. coli.

Within the Archaea, cyt c are especially enriched in the family Methanosarcinaceae wherein these proteins have likely fostered tremendous metabolic innovation (Mand and Metcalf, 2019). Our work and other studies (Holmes et al., 2019; Ferry, 2020; Holmes et al., 2021; Zhou et al., 2021) show that cyt c like MmcA are intricately coupled to growth under a variety of conditions in the marine methanogen M. acetivorans (Figure 6). Furthermore, membrane-spanning multi-heme cyt c have been shown to facilitate anaerobic methane oxidation by microbial consortia comprised of ANME archaea and sulfate reducing bacteria (Wegener et al., 2015; McGlynn et al., 2015; Scheller et al., 2016; He et al., 2019) and recent studies also suggest an important role for cyt c in facilitating anaerobic alkane metabolism in several members of the Methanosarcinaceae (Borrel et al., 2019). Since ANME and alkane oxidizing archaea are yet to be isolated in pure culture, our ability to manipulate the biogenesis of cyt c also renders M. acetivorans as an ideal platform to perform functional analyses of diverse cyt c across the Methanosarcinaceae. Curiously, even though cyt c are widely present in members of the Methanosarcinaceae, there are many extant strains, such as M. barkeri Fusaro, that lack the Ccm machinery altogether and do not encode any cyt c proteins in their genome. Our evolutionary analyses provide strong evidence that the uneven distribution of the Ccm machinery and cyt c in the Methanosarcinaceae is due to gene loss events rather than independent gene gain events (Figure 7 and Figure 7—figure supplement 1). It is also worth noting that many of the extant lineages that lack the Ccm machinery and cyt c are found in freshwater or anthropogenic sources (like waste digestors); reciprocally, the Ccm machinery and diverse cyt c are especially conserved in lineages derived from marine environments (Figure 7 and Figure 7—figure supplement 1). This pattern is indicative of the likelihood that there might be environment-specific selective pressure to retain or discard cyt c and the associated biogenesis machinery. However, the specific biotic or abiotic environmental cues that underlie this pattern remain unclear at the moment.

Previous studies (Allen et al., 2006; Kletzin et al., 2015) have used some of the unique features that unify the archaeal Ccm machinery, notably the absence of CcmDHI and a conserved CXXXY heme-binding domain in CcmE, to support an ancestral origin of the Ccm machinery in the Archaea. Our phylogenetic analyses (Figure 8 and Figure 8—figure supplements 1–6) contradict this hypothesis and provide strong evidence supporting the hypothesis that there have been many independent HGT events that have cross-pollinated the Ccm machinery between the Archaea and Bacteria. In fact, even the Ccm machinery in one single archaeon, like M. acetivorans, may not have been derived from a single source (Figure 8 and Figure 8—figure supplements 1–6). Taken together, the streamlined Ccm machinery in the Archaea is functionally uniform despite independent evolutionary origins.

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file; sequencing data have been deposited in the NCBI SRA (Sequence Read Archive) under bioproject number PRJNA800036. Source data files for Figure1b, Figure 2c, Figure 3d, Figure 4c and Figure 3—figure supplement 1, Figure 4—figure supplement 1 and 2, are provided.

1. 1. Nayak DD
   2. Gupta D
   3. Shalvarjian KE

   (2022) NCBI Sequence Read Archive

   ID PRJNA800036. Whole genome re-sequencing data for the Methanosarcina acetivorans ccmABC deletion mutant.

   https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=PRJNA800036

1. 1. Allen JWA
   2. Ginger ML
   3. Ferguson SJ

   (2005) Complexity and diversity in c -type cytochrome biogenesis systems

   Biochemical Society Transactions 33:145–146.

   https://doi.org/10.1042/BST0330145

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Allen JWA
   2. Harvat EM
   3. Stevens JM
   4. Ferguson SJ

   (2006) A variant System I for cytochrome c biogenesis in archaea and some bacteria has A novel CcmE and no CcmH

   FEBS Letters 580:4827–4834.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2006.07.073

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Arshad A
   2. Speth DR
   3. de Graaf RM
   4. Op den Camp HJM
   5. Jetten MSM
   6. Welte CU

   (2015) A Metagenomics-Based Metabolic Model of Nitrate-Dependent Anaerobic Oxidation of Methane by Methanoperedens-Like Archaea

   Frontiers in Microbiology 6:1423.

   https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01423

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Bertini I
   2. Cavallaro G
   3. Rosato A

   (2006) Cytochrome c: occurrence and functions

   Chemical Reviews 106:90–115.

   https://doi.org/10.1021/cr050241v

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Boccazzi P
   2. Zhang JK
   3. Metcalf WW

   (2000) Generation of dominant selectable markers for resistance to pseudomonic acid by cloning and mutagenesis of the ileS gene from the archaeon Methanosarcina barkeri fusaro

   Journal of Bacteriology 182:2611–2618.

   https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.182.9.2611-2618.2000

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Borrel G
   2. Adam PS
   3. McKay LJ
   4. Chen LX
   5. Sierra-García IN
   6. Sieber CMK
   7. Letourneur Q
   8. Ghozlane A
   9. Andersen GL
   10. Li WJ
   11. Hallam SJ
   12. Muyzer G
   13. de Oliveira VM
   14. Inskeep WP
   15. Banfield JF
   16. Gribaldo S

   (2019) Wide diversity of methane and short-chain alkane metabolisms in uncultured archaea

   Nature Microbiology 4:603–613.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-019-0363-3

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
7. Preprint

   1. Chadwick GL
   2. Skennerton CT
   3. Laso-Pérez R
   4. Leu AO
   5. Speth DR
   6. Yu H
   7. Morgan-Lang C
   8. Hatzenpichler R
   9. Goudeau D
   10. Malmstrom R
   11. Brazelton WJ
   12. Woyke T
   13. Hallam SJ
   14. Tyson GW
   15. Wegener G
   16. Boetius A
   17. Orphan VJ

   (2021) Comparative Genomics Reveals Electron Transfer and Syntrophic Mechanisms Differentiating Methanotrophic and Methanogenic Archaea

   bioRxiv.

   https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.25.461819

   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Chen I-MA
   2. Chu K
   3. Palaniappan K
   4. Pillay M
   5. Ratner A
   6. Huang J
   7. Huntemann M
   8. Varghese N
   9. White JR
   10. Seshadri R
   11. Smirnova T
   12. Kirton E
   13. Jungbluth SP
   14. Woyke T
   15. Eloe-Fadrosh EA
   16. Ivanova NN
   17. Kyrpides NC

   (2019) IMG/M v.5.0: an integrated data management and comparative analysis system for microbial genomes and microbiomes

   Nucleic Acids Research 47:D666–D677.

   https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky901

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Christensen O
   2. Harvat EM
   3. Thöny-Meyer L
   4. Ferguson SJ
   5. Stevens JM

   (2007) Loss of ATP hydrolysis activity by CcmAB results in loss of c-type cytochrome synthesis and incomplete processing of CcmE

   FEBS Journal 274:2322–2332.

   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.05769.x

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Deatherage DE
    2. Barrick JE

    (2014) Identification of mutations in laboratory-evolved microbes from next-generation sequencing data using breseq

    Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.) 1151:165–188.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0554-6_12

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Doench JG
    2. Fusi N
    3. Sullender M
    4. Hegde M
    5. Vaimberg EW
    6. Donovan KF
    7. Smith I
    8. Tothova Z
    9. Wilen C
    10. Orchard R
    11. Virgin HW
    12. Listgarten J
    13. Root DE

    (2016) Optimized sgRNA design to maximize activity and minimize off-target effects of CRISPR-Cas9

    Nature Biotechnology 34:184–191.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3437

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Enggist E
    2. Thöny-Meyer L

    (2003) The C-terminal flexible domain of the heme chaperone CcmE is important but not essential for its function

    Journal of Bacteriology 185:3821–3827.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.185.13.3821-3827.2003

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Fabianek RA
    2. Hennecke H
    3. Thöny-Meyer L

    (2000) Periplasmic protein thiol:disulfide oxidoreductases of Escherichia coli

    FEMS Microbiology Reviews 24:303–316.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2000.tb00544.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Feinberg LF
    2. Srikanth R
    3. Vachet RW
    4. Holden JF

    (2008) Constraints on anaerobic respiration in the hyperthermophilic Archaea Pyrobaculum islandicum and Pyrobaculum aerophilum

    Applied and Environmental Microbiology 74:396–402.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02033-07

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Feissner R
    2. Xiang Y
    3. Kranz RG

    (2003) Chemiluminescent-based methods to detect subpicomole levels of c-type cytochromes

    Analytical Biochemistry 315:90–94.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2697(02)00658-9

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Feissner RE
    2. Richard-Fogal CL
    3. Frawley ER
    4. Kranz RG

    (2006a) ABC transporter-mediated release of a haem chaperone allows cytochrome c biogenesis

    Molecular Microbiology 61:219–231.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05221.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Feissner RE
    2. Richard-Fogal CL
    3. Frawley ER
    4. Loughman JA
    5. Earley KW
    6. Kranz RG

    (2006b) Recombinant cytochromes c biogenesis systems I and II and analysis of haem delivery pathways in Escherichia coli

    Molecular Microbiology 60:563–577.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05132.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Ferry JG

    (2020) Methanosarcina acetivorans: A Model for Mechanistic Understanding of Aceticlastic and Reverse Methanogenesis

    Frontiers in Microbiology 11:1806.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01806

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Fu H
    2. Jin M
    3. Wan F
    4. Gao H

    (2015) Shewanella oneidensis cytochrome c maturation component CcmI is essential for heme attachment at the non-canonical motif of nitrite reductase NrfA

    Molecular Microbiology 95:410–425.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.12865

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Giegé P
    2. Grienenberger JM
    3. Bonnard G

    (2008) Cytochrome c biogenesis in mitochondria

    Mitochondrion 8:61–73.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mito.2007.10.001

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Goddard AD
    2. Stevens JM
    3. Rao F
    4. Mavridou DAI
    5. Chan W
    6. Richardson DJ
    7. Allen JWA
    8. Ferguson SJ

    (2010) c-Type cytochrome biogenesis can occur via a natural Ccm system lacking CcmH, CcmG, and the heme-binding histidine of CcmE

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 285:22882–22889.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.133421

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Goldman BS
    2. Beckman DL
    3. Bali A
    4. Monika EM
    5. Gabbert KK
    6. Kranz RG

    (1997) Molecular and immunological analysis of an ABC transporter complex required for cytochrome c biogenesis

    Journal of Molecular Biology 268:724–738.

    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1997.0992

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Gupta D
    2. Sutherland MC
    3. Rengasamy K
    4. Meacham JM
    5. Kranz RG
    6. Bose A

    (2019) Photoferrotrophs Produce a PioAB Electron Conduit for Extracellular Electron Uptake

    MBio 10:e02668-19.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02668-19

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Gupta D
    2. Guzman MS
    3. Bose A

    (2020) Extracellular electron uptake by autotrophic microbes: physiological, ecological, and evolutionary implications

    Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology 47:863–876.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-020-02309-0

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Guss AM
    2. Rother M
    3. Zhang JK
    4. Kulkarni G
    5. Metcalf WW

    (2008) New methods for tightly regulated gene expression and highly efficient chromosomal integration of cloned genes for Methanosarcina species

    Archaea (Vancouver, B.C.) 2:193–203.

    https://doi.org/10.1155/2008/534081

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
26. 1. He X
    2. Chadwick G
    3. Kempes C
    4. Shi Y
    5. McGlynn S
    6. Orphan V
    7. Meile C

    (2019) Microbial interactions in the anaerobic oxidation of methane: model simulations constrained by process rates and activity patterns

    Environmental Microbiology 21:631–647.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.14507

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Helde R
    2. Wiesler B
    3. Wachter E
    4. Neubüser A
    5. Hoffschulte HK
    6. Hengelage T
    7. Schimz KL
    8. Stuart RA
    9. Müller M

    (1997) Comparative characterization of SecA from the alpha-subclass purple bacterium Rhodobacter capsulatus and Escherichia coli reveals differences in membrane and precursor specificity

    Journal of Bacteriology 179:4003–4012.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.179.12.4003-4012.1997

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Holmes DE
    2. Ueki T
    3. Tang H-Y
    4. Zhou J
    5. Smith JA
    6. Chaput G
    7. Lovley DR

    (2019) A Membrane-Bound Cytochrome Enables Methanosarcina acetivorans To Conserve Energy from Extracellular Electron Transfer

    MBio 10:e00789-19.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00789-19

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Holmes DE
    2. Zhou J
    3. Ueki T
    4. Woodard T
    5. Lovley DR
    6. Papoutsakis ET

    (2021) Mechanisms for Electron Uptake by Methanosarcina acetivorans during Direct Interspecies Electron Transfer

    MBio 12:e02344-21.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02344-21

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Kim SY
    2. Ju K-S
    3. Metcalf WW
    4. Evans BS
    5. Kuzuyama T
    6. van der Donk WA

    (2012) Different biosynthetic pathways to fosfomycin in Pseudomonas syringae and Streptomyces species

    Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 56:4175–4183.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.06478-11

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Kletzin A
    2. Heimerl T
    3. Flechsler J
    4. van Niftrik L
    5. Rachel R
    6. Klingl A

    (2015) Cytochromes c in Archaea: distribution, maturation, cell architecture, and the special case of Ignicoccus hospitalis

    Frontiers in Microbiology 6:439.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00439

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Kohler PRA
    2. Metcalf WW

    (2012) Genetic manipulation of Methanosarcina spp

    Frontiers in Microbiology 3:259.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2012.00259

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Kranz R
    2. Lill R
    3. Goldman B
    4. Bonnard G
    5. Merchant S

    (1998) Molecular mechanisms of cytochrome c biogenesis: three distinct systems

    Molecular Microbiology 29:383–396.

    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00869.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Kranz RG
    2. Richard-Fogal C
    3. Taylor JS
    4. Frawley ER

    (2009) Cytochrome c biogenesis: mechanisms for covalent modifications and trafficking of heme and for heme-iron redox control

    Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 73:510–528.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00001-09

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Li Q
    2. Li L
    3. Rejtar T
    4. Lessner DJ
    5. Karger BL
    6. Ferry JG

    (2006) Electron transport in the pathway of acetate conversion to methane in the marine archaeon Methanosarcina acetivorans

    Journal of Bacteriology 188:702–710.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.188.2.702-710.2006

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Mand TD
    2. Metcalf WW

    (2019) Energy Conservation and Hydrogenase Function in Methanogenic Archaea, in Particular the Genus Methanosarcina

    Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 83:e00020-19.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00020-19

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
37. 1. McGlynn SE
    2. Chadwick GL
    3. Kempes CP
    4. Orphan VJ

    (2015) Single cell activity reveals direct electron transfer in methanotrophic consortia

    Nature 526:531–535.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15512

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Mendler K
    2. Chen H
    3. Parks DH
    4. Lobb B
    5. Hug LA
    6. Doxey AC

    (2019) AnnoTree: visualization and exploration of a functionally annotated microbial tree of life

    Nucleic Acids Research 47:4442–4448.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz246

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Metcalf WW
    2. Zhang JK
    3. Apolinario E
    4. Sowers KR
    5. Wolfe RS

    (1997) A genetic system for Archaea of the genus Methanosarcina: liposome-mediated transformation and construction of shuttle vectors

    PNAS 94:2626–2631.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.6.2626

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Metcalf WW
    2. Zhang JK
    3. Wolfe RS

    (1998) An anaerobic, intrachamber incubator for growth of Methanosarcina spp on methanol-containing solid media

    Applied and Environmental Microbiology 64:768–770.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.64.2.768-770.1998

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Meyer EH
    2. Giegé P
    3. Gelhaye E
    4. Rayapuram N
    5. Ahuja U
    6. Thöny-Meyer L
    7. Grienenberger JM
    8. Bonnard G

    (2005) AtCCMH, an essential component of the c-type cytochrome maturation pathway in Arabidopsis mitochondria, interacts with apocytochrome c

    PNAS 102:16113–16118.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0503473102

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
42. Conference

    1. Miller MA
    2. Pfeiffer W
    3. Schwartz T

    (2010) 2010 Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE 2010

    IEEE Computer Society Digital Library. pp. 1–8.

    https://doi.org/10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129

    • Google Scholar
43. 1. Nab B
    2. Pöll U
    3. Langer JD
    4. Kreuter L
    5. Küper U
    6. Flechsler J
    7. Heimerl T
    8. Rachel R
    9. Huber H
    10. Kletzin A

    (2014) Three multihaem cytochromes c from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Ignicoccus hospitalis: purification, properties and localization

    Microbiology (Reading, England) 160:1278–1289.

    https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.077792-0

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Nayak DD
    2. Mahanta N
    3. Mitchell DA
    4. Metcalf WW

    (2017) Post-translational thioamidation of methyl-coenzyme M reductase, a key enzyme in methanogenic and methanotrophic archaea

    eLife 6:e29218.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.29218

    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Nayak DD
    2. Metcalf WW

    (2017) Cas9-mediated genome editing in the methanogenic archaeon Methanosarcina acetivorans

    PNAS 114:2976–2981.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618596114

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Nayak DD
    2. Liu A
    3. Agrawal N
    4. Rodriguez-Carerro R
    5. Dong SH
    6. Mitchell DA
    7. Nair SK
    8. Metcalf WW
    9. Sass H

    (2020) Functional interactions between posttranslationally modified amino acids of methyl-coenzyme M reductase in Methanosarcina acetivorans

    PLOS Biology 18:e3000507.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000507

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Parks DH
    2. Chuvochina M
    3. Rinke C
    4. Mussig AJ
    5. Chaumeil PA
    6. Hugenholtz P

    (2022) GTDB: an ongoing census of bacterial and archaeal diversity through a phylogenetically consistent, rank normalized and complete genome-based taxonomy

    Nucleic Acids Research 50:D785–D794.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab776

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Reid E
    2. Cole J
    3. Eaves DJ

    (2001) The Escherichia coli CcmG protein fulfils a specific role in cytochrome c assembly

    The Biochemical Journal 355:51–58.

    https://doi.org/10.1042/0264-6021:3550051

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Richard-Fogal CL
    2. Frawley ER
    3. Kranz RG

    (2008) Topology and function of CcmD in cytochrome C maturation

    Journal of Bacteriology 190:3489–3493.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00146-08

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
50. 1. Richardson DJ

    (2000) Bacterial respiration: a flexible process for a changing environment

    Microbiology (Reading, England) 146 (Pt 3):551–571.

    https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-146-3-551

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Sambongi Y
    2. Stoll R
    3. Ferguson SJ

    (1996) Alteration of haem-attachment and signal-cleavage sites for Paracoccus denitrificans cytochrome C550 probes pathway of c-type cytochrome biogenesis in Escherichia coli

    Molecular Microbiology 19:1193–1204.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.1996.tb02465.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Sanders C
    2. Turkarslan S
    3. Lee DW
    4. Daldal F

    (2010) Cytochrome c biogenesis: the Ccm system

    Trends in Microbiology 18:266–274.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2010.03.006

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
53. 1. Scheller S
    2. Yu H
    3. Chadwick GL
    4. McGlynn SE
    5. Orphan VJ

    (2016) Artificial electron acceptors decouple archaeal methane oxidation from sulfate reduction

    Science (New York, N.Y.) 351:703–707.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad7154

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
54. 1. Schlegel K
    2. Welte C
    3. Deppenmeier U
    4. Müller V

    (2012) Electron transport during aceticlastic methanogenesis by Methanosarcina acetivorans involves a sodium-translocating Rnf complex

    The FEBS Journal 279:4444–4452.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.12031

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
55. 1. Schulz H
    2. Hennecke H
    3. Thöny-Meyer L

    (1998) Prototype of a heme chaperone essential for cytochrome c maturation

    Science (New York, N.Y.) 281:1197–1200.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.281.5380.1197

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
56. 1. Setterdahl AT
    2. Goldman BS
    3. Hirasawa M
    4. Jacquot P
    5. Smith AJ
    6. Kranz RG
    7. Knaff DB

    (2000) Oxidation-reduction properties of disulfide-containing proteins of the Rhodobacter capsulatus cytochrome c biogenesis system

    Biochemistry 39:10172–10176.

    https://doi.org/10.1021/bi000663t

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
57. 1. Shi L
    2. Dong H
    3. Reguera G
    4. Beyenal H
    5. Lu A
    6. Liu J
    7. Yu H-Q
    8. Fredrickson JK

    (2016) Extracellular electron transfer mechanisms between microorganisms and minerals

    Nature Reviews. Microbiology 14:651–662.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2016.93

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
58. 1. Smith JA
    2. Aklujkar M
    3. Risso C
    4. Leang C
    5. Giloteaux L
    6. Holmes DE

    (2015) Mechanisms involved in Fe(III) respiration by the hyperthermophilic archaeon Ferroglobus placidus

    Applied and Environmental Microbiology 81:2735–2744.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.04038-14

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
59. 1. Sowers KR
    2. Boone JE
    3. Gunsalus RP

    (1993) Disaggregation of Methanosarcina spp and Growth as Single Cells at Elevated Osmolarity

    Applied and Environmental Microbiology 59:3832–3839.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.59.11.3832-3839.1993

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
60. 1. Sreeramulu K

    (2003)

    Purification and partial characterization of cytochrome c552 from Halobacterium salinarium

    Indian Journal of Biochemistry & Biophysics 40:274–277.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
61. 1. Stevens JM
    2. Daltrop O
    3. Higham CW
    4. Ferguson SJ

    (2003) Interaction of heme with variants of the heme chaperone CcmE carrying active site mutations and a cleavable N-terminal His tag

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 278:20500–20506.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M212925200

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
62. 1. Thöny-Meyer L

    (1997) Biogenesis of respiratory cytochromes in bacteria

    Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 61:337–376.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.61.3.337-376.1997

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
63. 1. Thöny-Meyer L
    2. Künzler P

    (1997) Translocation to the periplasm and signal sequence cleavage of preapocytochrome c depend on sec and lep, but not on the ccm gene products

    European Journal of Biochemistry 246:794–799.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1997.t01-1-00794.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
64. 1. Wang M
    2. Tomb JF
    3. Ferry JG

    (2011) Electron transport in acetate-grown Methanosarcina acetivorans

    BMC Microbiology 11:165.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-11-165

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
65. 1. Wegener G
    2. Krukenberg V
    3. Riedel D
    4. Tegetmeyer HE
    5. Boetius A

    (2015) Intercellular wiring enables electron transfer between methanotrophic archaea and bacteria

    Nature 526:587–590.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15733

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
66. 1. Zhou J
    2. Holmes DE
    3. Tang HY
    4. Lovley DR
    5. Semrau JD

    (2021) Correlation of Key Physiological Properties of Methanosarcina Isolates with Environment of Origin

    Applied and Environmental Microbiology 87:e00731-21.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00731-21

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Dinesh Gupta

   Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Writing - review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9108-9669

2. Katie E Shalvarjian

   Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States

   Contribution

   Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Validation, Writing - review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4792-8477

3. Dipti D Nayak

   Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Writing - review and editing

   For correspondence

   dnayak@berkeley.edu

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3449-3419

• 1,786

  views

• 227

  downloads

• 2

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.